aashto method of flexible pavement design

18
Lec 29, Ch.20, pp.990-1007: AASTHO flexible pavement design method (objectives) Know the factors considered in the AASHTO design method Become familiar with use of Tables 20.13a and b through 20.18 and Figures 20.15 through 20.20 Know how the structural numbers are used in thickness determination Become thoroughly familiar with the structural design process of the AASHTO flexible pavement design method

Upload: shuvanjan-dahal

Post on 22-Jan-2016

307 views

Category:

Documents


18 download

DESCRIPTION

AASHTO Method of Flexible Pavement Design

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: AASHTO Method of Flexible Pavement Design

Lec 29, Ch.20, pp.990-1007: AASTHO flexible pavement design method (objectives)

Know the factors considered in the AASHTO design methodBecome familiar with use of Tables 20.13a and b through 20.18 and Figures 20.15 through 20.20Know how the structural numbers are used in thickness determinationBecome thoroughly familiar with the structural design process of the AASHTO flexible pavement design method

Page 2: AASHTO Method of Flexible Pavement Design

What we discuss in class today…

Design considerations

Use of tables and figures related to the factors considered

Structural design procedure

Page 3: AASHTO Method of Flexible Pavement Design

Design considerations for theAASHTO Flexible Pavement Design

Pavement performance

Traffic

Roadbed soils (subgrade material)

Materials of construction

Environment

Drainage

Reliability

The following factors are considered in the pavement thickness design.

Page 4: AASHTO Method of Flexible Pavement Design

Pavement performance

Structural Cracking, faulting, raveling, etc.

Functional Riding comfort (measured in terms of roughness of pavement.)

Serviceability Performance: Measured by PSI Present Serviceability Index with scale 0 to 5.

0 “Road closed”

5 “Just constructed”4.2 Initial PSI (pi)

Terminal PSI (pt)

2.5 to 3.0 for major highways

2.0 for lower class highways

1.5 for very special cases

PSI

Page 5: AASHTO Method of Flexible Pavement Design

Traffic In the AASHTO flexible pavement design, traffic is considered in terms of ESAL for the terminal PSI (Table 20.13 for pt = 2.5.)

You must assume the structural number of the pavement. So, you must check if the final SN3 is similar to the assumed SN. Higher SN means stronger pavement, thus the impact of traffic on pavement deteriorations is less.

Page 6: AASHTO Method of Flexible Pavement Design

Roadbed soils (Subgrade material)

CBR (California Bearing Ratio), R-value (Resistance), and Mr (Resilient modulus) are used to describe the property of the subgrade material.

During the structural design, only Mr values are used. The following conversion formulas are used if either CBR or R-values are given.

Mr (lb/in2) = 1500 x CBR for fine-grain soils with soaked CBR of 10 or less.

Mr (lb/in2) = 1000 + 555 x (R-value) for R <= 20

Page 7: AASHTO Method of Flexible Pavement Design

Materials of construction (Subbase), a3

Charts are available to convert the properties of pavement construction materials to structural numbers: a3, a2, and a1

Structural number of the subbase, a3

Use CBR, R-value, or Mr to find a3 values

Page 8: AASHTO Method of Flexible Pavement Design

Materials of construction (Base course), a2

Base!

Structural number of the base course, a2

Use CBR, R-value, or Mr to find a2 values

Page 9: AASHTO Method of Flexible Pavement Design

Materials of construction (AC surface), a1

= Resilient modulus, Mr

Structural number of the AC surface, a1

0.44

Page 10: AASHTO Method of Flexible Pavement Design

Environment Temperature and rainfall

affect the level of strength of the subgrade, reflected on the value of resilient modulus. AASHTO developed a chart that helps you to estimate the effective roadbed soil resilient modulus using the serviceability criteria (in terms of “relative damage, uf.”)

Determine the average uf. value and obtain Mr from the chart or the equation of uf. . The bar on the right is used twice: Once to read uf value for each month’s sample Mr, then to read annual average Mr using the average uf value.

Step 1

Step 3

Step 2

Page 11: AASHTO Method of Flexible Pavement Design

Drainage

The effect of drainage on the performance of flexible pavements is considered with respect to the effect water has on the strength of the base material and roadbed soil.

