2004 graduating student survey - utah state university student survey - 200… · the graduating...

Analysis, Assessment & Accreditation

2004 Graduating Student Survey

August 2004

2004 GRADUATING STUDENT SURVEY

OFFICE OF ANALYSIS, ASSESSMENT, AND ACCREDITATION

AUGUST 2004


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Each year, the Office of Analysis, Assessment, and Accreditation conducts a survey of graduating baccalaureate students to determine their attitudes and perceptions regarding their USU experiences. In addition to some general questions, the focus of this year’s survey was on general education courses, advising, and student computer use. The survey was inserted into graduation application packets. Students were asked to complete it as part of the requirements for graduation. The results reported here are based on student respondents who made application for graduation from May 2003 – May 2004. Usable surveys were obtained from 3038 students. There were 2955 students graduating with undergraduate degrees in 2004. Eighty-three more surveys were received than students who graduated. A number of respondents (276) did not report their year and term of graduation; they gave no student identification numbers to verify their date of graduation. It was decided to maintain their surveys in the data base because their surveys were turned in during the appropriate time lines. Since this is the last time that this survey will be run maintaining their feedback was important to those being evaluated. Approximately 86% of the respondents were between the ages of 21 and 30. 52.4% of the respondents were female, and 6.6% of the respondents were minority students. Among the important findings of the survey are the following: Overall Perceptions of USU

• 85.3% of the respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with the overall quality of their educations. Only 3.5% indicated dissatisfaction.

• 85% rated the teaching ability of faculty as very good or good. • When asked what they would tell their friends about USU, 83% said USU was great or at

least said mostly positive things. Only 3.1% made negative comments. General Education

• 58.8% of the respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with their general education courses. 12.9% said they were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied.

• When asked how well they felt University Studies Courses had prepared them in seven learning domains, between 88.9% and 93.1% ranked these items well or very well.

Advising

• The most important source of information for academic planning for a plurality of respondents (42.5%) was their USU Major Requirement Sheets – even more important than advisors.

• A plurality of respondents (31.3%) had met with their advisors four or more times during the last year. Only 8.9% of the respondents had not met with their advisors in the last academic year.

• Three quarters of the respondents indicated satisfaction with their advisors. 10.6% of the respondents indicated dissatisfaction.

• 62.3% of the respondents indicated satisfaction with the advising system at USU, but 17.4% indicated dissatisfaction.

• 68.7% of the respondents indicated satisfaction with the advising system in their college/department, but 15.2% indicated dissatisfaction.

Computer Facilities and Usage

• 65.8% of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed that they had not waited long for a computer in the open access computer laboratories and more than 80% said they were satisfied with the labs.

• 92.3% of the respondents said they had access to a privately-owned computer during the school year and, of those with access, 65% indicated that they used these computers for their school work most or all of the time.

2003-2004 Survey Comparison

• Most of the differences in responses between the two years were differences among colleges rather than substantial differences in total responses. Appendix B presents these comparisons in graph form.

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SURVEY OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................... 5 SURVEY ADMINISTRATION....................................................................................................... 5 RESPONDENT CHARACTERISTICS.......................................................................................... 6 FINDINGS: OVERALL PERCEPTIONS OF USU ........................................................................ 8 FINDINGS: GENERAL EDUCATION COURSES...................................................................... 10 FINDINGS: ADVISING ............................................................................................................... 12 FINDINGS: COMPUTER FACILTIES AND USAGE .................................................................. 16 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. 18 APPENDIX A: SURVEY INSTRUMENT ...................................................................................A-1 APPENDIX B: GRADUATING STUDENT SURVEY RESULTS: 2003 VS 2004 ......................B-1 APPENDIX C: FREQUENCY TABLES .....................................................................................C-1 APPENDIX D: CROSS-TABULATION TABLES .......................................................................D-1 APPENDIX E: WHAT THE USU ADVISING SYSTEM IS DOING WELL .................................E-1 APPENDIX F: HOW THE ADVISING SYSTEM NEEDS TO IMPROVE...................................F-1

1


Office of Analysis, Assessment, and Accreditation

August 2004 SURVEY OBJECTIVES Utah State University’s assessment program surveys three groups of students and former students on a regular basis—freshmen/sophomores, those applying for graduation, and alumni. The Graduating Student Survey allows evaluation of how student opinion may have changed during the undergraduate years. The freshman/sophomore survey captures the initial opinion of students as they begin their university experiences, and the alumni survey evaluates their opinions after they have had time to establish themselves in their careers. This report focuses on the results of the 2004 Graduating Student Survey. The primary objectives were to assess the attitudes and opinions of graduating students with respect to:

• Overall perceptions of USU • General Education Courses • Advising • Computer Facilities and Usage

SURVEY ADMINISTRATION Development of the Survey Instrument. Meetings were held with faculty, staff, and students to determine the appropriate scope and content of the survey instrument. In addition, nationally-normed instruments were reviewed, advising association guidelines were evaluated, and websites of other universities were searched to determine what was being done elsewhere. A draft survey instrument was submitted for review by academic advisors on the USU campus for their comments and then pilot-tested on students, who were later given the opportunity to voice their comments and concerns. The final version of the survey instrument is included in Appendix A. Sample Selection and Survey Administration. An attempt was made to survey all of the undergraduate, graduating student population. Surveys were distributed as part of the graduation application packet. All students were instructed to fill out the survey and return it with their graduation application materials. Upon payment of the graduation fee, surveys were collected by the Cashier’s Office. Data Analysis. A total of 2955 undergraduate students graduated in 2004 and 3038 usable surveys were returned. Eighty-three more surveys were received than students who graduated. A number of respondents (276) did not report their year and term of graduation; they gave no student identification numbers to verify their date of graduation. It was decided to maintain their surveys in the data base because their surveys were turned in during the appropriate time lines. Since this is the last time that this survey will be run maintaining their feedback was important to those being evaluated. These data are the basis for results found in this report.

2

RESPONDENT CHARACTERISTICS Table 1 shows demographic and other characteristics of the survey respondents. In considering college breakdowns shown in the table, it should be noted that 80 of the respondents or about 2.8% indicated “Other”. These respondents were in either Interdisciplinary Studies or International Studies. The numbers of respondents by college are as follows: Agriculture 180 Business 628 Education 539 Engineering 316 Family Life 200 HASS 663 Natural Resources 67 Science 173 Other 80 86.2% of the respondents were between the ages of 21 and 30. The colleges of Agriculture, Business, and Education tended to have more respondents who were older than those from other colleges. Overall, there were more women than men, but there was substantial variation among colleges. Forty-seven percent of the respondents said that they were married. Only 6.6% of the respondents classified themselves as minorities. This proportion is greater than that in the USU undergraduate student population, which runs about 4%. Almost 84% of the respondents reported that they were from Utah, while approximately 3% were international students. Over 66% indicated that they were working half-time or more while going to school. The most common type of career-related practical experience acquired by respondents while at USU was practicum or internship (33.4%).

3

TABLE 1. RESPONDENT CHARACTERISTICS AG BUS EDUC ENG FL HASS NR SCI OTHER TOTAL Age 18-20 years old 3.4% 4.3% 8.7% 1.9% 5.6% 4.6% 1.5% 5.4% 37.2% 5.9% 21-25 years old 67.4% 63.4% 67.3% 67.7% 81.2% 69.3% 57.6% 66.5% 39.7% 66.9% 26-30 years old 19.4% 22.4% 12.7% 25.5% 9.1% 20.6% 31.8% 21.0% 16.7% 19.3% 31-40 years old 3.4% 7.5% 5.7% 4.5% 2.5% 3.5% 6.1% 6.0% 6.4% 5.1% 41-50 years old 5.7% 1.8% 4.6% 0.3% 0.5% 1.1% 3.0% 1.2% 0.0% 2.1% 51-60+ years old 0.6% 0.5% 1.0% 0.0% 1.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% Gender Female 50.0% 38.0% 81.4% 11.3% 94.4% 55.6% 39.4% 33.7% 57.0% 52.4% Male 50.0% 62.0% 18.6% 88.7% 5.6% 44.4% 60.6% 66.3% 43.0% 47.6% Married 54.0% 52.7% 46.2% 55.7% 34.3% 40.2% 41.5% 51.8% 40.5% 47.0% U.S. Citizens 98.3% 93.1% 98.1% 94.9% 98.0% 96.2% 96.9% 94.6% 97.5% 95.9% Minority 5.7% 6.9% 4.9% 5.1% 5.7% 8.8% 11.2% 7.2% 9.0% 6.6% Geographic Origin Cache Valley 30.9% 43.6% 33.8% 54.0% 38.1% 46.4% 34.8% 50.3% 30.8% 42.2% Utah, not Cache Valley 52.6% 38.8% 52.6% 30.9% 43.3% 36.0% 50.0% 32.9% 59.0% 41.5% U.S., not Utah 14.9% 13.6% 12.5% 10.9% 16.5% 14.9% 12.1% 10.8% 7.7% 13.3% Outside the U.S. 1.7% 4.0% 1.2% 4.2% 2.1% 2.8% 3.0% 6.0% 2.6% 3.0% Working Full-time 22.2% 26.2% 12.9% 10.3% 13.8% 13.8% 7.7% 10.1% 20.5% 16.3% Three-fourths time 16.5% 17.4% 19.2% 12.9% 17.4% 17.7% 13.8% 10.7% 10.3% 16.6% Half-time 28.4% 29.7% 32.4% 38.7% 34.9% 36.7% 33.8% 38.5% 20.5% 33.5% One-fourth time 25.0% 13.4% 21.3% 23.2% 22.1% 20.5% 27.7% 22.5% 25.6% 20.3% None 8.0% 13.3% 14.2% 14.8% 11.8% 11.2% 16.9% 18.3% 23.1% 13.4% Career-Related Practical Experience Acquired During College Practicum-internship 36.2% 28.1% 46.2% 33.5% 62.9% 23.8% 18.2% 24.7% 16.2% 33.4% Volunteer experiences 14.9% 11.0% 26.1% 5.2% 14.4% 18.1% 19.7% 16.9% 17.6% 16.1% Employment 32.8% 30.3% 15.5% 29.7% 13.9% 24.5% 24.2% 25.9% 20.3% 24.4% Work-study 8.6% 4.1% 6.2% 6.1% 6.7% 6.5% 10.6% 8.4% 9.5% 6.3% None 7.5% 26.4% 6.0% 25.5% 2.1% 27.1% 27.3% 24.1% 36.5% 19.8% NOTE: Percentages are based on those responding to each question.

4

FINDINGS: OVERALL PERCEPTIONS OF USU Several questions in the survey were included to determine the general perceptions students had of USU. Results are shown in Table 2. When asked how they felt about the overall quality of their educations 28.8% of the total respondents said they were very satisfied and 56.5% said they were satisfied, a total of 85.3% for the two categories. Overall, only 3.5% indicated that they were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. In evaluating the helpfulness of faculty, only 5.2% indicated dissatisfaction. 77.1% of the respondents rated the faculty as good or very good in taking a personal interest in students. The faculty also scored high marks on teaching ability, with 85% of the respondents rating teaching as very good or good. A large majority of respondents (81.9%) felt they were treated fairly at USU. The respondents were asked what they would tell their friends about Utah State University. The choices for response were: (1) Great, come here to school, (2) Mostly positive things, (3) Nothing much, positive or negative, (4) Mostly negative things, and (5) Not great, don’t come here. Only 3.1% selected (4) or (5), while 83% said USU was great or would say at least mostly positive things about the university. Taken together, these items imply that respondents were quite satisfied with their USU experience.

