a study on the antecedents and …indianresearchjournals.com/pdf/ijssir/2016/july/4.pdf · tamil...

4
International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research_______________________________ ISSN 2277-3630 IJSSIR, Vol. 5 (7), JULY (2016), pp. 20-27 Online available at indianresearchjournals.com A STUDY ON THE ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF ENGAGEMENT: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK DR. R. KRISHNAVENI*; MS. R.MONICA** *PROFESSOR, PSG INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT, PEELAMEDU, COIMBATORE 641004, TAMIL NADU, INDIA. **RESEARCH SCHOLAR, PSG INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT, PEELAMEDU, COIMBATORE 641004, TAMIL NADU, INDIA. ABSTRACT Employee Engagement (EE) has been depicted as the success story of the emerging talent imperative. Organizations across the globe widely practice engagement to capture the hearts, minds and hands of the employees. Hence EE, when crafted addressing the needs of the employees will result in better outcomes at the team, individual level eventually lead to organizational effectiveness facilitating competitive advantage. As the concept of employee engagement has grown in popularity, it has undergone significant developments in definition, measurement, and conceptualization, This paper consolidates the research activities of EE in three categories namely conceptualization, antecedents and consequences of EE and posit the direction for the need of a dynamic engagement strategy. KEYWORDS: Employee Engagement, Antecedents, Consequences, Discretionary Effort, Intention to quit. VI REFERENCES 1. Simon L. Albrecht (2012)The influence of job, team and organizational level resources on employee well-being, engagement, commitment and extra-role performance. International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 33 No. 7, 2012 pp. 840-853 2. Gagne´, M. and Bhave, D. (2011), “Autonomy in the workplace: an essential ingredient to employee engagement and well-being in every culture”, in Chirkov, V.I., Ryan, R.M. and Sheldon, K.M. (Eds), Human Autonomy in Cross-cultural Context: Perspectives on the Psychology of Agency, Freedom, and Well-being, Springer, New York, NY, pp. 163-187. 3. Burke, R., & El-Kot, G. (2010). Work engagement among managers and professionals in Egypt:Potential antecedents and consequences. Africal Journal of Economic and Management Studies , 1(1), 42-60. 4,Schaufeli, W., & Bakker, A. (2003). Utrecht's Work Engagement Scale. Utrechts' WorkEngagement Scale: Preliminary Manual . Occupational Health Psychology Unit: Utrecht University.

Upload: vantu

Post on 18-May-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A STUDY ON THE ANTECEDENTS AND …indianresearchjournals.com/pdf/IJSSIR/2016/July/4.pdf · TAMIL NADU, INDIA. ABSTRACT ... & Holmes, N. (2006). The meaning of work: The challenge

International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research_______________________________ ISSN 2277-3630 IJSSIR, Vol. 5 (7), JULY (2016), pp. 20-27 Online available at indianresearchjournals.com

A STUDY ON THE ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF

ENGAGEMENT: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

DR. R. KRISHNAVENI*; MS. R.MONICA**

*PROFESSOR,

PSG INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT,

PEELAMEDU, COIMBATORE – 641004,

TAMIL NADU, INDIA.

**RESEARCH SCHOLAR,

PSG INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT,

PEELAMEDU, COIMBATORE – 641004,

TAMIL NADU, INDIA.

ABSTRACT

Employee Engagement (EE) has been depicted as the success story of the emerging talent

imperative. Organizations across the globe widely practice engagement to capture the hearts,

minds and hands of the employees. Hence EE, when crafted addressing the needs of the

employees will result in better outcomes at the team, individual level eventually lead to

organizational effectiveness facilitating competitive advantage. As the concept of employee

engagement has grown in popularity, it has undergone significant developments in definition,

measurement, and conceptualization, This paper consolidates the research activities of EE in

three categories namely conceptualization, antecedents and consequences of EE and posit the

direction for the need of a dynamic engagement strategy.

KEYWORDS: Employee Engagement, Antecedents, Consequences, Discretionary Effort,

Intention to quit.

VI REFERENCES

1. Simon L. Albrecht (2012)The influence of job, team and organizational level resources

on employee well-being, engagement, commitment and extra-role performance. International

Journal of Manpower, Vol. 33 No. 7, 2012 pp. 840-853

2. Gagne´, M. and Bhave, D. (2011), “Autonomy in the workplace: an essential ingredient

to employee engagement and well-being in every culture”, in Chirkov, V.I., Ryan, R.M. and

Sheldon, K.M. (Eds), Human Autonomy in Cross-cultural Context: Perspectives on the

Psychology of Agency, Freedom, and Well-being, Springer, New York, NY, pp. 163-187.

3. Burke, R., & El-Kot, G. (2010). Work engagement among managers and professionals

in Egypt:Potential antecedents and consequences. Africal Journal of Economic and

Management Studies , 1(1), 42-60.

4,Schaufeli, W., & Bakker, A. (2003). Utrecht's Work Engagement Scale. Utrechts'

WorkEngagement Scale: Preliminary Manual . Occupational Health Psychology Unit: Utrecht

University.

Page 2: A STUDY ON THE ANTECEDENTS AND …indianresearchjournals.com/pdf/IJSSIR/2016/July/4.pdf · TAMIL NADU, INDIA. ABSTRACT ... & Holmes, N. (2006). The meaning of work: The challenge

International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research_______________________________ ISSN 2277-3630 IJSSIR, Vol. 5 (7), JULY (2016), pp. 20-27 Online available at indianresearchjournals.com

5.Thiagarajan, B., & Renukadevi, V. (2011). Employee Engagement Practices in Indian BPO

Industries: An Empirical Investigation. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in

Business , 134-142.

