alternatives to peat as a carrier for rhizobia inoculants

Q1

lable at ScienceDirect

ARTICLE IN PRESS

Soil Biology & Biochemistry xxx (2008) 1–9

SBB3971_proof � 18 August 2008 � 1/9

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

Contents lists avai

Soil Biology & Biochemistry

journal homepage: www.elsevier .com/locate/soi lb io

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

OF

Alternatives to peat as a carrier for rhizobia inoculants:Solid and liquid formulations

Marta Albareda*, Dulce N. Rodrıguez-Navarro, Marıa Camacho, Francisco J. TempranoIFAPA, Centro Las Torres-Tomejil, Ctra. Sevilla-Cazalla de la Sierra, Km 12.2, C.P. 41200 Alcala del Rıo, Sevilla, Spain

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

a r t i c l e i n f o

Article history:Received 19 March 2008Received in revised form 22 July 2008Accepted 24 July 2008Available online xxx

Keywords:InoculantsRhizobiumBradyrhizobiumSinorhizobium frediiPGPRCarriersSoybeanAdhesives

* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ34 955045505; fax:E-mail address: marta.albareda.ext@juntadeandalu

0038-0717/$ – see front matter � 2008 Published bydoi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.07.021

Please cite this article in press as: Albareda, MBiology & Biochemistry (2008), doi:10.1016/

80

81
TEDPROa b s t r a c t
Many of the microbial inoculants all over the world are based on solid peat formulations. This has beenmostly true for well developed legume inoculants based on selected rhizobial strains, due to peatbacterial protection properties. Six carriers (bagasse, cork compost, attapulgite, sepiolite, perlite andamorphous silica) were evaluated as alternatives to peat. Compost from the cork industry and perlitewere superior to peat in maintaining survival of different rhizospheric bacteria. Other tested materialswere discarded as potential carriers for soybean rhizobia. Also, different liquid culture media have beenassayed employing mannitol or glycerol as C sources. Some media maintained more than 109 cfu ml�1 ofSinorhizobium (Ensifer) fredii SMH12 or Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA110 after 3 months of storage.Rhizobial survival on pre-inoculated seeds with both solid and liquid formulations previously cured for15 days led to a higher bacterial numbers in comparison with recently made inoculants. An additionalcuring time of solid inoculants up to 120 days had a beneficial effect on rhizobial survival on seeds. Theperformance of different formulations of two highly effective soybean rhizobia strains was assayed underfield conditions. Soybean inoculated with cork compost, perlite and liquid formulations produced seedyields that were not significantly different to those produced by peat-based inoculants.

� 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

82

83
C
84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

UNCORRE1. Introduction

Commercial legume inoculant formulations include powder orgranular carriers, broth cultures or liquid formulations (Bashan,1998). Peat is the carrier of choice for agricultural applications(Thompson, 1980). This substrate has been also used as carrier toformulate plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) orbiocontrol agents (Okon and Labandera-Gonzalez, 1994; Vidhya-sekaran and Muthamilan, 1995; Kishore et al., 2005). However,some countries lack natural peat deposits (Graham-Weiss et al.,1987) or the peat-mines are located in preserved wetland ecosys-tems, so that its extraction is forbidden (Daza et al., 2000). Due tothese limitations, more readily available alternative carriers forinoculants production have been investigated (Thompson, 1980;Stephens and Rask, 2000; Hungrıa et al., 2005).

An appropriate material for carrying microorganisms must offerspecial properties such as high water-holding capacity, chemicaland physical uniformity, a lack of compounds toxic to microbialstrains and be environmentally safe. At the same time, thesematerials should have near neutral or readily adjustable pH and beabundant locally at a reasonable cost (Stephens and Rask, 2000;

þ34 955045625.cia.es (M. Albareda).

Elsevier Ltd.

., et al., Alternatives to peatj.soilbio.2008.07.021

107

108

109

Ferreira and Castro, 2005). However, these properties only indicatethe potential for a good carrier. The final selection must be based onrhizobia multiplication and survival during storage (Ruiz-Arguesoet al., 1979).

Liquid inoculants simplify the production process as there is noneed to prepare and amend a carrier and the application to seeds orfield is easier. However, bacterial survival in this type of inoculantand on inoculated seed is worse because bacteria lack carrierprotection (Singleton et al., 2002; Tittabutr et al., 2007).

Inoculants are mainly applied by adhering the product ontopre-inoculated seeds stored before sale or at sowing. Bacterialsurvival on the seed is mainly affected by three factors: desicca-tion, the toxic nature of seed coat exudates and high temperatures(Deaker et al., 2004). Survival on seed directly affects the resultinglegume yield (Brockwell and Bottomley, 1995). Early studiesdemonstrated that rhizobial survival on seeds improves if thepeat-based or vermiculite-based inoculants were applied 4 or 8weeks after inoculant production, respectively (Materon andWeaver, 1985).

The objective of this study was to determine: (1) the survivalof some rhizobia strains and PGPR in different carrier materialsand liquid formulations, and (2) the survival of soybean rhizobiainoculants on seeds and their performance under fieldconditions.

as a carrier for rhizobia inoculants: Solid and liquid formulations, Soil

mailto:[email protected]

www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00380717

http://www.elsevier.com/locate/soilbio

Q2

3

M. Albareda et al. / Soil Biology & Biochemistry xxx (2008) 1–92

ARTICLE IN PRESS SBB3971_proof � 18 August 2008 � 2/9

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156

157

158

159

160

161

162

163

164

165

166

167

168

169

170

171

172

173

174

175

176

177

178

179

180

181

182

183

184

185

186

187

188

189

190

191

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Bacterial strains and culture conditions

Bacteria strains used in this work are listed in Table 1. Bra-dyrhizobium, Mesorhizobium and Sinorhizobium (Ensifer) strainswere grown in Alvarez medium (Rodrıguez-Navarro et al., 2003).Rhizobium strains were grown in yeast extract-mannitol (YEM)medium (Vincent, 1970), Bacillus megaterium Bc6 in tryptone-soybroth (TSB, Difco) and Chryseobacterium balustinum Aur9 in tryp-tone-yeast extract (TY) medium (Beringer, 1974).

All the strains were grown at 28 �C on a rotary shaker at180 rev min�1 and cell counts were determined on YEM agar platesupplemented with Congo red (25 mg l�1) for rhizobia strains or TYmedium for Bc6 and Aur9 strains, after serial dilutions on phos-phate buffer (5 mM) (Vincent, 1970).

