are leaders born, made or just poached?

1
L e a d e r 1 6 independent JUNE 30 2013 THE SUNDAY W HEN Agang SA leader Mamphela Ramphele launched the party, she was accused of failing to announce prominent individuals who had joined the party as it prepares to contest next year’s gener- al elections. All she said was many experienced parliamentarians and “battle-hardened activists” would join Agang’s national and provincial lead- ers in the coming months. For me this evoked the age-old chicken-and-egg question: Are leaders born or are they made? Why would Agang depend on ready-made leaders from other parties? Why can’t Agang SA and every political party, company or organisa- tion, breed, groom or produce its own leaders? After all, countries, parties and even companies groom their own leaders. Where was US President Barack Obama 15 years ago? Where was British Prime Minister David Cameron six years ago? Where was Democratic Alliance leader Lindiwe Mazibuko a few years ago? Where was Adrian Gore (Group chief executive of Discovery Group) 20 years ago, or Sim Shabalala (Standard Bank joint chief executive) five years ago? When did you first hear about these leaders? The above political and busi- ness leaders and hundreds of others are evidence that some individuals are born with natural abilities that propel them to leadership. On the other hand it is possible to develop leadership skills in an individual. Too often we see what appear to be natural leadership skills only as people emerge from the shadows of outgoing leaders – from Bill Clinton to Obama, from Jaco Maree to Sim Shabalala – and fail to see the work, time, and effort that the individuals, parties and com- panies have devoted to getting them to a position of leadership. There are many witty quotations on what leadership means to the people and society at large. Harold R McAlin- don said: “A leader may not follow where the path may lead. He goes instead where there is no path and leaves a trail.” Thomas Carlyle described leader- ship in simple words: “The history of the world is but the biography of great men.” Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe said: “What chance gathers is easily scat- tered. A great person attracts great peo- ple and knows how to hold them togeth- er.” So to the question of are leaders born or made, my answer is simple: leaders are born and leaders are made. Regardless of the leader being born or developed, there are common denominators such as intelligence, communication skills, charisma, fol- lowers, creativity, and humility that automatically surface as they are given an opportunity to assume leadership roles. On the other hand, I would argue that those qualities are the result of interactions, experiences and transac- tions involving a person from birth until the time that you meet them. For me, the four – intelligence, com- munications skills, charisma and fol- lowers – make a leader. Here the late British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher was spot on when she said: “Watch your thoughts for they become words. Watch your words for they become actions. Watch your actions for they become habits. Watch your habits for they become your char- acter. And watch your character for it becomes your destiny. What we think, we become. “My father always said that… and I think I am fine.” The Iron Lady was right. We all admire a leader who inspires us, stands by us in times of joy and pain and shares with us joys and triumphs. Whether a leader is born or made, what actually matters is the ability to lead from the front, confidently, winning the confidence of those who look up to you. Good leaders create a vision, artic- ulate the vision, passionately own the vision and relentlessly drive it to com- pletion. That’s what great leaders are made of. Who remembers this vision from former president Nelson Mandela? “I have fought against white domination, and I have fought against black domi- nation. I have cherished the ideal of a democratic and free society in which all persons will live together in harmo- ny with equal opportunities. It is an ideal which I hope to live for, and to see realised. But my Lord, if needs be, it is an ideal for which I am prepared to die.” Indeed, a leader with vision, such as Mandela, has a clear, vivid picture of where to go. But it’s not enough to have a vision; leaders must also share it and act upon it. It is at this point when I agree with those who say leaders are made. You can’t teach charisma and character. Van Wyk is chief executive of AstroTech Training. W HEN President Barack Obama returns home after his visit to South Africa and two other African states it is to be hoped that he will do so with a sense of accomplishment other than a tick