6. Albrecht, S., & Andreetta, M. (2011). The influence of empowering

leadership,empowerment and engagement on affective commitment and turnover intentions in

community hearlth service workers: Test of a model. Leadership in Health Services , 24 (3),

228-237.

8. Slatten, T., & Mehmetoglu, M. (2011). Antecedents and effects of engaged frontline

employees:A study from the hospital industry. Managing Service Quality , 88-197.

9. McBain, R. (2007). The practice of engagement research into current employee engagement

practice. Strategic HR Review , 6 (6), 16-19.

10. Cartwright, S., & Holmes, N. (2006). The meaning of work: The challenge of regaining

employee engagement and reducing cynicism. Human Resource Management Review, 16, 199-

208.

11. Vance, R. J. (2006). Employee engagement and commitment: A guide to understanding,

measuring, and increasing engagement in your organization. Alexandria, VA: The SHRM

Foundation.

12. Czarnowsky, M. (2008). Learning‟s role in employee engagement: An ASTD research

Study. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training & Development.

13.Wagner, R., & Harter, J. K. (2006). 12: The great elements of managing. Washington, DC:

The Gallup Organization.

14.Shuck ,Michael B., "Employee Engagement: An Examination of Antecedent and Outcome

Variables" (2010). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 235.

15. Lloyd, R. (2008). Discretionary effort and the performance domain. The Australian and

New Zealand Journal of Organizational Psychology, 1, 22-34.

16. Wefald, A. J., & Downey, R. G. (in press). The construct dimensionality of engagement and

its relationship with satisfaction. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied.

17.Schaufeli,W.B., Taris, T.W. and Van Rhenen,W. (2008), “Workaholism, burnout and

engagement:three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being?”, Applied

Psychology: An International Review, Vol. 57 No. 2, pp. 173-203.

18. Halbesleben, J. (2010), “A meta-analysis of work engagement: relationships with burnout,

demands, resources and consequences”, in Bakker, A.B. and Leiter, M.P. (Eds), Work

Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research, Psychology Press, New York,

NY, pp. 102-17.

Page 3: A STUDY ON THE ANTECEDENTS AND …indianresearchjournals.com/pdf/IJSSIR/2016/July/4.pdf · TAMIL NADU, INDIA. ABSTRACT ... & Holmes, N. (2006). The meaning of work: The challenge

International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research_______________________________ ISSN 2277-3630 IJSSIR, Vol. 5 (7), JULY (2016), pp. 20-27 Online available at indianresearchjournals.com

19. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E. and Schaufeli,W.B. (2009), “Work

engagement and financial returns: a diary study on the role of job and personal resources”,

Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 82 No. 1, pp. 183-200.

20. Robertson, Ivan T., and Cary L. Cooper. "Full engagement: the integration of employee

engagement and psychological well-being." Leadership & Organization Development

Journal 31.4 (2010): 324-336.

21.Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2003). Wellbeing the workplace and its

relationship to business outcomes: A review of the Gallup studies. In C. L. Keyes & J. Haidt

(Eds.), Flourishing: The positive person and the good life (pp. 205-

224). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

22. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their

relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of

Organizational Behavior, 25, 293-315.

23. Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at

the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88,518–528.

24.Lockwood, N. R. (2007). Leveraging employee engagement for a competitive

advantage.Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management.

25. Towers Perrin. (2003). Working today: Understanding what drives employee

engagement. Retrieved from

http://www.towersperrin.com/tp/getwebcachedoc?webc=hrs/usa/2003/200309/tale

nt_2003.pdf

26. Towers Perrin. (2007). Closing the engagement gap: A road map for driving superior

business performance. Retrieved from

http://www.biworldwide.com/info/pdf/Towers_Perrin_Global_Workforce_Study.

Pdf

27. Beck, J. (2003). Independent workforce theory: Implications for HRD. Human Resource

Development International, 6, 21-41.

28. Kahn, W.A. (1990) „Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at

work‟, Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724.

29. Kahn, W. (1992). To be fully there: Psychological presence at work. Human

Relations, 45, 321-349.

30. Determinants of employee engagement and their impact on employee performance Anitha J.

International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 2014 63:3 , 308-323

31. Mary Welch(2011)”The evolution of the employee engagement concept: communication

implications” Corporate Communications: An International Journal Vol. 16 No. 4, 2011 pp.

328-346

Page 4: A STUDY ON THE ANTECEDENTS AND …indianresearchjournals.com/pdf/IJSSIR/2016/July/4.pdf · TAMIL NADU, INDIA. ABSTRACT ... & Holmes, N. (2006). The meaning of work: The challenge

International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research_______________________________ ISSN 2277-3630 IJSSIR, Vol. 5 (7), JULY (2016), pp. 20-27 Online available at indianresearchjournals.com

32. Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of

Managerial Psychology, 21, 600-619.

33. A theoretical model of the antecedents and outcomes of employee engagement : Dubin's

method Sowath Rana , Alexandre Ardichvili , Oleksandr Tkachenko Journal of Workplace

Learning 2014 26:3/4 , 249-266

34. Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial

and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3-30.

35. Czarnowsky, M. (2008). Learning‟s role in employee engagement: An ASTD research

Study. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training & Development.

36. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and

application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

37. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). Good business: Leadership, flow, and the making of

meaning. New York: Viking Penguin.

38. Rich, B. L., LePine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and

effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 617-635.

39. Robinson, D., Perryman, S., & Hayday, S. (2004). The Drivers of Employee Engagement

Report 408. Institute for Employment Studies, UK.

40. David Guest , (2014),"Employee engagement: a sceptical analysis", Journal of

Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, Vol. 1 Iss 2 pp. 141 - 156