agilent corporation and aerospace and defense directions
TRANSCRIPT
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
To revolutionize the way people live and work through technology
Agilent’s Purpose
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Agilent’s Fields of Focus
Electronics
Communications
Life Sciences andChemical Analysis
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Agilent’s Organization
Test & Measurement
President and CEOEdward W. (Ned) Barnholt
Electronic Productsand Solutions
Byron J. Anderson
Automated TestJohn Scruggs
CommunicationsSolutions
Thomas (Tom) White
SemiconductorProducts
Dick M. Chang
Life Sciences and Chemical Analysis
Chris van IngenGeneral CounselD. Craig Nordlund
CFOAdrian T. Dillon
HRJean M. Halloran
Corporate RelationsWilliam R. (Bill) Hahn
CTOThomas A. (Tom) Saponas
COOWilliam P. (Bill) Sullivan
Sales, Mktg. &Customer SupportLarry C. Holmberg
Agilent Laboratories
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
EPSG Aerospace and Defense
Marsh Faber - Messaging
Mike Granieri – U.S.
Guy Harris - Satellite
Bob Smallwood- Europe
Bill Smith- Surveillance
Orion Wood – Japan/Asia
Carl SmolkaAerospace/Defense Manager
Lynne Camp, V.P.
Outbound/Channel Manager
Mike Gasparian, V.P. & G.M.Multi Industries Business Unit
Byron Anderson, S.V.P. & G.M.Electronic Products and Solutions Group
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Agilent Around the World
Customers in more than 120 countries
More than half of revenue generated outside U.S.
Global manufacturing and R&D
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Innovation and contributionTrust, respect and teamworkUncompromising integritySpeedFocusAccountability
Agilent’s Values
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Business Segments as a Percentage of FY01 Net Revenue*
100% = $8.4 billion
SemiconductorProductsTest and
Measurement
Life Sciences and Chemical Analysis
13%
22%65%
*See note 2
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Agilent’s Road to Independence
March 2, 1999HP announces creation of two independent companies
July 28, 1999Agilent’s name is introduced
November 18, 1999Agilent’s IPO takes place
June 2, 2000Agilent becomes fully independent
November 1, 1999Agilent starts operating as an independent company
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Agilent’s History
Agilent dates back to the earliest days of Hewlett-Packard, which started as a test and measurement company in 1939
Agilent embodies historical commitment to innovation and contribution, uncompromising integrity, teamwork, trust and respect for the individual
Agilent’s headquarters is erected on the site of the first HP headquarters.
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Innovation and contributionTrust, respect and teamworkUncompromising integritySpeedFocusAccountability
Agilent’s Values
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Agilent’s Core TechnologiesCommunications/ElectronicsLife Sciences/Chemical Analysis
Agilent Laboratories
Measurement science Electronic circuit and systems design Fiber Optic and Optoelectronic devices and systems Applications software and solutions integration
Radio frequency/microwave Optics/photonics High-speed optoelectronics High-speed electronics Solid-state materials/devices Communication protocols Network monitoring/mgt.
Chemical separation/analysis Molecular biology Microfluidics
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
The Aerospace/Defense Industry Sectors
Space
Air
Land
Sea
NavCommsScience Intell NavCommsRadar ECMBcast
Commercial SatelliteCommercial Satellite
Ncast
EWOtherAgenciesSurv Recon
Aerospace/Defense Aerospace/Defense
Commercial Aerospace Gov National Defense
Military Satellite Military Satellite
Commercial Aviation
Commercial Aviation
Su
rveilla
nce
Su
rveilla
nce
Defense Electronics
Defense Electronics
Scie
nce &
Tech
nolo
gy
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Worldwide Defense Spending Distribution
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
275
300
Un
ited
Sta
tes
PR
C
Ru
ssia
Fra
nce
Jap
an
Un
ited
Kin
gd
om
Germ
an
y
Italy
Sau
di A
rab
ia
S.