E

192

193

194

195

196

197

198

199

200

201

202

203

204

205

206

207

208

209

210

211

212

213

214

215

216

217

218

219

220

221

222

223

224

225

226

227

228
NCORRECT
2.2. Carrier characteristics and amendment

The inorganic carriers were perlite (Spavik, S.A., Huesca, Spain),attapulgite (Smectagel, Tolsa S.A), sepiolite (Pansil 100, Tolsa S.A)and amorphous silica (Enfersa, S.A.), all from Spanish commercialenterprises. Perlite is a volcanic stone composed of a partiallyhydrated aluminium silicate. Sepiolite and attapulgite are clayminerals. Sepiolite is a hydrated magnesium silicate and attapulgiteis a type of crystalloid hydrous magnesium–aluminium silicatemineral. Compost of grape bagasse and compost of cork industryresidues were tested as organic substrates.

Cork and grape bagasse composting was performed throughpiling the material on a cement surface to favour temperatureincrease of the material. Residues were maintained at 65–70%moisture content (wet weight basis) by periodic watering. Weekly,the pile was turned over. The process lasted about 1 year. Thechemical compositions of cork compost (Moreno et al., 1995) andgrape bagasse (Bustamante et al., 2008) were previouslydetermined.

Black peat from Padul (Granada, Spain) was used as referencecarrier (Ruiz-Argueso et al., 1979). Carriers were dried to a moisturecontent of 5% in an oven (80 �C for 24 hours) and were finelyground in a hammer mill to pass a 70 mm screen. Attapulgite,sepiolite and amorphous silica were commercially dried and withan appropriate particle size (<100 mm). Organic carriers, corkcompost and grape bagasse, and amorphous silica have a pH of 7.1,6.5 and 6.3, respectively, while sepiolite, attapulgite and perlitehave pHs of 8.5, 9.5 and 8.0. Attapulgite was adjusted to nearneutral pH (7.2) with H2SO4.

All carriers were pre-packaged in low density polyethylene bags(0.05 mm gauge), covered with a self adhesive-label and sterilizedwith 50 KGy of gamma irradiation. Sterility of the carriers wasconfirmed by plating several dilutions of buffer suspensions of theirradiated material on plate count agar medium (PCA, Scharlau) andmaking growth observations.

UTable 1Origin and plant host of the bacterial strains used in this work

Bacterial strains Species

USDA110 Bradyrhizobium japonicumSMH12 Sinorhizobium (Ensifer) frediiHH103 Sinorhizobium (Ensifer) frediiISLU16 Bradyrhizobium sp.ISC19 Mesorhizobium ciceriIST83 Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifoliiISP42 Rhizobium etliAur9 Chryseobacterium balustinumBc6 Bacillus megaterium

Please cite this article in press as: Albareda, M., et al., Alternatives to peatBiology & Biochemistry (2008), doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.07.021

DPROOF

The effect of the carriers on bacterial growth was evaluated asfollow: SMH12 and USDA110 strains were grown in Alvarezmedium supplemented with 2% (w/v) of each ground substrate. Thecell counts were determined in duplicate at the end of logarithmicphase on YMA plate supplemented with Congo red, after serialdilution on buffer solution. Control treatments without substrateand with 2% of ground peat from Padul (Granada, Spain) wereincluded.

2.3. Inoculants production and quality control

A proper volume of saturated bacterial liquid cultures(108–1010 cfu ml�1), according to the moisture retention charac-teristic curves (data not shown) of each substrate, was asepticallyinjected into each sterilized-carrier bag. QFor each substrate, withinthe pF [pF¼ 3þ log(�bars)] or water potential, interval 2.5–3.5(Roughley, 1970; Thompson, 1980), we selected the appropriatemoisture content that allowed a maximum volume of bacterialculture to be injected but providing a non-compacted consistencyof the inoculant. The final moisture content considered for peat,grape bagasse compost, cork compost, attapulgite, sepiolite, perliteand amorphous silica was 42.9, 43.5, 43.2, 33.8, 47.4, 58.0 and 62.8%on a wet weight basis, respectively.

Three liquid media, YEM, Alvarez and Bergersen (Bergersen,1961), either supplemented with mannitol or glycerol (10 g l�1),have been tested as liquid inoculants. The assay was carried out in100 ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 50 ml of each medium fittedwith a foam stopper (for air exchange) and bacteria were grownuntil stationary phase.

Inoculants were stored at 25 �C and periodically sampled induplicate (independent bags or Erlenmeyer flasks). Viable bacteriawere estimated by plating 10-fold serial dilutions on YEM agarplate supplemented with Congo red for rhizobia strains or TY forBc6 and Aur9 strains. The moisture content of the solid inoculantsor pH of liquid inoculants was also determined at sampling.

2.4. Seed inoculation and bacterial survival on seeds

Seed lots of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] cultivar Osumi wereinoculated with equal amounts of peat or cork-based inoculants ofB. japonicum USDA110 or Sinorhizobium fredii SMH12 and a watersolution of gum arabic (GA; 40%, Panreac) or carboxymethylcellu-lose (CMC; 4%, medium viscosity, Sigma) to give a starting pop-ulation of 106 rhizobia/seed, approximately, taking into account thenumber of viable rhizobia g�1 of each inoculant and the averageweight of the individual seed. When liquid inoculants were appliedto seeds, a water solution of polyvinylpyrrolidone at 5% was used asadhesive and FeEDTA 0.2% as additive (Singleton et al., 2002). Tostudy the effect of curing (storage) period of inoculants on rhizobiasurvival on seeds, solid and liquid inoculants were cured for 0, 15,30 and 120 days.

The inoculated seeds were allowed to dry for 1 h at roomtemperature and stored at a relative humidity of 60%. Bacterial

Plant host Source of reference

Glycine max Sadowsky et al., 1987Glycine max Rodrıguez-Navarro et al., 1996Glycine max Dowdle and Bohlool, 1985Ornithopus sp. Temprano et al., 2002Cicer arietinum This workTrifolium sp. Sadowsky et al., 1987Phaseolus vulgaris Rodrıguez-Navarro et al., 2000Lupinus albus Gutierrez-Manero et al., 2003Lupinus albus Gutierrez-Manero et al., 2003


229

230

231

232

233

234

235

236

237

238

239

240

241

M. Albareda et al. / Soil Biology & Biochemistry xxx (2008) 1–9 3


242

243

244

245

246

247

248

249

250

251

252

253

254

255

256

257

258

259

260

261

262

263

264

265

266

267

268

269

270

271

272

273

274

275

276

277

278

279

280

281

282

283

284

285

286

287

288

289

290

291

292

293

294

295

296

297

298

299

300

301

302

303

304

305

306

307

308

309

310

311

survival on seeds was periodically determined by transferring 20inoculated seeds to 100 ml buffer solution and plating 10-fold serialdilutions on Congo red-YEM agar supplemented with cyclohexi-mide (50 mg l�1) (Vincent, 1970).