next the box of “things to do – visit Africa”. The ascension of the first African- American to the Oval Office in 2009 raised hopes among many that the arrival of Obama would lead to an increased focus on the continent. Americans say: “It is not over until the Fat Lady sings” but with only about three years left in office, Obama has left it late to dispel the perception that Africa has been low on his administration’s list of priorities. To be fair, these priorities have been many and pressing, not least of which was pulling the US from the brink of an economic depression and then clawing out of a prolonged recession. Then, after a scandal-free first term, Obama has been devoting time to tackling the crises that, in their various forms, afflict all US administrations. The latest of these – electronic spying – erupted just as Obama set off for his belated African safari. And the nations on the list for his short tour tell much of the desire for a quick, happy trip. Missing from the itinerary is the land of his birth, Kenya, where both the president and his deputy are wanted by the International Criminal Court. Also missing is the powerhouse of Nigeria, subject to recent US criticism over human rights abuses. On the menu are peaceful Senegal and Tanzania and South Africa. In his only other visit to Africa Obama spent less than a day in Ghana, so in comparison it could be said the American president is indeed devoting more time to what the Chinese, for one, have clearly marked as a place of economic opportunities. Indeed trade has been placed high on the stated agenda of Obama’s trip, and it is there that he can leave a mark, even if it is to, in effect, further the policies of his predecessors Bill Clinton and George W Bush. Both pushed for increased trade, with Clinton introducing the African Growth and Opportunity Act, with its generous provisions for preferential trade agreements between qualifying African countries and the United States. Under its provision trade has soared, to the benefit of many Africans in many nations, including South Africa. It is up to the US Congress to renew it, but if Obama is to prove his commitment to this continent, then his championing its cause should help sway those who have thus far been disappointed in America’s first black president. Are leaders born, made or just poached? M o s h o e s h o e M o n a r e M AKAZIWE Mandela’s emotional outburst and her lashing of the media were regrettable, but understandable. She is right to accuse the media of gross insensitivity, considering the journalists hovering like birds of prey at the Mediclinic Heart Hospital, where Nelson Mandela has been for the past three weeks. Like the rest of her family, she is in pain. Mandela is not just a national icon to her, but also a father, who was taken away from her for most of her life. She was forced to share him with the rest of the world when Madiba was finally freed in 1990. Her bitterness and uncontrollable anger are justified. She and her family have had to care for the frail Mandela while the rest of us go on with our lives – until he is in hospital. We only remember him on Mandela Day. “It is very crass. “The fact that my dad is a global icon, one of the 25 most influential people of the 21st century doesn’t mean people cannot respect the privacy and dignity of my dad. “There’s a sort of a racist element with the foreign media where they just cross boundaries. “It’s like vultures, waiting when a lion has devoured a buffalo, waiting there for the last carcass. That’s the image we have as a family. “We don’t mind the interest, I just think it has gone overboard. “I don’t know why these people come here and violate everything in the book,” she told SABC TV on Thursday. Inasmuch as I agree with her that it was unacceptable for some of us to create the impression that anyone could lie about the state of Mandela, she must never underestimate the nation and the world’s anxiety about the icon. I agree with her that some of the rumours and reporting were callously insensitive. An Australian paper reported on Thursday that Mandela had died. However, I think Makaziwe misunderstood the role of the responsible media. The responsible media has told the world that Madiba is critical but stable, and allayed fears and dispelled callous rumours. The responsible media will convey the family and people’s prayers, their hope and pain. Makaziwe must remember it was the same responsible media that reminded the world that Nelson Mandela was still silenced and languishing on Robben Island. It was the media, conveying the hopes and feeling of the people, that ensured that he and his comrades were not forgotten. It was the same international media that enquired about his welfare, plight, and