arlington, virginia. april 3-5, 2013. 28th annual ... annual intellectual property law conference....

24
28th Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference. April 3-5, 2013. Arlington, Virginia. ABA Section of Intellectual Property Law Early registration deadline: 3/15/13

Upload: truonghanh

Post on 20-May-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

28th

Ann

ual I

ntel

lect

ual P

rope

rty

Law

Con

fere

nce.

Apr

il 3-

5, 2

013.

Arl

ingt

on, V

irgi

nia.

ABA Section of Intellectual Property Law

Earlyregistration deadline: 3/15/13

HIGHLIGHTS

In a world where value is key, every IP practitioner needs avenues for their own innovation. By attending, the 28th Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference, you’ll gain knowledge on the latest industry information through dynamic CLE programing and innovative networking events.

Glean insight and ideas from IP experts and practitioners, coming together from around the world to share and discuss the most critical issues in IP law. You’ll have your choice of multiple networking events including the Young Lawyers Reception, the LGBT Diversity Reception, the International Networking Luncheon, the Special Section Reception and more.

The 28th Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference provides the most cost-effective value—offering over 30 CLE sessions in three days of programming. Our programs address the latest issues and developments in IP Law and provide opportunities to earn enough CLE credits for an entire year.

What IP Lawyers Need To Know

A day of Professional Practice Workshops on

Wednesday, April 3 featuring a number of educational

workshop programs, accredited for CLE credit:

ABA-IPL Academy: IP and Technology

Send in the Troops! Stopping Worldwide Trademark Counterfeits

New Patent World Post AIA

Trademark and Copyright Enforcement on Social Media

Keeping Trade Secrets in a World of Social Media and Cloud Computing

Jump-Starting Careers in IP Law

CLE28

th A

nnua

l Int

elle

ctua

l Pro

pert

y La

w C

onfe

renc

e. A

pril

3-5,

201

3. A

rlin

gton

, Vir

gini

a. C

ryst

al G

atew

ay M

arri

ott.

3

HIGHLIGHTS

America Invents Act: First 120 Days

Smartphones & the Patent Battleground

Illusive Copyright Termination Rights

gTLD: Is That .Yours or .Mine?

Frontiers of Trade Dress Law

21st Century China IP Law

IP Ethics: Fraud in the Wake of Therasense

Staying on Top of Patent Infringement

Copyright Fair Use

Rights of Publicity for Entertainers and Athletes

Strategies and Skills for Patent Examiner Interviews

Effective Prosecution of Trademark Applications

Tips for Practice Before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

Revisiting Federal Circuit Past Damages Precedents

The advance registration deadline is March 15, 2013.

Register early to receive the discounted rate. We hope to

see you at the 28th Intellectual Property Law Conference.

In cooperation with the ABA Section of Science & Technology Law, the ABA Forum on the Entertainment & Sports Industries and the Copyright Society of the USA.

3

CLE

Section Committee, Board and Council

Meetings

7:30a – 5:30p Registration

10:30a – 12:00p Concurrent Workshops Patent: Working at the Edge of Settlement/ADR:

What You Can and Cannot Do Trademark: Send in the Troops! How to Stop Trademark

Counterfeits Successfully Worldwide Patent: Protection for Computer-Related Inventions Professional Skills: ABA-IPL Skills Academy:

IP and Technology

12:00p – 1:00p International Networking Luncheon (Complimentary)

1:00p – 2:30p Concurrent Workshops Patent: Hot Topics in Patent Damages: Deconstructing

Apple v. Motorola, Should The Federal Circuit Revisit Its Precedents on Past Damages?

Trademark & Copyright: IP Protection in a Networked World: Copyright and Trademark Enforcement in Social Media

Patent: Pay-For-Delay Settlement Agreements: Are Pharma Companies Playing by a Different Set of Rules?

Patent: What is the Future of RAND/FRAND Licensing?

3:00p – 4:30p Concurrent Workshops Patent: New Patent World Post AIA: What Has Changed? Trademark & Copyright: Dear Congress, Do No Harm

to the Internet: An Update on Anti-Piracy and Anti-Counterfeiting Legislative Efforts

Trade Secrets: Keeping Trade Secrets in the Age of Social Media and Cloud Computing

Professional Skills: Restart & Refocus: Transitioning into & Jumpstarting your Non-Traditional Career in IP Law

4:30p – 6:00p LGBT Diversity Reception (Complimentary)

6:00p – 7:30p Young Lawyers Networking Reception (Complimentary)

7:30p – 9:30p Women in IP Law Dinner (Ticket Required)

wedapril3

VIEWconference

OVER

Tuesday, April 2 9:30a – 10:30a Officers Meeting 11:00a – 5:00p Registration 11:00a – 12:30p Visibility Task Force 1:00p – 5:00p Council Meeting 6:30p – 9:30p Council Dinner (Invite Only)

4

regi

ster

: ww

w.a

mba

r.org

/ipl

sprin

g201

3

5

thursapril4 friapril5

Wednesday, April 3 7:30a – 5:00p Committee Meetings 9:00a – 10:00a Sponsorship Committee Meeting 9:30a – 12:30p Books Editorial Board Meeting 12:30p – 2:30p Magazine Editorial Board Meeting 1:30p – 2:30p CLE Board 2:30p – 4:30p Content Advisory Board

Thursday, April 4 7:00a – 5:00p Committee Meetings

Friday, April 5 7:00a – 5:00p Committee Meetings 9:00a – 11:45a Long Range Planning Meeting 2:00p – 4:00p Membership Board Meeting

5

7:00a – 5:00p Registration 7:00a – 8:00a IP Law Breakfast (Ticket Required)

8:30a – 10:00a Concurrent Programs Patent: Patentability Trials of the AIA –

The First 120 Days Trademark: The Blonde, the Red Shoe, the

Round-Cornered Rectangles: Debating the Frontiers of Trade Dress Law

10:00a – 10:15a Break

10:15a – 11:45a Concurrent Programs Patent: New Infringement Case Law –

Staying Ahead of the Curve Trademark: Tips for Practice Before the

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

11:45a – 12:00p Break

12:00p – 1:30p Keynote Luncheon (Ticket Required)

1:45p – 3:15p Concurrent Programs Patent: Patent Procurement in the Age of

Harmonization: Strategies for Building a Solid Global Patent Portfolio

Trademark: Is that Domain .Yours or .Mine?: Coping with the New Top Level Domain Names

Copyright: The Elusive Termination Right: Where Does it Stand? Sponsored by the Copyright Society of the USA

3:15p – 3:30p Break

3:30p – 5:00p Concurrent Programs Science & Technology: Smartphones and

the Patent Battleground Sponsored by the ABA Section of Science and Technology Law

Trademark: What Do I Gotta Do to Be Famous Around Here? An Examination of Recent Trends in Federal Dilution Law

International Copyright: International Copyright Law Developments: A Review of the Recent and Possible New Treaties

5:00p – 6:00p Opportunities for Publishing with the ABA-IPL Section: Wine Reception (Complimentary)

6:30p – 9:30p Special Section Reception (Ticket Required)

7:30a – 5:00p Registration 7:00a – 8:30a Continental Breakfast

8:30a – 10:00a Concurrent Programs Patent: When Should Patent Owners Be

Required to Reduce the Number of Asserted Claims and Select Claims for Trial?

