adolescent girls' attitudes towards learning mathematics with pbl
DESCRIPTION
This powerpoint was used in my presentation during the PME-NA 2013 conference in Chicago in which I shared my dissertation research.TRANSCRIPT
Dismantling the Birdcage
Relational Problem-Based Learning: Adolescent Girls’ Experiences with an Inclusive Pedagogy for Mathematics
Carmel Schettino, Ph.D. - November 2013
-Marilyn Frye, Oppression, in The Politics of Reality (1983)
If you look very closely at just one wire in the cage, you cannot see the other wires…You could look one wire up and down the length of it, and be unable to see why a bird would not just fly around the wire any time it wanted go somewhere…There is no physical property of any one wire…that will reveal how a bird could be inhibited or harmed by it except in the most accidental way. It is only when you step back, stop looking at the wires one by one and take a macroscopic view of the whole cage, that you can see why the bird does not go anywhere; and then you will see it in a moment. It is perfectly obvious that the bird is surrounded by a network of systematically related barriers, no one of which would be the least hindrance to its flight but which by their relations to each other, are as confining as the solid walls of a dungeon. (p.5)
Education Research Statement
Call for change – movement in math education (Boaler, 1994; Fennema, 1985; Freire, 1970).
New forms of instruction- support equity and inclusiveness of underrepresented groups- including girls and women (Mau & Leitze, 2001; Meece & Jones, 1996; Solar, 1995).
discussion and more relationally-based teaching methods researched and recommended (Boaler, 2008; Lubienski, 2007)
Although achievement gap is closing, “interest gap” is
not (higher grades, fewer majors) (Hill, Corbett, & St. Rose, 2010) and continuing dichotomous cultural view of mathematical identity (Mendick, 2008, Riegle-Crumb et al, 2012)
Relational Problem-Based Learning
An approach to curriculum and pedagogy where student learning and content material are (co)-constructed by students and teachers through mostly contextually-based problems in a discussion-based classroom where student voice, experience, and prior knowledge are valued in a non-hierarchical environment utilizing a relational pedagogy.
Research Question
What is the nature of the relationship between girls’ attitudes towards mathematics and their learning of mathematics during and after experiencing it in an RPBL environment? How do they describe their experiences?
Enjoyment Self-confidence Value Empowerment Agency
Theoretical Framework
A Pedagogy of Feminist
Relation
Feminist Mathematics
Pedagogy
Inclusion/No Hierarchy
Voice & Agency
Active Participation
Connection
Relational Pedagogy
Relational Equity & Authority
Relational Trust
Solar (1995), Anderson (2005), Boaler (2008), Rodgers & Raider-Roth (2006), Bingham (2004), Biesta (2004)
Research Design
•Approximately 5 participants, 2 interviews each
•Determine Students’ perceptions of their learning experience in RPBL
Student Interviews
•2-3 Class Observations per Participant
•Determine students' externally observed learning experience and extent to which RPBL is used by teachers
Classroom Observations
•2-3 Individual Teachers, 1 interview each
•Determine teachers’ descriptions of students’ learning experiences
Teacher Interviews
•One Journal per Participant
•Read for additional information about student’s description of their learning experience
Student Journals
Student Participants
Name Leona Isabelle Kacey Sarah Alanna
Grade 10 9 10 9 9
Teacher Schettino Johnson Schettino Brown Schettino
Race White Mixed White White African-
American
SES Upper Middle Middle Upper
Middle Lower
Ability Low Middle Low Middle High
Interest Low Medium High Low Low
Boarder/Day Boarder Boarder Boarder Day Day
Data Analysis
Comparison with Teacher Interview, Journal and class observation Codes
The Listening Guide, Voice-Centered,Narrative Analysis, Gilligan & Brown (1991)
Coding Maps creating and overlapping themes vetted (MaxQDA)
Analyzed each girl on Continuum of Girls’ Learning in RPBL based on Brew, et al (2001)
Sample Overlap Diagram
Continuum of Girls’ Learning
Absolute Dualism
•No voice
•Absolute orientation towards knowledge and truth
•Each piece of knowledge is discrete
Transitional Multiplicity
•Listening to others’ voices/Receptive
•Emerging acceptance of multiple perspectives in areas where knowledge is considered uncertain
•directed awaresness of connected knowledge
Independent Relativism
•Listening to the voice of reason
•Rejection of absolute truth where context plays an important part is assessing knowledge
•independent awaresness of Connected vs. Separate knowledge
Contextual Commitment
•Integration of the two procedural voices
•Perception that meaning-making once expected to come from outside themselves, from authority, emanates from within
•ability to perceive the complexities of interconnectedness of knolwedge
Based on Brew (2001), Belenky (1986), Perry (1970), Baxter Magolda (1992)
Voice Awareness in Learning
Dichotomous Truth in Learning
Connected vs. Separate Knowledge
Narrative Analysis
The Listening Guide – narrative, voice-centered, relational approach
“often coded, indirect language of girls and women” (Beauboef, 2007).
