a new fixation method for hoffa fracture
TRANSCRIPT
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
A new fixation method for Hoffa fracture
Y. Xu • H. Li • H.-H. Yang
Received: 31 October 2011 / Accepted: 27 October 2012 / Published online: 12 November 2012
� Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the clinical effect of a new fixa-
tion method for Hoffa fractures.
Methods We treated eleven patients with Hoffa fracture
using the new fixation method (fixation with one screw
inserted from the femoral intercondylar notch and two
screws inserted from the nonarticular lateral (or medial)
surface of the fractured condylar fragment; the two sets of
screws were crossed).
Results After an average follow-up period of 24 months
(range 5–28 months), all fractures had healed. The average
healing time was 11.6 weeks (range 9–14 weeks). On the
version of the Knee Society Score modified by Dr. John
Insall in 1993, the average score was 174.6 points (range
125–199 points).
Conclusions The new fixation method for Hoffa fracture
is effective, and may provide a new way to treat Hoffa
fractures.
Keywords Hoffa fracture � Femoral intercondylar notch �Internal fixation � Open reduction
Introduction
Hoffa fractures are intraarticular fractures that are classi-
fied as type 33-B3 fractures by the Orthopaedic Trauma
Association. Most of them need surgical treatment to
achieve a good outcome. Traditional methods of fixation for
Hoffa fractures have resulted in either complex constructs, in
order to achieve stability, or in large articular surface defects
that are created while countersinking lag screws. Both have
negative implications for the patient [1]. We have treated
eleven patients with Hoffa fracture using a new fixation
method. In this novel technique, the fracture is fixed with
three screws: one screw is inserted from the femoral interc-
ondylar notch, and the other two screws are inserted from the
nonarticular lateral (or medial) surface of the fractured
condylar fragment. The two sets of screws are crossed so that
both sides of the fracture lines are completely compressed,
meaning that the fixation is more stable. This method only
damages the articular cartilage in non-weight-bearing
regions, thus decreasing the risk of osteoarthritis.
Patients and methods
From April 2004 to July 2009, we treated eleven fractures in
eleven patients using the new fixation method. There were
nine males and two females aged from 23 to 48 years
(average 37.3 years). Seven fractures were lateral and four
were medial. In all patients, the mechanism of injury was a
motor vehicle accident. According to the Letenneur clas-
sification [2], seven fractures were type I, one was type II,
and three were type III. Preoperative X-rays and MR images
of one of the eleven cases are shown in Figs. 1 and 2.
Surgical technique for the new method
Under general anesthesia with full muscle relaxation, the
patient lies supine with the affected limb exsanguinated
Y. Xu � H. Li � H.-H. Yang (&)
Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated
Hospital of Huzhou Teachers College,
Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang, China
e-mail: [email protected]
Y. Xu
e-mail: [email protected]
123
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg (2013) 39:87–91
DOI 10.1007/s00068-012-0238-2
and supported on a thigh bolster. A standard anterolateral
(or anteromedial) incision with lateral (or medial) parapa-
tellar release and medial (or lateral) dislocation of the
patella allows direct access to the articular aspect of the
fracture. With full flexion of the knee, the fragment is
reduced and fixed preliminarily with two Kirschner wires.
The fracture is fixed with three cancellous screws. One
screw (3.5 mm or 4.5 mm) is inserted from the femoral
intercondylar notch (Figs. 3, 4) and threads through the
fractured condylar fragment. The tip of the screw points
anterolaterally (or anteromedially). The positioning of the
screws for each fracture type is shown in Fig. 5. To
facilitate screw removal when the fracture is healed, the
screw head is not countersunk. The other two screws
(6.5 mm) are inserted from the nonarticular lateral (or
medial) surface of the fractured condylar fragment (Fig. 3),
and are directed medially (or laterally) to thread through
the fracture lines. The tips of the screws reach the opposite
femoral condyle. The two sets of screws are crossed. In
order to obtain sufficient stability, the intercondylar screw
thread must extend beyond the fracture lines by more than
1 cm but must not penetrate the opposite articular cartilage
Fig. 1 Anteroposterior and
lateral radiographs show a
Hoffa fracture of the lateral
femoral condyle
Fig. 2 Coronal and sagittal
plane MRI of the knee clearly
shows a coronal fracture of the
lateral femoral condyle
88 Y. Xu et al.
123
or cortex. The soft tissue elements attached to the fractured
condylar fragment are not stripped off to avoid damaging
the blood supply to the fragment.