Copyright: Copyright Infringement in Patent Prosecution: Might Your Firm Be the Next Litigation Target?

Entertainment & Sports: Rights of Publicity for Entertainers and Athletes Sponsored by the ABA Forum on the Entertainment & Sports Industries

10:00a – 10:15a Break

10:15a – 11:45a Concurrent Programs Patent: Patent Examiner Interviewing:

Strategies and Skills Trademark: When a Personal Touch Matters:

Prosecuting Trademark Applications ADR: The International Institute for Conflict

Prevention and Resolution: “Effective Practices Protocol” for Patent Mediation

11:45a – 12:00p Break

12:00p – 1:30p Keynote Luncheon (Ticket Required)

1:45p – 3:15p Concurrent Programs Trademark: The Expanding Madrid System:

a Practical and Comparative Evaluation International: China in the 21st Century:

New Laws Proposed on Copyright, Patent and Competition

Ethics: Fraud on the US Patent and Trademark Office: Has the Plague of Inequitable Conduct Been Eradicated?

3:15p – 3:30p Break

3:30p – 5:00p Concurrent Programs Patent: Aggrandizing “Petty Innovation”:

The Growing Use of Utility Models Copyright: The Future of Copyright and Fair Use Ethics: From the Inside Looking Out: An In-House

Counsel Perspective on US International Trade Commission Investigations

CO

NF

ER

EN

CE

OV

ER

VIE

W

Wednesday, April 3 4:30p – 6:00p

Hosted by the ABA-IPL Diversity Action Group, join us for a high- energy networking reception open to all. Held in the ABA-IPL “Night Club” (Bin 1700 of Crystal Gateway Marriott) the club atmosphere provides a welcoming environment for LGBT IP professionals, students, friends and allies to share a few drinks, listen to some jazz, and strike up conversations.

Wednesday, April 3 6:00p – 7:30p

The ABA-IPL Young Lawyers Action Group welcomes you to this fun kick-off event. Enjoy cocktails, hors d’oeuvers and the chance to prove your brain and motor skills in 60 seconds as Minute to Win It comes to the ABA-IPL Section. Team up and compete with your IP colleagues to face what seems to be the simplest of tasks with household items under 60 seconds. Can you transport a toothbrush with a baseball cap using the brushes’ bristles? Come and play or stay and mingle. The fun can be had by all, as this event is open to all conference attendees. However, all young lawyers, new members, and first-time attendees are especially encouraged to attend this free social event.

LGBT Diversity Reception (Complimentary)

Young Lawyers Reception (Complimentary)

JOIN

TOG

ETHE

R

6

7

Wednesday, April 3 7:30p – 9:30p

This dinner offers the opportunity for women leaders in the IP law profession and others to gather and network in an informal and relaxed setting. All are welcome to attend this special dinner celebrating women in IP law.

Wednesday, April 3International Networking Luncheon12:00p – 1:00p Bonjour, Guten Tag, Ciào, Hola, Li-ho… Begin the conference by saying “Hello” in your language during this newly added networking event for promoting International IP relationships. Both national and international attendees will have the opportunity to discuss the latest IP global issues and challenges. Various international cuisines will be served. Take the opportunity to meet overseas colleagues, share experiences and explore the potential for practicing International IP law.

Thursday, April 4 Keynote Luncheon: 12:00p – 1:30pSteven W. Miller Vice President General CounselThe Procter & Gamble Co.

Friday, April 5Keynote Luncheon: 12:00p – 1:30p Richard L. RaineyExecutive Counsel IP LitigationGeneral Electric Company

(Tickets are required for the Thursday and Friday Luncheons)

IP Law Breakfast (Ticketed Event)

Thursday, April 4 7:00a – 8:00a

Get an early start to your day with breakfast. Before heading to a full day of CLE programs, come have some breakfast to maintain your highest energy levels throughout the day. When you come, be prepared to be entertained and wake up with some laughs and conversations.

Opportunities for Publishing with the ABA-IPL Section: Wine Reception (Complimentary)

Thursday, April 4 5:00p – 6:00p

Immediately following the day’s programming there

will be a reception hosted by members of the Section’s Books Editorial Board to highlight publishing opportunities with ABA-IPL—featuring the Section’s new authors and book titles. All conference attendees are invited to participate!

Special Section Reception(Ticketed Event)

Thursday, April 4 6:30p – 9:30p

Maximize your time at the conference by networking with IP professionals and attend the Special Section Reception. Take a trip to an off-site location for the opportunity to get out and explore the area and enjoy cocktails and hors d’oeuvres. All conference participants and their guests are invited to join us after a full day of educational programming. Transportation will be provided to the off-site location. More details will be shared closer to the event. This is a networking reception you will not want to miss, so reserve your ticket now, as space will be limited.

Women in IP Law Dinner (Ticketed Event)

Special Luncheon Events

Twitter #iplspringFollow us!

JO

IN T

OG

ET

HE

R

8

7:30a – 5:30p Registration

Wednesday April 3

10:30a – 12:00p CONCURRENT W O R K S H O P S

I. Working at the Edge of Settlement/ADR: What You Can and Cannot Do

II. Trademark: Send in the Troops! How to Stop Trademark Counterfeits Successfully Worldwide

III. Protection for Computer-Related Inventions

IV. ABA-IPL Skills Academy: IP and Technology

Courts and lawyer participants for a successful settlement/ADR proceeding run into conflict of dispute resolution when concepts are introduced that create public policy turmoil. Two compelling examples include: the use of attorney client advice to prevent impediments; and “add” to mutual understanding and acceptance and attempts at “no challenge” provisions/covenants not to sue to resolve issues. In this program, these issues and other risky alternatives will be discussed and explored for their appropriateness and necessity for reaching “Yes”.

Despite growing anti-counterfeit activities by companies and joint initiatives with trademark owners, problems continue to arise when fighting against counterfeit and gray market goods. The rejection of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) by the European Union continues to cause major setbacks in international efforts to master the piracy problem. In this program, International IP practitioners will provide an overview of one of the “classic” anti-counterfeiting activities; namely customs enforcement measures in the US, Latin America, the European Union and Asia, while providing practical advice for trademark owners and their legal counsel to deal with the specifics of these actions.

Intellectual property law is continually striving to keep up with the latest developments in computer technology. When it comes to the international system, the law is fragmented and diverse in relation to the level of protection available for computer technology in the US. In this program, a panel of IP practitioners from Europe, Japan, Korea, China, and Australia will compare their respective systems and provide a comparison with the US. The panel will explore common themes and discuss a suitable international strategy. Current topics will also be covered including, patenting in the finance and telecoms arena; patenting features of internal operation of the computer, and apps for apps—patenting smartphone applications.

The ABA-IPL Skills Academy is designed for introducing all IP lawyers to the necessary, practical and sometimes overlooked skills needed to be an efficient IP lawyer in any setting. The first in the series will focus on using various tablet technologies for improving your practice. The presentation will focus on how to execute many tasks of an IP lawyer on your tablet computer (iPad, Google Nexus, Samsung Galaxy and Surface-Windows 8), Topics will also include presenting a CLE presentation, retainers, best apps to use, data security and other best practices. This program is intended to be an “ask anything” discussion on a variety of technology topics from the simplest of tasks to the more complicated processes. An interactive component will also be included, so all participants are encouraged to bring their tablets.