312

313

314

315

316

317

318

319

320

321

322

323

324

325

326

327

328

329

330

331

332

333

334

335

336

337

338

2.5. Field experiments

All field experiments were carried out in the AgriculturalResearch Station IFAPA, Las Torres-Tomejil (Seville SW-Spain). Allwere conducted in a loam soil (alluvial soil, Xerofluvent, pH 7.8,0.89% organic matter, 12.5 mg P kg�1, 194 mg K kg�1,12 mg NO3-N kg�1, 6 mg NH4

þ-N kg�1 and 20.5% CaCO3) free ofsoybean-nodulating bacteria. The experimental field was laid out ina randomized complete block design with four replicates. Withineach block, there were plots (7�2 m2) divided into four rows,spaced 0.5 m apart. A space of 1 m was allowed between plots and3 m between blocks. Each plot was sown with 150 g of soybean cv.Osumi. Soybean seeds were inoculated with solid or liquid inocu-lants of B. japonicum USDA110 or S. fredii SMH12 at a rate to get106 rhizobia/seed. Two uninoculated controls with or without Nfertilizer were included. The N fertilized plots received two doses of100 kg N ha�1 as ammonium nitrate, 30 and 60 days after plantemergence. Forty five to fifty days after sowing, 12 plants per plotwere dug out to estimate the number and dry weight of nodules. Atthe end of the growing season, plants were harvested to evaluateseed yield. We determined seed N concentration by the Kjeldahlmethod (Vincent, 1970) and calculated seed N content by multi-plying concentration (%) by seed yield (kg ha�1). Harvest index wascalculated by the ratio of seed weight to total weight of harvestedplants.
E 339
340

341

342

343

344

345

346

347

348

349

350

351

352

RRECT2.6. Statistics

Statistical analysis was done by means of the Analysis of Vari-ance (ANOVA) linear model, following either a completely random(rhizobia growth experiments) or a randomized block (fieldexperiments) design. Multiple comparisons of treatment meanswere done by Fisher’s protected L.S.D. method. A 5% probabilitylevel was use for rejecting the null hypothesis in all cases. Theanalysis was performed using Statistix software (NH AnalyticalSoftware, USA). Data on nodulation and yield for USDA110 andSMH12 were independently analysed because S. fredii strainsproduce higher numbers of nodules than B. japonicum (Daza et al.,2000).

353

354

355

356

357

358

359

360

361

362

363

364

UNCO3. Results

3.1. Survival of soybean rhizobia SMH12 and USDA110 strainson different solid inoculants

An assay to evaluate the possible negative effect of differentcarriers on bacterial growth was carried out by adding eachsubstrate to the Alvarez medium. A decrease of SMH12 or USDA110viability in relation to the control was not observed (Table 2). Allcultures reached about 1010 cfu ml�1 at the end of the growth

Table 2Growth of Sinorhizobium (Ensifer) fredii SMH12 and Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA110

Bacterial strains Treatments

Control Peat Grape bagasse compost Cork

SMH12 10.15 ab 10.15 ab 10.05 abc 9.80USDA110 10.04 ab 10.01 ab 10.09 a 10.01

Decimal logarithmic of viable cells g�1 inoculant. Data are mean values of four replicates.P< 0.05.


DPROOF

stationary phase. Negligible differences were observed for corkcompost and amorphous silica for SMH12 strain.

Survival of S. fredii SMH12 and B. japonicum USDA110 was fol-lowed in solid inoculants kept at 25 �C for 360 days (Fig. 1). Thecarriers showed a different capacity to maintain an adequatesurvival of the rhizobia strains studied. Cork substrate was aseffective as peat in maintaining high populations of rhizobia. Theinitial population was 1010 bacteria g�1 and remained unchangedthrough 90–120 days of incubation. At the end of the period ofstorage, the viable numbers of SMH12 and USDA110 strains weregreater than 109 and 5�108 cells g�1, respectively. Bacterialdensities obtained with perlite-based inoculants remained higherthan 108 cells g�1, and viable USDA110 cells were not significantlydifferent (P< 0.05) from those obtained with peat and cork-basedinoculants.

SMH12 inoculants based on attapulgite and sepiolite main-tained a viable population higher than 108 bacteria g�1 for morethan 5 months of storage, then slowly declined till a final counts ofaround 107 bacteria g�1. In the case of bradyrhizobial USDA110inoculants prepared with these inorganic carriers the decline wasfaster at the beginning of the assay and the final viable counts weresimilar to those raised by SMH12. Amorphous silica was not able tomaintain high bacterial densities during the storage. Number ofviable rhizobia was below 108 bacteria g�1 after 90–120 days ofstorage. The viable population of SMH12 and USDA110 strains ingrape bagasse inoculants sharply declined after preparing theinoculants and no viable cells were detected after 15–30 days(Fig. 1).

Some water loss occurred during the incubation period for allthe carriers. At the end of the storage the moisture percentage ofthe inoculants decreased 2–10 units below the original values.

3.2. Survival of SMH12 and USDA110 strains in liquid inoculants

Survival of SMH12 and USDA110 strains was also studied indifferent liquid media, with mannitol or glycerol as carbon source,stored at 25 �C. The results showed that Alvarez medium withmannitol supported more than 5�109 bacteria ml�1 of SMH12strain after 90 days of storage (Fig. 2). Die-off of SMH12 strainquickly occurred in Vincent and Alvarez media when glycerol wasadded as carbon source. Thus no viable cells were detected after 30days in these media. A decrease of pH during the bacteria growth,below 5.0, must account for the lack of viability. The remaindermedia did not greatly show changes in the pH (data not shown).

All the liquid formulations tested supported an adequatesurvival of USDA110 strain, providing more than 108 bacteria ml�1

at the end of the assay. During the first 30 days Alvarez medium(mannitol or glycerol) had the highest number of viable USDA110cells but, at the end of the assay, Bergersen medium was the bestinoculant in maintaining high populations of this strain, with morethan 109 bacteria ml�1.

3.3. Survival of other rhizobia and PGPR strains on selected carriers

Survival of C. balustinum Aur9, Rhizobium leguminosarum bvtrifolii IST83, B. megaterium Bc6, Rhizobium etli ISP42,

in Alvarez medium supplemented with 2% (w/v) of each substrate

compost Attapulgite Sepiolite Perlite Amorphous silica

e 10.08 ab 10.23 a 10.03 abc 9.87 cdeab 9.97 ab 9.86 b 9.91 ab 10.01 ab

Values followed by the same letter, within each file, are not significantly different at


365

366

367

368

369

370

371

372

373

E

OOF

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000123456789

1011

SMH12

Log

No.

bac

teri

a g-1

inoc

ulan

t

Time (days)0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

0123456789

1011

USDA110

Peat

Grape bagasse compost

Cork compost

Attapulgite

Sepiolite

Perlite

Amorphous silica

Log

No.

bac

teri

a g-1

inoc

ulan

t

Time (days)

Fig. 1. Survival of Sinorhizobium (Ensifer) fredii SMH12 and Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA110 in different carrier materials at 25 �C. Each point represents the mean values of twoindependent counts� standard error.