This effect is expressed by the drainage coefficient, mi. This value is dependent on the drainage quality and the percent of time pavement structure is exposed to moisture levels approaching saturation.

Page 12: AASHTO Method of Flexible Pavement Design

Definition of drainage quality and finding recommended mi values

Time required to drain the base/subbase layer to 50% saturation.

If “Fair” and 30% exposure, then mi is 0.80.

Step 1

Step 2

Page 13: AASHTO Method of Flexible Pavement Design

Reliability

The reliability factor (FR) is computed using:

The Reliability design level (R%), which determine assurance levels that the pavement section designed using the procedure will survive for its design period (it is a z-score from the standard normal distribution

the standard deviation (So) that accounts for the chance variation in the traffic forecast and the chance variation in actual pavement performance for a given design period traffic, W18.

oRR SZF 10log

SD, So

Flexible pavements

0.40-0.5

Rigid pavements

0.30-0.40

Why do we have a negative sign here? Are ZR values negative? Why not ZRSo! Well the clue is in Eq. 20-13 and the bell curve shown below.

One-sided Z-score is used here.

SurviveFail

Page 14: AASHTO Method of Flexible Pavement Design

Structural design The object of the design using the AASHTO method is to determine a

flexible pavement SN adequate to carry the projected design ESAL.

The method discussed in the text (Example 20-8) applies to ESALs greater than 50,000 for the performance period. The design for ESALs less than this is usually considered under low-volume roads.

07.8log32.2

)1/(109440.0

)5.12.4/(log

20.01log36.9log

10

19.510

101810

r

oR

M

SN

PSI

SNSZW

Simplify this as f(W18) = f(ZRSo) + f(SN)

We will keep the ESAL value constant and try to prove whether ZR must be negative or not. Note that So and SN are always positive. Standard deviation is always positive because it is a physical difference from the mean value, and SN is also positive because it means pavement thickness.

33322211 mDamDaDaSN Where,

Page 15: AASHTO Method of Flexible Pavement Design

Solving the riddle of the negative values of ZR

f(W18) = f(ZRSo) + f(SN)

ESAL is an estimated value. It may actually more or less. In the design formula, however, the ESAL value is set to a constant. Then to make sure the pavement survive, you have to have a thicker one than the thickness that the estimated ESAL requires. To make that happen in the design formula, we need to subtract a value from the RHS. Hence, the reliability factor must be negative. The only way to make ZRSo smaller is to have a negative value of ZR because So is always positive.

Page 16: AASHTO Method of Flexible Pavement Design

How to use Fig. 20.20 to get structural numbers based on Eq. 20.13

This line has nothing to do with Example 20-8.

This line is for the subgrade in Example 20-8. Mr=1500*6=9000

SN3= 4.4

For subbase, Mr=13,500

For base course, Mr=31,000

SN2= 3.8

SN1= 2.6

Page 17: AASHTO Method of Flexible Pavement Design

Once SN value is set, thickness design begins…

33322211 mDamDaDaSN

111 DaSN

222112 mDaDaSN

333222113 mDamDaDaSN

Proceed in this direction

Use Fig.20.15 for a3, Fig.20.16 for a2, Fig.20.17 for a3, and Tab. 20.14 and 20.15 m2 and m3. Find the depth that results in a SN value close to the SN value obtained from Fig. 20.20.

Page 18: AASHTO Method of Flexible Pavement Design

Example 20-8Given:

ESAL = 2 x 106

One week for water to be drained

Saturation level moisture exposure = 30% of the time

AC’s Mr at 68Fo = 450,000 lb/in2

CBR of base course =100, Mr = 31,000 lb/in2

CBR of subbase =22, Mr = 13,500 lb/in2

CBR of subgrade = 6, Mr = 1500CBR= 6*1500 = 9000 lb/in2

Rural interstate

Parameter values:

Reliability level (R ) = 99% from Tab. 20.16

Standard Deviation (So) = 0.49, Table 20.16, p.973

Initial serviceability, pi = 4.5

Terminal serviceability, pt = 2.5

Drainage mi values = 0.8 for “Fair” category in Tab. 20.14 and “Greater than 25%” category in Tab. 20.15