5

TABLE 2. OVERALL PERCEPTIONS OF USU AG BUS EDUC ENG FL HASS NR SCI OTHER TOTAL Overall Quality of Education Very Satisfied 32.9% 22.6% 40.4% 23.2% 28.1% 27.7% 26.2% 22.4% 35.1% 28.8% Satisfied 54.1% 60.5% 50.0% 60.1% 60.5% 54.4% 52.5% 64.6% 55.4% 56.5% Neutral 9.4% 13.5% 7.9% 12.6% 8.6% 13.9% 13.1% 8.1% 6.8% 11.3% Dissatisfied 3.5% 2.8% 1.6% 4.1% 2.7% 3.5% 8.2% 5.0% 2.7% 3.2% Very Dissatisfied 0.0% 0.5% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% Helpfulness of Faculty Very Satisfied 46.1% 26.6% 42.4% 20.5% 31.5% 36.8% 29.5% 23.8% 40.5% 33.2% Satisfied 37.7% 46.3% 43.2% 52.1% 44.6% 42.6% 47.5% 45.0% 40.5% 44.6% Neutral 12.0% 20.6% 12.2% 21.9% 20.7% 15.7% 13.1% 17.5% 16.2% 17.0% Dissatisfied 4.2% 5.9% 2.2% 4.8% 2.7% 3.3% 8.2% 11.3% 2.7% 4.4% Very Dissatisfied 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.7% 0.5% 1.5% 1.6% 2.5% 0.0% 0.8% Personal Interest of Faculty in Students Very Good 43.5% 33.3% 43.9% 32.7% 41.1% 42.2% 32.8% 32.1% 45.3% 38.8% Good 34.7% 41.5% 36.4% 46.0% 39.5% 36.9% 29.5% 32.7% 32.0% 38.3% Fair 14.1% 18.2% 13.2% 15.3% 14.6% 12.8% 26.2% 22.6% 13.3% 15.5% Poor 3.5% 3.7% 3.0% 3.7% 2.7% 2.9% 8.2% 8.8% 0.0% 3.6% No Opinion 4.1% 3.3% 3.6% 2.3% 2.2% 5.2% 3.3% 3.8% 9.3% 3.9% Teaching Ability of Faculty Very Good 50.6% 39.0% 52.3% 43.0% 49.2% 46.0% 49.2% 28.3% 48.0% 44.9% Good 38.8% 44.3% 38.1% 39.0% 38.5% 38.5% 34.4% 46.5% 37.3% 40.1% Fair 5.9% 12.4% 5.7% 12.7% 8.6% 8.6% 11.5% 18.9% 8.0% 9.8% Poor 2.4% 2.1% 1.8% 2.0% 1.6% 1.3% 3.3% 2.5% 0.0% 1.8% No Opinion 2.4% 2.3% 2.2% 3.3% 2.1% 5.7% 1.6% 3.8% 6.7% 3.4% Degree to Which the Student Felt Treated Fairly Very Satisfied 47.9% 29.7% 44.2% 23.5% 31.4% 36.5% 37.7% 28.0% 40.5% 35.1% Satisfied 41.4% 49.8% 43.8% 55.3% 49.2% 44.3% 41.0% 46.0% 44.6% 46.8% Neutral 7.1% 17.3% 9.3% 17.7% 14.1% 14.8% 13.1% 18.6% 10.8% 14.1% Dissatisfied 3.0% 2.7% 2.4% 2.7% 3.2% 3.3% 4.9% 6.8% 4.1% 3.2% Very Dissatisfied 0.6% 0.5% 0.4% 0.7% 2.2% 1.0% 3.3% 0.6% 0.0% 0.8% What Would You Tell Your Friends About USU? Great, come here to school 47.4% 35.4% 49.1% 33.2% 51.5% 34.6% 26.2% 36.9% 40.3% 39.5% Mostly positive things 41.0% 46.1% 39.0% 47.1% 36.7% 46.0% 47.7% 44.6% 36.4% 43.5% Nothing much, positive 8.7% 15.5% 10.7% 14.8% 9.7% 16.0% 16.9% 14.3% 19.5% 13.9% or negative Mostly negative things 1.7% 2.4% 0.8% 3.2% 1.0% 2.2% 6.2% 3.0% 3.9% 2.1% Not great, don't come here 1.2% 0.7% 0.4% 1.6% 1.0% 1.2% 3.1% 1.2% 0.0% 1.0% NOTE: Percentages are based on those responding to each question.

6

FINDINGS: GENERAL EDUCATION COURSES General education courses are designed to enhance students’ skills in communication, mathematics, and computer literacy; they are also designed to give them the needed background in the humanities and in the social, life, and physical sciences. Students were asked how well University Studies Courses (i.e., general education) prepared them in the areas listed above. As presented in Table 3, very well responses ranged from 29.7% in life sciences to 38.5% in humanities and arts. “Well + very well ranged between 88.9% and 93.1% in all seven areas, while poor and very poor responses ranged between 6.9% and 11.1%. It should be noted that if respondents took some, but did not take all of their general education at USU, they could mark these items “Not at USU” or “Not Applicable”. Responses for these students are not included in Table 3 to reflect only those who had some or all of these experiences at USU. When asked about the overall quality of University Studies/General Education courses, over 58% of the respondents said they were satisfied or very satisfied, while 12.9% expressed dissatisfaction. When these domains are studied individually, the results as reported in the paragraph above seem to suggest that there is general satisfaction. But, when the respondents report satisfaction with the overall quality of University Studies/General Education courses, satisfaction drops. Further study is needed to see just how students perceive general education at USU.

7

TABLE 3. GENERAL EDUCATION COURSES (Students who have taken USU general education courses) OVERALL QUALITY OF UNIVERSITY STUDIES/GENERAL EDUCATION COURSES AG BUS EDUC ENG FL HASS NR SCI OTHER TOTAL Very Satisfied 14.2% 15.2% 18.3% 8.4% 13.7% 14.6% 2.1% 8.9% 29.2% 14.4% Satisfied 40.7% 47.1% 42.1% 40.6% 51.1% 42.7% 35.4% 50.0% 53.8% 44.4% Neutral 29.2% 27.1% 29.8% 34.5% 23.0% 29.2% 33.3% 24.2% 12.3% 28.3% Dissatisfied 10.6% 8.3% 7.3% 12.4% 10.8% 9.6% 20.8% 13.7% 3.1% 9.7% Very Dissatisfied 5.3% 2.2% 2.5% 4.0% 1.4% 4.0% 8.3% 3.2% 1.5% 3.2% HOW WELL HAVE UNIVERSITY STUDIES COURSE PREPARED YOU IN THE AREAS OF: COMMUNICATION Very Well 35.6% 36.4% 37.0% 23.6% 39.8% 40.5% 25.6% 30.6% 47.6% 35.8% Well 61.4% 55.9% 59.4% 65.5% 54.2% 52.2% 65.1% 59.5% 50.8% 57.3% Poorly 2.0% 6.5% 3.3% 9.1% 5.1% 5.2% 9.3% 8.1% 1.6% 5.6% Very Poorly 1.0% 1.2% 0.3% 1.8% 0.9% 2.1% 0.0% 1.8% 0.0% 1.3% QUANTITATIVE SKILLS Very Well 26.3% 35.2% 27.6% 48.7% 24.8% 24.6% 24.4% 39.4% 42.6% 32.3% Well 64.6% 57.2% 62.6% 42.0% 66.3% 59.2% 61.0% 56.1% 46.3% 57.3% Poorly 8.1% 5.6% 8.1% 7.6% 6.2% 11.4% 9.7% 2.7% 9.3% 7.8% Very Poorly 1.0% 2.0% 1.7% 1.7% 2.7% 4.8% 4.9% 1.8% 1.8% 2.6% COMPUTER LITERACY Very Well 27.1% 42.4% 33.6% 45.0% 45.9% 30.6% 34.2% 36.0% 47.3% 37.4% Well 62.6% 49.3% 58.7% 44.5% 42.6% 56.2% 50.0% 49.1% 45.5% 52.2% Poorly 9.4% 7.8% 6.5% 7.0% 8.2% 10.2% 10.5% 11.4% 3.6% 8.3% Very Poorly 0.9% 0.5% 1.2% 3.5% 3.3% 3.0% 5.3% 3.5% 3.6% 2.1% HUMANITIES AND ARTS Very Well 33.3% 29.9% 38.8% 23.7% 43.6% 57.2% 13.3% 27.1% 55.4% 38.5% Well 50.5% 58.1% 51.3% 57.8% 46.6% 37.0% 73.3% 56.8% 44.6% 50.6% Poorly 12.6% 11.3% 8.6% 15.5% 6.8% 3.7% 8.9% 10.2% 0.0% 8.8% Very Poorly 3.6% 0.7% 1.3% 3.0% 3.0% 2.1% 4.5% 5.9% 0.0% 2.1% SOCIAL SCIENCES Very Well 26.9% 30.0% 44.5% 22.5% 48.4% 45.7% 24.4% 24.1% 47.7% 36.5% Well 60.6% 61.4% 50.2% 59.5% 49.2% 48.3% 66.7% 59.8% 49.3% 54.9% Poorly 10.6% 8.6% 5.0% 14.5% 1.6% 4.2% 8.9% 12.5% 1.5% 7.3% Very Poorly 1.9% 0.0% 0.3% 3.5% 0.8% 1.8% 0.0% 3.6% 1.5% 1.3% LIFE SCIENCES Very Well 38.2% 25.4% 31.2% 27.3% 32.8% 26.8% 35.9% 39.2% 39.0% 29.7% Well 53.6% 63.7% 61.7% 59.5% 58.2% 58.9% 56.4% 46.1% 52.5% 59.2% Poorly 7.3% 9.9% 5.9% 10.9% 6.6% 11.7% 7.7% 10.8% 5.1% 9.2% Very Poorly 0.9% 1.0% 1.2% 2.3% 2.4% 2.6% 0.0% 3.9% 3.4% 1.9% PHYSICAL SCIENCES Very Well 34.6% 26.6% 29.6% 47.8% 29.7% 26.8% 37.8% 44.2% 35.7% 32.0% Well 59.6% 62.2% 62.0% 44.5% 58.7% 58.1% 53.4% 50.0% 53.6% 57.5% Poorly 5.8% 10.0% 7.1% 6.7% 8.3% 12.7% 4.4% 3.9% 8.9% 8.8%

Very Poorly 0.0% 1.2% 1.3% 1.0% 3.3% 2.4% 4.4% 1.9% 1.8% 1.7% NOTE: Percentages are based on those responding to each question.

8

FINDINGS: ADVISING The survey included a long list of questions about advising at USU, but only a subset, listed in Table 4, is presented here. When asked about their major source of information for academic planning, 42.5% of the respondents said the Major Requirement Sheets, with advisors second at 38.7%. Approximately 31% of the respondents saw their advisor four or more times during the past school year, while 39.2% saw their advisor one or two times. Only 8.9% had not seen their advisor in the past school year. The most frequently mentioned reasons for not meeting more often were that respondents felt they had already obtained the needed information from their advisor on the first visit or they obtained the information from another source. Eighty-five percent of the respondents said that the average length of advising appointments were 20 minutes or less, of those, 37.9% reported the appointments were 10 minutes or less. Over 47% of the respondents indicated that they would like to have seen their advisor more often. Approximately 23% of the respondents said they would like to meet with their advisor at least monthly, but 58% of the respondents preferred no more visits than once per semester or less. Over two-thirds of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed that their advisor was readily available for consultation. Over 86% said their advisor was friendly and 75% said their advisor did not make them feel rushed during meetings. 72% felt that their advisor gave them correct information. Over 78% of the respondents said their advisors gave them advice in a straight-forward understandable manner. A little over 76% of the respondents said their advisors were prepared for appointments with appropriate transcripts and degree requirement sheets. Respondents marking “Not Applicable” were removed from Table 4 in order to more accurately reflect student perceptions. When asked to respond to the statement, “Overall, I am satisfied with my advisor,” 76.1% strongly agreed or agreed and 10.6% disagreed or strongly disagreed. Given a similar statement about USU’s advising system in general, agreed plus strongly agree dropped to 62.3% and 17.4% said they disagreed or strongly disagreed. Over 68% of the respondents strongly agreed or agreed they were satisfied with the advising system in their department/college, while 15.2% disagreed or strongly disagreed. The items on advising suggest that respondents are not completely unhappy with advising at USU, but satisfaction is low enough to show a need for improvement.

9

TABLE 4. ADVISING AG BUS EDUC ENG FL HASS NR SCI OTHER TOTAL Student's Major Source of Information for Academic Planning Advisor 56.4% 32.2% 57.0% 28.8% 35.9% 33.2% 34.8% 23.2% 56.8% 38.7% Other faculty/staff 1.7% 4.0% 4.3% 12.7% 5.2% 8.5% 7.6% 6.0% 8.1% 6.3% USU Catalog 5.8% 4.5% 2.3% 2.6% 3.1% 6.6% 1.5% 8.3% 2.7% 4.5% Major Requirements Sheets 32.0% 52.3% 28.9% 43.1% 44.3% 45.4% 47.0% 52.4% 24.3% 42.5% Other Students 2.3% 3.8% 5.1% 10.1% 8.9% 3.5% 4.5% 6.5% 0.0% 5.0% Other 1.7% 3.2% 2.3% 2.6% 2.6% 2.8% 4.5% 3.6% 8.1% 2.9% Number of Times Student Met with Advisor During the Past School Year Zero 2.3% 7.7% 3.5% 29.2% 5.2% 6.1% 3.0% 13.8% 14.9% 8.9% One 12.1% 16.4% 10.8% 19.7% 17.0% 22.0% 7.6% 15.6% 8.1% 16.3% Two 20.2% 25.7% 22.5% 19.7% 24.2% 23.7% 24.2% 20.4% 16.2% 22.9% Three 24.3% 21.3% 21.1% 13.1% 25.3% 21.9% 18.2% 13.8% 27.0% 20.6% Four or more 41.1% 28.9% 42.1% 18.3% 28.3% 26.3% 47.0% 36.4% 33.8% 31.3% If There Were No Obstacles I Would Visit My Advisor More Frequently Yes 36.6% 45.9% 52.8% 44.9% 50.3% 49.9% 43.1% 32.7% 64.8% 47.4% No 63.4% 54.1% 47.2% 55.1% 49.7% 50.1% 56.9% 67.3% 35.2% 52.6% Number of Times Students Would Like to Have Met with Advisor Weekly 2.4% 1.3% 3.0% 1.3% 0.5% 4.3% 4.5% 1.2% 4.1% 2.5% Every other week 1.8% 3.3% 3.1% 1.6% 1.6% 2.7% 4.5% 3.0% 2.7% 2.7% Monthly 16.6% 15.2% 22.2% 13.4% 22.0% 19.4% 30.3% 11.3% 28.8% 18.4% Every couple months 23.1% 15.9% 23.6% 15.1% 19.4% 17.7% 13.6% 16.7% 17.8% 18.4% Each semester 46.7% 49.3% 41.1% 49.5% 48.2% 43.6% 39.4% 45.8% 35.6% 45.4% Once a year 7.7% 11.9% 4.3% 12.5% 5.8% 9.3% 6.1% 18.5% 5.5% 9.3% Never 1.8% 3.0% 2.6% 6.6% 2.6% 3.0% 1.5% 3.6% 5.5% 3.3% Average Length of Advising Appointments 1-10 minutes 33.3% 50.8% 30.5% 42.5% 29.7% 34.4% 13.6% 47.3% 28.2% 37.9% 11-20 minutes 45.4% 41.3% 55.5% 42.2% 49.5% 48.4% 48.5% 43.8% 50.7% 47.2% 21-30 minutes 20.1% 7.1% 12.0% 11.6% 19.3% 12.8% 18.2% 8.3% 18.3% 12.2% More than 30 minutes 1.1% 0.8% 2.0% 3.7% 1.6% 4.4% 19.7% 0.6% 2.8% 2.8% Reasons Why Student Did Not Meet With Advisor More than Once Not necessary 11.1% 14.7% 3.8% 24.4% 7.7% 18.9% 28.6% 18.6% 20.7% 16.2% Got info on first visit 41.7% 30.7% 27.8% 21.0% 41.0% 29.7% 28.6% 20.9% 17.2% 28.6% Got info from other source 11.1% 22.5% 12.7% 36.1% 25.6% 25.9% 0.0% 32.6% 34.5% 24.9% Don't know who advisor is 0.0% 7.8% 6.3% 5.9% 7.7% 9.2% 0.0% 7.0% 6.9% 7.2% Advisor kept me informed 30.6% 18.3% 34.2% 4.2% 12.8% 8.1% 42.9% 2.3% 17.2% 14.8% Advisor was not helpful 5.6% 6.0% 15.2% 8.4% 5.1% 8.1% 0.0% 18.6% 3.4% 8.3%

