asw reality vs. rumor activity
DESCRIPTION
Analysis of Student Work Coordinator and Think Tank Update Broadcast: Wednesday, July 16 1:00 – 3:00 p.m. ASW Reality vs. Rumor Activity. NC Professional Teaching Standards. Standard I: Teachers demonstrate leadership. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Analysis of Student Work
Coordinator and Think Tank Update
Broadcast: Wednesday, July 161:00 – 3:00 p.m.
ASWReality vs. Rumor
Activity
Standard I: Teachers demonstrate leadership.
Standard II: Teachers establish a respectful environment for a diverse population of students.
Standard III: Teachers know the content they teach.
Standard IV: Teachers facilitate learning for their students.
Standard V: Teachers reflect on their practice.
Standard VI: Teachers contribute to the academic success of students.
NC Professional Teaching Standards
5 Rating Categories
1 65432Demonstrate Leadership
Establish Environment
KnowContent
Facilitate Learning
Reflect on Practice
Contribute to Academic
Success
3 Rating CategoriesNot Demonstrated
DevelopingProficient
AccomplishedDistinguished
Does Not Meet Expected GrowthMeets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth
Overview of Standard 6
NC Educator Evaluation System
Overview of Standard 6
Contribute to
Academic Success
End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course (EOC) tests
6 NC Final Exams
6 Career Technical Education Assessment
6 Analysis of Student Work
K-3 Checkpoints6
6
Analysis of Student Work
6 Analysis of Student Work
Contribute to
Academic Success
In 2014-2015, ASW is the Standard 6 measure for teachers in Advanced Placement, Arts Education, Healthful Living, International Baccalaureate, and World Languages.
Growth is based on student work submitted by teachers and rated by content experts in a “blind review” process.
• Fall 2011 Design Groups
• Spring 2013 ASW Pilot
• 2013 – 2014 ASW Pilot
Analysis of Student Work Process
Over 1100 NC Educators Representing
Advanced PlacementArts EducationHealthful Living
International Baccalaureate
Occupational Preparation7th Grade Social Studies
World HistoryWorld Languages
ASW 2014 Pilot Participants
8Regions Content Areas
?Questions about the previous section? Type
them in the question box now.
Overview of ASW Process
Teacher receives category rating for Standard 6
Teacher collects TAs of student work
Reviewers rate Evidence
Collections
Overview of the ASW Process
Teacher verifies schedule and chooses objectives for each course
Teacher Uploads Evidence
Collection to Online
Platform
Overview of the ASW Process
Overview of the ASW Process
ASW Process: A Quick Guide
Items needed to compile a Timelapse Artifact (TA):• A specific objective measured over
2 distinct points in time• Work Sample Options:
Student or Whole Class • Method(s) or tool(s) for collecting• 2 work samples• Context
Overview of the ASW Process
Objectives:Using the Strands and Standards guidance charts, 5 objectives will be chosen.
Overview of the ASW Process
?Questions about the previous section? Type
them in the question box now.
Work Samples:Option 1 – Student Work SamplesCollect and keep 2 work samples:• for each class member• for the objective • at 2 separate points in time
Overview of the ASW Process
Work Samples:Option 2 – Whole Class Work Samples2 work samples that represent the entire class• for the objective • at 2 separate points in time
Overview of the ASW Process
Pre TestSljdflkjdf sdfljsdfljdf sdflkjsdf sdflnksdflnsdf sdfllsdf sdflnsdf
sdfklsdflkjf fsl flk sdflkjsdf sdf
Ljsdflksdf ;mf sdflmdf sdf;df msdf;sdf sdfmsdf lmf, sdfmsd.
Sdmsdf0 lsdjlkjsdflkjsdfljk
Ljdflkjf ljkdlkjsdf tjtlkjltj ;jke;ljkw;jkw ;kw;lkwet ;w;jw ;jkw;ljkw klwe
ljsdfljsdf sdljsdfljsdf Sljdflkjdf sdfljsdfljdf sdflkjsdf sdflnksdflnsdf sdfllsdf sdflnsdf
sdfklsdflkjf fsl flk sdflkjsdf sdf
Ljsdflksdf ;mf sdflmdf sdf;df msdf;sdf sdfmsdf lmf, sdfmsd.
Sdmsdf0 lsdjlkjsdflkjsdfljk
Ljdflkjf ljkdlkjsdf tjtlkjltj ;jke;ljkw;jkw ;kw;lkwet ;w;jw ;jkw;ljkw klwe
ljsdfljsdf sdljsdfljsdf Sljdflkjdf sdfljsdfljdf sdflkjsdf sdflnksdflnsdf sdfllsdf sdflnsdf
sdfklsdflkjf fsl flk sdflkjsdf sdf
Overview of the ASW Process Method(s) or tool(s) for collecting:
TA 1
Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work SamplesOnline platform will select3 students
The TA will be compiled using the Student Work Samples from these selected students.
Overview of the ASW Process
Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work Samples
If a student work sample is unavailable, that studentwill be reshuffled to createanother sampling.
TA 1
Overview of the ASW Process
Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work Samples
Context for 1st work sample
How does this artifact show where the studentis in relation to the chosen clarifying objective?