health to make sure that Pretoria did not harm him. His health is not just another sensational story, but a painful experience to all of us. It is out of concern, and not just a professional duty, that we keep watch at Mediclinic with anxiety and sorrow. Makaziwe, no one will dispute that Madiba is your father and that you feel more pain than the rest of us, but the world loves him too. At least Winnie Madikizela- Mandela captured the essence of this moment when she appealed to the media on Friday to understand the family’s “bitterness” given the circumstances, but also cautioned against irresponsible coverage. T HE upcoming feature on Nelson Mandela, given the recent panic surrounding his health, needs an update. Long Walk to Free- dom is the definitive fea- ture film that will star Idris Elba as Mandela and is directed by Justin Chadwick, an English director. I have nothing against either of them but I believe given the subject matter and our fledgling film industry, this film should have starred a South African and been directed by a South African. Mandela is South African, we are not merely subjects but alive and engaged in the world. We have many talented men and women. The payback for Mandela’s progressiveness, as usual, seems to come in a manner in which ordinary South Africans pay the price, and are taken advantage of. It is to take advantage of the Strug- gle against apartheid to assume that a Mandela can be played by everyone except a South African, and that there are no home-grown directors who can re-tell this multi-layered story. My expe- riences with this film’s production team were that they were bent on using the director they wanted and that oth- er directors could not bid, or provide, treatments. At least this is what hap- pened when I made the suggestion to write an adaptation on Mandela’s book. What you now have is a film about Madiba, written by a Briton, directed by a Briton, filmed by a Briton and act- ed by a Briton. As early as 2011 I had written an open letter to Mandela and his Founda- tion, addressing this oversight and what will for generations be a problem associated with this film. I was fortu- nate to meet Anant Singh in New York during his promotion of Fourth Grader last year. Thereafter I tried to forge a relationship with the “pre-eminent South African film-maker”, but to no avail. I raised the subject of Mandela being played by a non-South African and directed by a non-South African as being offensive and marginally insensi- tive directly to Sanjeev, Singh’s partner who is aware of my criticism of this endeavour. I also raised the issue of perhaps getting John Kani to direct. What comes out of this situation is that South African film-makers are not respected by other South African film- makers; South Africans can only be subjects not creators of their own sto- ries, and that South Africans are seen as arrogant to even suggest ownership of their cultural heritage. See the fias- co that surrounded the making of the story on Winnie Mandela – where in the world do you make a movie about a famous person without their permis- sion, even if a book was written about that person? A South African director would have portrayed Madiba’s life not in romantic terms but in terms of deep character understanding, context and in unapologetic terms. I can imagine my Long Walk to Free- dom opening with the show of splen- dour in a white suburb contrasted thereafter with Mandela’s rural life and the harsh realities of a black South African in 1930s South Africa – to put us in the furnace of apartheid right away – for Mandela would not have had such a great life if it were not for the context of apartheid. This is not a court case Mandela vs South Africa, but a rich multi-layered story in which Madiba has given and received from many. South Africa has a promising film industry but we will never get ahead when the most prominent among us do not reach back and find talent. Some- thing has to be noted on the point that was given concerning Madiba’s height – South Africans are not that tall. The chap playing Nelson Mandela looks nothing like him. Is this a problem? I will answer that question with a ques- tion – when period pieces are made, don’t they have to look like the period? In this case the main ingredient/char- acter are unlike the real thing. This is a slippery slope, and here we recall Paul Newman in Hombre where he played a blue-eyed Native American, and Ben Kingsley as Mahatma Gandhi in Gandhi. We should not legitimatise that non-whites can only be subjects and not creators because they are arro- gant, inexperienced, and don’t look the part. That is not a reason but merely an excuse for the underlining manner in which movies are made and the tradi- tion