6 capital project prioritization - fefpa capital project prioritization.pdf · capital project...

29
Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools David Wildes Director of Physical Plant, Facilities Planning and Construction, TCC

Upload: phamhanh

Post on 18-Mar-2018

227 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

Capital Project Prioritization

Ken Marsh, AICP

Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota

County Schools

David Wildes

Director of Physical Plant, Facilities Planning and

Construction, TCC

Page 2: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

SESSION GOALS

• For participants to

– Learn specific tools to prioritize large K-12 capital

projects

– Learn options for prioritizing college and

university small projects

– Share other best practices

Page 3: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

TOPICS COVERED

• Major topic = Prioritization Schemes

• Brief Mention

– Capital Revenue Streams

– Necessary Data

– Decision-Making Scenarios

– Other Influences

– Capital Budget Elements

Page 4: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

WHAT OTHER TOPICS SHOULD WE

COVER?

WHAT SPECIFICALLY WOULD YOU

LIKE TO LEARN FROM THIS

SESSION?

Page 5: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

CAPITAL REVENUE STREAMS

• K-12

– Millage

– Capital Outlay & Debt

Service

– PECO

– Sales Tax

– Impact Fees

– Concurrency Mitigation

– Borrowing

• College/University

– PECO Rem/Ren

– PECO Sum of the Digits

– PECO – New Projects

– Capital Outlay & Debt

Service

– SBOE bonds (until 2011)

– Local Capital

Improvement Fees

– Foundation

– Major Donors

Page 6: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

NECESSARY DATA, K-12

• Plant Survey, Five-Year Work Plan, Project

Prioritization List

• COFTE projections and Revenue Trends

• Facility Data

• Educational Initiatives

• Legislative Mandates

Page 7: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

NECESSARY DATA, College/University

• Educational Plant Survey

• Facility Condition Matrix

• Capital Improvement Plan

• Educational Initiatives

– Use of portal for dean & director input

• Annual SREF safety inspection

• Energy initiatives

Page 8: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

DECISION-MAKING SCENARIOS

• K-12

– Board-driven

– Superintendent-driven

– Staff-driven

• Florida College System

– Board of Trustees

– President and VP’s

– Deans and Executive

Directors

– College staff

Page 9: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

Sarasota County Schools

• Capital Projects Team

– Membership

• Instructional Executive Directors & Chief Operating

Officer

• Department Heads for Facilities, Construction,

Telecom, Instructional Technology, Safety & Security

• Chief Building Official/Staff Architect, Planning Analyst,

Archibus Facilitator

• Led by Director of Long Range Planning

Page 10: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

Sarasota County Schools

• Capital Projects Team

– Responsibilities

• Operations sub-group meets bi-monthly to coordinate

on-going projects to prevent “public works syndrome”

• Full CPT meets 3-4 times per year

– September to review completed and on-going projects

– January to prioritize Large Projects [new schools; classroom

wings; major infrastructure initiatives]

– February to prioritize Small Projects to be completed in the

summer

– As needed

Page 11: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

OTHER INFLUENCES

• Financial Advisory Committees

• Historic Preservation

• Joint-Use / Co-location opportunities

• other

Page 12: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

CAPITAL BUDGET ELEMENTS

• Sarasota

– Recurring

– Growth-related

– Competing Projects

– New Initiatives

• TCC

– College landscape is very

different:

• Uncertain funding for major

projects

• Growth at main campus has

stopped

– Focus has changed to

PECO R&R

• Safety corrections

• ADA survey by FCS

• New programs/initiatives

• Infrastructure and facilities

renewal

Page 13: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

PRIORITIZATION SCHEMES

• Sarasota District

– Matrix

– Building-level FCI [Facility Condition

Index]

• Palm Beach District

– Pair-wise

Comparisons

• TCC

– Major projects:

– CIP

– General Rem/Ren

– Matrix based

on project

type

Page 14: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

Significant Capacity Needs 1 Average Age of Relocatables 3 Cost of Maintenance Projects Pending 5 Past Five Yrs' Capital Investments 7

>50% in reloc. 5

>50% over 20

yrs 5 > $20 million 5 <$1.0 million 5

40-49 % 4 40-49 % 4 $10.00 - 19.99 million 4 $1.0 - 2.9 million 4

30-39% 3 30-39% 3 $5.00 -9.9 9million 3 $3.0 - 5.9 million 3

16-29% 2 16-29% 2 $1.00 - 4.99 million 2 $6.0 - 7.9 million 2

1-15% 1 1-15% 1 $0.50 - 0.99 million 1 $8.0 - 9.9 million 1

perm. space avail. 0

zero relocatabl

es 0 <$0.49 million 0 >10 million 0

Duration of Over-Capacity 2 Projected 5-Year Core Status 4 Utility Costs per Square Foot 6 Facility Condition Index 8

