annual beap report february 24, 2011

Annual BEAP ReportFebruary 24, 2011

28th Annual BPD ConferenceCincinnati, Ohio

BEAP TeamVicky BuchanColorado State [email protected]

Brian ChristensonLewis-Clark State [email protected]://www.lcsc.edu/bchristenson

Ruth Gerritsen-McKaneUniversity of [email protected]

Tobi DeLong HamiltonUniversity of Nebraska at [email protected]

Roy (Butch) RodenhiserBoise State [email protected]

Marshall [email protected]

Erin GerdesGraduate Student: Colorado State University

mailto:[email protected]


http://www.lcsc.edu/bchristenson

http://www.lcsc.edu/bchristenson






To Access BEAP

• http://beap.utah.edu/Or• http://www.bpdonline.org• “Resource Center”• BEAP

– Resource Center– Accreditation Resources

http://beap.utah.edu/

http://www.bpdonline.org/

Foundation Curriculum Assessment Instrument

Purpose of the FCAI

1. Provides Pre/Post test in seven major curricular areas of a BSW program

2. Provides a direct measure to assist programs with evaluation of their curriculum

3. Assists with identification of curricular areas that may need attention

4. Provides national comparative data

Curricular Components Curriculum Area Number of

Questions

Practice 13

Human Behavior & Social Environment 10

Policy 9

Research 9

Ethics and values 8

Diversity 8

Social and Economic Justice 7

Sample HBSE Question

• The concept “person-in-environment” includes which of the following:a. Clients are influenced by their environmentb. Clients influence their environmentc. Behavior is understood in the context of

one’s environmentd. All of the above

Sample Practice Question

• Determining progress toward goal achievement is one facet of the _____ stage.

– a. Engagement – b. Evaluation – c. Assessment – d. Planning

Testing History – 2006-2010 • Version 3 1 Test 65 ?s n= 305• Version 4 1 test55 ?s n= 381• Version 5 1 test82 ?s n= 286• Version 6 1 test74 ?s n= 36• Version 7 1 test72 ?s n= 318• Version 8 1 test 64 ?s n=2231

TOTAL =3557

Reliability Testing

• Version 8–Tested in two junior practice classes–Students tested twice, 2 weeks apart–Pearson’s correlation coefficient

• r = .86

– a

Item difficulty index

• Overall difficulty or average should be around .5 (Cohen & Swerdlik, 2005)

• FCAI = .523 (n=415)

• “This is a very good difficulty level for the test.Not likely to misrepresent the knowledge level of test takers”.

Expansion beyond BSW

• Based upon CSWE assertions related to educational levels in social work education, we expanded testing to three additional groups: – MSW foundation students:

• entering • exiting

– Advanced standing students: • entering

Mean Scores by Educational Level – Version 8

Program level

N Mean Score

Std Dev Min Max

BSW entering 808 31.33 7.59 10 57

BSW exiting 719 39.77 7.71 9 58

MSW F entering 302 37.25 7.38 16 54

MSW F exiting 274 41.88 7.91 11 59

Advanced Standing entering

128 41.75 6.02 25 55

Pre/post test for differenceBSW & MSW Foundation

Groups by pre/post scores

Mean Pre test Score

Mean Post test score

SD t-value

Sig.

BSW ENTERING/BSW EXITING

31.33 39.77 7.7 21.51

.000

MSW F ENTERING/MSW F EXITING

37.21 41.88 3.4 7.32 .000

Tests of Difference by Educational Level

Groups by Educational level

Mean MSW Exit Score

Mean BSW Exit Score

SD t-value Sig/P-value

41.88 39.77 1.0 3.78 .000

Tests of Difference by Educational Level

Groups by Educ. Level

BSW exiting

Advanced Standing

S D t-value

Sig.