of resentment against black film- makers. In a show of duplicity, even Richard Burton looked like Churchill in Walk with Destiny (The Gathering Storm in the US); James Bond is perennially played by a Briton – personally I think Humphrey Bogart would have made a good Bond. Character in films is some- thing invaluable; it is the essence and the life breath of the story. Even when the actor is finished acting, you tend to associate him with the character played. This to say that this would have been a great opportunity to introduce a talented South African to the world – a chance that has been squandered. Film-making should be an all inclu- sive process, a fun process, not an adversarial and pretentious show of economic might, leaving the subjects angry and resentful at the final prod- uct. I can imagine that it’s hard on Singh, as well in terms of raising the money, but this is a project that wealthy South African industrialists (some of them Madiba’s friends) should have funded. If not this project, then which one will they fund? If we are to accept the paternalistic argument of the film-makers that South Africans are not ready, then help us – invite us to see what ready looks like. This was our shining moment, to show the world what we could do and we were robbed of that moment. There are more films to come from South Africa, on Shaka Zulu; Christi- aan Barnard (first heart surgeon); Mapungubwe (the lost city); Albert Luthuli; King Moshoeshoe; Gary Play- er and Robert Sobukwe – even World War ll’s General Jan Smuts deserves a film – but next time let’s get it right. South Africa is a talented nation, let’s not sell ourselves short. Sibanda is a South African-born American writer, film director and author of a collection of literary poems The Songs of Soweto: Poems From A Post Apartheid South Africa. Long walk does not lead to SA actors K e n S i b a n d a L i z a v a n W y k A c c e p t i n g a n h o n o r a r y d o c t o r a t e f r o m t h e S h e i k h A n t a D i o p U n i v e r s i t y o f D a k a r , S e n e g a l , N e l s o n M a n d e l a s a y s : A f r i c a c a n n o t b e r e b o r n w h i l e i t s i n s t i t u t i o n s o f g o v e r n m e n t d o n o t r e s p e c t t h e e n t i t l e m e n t o f a l l c i t i z e n s t o a l l b a s i c h u m a n r i g h t s . J u n e 3 0 , 1 9 9 2 M a n d e l a H I S t o r y We do share your pain, dear Makaziwe D E P U T Y E D I T O R Japhet Ncube 011 633 2827 [email protected] S U N D A Y L I F E E D I T O R Arja Salafranca 011 633 2464 [email protected] B O O K S E D I T O R Mary Corrigall 011 633 2440 [email protected] C H I E F S U B - E D I T O R Kenneth Chikanga 011 633 2226 [email protected] S P O R T Mark Beer 011 633 2374 [email protected] A D D R E S S 47 Sauer Street Johannesburg 2000 Tel: 011 633 2265 Fax: 011 633 2216 [email protected] A D V E R T I S I N G Jacqueline Bayes 011 639 7136 S U B S C R I P T I O N S J O H A N N E S B U R G 0860 326 262 daily 6:30am – 6:30pm weekends 7:30am – 9:30 am D U R B A N 031 308 2022 daily 6:30am – 6:30pm weekends 7:30am – 9:30 am C A P E T O W N 0800 220 770 daily 6:30am – 6:00pm weekends 7:00am – 10:00 am Issue No 907 T h e S u n d a y I n d e p e n d e n t is printed by Caxton Printers at 16 Wright Street, Industria for the proprietors and publishers, Independent Newspapers (Pty) Ltd, and is registered at the GPO as a newspaper.The price,including tax,is: S o u t h A f r i c a R 1 6 . 5 0 ; S w a z i l a n d a n d Z i m b a b w e R 1 9 , B o t s w a n a R 1 6 . 5 0 The Sunday Independent subscribes to the South African Press Code,which prescribes that news must be truthful,accurate,fair and balanced.If we don’t live up to the code,please contact: T h e P r e s s O m b u d s m a n , 2 n d F l o o r , 7 S t . D a v i d s s P a r k , S t D a v i d s P l a c e , P a r k t o w n , 2 1 9 3 or P O B o x 4 7 2 2 1 , P a r k l a n d s 2 1 2 1 . P h o n e 0 1 1 4 8 4 3 6 1 2 / 8 ; f a x 0 1 1 4 8 4 3 6 1 9 . Queries about the standards and principles of advertising can be sent to: T h e S e c r e t a r y , A d v e r t i s i n g S t a n d a r d s A u t h o r i t y o f S o u t h A f r i c a , 4 1 5 5 5 , C r a i g h a l l , 2 0 2 4 . The circulation of the Sunday Independent is certified by the Audit Bureau of Circulations, at Su i t e 5 , 1 5 8 J a n S m u t s , 9 W a l t e r s A v e , R o s e b a n k , 2 1 9 6 or P O B o x 4 7 2 2 1 , P a r k l a n d s 2 1 2 1 . C o p y r i g h t : The reproduction or broadcast without permission of articles published in this newspaper is forbidden and reserved to Independent Newspapers (Pty) Ltd,under Section 12(7) of the Copyright Act,1978. E D I T O R Moshoeshoe Monare 011 633 2180 [email protected] Obama’s visit may yet put focus on Africa

