6. mr. rishi jain
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 6. Mr. Rishi Jain
1/13
R K Jain
-
7/30/2019 6. Mr. Rishi Jain
2/13
CO2 emission responsible for globalwarming
Development process to go unhalted .
Ways and means to be found for controllingand abating CO2.
Energy efficient technologies, energyconservation , reduction in T&D losses tohelp CO2 emission.
Ultimate solution may lie in CO2 captureand storage (CCS) which can stabilize CO2
concentration at 450 or 550 ppm.
CCS as potential of reducing emission by
85% or more by 2050.
-
7/30/2019 6. Mr. Rishi Jain
3/13
CO2 capture and storage system
Fuels
Processes
Transport
Storage options
-
7/30/2019 6. Mr. Rishi Jain
4/13
Post combustion - CO2 separation fromflue gases by chemical absorption with
monoethanolamine (chilled ammonia processunder development).
Pre Combustion - CO2 separation inreformer after gasification of fuel (sorbentsused for separation).
OxyFuel -Separating O2 and N2from air and using O2 to burn fuel.
-
7/30/2019 6. Mr. Rishi Jain
5/13
Ocean Storage (~nearly 1000 GtCO2potential depending on environmentalconstrains)Geological storage (potential 2000GtCO2).This can enable enhanced oil or gasrecovery.Deep saline aquifers (potential 5-500 billiontCO2 ).Appears to be best long term solution.
Depleted oil and gas reservoirs (good sitesbecause of proven caprock).
-
7/30/2019 6. Mr. Rishi Jain
6/13
CCS: geological storage potential
-
7/30/2019 6. Mr. Rishi Jain
7/13
Capture Efficiency - 85-95%
Net CO2 reduction - 80-90%
Additional Energy use -10-40%
-
7/30/2019 6. Mr. Rishi Jain
8/13
Planned storage (MtCO2)
Canada 20
Algeria 17Norway 20
Nether Land 8
USA 0.0016
-
7/30/2019 6. Mr. Rishi Jain
9/13
For pulverized Coal Plants cost of CCS couldvary between 61 to 99 US$/MWhr whereas costof carbon mitigation could vary between 30 to70 US$/ CO2 avoided
Cost of Capture 15-75% US$/tCO2Cost of Transportation for 250 km 1-8 US$/tCO2
Geological Storage 0.5 -8 US$/tCO2 injectedOcean storage 5-30 US$/tCO2 injected
Cost of coal fired plant could increase byaround 25% with adoption of CCS.
-
7/30/2019 6. Mr. Rishi Jain
10/13
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
CostofElectricit
y(US$/
MWh
)
CO2 emission factor (tCO2/MWh)
New Plantswith Capture
New Gas and Coal Plants without Capture
Pulverized Coal Combustion (PC)
Coal Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC)
Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC)
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
CostofElectricit
y(US$/
MWh
)
CO2 emission factor (tCO2/MWh)
New Plantswith Capture
New Gas and Coal Plants without Capture
Pulverized Coal Combustion (PC)
Coal Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC)
Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC)
Pulverized Coal Combustion (PC)
Coal Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC)
Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC)
-
7/30/2019 6. Mr. Rishi Jain
11/13
Lack of real Data
Appropriate Site selection for geological
storage.Monitoring program to detect problems.
Remedial methods to stop CO2 releases
Important to evaluate potential for seepagebased on site characteristics
-
7/30/2019 6. Mr. Rishi Jain
12/13
It is estimated that fraction retained inappropriately selected and managed
geological reserves may be more than 99%over 1000 years
Release is estimated to be gradual overhundreds of years
-
7/30/2019 6. Mr. Rishi Jain
13/13
Technical issues Scale up of technology for CO2 separation.
Efficiency improvements in compression of CO2.
Chances of leakage of stored CO2
Damages on account of leakage of CO2
Economic Issues More detail assessments needed to improve equipment design and cost
estimates.
Legal Issues Property rights to underground space for storage
Legal considerations for potential CO2 leak
Regulatory Issues Building a regulatory framework for CCS needed.