10

AG BUS ED ENG FL HASS NR SCI OTHER TOTAL Advisor Was Readily Available for Consultation Strongly Agree 44.3% 29.1% 31.1% 14.2% 13.3% 36.3% 36.5% 32.9% 36.6% 30.0% Agree 31.6% 44.4% 39.6% 27.1% 46.8% 36.7% 38.1% 39.0% 31.0% 38.3% Neutral 15.5% 17.1% 17.4% 29.9% 22.9% 19.3% 19.0% 18.9% 18.3% 19.6% Disagree 6.9% 7.0% 7.9% 19.1% 12.8% 5.6% 6.3% 6.7% 9.9% 8.6% Strongly Disagree 1.7% 2.4% 4.0% 9.7% 4.2% 2.1% 0.0% 2.5% 4.2% 3.5% Advisor is Friendly Toward Me Strongly Agree 56.9% 50.3% 58.8% 39.1% 35.1% 62.4% 66.7% 46.7% 72.2% 53.6% Agree 34.5% 35.6% 31.0% 38.1% 37.8% 29.0% 27.0% 34.5% 26.4% 33.0% Neutral 6.3% 11.2% 7.3% 14.3% 17.5% 6.5% 3.2% 10.3% 1.4% 9.3% Disagree 1.7% 1.4% 1.4% 6.1% 8.0% 1.1% 3.2% 5.5% 0.0% 2.6% Strongly Disagree 0.6% 1.5% 1.5% 2.4% 1.6% 1.0% 0.0% 3.0% 0.0% 1.5% My Advisor Does Not Make Me Feel Rushed During Our Meetings Strongly Agree 43.7% 29.9% 44.0% 20.6% 24.7% 43.0% 46.0% 33.3% 64.3% 36.7% Agree 34.5% 44.0% 39.0% 35.8% 38.7% 35.5% 38.1% 41.2% 24.3% 38.4% Neutral 14.9% 16.5% 11.0% 26.2% 23.1% 14.0% 12.7% 12.1% 8.6% 15.7% Disagree 5.7% 7.1% 4.0% 11.4% 9.7% 5.4% 1.6% 7.3% 2.8% 6.4% Strongly Disagree 1.1% 2.5% 2.0% 6.0% 3.8% 2.1% 1.6% 6.1% 0..0% 2.8% My Advisor Gives Me Correct Information on Services/Programs Strongly Agree 41.5% 29.8% 39.3% 25.3% 25.2% 41.4% 35.6% 34.0% 50.0% 35.1% Agree 37.8% 37.5% 38.0% 37.3% 40.2% 35.3% 32.2% 34.6% 35.9% 36.9% Neutral 12.1% 21.9% 16.1% 29.4% 19.0% 17.1% 27.1% 22.2% 14.1% 19.6% Disagree 3.7% 5.2% 3.9% 5.7% 8.9% 3.8% 3.4% 3.3% 0.0% 4.6% Strongly Disagree 4.9% 5.6% 2.7% 2.3% 6.7% 2.4% 1.7% 5.9% 0.0% 3.8% My Advisor Gives Me Advice in a Straight- Forward and Understandable Manner Strongly Agree 48.5% 34.3% 43.1% 30.8% 29.0% 46.5% 45.2% 32.7% 69.6% 40.1% Agree 35.1% 38.2% 40.2% 43.9% 39.3% 35.3% 35.5% 43.4% 24.6% 38.3% Neutral 7.6% 19.3% 12.2% 18.7% 22.4% 14.6% 12.9% 15.7% 5.8% 15.5% Disagree 4.7% 4.0% 3.1% 4.4% 6.0% 1.8% 6.5% 4.4% 0.0% 3.5% Strongly Disagree 4.1% 4.2% 1.4% 2.2% 3.3% 1.8% 0.0% 3.8% 0.0% 2.6% My Advisor Is Prepared For Appointments With Appropriate Transcripts and Degree Requirement Sheets Strongly Agree 47.1% 32.5% 44.6% 26.9% 39.2% 42.7% 32.3% 25.9% 65.7% 38.5% Agree 37.0% 42.0% 39.5% 40.7% 38.2% 33.7% 29.0% 35.8% 25.7% 37.7% Neutral 11.8% 19.2% 11.9% 24.4% 14.5% 16.2% 29.0% 22.9% 8.6% 17.0% Disagree 2.3% 4.0% 2.4% 5.8% 5.4% 4.7% 8.1% 11.7% 0.0% 4.6% Strongly Disagree 1.8% 2.3% 1.6% 2.2% 2.7% 2.7% 1.6% 3.7% 0.0% 2.2% Overall I Am Satisfied With My Advisor Strongly Agree 60.5% 36.0% 51.4% 25.2% 29.8% 19.9% 56.5% 41.6% 69.6% 43.8% Agree 23.2% 37.8% 31.3% 35.7% 35.1% 31.5% 25.8% 26.7% 23.2% 32.3% Neutral 5.8% 16.0% 9.1% 23.1% 15.9% 11.3% 11.3% 14.9% 5.8% 13.3% Disagree 6.4% 4.5% 4.0% 10.1% 9.6% 4.3% 4.8% 6.9% 0.0% 5.5% Strongly Disagree 4.1% 5.7% 4.2% 5.9% 9.6% 3.0% 1.6% 9.9% 1.4% 5.1%

11

AG BUS ED ENG FL HASS NR SCI OTHER TOTAL Overall I Am Satisfied with the Advising System at USU Strongly Agree 35.1% 26.1% 39.8% 15.9% 18.6% 30.7% 32.8% 20.4% 48.6% 29.0% Agree 34.5% 35.5% 33.3% 31.8% 33.5% 33.2% 32.8% 29.0% 27.1% 33.3% Neutral 12.3% 21.2% 15.3% 27.0% 22.9% 21.1% 19.7% 25.9% 14.3% 20.3% Disagree 12.9% 9.3% 6.7% 15.9% 16.0% 8.0% 4.9% 11.7% 5.7% 9.9% Strongly Disagree 5.2% 7.9% 4.9% 9.4% 9.0% 7.0% 9.8% 13.0% 4.3% 7.5% Overall, I Am Satisfied with the Advising System in my College/Department Strongly Agree 47.7% 28.0% 45.8% 19.0% 23.4% 40.7% 43.5% 27.0% 55.7% 35.4% Agree 32.5% 37.2% 33.3% 32.9% 34.6% 32.0% 33.9% 26.4% 28.6% 33.3% Neutral 9.3% 18.6% 11.6% 23.9% 18.6% 14.2% 11.3% 22.7% 11.4% 16.1% Disagree 6.4% 8.2% 5.1% 15.6% 11.2% 8.0% 9.7% 9.8% 1.4% 8.4% Strongly Disagree 4.1% 8.0% 4.2% 8.6% 12.2% 5.1% 1.6% 14.1% 2.9% 6.8% NOTE: Percentages are based on those responding to each question.

12

FINDINGS: COMPUTER FACILITIES AND USAGE Another focus of this study was to survey student opinion about the open access computer laboratories at USU. As shown in Table 5, 65.8% agreed or strongly agreed that they did not have to wait long for a computer. A similar proportion of respondents (62.9%) indicated that lab consultants provided them with the help that they needed. Approximately 82% of the respondents expressed overall satisfaction with the open access labs. When asked whether they received good value for their computer fee, 62.7% agreed or strongly agreed. Respondents marking “Not Applicable” were removed from Table 5 in order to reflect only those respondents who had experience with the USU computer labs. Several questions focused on whether students had access to privately-owned computers while they were at USU. A total of 92.3% of the respondents had access to one or more privately owned computers. 65% of the respondents who had access to these privately owned computers used these computers most or all of the time to meet their computer needs. The data suggest that in planning expansions to open access computer laboratories, the availability of privately-owned computers should be carefully considered.

13

TABLE 5. COMPUTER FACILITIES AND USAGE AG BUS EDUC ENG FL HASS NR SCI OTHER TOTAL I Don't Wait Long for an Available Computer in the Lab Strongly Agree 19.7% 23.9% 26.1% 15.9% 24.6% 21.2% 16.7% 11.8% 25.4% 21.6% Agree 43.0% 45.7% 41.3% 52.4% 38.8% 43.2% 38.9% 45.1% 42.9% 44.2% Neutral 21.8% 20.0% 19.0% 21.0% 20.6% 19.6% 29.6% 23.5% 22.2% 20.5% Disagree 14.1% 7.2% 11.0% 8.3% 13.7% 10.8% 11.1% 15.7% 6.3% 10.4% Strong Disagree 1.4% 3.2% 2.6% 2.4% 2.3% 5.2% 3.7% 3.9% 3.2% 3.3% Lab Consultant Provide Me the Help I Need Strongly Agree 19.4% 23.7% 28.3% 15.3% 26.9% 25.8% 18.8% 19.2% 30.7% 23.9% Agree 41.8% 38.5% 39.3% 40.1% 35.1% 39.8% 28.3% 39.7% 40.3% 39.0% Neutral 27.6% 27.8% 22.8% 29.6% 30.4% 23.5% 45.3% 27.2% 17.7% 26.3% Disagree 7.5% 6.9% 7.8% 9.8% 5.3% 7.5% 3.8% 9.3% 9.7% 7.6% Strong Disagree 3.7% 3.1% 1.8% 5.2% 2.3% 3.4% 3.8% 4.6% 1.6% 3.2% Overall, I Am Satisfied with the Open Access Labs Strongly Agree 28.2% 33.6% 38.3% 21.2% 37.2% 30.7% 18.2% 22.1% 33.3% 31.2% Agree 57.0% 52.2% 45.0% 58.4% 48.0% 47.3% 58.2% 55.2% 47.6% 50.6% Neutral 9.2% 10.7% 13.4% 16.0% 11.4% 16.7% 18.2% 14.9% 12.7% 13.7% Disagree 5.6% 2.6% 2.4% 3.4% 2.3% 3.4% 1.8% 3.9% 6.4% 3.2% Strong Disagree 0.0% 0.9% 0.9% 1.0% 1.1% 1.9% 3.6% 3.9% 0.0% 1.3% I Received Good Value for My Computer Fee Strongly Agree 20.8% 23.4% 26.8% 19.1% 24.5% 22.6% 13.3% 13.0% 32.3% 22.4% Agree 33.3% 41.7% 36.7% 46.1% 40.7% 39.5% 41.7% 44.2% 38.7% 40.3% Neutral 29.9% 23.8% 22.9% 21.8% 19.2% 21.3% 21.7% 31.2% 19.3% 23.1% Disagree 9.7% 7.0% 8.4% 7.9% 10.1% 12.0% 13.3% 7.1% 9.7% 9.1% Strong Disagree 6.3% 4.1% 5.2% 5.1% 8.5% 4.6% 10.0% 4.5% 0.0% 5.1% Number of Privately Owned Computers the Student Had Access to During the Year None 13.5% 6.2% 7.4% 7.0% 6.5% 8.7% 9.8% 7.5% 4.0% 7.7% One 51.2% 49.1% 56.8% 52.7% 57.0% 54.1% 59.0% 50.3% 48.0% 53.1% Two 26.5% 31.1% 25.1% 28.3% 24.7% 25.8% 21.3% 26.7% 30.7% 27.2% Three or more 8.8% 13.5% 10.7% 12.0% 11.8% 11.4% 9.8% 15.5% 17.3% 12.0% For Students Who Had Access, How Often Did They Use the Privately Owned Computer(s) Never 0.7% 2.2% 2.2% 4.3% 0.6% 2.6% 3.6% 1.4% 0.0% 2.3% Sometimes 40.3% 31.6% 31.7% 35.6% 29.0% 32.5% 41.8% 29.2% 33.8% 32.8% Most of the time 40.3% 44.1% 44.2% 38.5% 37.3% 40.9% 36.4% 43.1% 44.1% 41.8% All of the time 18.7% 22.1% 21.9% 21.6% 33.1% 24.1% 18.2% 26.4% 22.1% 23.2%

NOTE: Percentages are based on those responding to each question.