Upload: astrotech

Post on 13-Mar-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

DESCRIPTION

http://www.astrotech.co.za/training/mngseminars/MasteringLeadership.asp The question that is posed by this article is not a new one. However, it’s undoubtedly as relevant today as it was when it was first asked. After considering various facts that substantiate all sides of this argument, chief executive of AstroTech Training, Liza van Wyk, concludes that leadership skills can either be innate or developed - but there are common characteristics that generally define leaders. AstroTech provides effective management courses for people who are looking to improving their leadership skills.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Are leaders born, made or just poached?

Leader16 independentJUNE 30 2013

THE SUNDAY

WHEN Agang SA leaderMamphela Ramphelelaunched the party, shewas accused of failingto announce prominent

individuals who had joined the party asit prepares to contest next year’s gener-al elections. All she said was manyexperienced parliamentarians and“battle-hardened activists” would joinAgang’s national and provincial lead-ers in the coming months.

For me this evoked the age-oldchicken-and-egg question: Are leadersborn or are they made? Why wouldAgang depend on ready-made leadersfrom other parties?

Why can’t Agang SA and everypolitical party, company or organisa-tion, breed, groom or produce its ownleaders? After all, countries, partiesand even companies groom their ownleaders. Where was US PresidentBarack Obama 15 years ago? Wherewas British Prime Minister DavidCameron six years ago? Where wasDemocratic Alliance leader LindiweMazibuko a few years ago?

Where was Adrian Gore (Groupchief executive of Discovery Group) 20years ago, or Sim Shabalala (StandardBank joint chief executive) five yearsago?

When did you first hear about theseleaders? The above political and busi-ness leaders and hundreds of othersare evidence that some individuals are

born with natural abilities that propelthem to leadership. On the other handit is possible to develop leadershipskills in an individual.

Too often we see what appear to benatural leadership skills only as peopleemerge from the shadows of outgoingleaders – from Bill Clinton to Obama,from Jaco Maree to Sim Shabalala –and fail to see the work, time, and effortthat the individuals, parties and com-panies have devoted to getting them toa position of leadership.

There are many witty quotations onwhat leadership means to the peopleand society at large. Harold R McAlin-don said: “A leader may not followwhere the path may lead. He goesinstead where there is no path andleaves a trail.”

Thomas Carlyle described leader-ship in simple words: “The history of

the world is but the biography of greatmen.”

Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe said:“What chance gathers is easily scat-tered. A great person attracts great peo-ple and knows how to hold them togeth-er.”

So to the question of are leadersborn or made, my answer is simple:leaders are born and leaders are made.

Regardless of the leader being bornor developed, there are commondenominators such as intelligence,communication skills, charisma, fol-lowers, creativity, and humility thatautomatically surface as they are givenan opportunity to assume leadershiproles.

On the other hand, I would arguethat those qualities are the result ofinteractions, experiences and transac-tions involving a person from birthuntil the time that you meet them.

For me, the four – intelligence, com-munications skills, charisma and fol-lowers – make a leader.

Here the late British Prime MinisterMargaret Thatcher was spot on whenshe said: “Watch your thoughts for theybecome words. Watch your words forthey become actions. Watch youractions for they become habits. Watchyour habits for they become your char-acter. And watch your character for itbecomes your destiny. What we think,we become.

“My father always said that… and I

think I am fine.” The Iron Lady was right. We all

admire a leader who inspires us, standsby us in times of joy and pain andshares with us joys and triumphs.Whether a leader is born or made, whatactually matters is the ability to leadfrom the front, confidently, winning theconfidence of those who look up to you.

Good leaders create a vision, artic-ulate the vision, passionately own thevision and relentlessly drive it to com-pletion. That’s what great leaders aremade of.

Who remembers this vision fromformer president Nelson Mandela? “Ihave fought against white domination,and I have fought against black domi-nation. I have cherished the ideal of ademocratic and free society in whichall persons will live together in harmo-ny with equal opportunities. It is anideal which I hope to live for, and to seerealised. But my Lord, if needs be, it isan ideal for which I am prepared todie.”

Indeed, a leader with vision, such asMandela, has a clear, vivid picture ofwhere to go. But it’s not enough to havea vision; leaders must also share it andact upon it.

It is at this point when I agree withthose who say leaders are made. Youcan’t teach charisma and character.

■ Van Wyk is chief executive of

AstroTech Training.

WHEN President Barack

Obama returns home after

his visit to South Africa

and two other African

states it is to be hoped that

he will do so with a sense of

accomplishment other than a tick next the box

of “things to do – visit Africa”.

