american government and organization

22
American American Government and Government and Organization Organization PS1301 PS1301 Monday, 3 November Monday, 3 November

Upload: hanh

Post on 25-Jan-2016

37 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

American Government and Organization. PS1301 Monday, 3 November. Examples of Gore Negative Ads. Sunday, October 15, 2000 Al Gore on Environment and Texas' Environmental Problems Sunday, September 17, 2000 Vice President Al Gore ad on Bush's Record as Texas Governor. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: American Government and Organization

American Government American Government and Organizationand Organization

PS1301PS1301

Monday, 3 NovemberMonday, 3 November

Page 2: American Government and Organization

Examples of Gore Negative AdsExamples of Gore Negative Ads

Sunday, October 15, 2000Sunday, October 15, 2000Al Gore on Environment and Texas' EnvironmAl Gore on Environment and Texas' Environmental Problemsental Problems

Sunday, September 17, 2000Sunday, September 17, 2000Vice President Al Gore ad on Bush's Vice President Al Gore ad on Bush's Record as Texas GovernorRecord as Texas Governor

Page 3: American Government and Organization

Examples of Bush Negative AdsExamples of Bush Negative Ads

Sunday, September 03, 2000Sunday, September 03, 2000Gov. George W. Bush ad criticizing the Gov. George W. Bush ad criticizing the record of Al Gorerecord of Al Gore

Sunday, September 10, 2000Sunday, September 10, 2000George W. Bush ad on Gore's Record on George W. Bush ad on Gore's Record on Campaign Finance Reform and School Campaign Finance Reform and School ReformReform

Page 4: American Government and Organization

Examples of Positive AdsExamples of Positive Ads

Sunday, October 01, 2000Sunday, October 01, 2000Gore on Family ValuesGore on Family Values

Sunday, October 22, 2000Sunday, October 22, 2000Bush on his Education Record in TexasBush on his Education Record in Texas

Page 5: American Government and Organization

Controversial AdvertisingControversial Advertising

Democrats accused GOP Democrats accused GOP operatives of trying to send operatives of trying to send subliminal messages to subliminal messages to voters by highlighting part of voters by highlighting part of the word “bureaucrats” on the word “bureaucrats” on screen for several frames.screen for several frames.

Page 6: American Government and Organization

Campaign MoneyCampaign Money

A good candidate and a good message are not A good candidate and a good message are not enough. Without money, the voters do not see enough. Without money, the voters do not see the candidate or hear the message.the candidate or hear the message.In contemporary candidate-centered campaigns, In contemporary candidate-centered campaigns, candidates (as opposed to the party candidates (as opposed to the party organizations) must assemble their own organizations) must assemble their own campaign teams, raise their own money, hire campaign teams, raise their own money, hire consultants and technical specialists, and design consultants and technical specialists, and design and execute their own individual campaign and execute their own individual campaign strategies.strategies.Recent elections reflect the rise in cost.Recent elections reflect the rise in cost.

Page 7: American Government and Organization

Regulating Campaign MoneyRegulating Campaign Money

Taxpayers partially finance presidential Taxpayers partially finance presidential campaigns, but most of the money spent on campaigns, but most of the money spent on congressional elections comes from private congressional elections comes from private sources.sources.

But money is distributed very unequally, thus its But money is distributed very unequally, thus its role in electoral politics threatens democratic role in electoral politics threatens democratic equality and raises the suspicion that elected equality and raises the suspicion that elected officials will serve as the agents of their officials will serve as the agents of their contributors rather than their constituents.contributors rather than their constituents.

Page 8: American Government and Organization

Efforts to Regulate Campaign MoneyEfforts to Regulate Campaign Money

Prior to the 1970s campaign money was Prior to the 1970s campaign money was effectively unregulated.effectively unregulated.

Congress had passed some limits on Congress had passed some limits on contributions and spending.contributions and spending.

The Corrupt Practices Act of 1925, which placed The Corrupt Practices Act of 1925, which placed unrealistically low limits on spending in unrealistically low limits on spending in congressional elections, was in force for more congressional elections, was in force for more than four decades, but no one was prosecuted than four decades, but no one was prosecuted under the act.under the act.

Page 9: American Government and Organization

Efforts to Regulate Campaign MoneyEfforts to Regulate Campaign Money

As campaigns became more candidate-As campaigns became more candidate-centered and broadcast campaigning centered and broadcast campaigning became the standard, costs increased the became the standard, costs increased the demand for money, but many began to demand for money, but many began to fear that winners would favor contributors fear that winners would favor contributors over constituents.over constituents.

The legal response to this situation was The legal response to this situation was the Federal Election Campaign Act of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971.1971.

Page 10: American Government and Organization

Federal Election Campaign Act of Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (FECA)1971 (FECA)

Required candidates running for political office Required candidates running for political office disclosedisclose an itemized accounting of all an itemized accounting of all expenditures and donations of more than $100. expenditures and donations of more than $100.

Page 11: American Government and Organization

FECA 1974FECA 1974

Instituted a system for public financing of Instituted a system for public financing of presidential elections. presidential elections.

Limited individuals to $1,000 and $5,000 Limited individuals to $1,000 and $5,000 for groups. Created political action for groups. Created political action committees (PACs)committees (PACs)

Spending limits were also set for Spending limits were also set for congressional racescongressional races

Page 12: American Government and Organization

Legal ChallengesLegal Challenges

In In BuckleyBuckley v. v. ValeoValeo (1976) the Supreme (1976) the Supreme Court upheld the reporting requirements Court upheld the reporting requirements and contribution limits, but rejected and contribution limits, but rejected spending limits on the grounds that they spending limits on the grounds that they interfered with political speech.interfered with political speech.