Kore
a
Bra
zil
Taiw
an
Ind
ia
Isra
el
Au
str
alia
139 O
thers
Total for 154 Nations:$ 922 B in $FY ‘01
Source: “World Military Expenditures and Arms Transfers 1998”, dated January 2000
US = 32%$301B in
FY’01
Western Europe
Japan – Asia/Pacific
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
AD Industry Money FlowDefenseAgencies
“Platform”
Providers
Sub-system
Providers
Assembly Providers
Component
Providers
Subs Primes Government
Commodities
Test & Measurement Equipment ManufacturersTest & Measurement Equipment Manufacturers
DefenseSpending
Platform Spendin
g
Defense Electronic
s
Assemblies
Components
All T&M Channels
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
US Consolidation through 1998
General Dynamics
LockheedMartinSpace
Systems Loral
Northrop Grumman
Boeing
TRW
Raytheon
Hughes Space
Honeywell
Through 1998 1998 – 1999 “Additions”Bath Iron WorksGeneral DynamicsGE AerospaceMartin MariettaLockheedLoralLTVGrummanNorthropWestinghouseBoeingRockwellMcDonnell DouglasMagnavoxHughesE-SystemsRaytheonTexas InstrumentsTRWBDMAllied SignalHoneywell
Computer DevicesGTE Government SystemsNational Steel and ShipGulfstream
COMSAT
Satellite Network SystemsSpectrum Satellite
California MicrowaveInt’l Research Inst.Teledyne Ryan
USSBCPrimestar
Allied Signal CommunicationsAustralia Technical Services
Lucas Aerospace
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Source: DFI International
Saab/CelsiusSaab/
Celsius
RheinmetallRheinmetall
EADSEADS
DassaultAviationDassaultAviation
FinnmeccanicaFinnmeccanica
MilitaryAircraft
JointVenture
DassaultOwns 6%
RacalRacal
The European Situation – Complex and Dynamic
EADSOwns 4%
EADSOwns 4% EADS
Owns 47%EADS
Owns 47%
BAESystems
BAESystems
BAEOwns 35%
BAEOwns 35%
STNAtlasSTNAtlas
ThomsonMarconi Sonar
ThomsonMarconi Sonar
Alenia MarconiSystems
Alenia MarconiSystems
AstriumEurofighter
AstriumEurofighter
New MBDAirbus
Industrie
New MBDAirbus
Industrie
Thales
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Industry Attributes
Reliability perspective
MTBF often measured in hours; Failures place lives in jeopardy and impact READINESS
Test and evaluation vitalNeed to be on leading edge of diagnostic technologies
Security & Interoperability“Paradox”
Security places lives in jeopardySelective interoperability critical to effective coalition operations
Clearances often required; software configurability and interoperability testing criticalIndustry Use
ModelsAll of the “normal” in food chain +2/3 of end user lifecycle cost in O&M phase
Contractors look like high tech manufacturers; End user focused on ATE and O&M
Attribute State and Trend Business ImplicationsIndustry “Cycle Time”
Slow (3-4 X other high tech)15 Year Development Cycles> 30 Year Operational Life
Long support life Forward/backward compatibility Looking for “reliable” partners
Industry Volume and Complexity
Low volume (fly prototype)Extreme complexity (Aircraft cost is > 50% electronics)
Manufacturing looks like R&D –No One-box specialization
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Defense Electronics Equipment – History + Forecast
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Western Europe
Japan – A/P
Former USSR
Cold War Scenario
World PeaceScenario
Rogues & Terrorists Scenario
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
US Consolidation through 1998
General Dynamics
LockheedMartinSpace
Systems Loral
Northrop Grumman
Boeing
TRW
Raytheon
Hughes Space
Honeywell
Through 1998 1998 – 1999 “Additions”Bath Iron WorksGeneral DynamicsGE AerospaceMartin MariettaLockheedLoralLTVGrummanNorthropWestinghouseBoeingRockwellMcDonnell DouglasMagnavoxHughesE-SystemsRaytheonTexas InstrumentsTRWBDMAllied SignalHoneywell
Computer DevicesGTE Government SystemsNational Steel and ShipGulfstream
COMSAT
Satellite Network SystemsSpectrum Satellite
California MicrowaveInt’l Research Inst.Teledyne Ryan
USSBCPrimestar
Allied Signal CommunicationsAustralia Technical Services
Lucas Aerospace
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Source: DFI International
Saab/CelsiusSaab/
Celsius
RheinmetallRheinmetall
EADSEADS
DassaultAviationDassaultAviation
FinnmeccanicaFinnmeccanica
MilitaryAircraft