374

375

376

377

378

379

380

381

382

383

384

385

386

387

388

389

390

391

392

393

394

395

396

397

398

399

400

401

402

403

404

405

406

407

408

409

410

411

412

413

414

415

416

417

418

419

420

421

422

423

424

425

426

427

428

429

430

431

432

433

434

435

436

437

438

439

440

441

442

443

444

445

446

447

448

449

450

451

452

453

454

455

456

457

458

459

460

461

462

463

464

465

466

467

468

469

470

471

472

473

474

475

476

477

478

479

480

481

482

483
RRECT
Mesorhizobium ciceri ISC19 and Bradyrhizobium sp. (Lupinus) ISLU16was determined in peat, cork compost and perlite-based inoculantskept at 25 �C for 6 months (Fig. 3). Bacterial populations maintainedin cork-based inoculants were similar or significantly (P< 0.05)higher than those in peat inoculants during 6 months of storage. Ingeneral, organic carriers promoted the inocula growth during thefirst 15–30 days of storage. The number of viable bacteria supportedby perlite carrier was smaller than those maintained by the othercarriers, except for ISLU16 strain, where there were no significantdifferences among the three types of inoculants.

3.4. Survival of SMH12 and USDA110 strains on soybean seeds

The effect of inoculant storage (at 25 �C) from 0 to 120 days onstrain survival of pre-inoculated soybean seeds was followed up to30 days (Fig. 4). Cork-based (using GA as adhesive) and liquidinoculants of SMH12 and USDA110 strains were evaluated. Liquidinoculants consist of the culture media that gave the best results inprevious experiment. A curing period of 15 days was necessary forimproving the survival of strains on seeds. Increasing the curingperiod of solid inoculants from 15 up to 120 days had an additional

UNCO Vincent-mannitol

Vincent-glycerol

Alvarez-mannitol

0 20 40 60 80 1000123456789

1011

SMH12

Log

No.

bac

teri

a m

l-1 in

ocul

ant

Time (days)

Fig. 2. Survival of Sinorhizobium (Ensifer) fredii SMH12 and Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDAmean values of two independent counts. Standard error of the mean was lower than 5%.


DPR

positive effect on the survival of both strains. In contrast, for liquidinoculants an extension of the curing time from 30 to 120 days didnot increase the survival of the strains on seeds. In general, thesurvival of USDA110 was better than SMH12.

In addition, the survival of SMH12 and USDA110 strains wasstudied on soybean seeds using peat and cork-based inoculants,previously cured for 4 months. For this purpose, GA or CMC wasemployed as adhesive solutions (Fig. 5). Cork was less effective thanpeat in maintaining the survival of SMH12 on seeds when GA wasused as adhesive; however, the survival was similar when CMC wasused with both carriers. Survival of USDA110 was similar in bothcarriers with either of the adhesives used. SMH12 showed a lowersurvival than USDA110 under all the tested conditions.

3.5. Field experiments

The performance of different inoculant formulations of twohighly effective soybean-nodulating strains was evaluated in thefield. All the inoculation treatments effectively nodulated soybeanOsumi (Table 3), since they produced seed yields and a seed Ncontent that were higher than those in the untreated control plots

Alvarez-glycerol

Bergersen-mannitol

Bergersen-glycerol

20 40 60 80 10000123456789

1011

USDA110

Log

No.

bac

teri

a m

l-1 in

ocul

ant

Time (days)

110 in different liquid inoculant formulations stored at 25 �C. Each point represents the


484

485

486

487

488

489

490

491

492

493

494

495

496

497

498

499

500

501

502

503

504

505

ORRECTEDPROOF

IST83 ISP42

Peat Cork compost Perlite

ISC19 ISLU16

Aur9 Bc6

0 30 60 90 150 180120 0 30 60 90 150 180120

Log

No.

bac

teri

a g-1

inoc

ulan

t

Time (days)

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

Log

No.

bac

teri

a g-1

inoc

ulan

t

Time (days)

0 30 60 90 150 180120 0 30 60 90 150 180120

Log

No.

bac

teri

a g-1

inoc

ulan

t

Time (days)

Log

No.

bac

teri

a g-1

inoc

ulan

t

Time (days)

0 30 60 90 150 180120 0 30 60 90 150 180120

Log

No.

bac

teri

a g-1

inoc

ulan

t

Time (days)

Log

No.

bac

teri

a g-1

inoc

ulan

t

Time (days)

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

Fig. 3. Survival of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii IST83, R. etli ISP42, Mesorhizobium ciceri ISC19, Bradyrhizobium sp. (Lupinus) ISLU16, Chryseobacterium balustinum Aur9 andBacillus megaterium Bc6 in peat, perlite and cork-based inoculants stored at 25 �C. Each point represents the mean values of two independent counts. Standard error of the mean waslower than 5%.



506

507

508

509

510

511

512

513

514

515

516

517

518

519

520

521

522

523

524

525

526

527

528

529

530

531

532

533

534

535

536

537

538

539

540

541

542

543

544

545

546

547

548

549

550

551

552

553

554

555

556

557

558

559

560

561

562

563

564

565

566

567

568

569

570

571

572

573

574

575

576

577

578

579

580

581

582

583

584

585

586

587

588

589

590

591

592

593

594

595

596

597

598

599

600

601

602

603

604

605

606

607

608

609

610

611

612

613

614

615

616

617

618

619

620

621

622

623

624

625

626

627

628

629

630

631

632

633

634

635

636

637

UNC

(uninoculated and non-fertilized). The nodulation rate of anyformulation based on USDA110 strain was lower than that ofSMH12 inoculants and, for both strains, liquid formulations led toa lower number of nodules than the corresponding solid inoculants.However, the superior nodulation capacity of solid formulations ofS. fredii SMH12 was not associated with a different nodule dry mass.In fact the nodules formed by liquid inoculants had more mass thanthose induced by solid inoculants. In the case of B. japonicumUSDA110 the reduction in nodule numbers formed by perlite andliquid inoculants was related with a reduction in the correspondingnodule dry mass.

Seed yields and N content using different soybean inoculantswere not significantly different (P< 0.05) among the formulationstested. In addition, all the inoculated treatments produced soybeanyields that were not significantly different than those obtained withthe nitrogen-fertilized treatment (200 kg N ha�1), and the harvest


index of the inoculated treatments was always superior to that ofuninoculated controls.

4. Discussion

4.1. Carriers and survival of bacterial strains on differentinoculants formulations

Chemical and physical properties are indicative of the feasibilityof employing a given substrate in inoculant technology (Stephensand Rask, 2000). We characterized properties of six inoculantcarriers to determine their suitability as alternatives to peat, whichis a well-characterized legume inoculant carrier. The peat we usedas a reference carrier in this work has been used since 1975 assubstrate for commercial legume inoculant production in Spain(Ruiz-Argueso et al., 1979; Rodrıguez-Navarro et al., 1991).