>10% in Relocatables > than 20 yrs 5 >160% 5 >$2.00 5 >30% 5

11 -19 yrs 4 140-159% 4 $1.75-1.99 4 24-29% 4

7-10 yrs 3 125-139% 3 $1.50-1.74 3 18-23% 3

3-6 yrs 2 111-124% 2 $1.25-1.49 2 12-17% 2

1-2 yrs 1 100-110% 1 $1.00-1.24 1 6-11% 1

< 10% in relocatables now 0 0 - .99 0 <$1.00 0 <6% 0

LEGEND WEIGHTING RATIONALE

#1 - computations are based on (relocatable student stations) ÷ (permanent student stations) In general, each issue is weighted according to the School Board's capital budget priorities:

#2 - the length of time the school has had greater than 10% of its student stations in relocatables

Weight of 5 = assigned to "safety and security" and to the cost of pending projects

#3 - the percentage of relocatables that are greater than 20 years oldWeight of 4 = updated Facility Index score

#4 - computed as (2017-18 projection) ÷ (permanent program capacity) Weight of 3 = future capacity-related issues

#5 - maintenance and capital improvements identified as beyond their expected useful life cycle or current deficiencies

Weight of 2 = utility costs and recent capital expenditures [an inverse relationship]

#6 - the cost of electricity for this site

Weight of 1 = three issues related to current capacity of the school or building#7 - all capital funds invested at each site during the past five years

#8 - the latest index score

#9 - based upon analysis by the Office of Safety and Security

Page 15: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

Duration of Over-Capacity 2Projected 5-Year Core

Status 4

>10% in Relocatables > than 20 yrs 5 >160% 5

11 -19 yrs 4 140-159% 4

7-10 yrs 3 125-139% 3

3-6 yrs 2 111-124% 2

1-2 yrs 1 100-110% 1

< 10% in relocatables now 0 0 - .99 0

#2 - the length of time the school has had greater than 10% of its student stations in

relocatables

#4 - computed as (2017-18 projection) ÷ (permanent program capacity)

Page 16: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

Cost of Maintenance Projects Pending 5

Past Five Yrs' Capital Investments 7

> $20 million 5 <$1.0 million 5

$10.00 - 19.99 m 4 $1.0 - 2.9 m 4

$5.00 - 9.99 m 3 $3.0 - 5.9 m 3

$1.00 - 4.99 m 2 $6.0 - 7.9 m 2

$0.50 - 0.99 m 1 $8.0 - 9.9 m 1

<$0.49 m 0 >10 million 0

#5 - maintenance and capital improvements identified as beyond their expected useful

life cycle or current deficiencies

#7 - all capital funds invested at each site during the past five years

Page 17: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

SchoolDuration of Over-Capacity

Projected 5-Year Core

Status

Cost of Maint.

Projects Pending

Utility Costs

Past Five Years' Capital Invest

Facility Condition

Index

Security CPTED

Analysis

2013

Total

2012 Total

2012-2013 Capital Plan, etc.

weight 1 3 5 2 2 4 5

Bay Haven 3 3 20 8 8 8 25 75 73

Sarasota HS 0 0 25 2 4 8 25 64 83 classrooms, gym, media, food service, site, etc.

Pine View 3 9 20 2 8 4 10 56 82

Gocio 5 12 0 4 8 4 20 53 66

Venice MS 0 0 20 2 8 8 15 53 36

SCTI-South 0 12 0 0 n/a 20 20 52 29

Brentwood 0 0 20 2 8 8 10 48 26

Fruitville 5 6 0 8 8 4 10 41 46 ice storage funded 2011-13

Ashton 5 9 0 6 10 0 10 40 31

Garden 5 9 0 4 8 4 10 40 47

Englewood 0 3 10 4 8 8 5 38 29

Southside 0 9 0 2 8 4 15 38 5

Alta Vista 0 0 5 4 8 12 5 34 33

Cranberry 3 6 0 4 10 0 10 33 21

SCTI-Fire Academy 3 0 0 0 10 0 20 33 33

Taylor Ranch 4 0 0 4 8 0 15 31 38

E E Booker 0 0 0 2 8 4 15 29 35

Oak Park 0 0 0 6 8 0 15 29 35

Phillippi Shores 1 3 0 2 10 0 10 26 15

Toledo Blade 0 0 0 0 4 0 20 24 23

McIntosh 0 0 0 0 8 0 15 23 26

Sarasota MS 0 0 0 4 4 0 15 23 60 HVAC 2012-14

Tatum Ridge 0 3 0 2 8 0 10 23 14

Page 18: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

SchoolDuration of Over-Capacity

Projected 5-Year Core

Status

Cost of Maint.

