2016 amblyopia pedig studies
TRANSCRIPT
Amblyopia Treatment Studies Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group 2002-2016 (Publications as of September 13, 2016)
Alvina Pauline D. Santiago, MD
September 2016
http://pedig.jaeb.org/Studies.aspx
http://www.abcd-vision.org/amblyopia/ats-pedig.html
AP Santiago MD 2016
http://talleyeyecare.com
Amblyopia Treatment Study-1 (ATS-01)
Atropine vs part-time patch, moderate amblyopia
I. Arch Ophthalmol 2002: 120(3) 268-278
II. Arch Ophthalmol 2002: 120 (3) 281-287
III. Arch Ophthalmol 2003: 121 (11): 1625-32
IV. Arch Ophthalmol 2005: 123 (2): 149-157
V. J AAPOS 2005: 9 (6): 542-545
VI. Arch Ophthalmol 2008: 1039-1044
VII. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 July ; 132(7): 799–805
AP Santiago MD 2016
Amblyopia Treatment Study-1 (ATS-1)
Atropine vs part-time patch, moderate amblyopia
I. Arch Ophthalmol 2002: 120(3) 268-278 VA 20/40-20/100
3 or more lines: Atropine (74%) & Patching
(79%)
Atropine & patching similar for age 3-7 yr
Atropine better acceptability
AP Santiago MD 2016
Amblyopia Treatment Study-1 (ATS-1)
Atropine vs part-time patch, moderate amblyopia
II. Arch Ophthalmol 2002: 120 (3) 281-287 Clinical profile of moderate
amblyopia subjects moderate amblyopia
20/40-20/100
7 yrs and below
Same effect for strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia
AP Santiago MD 2016
Amblyopia Treatment Study-1 (ATS-1)
Atropine vs part-time patch, moderate amblyopia
III. Arch Ophthalmol 2003: 121 (11): 1625-32 Impact of patching vs atropine
Both well tolerated by child and family
Atropine more favorable
AP Santiago MD 2016
Amblyopia Treatment Study-1 (ATS-1)
Atropine vs part-time patch, moderate amblyopia
IV. Arch Ophthalmol 2005: 123 (2): 149-157 2 yr follow up after 6 month of
patching or atropine
Similar results in both groups
Amblyopic eye still 2 lines worse than sound eye
AP Santiago MD 2015
Amblyopia Treatment Study-1 (ATS-1)
Atropine vs part-time patch, moderate amblyopia
V. J AAPOS 2005: 9 (6): 542-545 Effect of amblyopia tx on ocular alignment
Same rates of deterioration or improvement in both groups
New strabismus by 2 yrs: most resolved after cessation of treatment
18% in patching: 2 greater than 8PD
16% in atropine: 3 greater than 8PD
AP Santiago MD 2015
Amblyopia Treatment Study-1 (ATS-1)
Atropine vs part-time patch, moderate amblyopia
VI. Arch Ophthalmol 2008: 1039-1044 10 year follow up
improvement of amblyopia maintained
Outcome similar for both groups
residual amblyopia common
treatment initiated at age 3-7 years
AP Santiago MD 2015
http://www.ibeta.com
Amblyopia Treatment Study-1 (ATS-1)
Atropine vs part-time patch, moderate amblyopia
VII. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 July ; 132(7): 799–805 15 year follow up
improvement of amblyopia maintained
Outcome similar for both groups
Mild residual amblyopia common treatment initiated at age
3-7 years
AP Santiago MD 2015
http://logopond.com/
Amblyopia Treatment Study-2 (ATS-2) (6h vs full; 2h vs 6h)
I. Ophthalmology 2003: 110(11) 2075-2087
II. Arch Ophthalmol 2003: 121 (5) 603-611
III. J AAPOS 2004: 8(5): 420-428
AP Santiago MD 2015
https://www.hosteurope.de
https://upload.wikimedia.org
https://blog.logos.com
Amblyopia Treatment Study-2A (ATS-2A) Patch 6 hrs vs full time, severe amblyopia
I. Ophthalmology 2003: 110(11) 2075-2087 Full time: all waking hrs minus 1 hour off
Severe amblyopia: 20/100-20/400
Age 3-7 years
After 4 months 4.8 lines in 6 hrs group; vs 4.7 in full time
AP Santiago MD 2015http://oceansignal.com
http://oceansignal.com