39.77 41.75 .57 2.76 .006

BSW Entering BSW Exiting t-test p-value

808 719

Total Score (64) 31.33 39.77 21.51 .000

Practice (13) 6.75 9.24 22.75 .000

HBSE (10) 5.65 6.51 9.66 .000

Policy (9) 3.66 4.64 10.98 .000

Research (9) 3.41 4.66 14.22 .000

Ethics (8) 4.09 5.40 16.99 .000

Diversity (8) 3.90 4.64 9.05 .000

Social & Econ Justice (7) 3.86 4.67 9.91 .000

Domain Comparisons- Version 8 Overall

MSW Entering MSW Exiting t-test p-value

N 302 274

Total Score (64) 37.25 41.88 7.32 .000

Practice (13) 8.46 9.59 6.81 .000

HBSE (10) 6.13 6.81 4.83 .000

Policy (9) 4.36 5.20 5.45 .000

Research (9) 4.50 5.31 5.27 .000

Ethics (8) 4.68 5.23 5.20 .000

Diversity (8) 4.69 4.60 0.58 .564



BSW Exiting Advanced Standing t-test p-value

N 646 128

Total Score (64) 40.79 41.75 2.76 .006

Practice (13) 9.57 9.80 2.70 .007

HBSE (10) 6.58 6.62 0.71 .477

Policy (9) 4.78 4.92 1.68 .095

Research (9) 4.82 4.73 0.41 .684

Ethics (8) 5.52 5.62 1.74 .084

Diversity (8) 4.73 5.02 2.57 .011


Domain Comparisons-Version 8 Overall

BSW Exiting MSW Exiting t-test p-value

N 646 274

Total Score (64) 40.79 41.88 3.78 .000

Practice (13) 9.57 9.59 2.40 .017

HBSE (10) 6.58 6.81 2.49 .013

Policy (9) 4.78 5.20 4.29 .000

Research (9) 4.82 5.31 5.03 .000

Ethics (8) 5.52 5.23 1.79 .074

Diversity (8) 4.73 4.60 0.37 .709



Foundation Curriculum Assessment Instrument (FCAI)Program Name: Students are: Entering BSW Program ______ Exiting BSW Program _______

Month ____, Year ____, Semester ____I. Program Cumulative Scores Compared with all Student

Scores

N = Score Range

SD t-test Value

p

Program

National

II. Program: Section Scores Compared with all FCAI Section

Curricular Area

ProgramM

ProgramSD

NationalM

ProgramSD

t-test value

p

Practice

HBSE

Policy

Research

Ethics & ValuesDiversity

Social & Econ Justice

III. Program: BSW Student Scores by Individual Curricular Area

Curricular Area Question

SuggestedCompetency

Cumulative Correct

Mean(% correct for

question)

Practice

Question 1 2.1.1C

Question 2 2.1.10A

Question 3 2.1.3A, 2.1.9A, 2.1.10A, D

Field Practicum/Placement Assessment Instrument

(FPPAI)

• In response to evaluate social work program outcomes related to the 2008 EPAS competencies and practice behaviors

• The need for a field/practicum assessment that measures competencies related to practice behaviors

Need for Field Evaluation

• Initial Piloting was conducted May 2008

• Second Piloting was conducted in Fall 2008 /Spring 2009

• Third Piloting phase was conducted Fall 2009

• Full implementation: Fall 2010

FPPAI Piloting Phases

• 55 Likert Scale questions measuring practice behaviors linked to the EPAS 2008 competencies.

• Qualitative feedback form for each domain available for program use.

• Will be available online and in print format.• Individual program outcomes report with national comparisons.• Individual program outcomes report with national comparisons

for EPAS 2008 Competencies & Practice Behaviors• Can be used as a final field assessment and mid-test/post test

design. • MSW pilot in the planning stages.

Assessment Methodology

FPPAI Scale

Educational Policy

2.1.1—Identify as a professional social worker and conduct oneself accordingly

Practice Behavior

use supervision and consultation

Measures

BEAP-Exit

BEAP-FPPAI

BEAP-Employer

BEAP-Graduate

BEAP & EPAS 2008

FPPAI Reporting and EPAS 2008 Overview: Click on the screen to see the video.

If your program is interested in being a part of the national ”MSW Foundation Online” pilot, please access the FPPAI website:

http://www.lcsc/bchristenson/fpai.htmDr. Brian Christenson:

– [email protected]

Dr. Ruth Gerritsen-McKane:– [email protected]

Call for Foundation Year MSW Participation

http://www.lcsc/bchristenson/fpai.htm



http://beap.socwk.utah.edu/

http://beap.socwk.utah.edu/

What BEAP can do for your program

• Student demographics• Assessment on Knowledge, Skills, & Values• Employment information• Advising feedback• Professional development of students &

alumni/ae• Peer comparison by region, program type,

auspice & nationally• …and more

BEAP Instruments & EPAS Competencies/Practice Behaviors

The Matrix

2.1.6—Engage in research-informed practice and practice-informed research.

