asteroseismology and exoplanets: a lesson from the sun *

7
1 Asteroseismology and Asteroseismology and exoplanets: a lesson from exoplanets: a lesson from the Sun * the Sun * Can we learn on exo-planets from Can we learn on exo-planets from asteroseismology? asteroseismology? • Metallicity of stars with planets • The origin of metals in the Sun photosphere and helioseismology. Gianni Fiorentini, Barbara Ricci, Andrea Zanzi University and INFN Ferrara on: A. Zanzi, Master Thesis, Ferrara University (2003) cussions with Castellani Ortolani Paterno’

Upload: ajaxe

Post on 20-Mar-2016

54 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Asteroseismology and exoplanets: a lesson from the Sun *. Gianni Fiorentini, Barbara Ricci, Andrea Zanzi University and INFN Ferrara. Can we learn on exo-planets from asteroseismology? Metallicity of stars with planets The origin of metals in the Sun photosphere and helioseismology. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Asteroseismology and exoplanets: a lesson from the Sun *

1

Asteroseismology and Asteroseismology and exoplanets: a lesson from the exoplanets: a lesson from the

Sun *Sun *

• Can we learn on exo-planets Can we learn on exo-planets from asteroseismology?from asteroseismology?

• Metallicity of stars with planets• The origin of metals in the Sun

photosphere and helioseismology.

Gianni Fiorentini, Barbara Ricci, Andrea Zanzi University and INFN Ferrara

*based on: A. Zanzi, Master Thesis, Ferrara University (2003)and discussions with Castellani Ortolani Paterno’

Page 2: Asteroseismology and exoplanets: a lesson from the Sun *

2

The Chicken The Chicken and the Egg and the Egg dilemmadilemma

• Stars hosting planets look more metal rich.

• The metal content in the convective envelope of a solar type star with Z=0.016 is

MZ=120 Mearth

• To reach Z=0.024 an extra 60 Mearth are needed.

• Is the excess metallicity primordial or a result of accretion?

• Is it a surface/ bulksurface/ bulk effect ?ZZintint < or > Z < or > Zphph

• Need a look at the stellar interior: asteroseismology is the natural tool

Laws et al. Astro-ph/0302111Z=0.024Z=0.016

Fe/H

Page 3: Asteroseismology and exoplanets: a lesson from the Sun *

3

Dirty solar models• The Sun is a natural laboratory•Matter is falling onto the Sun (and presumably more was falling in the past)•The SSM (without accretion) has been accurately tested with helioseismology (& neutrinos)•Build solar models starting wih a lower metacillity and assume metal accretion occurs (shortly) after ZAMS.

• How much material How much material can have accreted can have accreted without spoiling the without spoiling the agreement with agreement with helioseismology helioseismology (& neutrinos) ? (& neutrinos) ?

Page 4: Asteroseismology and exoplanets: a lesson from the Sun *

4

The lesson of diffusion

• SSM are in excellent agreement with helioseismology (for u, Yph, Rb…) when diffusion is included.

• The effect of diffusion is that Zph=0.9 Zint.

• This means that helioseismology is sensitive to changing by 10% the metal mass in the convective envelope, i.e. to 12Mearth

11 33

SSM-SUN

NO-DIFF

DIFF

SUN-MOD

Page 5: Asteroseismology and exoplanets: a lesson from the Sun *

5

Dirty solar models

• With respect to SSM, a dirty Sun is metal poor in the interior.

• molecular weight and opacity are changed

• Temperature, sound speed, Yph (&) can be changed

Page 6: Asteroseismology and exoplanets: a lesson from the Sun *

6

• Can study the changement of several observables (sound speed, Yph, Rb, Tc)

• Helioseismic observables imply:

MZ <20 MEarth (at 3)

• [Boron neutrino flux gives MZ <30 MEarth ]

Constraints from helioseismology and neutrino

Mz [MEarth]0 10 20 30

SSM

SSM

Page 7: Asteroseismology and exoplanets: a lesson from the Sun *

7

Helioseismology and Asteroseismology

α Cen A astro-ph/0107099

Sun

• Heliosesimology is sensitive to O(10) Mearth

• For asteroseismology we need For asteroseismology we need sensitivity to O(100) Msensitivity to O(100) Mearthearth

• We are planning simulations ( which frequencies? Which accuracy ? )

• Asterosesismology can prove accretion theory:

Zint< Zph

• Howevever it cannot disprove it (if accretion occurred before ZAMS) .