Page 13: American Government and Organization

Soft MoneySoft Money

Concerned that spending limits were choking off Concerned that spending limits were choking off traditional local party activity in federal elections, traditional local party activity in federal elections, Congress liberalized FECA in 1979, amending Congress liberalized FECA in 1979, amending the act to allow unrestricted contributions and the act to allow unrestricted contributions and spending for state and local party-building and spending for state and local party-building and get-out-the-vote activities. These monies are get-out-the-vote activities. These monies are commonly called commonly called soft moneysoft money..In March of 2002, Congress passed a law In March of 2002, Congress passed a law prohibiting parties from raising and spending soft prohibiting parties from raising and spending soft party money for federal candidates.party money for federal candidates.

Page 14: American Government and Organization

Top Hard Money PAC contributorsTop Hard Money PAC contributors

DemocratsDemocrats International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

$2,536,525$2,536,525 American Federation of St/Cnty/Mun Employees American Federation of St/Cnty/Mun Employees

$2,457,974$2,457,974 Teamsters Union $2,369,595Teamsters Union $2,369,595 Association of Trial Lawyers of America $2,301,000Association of Trial Lawyers of America $2,301,000

RepublicansRepublicans National Association of Realtors $2,026,698National Association of Realtors $2,026,698 National Auto Dealers Association $1,687,700National Auto Dealers Association $1,687,700 National Beer Wholesalers Association $1,478,500National Beer Wholesalers Association $1,478,500 National Rifle Association $1,333,074National Rifle Association $1,333,074

Page 15: American Government and Organization

Top Soft Money ContributorsTop Soft Money Contributors

Am. Fed. St/Cnty/Mun Employees Am. Fed. St/Cnty/Mun Employees $5,949,000$5,949,000AT&T $4,398,920AT&T $4,398,920Service Employees Int. Union $4,288,096Service Employees Int. Union $4,288,096Bank of America $3,147,824Bank of America $3,147,824Philip Morris $2,383,453Philip Morris $2,383,453Microsoft $2,316,926Microsoft $2,316,926Enron $1,657,555Enron $1,657,555

Page 16: American Government and Organization

Bribery?Bribery?

Money buys Money buys timetime not votes. PACs give not votes. PACs give money because they want access. money because they want access. Contributing money is seen as an Contributing money is seen as an important advantage in getting important advantage in getting policymakers to pay attention to their policymakers to pay attention to their problems rather than someone else’s. problems rather than someone else’s. “Talking to politicians is fine, but with a “Talking to politicians is fine, but with a little money they hear you better”. little money they hear you better”.

Page 17: American Government and Organization

Where does the money go?Where does the money go?

Money is used to buy access, so it goes to Money is used to buy access, so it goes to individuals who stand a good chance of individuals who stand a good chance of getting elected. If the election is seen as a getting elected. If the election is seen as a toss-up, then it goes to both parties. toss-up, then it goes to both parties. Usually, it goes to incumbents. Usually, it goes to incumbents.

Page 18: American Government and Organization

How money influences behaviorHow money influences behavior

Money flows to members who are either Money flows to members who are either strongly in favor or strongly against. strongly in favor or strongly against.

PACs through money to members who are PACs through money to members who are against legislation to against legislation to buybuy inactivity. inactivity.

““Why don’t you think of something else to Why don’t you think of something else to do with your time”. do with your time”.

Money just changes how people spend Money just changes how people spend their time. their time.

Page 19: American Government and Organization

Criticisms of PAC moneyCriticisms of PAC money

Operate primarily to protect incumbentsOperate primarily to protect incumbentsNationalizes campaign financing and weakens the link Nationalizes campaign financing and weakens the link between the representative and his or her district.between the representative and his or her district.Accountability. Money comes from outside the district. Accountability. Money comes from outside the district. Overrepresentation of business interests (rapid increase Overrepresentation of business interests (rapid increase in bus. related PACs)in bus. related PACs)Fragmentation of American politics by encouraging Fragmentation of American politics by encouraging groups that focus on narrow interests. groups that focus on narrow interests. Weakens the role of the individual in politics ($1000 Weakens the role of the individual in politics ($1000 opposed to $5000)opposed to $5000)Undermines political partiesUndermines political parties

Page 20: American Government and Organization

The Campaign Finance The Campaign Finance Regulation SystemRegulation System

Campaign finance operates through two parallel Campaign finance operates through two parallel systems: systems:

Money going directly to candidates is subject to Money going directly to candidates is subject to limits on the size of contributions and full limits on the size of contributions and full disclosure of sources.disclosure of sources.

Presidential candidates who accept public funds Presidential candidates who accept public funds also must observe spending limits. But money also must observe spending limits. But money raised and spent outside of the candidates’ raised and spent outside of the candidates’ campaigns (soft money, issue advocacy) is campaigns (soft money, issue advocacy) is lightly regulated and not subject to limits.lightly regulated and not subject to limits.

Page 21: American Government and Organization

The Flow of Campaign MoneyThe Flow of Campaign Money

Critical to the recent reform was the fact that the Critical to the recent reform was the fact that the unregulated campaign finance system (soft unregulated campaign finance system (soft money) outpaced the regulated system.money) outpaced the regulated system.

Spending in House and Senate campaigns also Spending in House and Senate campaigns also has continued to grow since FECA took effect, has continued to grow since FECA took effect, rising by an average of about 7 percent from one rising by an average of about 7 percent from one election year to the next.election year to the next.

Much variation, however, exists among Much variation, however, exists among congressional candidates. Some raise and congressional candidates. Some raise and spend a great deal, others do not.spend a great deal, others do not.

Page 22: American Government and Organization

How Money is SpentHow Money is Spent