20171021 personalized prevention strategy for cervical cancer
TRANSCRIPT
Personalized Prevention Strategy for Cervical Cancer
Chen-Yang Hsu
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences2017/10/21
Progression of Cervical Cancer
Regular Pap Smear Screening
3
Triennial Pap smear screening targeting women aged 30-69 is recommended
Given the 61% coverage rate, the efficacy of incidence reduction by 29% and mortality reduction by 50%
was estimated.
4
5
1982 HPV/Cx Ca link reported
2006-1 FDA approved first HPV vaccine (type 6, 11, 16, 18)
2009-10 FDA approved 2nd HPV vaccine (type 16, 18)
2011-10 CDC recommends HPV vaccine for boys
2014-12 FDA approved 9 strain vaccine
2015-7 Single dose may be enough (Lancet oncology)
1990 Experimental studies on HPV and Cx Ca evolved
1991 First vaccine developed
1999 HPV is the necessary factor for Cx Ca
Efficacy of HPV Vaccine
6
75% vaccine efficacy,75% vaccine coverage35% reduction in Cx Ca incidence
Progression of Cervical Cancer
Vaccination
HPV DNA testing
Regular Pap Smear Screening
8
Prevention Strategies for Cervical Cancer
Surveillance of precursor lesion
HPV Vaccination Pap Smear Screening
HPV DNA Testing
Cost-effectiveness Analysis for Prevention Strategies for Cervical Cancer: Pap smear, DNA testing, HPV, Vaccination
Annual Pap smear [+] Triennial Pap smear [+] Pap smear every 3 year+ HPV test [+] Pap smear every 5 year+ HPV test [+] Pap smear triennially + Vaccination
[+]
Chen MK, Hung HF, Duffy SW, Yen AMF, Chen HH*. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Pap Smear Screening and Human Papillomavirus DNA Testing and Vaccination. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(6):1050-8.
Cost-effectiveness Analysis for Cervical Cancer Prevention
Chen MK, et al.: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Pap Smear Screening and Human Papillomavirus DNA Testing and Vaccination. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(6):1050-8.
Vaccination + Pap Smear
Personalized Cervical Cancer Prevention: Risk-based Strategies
11
Public Health Genetics and Cervical Cancer Prevention Strategies
LaboratoryResearch
TranslationalResearch
ClinicalResearch
PopulationResearch
Public Health
• The application of advances in human genetics and molecular biotechnology to improve public health and prevent disease
• The impact of genetics on the art and science of promoting health and preventing disease through the organized efforts of society
• The effective translation of genome-based knowledge and technologies for benefit of population health
Healthy Women
CIN1, HPV-
CIN2/3, HPV-
HPVInfection
CIN1, HPV+
CIN2/3, HPV+
Invasive Carcinoma
Polymorphism Gene
CD28 rs3116496IFNG: rs2430561
Pre-miR: rs11134527LAMB3 rs2566
DAN Repairing SNPs
IFNG: rs11177074POLN rs17132382TMC: rs9893818….
DNA Methylation
CCNA1C13ORF18
SFRPDAPK
HIC-1…
Repairing SNPs
DUT: rs3784621GTF2H4: rs2894054OAS3: rs12302655SULF1: rs4737999
Risk Score
Effect Size of Genetic Markers on Cervical Cancer ProgressionMarkers RR Proportion in the general
population (%) ReferenceMarkers on Occurrence of Cervical Cancer Lesions
CD28+17 (TT) INFG+874 (AA) 0.78 23.6 Ivansson et al. 2010
Pre-mir-218 rs11134527 (GG)Pre-mir-218 rs11134527 (AA)
0.730.86
17.8 47.6
Zhou et al. 2010
LAMB3 rs2566 (TT)LAMB3 rs2566 (CT)
1.591.57
10.2 46.3
Zhou et al. 2010
CASP8 -652 6N del/delCASP8 -652 6N del/ins
0.530.75