Moderator: Suzanne K. Nusbaum, Impartia, Los Gatos, CASpeakers: Roderick R. McKelvie, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DCMaxim H. Waldbaum, Eaton & Van Winkle, New York, NY

Moderator: Matthias Berger, Field Fisher Waterhouse, Hamburg, GermanySpeakers: Nicole B. Emmons, Baker & McKenzie, Dallas, TXCristina Guerra, Guerra, Porto Alegre, BrazilConrad W. Wong, US Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA

Moderator: Gwilym Roberts, Kilburn & Strode LLP, London, United Kingdom

Moderator: David Postolski, Day Pitney LLP, Parsippany, NJSpeakers: Carolyn Elefant, Law Offices of Carolyn Elefant, Washington, DCTom Mighell, Contoural Inc, Dallas, TXJeffrey Taylor, Absolute Legal Services, LLC, Oklahoma City, OK

12:00p – 1:00p International Networking Luncheon (Complimentary)

Trad

emar

k

Pat

ent

Pat

ent

Wednesday, April 3 has been developed as Professional Practice Day

Featuring a number of informative educational workshops, all accredited for CLE credit.

These workshops will be an ideal opportunity for interactive learning in a group setting,

and a great way to meet and interact with the program presenters.

>Professional Practice Day

Pro

fess

iona

l S

kills

9

WE

DN

ES

DA

Y

9

1:00p – 2:30p CONCURRENT W O R K S H O P S

I. Hot Topics in Patent Damages: Deconstructing Apple v. Motorola, Should The Federal Circuit Revisit Its Precedents on Past Damages?

II. IP Protection in a Networked World: Copyright and Trademark Enforcement in Social Media

III. Pay-For-Delay Settlement Agreements: Are Pharma Companies Playing by a Different Set of Rules?

IV. What is the Future of RAND/FRAND Licensing?

This timely panel discussion considers two leading topics in patent damages jurisprudence: the order on damages issued in Apple v. Motorola, and the Federal Circuit’s precedents on the availability of past damages in lawsuits involving method claims or non-practicing entities. In this program, discussion will focus on deconstructing the decision and its impact on patent damages law, including the state of the law on past damages, how the Federal Circuit’s precedents affect the value of patents and patent owners behavior, and analysis of whether current law adequately balances the rights of patent owners and infringers.

Social media provides many benefits to copyright and trademark holders. However, the sheer amount of content on social media websites is creating a landmine of potential IP issues. This program will identify ongoing concerns, such as traditional copyright, trademark infringement, and brand jacking. Discussion will focus on ways companies can proactively protect their IP interests and explore existing methods for enforcement, including potential litigation strategies.

There is a split among the Circuits regarding how to characterize pay-for-delay settlement agreements. The Federal Trade Commission is of the opinion that these settlements are anti-competitive and antitrust violations. Pharmaceutical companies rely on these types of settlements to avoid an uncertain ANDA litigation outcome and view these types of settlements as pro-competitive and a necessary part of doing business. This program will review the current case law in the area of pay-for-delay settlements and pending legislation. In addition, discussion will include examining the competing points-of-view in what is an interesting intersection between antitrust law and IP law.

Standard setting organizations (SSOs) often require firms that declare their patents as standard-essential to agree to license those patents on RAND (reasonable and nondiscriminatory) terms. When a standard-essential patent is asserted, the Court must address several issues, including whether the patent owner is entitled to injunctive relief and how to determine RAND royalties. This program will start by providing background on SSOs, standard-essential patents, and RAND licensing. Panelists will then present various opinions on the licensing and/or assertion of standard-essential patents from both a legal and economic perspective.

Moderator: Jon Graves, Cooley LLP, Reston, VA Speakers: Thomas Cotter, The University of Minnesota School of Law, Minneapolis, MN Krista Holt, GreatBridge Consulting, Washington, DCRachel Krevans, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA

Moderator: Janet Fries, Drinker, Biddle & Reath, LLP, Washington, DCSpeaker: Joshua L. Simmons, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York, NY

Moderator: Natalie M. Derzko, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DCSpeakers: Andrew D. Lazerow, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DCKevin E. Noonan, McDonnell, Boehnen, Hulbert & Berghoff LLP, Chicago, IL James J. O’Connell, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC Bruce M. Wexler, Paul Hastings LLP, New York, NY

Moderator: Justin Nelson, Susman Godfrey, LLP, Seattle, WASpeakers: Michael Dansky, Capstone Advisory Group, LLC, Boston, MASuzanne Drennon Munck, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DCNiklas Ostman, Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WASteven Pepe, Ropes & Gray, LLP, New York, NY

Trad

emar

k &

Cop

yrig

ht

Pat

ent

Pat

ent

Pat

ent

10

3:00p – 4:30p CONCURRENT W O R K S H O P S

I. New Patent World Post AIA: What Has Changed?

II. Dear Congress, Do No Harm to the Internet: An Update on Anti-Piracy and Anti-Counterfeiting Legislative Efforts

III. Keeping Trade Secrets in the Age of Social Media and Cloud Computing

IV. Restart & Refocus: Transitioning into & Jumpstarting your Non-Traditional Career in IP Law

President Obama signed the America Invents Act (“AIA”), marking the first fundamental patent reform in the US since the 1952 Patent Act. Under the AIA, these changes came into effect over an eighteen month time period with the final changes becoming effective in 2013. This program will provide insight and guidance for understanding the provisions of the AIA and their impact. Various aspects of the AIA including; changes in US patent law and how these changes affect US patent practice will also be discussed and explored.

In January 2012, website blackouts by Wikipedia and Google over bills proposed in Congress to remedy online piracy and counterfeiting by foreign sites dominated the news. The blackouts raised questions about DNS blocking potentially causing Internet security breaches (that it would “break the Internet”), among others. This panel will examine the validity of the arguments raised about “breaking the Internet,” and will examine voluntary actions undertaken by several Internet companies as potential alternatives to proposing new legislation. Any new legislative proposals addressing online counterfeiting or piracy that are introduced in Congress before April 2013 will also be addressed.

Internet and social media use by companies is engrained in daily business routines. Within these practices, companies continue to rely upon their trade secrets and confidential information/data to distinguish themselves in the marketplace. However, what was once the company’s prized trade secret can now be compromised with the click of a mouse. Businesses and the courts continue to struggle with addressing these difficult issues and reconciling these competing interests. In this program, learn how courts across the country are addressing these issues and how businesses can best position themselves to protect valuable information and still reap the benefits of social media and cloud computing.

During a prolonged downturn in legal employment and severe cutbacks in the purchase of legal services by corporations and potential clients, many IP lawyers are exploring non-traditional employment options. In this program, our panel of experienced practitioners will showcase a variety of career opportunities available to IP lawyers and provide real-world advice on alternate career paths. Questions will help shape discussion: ask them live or submit them in advance to [email protected].

