asset governance and architecture debt ian koenig july 2011

20
Asset Governance and Architecture Debt Ian Koenig July 2011

Upload: leonard-carson

Post on 04-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Asset Governance and Architecture Debt

Ian KoenigJuly 2011

Copyright © 2011 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.2

Context and Problem

Reed Elsevier is the parent of LexisNexis• LexisNexis is a leading global provider of content-enabled workflow

solutions designed for professionals in the legal market employing 10,300 staff in 50 countries

• Reed Elsevier revenue in 2010 = £6.1b• LexisNexis Legal and Professional contributed 28% = £1.7b• 55% of the revenue comes from the U.S.

Copyright © 2011 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.3

What happens if you are not careful

Time

Operational Expense (OpEx)Maintenance (M&R)

Investm

ent

Co

st

Investm

ent

Investm

ent

Investm

ent

Inv

es

tme

nt

Investm

ent

Investm

ent

Investm

ent

Architecture Debt

Gartner estimates current IT Debt in the U.S at $500B and rising.

Copyright © 2011 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.4

Architecture Debt – An Analogy

Copyright © 2011 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.5

Highway Policies / Golden Rules

Copyright © 2011 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.6

IT Debt (Maintenance Debt)

Copyright © 2011 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.7

Architecture Debt – An Analogy

Copyright © 2011 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.8

Architecture Debt – An Analogy

Copyright © 2011 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.9

Architecture Debt – An Analogy

Copyright © 2011 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.10

Architecture Debt – An Analogy

Architecture Debt

Copyright © 2011 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.11

Architecture Debt – An Analogy

Deviation Expense

Copyright © 2011 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.12

0 1 2 3 4 5 60

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

Deviation Opex

Deviation M&R

Deviation Build

Opex

M&R

Build

Optimal Cost: ~2.7M + 800K/year (OpEx + M&R) = $7.5MAdditional cost of deviation: 2.2M + 275K/year = $3.6M

24%

Cost & Payback of Infrastructure Debt / Deviation for a system

Copyright © 2011 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.13

Golden Rules for Technology

I. Masters of DataII. ModularIII. SimpleIV. Standards-basedV. Compliant

VI. Secure VII. ScalableVIII. ManageableIX. Reliable X. Global  XI. Maintainable

Copyright © 2011 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.14

Compliance to Golden Rules are measured through a scorecard

The scorecard contains the detailed tests defining compliance to the Golden Rules

Copyright © 2011 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.15

Debt Dashboard – Strategic

Assets Debt $(000)

Masters of Data

Modular

Simple

Standards-base

d

Compliant

Secure

Scalable

Manageable

Reliable

Global

Maintainable

Budget (end'11)

(000)

Product Application Product Application 1 350-700 33,600

Product Application 2 2-10 800Product Delivery Platform Service 1 10-25 24,800 Service 2 9,400 Service 3 30-50 200 Service 4 400 9,600Content Fabrication Platform Service 1 200 10,000 Service 2 57.5 13,300 Service 3 1,000 52,800Infrastructure Service 1 0 1,300 Service 2 0 1,200

Copyright © 2011 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.16

Debt Dashboard – Legacy Systems

Overall Score

Assets

Debt $(000)Masters of

Data

Modular

Simple

Standard

s-base

d

Compliant

Secure

Scalable

Manageable

Reliable

Global

Maintainabl

e

Legacy Platform Application 1 50 - 100 Application 2 10,500 Application 3 25

Copyright © 2011 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.17

Architecture Debt – Application 2

  PrincipleDebt ('000)

In Plan ('000) Gap Comment

1 Masters of Data 900 900 0   Some of our data will need to document and clarify organizational business ownership .

2 Modular     0   A large number of waivers apply based on leveraging out of the box COTS capabilities. 

3 Simple     0   No concerns

4 Standards Based 100   100   Process waivers.  Adoption of process and deliverables will resolve these architecture concerns.

5 Compliant 50   50   Add copyright language to source code.

6 Secure     0   No concerns

7 Scalable 1,500   1,500   Extensive work needed to build out scalability of this Asset

8 Manageable     0   Need to Implement business critical logging and component monitoring.

9 Reliable 4,500 4,500 0   Effort needed for DR plans. Resolve single points of failure.

10 Global 3,300 2,400 900   Investment needed to bring asset up to global ready status.

11 Maintainable 50   50   Document schemas and firm up lifecycle processes.

  Golden Rule Debt

10,400 7,800 2,600  

  Infrastructure Debt

0 0 0  

Copyright © 2011 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.18

Corporate Impact

Operating Income

Time to Market

Customer Care Cost

Investors’ Value

Market Share

Brand

RISK

Arc

hit

ec

ture

De

bt

Copyright © 2011 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.19

APPENDIX

Copyright © 2011 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.20

STA

RT

DestinationYou arehere

Death by Governance

Don’t overshoot

SOA Requires Governance

Asset Governance is a (1) Process with checks & balances and (2) People with defined decision rights, measuring compliance with a set of (3) Policies, producing (4) Metrics so that good business decisions

can be made involving technology and full adherence may be achieved in the fullness of time

SOA by its nature enables a federated development process with individual groups producing individual services relatively independently.

This enables scale (supporting agility) , but requires trust. Only via a well defined set of interface guidelines, policies and a Governance process can you keep complexity under control.