Amblyopia Treatment Study-2B (ATS-2B) Patch 2 hrs (minimal time) vs 6 hrs (part time)
for Moderate amblyopia
II. Arch Ophthalmol 2003: 121 (5) 603-611 moderate: 20/40-20/80
ages 3-7 years
At 4 months: 2.4 lines in both groups with 1 hr of near visual activity
AP Santiago MD 2015
https://www.hosteurope.de
https://upload.wikimedia.org
http://oceansignal.com
Amblyopia Treatment Study-2C (ATS-2C) Recurrence after cessation of
patching / Atropine
III. J AAPOS 2004: 8(5): 420-428 younger than age 8
3 months of amblyopia treatment
Recurrence same 24% of patched patients; 21% of
atropinized
1/4 experience recurrence within 1st year of cessation
RCT for weaning vs. no-weaning
AP Santiago MD 2015
Amblyopia Treatment Study-3 (ATS-3) 7 to < 18: spectacles vs atropine/patch
Arch Ophthalmol 2005: 123: 437-477 (Control)
Am J Ophthalmol 2004: 137: 581-583 (10-18yrs)
Arch Ophthalmol 2007: 125: 655-659
AP Santiago MD 2015
http://cdn4.teen.com
http://cdn4.teen.com
Amblyopia Treatment Study-3 (ATS-3) 7 to < 18: spectacles vs atropine/patch
ages 7-17 years
20/40-20/400
Given optimal optical correction then randomized
Tx: glasses, patch plus near activity, atropine
No Tx: glasses alone
AP Santiago MD 2015
http://cdn4.teen.com
Amblyopia Treatment Study-3 (ATS-3) 7 to < 18: spectacles vs atropine/patch
Responders: improved by >/= 10 letters / 2 lines
Amblyopia improves with Rx alone in 25%
Most patients left with residual VA deficit
Ages 7-12: tx improved amblyopia even if previously treated
Ages 13-17: tx improved if no previous tx for amblyopia
Unknown: if treatment results robust (if it will stay)
AP Santiago MD 2015
http://cdn4.teen.com
Amblyopia Treatment Study-4 (ATS-4) Atropine weekend vs daily; moderate amblyopia
Ophthalmology 2004: 111: 2076-2085 20/40-20/80
ages 3-7 years
Similar results with weekend atropine vs daily atropine
2.3 lines in both groups
AP Santiago MD 2015
https://thejobshop.files.wordpress.com
Amblyopia Treatment Study-5 (ATS-5) 3 to < 7, spectacles alone vs patch 2 hrs + spectacles
Ophthalmology 2006: 113 (6) 895-903. amblyopia improved with Rx by >/= 2
lines in 77%
amblyopia resolved in 27% with Rx alone
3 line improvement average
Lessen the burden of amblyopia therapy
AP Santiago MD 2015
http://cdn4.teen.com
Amblyopia Treatment Study-5 (ATS-5) 3 to <7, spectacles alone,
then patch 2 hrs vs spectacles
Ophthalmology 2006: 113 (6) 904-912. • Strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia
• 20/40-20/400
• 2 hrs (1 hr near activity) + specs vs. specs alone
AP Santiago MD 2015
Amblyopia Treatment Study-5 (ATS-5) spectacles alone, then patch 2 hrs vs spectacles
Ophthalmology 2006: 113 (6) 904-912. 5 wks: 1.1 lines treated; 0.5
lines specs
Any visit average: 2.2 lines treated; 1.1 lines specs
After glasses, 2 hrs patching (with 1 hr near activity) improves moderate to severe amblyopia
AP Santiago MD 2015
https://t2.ftcdn.net
✚
http://cdn4.teen.com
Amblyopia Treatment Study-6 (ATS-6) 3 to <7, patch 2 hrs with near vs far activities after spectacles
J AAPOS 2005: 9: 129-136 Pilot: 4 wks: suggestion of greater
improvement in amblyopic eye with near activities prescribed 2.6 lines near; 1.6 lines far (p=0.07)
AP Santiago MD 2015
http://www.adventuresetup.com
http://glacialblog.com
Amblyopia Treatment Study-6 (ATS-6)
3 to <7, patch 2 hrs with near vs far activities after spectacles (VA 20/40 to 20/400)
AP Santiago MD 2015
Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 2071-78 At 8 wks: improvement in
amblyopic eye Distance activity: 2.6 lines
Near activity: 2.5 lines 2.6 lines near; 1.6 lines far (p=0.07)
Similar for both groups, even at 2, 5, 17 wks.