The ascension of the first African-

American to the Oval Office in 2009 raised

hopes among many that the arrival of Obama

would lead to an increased focus on the

continent.

Americans say: “It is not over until the Fat

Lady sings” but with only about three years

left in office, Obama has left it late to dispel the

perception that Africa has been low on his

administration’s list of priorities.

To be fair, these priorities have been many

and pressing, not least of which was pulling

the US from the brink of an economic

depression and then clawing out of a

prolonged recession.

Then, after a scandal-free first term, Obama

has been devoting time to tackling the crises

that, in their various forms, afflict all US

administrations.

The latest of these – electronic spying –

erupted just as Obama set off for his belated

African safari.

And the nations on the list for his short tour

tell much of the desire for a quick, happy trip.

Missing from the itinerary is the land of his

birth, Kenya, where both the president and his

deputy are wanted by the International

Criminal Court.

Also missing is the powerhouse of Nigeria,

subject to recent US criticism over human

rights abuses. On the menu are peaceful

Senegal and Tanzania and South Africa.

In his only other visit to Africa Obama

spent less than a day in Ghana, so in

comparison it could be said the American

president is indeed devoting more time to

what the Chinese, for one, have clearly marked

as a place of economic opportunities. Indeed

trade has been placed high on the stated

agenda of Obama’s trip, and it is there that he

can leave a mark, even if it is to, in effect,

further the policies of his predecessors Bill

Clinton and George W Bush.

Both pushed for increased trade, with

Clinton introducing the African Growth and

Opportunity Act, with its generous provisions

for preferential trade agreements between

qualifying African countries and the United

States.

Under its provision trade has soared, to the

benefit of many Africans in many nations,

including South Africa.

It is up to the US Congress to renew it, but if

Obama is to prove his commitment to this

continent, then his championing its cause

should help sway those who have thus far been

disappointed in America’s first black

president.

Are leaders born,made or just poached?

MoshoeshoeMonare

MAKAZIWE Mandela’semotional outburstand her lashing of themedia wereregrettable, but

understandable.She is right to accuse the

media of gross insensitivity,considering the journalists hoveringlike birds of prey at the MediclinicHeart Hospital, where NelsonMandela has been for the past threeweeks.

Like the rest of her family, she isin pain. Mandela is not just anational icon to her, but also a father,who was taken away from her formost of her life.

She was forced to share him withthe rest of the world when Madibawas finally freed in 1990. Herbitterness and uncontrollable angerare justified.

She and her family have had tocare for the frail Mandela while therest of us go on with our lives – untilhe is in hospital.

We only remember him onMandela Day.

“It is very crass. “The fact that my dad is a global

icon, one of the 25 most influentialpeople of the 21st century doesn’tmean people cannot respect theprivacy and dignity of my dad.

“There’s a sort of a racist elementwith the foreign media where theyjust cross boundaries.

“It’s like vultures, waiting when alion has devoured a buffalo, waitingthere for the last carcass. That’s theimage we have as a family.

“We don’t mind the interest, I justthink it has gone overboard.

“I don’t know why these peoplecome here and violate everything inthe book,” she told SABC TV onThursday.

Inasmuch as I agree with her thatit was unacceptable for some of us tocreate the impression that anyonecould lie about the state of Mandela,she must never underestimate thenation and the world’s anxiety aboutthe icon.

I agree with her that some of therumours and reporting werecallously insensitive. An Australianpaper reported on Thursday thatMandela had died.

However, I think Makaziwemisunderstood the role of theresponsible media.

The responsible media has toldthe world that Madiba is critical butstable, and allayed fears anddispelled callous rumours.

The responsible media willconvey the family and people’sprayers, their hope and pain.

Makaziwe must remember it wasthe same responsible media thatreminded the world that NelsonMandela was still silenced andlanguishing on Robben Island.

It was the media, conveying thehopes and feeling of the people, thatensured that he and his comradeswere not forgotten.

It was the same internationalmedia that enquired about hiswelfare, plight, and health to makesure that Pretoria did not harm him.

His health is not just anothersensational story, but a painfulexperience to all of us.

