anthropogenic effects (terrestrial)

70
Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Upload: leane

Post on 04-Jan-2016

42 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial). Human Population Growth. Probably the largest ecological problem the Earth is facing today Each individual requires a minimum amount of resource Food, water, shelter, fuel - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Page 2: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Human Population Growth

• Probably the largest ecological problem the Earth is facing today

• Each individual requires a minimum amount of resource– Food, water, shelter, fuel

• If the human population exceeds the carrying capacity, the population will be forced to decline

Page 3: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

• Carrying Capacity – the maximum population size that a particular environment is able to maintain for a given period.– At population sizes greater than the carrying capacity,

the population decreases– At population sizes less than the carrying capacity, the

population increases– At population sizes = the carrying capacity, the

population is stable

• Equilibrium Point – the population density that = the carrying capacity.

Page 4: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Cultural Carrying Capacity

• ‘There should be no more people in a country than could enjoy daily a glass of wine and piece of beef for dinner.’– Robert Malthus (~1805)

• We could live at the maximum carrying capacity and devote all of our farmland to growing food for direct human consumption (all bread and water, no wine and steak)– But is this what we want?

Page 5: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Human Population Growth

• Estimated at 6.1 billion in 2000

• Growing approximately 1.33% per year (214,000 per day)

• Population will double in about 52 years

• Growth is actually greater than exponential growth

• No population can continue to grow without limit

Page 6: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Earth’s Carrying Capacity

• Difficult to estimate (what will be the limiting factor?)

• Most estimates predict about 10 – 12 billion people

(2000)

Page 7: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Ecological Footprint• Ecological footprint – amount of land needed to produce the resources

needed by the average person in a country• Methods:

1. Correct consumption data for trade imports and exportsConsumptionwheat= production + imports – exports

2. Convert to land area needed to produce the item

Awheat = Cwheat / ywheat

A=total area needed, C=consumed, Y=yield

3. Obtain per capita ecological footprint by dividing by population size

fwheat = awheat/population size

Page 8: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Ecological footprint in relation to available ecological capacity.

Page 9: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

It would take about 3 times the current land area of Earth if all 6.1 billion people consumed the same as the 276 million people in the US

United States

The Netherlands

India

CountryPer Captia Ecological Footprint(Hectares of land per person)

10.9

5.9

1.0

CountryTotal Ecological Footprint

(Hectares)

United States

The Netherlands

India

3 billion hectares

94 million hectares

1 billion hectares

Page 10: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Resources

• Ecological Resource – anything an organism needs for normal maintenance, growth, and reproduction

• Economic Resource – anything obtained from the environment to meet human needs and wants– Food, water, shelter, manufactured goods,

transportation, communication, and recreation

Page 11: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Resource Classification

• Perpetual resource – continually renewed on a human time scale– Solar energy, wind

• Renewable resource – can be replenished as long as harvest is sustainable– Timber, fisheries, fresh water

• Non-renewable resource – exist in a fixed stock– Fossil fuels, metals

Page 12: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Resources

Perpetual Nonrenewable

Renewable

Freshair

Freshwater

Fertilesoil

Plants andanimals

(biodiversity)

Directsolar

energy

Winds, tides,

flowing water

Fossilfuels

Metallic minerals

Non- metallic

minerals

(iron, copper,

aluminum)

(clay, sand,Phosphates)

Page 13: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Ecosystem Degradation

• When environmental conditions become altered in such a way that they exceed the range of tolerances for one or more organisms in the biotic community, the ecosystem becomes degraded.

• Loses some capacity to support the diversity of life forms that are best suited to its particular physical environment.

Page 14: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Anthropogenic• Ecosystems can be degraded by natural

catastrophes– Volcanoes, earthquakes, hurricanes

• When ecosystem degradation is human-induced, we call that anthropogenic effects. – Waste disposal, dam construction, wetland

drainage

• Cannot control natural degradation, but we can control our activities.

Page 15: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Ecosystem Damage

• Adverse alteration of a natural system’s integrity, diversity, or productivity.– Pollution is the major cause of environmental

damage

• Pollutant – a substance or form of energy, such as heat, that adversely alters the physical, chemical, or biological quality of natural systems or that accumulates in the cells or tissues of living organisms in amounts that threaten their health or survival

Page 16: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Acute Pollution Effects

• Occur immediately upon or shortly after the introduction of the pollutant.– Death is usually the effect

• Nitrite 96 hour LC50 acute toxicity.