14

SUMMARY Based on the survey results, graduating respondents seem to have overall perceptions that are positive of USU. They also seem to be generally satisfied with University Studies courses and open access computer labs. Respondents seem to feel they are getting adequate advising information to plan their programs. Although the questions regarding advising did not elicit a high proportion of negative responses, there are indications that advising at USU still needs improvement. The raw data for all items in this study appear as appendices on the web site for Analysis, Assessment, and Accreditation. These appendices include frequency tables and cross-tabulations (by college). This report and all appendices can be accessed at: http://aaa.usu.edu/FactsFigures/surveys.asp

Appendix A

Survey Instrument

1. Student ID numbers are needed to relate these and other university data for purposes of university-level assessment. In order to maintain data integrity we request that you enter this unique number.

- -2. What is your college and major? (If you have a double/dual major indicate both colleges and major. Be sure to mark the appropriate college " " as well as your major.)

Please Indicate the term and year forwhich you applied for graduation.

SummerFallSpring

To better meet the needs of students, we ask that you take a few minutes to complete this survey. Returning this survey isrequired to process your graduation application. Respond to each item by filling in the "O" that is applicable and please fillin each "O" completely. Return this survey to the Cashier's Office when you pay your graduation fees. We appreciate yourhelp.

Social Sciences

Graduating Student Survey

Agriculture Business Education Engineering

Family Life

Humanities, Arts & Natural Resources Science

Other

AgribusinessAgricultural EconomicsAgricultural EducationAgricultural Machinery TechAgricultural Systems TechAnimal ScienceApplied EconomicsBioveterinary ScienceBiometeorologyCrop ScienceDairy ScienceEcologyEconomicsEnviro Soil/Water ScienceFood Microbiology & SafetyHorticultureInternational AgribusinessNutrition and Food SciencesOrnamental HorticulturePlant ScienceSoil ScienceToxicologyVoTech Dairy Herdsman

AccountingBusinessBusiness AdministrationBusiness EducationBISBISECommunity Economic DevelopmentEducationEconomicsFinanceHuman Resource MgtInformation TechnologyManagementMarketingMarketing EducationMaster of Business AdministrationOffice Systems SupportProduction ManagementSocial Sciences

Communicative Disorders & Deaf Ed

Early Childhood Education

Education

Elementary Education

Health Education Specialist

Health, Physical Ed & Rec

Information Technology

Instructional Technology

Parks and Recreation

Physical Education

Psychology

Rehabilitation CounselingSecondary EducationSpecial Education

AeronauticsAerospace EngineeringBiological EngineeringBiological & Agricultural EngineeringCivil & Environmental EngineeringCivil EngineeringComputer EngineeringDraftingElectrical EngineeringEnvironmental EngineeringIndustrial Teacher EducationIndustrial TechnologyInformation TechnologyIrrigation EngineeringIT (Aero Technology)IT (Electronics/Computer Tech)IT (Flight Tech)IT (Welding Engineering Tech)Manufacturing EngineeringMechanical Engineering

Apparel and TextilesEarly Childood Education

Family & Consumer Sciences

Family & Consumer Sciences Education

Family & Human Development

Family Life

Food Microbiology & Safety

Human Environments

Interior DesignNutrition and Food Sciences

American StudiesAnthropologyArtAsian StudiesCommunicationEnglishFrenchGermanHistoryInternational RelationsJournalismLandscape ArchitectureLiberal Arts and SciencesMusicMusic TherapyPhilosophyPolitical SciencePrelawSecond Language TeachingSocial SciencesSocial WorkSociologySpanishTheatre ArtsTown and Regional Planning

Ecology

Environmental Studies

Fisheries Biology

Fisheries and Wildlife

Forestry

Geography

Natural Resources

Rangeland Resources

Range Science

Rec Resources Mgt

Watershed Science

Wildlife Biology

BiologyBiochemistryChemistryChemistry TeachingComp Teach -- Biological ScienceComp Teach -- Earth ScienceComp Teach -- Math/CS/StatComp Teach -- Physical Sci (Chem)Comp Teach -- Physical Sci (Physics)Computer ScienceEcologyGeologyIndustrial MathematicsInformation TechnologyLiberal Arts and SciencesMathematicsMathematics EducationMathematical SciencesPhysicsPhysics TeachingPublic HealthStatisticsToxicology

Interdisciplinary StudiesInternational Studies

Other

7644396425

FacEval

tmurray

A-1

Did not think it was necessaryGot the information I wanted/

Got the information I wanted /

Did not know who my advisor wasMy advisor kept me informed

Did not get information I wanted/

Demographics:

3. What was your cumulative GPA the last semester you were enrolled at USU?

4.0 - 3.63.5 - 3.13.0 - 2.62.5 - 2.0

4. What is the degree you are receiving?

CertificateAssociateBachelorsMastersDoctorate

5. Gender:FemaleMale

6. Citizenship:USOther

7. Ethnicity (Only answer if you are a US citizen):

American Indian or Alaskan NativeHispanicAsian or Pacific IslanderWhite, Non-hispanicBlack, Non-hispanicOther, unspecified

8. Marital Status:SingleMarriedDivorcedWidowedSeparated

9. How many dependents do you have?

Zero12345 +

10. Your age (in years):18 - 2021 - 2526 - 3031 - 4041 - 5051 - 6060 +

11. Where do you live when NOT attending USU?

Cache ValleyUtah, outside Cache ValleyOutside Utah in USOutside the USA

12. How long did you attend USU (in years)?

<1123456 +

14. Do you plan to continue your education?

YesNoUndecided

15. What is your current employment status?

Employed full-timeEmployed part-timeUnemployed

16. Typically, how much time did you work while attending USU?

None1/4 time1/2 time3/4 timeFull-time

19. What do you tell your friends about Utah State University?

It's great; come here to schoolMostly positive thingsNothing much, positive or negativeMostly negative thingsIt's not great; don't come here to school

13. I have taken the majority of my classes at:

Another college/universityLogan CampusOther USU locations (e.g. Moab, Roosevelt)

17. If you are employed, are you working in a job...

related to your degree?unrelated to your degree?

18. Indicate the type of career-related practical experience you acquired during college. (Mark all that apply):

Practicum/internshipVolunteer experiencesEmploymentWork-studyNone

Advising:From the insert provided, write down the fourdigit code of the academic advisor that youare evaluating in the following questions:

If the name of your academic advisor isnot on the insert please provide his/hername

If you have never met with your advisoror only met with him/her once indicatethe reason(s), (mark all that apply):

needed on the first visit

needed from another source

through e-mail or other sources

How many semesters hasthis person been assignedas your advisor?

1 semester2 semesters3 semesters4 semesters5+ semesters

How many times have youformally changed your major?

Never1 time2 times3 times4+ times

If there were no obstacles I wouldvisit my advisor more frequently

Yes No

In an ideal system I could makean appointment to meet myadvisor

1 hour in advance1 day in advance1 week in advance

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

needed so did not return 6885396421

tmurray

A-2

How often did you meet with youradvisor this past school year?

Indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with each of thefollowing statements about the advisor whose code (or name) youwrote above.

Strongly AgreeAgree

NeutralDisagree

Strongly Disagree

Agreement...

My Advisor:

Never1 time

2 times

3 times

4 times

5 times

6 times7 times

8 times

9 times

10+ timesWhat is the averge length of youradvising appointments?

1-10 minutes11-20 minutes21-30 minutes30 or more minutes

Not Applicable

Is friendly toward meDemonstrates interest in my welfareIs readily available for consultationIs easy to get an appointment withDoes not make me feel rushed during ourmeetingsIs prepared for appointments with appropiratetranscripts and degree requirement analysesCommunicates his/her advice effectivelyListens well to my concernsUnderstands my need for adviceHelps me clarify career and life goalsRefers me to resources that help me clarifycareer and life goalsHelps me understand my interests and abilitiesHelps me evaluate my interests and abilitiesKeeps my interests and abilities in mind whenhelping me choose courses/programsHelps me develop my decision making skillsHelps me with realistic self-appraisalHelps me develop suitable educationalgoals/plansHelps me evaluate my progress toward myestablished educational goals/plansHelps me make academic/career decisionsHelps me to successfully manage my timeHelps me overcome educational problems andskill deficienciesRefers me to resources that can help meovercome educational problems and skilldeficiencies

Refers me to resources pertinent to myeducational goals (internship, study abroad,honors program, and learning assistanceprograms)Encourages me to participate in experienceswhich lead to my intellectual growthHelps me select appropriate courses and othereducational experiencesInterprets institutional requirements so that theyare understandable to meGives me correct information onservices/programsIs well informed about changes in academicrequirements and keeps me informed ofpertinent changesGives me advice in a straight forwardunderstandable mannerTells me why she/he offers particular adviceEncourages me to participate in extracurricularactivitiesAppears to be well trainedInteractions with my advisor are positiveI don't have to wait long between scheduling andseeing my advisorOverall I am satisfied with the advising system atUSUOverall I am satisfied with the advising system inmy college/departmentOverall I am satisfied with my advisor

Not Applicable

If there were no obstacles I wouldvisit with my advisor

Weekly

Every other week

Monthly

Every couple of months

Each semester

Once a year

Never

From where do you obtain the major sourceof information to plan your academicprogram? (Choose only one)

AdvisorOther faculty/staffUSU General CatalogMajor requirement sheetsOther students

Other

What is the USU advising system doing well?

How might the advising system be improved?

Strongly DisagreeDisagree

NeutralAgree

Strongly Agree

27.

28.

29. 30.

31.

32.

33.34.35.36.37.

38.

39.40.41.42.43.

44.45.46.

47.48.49.

50.

51.52.53.

54.

Strongly AgreeAgree

NeutralDisagree

Strongly Disagree

55.

56.

57.

58.

59.

60.

61.

62.63.

64.65.66.

67.

68.

69.

4185396422

FacEval

tmurray

A-3

93. Overall quality of education 94. Overall quality of the program in your major 95. Variety of courses in your major 96. Challenge of courses in your major 97. Accessibility of faculty 98. Helpfulness of faculty 99. The degree to which you were treated fairly

During appointment(s) with your advisor, which of the following topics have you discussed? (Mark all that apply). Indicate your satisfaction with the discussion.

Satisfaction

DissatisfiedVery Dissatisfied

NeutralSatisfied

Very Satisfied

Preparation: In part, higher education is meant to prepareyou in a number of general educational domains; how well doyou feel the University Studies Program has prepared you in the following domains: (If you took most or all of your general education courses at another institution mark "Not at USU," or if you were not required to take the general education courses in your major, mark "Not Applicable".

What is your impression of USU in the following areas?

110. Undergraduate programs111. Your major department112. Teaching ability of faculty113. Personal interest of faculty in students114. Quality of students115. Research activities116. Public relations

Courses for the semesterDegree requirementsMajor requirementsMinor requirementsGeneral Education requirementsSelecting or changing your majorTransfer creditRegistration procedures (drop/add, closed courses)Academic probationCareer choiceInternshipsResearch with facultyHow to get the most out of your educationalexperience at USUStudy skillsConcerns about a specific courseConcerns about a specific faculty memberApplication to graduate/professional schoolsPersonal problemsCredit by examination (CLEP)Advanced Placement (AP) coursesWork study/on-campus employmentJob placement after graduationWithdrawing from USU

103. Communication104. Numeracy105. Computer Literacy106. Humanities and Art107. Social Science108. Life Science109. Physical Science

Not at USU

Very PoorlyPoorly

WellVery Well

Not Applicable

PoorFair

GoodVery Good

No Opinion

Your USU Computer Fee helps to fund: the operation of eleven open access computer labs, your email account at cc.usu.edu, internet access via modem or dorm_ip, maintenance/ replacement of the registration server, and assistive technology support. Indicate theextent to which you agree or disagree with eachof the following statements:

The open access labs had the software I neededLab consultants provided the help I neededI didn't wait long for an available computer in the labOverall, I was satisfied with the open access labsOverall, I was satisfied with my USU email accountOverall, I was satisfied with the USU modem accessOverall, I was satisfied with the dorm internet accessI received good value for my Computer fee

I used the internet address webmail.usu.edu to read myUSU email

NeverSometimes

Most of the timeAll of the time

Indicate the number of privately owned computers you hadregular access to during the past year.

None1 computer

2 computers3+ computers

If you answered 1 - 3+ computers above, how often did youuse this (these) privately owned computer(s) to do yourschool work?

NeverSometimes


I had regular access during the past year to a USUcomputer, not in an open access lab. (e.g., lab for studentsin a course or in a major).

Yes No

If you answered yes to the above question, how often did youuse this computer to do your school work?

NeverSometimes


To what extent were you satisfied with the following?