It is out of concern, and not just aprofessional duty, that we keepwatch at Mediclinic with anxietyand sorrow.

Makaziwe, no one will disputethat Madiba is your father and thatyou feel more pain than the rest ofus, but the world loves him too.

At least Winnie Madikizela-Mandela captured the essence ofthis moment when she appealed tothe media on Friday to understandthe family’s “bitterness” given thecircumstances, but also cautionedagainst irresponsible coverage.

THE upcoming feature onNelson Mandela, given therecent panic surroundinghis health, needs anupdate. Long Walk to Free-

dom is the definitive fea-ture film that will star Idris Elba asMandela and is directed by JustinChadwick, an English director.

I have nothing against either ofthem but I believe given the subjectmatter and our fledgling film industry,this film should have starred a SouthAfrican and been directed by a SouthAfrican. Mandela is South African, weare not merely subjects but alive andengaged in the world.

We have many talented men andwomen. The payback for Mandela’sprogressiveness, as usual, seems tocome in a manner in which ordinarySouth Africans pay the price, and aretaken advantage of.

It is to take advantage of the Strug-gle against apartheid to assume that aMandela can be played by everyoneexcept a South African, and that thereare no home-grown directors who canre-tell this multi-layered story. My expe-riences with this film’s productionteam were that they were bent on usingthe director they wanted and that oth-er directors could not bid, or provide,treatments. At least this is what hap-pened when I made the suggestion towrite an adaptation on Mandela’s book.

What you now have is a film aboutMadiba, written by a Briton, directedby a Briton, filmed by a Briton and act-ed by a Briton.

As early as 2011 I had written anopen letter to Mandela and his Founda-tion, addressing this oversight andwhat will for generations be a problemassociated with this film. I was fortu-nate to meet Anant Singh in New York

during his promotion of Fourth Grader

last year. Thereafter I tried to forge arelationship with the “pre-eminentSouth African film-maker”, but to noavail.

I raised the subject of Mandelabeing played by a non-South Africanand directed by a non-South African asbeing offensive and marginally insensi-tive directly to Sanjeev, Singh’s partnerwho is aware of my criticism of thisendeavour. I also raised the issue ofperhaps getting John Kani to direct.

What comes out of this situation isthat South African film-makers are notrespected by other South African film-makers; South Africans can only besubjects not creators of their own sto-ries, and that South Africans are seenas arrogant to even suggest ownershipof their cultural heritage. See the fias-co that surrounded the making of thestory on Winnie Mandela – where inthe world do you make a movie about afamous person without their permis-sion, even if a book was written aboutthat person?

A South African director wouldhave portrayed Madiba’s life not inromantic terms but in terms of deepcharacter understanding, context and

in unapologetic terms. I can imagine my Long Walk to Free-

dom opening with the show of splen-dour in a white suburb contrastedthereafter with Mandela’s rural lifeand the harsh realities of a black SouthAfrican in 1930s South Africa – to putus in the furnace of apartheid rightaway – for Mandela would not have hadsuch a great life if it were not for thecontext of apartheid. This is not acourt case Mandela vs South Africa,but a rich multi-layered story in whichMadiba has given and received frommany.

South Africa has a promising filmindustry but we will never get aheadwhen the most prominent among us donot reach back and find talent. Some-thing has to be noted on the point thatwas given concerning Madiba’s height– South Africans are not that tall. Thechap playing Nelson Mandela looksnothing like him. Is this a problem? Iwill answer that question with a ques-tion – when period pieces are made,don’t they have to look like the period?In this case the main ingredient/char-acter are unlike the real thing.

This is a slippery slope, and here werecall Paul Newman in Hombre wherehe played a blue-eyed Native American,and Ben Kingsley as Mahatma Gandhiin Gandhi. We should not legitimatisethat non-whites can only be subjectsand not creators because they are arro-gant, inexperienced, and don’t look thepart. That is not a reason but merely anexcuse for the underlining manner inwhich movies are made and the tradi-tion of resentment against black film-makers.