Postoperatively, all patients immediately begin to
exercise with no restriction on the range of motion.
Although the initial weight-bearing status is limited, all
patients are allowed full weight-bearing within
three months.
Results
After an average follow-up period of 24 months (range
15–28 months), all of the fractures healed both clinically
and radiologically, without deep infection, delayed union,
nonunion, malunion, osteonecrosis, or hardware removal.
The fracture healing time was 9–14 weeks (average:
11.6 weeks). Based on the version of the Knee Society
Score modified by Dr. John Insall in 1993, the average
score was 174.6 points (Table 1).
Discussion
Coronal fractures of the femoral condyle are rare and were
first described by Hoffa in 1904. A Hoffa fracture is an
unstable intraarticular fracture, so accurate anatomic
reduction and stable fixation are extremely important to
allow early postoperative knee motion and reduce potential
complications. In traditional methods of fracture fixation,
the fracture is fixed with multiple screws using complex
constructs in an attempt to achieve stability, but this is
difficult to achieve. In order to expose and fix the fracture
fragment, the soft tissue elements attached to the fractured
condylar fragment are stripped off such that the blood
supply to the fragment [3] is damaged, which may result in
nonunion or osteonecrosis. The new fixation method
described in the present work uses only three screws. The
soft tissue elements are not stripped, thus maintaining the
blood supply to the fragment, which is helpful for fracture
healing. Countersunk head lag screws create large articular
surface defects and increase the risk of osteoarthritis. The
new fixation method produces only small articular surface
defects on the femoral intercondylar notch, and does not
damage the functional articular surface (such as the
Fig. 3 Anteroposterior and
lateral radiographs show a
fracture that has been fixed with
three screws; one screw was
inserted from the femoral
intercondylar notch
Fig. 4 The screw (arrow) is inserted from the femoral intercondylar
notch
A new fixation method for Hoffa fracture 89
123
articular surface of the patellofemoral joint and the tibio-
femoral joint), so it rarely affects knee function and
decreases the risk of osteoarthritis.
In our opinion, the positioning of the screws depends on
the fracture type and the fracture lines. In Letenneur type I
Hoffa fractures, the entry site for the intercondylar screw is
very close to the site of ACL (anterior cruciate ligament)
insertion, so cruciate functioning could be affected.
Therefore, we believe that it is important to remove the
screws when the fracture is healed. In Letenneur type II
Hoffa fractures, the area of the fracture fragment in the
intercondylar notch must be large enough to allow screw
insertion; otherwise, the screw head may be too near the
weight-bearing area of the articular cartilage and affect
knee function. If necessary, the screw head should be
countersunk. The other two screws are near the posterior of
the femoral condyle and may injure the collateral ligament.
More soft tissue elements are stripped off, such that the
blood supply to the fragment may be damaged, which may
be a disadvantage for fracture healing. We therefor believe
that a posterior approach and countersunk head lag screws
may be a better choice. In Letenneur type III Hoffa frac-
tures, the condylar fragment is big enough to insert an
intercondylar screw. The entry site for the screw is neither
close to the ACL insertion site nor near an area of weight-
bearing articular cartilage. We therefore believe that this
new method is more suited to Letenneur type III Hoffa
fractures.
A biomechanical study designed by Friedman et al. [4]
showed that the crossed screw technique is more rigid than
the parallel screw technique, especially in relation to
resisting torsional stresses. In our new fixation method, the
screws are crossed, which enhances stabilization.
Becker et al. [5] performed a cadaveric study in which
the stiffnesses and loads to failure were compared among
3.5 mm cortical lag screws, 4.5 mm cortical lag screws,
and 6.5 mm cancellous screws that were used to fix
experimentally created Hoffa fractures. There was no dif-
ference in stiffness between any of the groups, but the load
to failure was significantly higher for 6.5 mm screws than
Fig. 5 The positioning of the
screws in each Letenneur
fracture type
Table 1 Information and results for eleven patients
Case Sex Age
(years)
Lateral or
medial
Type Results
Fracture healing time
(weeks)
Objective score
(points)
Functional score
(points)
Total score
(points)
1 F 36 Lateral I 9 76 80 156
2 M 48 Medial I 11 88 100 188
3 M 27 Lateral I 11 99 100 199
4 M 42 Lateral I 14 95 90 185
5 M 32 Medial III 10 88 90 178
6 M 46 Lateral III 12 65 60 125
7 M 23 Lateral I 12 94 100 194
8 M 40 Lateral III 11 90 90 180
9 F 42 Medial II 14 86 80 166
10 M 29 Medial I 13 90 90 180
11 M 45 Lateral I 11 89 80 169
90 Y. Xu et al.
123
for 3.5 mm screws. In our study, the screw inserted from
the femoral intercondylar notch was a 3.5 mm or 4.5 mm
screw, in order to decrease articular cartilage defects.