• Twenty five million gallons of North Carolina hog sewage.

Page 17: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Chronic Pollution Effects

• Act in the long term; they are not noticed until several months, years or decades after the introduction of the pollutant.

• Nitrite slows fish growth chronic toxicity

• Synergistic Effect – combined effect of two chemicals is greater or more harmful than the sum of their individual effects.

Page 18: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Bioaccumulation

• The storage of chemicals in an organism in higher concentrations than are normally found in the environment.

• N and P is found in higher concentrations of phytoplankton than in the environment– Actively concentrate (transport) N and P across their

cell membranes

• Fat soluble compounds also move across cell membranes and dissolve in fats (lipids).– Tend to stay in the organism and thus accumulate– If they were soluble in water, then they would flush out

• DDT and PCB’s bioaccumulate.

Page 19: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Bioaccumulation of Tributylin (TBT)

• TBT is a chemical found in nautical paint that was found in oysters along the coast of California in the late 1980s’.– Probably caused shell thickening and chamber

malformations

• Some oysters had TBT concentrations 30,000 times higher than in the water.

Page 20: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Bioaccumulation of Nitrite

• Nitrite is taken up by chloride cells– Actively transported

• Acutely toxic to shortnose sturgeon fingerlings– 96 hour LC50 = 11.3 ± 8.17 mg/L

• When exposed to 2.17 mg/L for 5 days, nitrite levels in the blood plasma were 63 times the concentration in the water.

Page 21: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Biomagnification

• Defined as the accumulation of chemicals in organisms in increasingly higher concentrations at successive trophic levels.

• Consumers at higher trophic levels ingest a significant number of individuals, along with the fat-soluble pollutants stored in their tissue.

• Top carnivores may accumulate poisons in concentrations high enough to prevent their eggs from hatching, cause deformities, or even death.– Concentrations in predators can be a million times

higher in predators than the concentration in the soil or the water

Page 22: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Terrestrial Biomagnification• DDT used to control elm bark beetle

(Dutch elm disease).

Page 23: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Aquatic Biomagnification

• PCB’s dumped into the Great Lakes and move through the food chain

One of the reasons the Brown Pelican became endangered.

Page 24: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Brown Pelican Recovery• The Brown pelican was abundant in LA in 1950. • Texas populations significantly declined between

1957 and 1961. LA’s population was eliminated.– Listed as endangered in the US on October 13,

1970• Primary cause of decline was pesticides: DDT

compounds (DDE and DDD), and PCB’s (dieldrin and endrin).– These chemicals were moved through the food chain– Impaired reproductive success (egg shells became very

thin and would often collapse)

• Populations have since recovered– DDT banned in 1972– Egg shells have shown increasing thickness

Page 25: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Environmental Mercury

• Usually implicated in fish consumption advisories: 1.0 ppm methyl mercury warrants fish consumption advisories in the US.

• Natural Sources:– Volcanoes, soil, under sea vents, mercury-rich

geologic zones, freshwater, oceans, plants, forest fires etc.

• Anthropogenic Sources– Mining and industrial applications, waste

incineration, coal-fired plants, paint, thermometers, etc.

Page 26: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Mercury Chemistry

• Elememental mercury (Hg0) – Most common form of environmental mercury – High vapor pressure, low solubility, does not

combine with inorganic or organic ligands, not available for methylation

• Mercurous Ion (Hg+)– Combines with inorganic compounds only– Can not be methylated

• Mercuric Ion (Hg++)– Combines with inorganic and organic

compounds– Can be methylated

Page 27: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Methylation

• Basically a biological process by microorganisms in both sediment and water

• Influenced by environmental variables that affect both the availability of mercuric ions for methylation and the growth of the methylating microbial populations.– Rates are higher in anoxic environments,

freshwater, and low pH

– Presence of organic matter can stimulate growth of microbial populations, thus enhancing the formation of methylmercury (sounds like a swamp to me!)

Page 28: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Methylation• Biological methylmercury production can vary

due to seasonal changes in:– Nutrients, oxygen, temperature, and

hydrodynamics

• Measurements of total mercury concentrations in the sediment do not provide information on the form of mercury present, methylation potential, or availability to organisms locally and downstream.– If environmental conditions are conducive for

methylation, methylmercury concentrations may be high in proportion to the supply and distribution of total mercury

Page 29: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Methylmercury Bioaccumulation

• Mercury is accumulated by fish, invertebrates, mammals, and aquatic plants.

