8/3/2019 20111019 - Harvard Business Review

1/2

A Female-Dominated Workplace Won't Fix Everything

9:08 AM Monday October 17, 2011 by Anne Kreamer

Men on the job must feel besieged. Two seismic shifts are underway that are irrevocably

changing the ways in which we've believed work works.On the one hand, new technologies have enabled neuroscience to discover that men andwomen tend to be wired differently in ways that incline men can it be? to behave moreemotionally and irrationally in certain work situations, exploding the myth that women are theonly emotional creatures in the workplace.

Recent research, like that led by Cambridge University neuroscientist John Coates(http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/audio/2008/apr/15/city.trader.testosterone), suggests thatsurges in male financial traders' testosterone produce states of euphoria that cause them tounderstate risk, thus contributing to the overleveraged global financial crash. Since mennaturally produce ten times as much testosterone as women, it's being suggested that a moregender-balanced financial workforce could be stabilizing for firms and for the system as awhole.On the other hand, the metrics of 21st century female professional and economic

empowerment have become a tide. As of the last two years, more American workers arefemale than male, and the postindustrial occupations in which women predominate healthand education, among others are the growth sectors. Women today account for 57% of

college undergraduates, 62% of graduate students, and majorities of those graduating frommedical and law schools. Despite the continuing rarity of women at the very tops of largecorporations (which will inexorably shift as the cohort of overwhelmingly male CEOs retiresduring the next decade) and in finance, a 2004 study by the women's group Catalyst, The

Bottom Line: Connecting Corporate Performance and Gender Diversity(http://www.catalyst.org/publication/82/the-bottom-line-connecting-corporate-performance-and-gender- diversity), concluded that companies with the highest percentages of women intheir executive ranks achieved 35% higher returns on average. What's more, according to the

Center for Women's Business Research, women today own 40% of the private businesses inthe United States and a study released last year found that (the relatively few) high-tech start-ups led by women fail less frequently than those led by men(http://www.businessinsider.com/truth-women-led-startups-generate-higher-revenues-and-have-fewer-failures- 2011-9). After 40 years of feminist-era dues paying, women's momenthas come. Hear us roar.

As a woman who came of age in the late 1970s and who has worked in sometimesunproductively male- dominated workplaces, I'm with the program so far. Two-income familiesare the new normal. Economic parity for women is a good thing. But I don't think we shouldrush into simplistically thinking that a female-dominated workplace will change everything and

8/3/2019 20111019 - Harvard Business Review

2/2

overnight make the world perfect. The bigger opportunity, and indeed an essential rethink ifwe are to reboot our economy, is finally to move beyond circa-1970s gender-centric ideologyinto a larger, more constructive conversation about how to reinvent workplace norms.We humans, women and men alike, are hobbled by a gigantic evolutionary time lag. We haveno clue how to handle 21st century cognitive threats, real life in the modern workplace. Weevolved, survived, through our ability to respond to physical threat is that a snake on the

trail or a stick? Our bodies' stress hormones, adrenaline, cortisol and testosterone, amongothers, which raise blood pressure and send more blood to our muscles, historically made usmore alert in preparation to fight or flee imminent physical threats. Whether I'm fleeing acharging lion or cowering before a screaming boss, the amygdala responds, on a basic level,in a very similar way. Deep inside we are all irredeemably super-old-school. But the reality is

that emotion is far more complicated in a modern work setting than it was for our prehistoricancestors on the savanna. Is the person in the next cubicle gunning for my job? How will I getmy work done when the babysitter calls in sick? And this disconnect this evolutionary delayin the development of more emotionally nuanced or sophisticated responses to psychologicalchallenges is a huge contributor to what makes navigating modern work/life so incredibly

hard.

In a 2008 paper on gender differences (http://gpi.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/11/2/143),five psychologists Kateri McRae and James Gross of Stanford, Kevin Ochsner of

Columbia, Iris Mauss of the University of Denver, and John Gabrieli of MIT reported thatwhile men and women don't really differ in their basic "reactivity" to emotional provocation,they are quite different in the ways in which they respond. Based on both subsequentquestioning and neural responses to aversive photos as measured by fMRI brain scans, theauthors discovered no significant differences between the genders in the speed of theirreactions to stimuli. But there are gender-based distinctions in how men and women wereable to regulate and manage their emotional response to these stimuli. The amygdala was

less activated in men's brains than in women's, and portions of the women's prefrontal cortex,the cognitive control center, were more active than those of the men. The relatively newscience of emotion is beginning to pinpoint precisely the neurochemical differences betweenthe ways women and men tend to approach and deal with emotion, and it is important neitherto let PC feminist ideology or neo- Victorian "Ooh, ick" squeamishness blind us to the findings.A too-reductive men-are-from-mars-women-are-from -venus perspective serves no one.Rather than stigmatize the characteristic emotional biologies of one gender or the other, itshould be the goal of any person or organization to allow all emotion at work, in all of itsgendered nuances, its full due. Understanding the truths that neuroscience is revealing willallow us greater awareness and thus control of the emotions that shape our decisions and

behavior at work. Learning and paying attention to the emotions that motivate and/or hobbleus and in what measure anger, anxiety, fear, joy can help us learn to manage and usethose emotions more effectively. I'd like to think that today, with U.S. women irrevocably atwork and the economy in such dire straits, that we can safely raise all kinds of questions

without endangering progress. When it comes to emotions and work, we should start beingmore unflinchingly analytical and empirical than ever before. As science discovers, confirms,and refines new understandings of gender-based aspects of emotion, let's try not to react tothem too emotionally.