Moderator: MaCharri R. Vorndran-Jones, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, INSpeakers: Robert A. Armitage, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, INThomas L. Irving, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC Donna M. Meuth, Eisai Inc., Andover, MA

Moderator: Ralph Oman, George Washington University Law School, Washington, DCSpeakers: Jennifer Choe Groves, Eckert, Seamans, Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Washington, DC Jaclyn Suzanne Louis, Senior Legislative Assistant for Congressman Steve Chabot, Washington, DC Ronald C. Wheeler, Fox Entertainment Group, Los Angeles, CA

Moderator: H. Alan Rothenbuecher, Ice Miller, LLP, Cleveland, OHSpeakers: Robert Milligan, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Los Angeles, CAJoshua Salinas, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Los Angeles, CALisa K. Seilheimer, CDW Corporation, Vernon Hills, ILGail Sharps Myers, US Foods, Inc., Rosemont, IL

Moderator: Sharra S. Brockman, Verv, Pittsburgh, PASpeaker: Mary E. Rasenberger, Cowan, DeBaets, Abrahams & Sheppard LLP, New York, NY

4:30p – 6:00p LGBT Diversity Reception (Complimentary)

6:00p – 7:30p Young Lawyers Networking Reception (Complimentary)

7:30p – 9:30p Women in IP Law Dinner (Ticket Required)

Trad

e S

ecre

ts

Pat

ent

Pro

fess

iona

l S

kills

Trad

emar

k &

Cop

yrig

ht

Wednesday April 3 continued.

11

7:00a – 5:00p Registration

7:00a – 8:00a IP Law Breakfast (Ticket Required)

11

8:30a – 10:00a C O N C U R R E N T P R O G R A M S

I. Patentability Trials of the AIA—The First 120 Days

II. The Blonde, the Red Shoe, the Round- Cornered Rectangles: Debating the Frontiers of Trade Dress Law xxxxxxxx

By April 2013, the first wave of Inter Partes Review and Covered Business Method Patent Challenges will be ongoing at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). This program will be moderated by PTAB judges, US Patent and Trademark Office officials, and practitioners for the purpose of providing lessons learned from the first wave of filings, practice tips, and an outlook on the perceived impact of these proceedings relative to patent litigation and patent licensing activities.

What do Marilyn Monroe, Louboutin shoes and the iPhone have in common? All have been given trade dress status by a district court, a federal appeals court, and a jury. These decisions, by both courts and juries have defied the expectations of many and prompted the question—did they reach the right result? This program will explore this issue in a lively debate with expert practitioners analyzing these cases as advocates for and against trade dress protection.

Moderator: Robert Titus, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, INSpeakers: Scott Mckeown, Oblon, Spivak, McCelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, Alexandria, VATeresa Stanek Rea, US Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VAHon. Michael Tierney, Board of Patent Appeals and Interference, US Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA

Moderator: Hon. Linda Kuczma, US Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, Alexandria, VASpeakers: Edward Colbert, Kenyon & Kenyon, Washington, DC (invited)

J. Kevin Fee, Morgan Lewis, Washington, DC (invited)

Christine Haight Farley, American University, Washington College of Law, Washington, DC Gregory Gilchrist, Kirkpatrick Townsend, San Francisco, CA (invited)

Trad

emar

k

Pat

ent

Thursday April 4 T

HU

RS

DA

Y

12

10:15a – 11:45a C O N C U R R E N T P R O G R A M S

I. New Infringement Case Law—Staying Ahead of the Curve

II. Tips for Practice Before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

Within the last several years, the law concerning patent infringement has seen significant changes, most recently in the area of divided and inducement infringement. With the help of a distinguished panel, this program will provide a detailed explanation and update on the recent changes to the law of patent infringement, including practical tips and advice on how best to deal with these changes when managing patent litigation. Specific topics to be discussed include the law of divided and inducement infringement in light of the Federal Circuit’s en banc decision in Akamai McKesson, and the Supreme Court’s decision in Global-Tech v. SEB, and their implications on patent licensing.

Perspectives of experienced outside and in-house counsel will feature a review of common procedural issues and mistakes in practice before the Trademark Trial & Appeal Board. In this program, topics will include; docketing dates, brief formatting, discovery conferences, consented extensions of time, requests for reconsideration, motions to compel discovery, summary judgment, electronic discovery, fraudulent evidence, affirmative defenses, proper pleading of fraud, proper pleading of dilution, introducing testimony, preserving objections, trial of issues by consent, evidence for proving a mark is famous, ACR, and oral hearings.

Moderator: Jonathan Muenkel, Life Technologies Corp., Carlsbad, CASpeakers: Daryl Joseffer, King & Spalding, Washington, DCDeanne Maynard, Morrison & Foerster, Washington, DCHon. Paul R. Michel, Former Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Moderator: Erik Pelton, Erik M. Pelton & Associates, Falls Church, VASpeakers: Pamela Mallari, Coca-Cola, Atlanta, GA (invited)

Linda McLeod, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DCAaron Silverstein, Saunders & Silverstein, Amesbury, MA

12:00p – 1:30p Keynote Luncheon (Ticket Required)

Trad

emar

k

Pat

ent

Thursday April 4 continued.

Featured Luncheon Speaker:

Steven W. Miller Vice President General CounselThe Procter & Gamble Co.

Committee Meeting Opportunities A number of ABA-IPL committees will be holding meetings throughout the conference. This is a great opportunity for members of those committees to get together and interact face to face as they discuss issues and plan strategies. These meetings are also a great opportunity for anyone interested in joining one of those committees to meet chairs and other members. New members are always welcome. Full information on committee meetings, and schedules will be available on the Section website nearer to the date of the conference at www.americanbar.org/iplaw. Please note that conference registration is a pre-requisite for participating in committee meetings.

1313

1:45p – 3:15p C O N C U R R E N T P R O G R A M S

I. Patent Procurement in the Age of Harmonization: Strategies for Building a Solid Global Patent Portfolio

II. Is that Domain .Yours or .Mine?: Coping with the New Top Level Domain Names

III. The Elusive Termination Right: Where Does it Stand? Sponsored by the Copyright Society of the USA

Navigating various foreign jurisdictions to obtain biotech, chemical and pharmaceutical patent coverage that meets business objectives can be challenging. This program will examine common issues faced, including timing of voluntary amendments, written description requirements, and utility requirements in various international jurisdictions. In addition to discussing the issues, strategies for preparing these types of patent applications for obtaining the best global coverage while avoiding common traps encountered during prosecution abroad will also be explored. Discussion will then conclude with a review of harmonization issues in the face of the new America Invents Act.

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) published a list of over 1,900 applications for new top level domains. Some large brand owners applied for domain names, which mirror their trademarks, but many have not. In addition, there were domain names, such as .app and .inc that received multiple applicants. Given these results, the dispute resolution procedure during evaluation is of vital importance to brand owners. This program will review the status of the ICANN gTLD program, while providing an in-depth look at how the procedures work, what has happened to date, and how the procedures can be used to a rights holder’s advantage.

In the Copyright Act of 1976 Congress extended the term of copyright protection and included two termination of transfer provisions that give authors the benefit of the extension. Since 1976, many factors have changed when it comes to the termination right. Where the termination right stands today including, when it is available, and how effective it is to the terminating author or his/her heirs will be presented in this program. Discussion will focus on the background of termination history/mechanics, renegotiation issues, recapture—the limitations on what is/is not recaptured, and the latest on hot topics such as, termination of “master” recordings in the music industry and (other) “work for hire” disputes.