Projects Pending

Utility Costs

Past Five Years' Capital Invest

Facility Condition

Index

Security CPTED

Analysis

2013

Total

2012 Total

2012-2013 Capital Plan, etc.

Lakeview 5 6 0 4 2 0 5 22 38

Laurel Nokomis 0 0 0 2 4 0 15 21 54 HVAC renovation 2010-13

Booker MS 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 20 63 HVAC renovation 2012-2016

Brookside 0 0 0 2 8 0 10 20 22

North Port HS 0 0 0 4 6 0 10 20 22

Phoenix 0 3 0 4 10 0 0 17 14

Riverview HS 0 3 0 4 0 0 10 17 4

Tuttle 0 0 5 4 8 0 0 17 15

Gulf Gate 0 0 0 2 8 0 5 15 15

Heron Creek 0 0 0 2 8 0 5 15 19

TRIAD 0 0 0 0 10 0 5 15 21

Venice ES 0 3 0 2 10 0 0 15 18

Wilkinson 0 0 0 4 10 0 0 14 14

Lamarque 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 12 15

Suncoast Poly HS 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 5

Glenallen 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 7 12

Venice HS 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 7 31 rebuild 2010-15

Atwater 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0

SCTI-Main 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 15 rebuild 2007-14

Booker HS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 rebuild 2010-14

Woodland MS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

Page 19: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

Building-Level Analyses,

Using ASTM CSI Uniformat II Coding

Row Labels

BUILDING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT

ADA & SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION

EQUIPMENT & FURNISHINGS

INTERIORS

SERVICES

SHELL

SUBSTRUCTURE

EQUIPMENT LEVEL ASSESSMENT:

EQUIPMENT & FURNISHINGS

ROOFING COVERING ASSESSMENT:

SHELL

SITE LEVEL ASSESSMENT:

SITEWORK

Grand Total

Page 20: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

Facility Condition Index data

Page 21: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

Campus Building USE Year

Gross Area

(Sq.Ft.)Deferred

Maintenance FCI CapitalDeferred + Renewal Replacement

BAY HAVEN SCHOOL OF BASIC

008-04 Art/Music 1966 1,770 $172,469 62.25% $32,835 $205,304 $277,076

ENGLEWOOD ELEMENTARY

015-04 Classrooms 1958 5,156 $435,728 56.19% $213,593 $649,321 $775,425

ALTA VISTA ELEMENTARY

001-02 Butterfly 1957 19,196 $1,429,560 49.90% $322,128 $1,751,688 $2,864,738

Sarasota HS - West Campus

007-42 Classrooms 1958 18,799 $1,188,968 44.94% $619,672 $1,808,640 $2,645,867

Sarasota HS - West Campus

007-04 Vacant Classrooms

1958 46,824 $2,965,395 43.23% $2,691,345 $5,656,740 $6,859,416

Sarasota County Public Schools

Page 22: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

Palm Beach Scheme

• Pair-wise comparisons by 25 staff and 6 Board

Members for 40 projects

– Additions and expansions

– Modernizations

– Rebuilds

– Athletic fields, pools

– Maintenance compounds

• Comparisons are of issues, not projects

Page 23: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

Palm Beach Scheme Results

• Funding Integrity @ 48%

– Construction investment

– On Referendum list (highest weighting @ 17.65%)

– Socioeconomic status (up to 10.55%)

– COPs (11.2%)

• Educational Environment @ 38%

– Needed for CSR (2nd highest @ 16.35%)

– Reduce overcrowding (11.8%)

– New programs (9.6%)

Page 24: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

Palm Beach Scheme [cont.]