Listening Purpose
First Plot, Story, What is being told, Reader Response
Second I statements coded, I-Poems formed, stories told by them
Third/Fourth Contrapuntal Voices listened for, stories/voices in opposition to other voices heard?
Sarah – Passivity to Agency
I You We
we’d fill in notes
we’d do homework
we still go over the homework
you can really
If you don’t understand
you can definitely ask
I think
in my old class
I was so afraid to ask
all be judging you
Leona – Finding Your Voice
I You We
As you grow
When you turn 18
You have the power
You get to express yourself
No matter what side you’re on
I feel like
I could be on
I like to solve it this way
We both get to express
One of us is wrong
If one of us is right
Or even if both of us is right
Changed my identity
Given me a voice
I didn’t really have one before
Isabelle – Transparency
I You
You’re more in control
You can
You have to participate
You don’t have to
You choose to participate
You want to help
You want to understand
I didn’t understand
I would go up
I could understand
I expected everybody
I have a question
I ask it
I know
You should not do it
You find out the reason why
Then you’re like “OK”
Alanna
Self-Confidence Self-Doubt
I can get it
I wouldn’t comprehend it
I probably would
I want algebra to die
I don’t…
I don’t know
I don’t remember
I would have to do
I could really do
I can’t do those
I can draw
I wouldn’t know
I have those
I wouldn’t know
I just combine
I think
I know the way
I just had to plug
I’ve had practice
I was taught that
I got it
I know the formula
I just put it together
I try not to get confused
I wouldn’t really know
C
o
n
t
r
a
p
u
n
t
a
l
V
o
i
c
e
s
Kacey - Empowerment
I You We
I feel like once
you understand the connection
you actually become smarter
you can make connections
I think that’s the beauty
we learned
I love the problems
we do
you can have one problem
we learned
Relative Growth on Learning Continuum
Sarah Sarah
Leona Leona
Isabelle Isabelle
Alanna Alanna
Kacey Kacey
ABSOLUTE DUALISM
TRANSITIONAL MULTIPLICTY
INDEPENDENT RELATIVISM
CONTEXTUAL COMMITMENT
RPBL Framework
RPBL Framework
Connected Curriculum
Justification not
prescription
Shared Authority
Ownership of
Knowledge
-scaffolded problems -decompartmentalized topics -the connected nature of mathematics
-Focus on the “why” in solutions - foster inquiry with multiple perspectives -value curiosity & assess creativity
Encouragement of individual and group ownership -journals -student presentation, -revoicing and other deliberate discourse moves
Dissolution of authoritarian hierarchy -discourse moves to improve equity -send message of valuing risk-taking and all ideas
Conclusions –Dismantle the Birdcage
Mathematics education research - Looking “one wire up and down”
Common wires - standardized testing bias, test anxiety,
self-efficacy issues
no “physical property” cultural, implicit, relational - girls and women, people of color or students with learning differences
“network of systematic barriers” - the traditional,
dichotomous, gendered and authoritarian mathematics pedagogy
RPBL gave a different experience