A.Use practice experience to inform scientific inquiry

B. Use research evidence to inform practice

Graduate

C19, 20, 21

E4

Exit

D20

D19

Employer

Q14

FCAI

31-39

FPPAI

23,36,37,38

23,36,37,38

BEAP & EPAS 2008

BEAP InstrumentsNational Overview of Data

2010

Sample vs. Population Program Type

2000-2007Entrance

2008Entrance

2009Entrance

2010Entrance

Overall

Program Type

N % N % N % N % BEAP %

BSW Only 845 81.5 60 73.9 83 86.6 70.3

Combined Programs 192 18.5 10 26.1 17 13.4 29.7

Total 1037 100 70 100 100 100 100

Sample Profile Overview of all Respondents*

2000-2007Respondents

2008Respondents

2009Respondents

2010Respondents

Overall Respondents

Entrance 28,296 2,287 524 1,374 32,481

Exit 16,850 2,157 761 623 20,391

Alumni 4,916 337 192 101 5,546

Employer 1,794 118 51 40 2,003

Totals 51,856 4,899 1,528 2,138 60,421

*Note: SWVI no longer reported

Sample Profile Response Rates

Instrument2000-2007Average %

2008Average %

2009Average %

2010Average %

OverallAverage %

Entrance 96.01 96.10 91.42 97.72 96.02

Exit 93.62 94.01 91.98 96.60 93.69

Alumni 45.21 45.06 36.39 31.91 44.65

Employer 30.45 31.40 24.40 10.00 29.94

Auspices of College or University(2010 Entrance)

Auspice Program Percentage Student Percentage

Public(#schools) 85.2%

Private Denominational(#schools)

9.1%

Private Non-Denominational(#schools)

5.7%

Ethnicity at EntranceEthnicity

2000-2007 % N= 28,296

2008 % N= 2,287

2009 % N= 524

2010 %N= 1,374

Overall %N= 32,481

European/Caucasian 66.5 66.9 57.1 59.8 66.1

African/Black 18.0 16.5 25.2 19.6 18.1

Native American 9.7 8.7 5.9 5.5 9.4

Other 3.7 3.8 2.7 5.1 3.8

Other Hispanic 4.0 4.0 6.5 4.9 4.1

Asian/Pacific Islander 3.4 3.9 2.9 2.9 3.4

Chicano/Mexican 3.0 3.5 4.6 4.0 3.1

Puerto Rican 1.6 1.6 3.6 2.3 1.7

Note: Percentages equal more than 100% due to multiple self-reported ethnicities.

Financial Aid at Entrance- 2000-2009

Aid Source2000-2007 %

N= 28,2962008 % N= 2,287

2009 % N= 524

Overall %N= 31,107

Self Work/Savings 78.6 81.0 75.0 78.7

Loan* 77.5 81.0 89.7 77.9

Grant* 75.7 72.4 82.0 75.6

Family Assistance 44.1 41.1 39.5 43.8

*Includes Federal and State only.

2010 Financial Aid at Entrance

Aid Source2010%

N= 1,374

College or University Funds 55.2

Loan* 76.1

Grant* 82.6

Private Organization Funds 30.0

*Includes Federal and State only.

Plan to be Employed During BSW Education

(Reported at Entrance)

2000-2007 % N= 28,296

2008 % N= 2,287

2009 % N= 524

2010 %N= 1,374

Overall %N= 32,481

Plan to be Employed 80.9 80.5 73.7 81.2 80.6

EducationalPlans

2000-2007 %N= 16,850

2008 %N= 2,157

2009 %N= 761

2010 %N= 623

Overall %N= 20,391

Have Future Educational Plans

85.8 84.6 86.5 82.5 85.6

MSW 78.6 79.4 80.7 79.3 78.8

Other MA 11.7 11.3 12.6 12.7 11.7

Other BA 3.0 2.9 3.0 2.6 3.0

Note: Percentages equal more than 100% due to multiple self-reported future educational plans.