Moderator: Jake Wasserman, Pfizer, Cambridge, MASpeakers: Chris Benson, Harrison Goddard Foote, Manchester, EnglandKeisha Hylton-Rodic, Drinker, Biddle & Reath LLP, Washington DCLisa Mueller, Michael Best & Friedrich LLP, Chicago, ILIngrid Vander Elst, Torys LLP, Toronto, Canada

Moderator: Rick Sanders, Aaron Sanders, PLLC, Nashville, TNSpeakers: John McElwaine, Nelson Mullins, Charleston, SCJohn McKeown, Cassels Brock, Toronto, CanadaChrissie Scelsi, Bohemia Interactive Simulations, Inc., Orlando, FL

Moderator: Eric J. Schwartz, Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP, Washington, DCSpeakers: Richard Dannay, Cowan, Leibowitz & Latman, P.C., New York, NYLita T. Rosario, WYZ Girl Entertainment Consulting, LLC, Washington, DCRoger Zissu, Fross, Zelnick, Lehrman & Zissu, P.C., New York, NY

Trad

emar

k

Cop

yrig

ht

Pat

ent

TH

UR

SD

AY

register: www.ambar.org/iplspring2013

14

3:30p – 5:00p C O N C U R R E N T P R O G R A M S

I. Smartphones and the Patent Battleground Sponsored by the ABA Section of Science and Technology Law

II. What Do I Gotta Do to Be Famous Around Here? An Examination of Recent Trends in Federal Dilution Law xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

III. International Copyright Law Developments: A Review of the Recent and Possible New Treaties

Major smartphone platforms and the supporting companies are fighting for survival, just as billions of smartphone users increasingly become dependent on these devices. The patent battleground in the smartphone wars continues to grow, prompting the key questions of ‘will the winner take all’ or will the marketplace be shared. In this program, discussion will focus on patent strategies used by smartphone competitors, the role of standards essential patents in smartphone litigation, and the advantages and disadvantages of smartphone litigation in the US Federal Courts, before the International Trade Commission or in foreign venues.

Over the past year, several decisions have come down from the district and appellate courts, as well as the TTAB making it abundantly clear that pursuing federal dilution claims can sometimes be a surprising and humbling experience. COACH™ is not a famous mark. MR. CHARBUCKS coffee doesn’t dilute the STARBUCKS™ mark, but the CRACKBERRY website dilutes the BLACKBERRY™ brand? The brief appearance of a basketball with Louis Vuitton-like logos not only dilutes the brand, but also gives rise to enhanced damages based on willfullness. This program featuring a panel of expert IP practitioners and scholars, will discuss the seemingly unpredictable world of dilution jurisprudence. During this interactive discussion, these and other recent cases to discern the patterns driving these decisions will be examined. Within the discussion, tips will be offered on how to best evaluate and pursue (or defend against) dilution cases.

This program will cover a review of developments at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR). Discussion will also include the possible WIPO instrument on copyright limitations and exceptions for the visually impaired and other top multilateral developments.

Moderator: Phyllis Turner-Brimm, Intellectual Ventures, Bellevue, WASpeakers: Roger G. Brooks, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, NYAdam Mossoff, George Mason University School of Law, Arlington, VAAlex Rogers, Qualcomm, San Diego, CA

Moderator: Tony Biller, Coats & Bennett PLLC, Cary, North Carolina (invited)

Speakers: Anne Gundelfinger, Law Offices of Anne Gundelfinger, Menlo Park, CA (invited)

David Hosp, Goodwin Procter, Boston, MARodney C. Pratt, Nike, Inc., Beaverton, OR (invited) Rebecca Tushnet, Georgetown School of Law, Washington, DC (invited)

David Welkowitz, Whittier Law School, Costa Mesa, CA (invited)

Moderators: Daniel Gervais, Vanderbilt University School of Law, Nashville, TNEric Schwartz, Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP, Washington, DCSpeakers: Maria Pallante, US Register of Copyrights, Washington, DC (invited)

Ernesto M. Rubi, Carey Rodriguez Greenberg O’Keefe LLP, Miami, FL (invited)

Andrea Rush, Heenan Blaikie, Toronto, CanadaMichael Schlesinger, Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP, Washington, DCMark F. Schultz, Southern Illinois University School of Law, Carbondale, IL

5:00p – 6:00p Opportunities for Publishing with ABA-IPL Section: Wine Reception (Complimentary)

6:30p – 9:30p Special Section Reception (Ticket Required)

Trad

emar

k

Inte

rnat

iona

l C

opyr

ight

Sci

ence

&

Tech

nolo

gy

Thursday April 4 continued.

1515

FR

IDA

Y

7:30a – 5:00p Registration

7:00a – 8:30a Continental Breakfast

8:30a – 10:00a C O N C U R R E N T P R O G R A M S

I. When Should Patent Owners Be Required to Reduce the Number of Asserted Claims and Select Claims for Trial? xxxxx

II. Copyright Infringement in Patent Prosecution: Might Your Firm Be the Next Litigation Target?

III. Rights of Publicity for Entertainers and Athletes Sponsored by the ABA Forum on the Entertainment & Sports Industries

One of the most fervently contested issues in patent litigation today is the timing and process for reducing the number of claims asserted in cases where patent owners initially assert a large number of patent claims. In this program, an experienced panel of IP practitioners will review and explore recent district court decisions on narrowing asserted claims, discuss the trends, and provide recommendations for successfully addressing claim limitation.

Four patent prosecution firms were sued in 2012 for copyright infringement by two STM publishers, who alleged that the copies of journal articles made and submitted as a part of each firm’s information disclosure obligation infringed the copyrights of the STM publishers. Are these cases outliers, or is this the beginning of a new trend? In this program, a panel representing the perspectives of patent prosecution firms, the STM publishers, their licensing agent for the Copyright Clearance Center, and the US Patent and Trademark Office will examine the issues and offer insight on the arguments, the business forces driving these cases, and risk management strategies for law firms that may be future targets.

One of the more valuable assets a celebrity or athlete may possess is his or her identity or persona. How does one protect the use of his or her persona from wrongful appropriation? What limits apply to that protection? In this program, panelists will provide an overview of the right of publicity laws as it applies to entertainers and athletes. Recent cases will be reviewed, including cases specific to uses of music performances and musician images in games, actor images in advertising and merchandise, and professional and amateur athletes in games, etc., while also addressing special issues for user-generated content, the Internet, and social media.