JointVenture
DassaultOwns 6%
RacalRacal
The European Situation – Complex and Dynamic
EADSOwns 4%
EADSOwns 4% EADS
Owns 47%EADS
Owns 47%
BAESystems
BAESystems
BAEOwns 35%
BAEOwns 35%
STNAtlasSTNAtlas
ThomsonMarconi Sonar
ThomsonMarconi Sonar
Alenia MarconiSystems
Alenia MarconiSystems
AstriumEurofighter
AstriumEurofighter
New MBDAirbus
Industrie
New MBDAirbus
Industrie
Thales
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Defense Electronics and Defense Platforms Aircraft
Includes UAV’s and Helicopters
Ships Primary Shipboard
EquipmentVehicles
Wheeled and Tracked Terrestrial Platforms
Space Lift, Payloads And
Supporting InfrastructureLow Mobility
Electronic /IT/ SW Systems not platform specific
MissilesOrdnance / Weapons
Radar Search, Detection and
TrackingElectronic
Countermeasures Detection and Deception
Communications Voice and Data
Surveillance & Reconnaissance
Identification and LocationNavigation and
Guidance GPS and Landing Systems
Control and Computation
Control, Displays, Processors
WeaponsAmmunition and Armor
PropulsionEngines, Fuel, Drive Train, Suspension
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Aerospace/Defense ExampleDefenseAgencies
“Platform”
Providers
Sub-system
Providers
Assembly Providers
Component
Providers
Subs Primes Government
Commodities
Fighter Fighter Air Forc
e
Air Forc
e
Radar Radar
EnginesEngines
Airframe Airframe
EW systemEW system
Navigation &Guidance
Navigation &Guidance
LOs and exciters
•Processors •Power Supplies •Power Converters•A/D, D/A Converters•Antennas
•Processors •Power Supplies •Power Converters•A/D, D/A Converters•Antennas
Test & Measurement Equipment ManufacturersTest & Measurement Equipment Manufacturers
T&M ChannelsT&M Channels
MMICs•Power Transistors•Circulators •Interconnect / Substrates•Optoelectro Amplifiers•SAW Devices•ASICs•Oscillators•Phase Shifters
•Power Transistors•Circulators •Interconnect / Substrates•Optoelectro Amplifiers•SAW Devices•ASICs•Oscillators•Phase Shifters
CommsComms
Reconn & Surveillance
Transmitter/ Receivers
Mod/demodSignal
Processing
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
AD Industry Value Delivery System
DefenseAgencies
“Platform”
Providers
Sub-system
Providers
Assembly Providers
Component
Providers
Subs Primes Government
Commodities
Test & Measurement Equipment ManufacturersTest & Measurement Equipment Manufacturers
T&M ChannelsT&M Channels
•Processors •Power Supplies •Power Converters•A/D, D/A Converters•Antennas
•Processors •Power Supplies •Power Converters•A/D, D/A Converters•Antennas
•Power Transistors•Circulators Interconn/ Substrates•OE Amplifiers•SAW Devices•ASICs•Oscillators•Phase Shifters
•Power Transistors•Circulators Interconn/ Substrates•OE Amplifiers•SAW Devices•ASICs•Oscillators•Phase Shifters
Lockheed Martin
RaytheonITT Industries
Northrop Grumman
LittonTRW
L-3 CommsGeneral
DynamicsDaimlerChrysler
BAE SystemsThales
Lockheed MartinRaytheonBoeingBAE SystemsEADSThales
ArmyNavyAir Force
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
AD Industry Test And Measurement Perspective Defense
Agencies“Platform
” Providers
Sub-system
Providers
Assembly Providers
Component
Providers
Subs Primes Government
Commodities
Test & Measurement Equipment ManufacturersTest & Measurement Equipment Manufacturers
T&M ChannelsT&M Channels
G.P. Instruments
Application Specific Instruments
“SIMPLE” Parametric and
Functional Test Systems” En
vir
on
me
nt
An
aly
sis
&
Sim
ula
tio
n
“COMPLEX” Parametric & Functional Test Systems
IntegratedMaintenance
Portable
ATE/ATS
Bench Rep & Cal
(GPTE)
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Key Forces, Trends and Implications
Reliability
Complexity
Longevity
Branch Centric
Firepower
Readiness
Reliability
Complexity
Longevity
Network-Centric
Precision Force
Affordability
People die when
systems fail
15 year developments30 + year life-cycles
System of Electronic systems
Joint OperationsCoalitions &
Information Warfare(Sensor to Shooter)
“Cold War” ScenarioTo “World Peace”
To Rogues & Terrorists
Manual repair & calibration moving to ATS & integrated diagnostics
Signal/systemsimulation and analysis functionality & performance
Seamless product migration plans