Future Educational Plans-Exit

KSV- Exit

Mean Score 2000-2007 2008 2009 2010* Overall

Knowledge 7.38 7.38 7.25 7.15 7.37

Skills 7.46 7.48 7.31 7.34 7.45

Values 8.71 8.73 8.56 8.26 8.69

(Scale of 0-10)

*2010 Likert scale changed from 0-10 to 1-9

Exit Advising Scores

2000-2007

N= 16,850

2008 N= 2,157

2009 N= 761

2010 * N= 623

Overall Average

N= 20,391

Course selection/curriculum planning 6.98 6.95 6.71 6.93 6.97

Professional advising 6.83 6.85 6.44 6.39 6.80

Career planning 6.29 6.29 5.94 5.85 6.27

(Scale of 0-10)

*2010 Likert scale changed from 0-10 to 1-9

2010 Advising Scored by Auspice- ExitCourse Selection and Curriculum Planning

Planning for Further Education Professional Advising

Private Denominational College or University(# Schools)

8.12 7.51 7.19

Private-NonDenominational College or University(# Schools)

6.22 6.07 5.38

Public College orUniversity(# Schools)

6.61 6.03 5.43

(Scale of 1-9)

2010 Advising Scores by Program Type-Exit

Course Selection and Curriculum Planning*

Planning for Further Education*

Professional Advising*

BSW Only(# Programs)

7.19 6.67 6.15

Combined Programs(# Programs)

6.50 5.91 5.34

N= 568t- test*p= .000

(Scale of 1-9)

Current Employment Information Primary Function- Exit

n= number reporting

Primary Function2000-2005 %

n=35362006 %

n=6882007 %

n=7312008 %

n=563Overall %

n=5857

Generalist Practice 39.2 38.2 35.3 38.7 38.5

Direct Practice with Individuals, Families, or Groups

25.0 25.7 26.1 25.8 25.0

Training 10.8 11.3 12.2 11.7 11.3

Administration 8.5 7.3 8.3 7.1 8.3

Other Functions 5.0 4.5 6.4 6.2 5.3

Current Employment InformationPrimary Functions-Exit

Primary Function2000-2009 %

n=6,2792010 %n= 623

Administration/Management 8.3 4.3

Direct Practice with Individuals, Families, or Groups 25.0 37.3

Practice with Communities -- 4.5

Practice with Organizations -- 6.1

Policy Analysis/Practice -- 2.6

Research & Evaluation -- 2.6

Supervision -- 5.3

Teaching/Training 11.3 6.3

Current Employment Information Primary Role- Exit

Primary Function2010 %n= 623

Case Manager 9.8Advocate 8.5Counselor 6.0Teacher/Educator/Coach 5.6Enabler/Facilitator 5.3Outreach 3.7Coordinator 2.2Convener/Mediator 2.1Planner 1.7

n= number reporting

Client Systems- Alumni/ae

2000-2007 %N= 4,916

2008 %N= 337

2009 %N= 192

2010 %N= 101

Overall %N= 5,546

Individual Clients 65.5 67.7 65.1 45.5 65.3

Family Clients 61.8 61.7 29.7 23.8 60.0

Group Clients 35.6 34.7 29.2 23.8 35.1

Organization Client 27.3 28.5 24.0 17.8 27.1

Community Clients 24.6 25.2 53.6 42.6 26.0

Other Client systems 2.8 2.7 n/a n/a 2.8*

*2008-2008 scores

Income Level Most Represented by Clients- Alumni/ae

Income Level2000-2007 %

N= 4,9162008 %N= 337

2009 %N= 192

2010%N= 101

Overall %N= 5,546

Poverty or Below 54.4 54.1 57.4 57.4 54.5

No Typical Income 24.6 18.7 24.1 20.4 24.2

Above Poverty and Below Middle Income

15.5 13.9 14.2 16.7 15.4

Middle Income or Above

5.6 6.1 4.3 5.6 5.6

Professional Development During the Last Year

(Reported at Alumni/ae)

2000-2007 N= 4,916

2008N= 337

2009 N= 192

2010 N= 101

Overall N= 5,546

Mean # of times used evaluation of client progress 14.66 14.96 16.27 -- 14.74*

Mean # of times used program evaluation 5.57 5.88 6.36 15.61 5.80

Mean # of times used other research techniques 5.10 5.49 4.16 -- 5.09*

Mean # of professional workshops attended 4.88 4.78 4.55 3.74 4.84

Mean # of professional conferences attended 2.35 2.34 2.70 1.23 2.34

*2000-2009 results only

Current Employment Information- Field of Practice (2000-2009)

