are we having fun yet? understanding fun

37
The Missing Element in Economic Anthropology

Upload: richard-wilk

Post on 16-Apr-2017

197 views

Category:

Lifestyle


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

The Missing Element in Economic Anthropology

Page 2: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

What we do not study can be more informative than comfortable and conventional topics

Divide safe zones from places that are unclean

(A deafening silence)

These zones of willful blindness are always worth investigating (open fields are liberating)

Page 3: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

Rachel Black, Europe’s largest retail food market

Page 4: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

many people go to the market because they find it entertaining – they enjoy being there and the interactions they have with vendors and other shoppers. She describes both formal and informal groups which meet in the market to talk about and taste food.

Page 5: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

shoppers are entertained by each other, and they enjoy hunting for bargains and unusual items; fun and games like competitive shopping (reality TV)

Page 6: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

In the classic Durkheimian move the market becomes a medium of social integration, and fun a form of ‘effervescence” that binds people together.

Page 7: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

Functionalism – what does fun do? Utilitarianism - How does it tie people

together or satisfy other needs? Attempts to locate fun in geography

(fun places), time (holidays, breaks), particular forms of play and recreation (gambling, sports, nature).

“The Hedonic” in CR (eg. Holbrook and Hirschman 1982) and Arnould’s work on River Rafting.

Page 8: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

The market is primarily a form of entertainment;That this is why markets persist despite the competition of supermarkets? requires that we take

entertainment, fun seriously as a subject, and end in itself.

Page 9: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

A transient emotion rather than a stable stateScholarly divisions: which discipline does it belong to?Scholarly distance: the need to be serious scholarsClass associations: more and less refined, or rational

Page 10: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

Anthropology’s deep commitment to finding the rationality of the other’s behavior. The 2 forms of anthropological magic are showing how the exotic is really mundane and vice versa.

Page 11: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

Latour: The work of purification and the proliferation of hybrids

Fun as both concept and practice is unstable, transgressive, impure and relatively untheorized – always a product of something else

Page 12: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

Theories in which fun serves as a dividing line between

traditional and modern the West and the rest social order and chaos

Page 13: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

High fun and low fun

Laetitia Joy or Pleasure titillatio titillation

(embodied fun) hilaritas cheerfulness

(mindful fun)Gaudium Gladness

Page 14: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

“…if the rite serves only to distract, it is no longer a rite.”The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, 1965:427

And of course, Marx was deeply suspicious of pleasure. Adorno even more so. Sport as oppression.

Page 15: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

“Later, laughter begins a process of degradation: it is systematized, politicized and rationalized, as was truth, by the emergent European absolute monarchies; the parallel, inverted (i.e. grotesque) world created by laughter was subordinated to a new order. Parody and satire no longer degraded to regenerate, but merely mocked; laughter was reduced to its negative aspect, and the positive discarded.”

Page 16: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

Part of a critique of modernity – “we have forgotten how to really have fun”

Play once suffused all social life; now it has been exiled and encapsulated in commercialized leisure.(or maybe the opposite)

Page 17: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

Fun may not be a cultural universal; many cultures have no equivalent termsYet, as Peter Stromberg argues, entertainment is the cultural “hub” of consumer society (even education)

And the largest industry in the world

Page 18: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun
Page 19: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

• Happiness is supposedly stable• Relatively easily measured• Useful as a means of attacking the hegemony of ‘utility’• Allows relatively simple forms of correlation analysis• A means to attack hegemony of wealth and growth as

an ultimate value

Most importantly, it is a bourgeois value that has always been used as a tool to denigrate the values of both the aristocracy and the working class

Has had a remarkably successful academic and political career

Page 20: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

 AVERAGE HAPPINESS IN 95 NATIONS 1995-

2005  

Top> 7,7

Middle range± 6,0

Bottom<4

Denmark 8,2 Philippines 6,4 Armenia 3,7

Switzerland 8,1 India 6,2 Ukraine 3,6

Austria 8,0 Iran 6,0 Moldova 3,5

Iceland 7,8 Poland 5,9 Zimbabwe 3,3

Finland 7,7 South Korea 5,8 Tanzania 3,2

Page 21: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

   Other Journals:  *  Health and Quality of Life Outcomes    * Quality of Life Research                     * Social Indicator Network                          * Social Indicators Research                                 * Applied Research in Quality of Life

Page 22: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun
Page 23: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun
Page 24: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

http://www.happyplanetindex.org/

But Happiness studies have had a real impact on policy and have been an entry point for considering non-economic values in public policy and economics itself

Page 25: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun
Page 26: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

Goffman:Play requires both separation, and close connection with other players

A form of partial alienation, between real danger and the trivial challenge

Page 27: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

Proposition:Fun is evoked by gaining or losing control of

objects, situations, and people. It is transitional, unstable, a process rather than a state.

The basic rhythm of consumer culture is control and release, experienced as work and fun

(Nichter and Nichter 1991, Hype and Weight)

Page 28: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

Distance from the mundane and everydayWe often fail in trying to have funLack of fun can make us anxious or uncomfortableRepetition is problematic, can you have the same fun twice?Novelty is stimulating, fun is expansiveHas a tendency to crowd out other experiences and emotions

Page 29: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

We do not have a theory of what makes objects ‘fun’ though toys appear in the archaeological record c.5000 BC

Freud and others tend to pathologize object attachment.

My theory suggests that objects which have agency will be the most ‘fun.’

Page 30: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun
Page 31: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

Not nutrition,Nutri-tainment

A branch of the entertainment industry

Page 32: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

WWW.LILEKS.COMGallery of Regrettable Food

Page 33: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun
Page 34: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

Gang Labor

male homosocial work groupsphysical and social isolation, mobilitystrenuous and dangerous laborlargely self-supervisedTransforming danger and exploitation into fun through competition, and binge consumptionThe things which make a horrible life bearable are the things that keep people stuck in that life

Page 36: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

New relationships between work and play, the relationship between fun and violence

Page 37: Are we Having Fun Yet? Understanding Fun

http://journalofsadness.monkeychow.com

A SCIENCE OF BOREDOM?

(see Lofgren and Ehn, 2011 The Secret World of Doing Nothing.)