However, the other two screws were 6.5 mm screws that
can bear more of the load.
Jarit et al. [6] reported that lag screws placed posterior to
anterior provided more stable fixation of Hoffa fractures in
embalmed femurs than anteroposteriorly placed lag screws.
However, this technique requires that the screw heads are
recessed beneath the articular surface, and produces a large
articular surface defect. In our new method, the screw
inserted from the femoral intercondylar notch is placed
posterior to anterior, but the other two screws are placed in
a lateral to medial direction, which is not perfect. However,
our new method does not damage the articular surface, so
we recommend it.
Borse et al. [1] reported that they treated a case of Hoffa
fracture by open reduction and internal fixation with
headless compression screws. This method placed two
screws in a posterior to anterior direction. This provides
more stable fixation, allows for a minimally invasive
approach, and reduces the chance of damage to the artic-
ular surface. However, this method has not been described
anywhere else in the literature. Because of this, the feasi-
bility of this method must be studied further clinically. Our
new method does not damage the functional articular
surface, and the fixation is stable, so we believe that our
new method is effective.
McCarthy and Parker [7] presented a case report
describing an alternative treatment method: arthroscopic
reduction and internal fixation of a displaced, malrotated
intraarticular lateral femoral condyle fracture of the knee.
The potential benefits included decreased blood loss,
shortened operative time, excellent intraarticular visuali-
zation, decreased soft tissue dissection, and shortened
postoperative recovery. However, the arthroscopic reduc-
tion associated with this method requires a highly skilled
surgeon, and so has only seldomly been reported. On the
other hand, our new fixation method is easy to learn and
requires less equipment, so we expect this novel technique
to be a more popular option.
Michael et al. [8] reported that they treated Hoffa frac-
tures using a posterior approach. Because of the complex
popliteal anatomy involved, this approach was not com-
monly used. In our study, open reduction for Letenneur
type II Hoffa fractures was difficult. We therefore believe
that the posterior approach may be more well suited to
Letenneur type II Hoffa fractures.
However, the results of our study do not allow us to
draw any solid conclusion about the stability of the new
method in comparison to the traditional methods, so further
mechanical and clinical studies are needed. Also, long-term
follow-up is needed to compare the risk of osteoarthritis
among these methods.
In conclusion, we believe that our new fixation method
for Hoffa fracture is effective and may provide a new way
to treat Hoffa fractures.
Conflict of interest None.
References
1. Borse V, Hahnel J, Cohen A. Hoffa fracture: fixation using
headless compression screws. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2010;
36(5):477–9.
2. Letenneur J, Labour PE, Rogez JM, Liqnon J, Bainvel JV. Hoffa’s
fracture: report of 20 cases. Ann Chir. 1978;32(3):213–9.
3. Lewis SL, Pozo JL, Muirhead-Allwood WFG. Coronal fracture of
the lateral femoral condyle. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1989;71:
118–20.
4. Friedman RL, Glisson RR, Nunley JA 2nd. A biomechanical
comparative analysis of two techniques for tibiotalar arthrodesis.
Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15(6):301–5.
5. Becker P, Stafford PR, Goulet R, Nowotarski P. Comparative
analysis for the fixation of coronal distal intraarticular femur
fractures. Presented at: 67th Annual Meeting of the American
Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2000 March 15–19, Orlando,
FL, USA.
6. Jarit GJ, Kummer FJ, Gibber MJ, Egol KA. A mechanical
evaluation of two fixation methods using cancellous screws for
coronal fractures of the lateral condyle of the distal femur (OTA
type 33B). J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(4):273–6.
7. McCarthy JJ, Parker RD. Arthroscopic reduction and internal
fixation of a displaced intraarticular lateral femoral condyle
fracture of the knee. Arthroscopy. 1996;12(2):224–7.
8. Medvecky MJ, Noyes FR. Surgical approaches to the posterome-
dial and posterolateral aspects of the knee. J Am Acad Orthop
Surg. 2005;13(2):121–8.
A new fixation method for Hoffa fracture 91
123