Overall Exitn= 7,577

Overall Alumni/aen= 4,083

Corrections/Criminal Justice23.1%

Child Welfare/Child Protection19.4%


Mental/Behavioral/CMH15.4%

Youth Services8.4%

Aging and Gerontological Social Work10.9%

Mental/Behavioral/CMH7.1%

Health/Medical7.6%

Aging and Gerontological Social Work5.9%

Family Service7.5%

n= number of responses

Current Employment Information 2010 Exit-Field of Practice

2010 Exitn= 623

Overall Exit (2000-2009)n= 7,577

Crisis Intervention/Information & Referral (5.9%)Corrections/Criminal Justice

23.1%

Mental/Behavioral Health or Community Mental Health (5.3%)


Family Service (5.0%)Youth Services

8.4%

Child Welfare (4.5%)Mental/Behavioral/CMH

7.1%

Health/Medical Care (3.9%)Aging and Gerontological Social Work

5.9%

n= number reporting

Current Employment Information 2010 Alumni/ae- Field of Practice

2010 Alumni/aen= 101

Overall Alumni/ae (2000-2009)n= 4,083

Child Welfare (12.9%)Child Welfare/Child Protection

19.4%

Aging/Gerontological Social Work (8.9%)Mental/Behavioral/CMH

15.4%

Mental/Behavioral Health (6.9%)Aging and Gerontological Social Work

10.9%

Health/Medical Care (5.9%)Health/Medical

7.6%

Developmental Disabilities (3.0%)Family Service

7.5%

n= number reporting

Mean* Knowledge Scores—at Exit (2010)

BSW only BSW & MSW Combined

Test**

Public7.09 6.89 .131

Private-Denominational 7.71 --

Private-Non Denominational

7.15 --

* Mean score on 9 point scale

** t-test, N= 394

Mean* Skill Scores—at Exit (2010)


Test**

Public7.31 7.00 .014



7.33 --


** t-test, N= 398

Mean* Value Scores—at Exit (2010)


