AIESEC Indonesia |1314| Talent Management December Analysis

Download AIESEC Indonesia |1314| Talent Management December Analysis

Post on 02-Nov-2014

779 views

Category:

Business

3 download

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

<ul><li> 1. December Talent Management Review AIESEC INDONESIA </li> <li> 2. LC Monthly Retention Rate November December 1 1 0.94 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 UI UNS PU 0.78 0.75 0.67 0.6 0.5 0.25 0 0 UNHAS Surabaya UB 0 UA UMM 0 PMBS UGM Type of LC Comments: Average Retention Rate: 92% 4 entities recorded a retention rate less than 100%, however no-one conducted exit interviews. UNDIP Binus UPN Bandung UNILA UNSRI Recommendation 1. Take action to understand why retention rate was not as high as predicted. LCs with 2. Conduct Specialized Exit Interviews to retention understand what went wrong. rate 60% - 3. Conduct recruitment/head hunting to ll the 99% available positions ASAP. 4. If you are in this category, please schedule a chat with MCVPTM to understand exit interview process (www.christinakelman.youcanbook.me) LCs with Great Job! retention See what you did month that improved from last rate = month and replicate success! 100% Health Level 1 2 </li> <li> 3. TEAM MEMBER PROGRAM NPS 1194 RECOMMENDATIONS team member program 32% experiences 16% response rate 68% NPS 54 If your Local Committee has not been trained your TMP on NPS, do so asap to increase your Local Response Rate. Number of TMP trained in NPS Number of TMP not trained in NPS Health Level 2 TEAM LEADER PROGRAM NPS 463 team leader program 33% experiences 18% response rate NPS 50 67% Number of TLP trained in NPS Number of TLP not trained in NPS 1 Didnt teach LC about NPS Taught LC about NPS RECOMMENDATIONS If your Local Committee has not been trained your TLP on NPS, do so asap to increase your Local Response Rate. </li> <li> 4. Learning and Development Leadership Ratio: 0.59 9 Number of Applicants per Leadership Role Leadership Ratio: 0.41 9 6.75 Leadership Ratio: 0.45 Leadership Ratio: 1.0 4.5 4 4 3 2.25 2 0 Number of Trainings 2 2 1 1 UNHAS Surabaya 0 0 UB 0 0 UA 2 1 UMM 0 0 PMBS 0 0 UGM 2 2 1 1 1 UNDIP Binus 0 UPN 2 2 Bandung UNS 0 PU 1 UI 0 UNILA Why are some of the trainings high, but number of applications low? This is due to poor leadership ratio. See pg.6 for suggestions. Type of LC Comments: There are still 5 LCs who have not planned or delivered trainings for January. Recommendation Health Level 1. Finalize Local Education Cycles LCs with 0 -5 2. Implement implement implement! training days 3. Consult VPTM with your LEC to see how it can be improved 1 LCs with 5 12 training days 2 Keep up the good work! </li> <li> 5. Number of Members November December 300 225 195 150 143 150 102 75 70 139 94 71 65 70 56 50 57 36 23 20 0 UNHAS Surabaya UB UA UMM PMBS UGM UNDIP Binus UPN Bandung UNSRI UNILA UI UNS PU </li> <li> 6. Leadership Ratio Days 1 1 0.75 0.77 0.67 0.59 0.5 0.25 0 0.3 0.29 0.22 UNHAS Surabaya 0.34 UA UMM 0 Type of LC Comments: TLP ratio in most LCs is still high. Recommended ratio is 0.25 - 0.35 TLP ratio higher than 0.35 (UGM, BINUS, BANDUNG, UNILA, PU, UNS) PMBS UGM UNDIP 0.35 0.27 0.2 UB 0 0.45 0.41 Binus UPN Bandung UNSRI 0 UNILA UI UNS PU Recommendation Health Level 1. Leadership pipeline is not sustainable there will be difculties with applicants for leadership roles 2. Revise structure during re-planning, look at TMP TLP Driving GCDP and GIP Output. 3. Please note that TLPs cannot have less than 3 members. 1 </li> <li> 7. Member Efciency 3 2.7 Current Member Eciency Predicted Member Eciency 2.25 1.97 1.67 1.5 1.5 1.2 1.02 1.85 0.73 0.75 0 1.05 1.24 0.33 0.12 UNHAS Surabaya 0.65 0.58 0 0 UB 0 UA 0 UMM 0.19 0 PMBS 0.97 0.620.23 0.68 UGM UNDIP Binus 0.04 UPN 0 Bandung 0 UNSRI 0.65 0.05 UNILA 0 UI 0.41 UNS Health Level 1</li></ul>