Reduced test costs over all elements of system life-cycle
From To T&M Implication Driver
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Defense Electronics – Key Technology TrendsRadar
EW
CommsTac
Nav/Guide
Surveillance
Sat
ATS/ATE
Bench Rep/Cal
Single T/RSingle mode
Conformal digital Fully integrated
Phased Array (AESA)Multiple modes
Specific Function
Multimode Fully Integrated
Single Signal Type(“hardwired”)
Multiple Signal Types(reconfigurable)GPS infrastructure
upgrades
Per sub-system testers
Per service comprehensive ATS
Joint synthetic instrument ATS
Wide variety of test equipment
Few, highly capable instruments
Low BW analog
High BW secure digitalAnalog Radio Digital radio Software-Defined radio
‘80s and ‘90s Today Future
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Radar Performance Evolution
Fixed channel analog receiver
Simple waveform set
Low noise RF Standard A/D
and D/A conversion
Fixed multi-channel analog receiver
Complex waveform set
Very low noise RF High speed large
dynamic range A/D and D/A conversion
Variable channel digital receiver
Direct digital synthesis waveforms
Extremely low noise RF
Module level high speed A/D & D/A conversion
PastMechanically Steered
Antenna (MSA)
CurrentActive Electronically
Steered Antenna (AESA)
FutureDigital Radar
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
EW Performance Evolution
Single mode and single function
Dedicated “aperture”
Little attention to power management
Focus on detection
Loose integration
Mode switching
Focus on power management
Focus on friend or foe determination
Fully integrated system
Multiple modes
Shared “apertures”
Focus on identification and discrimination
PastSingle Function
CurrentMultifunction
FutureFully Integrated
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Tactical Radio EvolutionPast
Analog RadioCurrent
Digital radioFuture
Software Defined radio
Analog (voice) traffic
Designed in interoperability (stovepipe)
Point-to-Point
Analog and Digital traffic (voice/data)
Limited interoperability
Some network client capability
Multimedia traffic (voice/data/video)
Software defined security and interoperability
Full network participant
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Signal Monitoring/Intelligence Evolution
PastAnalog Channels
CurrentAnalog & Digital Channels
FutureSoftware Defined Channels
Unique “hardwired” configuration per signal type
Custom “Rack and Stack” receivers
Analog signal processing
Software configurable signal types
Wider bandwidth down conversions
More sophisticated digital signal processing
Unique “Firmware” configuration per signal type
Analog block down conversion
Digital signal processing
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Military Communications Satellite EvolutionPast
Analog “Bent Pipe”Current
Digital TransparentFuture
Digital Regenerative
Analog (voice & video) traffic
Analog modulation
Signal amplification in satellite
36 MHz channels
Analog and digital traffic
Vector modulation
Analog signal amplification in satellite
36 MHz channels
Wideband digital traffic
Vector modulation
Digital signal regeneration in satellite
36-72-120 MHz channels
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Automatic Test System EvolutionPast
Per Service and Per Platform ATS
CurrentPer Service but Platform
Common ATS
FutureJoint Service
Common Platform ATS
Unique configuration per system
Primarily “Rack and Stack” instruments
Unique Test Program Sets (TPS) of fixturing, and SW
Focus on “long-life” HW architectures
Hybrid mix of instruments and “modules”
Preserve TPS investment
Focus on more capable HW architectures
Any signal on any pin at any time
Optimize TPS coverage
Aerospace/Defense DirectionsApril 2002
Repair & Calibration Test System EvolutionPast
Hundreds ofMakes/Models
CurrentTens of
Makes/Models
FutureOne Very Capable
Make/Model
Test equipment specified by equipment supplier
Cost plus focus discourages commonality
Test equipment constrained by equipment buyer
Affordability realized by inventory reduction
Test equipment capability a given
Affordability and Readiness maximized
Technology refresh paths enhanced
Multimeters = 100
Oscilloscopes = 250