• Operational Efficiency @ 14%

– Outdated instructional buildings

– Reduction of operating expenses

– Removal of >20-year old relocatables (<6%)

– Required by other projects

– Ancillary facilities service delivery

Page 25: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

Combined

FY2009

Ranking

Order

Project Description

Original

Funding

Year

(per

Referendum)

Constructio

n

Investment

*On

Referendu

m List

SES

Tier 1

(50-

59.49%)

SES

Tier 2

(59.5-

74.49)

SES

Tier 3

(74.5-

89.49)

SES

Tier 4

(89.5-100)

COPs

Promise

d

If CSR

is Recv'd

Needed

for CSR

Reduce

Overcrowdin

g

New

Programs

Replace

or

Renovat

e

Old/Poor

Academi

c

Buildings

Reduces

Operating

Expenses

Removal

+20 Yr Old

Portable

Classrooms

Required

Due to

Impact

of Other

Projects

Ancillary

Facilities-

Service

Efficienc

y

Total

Percentag

e

Score

Combine

d

FY2009

Ranking

Order

FY2008

Previous

Rank

FY2008

Previous

Rank

Adjusted

4.90% 17.65% 2.64% 5.28% 7.91% 10.55% 11.20% 3.75% 16.35% 11.80% 9.60% 4.70% 2.90%

**

(see legend

below) 1.60% 1.10%

1 West Central Elem 03-W FY07 4.90% 20.65% 0.00% 5.28% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 16.35% 11.80% 9.60% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 68.58% 1 43 14

2 Seminole Trails Elem Addition FY08 4.90% 19.65% 0.00% 5.28% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 16.35% 11.80% 0.00% 0.00% 2.90% 5.95% 0.00% 0.00% 66.83% 2 26 6

3 Pahokee Elem Addition ( part of 03-MM) FY05 4.90% 22.65% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 10.55% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 9.60% 0.00% 2.90% 2.95% 1.60% 0.00% 55.15% 3 none 16

4 Plumosa K-5 Modernization FY08 4.90% 19.65% 0.00% 0.00% 7.91% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 9.60% 4.70% 2.90% 1.95% 0.00% 0.00% 51.61% 4 32 8

5 Relocatables and Modulars Purchase Varies 0.00% 22.65% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 16.35% 11.80% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 50.80% 5 8 1

6 Belle Glade Elem Addition Pre-K FY08 4.90% 19.65% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 10.55% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 9.60% 0.00% 0.00% 3.95% 0.00% 0.00% 48.65% 6 39 12

7 Pahokee High Remodeling (part of 03-MM) FY05 4.90% 22.65% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 10.55% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 9.60% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 47.70% 7 none 16

7 Pahokee Middle (03-MM) FY05 4.90% 22.65% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 10.55% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 9.60% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 47.70% 7 47 16

9

West Area Educational Complex (West Tech)

Modern. FY05 4.90% 22.65% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 10.55% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 4.70% 2.90% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 45.70% 9 20 4

10 Riviera Beach High 02-MMM FY05 0.00% 22.65% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 10.55% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 9.60% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 42.80% 10 52 22

11 Manatee Elem Addition FY08 4.90% 19.65% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 11.80% 0.00% 0.00% 2.90% 2.95% 0.00% 0.00% 42.20% 11 23 5

12 Galaxy Elem Modernization FY10 0.00% 17.65% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 10.55% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 4.70% 2.90% 1.95% 0.00% 0.00% 37.75% 12 32 8

13 Village Academy Buildout FY06 4.90% 21.65% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 10.55% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 37.10% 13 51 21

14 Lake Worth Middle Core Addition FY07 0.00% 20.65% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 10.55% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 4.70% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 35.90% 14 10 2

14 Gove Elem Modernization 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 10.55% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 11.80% 0.00% 4.70% 2.90% 5.95% 0.00% 0.00% 35.90% 14 32 8

16 JF Kennedy Middle Athletic Fields FY05 4.90% 22.65% 0.00% 0.00% 7.91% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 35.46% 16 none none

17 North Palm Beach Elem Modernization FY09 0.00% 18.65% 0.00% 5.28% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 4.70% 2.90% 1.95% 0.00% 0.00% 33.48% 17 36 11

Page 26: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

Prioritization Schemes

• TCC

– Major projects:

• Projects listed in Capital Improvement Plan

• Priorities selected by President and Executive Team

based on staff input and College Strategic Plan

– Renovation/remodeling projects

• Matrix based on project type and funding source

• Matrix developed by Facilities Department and

approved by President and Executive Team

Page 27: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

Tallahassee Community College

Building No.Landscap

e Roof WindowsExt.

PaintExt.

BrickEave

sExt.