http://s7.photobucket.com
Amblyopia Treatment Study-6 (ATS-6) 3 to <7, patch 2 hrs with near vs far activities after spectacles
(VA 20/40 to 20/400)
AP Santiago MD 2015
Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 2071-78 3.6 lines improvement in severe amblyopic group
Near activities do not improve VA outcome in anisometropic, strabismic, combined amblyopia with 2 hrs of daily patching
Severe amblyopia can respond even to 2 hrs of daily patching
http://www.getbettergradesnow.com
Amblyopia Treatment Study-7 (ATS-7) Bilateral refractive amblyopia; specs x 1 yr
(Response to treatment of previously untreated presumed bilateral refractive amblyopia)
Am J Ophthalmol 2007: 144: 487-496 20/40-20/400
less than 10 years
Hypermetropia >/= 4.0D; astigmatism >/= 2.0D
Eyeglasses alone improves binocular VA to 20/25 or better within 1 year
AP Santiago MD 2015
http://cdn4.teen.com
Amblyopia Treatment Study-8 (ATS-8) 3 to <7, atropine vs Atropine plus plano lens to sound eye
Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127(1):22-30 Moderate amblyopia .
20/40-20/100
Weekend atropine plus plano lens = atropine alone
AP Santiago MD 2015
http://dissurat.net
Amblyopia Treatment Study-9 (ATS-9) (7 to <13, ATS-1: weekend atropine vs. patch 2hours
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(12):1634-1642 Age 7-12; moderate amblyopia
20/40-20/100 Treatment with atropine or patching led to
similar degrees of improvement among 7- to 12-year-olds with moderate amblyopia. About 1 in 5 achieved visual acuity of 20/25 or better in the amblyopic eye.
Atropine and patching achieve similar results among older children with unilateral amblyopia
AP Santiago MD 2015
http://dissurat.net
https://t2.ftcdn.net
Amblyopia Treatment Study-10 (ATS-10) Bangerter filters vs. patching
Ophthalmology 2010;117:998-1004. |
moderate amblyopia 20/40-20/80; 3-<10y.
At 24 wks, 1.9 lines improvement with Bangerter, vs.2.3 lines in patching group
Because the average difference in visual acuity improvement between Bangerter filters and patching was less than half a line, and there was lower burden of treatment on the child and family, Bangerter filter treatment is a reasonable option to consider for initial treatment of moderate amblyopia.
AP Santiago MD 2015
ATS 11: A randomized trial to evaluate combined patching-atropine treatment for residual amblyopia
Evaluate effectiveness of treatment of residual amblyopia in 3-10y
VA 20/32 to 20/63 (mild residual amblyopia)
RCT: intensive treatment vs. rapid weaning plus glasses Intensive: (42 hrs weekly dose plus daily atropine)
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Randomized trial to evaluate combined patching and atropine for residual amblyopia. Arch Ophthalmol 2011;129(7):960-2.
AP Santiago MD 2015
http://www.clipartbest.com
ATS 11: A randomized trial to evaluate combined patching-atropine treatment for residual amblyopia
Intensive final push of combined treatment with patching and daily atropine did not produce a better visual acuity outcome after 10 weeks
Compared with a control group in whom treatment was gradually discontinued
AP Santiago MD 2015
http://www.clipartbest.com
ATS 11: A randomized trial to evaluate combined patching-atropine treatment for residual amblyopia
The study was stopped on recommendation of the data and safety monitoring committee slow recruitment conditional power analysis indicating that the
study was unlikely to find a statistically significant benefit
AP Santiago MD 2015
ATS 12: A randomized trial comparing patching with active vision therapy to patching with control vision
therapy as treatment for amblyopia in children 7 to < 13 years old
Lyon DW, Hopkins K, Chu RH et al. Feasibility of a clinical trial of vision therapy for treatment of amblyopia. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90(5): 475-481. 16 week vision therapy feasible
Standardizing approach to vision therapy not successful
AP Santiago MD 2015http://alderwoodvisiontherapy.com
ATS 13: An Observational Study of Optical Correction for Strabismic Amblyopia in
Children 3 to < 7 years old
Optical Treatment of Strabismic and Combined Strabismic Anisometropic Amblyopia. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 150-158. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
VA after 18 weeks improved mean of 2.6 lines
75% >/= 2 line, 54% >/= 3 lines
Resolution of amblyopia in 32%
Greater in Strabismic Amblyopia alone (3.2 vs 2.3 lines)
VA improved regardless of whether alignment better
Optical treatment alone results in clinically meaningful improvement; may consider as primary sole initial treatment for this group
AP Santiago MD 2015
ATS 14: A Pilot Study to evaluate levodopa as treatment for residual amblyopia in 8-17 years old
Repka MX, Kraker RT, Beck RW, et. al., Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Pilot study of levodopa dose as treatment for residual amblyopia in children aged 8 years to younger than 18 years. Arch Ophthalmol 2010;128(9):1215-7.