If you took most or all of your General Education at USU, indicateyour satisfaction with the following:

Overall quality of University Studies/General EducationcoursesVariety of courses in University Studies/GeneraleducationChallenge of courses in University Studies/Generaleducation

Strongly AgreeAgree

NeutralDisagree

Strongly DisagreeNot Applicable

70.71.72.73.74.75.76.77.78.79.80.81.82.

83.84.85.86.87.88.89.90.91.92.

100.

101.

102.

117.118.119.120.121.122.123.124.

125.

126.

127.

128.

129.

3598396429

tmurray

A-4

Appendix B

Graduating Student Survey 2003 -2004 Comparison Graphs

APPENDIX B. Graduating Student Survey 2003 -2004 Comparison Graphs

Graph 1. Age

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

18-20years old

21-25years old

26-30years old

31-40years old

41-50years old

51-60+years old

20032004

Graph 2. Gender

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Female Male

20032004

Graph 3. Number of Married Students

46%

46%

47%

47%

48%

48%

49%

49%

50%

50%

Married

20032004

Graph 4. Number of Minority Students

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

10%

Minority

20032004

B - 1

Graph 5. Geographic Origin

0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%

Cache Valley Utah, notCache Valley

U.S., not Utah Outside theU.S.

20032004

Graph 6. Amount of Time Student Worked

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Full-time Three-fourths time

Half-time One-fourthtime

Notworking

20032004

Graph 7. Career-related Practical Experience

0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%

Practicum/internship Volunteer experiences Employment

Work-study

None

20032004

Graph 8. Overall Quality of Education

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

VerySatisfied

Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied

VeryDissatisfied

20032004

B - 2

Graph 9. Helpfulness of Faculty

0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%

VerySatisfied

Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied

VeryDissatisfied

20032004

Graph 10. Personal Interest of Faculty in Students

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

Very Good Good Fair Poor No Opinion

20032004

Graph 11. Teaching Ability of Faculty

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Very Good Good Fair Poor No Opinion

2003

2004

Graph 12. Degree To Which Students Felt Treated Fairly

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied

2003

2004

B - 3

Graph 13. What Students Tell Friends About USU

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Great, come here toschool

Mostly positive things Nothing much, positive or negative Mostly negative things Not great, don't comehere

2003

2004

Graph 14. Overall Quality of General Education

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Very satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied

2003

2004

Graph 15. Preparation: Communication

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Very well Well Poorly Very poorly

2003

2004

Graph 16. Preparation: Quantitative Skills

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


2003

2004

B - 4

Graph 17. Preparation: Computer Literacy

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%


2003

2004

Graph 18. Preparation: Humanities and Arts

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%


2003

2004

Graph 19. Preparation: Social Sciences

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%


2003

2004

Graph 20. Preparation: Life Sciences

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


2003

2004

B - 5

Graph 21. Preparation: Physical Sciences

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


2003

2004

Graph 22. Major Source of Information for Academic Planning

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Advisor

Other faculty/staff

USU Catalog

USU Major Requirement Sheets

Other Students

Other

2003

2004

Series3

Graph 23. Number of Times Student Met With Advisorin Past School Year

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Zero One Two Three Four or more

2003

2004

Graph 24. Would Student Like To Visit With Advisor More If There Were No Obstacles

44%

45%

46%

47%

48%

49%

50%

51%

52%

53%

Yes No

2003

2004

B - 6

Graph 25. Number of Times Student Would Like ToHave Met With Advisor

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Weekly

Every other week

Monthly

Every couple of months

Once per semester

Once a year

Never

2003

2004

Graph 26. Length of Advising Appointments

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

1-10 minutes 11-20 minutes 21-30 minutes More than 30 minutes

2003

2004

Graph 27. Reasons Why Student Did Not Meet With Advisor More Than Once

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Not necessary

Got info first visit

Got info from another source

Did not know advisor

Advisor kept me informed

Advisor not helpful

2003

2004

Graph 28. Advisor Was Readily Available for Consultation

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree

2003

2004

B - 7

Graph 29. Advisor Is Friendly Toward Me

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%


2003

2004

Graph 30. Advisor Does Not Make Me Feel RushedDruing Appointments

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%


2003

2004

Graph 31. Advisor Gives Me CorrectInformation On Services/Programs

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%


2003

2004

Graph 32. Advisor Gives Me Advice in a Straight-forwardand Understandable Manner

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%


2003

2004

B - 8

Graph 33. Advisor Is Prepared for Appointments

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%


2003

2004

Graph 34. Overall I Am Satisfied With My Advisor

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%


2003

2004

Graph 35. Overall I Am Satisfied With TheAdvising System at USU

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%


2003

2004

Graph 36. Overall I Am Satisfied With The AdvisingSystem in My College/Department

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Stronlgly disagree

2003

2004

B - 9

Graph 37. I Don't Wait Long For AnAvailable Compuer in the Lab

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strong disagree

2003

2004

Graph 38. Lab Consultant Provides Me The Help Needed

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%


2003

2004

Graph 39. Overall, I Am Satisfied With TheOpen Access Computer Labs

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%


2003

2004

Graph 40. I Received Good Value for my Computer Fee

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%


2003

2004

B - 10

Graph 41. Number of Privately Owned ComputersStudent Had Access To During the Year

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

None One Two Three or more

2003

2004

Graph 42. For Students Who Had Access, How Often They Used Privately Owned Computer for School Work

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Never Sometimes Most of the time All of the time

2003

2004

B - 11

Appendix C

Frequency Tables

Appendix C: Frequency Tables Graduating Student Survey 2004

Table 1. College

180 5.9 6.3 6.3628 20.7 22.1 28.4539 17.7 18.9 47.3316 10.4 11.1 58.4200 6.6 7.0 65.5663 21.8 23.3 88.8

67 2.2 2.4 91.1173 5.7 6.1 97.2

80 2.6 2.8 100.02846 93.7 100.0

192 6.33038 100.0

AgricultureBusinessEducationEngineeringFamily LifeHASSNatural ResourcesScienceOtherTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent

Table 2. Agriculture

2860 94.1 94.1 94.119 .6 .6 94.8

6 .2 .2 95.02 .1 .1 95.04 .1 .1 95.2

15 .5 .5 95.79 .3 .3 96.02 .1 .1 96.02 .1 .1 96.12 .1 .1 96.11 .0 .0 96.2

64 2.1 2.1 98.32 .1 .1 98.4

28 .9 .9 99.3

16 .5 .5 99.84 .1 .1 99.92 .1 .1 100.0

3038 100.0 100.0

AgribusinessAgricultural EducationAgricultural Mach TechAgricultural Systems TechAnimal ScienceBioveterinary ScienceCrop ScienceDairy ScienceEconomicsEnviro SOil/Water ScienceHorticultureInternational AgribusinessNutritiona nd FoodSciencesOrnamental HorticulturePlant ScienceSoil ScienceTotal

ValidFrequency Percent Valid Percent

CumulativePercent

C - 1

Table 3. Business

2396 78.9 78.9 78.9141 4.6 4.6 83.5

98 3.2 3.2 86.73 .1 .1 86.8

27 .9 .9 87.747 1.5 1.5 89.3

7 .2 .2 89.566 2.2 2.2 91.7

2 .1 .1 91.754 1.8 1.8 93.558 1.9 1.9 95.4

4 .1 .1 95.620 .7 .7 96.292 3.0 3.0 99.2

3 .1 .1 99.312 .4 .4 99.7

6 .2 .2 99.92 .1 .1 100.0

3038 100.0 100.0

AccountingBISBISEBusinessBusiness AdministrationBusiness EducationEconomicsEducationFinanceHuman Resource MgtInformation TechnologyManagementMarketingMarketing EducaitonOffice Systems SupportProduction ManagementSocial SciencesTotal


CumulativePercent

Table 4. Education

2502 82.4 82.4 82.430 1.0 1.0 83.319 .6 .6 84.0

7 .2 .2 84.2171 5.6 5.6 89.8

18 .6 .6 90.4

39 1.3 1.3 91.724 .8 .8 92.558 1.9 1.9 94.4

102 3.4 3.4 97.829 1.0 1.0 98.739 1.3 1.3 100.0

3038 100.0 100.0

Communicative DisordersEarly Childhood EducationEducationElementary EducationHealth EducationSpecialistHealth, Physical Ed & RecParks and RecreationPhysical EducationPsychologySecondary EducationSpecial EducationTotal


CumulativePercent

C - 2

Table 5. Engineering

2725 89.7 89.7 89.75 .2 .2 89.9

2 .1 .1 89.9

7 .2 .2 90.2

22 .7 .7 90.9

85 2.8 2.8 93.724 .8 .8 94.5

9 .3 .3 94.852 1.7 1.7 96.5

8 .3 .3 96.7

3 .1 .1 96.8

5 .2 .2 97.03 .1 .1 97.1

9 .3 .3 97.4

32 1.1 1.1 98.51 .0 .0 98.5

12 .4 .4 98.9

2 .1 .1 98.9

32 1.1 1.1 100.03038 100.0 100.0

AerospaceBiological & AgriculturalEngineeringBiological EngineeringCivil & EnvironmentalEngineeringCivil ENgineeringComputer EngineeringDraftingElectrical EngineeringEnvironmentalEngineeringIndustrial TeacherEducaitonIndustrial TechnologyIT (Aero Technology)IT (Electronics/ComputerTech)IT (Flight Tech)IT (Industrial Technology)IT (Welding EngineeringTech)ManufacturingEngineeringMechanical EngineeringTotal


CumulativePercent

Table 6. Family Life

2815 92.7 92.7 92.714 .5 .5 93.1

42 1.4 1.4 94.5

19 .6 .6 95.1

118 3.9 3.9 99.0

1 .0 .0 99.0

1 .0 .0 99.1

25 .8 .8 99.9

3 .1 .1 100.0

3038 100.0 100.0

Apparel and TextilesFamily & ConsumerSciencesFamily & ConsumerSciences EducationFamily & HumanDevelopmentFamily LifeFood Microbiology &SafetyInterior DesignNutrition and FoodSciencesTotal


CumulativePercent

C - 3

Table 7. Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences

2335 76.9 76.9 76.93 .1 .1 77.0

18 .6 .6 77.691 3.0 3.0 80.5

4 .1 .1 80.719 .6 .6 81.382 2.7 2.7 84.0

2 .1 .1 84.14 .1 .1 84.2

54 1.8 1.8 86.09 .3 .3 86.3

71 2.3 2.3 88.629 1.0 1.0 89.678 2.6 2.6 92.128 .9 .9 93.1

8 .3 .3 93.36 .2 .2 93.5

52 1.7 1.7 95.29 .3 .3 95.51 .0 .0 95.6

34 1.1 1.1 96.765 2.1 2.1 98.827 .9 .9 99.7

9 .3 .3 100.03038 100.0 100.0

American StudiesAnthropologyArtAsian StudiesCommunicationEnglishFrenchGermanHistoryInternational RelationsJournalismLandscape ArchitectureLiberal Arts and SciencesMusicMusic TherapyPhilosophyPolitical SciencePre-lawSocial ScienceSocial WorkSociologySpanishTheatre ArtsTotal


CumulativePercent

Table 8. Natural Resources

2969 97.7 97.7 97.714 .5 .5 98.219 .6 .6 98.8

4 .1 .1 98.99 .3 .3 99.21 .0 .0 99.32 .1 .1 99.37 .2 .2 99.66 .2 .2 99.87 .2 .2 100.0

3038 100.0 100.0

Environmental StudiesFisheries and WildlifeForestryGeographyNatural ResourcesRangeRangeland ResourcesRec Resources MgtWaters ScienceTotal


CumulativePercent

C - 4

Table 9. Science

2862 94.2 94.2 94.21 .0 .0 94.2

57 1.9 1.9 96.111 .4 .4 96.5

1 .0 .0 96.57 .2 .2 96.7

2 .1 .1 96.8

1 .0 .0 96.8

4 .1 .1 97.0

40 1.3 1.3 98.33 .1 .1 98.41 .0 .0 98.47 .2 .2 98.7

17 .6 .6 99.27 .2 .2 99.41 .0 .0 99.5

11 .4 .4 99.85 .2 .2 100.0

3038 100.0 100.0

BiochemistryBiologyChemistryChemistry TeachingCompositeComposite TeachingMath/CS/StatCompostie TeachingPhysical Science (Chem)Compostie TeachingPhysical Science(Physics)Computer ScienceGeologyMathematical SciencesMathematicsMathematics EducationPhysicsPhysics TeachingPublic HealthStatisticsTotal


CumulativePercent

Table 10. College, Other

2955 97.3 97.3 97.344 1.4 1.4 98.7

9 .3 .3 99.030 1.0 1.0 100.0

3038 100.0 100.0

Interdisciplinary StudiesInternational StudiesOtherTotal


CumulativePercent

Table 11. Cumulative GPA

867 28.5 31.0 31.01160 38.2 41.4 72.4

670 22.1 23.9 96.4102 3.4 3.6 100.0

2799 92.1 100.0239 7.9

3038 100.0

4.0 - 3.63.5 - 3.13.0 - 2.62.5 - 2.0Total

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 5

Table 12. Degree Student is Receiving

6 .2 .2 .2149 4.9 5.2 5.4

2702 88.9 94.1 99.513 .4 .5 100.0

2870 94.5 100.0168 5.5

3038 100.0

CertificateAssociateBachelorsMastersTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 13. Gender