Moderator: Orion Armon, Cooley LLP, Broomfield, COSpeakers: Hon. Mary L. Cooper, US District Court for the District of New Jersey, Trenton, NJ Laurie Gallun Fitzgerald, McKool Smith, Austin, TXSean S. Pak, Quinn Emanuel, San Francisco, CA

Moderator: Stephen Gillen, Wood, Herron & Evans LLP, Cincinnati, OHSpeakers: Allan Adler, Association of American Publishers, Washington, DCDale Cendali, Kirkland & Ellis, New York, NYFred Haber, Copyright Clearance Center, Danvers, MA

Moderator: Cydney A. Tune, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, San Francisco, CASpeakers: Ronald S. Katz, Manatt, Palo Alto, CAKelli Sager, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Los Angeles, CA

Cop

yrig

ht

Pat

ent

Ent

erta

inm

ent

& S

port

s

Friday April 5

regi

ster

: ww

w.a

mba

r.org

/ipl

sprin

g201

3

16

10:15a – 11:45a C O N C U R R E N T P R O G R A M S

I. Patent Examiner Interviewing: Strategies and Skills

II. When a Personal Touch Matters: Prosecuting Trademark Applications

III. The International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution: “Effective Practices Protocol” for Patent Mediation

Encouraging interviews is a priority for the US Patent and Trademark Office to quickly resolve prosecution and address backlog. In this program, both examiners and patent attorneys will conduct mock interviews, while sharing valuable insight and advice on conducting these proceedings. In addition, the panel will explore applicant benefits and provide an analysis of interview outcomes. Discussion during the interviews will review pilot and mechanics of the First Action Interview (FAI). Practical advice to leverage oral advocacy and quickly achieve allowance, while reducing prosecution history and expense will be acquired by attending this program.

Discussing a difficult trademark prosecution issue with the Examining Attorney can sometimes be more effective than a written response to an Office Action. Managing/Senior Attorneys from the US Patent and Trademark Office and experienced trademark practitioners will discuss and demonstrate the effective use of telephone interviews in the prosecution of trademark applications.

The International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution (CPR) formed a task force to explore ways to improve the use of mediation in patent cases. The task force received comments from stakeholders that included in-house and outside counsel, mediators, former judges and NPE representatives. The task force has synthesized this information to develop an “Effective Practices Protocol”. In this program, attendees will learn to identify and overcome barriers to mediation in patent disputes, resulting in more successful mediations, more satisfied clients, and more savings of time and money for clients.

Moderator: MaCharri Vorndran-Jones, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, INSpeakers: Thomas D. Franklin, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP, Denver, CO Kate Gaudry, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP, Denver, COArrienne Lezak, Former Patent Examiner, Menlo Park, CA

Moderator: Patricia S. Smart, Smart & Bostjancich, Chicago, ILSpeakers: Michael Baird, US Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA (invited)

Kathleen Cooney-Porter, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier, Neustadt, LLP, Alexandria, VAMyriah Habeeb, US Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA (invited)

Mariam Mahmoudi, US Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA (invited)

Francine D. Ward, Law Office of Francine Denise Ward, Mill Valley, CA

Moderator: Harrie Samaras, ADR & Law Office of Harrie Samaras, West Chester, PASpeakers: Kathy Bryan, International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution, New York, NYKevin Casey, Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young, LLP, Malvern, PAJohn M. Delehanty, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky & Popeo, P.C., New York, NYManny W. Schecter, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY

Trad

emar

k

AD

R

Pat

ent

Friday April 5 continued.

regi

ster

: ww

w.a

mba

r.org

/ipl

sprin

g201

3

1:45p – 3:15p C O N C U R R E N T P R O G R A M S

I. The Expanding Madrid System: A Practical and Comparative Evaluation

II. China in the 21st Century: New Laws Proposed on Copyright, Patent and Competition

III. Fraud on the US Patent and Trademark Office: Has the Plague of Inequitable Conduct Been Eradicated?

In recent years, jurisdictions within the Madrid System continue to increase. Just days after Colombia, the Mexican Senate also approved the treaty. Brazil and Argentina are working towards joining and the member countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) are required to accede by 2015. In this program, IP practitioners with first-hand experience of the Madrid System will discuss the effects it has on practice, prosecution issues and costs, and combining the perspectives of counsel in countries where the Madrid System has already been adopted with those of counsel in the new countries.

China has recently accelerated efforts to revise copyright, patent, competition laws, and judicial guidelines interpreting digital use to comply with international treaties and global trade. In this program, panelists will share their first-hand practical experience in protecting rights in China, and positioning multinational, corporate and individual clients for internet and traditional trade and branding, culture, media, entertainment and more. Learn how these new proposals may impact your practice, how China fits into the international IP puzzle, and how to navigate your clients’ interests in China during the transitory period.

The habit of charging inequitable conduct in almost every major patent case has been characterized by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit as an “absolute plague”. Has it been eradicated? In this program, discussion will focus on the implications of Exergen, Therasense and related cases, the new procedures for supplemental examination implemented in response to the passage of the America Invents Act, and the pending rule changes for supplemental examination and the revisions to the rule of candor when dealing with the US Patent and Trademark Office. Close attention will be paid to the ethical standards that now apply during prosecution and supplemental examination before the US Patent and Trademark Office. Panelists will provide various perspectives on the current state of the law and provide guidance to litigators and prosecutors on how to handle these issues in both litigation and prosecution.

Moderator: Dennis S. Prahl, Ladas & Parry LLP, New York, NYSpeakers: Victor Adames, Becerril, Coca & Becerril, S.C., Mexico (invited)

Mauricio Patino Bonnet, Prieto Carrizosa, Bogotá DC, Colombia (invited)

Maria Luisa Arce-Torrecilla, SBKG & Associes, Paris, France (invited)

Danny Chen, Unitalen Attorneys at Law, Beijing, China

Moderator: Alexandra Darraby, The Art Law Firm, Los Angeles, CASpeakers: Mark Cohen, US Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA (invited)

Elizabeth Chien-Hale, Institute Intellectual Property Asia, Beijing, ChinaFred Koenig, Volpe and Koenig, Philadelphia PAKate Spelman, Cobalt Law, Berkeley, CA

Moderator: Nicole Galli, Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff, LLP, Philadelphia, PASpeakers: Lisa Dolak, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY Janet Hendrickson, Senniger Powers LLP, St. Louis, MOKonrad Sherinian, The Law Offices of Konrad Sherinian, LLC, Naperville, IL

17

Trad

emar

k

FR

IDA

Y

Inte

rnat

iona

l

Eti

hics

Featured Luncheon Speaker:

Richard L. Rainey Executive Counsel, IP LitigationGeneral Electric Company12:00p – 1:30p Keynote Luncheon (Ticket Required)

18

3:30p – 5:00p C O N C U R R E N T P R O G R A M S

I. Aggrandizing “Petty Innovation”: The Growing Use of Utility Models

II. The Future of Copyright and Fair Use

III. From the Inside Looking Out: An In-House Counsel Perspective on US International Trade Commission Investigations

Utility models grant rights similar to a patent. However, utility models have a shorter term of exclusivity and lowered requirements for grant, often not even requiring substantive examination. Yet, utility model owners can enforce these rights against alleged infringers. This program will provide an overview of utility models, where available, subject matter which may be covered, requirements for grant, and the rights conferred. Discussion will also focus on how utility models are being used and misused in enforcement, and reviewing the case of Chint v. Schneider in China, in which the court awarded 330 million RMB damages (over 5 million USD) for utility model infringement.

“Fair Use” can be a powerful tool in maintaining the balance between private rights and the public interest. The application of “fair use” principles continues to be fraught with confusion and uncertainty. In this program, a panel of academic, administrative, legislative, and judicial experts, will discuss current controversies in fair use doctrine and the various efforts (legislative and otherwise) to solve fair use problems going forward. Attendees will gain a greater understanding of basic “fair use” principles through the panel’s discussion focusing on a critique of “best practices in fair use”, consideration of proposed and potential legislative and administrative changes, and an analysis of the application of “fair use” principles to the problem of orphan works.

