aiesec indonesia |1314| talent management november analysis

10
November Talent Management Review AIESEC INDONESIA

Upload: christina-kelman

Post on 17-Dec-2014

324 views

Category:

Education


1 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: AIESEC Indonesia |1314| Talent Management November Analysis

November Talent Management ReviewAIESEC INDONESIA

Page 2: AIESEC Indonesia |1314| Talent Management November Analysis

0

25

50

75

100

UNHAS Surabaya UB UA UMM PMBS UGM UNDIP Binus UPN Bandung UNILA UNSRI UI UNS PU

80

91

66

90

24

100

73 74.8

95.8

8894

77.7

42

100 100

56

LC Retention Rate Quarter 1/Quarter 2

Comments:

1. From Quarter 1 to Quarter 2, retention rate should be high (+90%) as the major recruitment has already passed.

Average Retention Rate: 78%

Type of LC Recommendation

LC’s with retention rate 60% - 90%

1. Take action to understand why retention rate was not as high as predicted. 2. Conduct Exit Interviews3. Based on output schedule chat with MC VPTM to understand future action steps.LC’s with retention rate

0% - 60%1. Conduct specialized exit interviews to understand what went wrong2. Conduct recruitment/ head hunting to fill the available position ASAP.

LCs with Planned <Actuals. (PMBS)

1. What do you need to improve about your talent planning process to ensure you are recruiting the right people.

Page 3: AIESEC Indonesia |1314| Talent Management November Analysis

Recruitment

0

37.5

75

112.5

150

UNHAS Surabaya UB UA UMM PMBS UGM UNDIP Binus UPN Bandung UNS PU

31

83 80

60 64

4152

9078

61

0

34 29

50

110

6066 65

36

52

90

144

60

0

70

43

Planned Recruits Actual Recruits

Comments:

1. Mosts LCs matched Planned vs. Actuals for recruitment for TMP.2. Massive diversity in number of applications - not correlated with diversity of recruits.

2%120

36

1323

488 119530

441

700

149

70

UNHAS SurabayaUB UAUMM PMBSUGM UNDIPBinus UPNBandung PU

Number of Applications

Planned vs. Actual Recruits

Type of LC Recommendation

LC’s with + 400 applications (UB UA, UMM, UGM, UNDIP)

1. Share GCPs with the network2. What is your conversion from rejected candidates for TMP to applications for GCDP/GIP

LCs with with Planned > Actuals (UNHAS, Surabaya, UA, Binus, UNS)

1. What is your action step to fill in the planned positions and roles.

LCs with Planned <Actuals. (PMBS)

1. What do you need to improve about your talent planning process to ensure you are recruiting the right people.

Page 4: AIESEC Indonesia |1314| Talent Management November Analysis

Length of Recruitment

0

37.5

75

112.5

150

UNHAS Surabaya UB UA UMM PMBS UGM UNDIP Binus UPN Bandung UNILA UNSRI UI UNS PU

20

60

0

3030

0

90

150

120

6060

91

150

3025

90

Days

Comments:

1. Good recruitment length is 30 - 45 days.

Type of LC Recommendation

LC’s with 0 - 45 days recruitment 1. Share GCPs with network

LCs with > 45 days recruitment 1. Understand why did recruitment last so long?2.. What can be simplified from the process to ensure the next recruitment is not so long.

Page 5: AIESEC Indonesia |1314| Talent Management November Analysis

Learning and Development

0

25

50

75

100

UNHAS Surabaya UB UA UMM PMBS UGM UNDIP Binus UPN Bandung UNS PU

1 1 2 12 2 0 2 8 0 0 9 0 0

2

3530

0

95

0

43 40

0 0 0 0 0

Average Attendance at Trainings Number of Trainings

Comments:

The minimum standard for

education and training days is once per month. Most LCs have failed to achieve the minimum to date

(5).

Type of LC Recommendation

LC’s with 0 -5 training days 1. Finalize Local Education Cycles2. Implement implement implement!

LCs with 5 - 12 training days 1. Collect feedback to understand why attendance rate is low.2. Either edit timeline, content or delivery to ensure your training events are + 80% attendance.

LC’s with < 80% attendance rate1. Collect feedback from the LC per function/stage of TMP/TLP to understand what the problems are associated with learning and development2. Take action dependent on issues (content/delivery/timeline)

Page 6: AIESEC Indonesia |1314| Talent Management November Analysis

Learning and Development

0

22.5

45

67.5

90

UNHAS Surabaya UB UA UMM PMBS UGM UNDIP Binus UPN Bandung UNSRI UNILA UI UNS0

8077.6

0

87.790

00

60

00

80

70

0

70.5

Average Satisfaction with L&D

Comments:

6 LCs do not have data for learning and

development satisfaction rate

Type of LC Recommendation

LC’s with no data 1. Create a feedback tool for L&D days, collect and record.

Page 7: AIESEC Indonesia |1314| Talent Management November Analysis

0

25

50

75

100

UNHAS Surabaya UB UA UMM PMBS UGM UNDIP Binus UPN Bandung UNSRI UNILA UI UNS PU

38

98

66

0

36

30

96100 100

35.7

100

65

0

100 100

67

% of JDs AssignedJob Description Assignment

Comments:

All LCs should be at 100%!

Type of LC Recommendation

LC’s with no data/ 0 1. Consult with MCVPTM about how to implement JDs

LC’s with JD’s assigned 30% - 60% 1. Set personal target to reach 100% JDs assigned by end of Q2. This should be the #1 priority.

Page 8: AIESEC Indonesia |1314| Talent Management November Analysis

0

25

50

75

100

UNHAS Surabaya UB UA UMM PMBS UGM UNDIP Binus UPN Bandung UNILA UNSRI UI UNS PU

1

95.6

78

0 0

100

51

80.5

50

5

84.81

75

100

63.4

85

40

% of Personal Appraisals completedPersonal Appraisals

Comments:100% complete PAs is due January 14.

LC’s from 0 - 50% completion should

start/seek help from MCVPTM

Type of LC Recommendation

LC’s from 0% - 50% 1. Seek L&D from MCVPTM about PA system/Talent Review

Page 9: AIESEC Indonesia |1314| Talent Management November Analysis

Average Member Length

0

75

150

225

300

UNHAS Surabaya UB UA UMM PMBS UGM UNDIP Binus UPN Bandung UNSRI UNILA UI UNS PU

625672

283

40

0

60

100

143

73

276

93

5770

172

0.5

Days

Page 10: AIESEC Indonesia |1314| Talent Management November Analysis

Leadership Ratio

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

UNHAS Surabaya UB UA UMM PMBS UGM UNDIP Binus UPN Bandung UNSRI UNILA UI UNS PU

0.81

0.390.38

1

0.560.61

0.450.430.420.5

0.35

0.78

0.3

0.93

0.28

0.17

Days

Comments:TLP ratio is most LCs

is high. Recommended ratio

is 0.25 - 0.35

Type of LC Recommendation

TLP ratio > 0.35 1. Leadership pipeline is not sustainable there will be difficulties with applicants for leadership roles2. Revise structure during re-planning

TLP ratio < 0.35 1. Once operations increase over + 20 exchange, there will be difficulties in management of operations2. Revise structure during re-planning