• Inorganic mercury is the dominate environmental form of mercury, it is depurated about as fast as it is taken up so it does not accumulate.

• Methylmercury can accumulate quickly but depurates slowly, so it accumulates– Also biomagnifies

• Percentage of methylmercury increases with organism’s age.

Page 30: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Methylmercury Bioaccumulation• Uptake and depuration rates vary between tissues within an

organism.• Partitioning of mercury between tissues within aquatic

organisms is influenced by the chemical form of mercury and route of exposure (diet or gills).– About 99% of mercury found in fish muscle tissue is

methylmercury (due to its preferential uptake, ability to be transferred among tissues, and slow depuration).

• Marine mammals have among the highest concentrations of mercury found in all marine organisms (liver highest concentration)

• Invertebrates usually have a lower percentage (of total mercury) of methylmercury in their tissues than do fish and marine mammals.– This percentage can greatly vary from 1% in deposit feeding

polychaetes to close to 100% in crabs.

Page 31: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Methylmercury Bioaccumulation

• Sediment is main source of mercury, but the foodweb is the main pathway for aquatic systems.

• High trophic level species tend to accumulate the highest concentrations of mercury.– Fish-eating predators have the highest

• Mercury concentrations in higher trophic species often do not correlate with concentrations in environmental media.– However, correlations have been made between

sediment and lower trophic species that typically have a high percentage of inorganic mercury, and between mercury concentrations in higher trophic species and their prey items.

Page 32: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Environmental mercury has increased due to anthropogenic causes

Page 33: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)
Page 34: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

http://water.usgs.gov/wid/FS_216-95/FS_216-95.html

Page 35: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Percent of sites in Louisiana that have mercury advisories that include each group of fish. Total sites listed = 16.

Species % Sites

Largemouth Bass 75

Bowfin 69

Crappie 56

FW Drum 50

Catfish 25

Buffalo 19

Sunfish 19

Top predators tend to be listed more often.

Page 36: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Mercury Toxicity

• Influenced by the form of mercury, environmental media, environmental conditions, the sensitivity or tolerance of the organism, and the life history stage.

• Toxic effects occur because mercury binds to proteins and alters protein production or synthesis.– Effects include reproductive impairment, growth

inhibition, developmental abnormalities, and altered behavioral responses

– Can affect the nervous system (coordination, sense of touch, taste, and sight

– Particularly damaging to developing embryos

Page 37: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Environmental PCB’s

• Polychlorinated biphenyl’s – a group of highly toxic chlorinated industrial chemicals used as dielectrics, coolants and lubricants in transformers and other electrical equipment, weatherproofers, and to prolong residual activity of pesticides.– Usually released to the environment as a mixture

with other chemicals

– Fire resistant, low volatility, relatively stable and persistent = good for industry, bad for environment.

Page 38: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Environmental PCB’s

• Had been used for about 25 years until PCB poisoning of birds and people were noticed in 1966.

• By the late 1970’s, evidence of extreme persistence and adverse health effects had resulted in a ban on their manufacture in some industrialized countries.

• PCB’s are carcinogenic, can cause an increase in bacterial infections, liver lesions, and genetic defects.

Page 39: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Bioaccumulation

• PCB’s are not soluble in water, but are soluble in fat.

• Therefore, they tend to bioaccumulate and biomagnify.– Can increase as much as a 1,000-fold as they

move up the food chain/

Page 40: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Environmental Effects

• Seals and porpoises– Induced reproductive impairment

• Minks– Embryo toxicity

• Birds– Eggshell thinning

• Turtles (red-eared slider)– Hormone disrupting effects with sex

determination

Page 41: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Hudson River and PCB’s

• Between 1947 and 1977, General Electric dumped an estimated 1.3 million pounds of PCB’s into the Hudson River.– Source’s were two capacitor manufacturing plants

• PCB’s are now found in the Hudson Rivers sediments and wildlife.

• One study showed that breast milk taken from women around the Hudson River was seven times the amount permitted in cow’s milk.

• Commercial fishing was shut down because of PCB concentration found in the fish.

Page 42: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Hudson River Clean-up

• We can do nothing, and new sediment will eventually bury the PCB’s.– Overtime, PCB levels in the wildlife will decline– This is the approach being taken on Lake Hartwell, SC

• We can dredge out the contaminated soil.– Physically remove the contaminated sediment and haul

somewhere else– Who wants that shipment?