The number of Section 337 investigations conducted by the US International Trade Commission continues to grow. Today, companies are dedicating more resources and in-house counsel personnel to managing these investigations. In this program, a panel of both in-house counsel, ranging from junior associate to partner level, and outside counsel will share their insight on the growing number of Section 337 Investigations. Panelists will discuss and explore current trends, practices, issues and preferences, providing various perspectives and advice on managing investigations.

Moderator: Paula K. Davis, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, INSpeakers: Ing Frank M. Peterreins, Fish & Richardson P.C., Munich, GermanyUma Suthersanen, Queen Mary University of London School of Law, London, United KingdomStephen Yang, Peksung Intellectual Property Ltd., Beijing, China

Moderator: Jennifer Rothman, Loyola Law School, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA

Moderator: Monisha Deka, Kenyon & Kenyon LLP, Washington DCSpeakers: Karin J. Norton, Samsung Electronics, Washington, DCKimberly R. Parke, Dickstein Shapiro LLP, Washington, DCVaishali Udupa, Hewlett-Packard, Herndon, VA

Cop

yrig

ht

Eth

ics

Pat

ent

Friday April 5 continued.

SPECIAL TUITION ASSISTANCEA limited number of registration fee reductions are available for government employees, academics, law students, and public interest lawyers employed with nonprofit organizations. No full tuition waivers are available. The fee-reductions will be determined on a one-time only, case-by-case, first-come first-serve basis. To apply, send a letter outlining the basis for your request of a fee reduction to Mike Winkler, Section Director, ABA Section of Intellectual Property Law, 321 N. Clark St., Chicago, IL 60654. Deadline for receipt: March 15, 2013. No cases will be considered after the deadline, and all standard registration fee rates will apply after March 15.

19

Sponsors

Diamond Level Sponsor

Bronze Level Sponsor

Women in IP Law Dinner

Thank You SP

ON

SO

RS

Sponsorship Opportunities:Conference sponsorship opportunities are available. Engage and interact with conference attendees through networking, exposure and marketing options. For more information, visit www.ambar.org/iplspring2013 or send an e-mail to [email protected].

Sponsors for the 28th Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference

currently include the following:

REGISTRATIONINFORMATIONREGISTRATION

The all-inclusive 28th Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference registration fee includes: all CLE programs, beverage breaks, noted receptions, and one set of program materials on a flash drive.

Register by March 15, 2013 and pay the discounted registration fee of $645. To be included in the Attendee Roster, your registration must be received by March 20, 2013.

Cancellation PolicyRegistrants who are unable to attend the conference will receive a refund less a $100 administrative fee if a written cancellation is received by March 15, 2013. Cancellation requests should be faxed to 312.988.6800. (The administrative fee for cancellation is $50 for Corporate Counsel, Law Student, and Government and Public Sector fee categories.) No refunds will be granted after March 15, 2013. Vouchers for future programs will not be provided. Proxy substitutions are acceptable. The ABA reserves the right to cancel any program and assumes no responsibility for personal expenses.

Early RegistrationRegister online at www.ambar.org/iplspring2013 or complete the form in the brochure and mail to: 28th Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference, Section of Intellectual Property Law, American Bar Association, 321 N. Clark St., Chicago, IL 60654. Attendees are strongly encouraged to use the online registration service.

The deadline for receipt of early registration, at the early registration rate, is March 15, 2013. Registration will only be accepted when accompanied by a credit card number (Visa, MasterCard or American Express only). Checks, money orders, or government purchase orders or training forms may also be used when submitting a printed copy of the registration form via mail. No registration can be held without payment.

Onsite RegistrationRegistration and check-in will be available onsite, the schedule is as follows:Tuesday, April 2 11:00 am – 5:00 pm

Wednesday, April 3 7:30 am – 5:30 pm

Thursday, April 4 7:00 am – 5:00 pm

Friday, April 5 7:30 am – 5:00 pm Onsite registrations will be accepted only when accompanied by a credit card (Visa, MasterCard or American Express only), check, money order, or government purchase order or training form. Late registration fees will be in effect for onsite registrations.

Registration ConfirmationConfirmation of registration will be sent via e-mail in advance of the program for all registrations received prior to March 20. If using the printed registration form, indicate on the registration form if you would prefer to receive confirmation via fax or US mail.

Course Materials Available on Flash DriveCourse materials are produced on a flash drive and made available for pickup at the conference. A limited number of printed course material sets will be available for an additional fee to those who request this in advance on the registration form. Materials will also be posted on the Section website, available for viewing by conference registrants in advance of the conference.

www.ambar.org/iplspring2013

CLE CREDIT ABA programs ordinarily receive CLE credit in AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CO, DE, FL, GA, GU, HI, IA, ID, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, ME, MN, MS, MO, MT, NH, NM, NV, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, UT, VT, VA, VI, WA, WI, WV, and WY. These states sometimes do not approve a program for credit before the program occurs. Attendees requesting credit for the program must sign the attendance roster onsite at the program. New York attorneys must sign in and sign out each time they enter or leave the program room, and complete the special New York certificate of attendance at the end of each session and have it signed by ABA authorized personnel. For more information about CLE accreditation, visit ambar.org/iplspring2013 or contact Brian O’Connor, [email protected] or 312.988.6268.

20

21

REGISTRATION

LOCATION/LODGING The 28th Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference will be held at the Crystal Gateway Marriott Hotel, 1700 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, Virginia. The ABA group rate is $199.00 single/double occupancy. All rooms are subject to a 12.5% Virginia State Sales Tax. Make your reservation online at https://resweb.passkey.com/go/ABAIPL2013 or call the Crystal Gateway Marriott Hotel directly at 703.920.3230 or 888.236.2427. Be sure to mention the ABA 2013 Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference to receive the special group rate.

Note: The cutoff date for the room block is Tuesday, March 12, 2013. But do not wait until the March 12th cutoff date, as the room block and the hotel fill up quickly. After this date, reservations can be made on a space available basis only. The ABA will not be able to secure a room for you.

Please note the Crystal Gateway Marriott Hotel, as are all Marriott properties, is a completely non-smoking facility. For our guests who choose to smoke, there are a number of nearby alternative hotels. You may find these through the ABA Online Travel site (see below).

TransportationYou are encouraged to make your airline reservations on the ABA Online Travel site where you automatically receive ABA airfare discounts from a variety of carriers.

Access the ABA provider, Orbitz for Business, at www.americanbar.org/membership/benefits_of_membership/travel_services.html or the Orbitz toll free number 877.222.4185.

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT If special arrangements are necessary for individuals with disabilities to attend this conference, please contact Brian O’Connor, at the ABA Section of Intellectual Property Law, 321 N. Clark St., Chicago, IL 60654, or 312.988.6268 or [email protected] by March 1, 2013.

QUESTIONS?Please call Brian O’Connor, ABA-IPL Meetings Assistant, at 312.988.6268 or [email protected]

Don

’t m

iss!