TEDPROOF

0 5 25 300

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Maturity 0 daysL

og N

o. b

acte

ria

seed

-1

Time (days)0 5 10 15 2010 15 20 25 30

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7Maturity 15 days

Cork/SMH12

Cork/USDA110

Liquid/SMH12

Liquid/USDA110

Log

No.

bac

teri

a se

ed-1

Time (days)

0 5 10 15 20 25 300

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Maturity 30 days

Log

No.

bac

teri

a se

ed-1

Time (days)0 5 10 15 20 25 30

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Maturity 120 days

Log

No.

bac

teri

a se

ed-1

Time (days)

Fig. 4. Survival of Sinorhizobium (Ensifer) fredii SMH12 and Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA110 on soybean cv. Osumi seeds using cork compost-based inoculants and liquidformulations previously kept for an storage period of 0, 15, 30 and 120 days. Each point represents the mean of two replicates. Standard error of the mean was lower than 5%.



638

639

640

641

642

643

644

645

646

647

648

649

650

651

652

653

654

655

656

657

658

659

660

661

662

663

664

665

666

667

668

669

670

671

672

673

674

675

676

677

678

679

680

681

682

683

684

685

686

687

688

689

690

691

692

693

694

695

696

697

698

699

700

701

702

703

704

705

706

707

708

709

710

711

712

713

714

715

716

717

718

719

720

721

722

723

724

725

726

727

728

729

730

731

732

733

734

735

736

737

738

739

740

741

742

743

744

745

746

747

748

RRECMost of the evaluated carriers had a pH of about 7.0 or it was

adjusted to near neutrality. All had a high water retention capacityfor the optimal moisture potential for growth and survival ofrhizobia in inoculants (Roughley, 1970; Thompson, 1980). Thevolume of liquid added to adjust the carriers to the correspondingoptimal moisture potential range (pF 2.5–3.5) was higher thantheir dry weight. In addition, preliminary studies of growth ofrhizobia have shown that these carriers were non-toxic forbacterial growth.

Bacterial survival data after storage indicated that cork compostis the best alternative carrier to peat for inoculant technology. This

UNCO

0 5 10 15 20 25 303

4

5

6

7

SMH12

Log

No.

bac

teri

a se

ed-1

Time (days)

Peat/GA

Peat/CMC

Fig. 5. Survival of Sinorhizobium (Ensifer) fredii SMH12 and Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDAarabic (GA) or 4% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) as adhesive solutions. Each point represen


substrate could maintain densities of rhizobia and PGPR similar orhigher than those obtain with peat. Ferreira and Castro (2005) useddifferent manufactured residues from cork industry mixed withcalcareous soil. They obtained viable cell counts from 108 and109 bacteria g�1 in inoculants of R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii and M.ciceri after 1 year of storage.

Perlite, as has been described (Ronchi et al., 1997; Daza et al.,2000; Khavazi et al., 2007), is also a suitable substrate. However,our results for most of the strains tested, except for bradyrhizobia,showed that bacterial densities in perlite were lower than thosesupported by peat and cork substrates.

Time (days)0 5 10 15 20 25 30

3

4

5

6

7USDA110

Cork/GA

Cork/CMC

Log

No.

bac

teri

a se

ed-1

110 peat and cork compost inoculants on Glycine max cv. Osumi seeds using 40% gumts the mean of two replicates. Standard error of the mean was lower than 5%.


749

750

751

752

753

754

755

756

757

758

759

760

761

762

763

764

765

766

767

768

769

E

OOF

Table 3Nodulation, seed yield and seed nitrogen content of soybean Glycine max cv. Osumi using solid, with peat, cork compost and perlite, and liquid formulations of Sinorhizobium(Ensifer) fredii SMH12 and Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA110

Treatment Nodulation Yield Harvest index (%)

Number Dry weigh (mg) Seed yield (kg ha�1) Seed N content (kg ha�1)

T 2.5 c 14.3 b 3719 b 178.2 b 47.6 dTN 0.1 c 0.0 b 4878 ab 261.2 a 50.0 c

SMH12Peat 115.8 a 174.3 a 5275 a 304.2 a 52.2 bCork compost 121.2 a 216.8 a 5048 a 280.5 a 55.1 aPerlite 107.4 a 193.4 a 5765 a 310.5 a 55.1 aLiquid 57.3 b 156.3 a 4868 ab 258.2 a 54.0 a

CV (%) 37.0 41.1 16.4 16.9 1.8

T 2.5 c 14.3 d 3719 b 178.3 c 47.6 cTN 0.1 c 0.0 d 4878 a 261.2 b 50.0 b

USDA110Peat 82.0 a 222.6 ab 5365 a 320.7 a 52.1 bCork compost 64.6 ab 224.5 a 5216 a 302.8 ab 54.7 aPerlite 45.2 b 147.1 bc 5153 a 302.5 ab 55.7 aLiquid 40.1 b 120.0 c 5173 a 297.1 ab 55.8 a

CV (%) 52.6 41.2 10.5 10.6 2.9

Data are means of four replicates. Values followed by the same letter, within each column and strain, are not significantly different at P< 0.05. CV: coefficient of variation; T:uninoculated seeds and non-fertilized treatment; TN: uninoculated seeds and nitrogen-fertilized treatment.



770

771

772

773

774

775

776

777

778

779

780

781

782

783

784

785

786

787

788

789

790

791

792

793

794

795

796

797

798

799

800

801

802

803

804

805

806

807

808

809

810

811

812

813

814

815

816

817

818

819

820

821

822

823

824

825

826

827

828

829

830

831

832

833

834

835

836

837

838

839

840

841

842

843

844

845

846

847

848

849

850

851

852

853

854

855

856

857

858

859

860

861

862

863

864

865

866

867

868

869

870

871

872

873

874

875

876

877

878

879

880

881

882

883

884

885

886

887

888

889

890

891

892

893

894

895

896

897

898

899

900

901

UNCORRECT

Attapulgite, sepiolite and amorphous silica were not able tomaintain high viable cell counts of SMH12 and USDA110 strainsafter 1 year of storage. Sepiolite was better than the others, but thedensity of rhizobia strains was lower than 108 rhizobia g�1 at theend of the assay. Although some mineral substrates, such asvermiculite and other clays, have been described as adequate forthe production of bacterial inoculants (Sparrow and Ham, 1983;Graham-Weiss et al., 1987; Presenti-Barili et al., 1991; Figueiredoet al., 1992; Choi et al., 1998) as well as mineral soils (Chao andAlexander, 1984; Beck, 1991). Grape bagasse cannot be used asbacterial carrier. The viable cells of rhizobia strains sharply declinedafter 1 month of storage, probably due to its high content ofphenolic substances (Moreno, M.T. Universidad de Sevilla).