1503 49.5 52.2 52.21374 45.2 47.8 100.02877 94.7 100.0

161 5.33038 100.0

FemaleMaleTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 14. Citizenship

2744 90.3 96.0 96.0113 3.7 4.0 100.0

2857 94.0 100.0181 6.0

3038 100.0

USOtherTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 15. Ethnicity

14 .5 .5 .5

64 2.1 2.3 2.858 1.9 2.1 4.9

2615 86.1 93.4 98.29 .3 .3 98.5

41 1.3 1.5 100.02801 92.2 100.0

237 7.83038 100.0

American Indian orAlaskan NativeHispanicAsian or Pacific IslanderWhite, Non-hispanicBlack, Non-hispanicOther, unspecifiedTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 6

Table 16. Marital Status

1447 47.6 50.4 50.41355 44.6 47.2 97.6

58 1.9 2.0 99.73 .1 .1 99.87 .2 .2 100.0

2870 94.5 100.0168 5.5

3038 100.0

SingleMarriedDivorcedWidowedSeparatedTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Tabel 17. Number of Dependents

1961 64.5 69.1 69.1440 14.5 15.5 84.7238 7.8 8.4 93.1102 3.4 3.6 96.7

50 1.6 1.8 98.445 1.5 1.6 100.0

2836 93.4 100.0202 6.6

3038 100.0

Zero12345 +Total

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 18. Age

170 5.6 5.9 5.91912 62.9 66.6 72.5

561 18.5 19.5 92.1148 4.9 5.2 97.2

64 2.1 2.2 99.413 .4 .5 99.9

3 .1 .1 100.02871 94.5 100.0

167 5.53038 100.0

18 - 2021 - 2526 - 3031 - 4041 - 5051 - 6060 +Total

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 19. Residence When not attending USU

1213 39.9 42.5 42.5

1178 38.8 41.2 83.7

383 12.6 13.4 97.182 2.7 2.9 100.0

2856 94.0 100.0182 6.0

3038 100.0

Cache ValleyUtah, outsideCache ValleyOutside Utah in USOutside the USATotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 7

Tabel 20. Length of Attendance

11 .4 .4 .460 2.0 2.1 2.5

507 16.7 17.7 20.2645 21.2 22.6 42.8855 28.1 29.9 72.7547 18.0 19.1 91.8233 7.7 8.2 100.0

2858 94.1 100.0180 5.9

3038 100.0

<1123456 +Total

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 21. Where student took majority of thier classes

253 8.3 8.9 8.92325 76.5 81.8 90.7

264 8.7 9.3 100.0

2842 93.5 100.0196 6.5

3038 100.0

Another college/universityLogan CampusOther USU locations (e.g.Moab, Roosevelt)Total

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Tabel 22. Do you plan to continue your education

1572 51.7 54.8 54.8347 11.4 12.1 66.9951 31.3 33.1 100.0

2870 94.5 100.0168 5.5

3038 100.0

YesNoUndecidedTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 23. Employment Status

566 18.6 19.9 19.91566 51.5 54.9 74.8

719 23.7 25.2 100.02851 93.8 100.0

187 6.23038 100.0

Employed full-timeEmployed part-timeUnemployedTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 8

Tabel 24. Amount of time worked while attending USU

376 12.4 13.2 13.2574 18.9 20.1 33.3948 31.2 33.2 66.5479 15.8 16.8 83.3478 15.7 16.7 100.0

2855 94.0 100.0183 6.0

3038 100.0

None1/4 time1/2 time3/4 timeFull-timeTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Tabel 25. Is employment:

1003 33.0 43.9 43.91280 42.1 56.1 100.02283 75.1 100.0

755 24.93038 100.0

related to your degree?unrelated to your degree?Total

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 26. Career related practical experience

947 31.2 33.4 33.4458 15.1 16.1 49.5693 22.8 24.4 74.0182 6.0 6.4 80.4557 18.3 19.6 100.0

2837 93.4 100.0201 6.6

3038 100.0

Practicum/internshipVolunteer experiencesEmploymentWork-studyNoneTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Tabel 27. What students tell friends about USU

1128 37.1 39.6 39.6

1236 40.7 43.4 82.9

395 13.0 13.9 96.8

63 2.1 2.2 99.0

28 .9 1.0 100.0

2850 93.8 100.0188 6.2

3038 100.0

It's great; come hereto schoolMostly positive thingsNothing much,positive or negativeMostly negative thingsIt's not great; don'tcome here to schoolTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 9

Tabel 28. Number of semesters you have been assigned this advisor

308 10.1 11.1 11.1472 15.5 17.0 28.1437 14.4 15.8 43.9706 23.2 25.5 69.4849 27.9 30.6 100.0

2772 91.2 100.0266 8.8

3038 100.0

1 semester2 semesters3 semesters4 semesters5+ semestersTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Tabel 29. Reasons for not meeting with advisor

125 4.1 16.0 16.0

226 7.4 28.9 44.9

195 6.4 24.9 69.8

55 1.8 7.0 76.9

115 3.8 14.7 91.6

66 2.2 8.4 100.0

782 25.7 100.02256 74.33038 100.0

Did not think it wasnecessaryGot the information Iwanted/Got the information Iwanted /Did not know who myadvisor wasMy advisor kept meinformedDid not getinformation I wanted/Total

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Tabel 30. If there were no obstacles would you visit your advisor more

1229 40.5 47.2 47.21376 45.3 52.8 100.02605 85.7 100.0

433 14.33038 100.0

YesNoTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 31. How many times have you changed your major

1250 41.1 44.5 44.51080 35.5 38.5 83.0

316 10.4 11.3 94.3128 4.2 4.6 98.8

33 1.1 1.2 100.02807 92.4 100.0

231 7.63038 100.0

Never1 time2 times3 times4+ timesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 10

Table 32. In an ideal system I could make an appointment to meet my advisor

821 27.0 29.5 29.51547 50.9 55.5 85.0

419 13.8 15.0 100.02787 91.7 100.0

251 8.33038 100.0

1 hour in advance1 day in advance1 week in advanceTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Tabel 33. If there were no obstacles I would visit with my advisor

69 2.3 2.5 2.577 2.5 2.7 5.2

522 17.2 18.5 23.7514 16.9 18.3 42.0

1277 42.0 45.4 87.4265 8.7 9.4 96.8

91 3.0 3.2 100.02815 92.7 100.0

223 7.33038 100.0

WeeklyEvery other weekMonthlyEvery couple monthsEach semesterOnce a yearNeverTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Tabel 34. Average length of advising appointments

1059 34.9 37.8 37.81324 43.6 47.3 85.0

341 11.2 12.2 97.278 2.6 2.8 100.0

2802 92.2 100.0236 7.8

3038 100.0

1-10 minutes11-20 minutes21-30 minutes30 or more minutesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 11

Tabel 35. Number of times student met with advisor

249 8.2 8.8 8.8463 15.2 16.4 25.2653 21.5 23.1 48.3576 19.0 20.4 68.7397 13.1 14.0 82.7208 6.8 7.4 90.1114 3.8 4.0 94.1

32 1.1 1.1 95.344 1.4 1.6 96.810 .3 .4 97.280 2.6 2.8 100.0

2826 93.0 100.0212 7.0

3038 100.0

Never1 time2 times3 times4 times5 times6 times7 times8 times9 times10 + timesTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 36. Major source of information for academic planning

1092 35.9 38.6 38.6177 5.8 6.3 44.9126 4.1 4.5 49.3

1213 39.9 42.9 92.2139 4.6 4.9 97.1

82 2.7 2.9 100.02829 93.1 100.0

209 6.93038 100.0

AdvisorOther faculty/staffUSU General CatalogMajor requirement sheetsOther studentsOtherTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Tabel 37. Other sources of information for academic planning

2954 97.2 97.2 97.2

1 .0 .0 97.3

1 .0 .0 97.31 .0 .0 97.31 .0 .0 97.4

1 .0 .0 97.4

1 .0 .0 97.4

1 .0 .0 97.51 .0 .0 97.51 .0 .0 97.51 .0 .0 97.61 .0 .0 97.6

1 .0 .0 97.6

1 .0 .0 97.7

Advisor at USU in BrighanCityArt DeptBrian Evans and advisorcatalogCNR Academics ServiceCentercombo faculty andrequirementdifferent collegeDr Evans AthleticsEdnet facilitatorEdnet FacilitatorFacilitatorfacilitator at concurrentenroFather


CumulativePercent

C - 12


1 .0 .0 97.7

1 .0 .0 97.71 .0 .0 97.8

1 .0 .0 97.8

1 .0 .0 97.81 .0 .0 97.91 .0 .0 97.91 .0 .0 97.91 .0 .0 98.01 .0 .0 98.01 .0 .0 98.01 .0 .0 98.16 .2 .2 98.31 .0 .0 98.31 .0 .0 98.31 .0 .0 98.42 .1 .1 98.41 .0 .0 98.51 .0 .0 98.51 .0 .0 98.51 .0 .0 98.6

1 .0 .0 98.6

1 .0 .0 98.61 .0 .0 98.71 .0 .0 98.7

1 .0 .0 98.7

7 .2 .2 98.91 .0 .0 99.01 .0 .0 99.01 .0 .0 99.01 .0 .0 99.14 .1 .1 99.22 .1 .1 99.31 .0 .0 99.31 .0 .0 99.31 .0 .0 99.42 .1 .1 99.42 .1 .1 99.51 .0 .0 99.51 .0 .0 99.61 .0 .0 99.61 .0 .0 99.61 .0 .0 99.71 .0 .0 99.71 .0 .0 99.73 .1 .1 99.81 .0 .0 99.92 .1 .1 99.9

five five five nine zero twotFlyersFriendsHad to figure it out on myownHASS advisingHASS AdvisingHASS Advising officeHASS advisorHASS advisorsHyrum Hall logan advisorIn classinternetInternetInternet USU QuadJoan smithJohn JaussiKathy BaynKoichi othMadeline ThimmesMinor AdvisorMoneyMulticultural StudentServicesMy familyMy interestMy own researchMy wife and I wouldresearch oMyselfMyself look at grad sheeton my ownOnline AdvisingOnline USUPeer advisorPeer Advisorpeer advisorsPotential employersRelativesSelfSisterSOARSSS ServicesStudent AdvisorsUSU web pageusu websiteUSU websitewebWebWeb siteWebsite


CumulativePercent

C - 13


1 .0 .0 100.01 .0 .0 100.0

3038 100.0 100.0

WifeWorkTotal


CumulativePercent

Table 38. My advisor is friendly

1490 49.0 53.2 53.2919 30.3 32.8 86.0254 8.4 9.1 95.1

70 2.3 2.5 97.642 1.4 1.5 99.125 .8 .9 100.0

2800 92.2 100.0238 7.8

3038 100.0

Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly DisagreeNot ApplicableTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 39. Advisor is interested in my welfare

1198 39.4 42.8 42.8947 31.2 33.8 76.7450 14.8 16.1 92.7112 3.7 4.0 96.7

57 1.9 2.0 98.834 1.1 1.2 100.0

2798 92.1 100.0240 7.9

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 40. Advisor is readily available for consultation

821 27.0 29.4 29.41061 34.9 38.1 67.5

544 17.9 19.5 87.0234 7.7 8.4 95.4

96 3.2 3.4 98.932 1.1 1.1 100.0

2788 91.8 100.0250 8.2

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 14

Table 41. Advisor is easy to make an appointment with

770 25.3 27.7 27.71078 35.5 38.7 66.4

545 17.9 19.6 86.0227 7.5 8.2 94.1100 3.3 3.6 97.7

64 2.1 2.3 100.02784 91.6 100.0

254 8.43038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 42. Advisor does not make me feel rushed during appointments

997 32.8 35.7 35.71049 34.5 37.6 73.3

429 14.1 15.4 88.7177 5.8 6.3 95.0

76 2.5 2.7 97.763 2.1 2.3 100.0

2791 91.9 100.0247 8.1

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 43. Advisor is prepared for appointments

1031 33.9 37.0 37.01015 33.4 36.5 73.5

455 15.0 16.3 89.9124 4.1 4.5 94.3

59 1.9 2.1 96.499 3.3 3.6 100.0

2783 91.6 100.0255 8.4

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 15

Table 44. Advisor communicated effectively

1095 36.0 39.3 39.31120 36.9 40.2 79.5

367 12.1 13.2 92.6121 4.0 4.3 97.0

42 1.4 1.5 98.542 1.4 1.5 100.0

2787 91.7 100.0251 8.3

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Tabel 45. Advisor listends to my concerns

1065 35.1 38.3 38.31081 35.6 38.8 77.1

419 13.8 15.1 92.1110 3.6 4.0 96.1

61 2.0 2.2 98.348 1.6 1.7 100.0

2784 91.6 100.0254 8.4

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 46. Advisor understands my need for advice

974 32.1 35.1 35.11058 34.8 38.1 73.2

499 16.4 18.0 91.1121 4.0 4.4 95.5

62 2.0 2.2 97.763 2.1 2.3 100.0

2777 91.4 100.0261 8.6

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 16

Table 47. Advisor helps me clarify career and life goals

768 25.3 27.8 27.8761 25.0 27.5 55.3731 24.1 26.5 81.8222 7.3 8.0 89.8106 3.5 3.8 93.7175 5.8 6.3 100.0