Test**

Public8.20 8.13 .406



8.23 --


** t-test, N= 409

Region I—Southeast*

Knowledge, Skills and Value Scores by Deciles

*Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, Louisiana, Tennessee

Percentile Group

Knowledge Skills Values

Mean Mean Mean

10 5.27 5.37 7.00

20 6.08 6.40 7.44

30 6.67 7.00 8.00

40 7.00 7.23 8.30

50 7.17 7.46 8.60

60 7.42 7.69 8.90

70 7.75 8.00 9.00

80 8.00 8.31 9.00

90 8.67 8.77 9.00

Region 1 Public BSW Only Programs

Percentile Group


Mean Mean Mean

10 5.00 5.15 7.00

20 6.00 6.00 7.38

30 6.50 6.46 7.80

40 6.83 6.91 8.00

50 7.00 7.08 8.40

60 7.33 7.40 8.64

70 7.50 7.85 8.90

80 8.00 8.00 9.00

90 8.58 8.62 9.00

Region 1 Public Combined Programs

Region 1 Private Denominational BSW Only ProgramsPercentile

GroupKnowledge Skills Values

Mean Mean Mean

10 6.58 6.92 7.90

20 7.07 7.15 8.00

30 7.33 7.55 8.30

40 7.58 7.85 8.60

50 7.83 8.00 8.70

60 8.00 8.15 8.90

70 8.08 8.39 9.00

80 8.50 8.77 9.00

90 8.80 8.92 9.00

Region 1 Private Non-Denominational BSW Only Programs

Percentile Group


Mean Mean Mean

10 6.07 5.83 7.24

20 6.50 6.45 7.72

30 6.78 6.94 7.90

40 7.00 7.08 8.20

50 7.08 7.54 8.50

60 7.32 7.69 9.00

70 7.55 7.99 9.00

80 7.83 8.17 9.00

90 8.57 8.77 9.00

Region VI—Northeast*

Knowledge, Skills and Value Scores by Deciles

*New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Maine

Percentile Group Knowledge Skills Values

Mean Mean Mean

10 5.65 5.76 5.90

20 6.40 6.97 7.50

30 7.05 7.08 8.00

40 7.23 7.25 8.40

50 7.33 7.54 8.50

60 7.42 7.77 8.60

70 7.92 8.05 8.70

80 8.00 8.43 9.00

90 8.67 8.88 9.00

Region 6 Public BSW Only Programs

Percentile Group


Mean Mean Mean

10 5.98 5.86 7.00

20 6.47 6.60 7.62

30 6.75 6.88 7.90

40 7.00 7.00 8.00

50 7.00 7.15 8.20

60 7.33 7.42 8.50

70 7.55 7.66 8.70

80 8.00 8.11 9.00

90 8.30 9.00 9.00

Region 6 Public Combined Programs

Percentile Group


Mean Mean Mean

10 7.33 7.62 8.00

20 7.68 8.00 8.30

30 7.98 8.00 8.60

40 8.00 8.23 9.00

50 8.21 8.39 9.00

60 8.73 8.63 9.00

70 8.75 8.92 9.00

80 8.92 9.00 9.00

90 9.00 9.00 9.00

Region 6 Private Denominational BSW Only Programs

Percentile Group


Mean Mean Mean

10 6.08 5.54 9.00

20 6.08 5.54 9.00

30 6.47 5.54 9.00

40 4.23 5.82 9.00

50 8.00 6.23 9.00

60 8.03 6.65 9.00

70 8.07 -- 9.00

80 -- -- 9.00

90 -- -- 9.00

Region 6 Private Non Denominational BSW Only Programs

2009/2010—Version 8 Participating Universities, Entering BSW

Delta State University

Dominican College

Ferris State University

Fort Hays State University

Jacksonville State University

LaSalle University

Lewis and Clark State College

Lock Haven University

Luther College

Middle Tennessee State University

Mississippi State University

Mount Mercy College

Colorado State University

Anderson University

Participating Universities, Entering BSWAuburn University

Azusa Pacific University

Bridgewater State College

California State University- Long Beach

Cedar Crest College

Philadelphia Biblical University

Plymouth State University

Ramapo College

Sacred Heart University

Saint Mary’s College

Salem State College

Slippery Rock University

University of Nebraska-Kearney

University of Northern Alabama

University of Texas- Arlington

University of Wisconsin- Oshkosh

Weber State University

Participating Universities, Entering BSW

Cedarville University

Cleveland State University

University of Central Missouri

Wichita State University

Mean Raw Scores by Grade Level-2010

Grade Level BSW Entering BSW Exiting

N 367 197

Total Score (64) 31.31 37.51

Practice (13) 6.57 8.53

HBSE (10) 5.79 6.14

Policy (9) 3.87 4.46

Research (9) 3.41 4.20

Ethics (8) 3.98 5.20