• Two opposing sides for dredging the Hudson River.

Page 43: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Those That Say No to Dredging

• Mostly it’s the officials for G.E. saying dredging would not be good.– The five year project would devastate this

ecosystem– “It’s almost like clear-cutting a forest.” Adam

Ayers, GE Biologist– PCB’s would be ‘resuspended’– Could take 20 years for the fishery to recover– Many people do not want the waste to be put

near their home

Page 44: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Those That Say Yes To Dredging

• EPA and private citizen groups– Permanent removal of PCB’s is good– Acknowledge that citizens along the river will

be disturbed while the dredging occurs– Will lessen the spread of PCB’s throughout the

Hudson– Environmental dredging techniques work like a

vacuum, and minimize the amount of resuspension

Page 45: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Love Canal

• William T. Love decided he wanted to build a 7 mile canal approximately 4 miles upstream of Niagara Falls to generate electricity and allow ships to bypass the falls.

• However, only a mile of the canal was dug when he had to abandon this project.

Page 46: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)
Page 47: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Overview of the Canal area. The canal is marked by the arrow.The northern branch of the Niagara River and Grand Island, New York, are visible at the bottom of the photo. North is at top.

Page 48: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Love Canal• By 1920, Love’s land was sold at public auction

and became a municipal and chemical disposal site.

• From 1942 – 1953 the Love Canal Landfill was used principally by Hooker Chemical, one of the many chemical plants located along the Niagara River.– Nearly 21,000 tons of ‘toxic chemicals’ were

dumped at the site

• In 1953, the landfill was filled to capacity and Hooker covered it with layers of dirt.

• The Niagara Board of Education then purchased the land for one dollar.

Page 49: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Love Canal

• When Hooker sold the land, it gave a warning as to what chemicals were buried on site.

• The area then became a housing development.– Homeowners were not told of the potential hazards– An elementary school was actually built directly on the

former landfill

• From the late 1950’s to the early 1970’s residents submitted repeated complaints of odors and ‘substances’ surfacing in their yards.

• City officials assisted by covering the ‘substances’ with dirt or clay– Including those found on the playground at the 99th

Street School

Page 50: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Love Canal• By 1978, the Love Canal neighborhood included

800 private, single-family homes, 240 low-income apartments, and the 99th Street Elementary School.

• April 1978, a reporter wrote a series of articles on hazardous waste problems in the Niagara Falls area, including the Love Canal area

• Residents were beginning to question health risks and noting already existing inexplicable health problems.– Children and animals were experiencing chemical burns

from playing with dirt.– Birth defects, miscarriages, low birth-weight, cancers

and respiratory disorders were found here

Page 51: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Love Canal

• An official report came out showing the level of contamination– April 25, 1978 the New York State Commissioner of

Health issued a determination of public health hazard existing in the Love Canal Community

– He ordered the Niagara County Health Department to remove exposed chemicals from the site and install a protective fence around the area

• August 1978, then president Jimmy Carter declared the Love Canal area a federal emergency.– 239 families living in the first two rows of homes

encircling the landfill were relocated– May 21, 1980 another 710 families were relocated

Page 52: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

1980: Southern portion of the Canal, facing East.The LaSalle Expressway is visible at bottom.

Page 53: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Love Canal Today

• Original landfill area (the canal) is buried under a plastic liner, clay and topsoil in a fenced area declared permanently off-limits.– Many homes were also buried

• Rest of the Love Canal area is said to be safe and the Love Canal Revitalization Agency has sold 232 of 239 renovated homes.– Now known as Black Creek Village

• People feel safe because of the level of testing done

Page 54: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

What Is The Endocrine System• Complex network of chemical signals and

messages that control many immediate and life-long bodily responses and function– Growing taller, developing male or female

characteristics, and reacting to fear are all partially directed by endocrine hormones

• All vertebrates have an endocrine system that works with the nervous system to:– Maintain the body’s internal state (nutrition metabolism,

excretion, water and salt balance)– React to stimuli from outside the body– Regulate growth, development and reproduction– Produce, use and store energy

Page 55: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Endocrine System

• Three parts:– Glands respond to stimuli and release

chemical signals for specific target cells– Hormones are the chemical signals– Target cells have receptor proteins, which bind

to the specific hormones and set off a chain of events

• Turn on genes to make new proteins (for growth or sexual and reproductive maturity).