2763 90.9 100.0275 9.1

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Tabel 48. Advisor refers me to resources that help clarify career/life goals

706 23.2 25.6 25.6781 25.7 28.3 53.9735 24.2 26.6 80.5205 6.7 7.4 87.9116 3.8 4.2 92.1218 7.2 7.9 100.0

2761 90.9 100.0277 9.1

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 49. Advisor helps me understand my interest and abilities

593 19.5 21.3 21.3660 21.7 23.7 45.1894 29.4 32.2 77.3251 8.3 9.0 86.3113 3.7 4.1 90.4268 8.8 9.6 100.0

2779 91.5 100.0259 8.5

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 17

Table 50. Advisor helps me evaluate my interests and abilities

573 18.9 20.7 20.7657 21.6 23.7 44.4876 28.8 31.6 76.0275 9.1 9.9 85.9109 3.6 3.9 89.8282 9.3 10.2 100.0

2772 91.2 100.0266 8.8

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 51. Advisor keeps my intersts and abilities in mind when helping me choose courses/programs

696 22.9 25.2 25.2754 24.8 27.3 52.5757 24.9 27.4 79.9207 6.8 7.5 87.4110 3.6 4.0 91.4237 7.8 8.6 100.0

2761 90.9 100.0277 9.1

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 52. Advisor helps me develop decision making skills

558 18.4 20.1 20.1687 22.6 24.8 44.9892 29.4 32.2 77.0235 7.7 8.5 85.5

85 2.8 3.1 88.6317 10.4 11.4 100.0

2774 91.3 100.0264 8.7

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 18

Table 53. Advisor helps me with realistic self-appraisal

565 18.6 20.4 20.4701 23.1 25.3 45.7883 29.1 31.8 77.5207 6.8 7.5 85.0

80 2.6 2.9 87.8337 11.1 12.2 100.0

2773 91.3 100.0265 8.7

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 54. Advisor helps me develop suitable educational goals/plans

769 25.3 27.8 27.8991 32.6 35.9 63.7611 20.1 22.1 85.8153 5.0 5.5 91.3

72 2.4 2.6 94.0167 5.5 6.0 100.0

2763 90.9 100.0275 9.1

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 55. Advisor help me evaluate my progress toward my educational goals

847 27.9 30.6 30.61028 33.8 37.1 67.7

566 18.6 20.4 88.2131 4.3 4.7 92.9

58 1.9 2.1 95.0139 4.6 5.0 100.0

2769 91.1 100.0269 8.9

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 19

Table 56. Advisor helps me make academic/career decisions

765 25.2 27.6 27.6973 32.0 35.1 62.7635 20.9 22.9 85.6158 5.2 5.7 91.3

61 2.0 2.2 93.5180 5.9 6.5 100.0

2772 91.2 100.0266 8.8

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 57. Advisor helps me successfully manage my time

518 17.1 18.8 18.8568 18.7 20.6 39.4898 29.6 32.6 72.0256 8.4 9.3 81.2

76 2.5 2.8 84.0441 14.5 16.0 100.0

2757 90.8 100.0281 9.2

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 58. Advisor helps me overcome educational problems

553 18.2 20.0 20.0584 19.2 21.2 41.2822 27.1 29.8 71.0224 7.4 8.1 79.1

86 2.8 3.1 82.2490 16.1 17.8 100.0

2759 90.8 100.0279 9.2

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 20

Table 59. Advisor refers me to resources that can help me overcome educational problems

537 17.7 19.4 19.4585 19.3 21.2 40.6812 26.7 29.4 69.9196 6.5 7.1 77.0

79 2.6 2.9 79.9556 18.3 20.1 100.0

2765 91.0 100.0273 9.0

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 60. Advisor refers me to resources pertinent to my educational goals

286 9.4 10.3 10.3117 3.9 4.2 14.6273 9.0 9.9 24.4669 22.0 24.2 48.6709 23.3 25.6 74.3712 23.4 25.7 100.0

2766 91.0 100.0272 9.0

3038 100.0

Not ApplicableStrongly DisagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly AgreeTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Tabel 61. Advisor encourages me to participate in experiences which lead to my intellectural growth

274 9.0 9.9 9.995 3.1 3.4 13.3

248 8.2 9.0 22.3733 24.1 26.5 48.8719 23.7 26.0 74.8698 23.0 25.2 100.0

2767 91.1 100.0271 8.9

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 21

Tabel 62. Advisor helps me select appropriate courses

151 5.0 5.5 5.570 2.3 2.5 8.0

126 4.1 4.6 12.6462 15.2 16.7 29.3

1009 33.2 36.5 65.8944 31.1 34.2 100.0

2762 90.9 100.0276 9.1

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 63. Advisor interprets institutional requirements so they are understandable to me

151 5.0 5.5 5.593 3.1 3.4 8.8

131 4.3 4.7 13.6453 14.9 16.4 29.9995 32.8 36.0 65.9944 31.1 34.1 100.0

2767 91.1 100.0271 8.9

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 64. Advisor gives me correct information on services/programs

167 5.5 6.0 6.095 3.1 3.4 9.5

116 3.8 4.2 13.7512 16.9 18.5 32.2963 31.7 34.8 67.0913 30.1 33.0 100.0

2766 91.0 100.0272 9.0

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 22

Table 65. Advisor is well informed about changes in academic requirements

122 4.0 4.4 4.4130 4.3 4.7 9.1147 4.8 5.3 14.4487 16.0 17.6 32.0905 29.8 32.7 64.7976 32.1 35.3 100.0

2767 91.1 100.0271 8.9

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 66. Advisor gives me advise in a straight forward understandable manner

95 3.1 3.4 3.469 2.3 2.5 5.991 3.0 3.3 9.2

412 13.6 14.9 24.11028 33.8 37.1 61.21075 35.4 38.8 100.02770 91.2 100.0

268 8.83038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 67. Advisor tells me why she/he offers particular advice

203 6.7 7.3 7.383 2.7 3.0 10.3

164 5.4 5.9 16.3665 21.9 24.0 40.3849 27.9 30.7 71.0804 26.5 29.0 100.0

2768 91.1 100.0270 8.9

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 23

Table 68. Advisor encourages me to participate in extracurricular activities

390 12.8 14.1 14.1133 4.4 4.8 19.0312 10.3 11.3 30.3839 27.6 30.4 60.7504 16.6 18.3 78.9581 19.1 21.1 100.0

2759 90.8 100.0279 9.2

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 69. Advisor appears to be well trained

74 2.4 2.7 2.799 3.3 3.6 6.3

102 3.4 3.7 9.9387 12.7 14.0 23.9923 30.4 33.4 57.3

1182 38.9 42.7 100.02767 91.1 100.0

271 8.93038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 70. Interactions with my advisor are positive

70 2.3 2.5 2.587 2.9 3.2 5.7

115 3.8 4.2 9.9354 11.7 12.8 22.7912 30.0 33.1 55.8

1219 40.1 44.2 100.02757 90.8 100.0

281 9.23038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 24

Table 71. I don't have to wait long between scheduling and seeing my advisor

123 4.0 4.5 4.5144 4.7 5.2 9.7207 6.8 7.5 17.1447 14.7 16.2 33.3926 30.5 33.5 66.8917 30.2 33.2 100.0

2764 91.0 100.0274 9.0

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 72. Overall I am satisfied with the advising system at USU

56 1.8 2.0 2.0202 6.6 7.3 9.3270 8.9 9.8 19.1548 18.0 19.8 38.9904 29.8 32.7 71.6787 25.9 28.4 100.0

2767 91.1 100.0271 8.9

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 73. Overall I am satisfied with the advising system in my college/department

52 1.7 1.9 1.9185 6.1 6.7 8.6231 7.6 8.3 16.9433 14.3 15.6 32.5908 29.9 32.8 65.3962 31.7 34.7 100.0

2771 91.2 100.0267 8.8

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 25

Table 74. Overall I am satisfied with my advisor

57 1.9 2.1 2.1136 4.5 4.9 7.0148 4.9 5.3 12.3361 11.9 13.0 25.4878 28.9 31.7 57.1

1187 39.1 42.9 100.02767 91.1 100.0

271 8.93038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 75. Topics: Courses for the semester

1208 39.8 46.7 46.7974 32.1 37.6 84.3330 10.9 12.7 97.0

58 1.9 2.2 99.319 .6 .7 100.0

2589 85.2 100.0449 14.8

3038 100.0

Very SatisfiedSatisfiedNeutralDissatisfiedVery DissatisfiedTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 76. Topics: Degree requirements

1256 41.3 47.8 47.81017 33.5 38.7 86.5

260 8.6 9.9 96.472 2.4 2.7 99.222 .7 .8 100.0

2627 86.5 100.0411 13.5

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 77. Topics: Major requirements

1252 41.2 47.7 47.71034 34.0 39.4 87.2

256 8.4 9.8 96.959 1.9 2.2 99.222 .7 .8 100.0

2623 86.3 100.0415 13.7

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 26

Table 78. Topics: Minor requirements

668 22.0 31.9 31.9590 19.4 28.2 60.1672 22.1 32.1 92.3

93 3.1 4.4 96.769 2.3 3.3 100.0

2092 68.9 100.0946 31.1

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 79. Topics: General Education requirements

880 29.0 37.8 37.8794 26.1 34.1 71.9497 16.4 21.3 93.3101 3.3 4.3 97.6

56 1.8 2.4 100.02328 76.6 100.0

710 23.43038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 80. Topics: Selecting or changing your major

620 20.4 31.6 31.6539 17.7 27.4 59.0701 23.1 35.7 94.7

54 1.8 2.7 97.550 1.6 2.5 100.0

1964 64.6 100.01074 35.43038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 81. Topics: Transfer credits

639 21.0 31.8 31.8577 19.0 28.7 60.6643 21.2 32.0 92.6

82 2.7 4.1 96.767 2.2 3.3 100.0

2008 66.1 100.01030 33.93038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 27

Table 82. Topics: Registration procedures

706 23.2 34.6 34.6663 21.8 32.5 67.0570 18.8 27.9 94.9

60 2.0 2.9 97.844 1.4 2.2 100.0

2043 67.2 100.0995 32.8

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 83. Topics: Academic probation

252 8.3 17.2 17.2230 7.6 15.7 32.9877 28.9 59.8 92.7

28 .9 1.9 94.679 2.6 5.4 100.0

1466 48.3 100.01572 51.73038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 84. Topics: Career choice

495 16.3 27.5 27.5493 16.2 27.4 54.9637 21.0 35.4 90.3104 3.4 5.8 96.1

70 2.3 3.9 100.01799 59.2 100.01239 40.83038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 85. Topics: Internships

491 16.2 26.4 26.4475 15.6 25.6 52.0680 22.4 36.6 88.6121 4.0 6.5 95.2

90 3.0 4.8 100.01857 61.1 100.01181 38.93038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 28

Table 86. Topics: Research with faculty

287 9.4 18.8 18.8278 9.2 18.2 37.0762 25.1 50.0 87.0106 3.5 7.0 94.0

92 3.0 6.0 100.01525 50.2 100.01513 49.83038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Tabel 87. Topics: How to get the most out of your educational experience at USU

410 13.5 24.8 24.8393 12.9 23.8 48.6661 21.8 40.0 88.7118 3.9 7.1 95.8

69 2.3 4.2 100.01651 54.3 100.01387 45.73038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 88. Topics: Study skills

266 8.8 17.7 17.7278 9.2 18.5 36.2783 25.8 52.1 88.3102 3.4 6.8 95.1

73 2.4 4.9 100.01502 49.4 100.01536 50.63038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 89. Topics: Concerns about specific courses

633 20.8 32.0 32.0651 21.4 32.9 64.8546 18.0 27.6 92.4

97 3.2 4.9 97.353 1.7 2.7 100.0

1980 65.2 100.01058 34.83038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 29

Table 90. Topics: Concerns about specific faculty

315 10.4 20.8 20.8282 9.3 18.6 39.4769 25.3 50.8 90.2

74 2.4 4.9 95.075 2.5 5.0 100.0

1515 49.9 100.01523 50.13038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 91. Topics: Application to graduate/professional schools

492 16.2 27.6 27.6440 14.5 24.7 52.4662 21.8 37.2 89.6112 3.7 6.3 95.8

74 2.4 4.2 100.01780 58.6 100.01258 41.43038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 92. Topics: Personal problems

290 9.5 19.6 19.6218 7.2 14.7 34.4825 27.2 55.8 90.2

64 2.1 4.3 94.581 2.7 5.5 100.0

1478 48.7 100.01560 51.33038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 93. Topics: Credit by examination (CLEP)

236 7.8 16.6 16.6227 7.5 15.9 32.5814 26.8 57.2 89.7

77 2.5 5.4 95.170 2.3 4.9 100.0

1424 46.9 100.01614 53.13038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 30

Table 94. Topics: Advanced placement (AP) courses

263 8.7 17.7 17.7271 8.9 18.2 36.0829 27.3 55.8 91.8

61 2.0 4.1 95.961 2.0 4.1 100.0

1485 48.9 100.01553 51.13038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 95. Topics: Work study/on-campus employment

230 7.6 16.4 16.4204 6.7 14.6 31.0820 27.0 58.5 89.4

73 2.4 5.2 94.775 2.5 5.3 100.0

1402 46.1 100.01636 53.93038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 96. Topics: Job placement after graduation