Diversity (8) 3.84 4.46

Social & Econ Justice (7) 3.84 4.52

Mean Raw Scores by Grade Level-2010

Grade Level MSW Entering MSW Exiting Advanced Standing

N 64 14 40

Total Score (64) 39.84 50.07 42.15

Practice (13) 8.69 11.36 10.13

HBSE (10) 6.84 7.93 6.60

Policy (9) 4.55 6.86 4.97

Research (9) 5.20 6.79 4.75

Ethics (8) 4.80 5.07 5.65

Diversity (8) 4.94 6.29 5.10

Social & Econ Justice (7) 4.83 5.79 4.95

Domain Comparisons-2010BSW

Entering BSW Exiting t-test p-value

N 367 197

Total Score (64) 31.31 37.51 8.63 .000

Practice (13) 6.57 8.53 9.79 .000

HBSE (10) 5.79 6.14 2.20 .028

Policy (9) 3.87 4.46 3.78 .000

Research (9) 3.41 4.20 5.32 .000

Ethics (8) 3.98 5.20 9.11 .000

Diversity (8) 3.84 4.46 4.36 .000


(7)3.84 4.52 4.80 .000

Domain Comparisons


N 64 14

Total Score (64) 39.84 50.07 6.95 .000

Practice (13) 8.69 11.36 5.93 .000

HBSE (10) 6.84 7.93 2.95 .008

Policy (9) 4.55 6.86 6.36 .000

Research (9) 5.20 6.79 3.28 .002

Ethics (8) 4.80 5.07 0.70 .495

Diversity (8) 4.94 6.29 3.63 .001


(7)4.83 5.79 2.81 .009

Domain Comparisons-2010


N 197 14

Total Score (64) 37.51 50.07 5.51 .000

Practice (13) 8.53 11.36 4.23 .000

HBSE (10) 6.14 7.93 5.23 .000

Policy (9) 4.46 6.86 4.81 .000

Research (9) 4.20 6.79 5.74 .000

Ethics (8) 5.20 5.07 0.37 .718

Diversity (8) 4.46 6.29 5.35 .000


(7)4.52 5.79 4.20 .001



N 197 40

Total Score (64) 37.51 42.15 3.33 .001

Practice (13) 8.53 10.13 3.84 .000

HBSE (10) 6.14 6.60 1.70 .091

Policy (9) 4.46 4.97 1.49 .143

Research (9) 4.20 4.75 2.09 .041

Ethics (8) 5.20 5.65 1.90 .062

Diversity (8) 4.46 5.10 2.35 .022


(7)4.52 4.95 1.81 .075


Mean Raw Scores by Grade- Overall

Grade Level BSW Entering BSW Exiting

N 808 719

Total Score (64) 31.33 39.77

Practice (13) 6.75 9.24

HBSE (10) 5.65 6.51

Policy (9) 3.66 4.64

Research (9) 3.41 4.66

Ethics (8) 4.09 5.40

Diversity (8) 3.90 4.64

Social & Econ Justice (7) 3.86 4.67

Grade Level MSW Entering MSW Exiting Advanced Standing

N 302 274 128

Total Score (64) 37.25 41.88 41.75

Practice (13) 8.46 9.59 9.80

HBSE (10) 6.13 6.81 6.62

Policy (9) 4.36 5.20 4.92

Research (9) 4.50 5.31 4.73

Ethics (8) 4.68 5.23 5.62

Diversity (8) 4.69 4.60 5.02

Social & Econ Justice (7) 4.45 5.14 5.05

Mean Raw Scores by Grade- Overall

BSW Entering BSW Exiting t-test p-value

808 719

Total Score (64) 31.33 39.77 21.51 .000

Practice (13) 6.75 9.24 22.75 .000

HBSE (10) 5.65 6.51 9.66 .000

Policy (9) 3.66 4.64 10.98 .000

Research (9) 3.41 4.66 14.22 .000

Ethics (8) 4.09 5.40 16.99 .000

Diversity (8) 3.90 4.64 9.05 .000


(7)3.86 4.67 9.91 .000



N 302 274

Total Score (64) 37.25 41.88 7.32 .000

Practice (13) 8.46 9.59 6.81 .000

HBSE (10) 6.13 6.81 4.83 .000

Policy (9) 4.36 5.20 5.45 .000

Research (9) 4.50 5.31 5.27 .000

Ethics (8) 4.68 5.23 5.20 .000

Diversity (8) 4.69 4.60 0.58 .564


(7)4.45 5.14 5.25 .000



N 646 274

Total Score (64) 40.79 41.88 3.78 .000

Practice (13) 9.57 9.59 2.40 .017

HBSE (10) 6.58 6.81 2.49 .013

Policy (9) 4.78 5.20 4.29 .000

Research (9) 4.82 5.31 5.03 .000

Ethics (8) 5.52 5.23 1.79 .074

Diversity (8) 4.73 4.60 0.37 .709


(7)4.79 5.14 4.24 .000



N 646 128

Total Score (64) 40.79 41.75 2.76 .006

Practice (13) 9.57 9.80 2.70 .007

HBSE (10) 6.58 6.62 0.71 .477

Policy (9) 4.78 4.92 1.68 .095

Research (9) 4.82 4.73 0.41 .684

Ethics (8) 5.52 5.62 1.74 .084

Diversity (8) 4.73 5.02 2.57 .011


(7)4.79 5.05 2.71 .007

Domain Comparisons-Version 8 Overall

annual beap report february 24, 2011

Documents

educational level version

fcaiprovides prepost

msw f entering302

msw f exiting274

educational levelgroups

knowledge level of test

domain comparisons version

msw f enteringmsw f