DoorsHVA

CLightin

gElecSys Flooring EMS

Int. Paint

Restrooms

Fire Sys Remarks

MAIN CAMPUS

English 1 G G F G G F G * G G1st-p 2nd-g G

1st-p 2nd-g G G

HVAC, 1ST FL. FAIR, 2ND FL. GOOD, ALL BLDGS.

NEED WASHED

Science Math Annex 2 G G F G F F F G G P G F G

Academic Support 3 G G F G F G G * G G G G G G G HVAC, 1ST FL. FAIR, 2ND FL. GOOD

Moore Lecture Hall 4 G G F G F F F G G P G n/a G

Communications and Humanities 5 G G F G F F F G G F G F G G

Dental Hygiene 6 G G F G F G G * G1st-p 2nd-g G

1st-p 2nd-g G G HVAC, 1ST FL. FAIR, 2ND FL. GOOD

Arcade (CoveredWalkway) 7

Academic Computing Center 8 G G F G G G G G G F G F G G

Centre 9 G G n/a G G G G G G G G G G G

Bridge (CoveredWalkway) 10

Tech. & Prof. Prog. 11 G G F G G G G G G F G G G G

Fine and PerformingArts Center 12 G G F G G G G * G G G G G G G HVAC, SOME GOOD, SOME FAIR

Ancillary (Deleted) 13

Ancillary (Deleted) 14

Lifetime Sports Ctr. 15 G G F G G G F G G G G G G G

Electrical 16 N n/a P G F F n/a G G n/a G n/a n/a F

Support ServicesBuilding 17 F G F G G G G G G G G G G G

Science and MathBuilding 18 G G F G G F F G G F G F G G

University Center 19 F G n/a G G G F G G G G G G G

Baseball Field House 20 P F n/a n/a G G G G G n/a G F G G

Richardson 21 F F n/a G G G R F G n/a G F G F

Andrews 22 F F F G G G G G G n/a G F G G

Baseball Concessions 23 G n/a n/a n/a G G G G G n/a G G G G

Vehicle Extrication(Covered Walkway) 24

Covered Area (Covered Walkway) 25

Not Assigned 26

Hinson Administration 27 G G F G G G F G G F G F G G

Central Energy Plant 28 G G n/a n/a n/a G N G G n/a G n/a G G

Bruce (Deleted) 29

Library 30 G G n/a G G G G G G F G F G G

Eagle's Nest/RyderBuilding 31 F G n/a G G G G G G G G F G G

Building Conditions Matrix

Page 28: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

Tallahassee Community CollegeProjects Summary Report

FUNDING SOURCE

10/11, 11/12 PECO R/R 10/11 CO/DS

TCC Foundation

SBOE Bond Fund LCIF

11/12 PECO Maint.

12/13 PECO Maint.(Tent.)

$98,410.66 $268,609.50 Carry over from prior year.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION $1,094,214.00 $252,305.00 1,000,000.00 $1,383,485.00 $1,500,000.00 $235,836.00 $156,801.00Fund Balance 07/01/2011

Projects committed and completed to date $807,982.66 $31,289.50 0.00 $1,560,222.50 $270,269.65 $189,761.00 $0.00

Allowance for ERP $400,000.00

Projects committed per ET 3/28/12

- FPSI Range Testing and Remediation $90,000.00

- Centennial Interior Remodel $200,000.00

- Gadsden Center New Project Allowance $200,000.00

- Renovate Finishes & Plumbing Dental Hygiene $170,000.00

- Furniture Replacement Allowance $75,000.00

- Science Lab Expansion and Remodel 900,000.00

Proposed "Mandatory" Projects

- ADA Revisions to Complete First Tranche $20,000.00

- EN Structure Remediation $20,000.00

- HSS, CT, WD, AD Floor Revision (Slip Issues) $32,000.00

- Lighting Enhancement, West Parking Lot $15,000.00

- Carpet/Flooring Replacement Allowance $50,000.00

GRAND TOTALS $944,982.66 $31,289.50 900,000.00 $1,650,222.50 $1,315,269.65 $189,761.00 $0.00

BALANCE AVAILABLE $247,642.00 $221,015.50 100,000.00 $1,872.00 $184,730.35 $46,075.00 $156,801.00

(Committed to (Committed to (Committed to

Infrastructure) Maintenance) Maintenance)

Page 29: 6 Capital Project Prioritization - FEFPA Capital Project Prioritization.pdf · Capital Project Prioritization Ken Marsh, AICP Director of Long Range Planning for Sarasota County Schools

[other schemes from audience]