CLE accredited educational sessions

Committee meetings

Mark T. Banner Award Luncheon

Section Receptions

Section Celebration Evening Event

Professional Development Program

and numerous ABA tours, events, activities

2013 ABA Annual Meeting

with special ABA-IPL Section programs and

events

INF

OR

MA

TIO

N

For complete information: www.americanbar.org/iplaw

Section Activity Hub: Hotel Intercontinental

San FranciscoAugust 8-11, 2013San Francisco, CA

Just some of the many majestic sites —and sights—of Washington, DC!

p.4 Lincoln Memorial

p.6 Thomas Jefferson statue

p.9 Library of Congress ceiling, Main Hall

p.10 Georgetown Bridge reflection

p.11 USAF Memorial

p.11 Library of Congress staircase

p.12 Washington Monument

p.13 Thomas Jefferson Memorial

p.14 US Capitol rotunda ceiling

p.15 US Capitol

p.16 The Auditorium, near the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier

p.17 Native American Museum curved roof

p.18 World War II Memorial

28th Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference

Program ChairsNicole Galli Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan, & Aronoff, LLP Philadelphia, PA

Jonathan Hudis Oblon, Spivak, McCelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP Alexandria, VA

Kim R. Jessum Heraeus, Inc. Langhorne, PA

Jeffery A. Lindeman J.A. Lindeman & Co. PLLC McLean, VA

Paul R. Morico Baker Botts, LLP Houston, TX

2012-2013 ABA-IPL CLE Board MembersScott M. Alter Faegre & Benson, LLP Denver, CO

Amy Benjamin Benjamin Law, PC New York, NY

Marisia Campbell QNX Software Systems Company Ottawa, ON

Brian Carroll Foley Hoag LLP Boston, MA

David T. Cox David T. Cox, Esq. St. Louis, MO

Alex Feerst Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP Menlo Park, CA

Robert K. Fergan Brinks, Hofer, Gilson & Lione Ann Arbor, MI

Janet Fries Drinker, Biddle & Reath, LLP Washington, DC

Nicole D. Galli Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff, LLP Philadelphia, PA

Jonathan Hudis (VC) Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP Alexandria, VA

Kim Jessum (C) Heraeus Incorporated Langhorne, PA

Mary Lou Kevlin Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, PC New York, NY

Nancy M. Lambert Donaldson Company Minneapolis, MN

Jeffrey A. Lindeman J.A. Lindeman & Co. PLLC McLean, VA

Monica McCabe Vandenberg & Feliu LLP New York, NY

Diane Dunn McKay Porzio, Bromberg & Newman, PC Princeton, NJ

Paul R. Morico Baker Botts, LLP Houston, TX

Jonathan Muenkel Life Technologies Corp. Carlsbad, CA

Aimee Nolan WW Grainger, Inc. Lake Forest, IL

Kimberlee Parke Dickstein Shapiro, LLP Washington, DC

David Postolski Day Pitney, LLP Parsippany, NJ

Erik Pelton Erik M. Pelton & Associates, PLLC Arlington, VA

Elizabeth Rodriguez University of Massachusetts Shrewsbury, MA

Mark Wittow K&L Gates, LLP Seattle, WA

Nancy Wolff Cowas, DeBaets, Abrahams & Sheppard, LLP New York, NY

AB

A-IP

L C

LE

BO

AR

D

22

23

Registrant Information

Name

Organization

Address

City State Zip

Daytime phone number Fax number

E-Mail

_____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____

ABA ID Number [8 digits]

States registered to practice in: State Bar ID number:

__________________________ _________________

__________________________ _________________

Payment $ ______________________

(Total of all fees)

Credit Card

*Visa *MasterCard *American Express

Card number

Expiration date

Signature

Print name as it appears on card

*Check enclosed Payable to “American Bar Association”

*Purchase Order # ______________________________

(Government employees only)

ConfirmationThank you for your registration. A confirmation will be sent to you via e-mail. If you prefer your confirmation by fax or US Mail, please indicate below:

*Fax *Mail

Return registration to:28th Annual Intellectual Property Law ConferenceSection of Intellectual Property LawAmerican Bar Association321 North Clark StreetChicago, IL 60654Fax: 312.988.6800

Questions?

Please e-mail [email protected] or 312.988.6268.

Advance Registration Deadline: March 15, 2013To register directly online, please visit: www.ambar.org/iplspring2013

*Yes, please register me for the 28th Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference.

*No, I cannot attend this conference. Please send me the course materials on flash drive available after the conference at the price of $75, which includes postage and handling. Payment must accompany this form (please allow 4-6 weeks from date of conference for receipt of course materials).

Registration Fees (check one)

Register before March 15 to receive the special discount early registration rate.

Before 3/15 After 3/15ABA-IPL Section Member *$645 *$695

ABA Section of Science & Technology Law Member *$645 *$695

ABA Forum of Entertainment & Sports Law Member *$645 *$695

The Copyright Society of the USA (CSUSA) *$645 *$695

ABA, but not ABA-IPL or co-sponsoring Section Member *$720 *$770(registration includes a one-year ABA-IPL Section membership)

General Attendee (non ABA Member) *$745 *$845

Government, Public Interest, Academic *$295 *$345

Corporate Counsel *$295 *$345

Law Student *$245 *$295

BreakfastThursday, April 4 – IP Law Breakfast * $40

LuncheonsWednesday, April 3 – International Networking Lunch * FreeThursday, April 4 – with keynote speaker Steven W. Miller, The Procter & Gamble, Co. * $60Friday, April 5 – with keynote speaker Richard L. Rainey, General Electric Company * $60

Evening EventsWednesday, April 3 – LGBT Diversity Reception *FreeWednesday, April 3 – Young Lawyers Networking Reception *FreeWednesday, April 3 – Women In IP Law Dinner *$75Thursday, April 4 – Opportunities for Publishing with the ABA-IPL Section: Wine Reception *Free Thursday, April 4 – Special Section Reception (Transportation provided) *$25

Printed Course Materials Order Please reserve for me a printed set of course materials *$75(in addition to the course materials flash drive which is included in the registration fee). Orders for printed materials must be received before March 15. Course materials will be available onsite upon check-in at the registration desk.

Special ArrangementsIf any special arrangements are required for a disabled individual to attend this program, or any special dietary menus are required for the luncheons, please note them below:

CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FORM

To register directly online, please visit: www.ambar.org/iplspring2013

Just some of the many majestic sites —and sights—of Washington, DC!

p.4 Lincoln Memorial

p.6 Thomas Jefferson statue

p.9 Library of Congress ceiling, Main Hall

p.10 Georgetown Bridge reflection

p.11 USAF Memorial

p.11 Library of Congress staircase

p.12 Washington Monument

p.13 Thomas Jefferson Memorial

p.14 US Capitol rotunda ceiling

p.15 US Capitol

p.16 The Auditorium, near the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier

p.17 Native American Museum curved roof

p.18 World War II Memorial

RE

GIS

TR

AT

ION

FO

RM

28th Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference. April 3-5, 2013. Arlington, Virginia.

NONPROFITORGANIZATIONU.S. POSTAGE PAIDAMERICAN BARASSOCIATION321 North Clark Street

Chicago, IL 60654

Register online at www.ambar.org/iplspring2013

Address correction requested

Advanceregistration deadline: 3/15/13