1
1
1
Overview of the ASW Process
Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work Samples
Context for 2nd work sample
How does this artifact show where the studentis in relation to the chosen clarifying objective?
2
2
2
Overview of the ASW Process
Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work Samples
Context for Growth
Describe the growth that occurred between points one and two.
1
2
1
2
1
2
Overview of the ASW Process
Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work Samples
1
2
1
2
1
2
1 Timelapse
Artifact
Overview of the ASW Process
Timelapse Artifact Option 2 – Whole Class Work Samples
Be sure to keep theWhole Class Work Samples
If the composition of yourclass changes, do not worry,submit your two work samples.
#2
Work Sample
1
Work Sample
2
1 Timelapse
Artifact
Overview of the ASW Process
Timelapse Artifact Option 2 – Whole Class Work Samples
Whole Class Work
Sample 1
Whole Class Work
Sample 2
1 Timelapse Artifact
Overview of the ASW Process
Timelapse Artifacts will be uploaded to the online platform.
TA 3Student
TA 4Student
TA 5Whole Class
TA 1 Student
TA 2 Whole Class
Overview of the ASW Process
?Questions about the previous section? Type
them in the question box now.
Principal’s Input
Ensure Teacher Participation
Principal meets with the teacher to ensure that the 5 objectives chosen use the parameters in the Strands & Standards Guidance Chart
Some examples of meetings:• PDPs• teacher meetings
Principal’s Input
The Principal is notified when a reshuffle is used by a teacher. TA 1
Principal’s Input
Blind Review:The Evidence Collection will be reviewed by 2 content area specialists.
Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2
Overview of the ASW Process
Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2
Blind Review:The platform sends the evidence collection to two reviewers who have been matched to the teacher because of their similar content area expertise.
Overview of the ASW Process
Category Rating: Meets Expected Growth
Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2
Blind Review:If the category ratings from each reviewer are the same, then the review process is complete and the Standard 6 rating will be posted for that year.
Meets Expected Growth
Overview of the ASW Process
Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2
Blind Review:If the category ratings from the two reviewers are not the same, the Evidence Collection is automatically sent to a 3rd reviewer for an additional review to get a rating for that year.
Exceeds Expected Growth
Reviewer #3
Meets Expected Growth
Overview of the ASW Process
2-Step ASW Process Review:Evidence Collection Checklist ASW Quality Rubric
Overview of the ASW Process
• D = Does Not Meet Expected Growth • M = Meets Expected Growth • E = Exceeds Expected Growth
Transfer your rating for each TA from the quality rubric to the table below:
Use this table to determine the overall rating for the evidence collection
Overall Rating for the entire Evidence Collection
Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth
Evidence Collection Rating Form:
TA 1 TA 2 TA 3 TA 4 TA 5
Does Not Meet Meets ExceedsD D D D D M M M M M E E E E ED D D D E M M M M E M E E E ED D D D M D M M M M M M E E ED D D E E M M M E E D E E E ED D D M E D D M M M D M E E ED D D M M D M M M E D D E E E D D M M E D D M E E D M M E E
Overview of the ASW Process
5 Rating Categories
1 65432Demonstrate Leadership
Establish Environment
KnowContent
Facilitate Learning
Reflect on Practice
Contribute
to Academic
Success
3 Rating CategoriesNot Demonstrated
DevelopingProficient
AccomplishedDistinguished
Overview of Standard 6
NC Educator Evaluation System
An educator receives an effectiveness status only after he or she has 3 years of data on Standard 6
A 3-year rolling average of growth data from Standard 6 is used as part of determining overall status
3-Year Rolling Average
6 6 6Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Standard Standard Standard
6 6
Contribute to Academic
Success
6Year 1
2014-2015Does Not Meet
Expected Growth
Year 22015-2016
Meets Expected Growth
Year 32016-2017
Meets Expected Growth
Standard Standard Standard
Mr. NC’s 3-year rolling average of growth data:
2014-15 Does Not Meet (Year 1)
2015-16 Meets (Year 2)+ 2016-17 Meets (Year 3)
Mr. NC’s 3-year rolling average for 2014-2017 Meets Expected Growth
Demonstration of 3-Year Rolling Average for 2014-2017
Effectiveness Status for 2016 - 2017 Effective
2016 - 2017 Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished
Standard 1 Demonstrate
leadership
Standard 2 Establish Environment
Standard 3Know Content
Standard 4Facilitate Learning
Standard 5 Reflect on Practice
Standard 6Three year rolling
average
X
X
XX
X3 year rolling average for 2014 – 2017
Meets Expected Growth
• Online Training Modules • Important Forms • Frequently Asked Questions
Visit the Wiki here: http://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/
ASW Wikispace
Regions 1 & 2 August 12
Region 3 August 19
Region 4 August 6
Region 5 August 14
Region 6 August 15
Region 7 August 21
Region 8 August 22
Combined 7 &8 August 8
Regional Training Schedule – August, 2014 (Known locations available on the ASW Wikispace)
Questions about ASW Process
Jennifer DeNeal
Race to the Top Project Coordinator for Educator Effectiveness
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
Have a question about educator effectiveness?
Send an email to:
Questions about Educator Effectiveness
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
Have a question about Educator Effectiveness?
visit
www.ncpublicschools.org/effectiveness-model
or
http://ncees.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/NCEES+Wiki