3/23/2005 © dr. zachary wartell 1 depth and size perception

32
3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

Post on 19-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1

Depth and Size Perception

Page 2: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 2

Human Depth Perception

• Cue Theory – brain learns to identify info. in retinal image that is correlated with depth– oculomotor cues– pictorial cues– movement-produced cues– binocular disparity cues

Page 3: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 3

Oculomotor Cues: Accommodation

●susp. lig. kept tight by eye fluid which stretches and thins lens (bend light less)

●cil. mus. (donut shape) contracts allows lens to spring into its natural rounder shape (bend light more)

suspensory ligments

ciliary muscle

Page 4: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 4

Oculomotor Cues: Vergence

physical box

eyes

fixation point

Page 5: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 5

Oculomotor Cues: Vergence

physical box

eyes

divergence

Page 6: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 6

Oculomotor Cues: Vergence

physical box

eyes

convergence

Page 7: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 7

Pictorial/Monocular Depth Cues

• overlap/occlusion• size in field of view• height in field of view• atmospheric perspective• familiar size• linear perspective• texture gradiant

Page 8: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 8

Overlap/occlusion

• only relative or “ordinal” (psy.) information (partial order - math)

Page 9: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 9

Size in field of view

• larger size causes an object to appear closer• Ames balloon experiment

– inflating illuminated balloons in darkened room

Page 10: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 10

Height in field of view

Page 11: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 11

Atmospheric/aerial Perspective

• farther objects less distinct, color may be less saturated

Page 12: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 12

Familiar Size

• knowledge of actual size influences distance judgement

• Epstein (1965)– photo of 3 dime, quarter and nickel at same

size as quarter– viewed by one eye at same distance– darkened room, photo lit by spotlight– judged smaller coin to be closer– binocular viewing foils illusion

Page 13: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 13

Linear Perspective

• Leon Battisa Alberti (1435) – principles of perspective drawing

• Leonardo da Vinci – drawing on plane of glass

Page 14: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 14

Texture Gradient

• elements that are equally spaced appear closer and closer together in distance

Page 15: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 15

ab

Movement-Produced Cue: Motion Parallax

• looking out of car – near objects “move” faster and blur, far objects “move” slower

A B

a'b'

Δa

Δb

ab

Page 16: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 16

• related to motion parallax and overlap

Movement-Produced Cue: Deletion & Accretion

Deletion

Accretion

Page 17: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 17

Stereopsis

• Wheatstone (1838) – stereoscope showed that differences alone in left/right eye image yields depth

• “stereopsis” – impression of depth due to two different image on retina

Page 18: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 18

Corresponding Points

• locations on retina connecting to same part of visual cortex

a'b'

ab

f' f

[Goldstein,44]

Page 19: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 19

Corresponding Retinal Points

• locations on retina connecting to same part of visual cortex – roughly equivalent to aligning retina atop one another

a'b'

ab

f' f

left right

Page 20: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 20

Horopter

A

B

bl

br

cl

crC

horopteral

bl

cl

cr

ar

br

• A is fixation point• horopter points have

correspondingretinal images

• horopter dependenton fixation pt.

Page 21: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 21

Noncorresponding (disparate) retinal points

AB

bl

br

cl

cr

C

horopteral

bl

cl

crar

br

retinal disparity:

θb= θbl-θbr < 0 θc= θcl-θcr > 0

θ<0 θ>0

Page 22: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 22

Crossed (<0) versus Uncrossed (>0) disparity

ABC

horopter

uncrossedcrossed

Page 23: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 23

Corresponding (Image) Points

• correspondence problem – how does brain determine what left eye image point should be matched with what right eye image point?

(Al Ar)

(Al Cr)

(Cl Cr)

(Ar Cl)

al

cl

crar

?

Page 24: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 24

Random-Dot Stereogram - Julesz (1971)

Page 25: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 25

Al, Bl

F

FlFr

BA

Br Ar

Rear View

Top ViewHoropter

Zone of SingleVision

Panum’s fusion area

Al, Bl Fl Br Ar

Fr

Page 26: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 26

Local vs Global Stereopsis

• local stereopsis – simple stimuli (1 line), small FOV, image correspondence use local info

• global stereopsis – complex stimuli, large FOV, image correspondence needs global info.

• Important: experimental psychophysical results in local & global case can differ

Page 27: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 27

Types of stereopsis

• no stereopsis – diplopia / diplopic images, perceived depth at fixation plane or undefined

• patent/quantative stereopsis – magnitude, direction, maybe diplopic, small disparities

• latent/qualitative stereopsis - only direction, always diplopic

Page 28: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 28

Human Size Perception

• Visual Angle

Page 29: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 29

Law of Size Constancy

• humans correctly perceive an object’s physical size no matter what its distance from us and no matter what the size of image on retina is

• Holway and Boring (1941)

hallways

subject

targetcircle

test circles

1o

Page 30: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 30

Holway and Boring (1941)

10 50 100

10

20

30

distance to test circle (ft)

size

of t

arge

t circ

le (

in)

vis. angle

idealall cues

1 eye

+peep hole

+drapes

Page 31: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 31

Emmert’s Law

Page 32: 3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 1 Depth and Size Perception

3/23/2005 © Dr. Zachary Wartell 32

References

• E. Bruce Goldstein. Sensation and Perception, 4th Edition. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove.