apartheid and death in sizwe bansi is dead
DESCRIPTION
Discusses the concept and theme of death in the playTRANSCRIPT
kumar.362
Indu Shekhar Kumar
AAAS 2251
Dr. Lupenga Mphande
01 October 2013
Death and Apartheid in Sizwe Bansi is Dead
Colonization motivated by the desire to earn profits and expand business has always
resulted in the tussle for power, between the foreign power and the country being colonized. In
almost, all documented cases of colonization, the foreign powers have proved superior to the
locals. After, the initial war and subsequent revolts, the process of colonization starts. It starts by
educating the locals in the foreign culture and literature and constructing laws to firmly establish
the foreign rule. A lot of these laws marginalize the local people and they are bereft of basic
human rights. Thus inequality becomes prevalent in such a society. Taking Apartheid as an
example, Athol Fugard shows us the intricate details of the problems generated by the Apartheid
laws in his book Sizwe Bansi is dead. The lead character of the book Sizwe Bansi tries to make
his subjection more bearable by changing his identity to Robert Zwelinzima. But, such a life
comes at a price. Living under a stolen identity comes paired with the fear of being exposed.
This constant fear does not allow the person to reach his full potential and enjoy his life.
Moreover, the racial segregation, as seen in South Africa under Apartheid leads to frustration and
anger which ultimately destroys the self-worth of a person. I think, rather than living under a
false identity to make his/her existence more bearable, a person should fight against oppression
and strive to overthrow the foreign rule.
i
kumar.362
A country under colonial rule faces discrimination in all spheres of life. The local worker
can’t rise to high ranking administrative positions within the organization. The menial labor jobs
are reserved for them. The working conditions for the local workers and the foreign workers are
different. The locals work in a hazardous atmosphere. Snippets of such behavior are
demonstrated in the recollections or dramatization of the characters in the play. “First stage of
general cleaning finished. We stated on the second………..spell it slowly.”(Fugard, 5). This
instance portrays Styles’s recollection. The plant was cleaned and the safety lines, boards were
put up just before the inspection of the plant by the boss. Before this incident, the local workers
did not know about the ‘No- Smoking’ and ‘Eye Protection’ area of the factory. This inherently
put their life in danger. Another instance in the recollection shows how the workers were treated
as objects which increased the aesthetic appeal of the factory. “Tell all boys they must now go
and wash themselves clean……………Armstrong on the moon.”(Fugard, 6) The workers were
asked to clean themselves. They were provided with fresh towels and new clothes. People like
Styles who worked in the hazardous section of the plant were provided with protective gear.
Moreover, the General Forman Bradley asked the workers to smile and sing happily up till the
inspection was over Such explicit ignorance for the well-being of others and portrayal of the
workers as ‘things’ to impress is contemptible.
Athol Fugard uses conversations of his characters to flesh out the evils of the Apartheid
system. These conversations shed light on the line of thinking of the character. Moreover, the
exchanges between the characters exemplify the circumstance that a black person under the
Apartheid system would face. Kolawole, explains in his article that “Fugard’s engagement with
power structures in this play is largely concerned with the effects of the misuse of power against
the marginalized, ordinary South African citizens, who like those at the ex-center in most
ii
kumar.362
oppressive situations in the world, have no input in making the laws by which they are governed.
He specifically uses the play to probe the insecurity and social tensions that can be faced by
those at the receiving end of power abuse, using the South African state under Apartheid as a
case study.”(Olaiya,“ Deconstructing Apartheid's Global Gaze: Death and Resistance in Fugard
et al/s Sizwe Bansi is Dead.”). For instance, when Sizwe talks to Buntu about the problems with
his identification card, the audience can relate themselves to this circumstance. Sizwe discussed
how his passbook card got stamped and that he was to be evicted from Port Elizabeth. Buntu
suggest a lot of alternatives, but in vain. Finally, they stumble on to the dead body of a person
called Robert Zwelinzima. Creating such an environment stimulates the audience to think about
how; they would have reacted to this situation. This renders a lasting impression on the mind of
the reader. Thus, by creating strong mental images Athol Fugard elicits the emotions of the
audience towards Apartheid.
The play also incorporates the use of the letter that Sizwe had written to his wife. This
demonstrates an event by event description of the various changes in the life Sizwe Bansi. The
account of the transformation of Sizwe Bansi to Robert Zwelinzima is descripted in this letter.
This letter is a key medium for the audience to understand, the way Sizwe wants to portray
himself to his family. This gives the audience insight towards the aspirations and morality of
Sizwe. Sizwe had to change his identity to make a living. This speaks volumes about the
condition of the black people in South Africa under the Apartheid system. This is one of the
reasons why Sizwe should have fought against the authorities in an organized rebellion.
One central aspect of this play is the comparison of the sociopolitical and existational
dimensions of the Apartheid era. André Brink, in his article emphasizes on this comparison by
stating-“Much of the impact of this moment in Sizwe Bansi derives from the way in which it
iii
kumar.362
represents an interface between the play's two key dimensions: the sociopolitical and the
existential. Sizwe Bansi has long been recognized not only as "an indictment of the depravity
and inhumanity of apartheid" (Vandenbroucke 123), but also as a "watershed" of a "new theatre"
in South Africa (Mshengu 46).”(Brink, "No Way Out": Sizwe Bansi Is Dead and the Dilemma of
Political Drama in South Africa). Brink suggests that Sizwe Bansi is constantly troubled at
having to choose between morality and self-preservation. This can be seen in the instant where,
Buntu suggests a mining job to Sizwe but he rejects it expressing concerns over the safety. Here
we can observe how Sizwe’s desire to stay and work at Port Elizabeth and instinct of self-
preservation collide. Sizwe is troubled again by the same decision when he is asked by Buntu to
change his identity to Robert Zwelinzima. Sizwe does not want to lose his identity but at the
same time he wants to sustain his family by working in Port Elizabeth. In this case the play
pertinently exploits the metaphor of ‘death’. ‘Death’ here means the action of abandoning
identity. Sizwe abandons his identity as Sizwe Bansi and takes the one of Robert Zwelinzima. In
doing so the identity of Sizwe Bansi dies and that of Robert Zwelinzima is born.
Having talked about the description of Apartheid in the play Sizwe Bansi is dead the need
to empathize with the native Africans in South Africa is felt. This is the core reason for the
success of this play. This play blatantly exposes the prejudice present in the white population
about the blacks and brings it out in a humorous way. The racial segregation of the blacks under
the Apartheid rules was extremely unjust and no human in his own motherland should be
subjected in the manner depicted in the play. Therefore, changing identity of a person to fit the
rules of the society plagued with injustice is not acceptable. Such rules and regimes should be
vehemently opposed and rebelled against.
iv
kumar.362
Works Cited
Fugard, Athol. Kani, John. Ntshona, Winston. Sizwe Bansi is dead and The Island. New
York: The Viking Press. 1976. Print.
Olaiya, Kolawole. “Deconstructing Apartheid's Global Gaze: Death and Resistance in
Fugard et al/s Sizwe Bansi is Dead.” The Global South, Vol. 2, No. 2, Africa in a Global
Age (Fall, 2008), pp. 75-91. JSTOR. Web. 01 Oct. 2013.
Brink, André. “"No Way Out": Sizwe Bansi Is Dead and the Dilemma of Political Drama
in South Africa.” Twentieth Century Literature, Vol. 39, No. 4, Athol Fugard Issue
(Winter, 1993), pp.438-454. JSTOR. Web. 01 Oct. 2013.
v