The cost of these substrates, including peat, and that of theprocess (composting, drying, milling, etc.) to use them adequatelyas inoculant carriers, are similar. This cost, which does not includesterilization and subsequent manipulation, represents only about10% of the final price of the inoculant. In addition, the use of organiccarriers (cork or vinery industry residues) involves a commitmentto reducing the production of waste products and local supply. So,cork compost and perlite are real alternatives to peat as carriers forinoculant production.

Our results showed that, with the best liquid formulations, itwas possible to maintain a population higher than 109 viablecells ml�1 of SMH12 and USDA110 strains at least during 3 monthsof storage. These densities are sufficient to inoculate soybean seedsand meet the recommended doses of 105–106 rhizobia seed�1

(Catroux, 1991; Lupyawi et al., 2000). Other authors, working withvarious liquid formulations amended with different polymericadditives, have obtained bacterial densities higher than108 cells ml�1 of rhizobia strains after 6 months of storage (Titta-butr et al., 2007). Other formulations supported bacterial densitiesof higher than 109 ml�1 of B. japonicum (Singleton et al., 2002) andabout 108 ml�1 of S. fredii (Videira et al., 2002). In the same way, ithas been demonstrated that commercial liquid inoculants of R.leguminosarum bv. viciae (Hynes et al., 1995) and B. japonicum(Maurice et al., 2001) strains maintained an appropriate rhizobiadensity (higher than 108 rhizobia ml�1) after 8 or more months ofstorage at 20–25 �C.

In general fast-growing rhizobia strains produce acids fromsugars after their growth in yeast extract-mannitol media, but it canvary depending on the strain and the composition of the culturemedium (Vincent, 1970; Stowers and Eaglesham, 1984; Videira


DPR

et al., 2002). In this work pH of culture media after SMH12 growthwas lower when glycerol was used as C source and viability of thisstrain decreased in those media in which pH was below 5. Thisdemonstrates that media pH, after bacterial growth and its laterevolution during the storage, has a great influence on bacterialsurvival (Glenn et al., 1999).

4.2. Survival of soybean rhizobia on inoculated seeds

Survival of R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii strains can be improvedwhen solid inoculants are previously cured. For example, Materonand Weaver (1985) found that survival on seeds increased 10 times.Burton (1976) obtained the same results with peat-based inocu-lants of Sinorhizobium meliloti strains. We observed that a storagetime of at least 15 days at 25 �C is necessary to improve rhizobiasurvival on seeds. An additional curing time of solid inoculantsfrom 15 to 120 days has a positive effect on bacterial survival.However, in the case of liquid formulations, the effect of a pro-longed curing period up to 15 days on bacterial survival was not asevident.

A period of inoculant storage before use would favour theadaptation of rhizobia to the carrier and tolerance to drying.Morphological changes, as periplasmic space occlusion, cell wallthickening and losses of PHB granules, were described in rhizobiacells from storage peat inoculant (Feng et al., 2002); these authorsassociated these morphological alterations to an enhanced survivalon seeds. On the other hand, several authors have demonstratedthat carbon or nutrient starvation in liquid cultures of Pseudomonasfluorescens (van Overbeek et al., 1995) or R. leguminosarum bv.phaseoli (Thorne and Williams, 1997) increased their tolerance tostress.

Survival of SMH12 and USDA110 strains on seeds, using cork-based inoculants and CMC as adhesive was similar to that obtainedwhen GA or CMC was employed with peat. These results areimportant because CMC is lower-cost than GA and also it is appliedto a lower concentration. Moreover, GA has a variable quality and itis less available.

B. japonicum USDA110 strain survived on soybean seeds betterthan S. fredii SMH12, probably due to a higher tolerance to desic-cation. Other authors obtained the same results working with slow-and fast-growing rhizobia strains (Daza et al., 2000; Tempranoet al., 2002). In addition, it has been demonstrated that slow-growing strains were more tolerant to desiccation in soils


E



902

903

904

905

906

907

908

909

910

911

912

913

914

915

916

917

918

919

920

921

922

923

924

925

926

927

928

929

930

931

932

933

934

935

936

937

938

939

940

941

942

943

944

945

946

947

948

949

950

951

952

953

954

955

956

957

958

959

960

961

962

963

964

965

966

967

968

969

970

971

972

973

974

975

976

977

978

979

980

981

982

983

984

985

986

987

988

989

990

991

992

993

994

995

996

997

998

999

1000

1001

1002

1003

1004

1005

1006

1007

1008

1009

1010

1011

1012

1013

1014

1015

1016

1017

1018

1019

1020

1021

1022

1023

1024

1025

1026

1027

1028

1029

1030

1031

1032

1033

UNCORRECT

(Marshall, 1964; Bushby and Marshall, 1977) or membrane filters(Mary et al., 1994).

4.3. Soybean inoculant evaluation under field conditions

Field studies demonstrated that soybean cultivar Osumi inocu-lated with SMH12 and USDA110 using different inoculant formu-lations produced seed yields and seed N content that were similaramong them and significantly higher than those obtained in theuninoculated and non-fertilized treatment. Soybeans inoculatedwith liquid inoculant of S. fredii SMH12 produced a seed yield lowerthan that achieved with the corresponding solid inoculants,although the reduction was not significant. Perlite carrier has beenused successfully with B. japonicum and S. meliloti in greenhouseconditions (Ronchi et al., 1997) or R. leguminosarum bv. phaseoli, S.fredii and B. japonicum under field conditions (Daza et al., 2000).Our results corroborate the possibility of employing perlite asalternative to peat. Compost residues from the cork industry hasonly been used before in survival studies of R. leguminosarum bv.trifolii and M. ciceri (Ferreira and Castro, 2005). We have demon-strated that this substrate can support and maintain a similar orhigher population of microorganisms than peat during the storageand can be employed as alternative to peat for soybeans inoculantsunder field conditions. Several studies have shown that liquidinoculants applied on seed can produce seed yields similar to thoseobtained with peat-based inoculants (Kremer and Peterson, 1983;Hynes et al., 1995; Hynes et al., 2001; Singleton et al., 2002; Thaoet al., 2002; Tittabutr et al., 2007). However, other authors did notobtain as good results with liquid formulations in comparison withthe solid ones (Rice et al., 2000; Kyei-Boahen et al., 2002; Claytonet al., 2004a; Clayton et al., 2004b).

5. Conclusions

Alternative substrates to peat can be used as carriers for legumebacteria. We tested six organic and inorganic materials with severalbacteria. Compost cork and perlite gave as good results as peat interms of support bacterial growth and maintain a long survival ofinoculated strains, as well as survival on soybean seeds. Some liquidformulations are adequate for growth and survival of soybeanrhizobia strains for at least 3 months of storage. Under fieldconditions those formulations led to soybean yield componentssimilar to those using traditional peat-based inoculants.

