2012Student Achievement Report

Board of Education MeetingOctober 25, 2012

Format and Purpose of the Report

Evaluate learning in: Communication Arts Mathematics Science Social Studies

Integrate results of multiple assessments

Look at achievement by content and grade span, not test

Answer the following questions: How much growth are students making? (Value-Added) How high is student achievement? (Comparisons) What is the trend in student achievement? (Trend)

Elementary School Middle School High School

K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 120123456789

101112131415

Average Above AverageBelow Average

What is Value-Added?

Grade

Grad

e Eq

uiva

lent

1 grade equivalent of growth for every year in school

1.2 grade equivalents of growth for every year in school

0.8 grade equivalents of growth for every year in school

K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12404550556065707580

Average Above Average

Perc

ent P

rofic

ient

Grade

What is Value-Added?

Explanation of Comparisons

Park H

ill

Platte

County

Ray-P

ec

Libert

y

Lees

Sum

mit

Blue S

pring

s

Parkway

Mehlvi

lle

Wen

tzville

55.0

57.0

59.0

61.0

63.0

65.0

67.0

Park H

ill

Platte

County

Ray-P

ec

Libert

y

Lees

Sum

mit

Blue S

pring

s

Parkway

Mehlvi

lle

Wen

tzville

55.0

57.0

59.0

61.0

63.0

65.0

67.0

Park H

ill

Platte

County

Ray-P

ec

Libert

y

Lees

Sum

mit

Blue S

pring

s

Parkway

Mehlvi

lle

Wen

tzville

55.0

57.0

59.0

61.0

63.0

65.0

67.0

LowMiddle

High

How are trends evaluated?

Use at least 3 data points

Identify source of variation: Cohort differences Changes to the test Normal measurement error Student population shifts Instructional changes

Achievement at a Glance

VACT-Based Analysis by Content Area and Grade Span

Primary Intermediate Middle School High School

VA C T VA C T VA C T VA C TCommunication Arts Mathematics Science   Social Studies      

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

66% 62% 48% 51% 70% 73% 80% 19% 36% 52% 44% 30% 25% 18% 14% 2% 0% 5% 0% 2% 2%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 201220

30

40

50

60

70

80

Comm Arts

Comm Arts Achievement at a Glance

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 201220

30

40

50

60

70

80

Math

Math Achievement at a Glance

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 201220

30

40

50

60

70

80

Comm Arts Math State

Achievement at a Glance

Park Hill Implications…

If an average student (50th percentile) started in Park Hill in Kindergarten and achieved the average growth for Park Hill students in 2012, what percentile would they end up in when they finished high school?

Pre K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2 Mathematics Communication ArtsHigh SchoolPrimary Intermediate Middle School

Growth by Grade Span – 201293rd percentile

89th percentile

Expected Growth z = 0.050th percentile

Pre K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2 Mathematics Communication ArtsHigh SchoolPrimary Intermediate Middle School

Statistically, what should we expect?

Pre K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1145

55

65

75

85

95

2011-2012

Expected Growth 50th Percentile

Overall Growth 91st percentile

1 Year 3 Years 5 Years 7 Years 9 Years 11 Years

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95C

orre

spon

ding

Per

cent

ile R

ank

Benefit of Staying in Park Hill

Opportunities for Improvement

• Transition successfully into MSIP 5

• Continue enhancing assessment plan to have data in Science, Social Studies, and early grades

• Although 2012 showed better growth results for Middle Level, greater growth at Middle Level is still desired

Establishing a culture of all-time-bests 19 assessment scores were best ever

Primary – 5 Intermediate – 3 Middle school – 8 High school – 3 2nd grade and 7th grade – highest

scores ever in every subject!

31 assessment scores were top 2 scores historically

Park Hill Achieves 19 All-Time Bests!

Park Hill Achieves 17 Personal Bests!In Addition

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012Comm. Arts 4th 1st 2nd 1st 4th

Mathematics 3rd 1st 1st 1st 1st

Science 3rd 1st 1st 1st 1st

End-of-Course Exam Comparative Rank

New Comparison Group

CSIP Goal A1.1 Objective: Improve MAP scores

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

2011-2012

2012-2013

55

60

65

70

75

80

Park HillGoal

Perc

ent P

rofic

ient

CSIP Goal A1.2 Objective: Improve MAP score for specific groups

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

2011-2012

2012-2013

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

Park HillGoal

Perc

ent P

rofic

ient

Gender Comparisons

3 4 5 6 7 8 HS0

0.20.40.60.8

1Communication Arts

3 4 5 6 7 8 HS

MathematicsMale Female

5 8 HS0

0.20.40.60.8

1Science

CSIP Goal A2 Objective: Educational Relevancy

2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-201350

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

FallSpringGoal

Perc

ent S

tron

gly

Agr

ee o

r A

gree

Plans for Improvement• Curriculum aligned with Common Core,

increasing rigor– Increased text complexity– Algebra earlier– Focus on academic vocabulary

• Instructional Frameworks Implemented– Reader’s and Writer’s workshop– Mathematics

• Focus on 21st century skills– FLiP– Training for teachers and administrators

• Integrated At-Risk Supports

Growth is average to above average in almost every area.

Achievement is high in all areas.

We are continuing to find areas to improve.

Achievement is high relative to local, state, and national comparisons.