10.3 39.8
Sun et al. 2007
DUT rs3784621 (CC)DUT rs3784621 (CT)
1.541.33
11.4 43.5
Wang et al. 2010
GTF2H4 rs2894054 (AA)GTF2H4 rs2894054 (AG)
0.110.57
2.1224.2
Wang et al. 2010
SULF1 rs4737999 (AA)SULF1 rs4737999 (AG)
0.590.59
7.7638.4
Wang et al. 2010
Markers on Persistent HPV InfectionIFNG rs11177074 (CC)IFNG rs11177074 (CT)
1.801.78
0.258.71 Wang et al. 2010
POLN rs17132382 (TT)POLN rs17132382 (CT)
2.161.35
3.8827.4
Wang et al. 2010
TMC8 rs9893818 (AA) 2.47 5.10 Wang et al. 2010
15
Methylation Effect on Transition of Cervical Neoplasm
Marker Methylation Frequency (%)
Relative Risk Reference
Normal LSIL LSIL HSIL HSIL Cx Ca
CCNA1 4.9% 42.1 - - Yang et al. 2009
C13ORF18 2.9% 67.7 - - Yang et al. 2009
SFRP 4.4% 3.92 1.06 18.4 Chung et al. 2009
DAPK 27% 2.11 3.44 0.97 Kim et al. 2010
HIC-1 24% 2.72 1.66 0.99 Kim et al. 2010
HIN-1 9.8% 2.13 1.57 1.35 Kim et al. 2010
MGMT 2.4% 1.29 4.07 2.47 Kim et al. 2010
RAR-beta 4.9% 3.58 4.35 1.32 Kim et al. 2010
RASSF1A 4.9% 2.77 2.31 1.27 Kim et al. 2010
SHP-1 4.9% 6.38 1.42 1.02 Kim et al. 2010
Twist 7.3% 1.80 4.54 0.79 Kim et al. 2010
Women with Positive HPVTransition probabiity from Cervical Cancer-free to Cervical Cancer
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0 5 10 15 20 25 30Time (years)
Case ACase BCase C
Case SNP DNA MethylationA Pre-miR-218: rs11134527 (AA) C13ORF18, DAPKB LAMB3: rs2566(CT); Pre-miR-218: rs11134527 (AA) DAPK, HIC-1, RAR-betaC LAMB3: rs2566(CT)
Women with Negative HPV Transition probabiity from free of Cervical Cancer to Cervical Cancer
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0 5 10 15 20 25 30Time (years)
Case DCase ECase F
Case SNP DNA Methylation
D IFNG: rs11177074 (CC or CT) , Pre-miR-218: rs11134527 (AG), LAMB3: rs2566(CT)
DAPK
E POLN: rs17132382 (CT) , LAMB3: rs2566(CT), CD28: rs3116496 (TT); IFNG rs2430561 (AA)
DAPK
F CD28: rs3116496 (TT); IFNG rs2430561 (AA)
Risk of Cervical Cancer by Percentile for Risk Score
Percentile Life-time Risk (%) RR10 0.113 0.3220 0.216 0.4230 0.237 0.5640 0.533 0.7450 0.751 1.0060 0.767 1.3070 1.078 1.8680 1.685 3.0490 2.488 9.53
Screening Strategy
Risk Score
<20% 20-40% 40-60% 60-80% >80%
HPV testing HPV testing HPV testing HPV testing HPV testing
- + - + - + - + - +HPV vaccination + Pap Smear screening by interscreening interval
1 yr 0.32 0.28 0.15 0.19 0.21 0.20 0.24 0.23 0.29 0.30
3 yr 0.32 0.29 0.24 0.21 0.26 0.23 0.26 0.25 0.36 0.32
5 yr 0.39 0.34 0.27 0.20 0.25 0.24 0.28 0.26 0.36 0.32
Pap Smear screening by interscreening interval 1 yr 0.37 0.31 0.33 0.28 0.35 0.35 0.44 0.40 0.42 0.44
3 yr 0.45 0.35 0.35 0.33 0.40 0.33 0.46 0.46 0.51 0.45
5 yr 0.44 0.42 0.43 0.41 0.42 0.39 0.50 0.46 0.54 0.48
HPV Vaccination 0.94 0.96 0.55 0.61 0.57 0.58 0.64 0.58 0.73 0.70
Baseline (lacking of any Intervention (baseline): RR=1.00
Simulated Cohort with 300,000 Taiwan women from birth
Conclusion1) HPV vaccination in combination with triennial screening would be cost-
effective if vaccination cost can be reduced
2) Genetic and methylation markers can be used to stratify population into
a series of risk levels
3) Triennial Pap smear along can reach the efficacy of reducing cervical
cancer incidence by 55-65% for low- median- risk women
4) HPV vaccination in combination with Pap smear is required for high risk
women
20
http://www.taiwan.net.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0001090