References

Bashan, Y., 1998. Inoculants of plant growth-promoting bacteria for use inagriculture. Biotechnology Advances 16, 729–770.

Beck, D.P., 1991. Suitability of charcoal-amended mineral soil as carrier forRhizobium inoculants. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 23, 41–44.

Bergersen, F.J., 1961. The growth of Rhizobium in synthetic media. Australian Journalof Biological Sciences 14, 349–360.

Beringer, J.E., 1974. R-factor transfer in Rhizobium leguminosarum. Journal of GeneralMicrobiology 84, 188–198.

Brockwell, J., Bottomley, P.J., 1995. Recent advances in inoculant technology andprospects for the future. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 27, 683–697.

Burton, J.C., 1976. Methods of inoculating seeds and their effect on the survival ofrhizobia. In: Nutman, P.S. (Ed.), Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation in Plants.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 175–189.

Bushby, H.V.A., Marshall, K.C., 1977. Some factors affecting the survival of root-nodule bacteria on desiccation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 9, 143–147.

Bustamante, M.A., Paredes, C., Moral, R., Agullo, E., Perez-Murcia, M.D., Abad, M.,2008. Composts from distillery wastes as peat substitutes for transplantproduction. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 52, 792–799.

Catroux, G., 1991. Inoculant quality standards and controls in France. In:Thompson, J.A. (Ed.), Report on the Expert Consultation on Legume InoculantProduction and Quality Control. FAO, Rome, pp. 113–120.

Chao, W.L., Alexander, M., 1984. Mineral soils as carriers for Rhizobium inoculants.Applied and Environmental Microbiology 47, 94–97.

Choi, G.J., Park, G.J., Hur, H., Lim, Y.C., Park, B.H., 1998. Preparation of bentonite andvermiculite mixture-based inoculant for alfalfa. Journal of Agro-EnvironmentScience 40, 57–61.


DPROOF

Clayton, G.W., Rice, W.A., Lupwayi, N.Z., Johnston, A.M., Lafond, G.P., Grant, C.A.,Walley, F., 2004a. Inoculant formulation and fertilizer nitrogen effects on fieldpea: nodulation, N2 fixation and nitrogen partitioning. Canadian Journal ofPlant Science 84, 79–88.

Clayton, G.W., Rice, W.A., Lupwayi, N.Z., Johnston, A.M., Lafond, G.P., Grant, C.A.,Walley, F., 2004b. Inoculant formulation and fertilizer nitrogen effects on fieldpea: crop yield and seed quality. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 84, 89–96.

Daza, A., Santamarıa, C., Rodrıguez-Navarro, D.N., Camacho, M., Orive, R.,Temprano, F., 2000. Perlite as a carrier for bacterial inoculants. Soil Biology andBiochemistry 32, 567–572.

Deaker, R., Roughley, R.J., Kennedy, I.R., 2004. Legume seed inoculationtechnologyda review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36, 1275–1288.

Dowdle, S.F., Bohlool, B.B., 1985. Predominance of fast growing Rhizobium japonicumin soybean field in the People’s Republic of China. Applied and EnvironmentalMicrobiology 50, 1171–1176.

Feng, L., Roughley, R.J., Copeland, L., 2002. Morphological changes of rhizobia inpeat cultures. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 68, 1064–1070.

Ferreira, E.M., Castro, I.V., 2005. Residues of the cork industry as carriers for theproduction of legumes inoculants. Silva Lusitana 13, 159–167.

Figueiredo, M.D.V.B., Stamford, N.P., Vidor, C., Vilar, J.J., Filho, E.C.O., 1992. Sobrevi-vencia do Bradyrhizobium sp. em substratos alternativos. PesquisaAgropecuaria Brasileira Brasilia 27, 1497–1506.

Glenn, A.R., Reeve, W.G., Tiwari, R.P., Dilworth, M.J., 1999. Acid tolerance in rootnodule bacteria. In: Bacterial Responses to pH. Wiley, J. & Sons, New York, pp.112–130.

Graham-Weiss, L., Bennett, M.L., Paau, A.S., 1987. Production of bacterial inoculantsby direct fermentation on nutrient-supplemented vermiculite. Applied andEnvironmental Microbiology 53, 2138–2140.

Gutierrez-Manero, F.J., Probanza, A., Ramos, B., Colon-Flores, J.J., Lucas-Garcıa, J.A.,2003. Effects of culture filtrates of rhizobacteria isolated from wild lupine ongermination, growth and biological nitrogen fixation of lupine seedlings.Journal of Plant Nutrition 26, 1101–1115.

Hungrıa, M., Loureiro, M.F., Mendes, I.C., Campo, R.J., Graham, P.H., 2005. Inoculantpreparation, production and application. In: Werner, D., Newton, W.E. (Eds.),Nitrogen Fixation in Agriculture, Forestry, Ecology and the Environment.Springer, Netherlands, pp. 223–253.

Hynes, R.K., Craig, K.A., Covert, D., Smith, C.R., Rennie, R.J., 1995. Liquid rhizobialinoculants for lentil and field pea. Journal of Production Agriculture 8, 547–552.

Hynes, R.K., Jans, D.C., Bremer, E., Lupwayi, N.Z., Rice, W.A., Clayton, G.W.,Collins, M.M., 2001. Rhizobium population dynamics in the pea rhizosphere ofrhizobial inoculant strain applied in different formulations. Canadian Journal ofMicrobiology 47, 595–600.

Khavazi, K., Rejali, F., Seguin, P., Miransari, M., 2007. Effects of carrier, sterilisationmethod, and incubation on survival of Bradyrhizobium japonicum in soybean(Glycine max L.) inoculants. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 41, 780–784.

Kishore, G.K., Pande, S., Podile, A.R., 2005. Phylloplane bacteria increase seedlingemergence growth and yield of field-grown groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.).Letters in Applied Microbiology 40, 260–268.

Kremer, R.J., Peterson, H.L., 1983. Field evaluation of selected Rhizobium in animproved legume inoculant. Agronomy Journal 75, 139–143.

Kyei-Boahen, S., Slinkard, A.E., Walley, F.L., 2002. Evaluation of rhizobial inoculationmethods for chickpea. Agronomy Journal 94, 851–859.

Lupyawi, N.Z., Olsen, P.E., Sande, E.S., Keyser, H.H., Collins, M.M., Singleton, P.W.,Rice, W.A., 2000. Inoculant quality and its evaluation. Field Crops Research 65,259–270.

Marshall, K.C., 1964. Survival of root-nodule bacteria in dry soils exposed to hightemperatures. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 15, 273–281.