In a show of duplicity, even RichardBurton looked like Churchill in Walk

with Destiny (The Gathering Storm inthe US); James Bond is perennially

played by a Briton – personally I thinkHumphrey Bogart would have made agood Bond. Character in films is some-thing invaluable; it is the essence andthe life breath of the story. Even whenthe actor is finished acting, you tend toassociate him with the characterplayed. This to say that this would havebeen a great opportunity to introduce atalented South African to the world – achance that has been squandered.

Film-making should be an all inclu-sive process, a fun process, not anadversarial and pretentious show ofeconomic might, leaving the subjectsangry and resentful at the final prod-uct. I can imagine that it’s hard onSingh, as well in terms of raising themoney, but this is a project that wealthySouth African industrialists (some ofthem Madiba’s friends) should havefunded. If not this project, then whichone will they fund?

If we are to accept the paternalisticargument of the film-makers thatSouth Africans are not ready, then helpus – invite us to see what ready lookslike. This was our shining moment, toshow the world what we could do andwe were robbed of that moment.

There are more films to come fromSouth Africa, on Shaka Zulu; Christi-aan Barnard (first heart surgeon);Mapungubwe (the lost city); AlbertLuthuli; King Moshoeshoe; Gary Play-er and Robert Sobukwe – even WorldWar ll’s General Jan Smuts deserves afilm – but next time let’s get it right.South Africa is a talented nation, let’snot sell ourselves short.

■ Sibanda is a South African-born

American writer, film director and

author of a collection of literary poems

The Songs of Soweto: Poems From APost Apartheid South Africa.

Long walk does not lead to SA actors

Ken Sibanda

Liza van Wyk

Accepting an honorary doctoratefrom the Sheikh Anta DiopUniversity of Dakar, Senegal,Nelson Mandela says: “Africacannot be reborn while itsinstitutions of government donot respect the entitlement of allcitizens to all basic humanrights.” – June 30, 1992

Mandela HIStory

We do shareyour pain,dear Makaziwe

DEPUTY EDITOR

Japhet Ncube

011 633 2827

[email protected]

SUNDAY LIFE EDITOR

Arja Salafranca

011 633 2464

[email protected]

BOOKS EDITOR

Mary Corrigall

011 633 2440

[email protected]

CHIEF SUB-EDITOR

Kenneth Chikanga

011 633 2226

[email protected]

SPORT

Mark Beer

011 633 2374

[email protected]

ADDRESS

47 Sauer Street

Johannesburg 2000

Tel: 011 633 2265

Fax: 011 633 2216

[email protected]

ADVERTISING

Jacqueline Bayes

011 639 7136

SUBSCRIPTIONS

JOHANNESBURG 0860 326 262

daily 6:30am – 6:30pm

weekends 7:30am – 9:30 am

DURBAN 031 308 2022

daily 6:30am – 6:30pm

weekends 7:30am – 9:30 am

CAPE TOWN 0800 220 770

daily 6:30am – 6:00pm

weekends 7:00am – 10:00 am

Issue No 907

The Sunday Independent is printed by Caxton Printers at 16 Wright Street,Industria for theproprietors and publishers,Independent Newspapers (Pty) Ltd,and is registered at the GPO asa newspaper.The price,including tax,is:South Africa R16.50; Swaziland and Zimbabwe R19,Botswana R16.50

The Sunday Independent subscribes to the South African Press Code,which prescribes thatnews must be truthful,accurate,fair and balanced.If we don’t live up to the code,please contact:The Press Ombudsman, 2nd Floor, 7 St. Davids’s Park, St Davids Place, Parktown, 2193 or POBox 47221, Parklands 2121. Phone 011 484 3612/8; fax 011 484 3619.

Queries about the standards and principles of advertising can be sent to:The Secretary,Advertising Standards Authority of South Africa, 41555, Craighall, 2024. The circulation of the

Sunday Independent is certified by the Audit Bureau of Circulations,at Suite 5, 158 JanSmuts, 9 Walters Ave, Rosebank, 2196 or PO Box 47221, Parklands 2121.

Copyright:The reproduction or broadcast without permission of articles published in thisnewspaper is forbidden and reserved toIndependent Newspapers (Pty) Ltd,underSection 12(7) of the Copyright Act,1978.

EDITOR

Moshoeshoe Monare

011 633 2180

[email protected]

Obama’s visitmay yet putfocus on Africa