approximate soil water movement by kinematic characteristics1

Download Approximate Soil Water Movement by Kinematic Characteristics1

Post on 21-Dec-2016




5 download

Embed Size (px)



    Approximate Soil Water Movement by Kinematic Characteristics1


    ABSTRACTUsing the Richard's equation in the Fokker-Planck nonlinear diffu-

    sion form, unsaturated soil water flow may be treated as a diffusion-convection wave process. If dO/az is assumed a function of 9 alone, theunsaturated flow equation may be solved by the method of character-istics, and when dd/dz becomes sufficiently small, the Peclet number isassumed large enough to treat unsaturated flow kinematically. Changesin 0 with depth in the soil profile are treated as waves, moving downward.Advancing and receding "waves" are treated differently in the approx-imate analytical technique described here, with advancing wetting frontsdescribed by kinematic "shocks." The method is compared to the com-plete solution to Richard's equation for a complex rain pattern and foundto predict well the location of deeper moving fronts and also general 8patterns. The kinematic method is also shown to apply to root waterextraction zones and to layered soil situations.

    Additional Index Words: unsaturated flow, hydrology, infiltration,drainage.

    Smith, R.E. 1983. Approximate soil water movement by kinematiccharacteristics. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 47:3-8.

    WATER moves through soil in response to two forces,capillary potential gradients and gravity. Mostmathematical treatment of unsaturated soil water flowto date has focused on the description of flow induced bycapillary potential gradients. This is reasonable becausewhen the upper boundary is suddenly saturated or a highflux is imposed, flow into a dry soil is dominated by cap-illary flow dynamics. For example, much of the famouswork of Philip (1957a; 1957b) concentrates on the prop-erties of the soil diffusivity, D, which varies with watercontent, 6, and he makes use of analogy to the body ofmathematics of heat flow equations, of which unsatu-rated flow is a nonlinear variant. Philip treated the ad-dition of gravity-induced flow by successive perturbationto the capillary potential induced flow (horizontal) caseto produce a series solution. Much of the work of Par-lange (1970, for example) explores the integral propertiesof the capillary relations of the media, such as D(6).

    There are, however, several cases of interest in verticalporous media flow where gravity dominates the unsatu-rated movement of soil water. One of these cases is thevertical movement of water in relatively porous soils whenrainfall or surface fluxes are typically on the order of orless than the soil saturated hydraulic conductivity, Ks(6).This situation occurs in large areas of the world withrelatively porous soils and active recharge of a deepersaturated zone. Moreover, even in cases where flow nearthe surface may be dominated by capillary forces duringinfiltration, water percolating deeper into the soil profilemay be well described by gravity-induced flow.

    The unsaturated water flow equation is treated as a

    wave equation composed of diffusive and gravitationalcomponents. The 6 profile is considered to be a series ofwaves advancing down through the soil. A sample com-parison is made of the relative importance of the diffusiveand gravitational components. In cases such as those listedabove, the method outlined here provides a simple ana-lytical solution for following unsaturated water profiletranslation. When the assumptions are appropriate ar-bitrary temporal patterns of flux at the surface will pro-duce spatial patterns, or waves, of 6 moving through theprofile, whose movement through the soil may be de-scribed kinematically by the method of characteristics.The waves of 6 are kinematic in the sense that they aredescribed by an expression for velocity as a function of6, plus a differential equation of mass continuity. Theyare thus direct analogies of kinematic surface water waves(Lighthill and Whitham, 1955).

    Gravity wave mechanisms alone can account for a cer-tain amount of profile attenuation, can fairly accuratelypredict wetting front movement, and can treat cases in-volving root extraction fluxes and layered soil situations.The receding 6 profile during uniform drainage was ap-proximated by Sisson et al. (1980), using the same char-acteristic assumptions used here. In this study the methodis applied to the general 6 profile translation.

    MATHEMATICAL DEVELOPMENTDescription of unsaturated vertical flow commonly neglects

    the flow of air and combines the differential conservation ofmass equation,

    dt dz 'with flux q, described by Darcy's law,

    < ? = -K(8) \-~

    to obtain Richards' equation (Richards, 1931):

    dt dz dz dz




    1 Contribution from the ARS-USDA. Received 27 Apr. 1982. Ap-

    proved 30 Sept. 1982.2 Research Hydraulic Engineer, ARS, Fort Collins, Colo.

    where 8 = water content, z = depth, downward from the sur-face, L, K(8) = hydraulic conductivity, LT1"1, t = time, T,and \l/ = soil water capillary potential, L,

    For analogy to a diffusion-convection equation, Eq. [3] isoften transformed by denning "diffusivity," D, as