Mary, P., Dupuy, N., Dolhem-Biremon, C., Defives, C., Tailliez, R., 1994. Differencesamong Rhizobium meliloti and Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains in tolerance todesiccation and storage at different relative humidities. Soil Biology andBiochemistry 26, 1125–1132.

Materon, L.A., Weaver, R.W., 1985. Inoculant maturity influences survival of rhizobiaon seed. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 49, 465–467.

Maurice, S., Beauclair, P., Giraud, J.J., Sommer, G., Hartmann, A., Catroux, G., 2001.Survival and change in physiological state of Bradyrhizobium japonicum insoybean (Glycine max L. Merril) liquid inoculants after long-term storage. WorldJournal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 17, 635–643.

Okon, Y., Labandera-Gonzalez, C.A., 1994. Agronomic applications of Azospirillum:an evaluation of 20 years worldwide field inoculation. Soil Biology andBiochemistry 26, 1591–1601.

van Overbeek, L.S., Eberl, L., Givskov, M., Molin, S., van Elsas, J.D., 1995. Survival of,and induced stress resistance in, carbon-starved Pseudomonas fluorescens cellsresiding in soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61, 4202–4208.

Presenti-Barili, B., Ferdani, E., Mosti, M., Degli-Innocent, F., 1991. Survival of Agro-bacterium radiobacter K84 on various carriers for crown gall control. Appliedand Environmental Microbiology 57, 2047–2051.

Rice, W.A., Clayton, G.W., Olsen, P.E., Lupwayi, N.Z., 2000. Inoculant formulationsand soil pH influence pea nodulation and nitrogen fixation. Canadian Journal ofSoil Science 80, 395–400.

Rodrıguez-Navarro, D.N., Temprano, F., Orive, R., 1991. Survival of Rhizobium sp.(Hedysarum coronarium) on peat-based inoculants and inoculated seeds. SoilBiology and Biochemistry 23, 375–379.

Rodrıguez-Navarro, D.N., Ruiz-Sainz, J.E., Buendıa-Claverıa, A.M., Santamarıa, C.,Balatti, P.A., Krishnan, H.B., Pueppke, S.G., 1996. Characterization of fast-growing rhizobia from nodulated soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in Vietnam.Systematic and Applied Microbiology 19, 240–248.




1034

1035

1036

1037

1038

1039

1040

1041

1042

1043

1044

1045

1046

1047

1048

1049

1050

1051

1052

1053

1054

1055

1056

1057

1058

1059

1060

1061

1062

1063

1064

1065

1066

1067

1068

1069

1070

1071

1072

1073

1074

1075

1076

Rodrıguez-Navarro, D.N., Buendıa, A.M., Camacho, M., Lucas, M.M., Santamarıa, C.,2000. Characterization of Rhizobium spp. bean isolates from South-West Spain.Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32, 1601–1613.

Rodrıguez-Navarro, D.N., Bellogın, R., Camacho, M., Daza, A., Medina, C., Ollero, F.J.,Santamarıa, C., Ruiz-Sainz, J.E., Vinardell, J.M., Temprano, F.J., 2003. Fieldassessment and genetic stability of Sinorhizobium fredii strain SMH12 forcommercial soybean inoculants. European Journal of Agronomy 19, 301–311.

Ronchi, A.L., Grassano, A., Balatti, A.P., 1997. Perlite as a carrier for legume inocu-lants. Agrochimica 41, 186–195.

Roughley, R.J., 1970. The preparation and use of legume seed inoculants. Plant andSoil 32, 675–701.

Ruiz-Argueso, T., Santamarıa, J., Labandera, C.A., Orive, R., 1979. Crecimiento ysobrevivencia de Rhizobium japonicum (CB-1809) y Rhizobium trifolii (WU-290)en turbas espanolas de diferentes orıgenes. Anales del INIA/Serie ProduccionVegetal 11, 127–137.

Sadowsky, M.J., Bohlool, B.B., Keyser, H.H., 1987. Serological relatedness of Rhizo-bium fredii to other rhizobia and to the bradyrhizobia. Applied and Environ-mental Microbiology 53, 1785–1789.

Singleton, P., Keyser, H., Sande, E., 2002. Development and evaluation of liquidinoculants. In: Herridge, D. (Ed.), Inoculants and Nitrogen Fixation of Legumesin Vietnam. ACIAR Proceedings 109e, pp. 52–66.

Sparrow, S.D., Ham, G.E., 1983. Survival of Rhizobium phaseoli in six carriers mate-rials. Agronomy Journal 75, 181–184.

Stephens, J.H.G., Rask, H.M., 2000. Inoculant production and formulation. FieldCrops Research 65, 249–258.

Stowers, M.D., Eaglesham, A.R.J., 1984. Physiological and symbiotic characteristics offast-growing Rhizobium japonicum. Plant and Soil 77, 3–14.

UNCORRECTE


OOF

Temprano, F.J., Albareda, M., Camacho, M., Daza, A., Santamarıa, C., Rodrıguez-Navarro, D.N., 2002. Survival of several Rhizobium/Bradyrhizobium strains ondifferent inoculant formulations and inoculated seeds. International Microbi-ology 5, 81–86.

Thao, T.Y., Singleton, P.W., Herridge, D., 2002. Inoculation responses of soybean andliquid inoculants as an alternative to peat-based inoculants. In: Herridge, D.(Ed.), Inoculants and Nitrogen Fixation of Legumes in Vietnam. ACIARProceedings 109e, pp. 67–74.

Thompson, J.A., 1980. Production and quality control of legume inoculants. In:Bergersen, F.J. (Ed.), Methods for Evaluating Biological Nitrogen Fixation. Wiley,New York, pp. 489–533.

Thorne, S.H., Williams, H.D., 1997. Adaptation to nutrient starvation in Rhizobiumleguminosarum bv. phaseoli: analysis of survival, stress resistance, and changesin macromolecular synthesis during entry to and exit from stationary phase.Journal of Bacteriology 179, 6894–6901.

Tittabutr, P., Payakapong, W., Teaumroong, N., Singleton, P.W., Boonkerd, N., 2007.Growth, survival and field performance of bradyrhizobial liquid inoculantformulations with polymeric additives. ScienceAsia 33, 69–77.

Videira, L.B., Pastor, M.D., Lorda, G., Iriarte, L., Balatti, P.A., 2002. Sinorhizobium frediicultured in media supplemented with Amaranthus cruentus L. seed meal andbacterial cell survival in liquid and peat based inoculum. World Journal ofMicrobiology and Biotechnology 18, 193–199.

Vidhyasekaran, P., Muthamilan, M., 1995. Development of formulations ofPseudomonas fluorescens for control of chickpea wilt. Plant Disease 79,782–786.

Vincent, J.M., 1970. A Manual for the Practical Study of the Root-Nodule Bacteria.Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 164 pp.

DPR


1077

alternatives to peat as a carrier for rhizobia inoculants

Documents