AP Santiago MD 2015
https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com
ATS 14: A Pilot Study to evaluate levodopa as treatment for residual amblyopia in 8-17 years old
At the time of enrollment, subjects were required to have been treated with at least 2 hours per day of daily patching
And stable visual acuity defined as less than 5 letters or one
logMAR line of improvement since a previous visit at least 8 weeks earlier.
AP Santiago MD 2015
https://www.hosteurope.de
ATS 14: A Pilot Study to evaluate levodopa as treatment for residual amblyopia in 8-17 years old
Intervention: continuing 2 hours of daily patching
addition of levodopa in one of two doses randomly assigned with equal probability (0.51 or 0.76 mg/kg/tid, referred to as lower dose and higher dose, respectively).
AP Santiago MD 2015
https://www.hosteurope.de✚
LEVODOPA +
CARBIDOPA
ATS 14: A Pilot Study to evaluate levodopa as treatment for residual amblyopia in 8-17 years old
Intervention: The study medication was administered for 8 weeks with
one additional week for tapering of treatment.
Levodopa was prepared in capsules combined with carbidopa 0.17 mg/kg/tid.
Carbidopa was combined with levodopa to reduce side-effects associated with levodopa alone.
AP Santiago MD 2015
ATS 14: A Pilot Study to evaluate levodopa as treatment for residual amblyopia in 8-17 years old
The mean improvement in amblyopic eye in 9-week primary outcome visit was +4 (±4) letters in the 16 subjects in the lower dose
group and
+6 (±6) letters in the 17 subjects in the higher dose group
AP Santiago MD 2015
ATS 14: A Pilot Study to evaluate levodopa as treatment for residual amblyopia in 8-17 years old
An improvement of 10 or more letters noted in 2 (13%) in low dose, and 5 (29%) in high dose group at 9 wks
Fellow eye improved 1 letter in high dose and zero letter is low dose group
Justification: Small sample, experience with drug, promising result
AP Santiago MD 2015
ATS 15: Increasing patching for amblyopia study from 2 hours to 6 hours
(3 to <8, 20/50 to 20/400)
When amblyopic eye VA stops improving with 2 hours of daily patching, increasing the daily patching dosage to 6 hours results in more improvement in VA after 10 weeks compared with continuing 2 hours daily.
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A randomized trial of increasing patching for amblyopia. Ophthalmology 2013 Nov;120(11):2270-7. Epub 2013 Jun 4
AP Santiago MD 2015
David K. Wallace, MD, MPH1; Elizabeth L. Lazar, MSPH2; Earl R. Crouch III, MD3; Darren L. Hoover, MD4; Raymond T. Kraker, MSPH2; Susanna M. Tamkins, OD; for the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Time course and predictors of amblyopia improvement with 2 hours of daily patching. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(5):606-609. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.6.
AP Santiago MD 2015
ATS 15: Increasing patching for amblyopia study from 2 hours to 6 hours
(3 to <8, 20/50 to 20/400)
ATS 16: Augmenting atropine treatment for amblyopia with plano lens to sound eye
3 to <8, 20/50 to 20/400
Objective: evaluate the effectiveness of adding a plano lens to weekend atropine in patients with amblyopia still present after visual acuity has stabilized with initial treatment.
Children ages 3 to <8 years with visual acuity of 20/50 to 20/400 in the amblyopic eye will be enrolled in a run-in phase with weekend atropine until no improvement,
followed by randomization of eligible patients to weekend atropine treatment with a plano lens over the sound eye versus without a plano lens over the sound eye.
AP Santiago MD 2015
Objective: evaluate the effectiveness of adding a plano lens to weekend atropine in patients with amblyopia still present after visual acuity has stabilized with initial treatment.
Children ages 3 to <8 years with visual acuity of 20/50 to 20/400 in the amblyopic eye will be enrolled in a run-in phase with weekend atropine until no improvement,
followed by randomization of eligible patients to weekend atropine treatment with a plano lens over the sound eye versus without a plano lens over the sound eye.