• Or, alter the activity of existing cellular proteins (faster heart beat, regulate blood sugar levels)

Page 56: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

How Hormones Work

Page 57: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals

• Endocrine disrupters can either be synthetic chemicals or natural plant compounds (phytoestrogens) that may affect the endocrine system.

• Endocrine disrupters alter hormonal functions by several means.– Mimic or partly mimic the sex steroid hormones

estrogens and androgens– Block, prevent or alter hormonal binding to hormone

receptors or influencing cell signaling pathways– Alter production and breakdown of natural hormones– Modify the making and function of hormone receptors

Page 58: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Modes of Action• Receptor Binding - Mimic can bind to protein

receptors and produce– Normal response, abnormal response, no response

(blocked receptor)

                              

       

Page 59: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Exposure To Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals

• Food, air, water, soil, household products and probably through breast milk and during development in our mother’s womb.

• Human health risks with these low-level yet constant exposures are still largely unknown and highly controversial

Page 60: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Endocrine Disrupters

• Synthetic chemicals found in pesticides and industrial products, Dioxins, PCB’s, DDT

• Usually have little effect on organism exposed– Effect is on the offspring

Page 61: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

PBDE’s: A Growing Concern

• Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) – a class of flame retardants that reduces fire potential and intensity of foam and plastic products.– Added during or after manufacturing to lower the risk of

fire and reduce flammability of fabric, polyurethane foam, and plastics

– When heated, they release Bromide atoms that choke fires

• Increasing amounts are being detected all over the world in plants, animals, and people.

• Some are estrogenic while others interfere with thyroid function that may alter brain development affecting:– Memory, learning, and behavior

Page 62: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Polybrominated diphenyl ethers

About 135 million pounds are produced annually

Used in auto seat headrests, furniture, electronics

Page 63: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Why a Concern

• Not much is known about this chemical, but rapidly rising environmental levels, increased exposure, likely permanent brain effects, and similarity to PCBs spark concern.

• Can concentrate in fat, thus they are able to bioaccumulate and biomagnify.

• Are also believed to be endocrine disrupters.– Some resemble thyroid hormone thyroxin and others

are estrogenic– Fetal and infant exposure through mother’s blood and

breast milk permanently altered behavior, learning, and memory in rodent experiments.

Page 64: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

PBDEs in the Environment

• Found worldwide – including the Arctic– Concentrations are said to double every three to five

years– US has the highest exposure (probably due to the strict

fire codes)

• Recent studies found:– 80 ppb in Great Lake salmon– Almost 90% of FW fish tested in Virginia were

contaminated with a PBDE– Sewage sludge contained a mix of PBDEs similar to

polyurethane– Increasing amounts are found in Arctic wildlife (grey

seals, sperm whales, polar bears)

• However, environmental levels are still lower than PCB levels.

Page 65: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Regulation

• US has no plans to bar or restrict PBDE production or use

• But, the US EPA is reviewing health and safety information on PBDEs and will report conclusions next spring.

Page 66: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Stop here

Page 67: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Global Effects – CO2 Emissions

• Combustion of fossil fuels and vegetation releases carbon dioxide to the atmosphere

Page 68: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Important Greenhouse Gases

Page 69: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Rays of sunlight penetrate the lower atmosphere and warm the earth's surface.

The earth's surface absorbs much of the incoming solar radiation and degrades it to longer-wavelength infrared radiation (heat), which rises into the lower atmosphere. Some of this heat escapes into space and some is absorbed by molecules of greenhouse gases and emitted as infrared radiation, which warms the lower atmosphere.

As concentrations of greenhouse gases rise, their molecules absorb and emit more infrared radiation, which adds more heat to the lower atmosphere.

(a) (b) (c)

Global Warming

Page 70: Anthropogenic Effects (Terrestrial)

Temperature Increase

Year1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2010

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2Observed

Model of greenhouse gases + aerosols + solar output

Tem

per

atu

re c

han

ge

(°C

) fr

om

186

0–9

9 m

ean

Average temperature over past 900,000 years

Thousands of years ago900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100Present

Av

era

ge

su

rfa

ce

te

mp

era

ture

(°C

)

910

11

12

13

1415

16

17

Av

era

ge

su

rfa

ce

te

mp

era

ture

(°C

)

Average temperature over past 130 years

Year1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

13.6

13.8

14.0

14.2

14.4

14.6

14.8

15.0