    D(d) = K(6) -,to obtain, with Eq. [2],

    q = -D(6)+ K(8) ,


  • SOIL SCI. SOC. AM. J., VOL. 47, 1983

    For a kinematic approach, one may return to Eq. [1], and notethat if q is assumed a function of 0 alone, Eq. [1] or Eq. [6]can be written:

    - + _ _ =

    dt de dz [7]Equation [7] may be considered as a wave equation and canbe solved by the method of characteristics (Abbott, 1966). InEq. [7] it is not necessarily assumed that diffusivity is zero, northat diffusive flux is negligible. With q assumed to be a functiononly of 0, Eq. [5] implies that dO/dz is closely a function of 8,and thus that 0-profile shape is well preserved through trans-lation. From Eq. [5], net flux is K(6) - D dd/dz.

    In general, the movement of a location on the 6 profile of agiven 6 has a characteristic velocity, vc, of

    da [8]The characteristic solution of Eq. [7] amounts to translation ofeach value of 6 according to its velocity vc from Eq. [8]. Sincesoils generally exhibit a rapid increase of q with 8, 8 profilesevolve until at some time a doubled-value 6(z) solution occursfor regions of 6 decreasing with z. This produces what are calledshock fronts, described by Colbeck (1972) in relation to watermovement through snow, and by Kibler and Woolhiser (1972)for shallow surface water flow.

    The kinematic characteristic method described herein makesapproximations which allow physically realistic treatment ofshock (advance) waves in soil water flow, and approximatesmotion of waves of opposite sense (8 increasing with z) usingEq. [7], and neglecting D 36/dz. Only the following flux-typeboundary condition will be considered:

    q(z = 0) = q0(t).At the longer times more appropriate to this method, gravity-

    dominated flow would make little distinction between thisboundary condition and a specified 80, since q0 = K(60). Theanalytic method described below does not require simple func-tional expressions for the soil relations between \j/, K, and 6. Ifused in tabular form, such relations must be continuous andhave a continuous dK/dd. A functional differentiable relationof K and 8 is enormously useful in applying the expressionspresented below. Figure la and Ib and the Appendix presentthe relations chosen for use in the examples herein.

    Kinematic Soil Wetting WavesIn soils, where q increases rapidly with 6, steep changes of 8

    with z are characteristic at wetting fronts, and such fronts areclosely approximated as kinematic shocks. Consider a region of

    soil in which 6 decreases with depth z (positive downward) from0! to 82, 6\ > 62. Assume for simplicity that 8 = 0] for z < Z]and 8 = 02 for z > z2. The change in flux, q,, between 0, and82 is

    9,1,2 = (,) - q(02) , [9]and the 8 profile between z, and z2 comprises a wave whichmoves with velocity vs(0,, 02) equal to

    v, (0,, 82) = - q(82)\/(6l - 62) . [10]Referring to Eq. [5], diffusion causes a soil wetting front profileto lose steepness and thereby decrease I d0/dz I, while the mon-otonic K(6) causes I d0/dz I to increase with time. Both D(6) andgravitational flux K(6) increase with 0, so that a stable wavefront will evolve in which a balance in the two terms of Eq. [5]exists in their effect on dd/dz. Such a balance, which preservesa nearly constant total vc, is inherent in the profile at infinitydiscussed by Philip (1957b). For a leading wave generated bya flux qu with 0 increasing from 0,- to 8U across the wave, thenet wave flux is qu qs, and from Eq. [10] the shock wavevelocity vc is constant at

    0. - o,'From this and Eq. [5] and Eq. [8] we have

    which may be integrated in two steps to obtain

    z(0) _ P"JetD(d) d6

    K(8) - qu + q, + Zc, [11]

    which is an integrated form of Philip's (1957b) Eq. [36], the"profile at infinity." Zc is a constant of integration. Kinematictreatment of this advancing wave assumes this balance discussedabove to have been approximately reached such that d0/dz isnot varying at any 6 with time. Equation [11] is the asymptoticcase in which Eq. [7] is exact, and describes a purely translatingwave, fully including diffusive flux.

    Referring again to a simple advance case, if d0/dz is negligibleat locations z\ and z2 (one is a local maxima and the other isa local minima), q(8) is simply K(8) at z, and z2 and the motionof the advancing wave is treated as that of a shock with Eq.[10] becoming

    [12](0, -The opposite case, 0 increasing with z, is here referred to as


    ,(/, cm Water Content (Fig. 1Soil capillary characteristics. 9, is normalized water content, as a function of capillary tension, ,^ in the left graph. The parameters shown

    refer to the algebraic curve described in the appendix. The right graph illustrates th