AP Santiago MD 2015
J AAPOS 2015;19:42-48 �
ATS 16: Augmenting atropine treatment for amblyopia with plano lens to sound eye
3 to <8, 20/50 to 20/400
Results:
atropine + plano lens = atropine only
1.1 vs 0.6, not statistically significant
Conclusion:
Small benefit to adding plano lens
Larger study recommended
AP Santiago MD 2015
J AAPOS 2015;19:42-48 �
ATS 16: Augmenting atropine treatment for amblyopia with plano lens to sound eye
3 to <8, 20/50 to 20/400
Amblyopia Treatment Study-17 (ATS-17) Levodopa for Residual Amblyopia
Ophthalmology. 2015 May;122(5):874-819
Objective: efficacy and short term safety of levopopa as adjunctive treatment to amblyopia
139 children 7-12 years old
Strabismic &/or anisometropic amblyopia
Residual 20/50-20/400 with patching
AP Santiago MD 2015
Amblyopia Treatment Study-17 (ATS-17) Levodopa for Residual Amblyopia
Intervention: 16 weeks while patching 2h/d oral levodopa (oral levodopa 0.76 mg/kg with carbidopa 0.17
mg/kg ) vs placebo TID
Results: at 18 weeks Levodopa = placebo (5.2 vs 3.8 letters=not statistically
significant)
No adverse effect from levodopa
AP Santiago MD 2015
What more PEDIG?
http://www.imore.com
http://www.geek.com
http://www.cclonline.com/
http://icons.iconarchive.com AP Santiago MD 2015
Amblyopia Treatment Study-18 (ATS-18) Binocular Computer Activities for Treatment of Amblyopia
REVIEW of LITERATURE
Li J, Thompson B, Deng D, Chan LY, Yu M, Hess RF. Dichoptic training enables the adult 1080 amblyopic brain to learn. Curr Biol 2013;23:R308-9. 1081
Hess RF, Thompson B, Black JM, et al. An iPod treatment of amblyopia: an updated 1082 binocular approach. Optometry 2012;83:87-94. 1083
To L, Thompson B, Blum JR, Maehara G, Hess RF, Cooperstock JR. A game platform for 1084 treatment of amblyopia. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2011;19:280-9. 1085
Li SL, Jost RM, Morale SE, et al. A binocular iPad treatment for amblyopic children. Eye (2014) 28, 1246–1253; doi:10.1038/eye.2014.165; published online 25 July 2014.
Li SL, Jost RM, Morale SE, et al. Binocular iPad Treatment of Amblyopia for Lasting Improvement of Visual Acuity. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(4):479-480. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.5515.
Birch EE, Li S, Jost RM, et al. Binocular iPad treatment for amblyopia in preschool 1088 children. J AAPOS 2014 AAPOS. 1089
AP Santiago MD 2015
Amblyopia Treatment Study-18 (ATS-18) Binocular Computer Activities for Treatment of Amblyopia
Ended May 2, 2016
To compare the effectiveness of 1 hour/day of binocular game play 7 days per week (minimum of 4 days per week) with 2 hours/day of patching 7 days per week, in children 5 to <13 years of age (younger cohort), as a non-inferiority study.
To compare the effectiveness of 1 hour/day of binocular game play 7 days per week (minimum of 4 days per week) with 2 hours/day of patching 7 days per week, in children 13 to <17 years of age (older cohort), as a superiority study.
AP Santiago MD 2015
Lessons learned from PEDIG Studies
1. Atropine = patching
2. 6 hours = full time
3. 2 = 6 hours
4. Amblyopia improves with glasses alone.
5. Add patching after glasses given time to work.
AP Santiago MD 2015
Lessons learned from PEDIG Studies
6. Spectacles and patching even for 13-17.
7. Daily = weekly
8. Near = Far
9. Severe amblyopia can improve even with 2 h of patching
10. Bangerter filter = patching
AP Santiago MD 2015
Lessons learned from PEDIG Studies
11. Intensive final push with atropine and patch not effective.
12. Levodopa promising but same as placebo.
13. 6h >2h: Increasing 2 to 6 hours can improve amblyopia (if plateau with 2 hours reached).
14. Plano lenses don’t work.
AP Santiago MD 2015
Every closed eye is not sleeping, and every open eye is not seeing.
-- Bill Cosby