284 9.3 18.7 18.7263 8.7 17.4 36.1739 24.3 48.8 84.9133 4.4 8.8 93.7

96 3.2 6.3 100.01515 49.9 100.01523 50.13038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 97. Topics: Withdrawing from USU

166 5.5 12.8 12.8134 4.4 10.3 23.1892 29.4 68.6 91.7

34 1.1 2.6 94.374 2.4 5.7 100.0

1300 42.8 100.01738 57.23038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 31

Table 98. Overall quality of education

769 25.3 28.4 28.41537 50.6 56.7 85.1

311 10.2 11.5 96.685 2.8 3.1 99.7

8 .3 .3 100.02710 89.2 100.0

328 10.83038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 99. Overall quality of the program in your major

967 31.8 35.7 35.71270 41.8 46.9 82.6

339 11.2 12.5 95.2110 3.6 4.1 99.2

21 .7 .8 100.02707 89.1 100.0

331 10.93038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 100. Variety of courses in your major

765 25.2 28.3 28.31195 39.3 44.2 72.5

474 15.6 17.5 90.0237 7.8 8.8 98.7

34 1.1 1.3 100.02705 89.0 100.0

333 11.03038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

101. Challenge of courses in your major

884 29.1 32.7 32.71326 43.6 49.1 81.8

379 12.5 14.0 95.8101 3.3 3.7 99.5

13 .4 .5 100.02703 89.0 100.0

335 11.03038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 32

Table 102. Accessiblity of faculty

801 26.4 29.7 29.71221 40.2 45.2 74.9

532 17.5 19.7 94.6128 4.2 4.7 99.3

19 .6 .7 100.02701 88.9 100.0

337 11.13038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 103. Helpfulness of faculty

886 29.2 32.9 32.91207 39.7 44.8 77.7

460 15.1 17.1 94.7119 3.9 4.4 99.1

23 .8 .9 100.02695 88.7 100.0

343 11.33038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 104. Degree to which you were treated fairly

939 30.9 34.7 34.71266 41.7 46.8 81.5

387 12.7 14.3 95.891 3.0 3.4 99.222 .7 .8 100.0

2705 89.0 100.0333 11.0

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

105. Overall quality of University Studies/General Education

296 9.7 14.1 14.1929 30.6 44.4 58.6593 19.5 28.3 86.9203 6.7 9.7 96.6

71 2.3 3.4 100.02092 68.9 100.0

946 31.13038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 33

Tabel 106. Variety of courses in University Studies/General Education

367 12.1 17.6 17.6902 29.7 43.2 60.7552 18.2 26.4 87.2198 6.5 9.5 96.6

70 2.3 3.4 100.02089 68.8 100.0

949 31.23038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 107. Challenge of courses in Universtiy Studies/General Education

321 10.6 15.4 15.4940 30.9 45.0 60.3611 20.1 29.2 89.6158 5.2 7.6 97.1

60 2.0 2.9 100.02090 68.8 100.0

948 31.23038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

108. Preparation: Communication

632 20.8 23.4 23.4663 21.8 24.5 47.9

1072 35.3 39.6 87.5106 3.5 3.9 91.4

23 .8 .9 92.3209 6.9 7.7 100.0

2705 89.0 100.0333 11.0

3038 100.0

Not at USUVery WellWellPoorlyVery PoorlyNot ApplicableTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

109. Preparation: Numeracy

612 20.1 22.8 22.8580 19.1 21.6 44.4

1033 34.0 38.5 82.9139 4.6 5.2 88.0

46 1.5 1.7 89.8275 9.1 10.2 100.0

2685 88.4 100.0353 11.6

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 34

Table 110. Preparation: Computer Literacy

585 19.3 21.7 21.7720 23.7 26.7 48.4

1010 33.2 37.4 85.8160 5.3 5.9 91.7

42 1.4 1.6 93.3182 6.0 6.7 100.0

2699 88.8 100.0339 11.2

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 111. Preparation: Humanities and Art

601 19.8 22.3 22.3737 24.3 27.4 49.7989 32.6 36.8 86.5172 5.7 6.4 92.9

42 1.4 1.6 94.4150 4.9 5.6 100.0

2691 88.6 100.0347 11.4

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 112. Preparation: Social Science

600 19.7 22.3 22.3697 22.9 25.9 48.2

1068 35.2 39.7 87.9141 4.6 5.2 93.1

27 .9 1.0 94.1158 5.2 5.9 100.0

2691 88.6 100.0347 11.4

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 35

Table 113. Preparation: Life Science

635 20.9 23.5 23.5551 18.1 20.4 44.0

1112 36.6 41.2 85.2173 5.7 6.4 91.6

37 1.2 1.4 93.0190 6.3 7.0 100.0

2698 88.8 100.0340 11.2

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 114. Preparation: Physical Science

639 21.0 23.7 23.7582 19.2 21.6 45.3

1062 35.0 39.4 84.7162 5.3 6.0 90.7

32 1.1 1.2 91.9219 7.2 8.1 100.0

2696 88.7 100.0342 11.3

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 115. Impression: Undergraduate programs

134 4.4 4.9 4.91199 39.5 44.0 48.91184 39.0 43.4 92.3

191 6.3 7.0 99.319 .6 .7 100.0

2727 89.8 100.0311 10.2

3038 100.0

No OpinionVery GoodGoodFairPoorTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 116. Impression: Your major department

114 3.8 4.2 4.21618 53.3 59.2 63.3

764 25.1 27.9 91.3186 6.1 6.8 98.1

53 1.7 1.9 100.02735 90.0 100.0

303 10.03038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 36

Tabel 117. Impression: Teaching ability of faculty

92 3.0 3.4 3.41223 40.3 44.6 48.01102 36.3 40.2 88.1

275 9.1 10.0 98.250 1.6 1.8 100.0

2742 90.3 100.0296 9.7

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 118. Impression: Personal interest of faculty in students

104 3.4 3.8 3.81045 34.4 38.3 42.11053 34.7 38.5 80.6

430 14.2 15.7 96.3100 3.3 3.7 100.0

2732 89.9 100.0306 10.1

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 119. Impression: Quality of students

133 4.4 4.9 4.91017 33.5 37.3 42.11245 41.0 45.6 87.7

304 10.0 11.1 98.931 1.0 1.1 100.0

2730 89.9 100.0308 10.1

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 120. Impression: Research activities

498 16.4 18.3 18.3716 23.6 26.3 44.6999 32.9 36.7 81.4405 13.3 14.9 96.3101 3.3 3.7 100.0

2719 89.5 100.0319 10.5

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 37

Table 121. Impression: Public relations

447 14.7 16.4 16.4634 20.9 23.3 39.7

1106 36.4 40.6 80.3418 13.8 15.3 95.6119 3.9 4.4 100.0

2724 89.7 100.0314 10.3

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 122. Open Access Labs had the software I needed

984 32.4 37.0 37.01128 37.1 42.5 79.5

271 8.9 10.2 89.7108 3.6 4.1 93.8

41 1.3 1.5 95.3124 4.1 4.7 100.0

2656 87.4 100.0382 12.6

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Tabel 123. Lab consultants provided the help needed

582 19.2 21.9 21.9962 31.7 36.2 58.1651 21.4 24.5 82.5191 6.3 7.2 89.7

84 2.8 3.2 92.9189 6.2 7.1 100.0

2659 87.5 100.0379 12.5

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Tabel 124. I didn't wait long for an available computer in the lab

548 18.0 20.6 20.61127 37.1 42.4 63.0

519 17.1 19.5 82.5263 8.7 9.9 92.4

87 2.9 3.3 95.7115 3.8 4.3 100.0

2659 87.5 100.0379 12.5

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 38

Tabel 125. Overall, I was satisfied with the open access labs

796 26.2 29.9 29.91295 42.6 48.7 78.6

345 11.4 13.0 91.685 2.8 3.2 94.834 1.1 1.3 96.1

104 3.4 3.9 100.02659 87.5 100.0

379 12.53038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 126. Overall, I was satisfied with my USU email account

859 28.3 32.3 32.31169 38.5 43.9 76.2

323 10.6 12.1 88.4125 4.1 4.7 93.1

75 2.5 2.8 95.9109 3.6 4.1 100.0

2660 87.6 100.0378 12.4

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Tabel 127. Overall, I was satisfied with the USU modem access

690 22.7 26.2 26.21011 33.3 38.4 64.6

430 14.2 16.3 80.9111 3.7 4.2 85.1

69 2.3 2.6 87.7323 10.6 12.3 100.0

2634 86.7 100.0404 13.3

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 39

Tabel 128. Overall, I was satisfied with the dorm internet access

417 13.7 16.7 16.7433 14.3 17.3 34.1396 13.0 15.9 49.9

40 1.3 1.6 51.525 .8 1.0 52.5

1185 39.0 47.5 100.02496 82.2 100.0

542 17.83038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Table 129. I received good value for my computer fee

580 19.1 21.8 21.81034 34.0 38.9 60.7

595 19.6 22.4 83.1237 7.8 8.9 92.1129 4.2 4.9 96.9

82 2.7 3.1 100.02657 87.5 100.0

381 12.53038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Tabel 130. I used the internet address webmail.usu.edu to read my USU mail

297 9.8 10.8 10.8474 15.6 17.2 28.0553 18.2 20.1 48.0

1433 47.2 52.0 100.02757 90.8 100.0

281 9.23038 100.0

NeverSometimesMost of the timeAll of the timeTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Tabel 131. Number of privately owned computer you had regular access to during the past year

209 6.9 7.6 7.61461 48.1 53.0 60.6

751 24.7 27.2 87.8336 11.1 12.2 100.0

2757 90.8 100.0281 9.2

3038 100.0

None1 computer2 computers3+ computersTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 40

Tabel 132. How often did you use these privately owned computers to do your school work

55 1.8 2.2 2.2808 26.6 32.7 34.9

1042 34.3 42.1 77.0568 18.7 23.0 100.0

2473 81.4 100.0565 18.6

3038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Tabel 133. I had regular access during the past year to a USU computer, not in an open access lab

1303 42.9 47.5 47.51441 47.4 52.5 100.02744 90.3 100.0

294 9.73038 100.0

YesNoTotal

Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

Tabel 134. How often did you use this computer to do your school work

166 5.5 12.0 12.0744 24.5 54.0 66.0350 11.5 25.4 91.4119 3.9 8.6 100.0

1379 45.4 100.01659 54.63038 100.0


Valid

SystemMissingTotal


Percent

C - 41

Appendix D

Cross-Tabulation Tables

Appendix D. Graduating Student Survey 2004 Crosstabulations by College

Table 1. Cumulative GPA -- Crosstabulation by College

51 58 46 14 16930.2% 34.3% 27.2% 8.3% 100.0%

1.9% 2.1% 1.7% .5% 6.3%-.3 -1.4 .9 3.3

146 249 179 11 58525.0% 42.6% 30.6% 1.9% 100.0%

5.4% 9.2% 6.6% .4% 21.7%-2.7 .4 3.4 -2.1228 212 66 6 512

44.5% 41.4% 12.9% 1.2% 100.0%8.4% 7.9% 2.4% .2% 19.0%

5.4 .0 -5.1 -2.993 136 70 6 305

30.5% 44.6% 23.0% 2.0% 100.0%3.4% 5.0% 2.6% .2% 11.3%

-.2 .9 -.3 -1.559 75 58 3 195

30.3% 38.5% 29.7% 1.5% 100.0%2.2% 2.8% 2.1% .1% 7.2%

-.3 -.6 1.7 -1.5174 267 158 31 630

27.6% 42.4% 25.1% 4.9% 100.0%6.4% 9.9% 5.9% 1.1% 23.3%

-1.6 .4 .7 1.811 30 15 10 66

16.7% 45.5% 22.7% 15.2% 100.0%.4% 1.1% .6% .4% 2.4%-2.1 .5 -.2 5.0

61 64 32 6 16337.4% 39.3% 19.6% 3.7% 100.0%

2.3% 2.4% 1.2% .2% 6.0%1.4 -.4 -1.1 .1

Count% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. Residual

Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

college4.0 - 3.6 3.5 - 3.1 3.0 - 2.6 2.5 - 2.0

cumgpaTotal

D 1

Table 1. Cumulative GPA -- Crosstabulation by College

21 26 19 9 7528.0% 34.7% 25.3% 12.0% 100.0%

.8% 1.0% .7% .3% 2.8%-.5 -.9 .3 3.9

844 1117 643 96 270031.3% 41.4% 23.8% 3.6% 100.0%31.3% 41.4% 23.8% 3.6% 100.0%

Count% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of Total

Othercollege

Total

4.0 - 3.6 3.5 - 3.1 3.0 - 2.6 2.5 - 2.0cumgpa

Total

Table 2. Degree Received -- Crosstabulation by College

5 15 155 0 1752.9% 8.6% 88.6% .0% 100.0%

.2% .5% 5.6% .0% 6.3%7.5 2.0 -.8 -.9

0 33 562 0 595.0% 5.5% 94.5% .0% 100.0%.0% 1.2% 20.3% .0% 21.5%-1.1 .4 .1 -1.7

1 16 507 0 524.2% 3.1% 96.8% .0% 100.0%.0% .6% 18.3% .0% 18.9%

-.1 -2.2 .6 -1.60 15 284 12 311

.0% 4.8% 91.3% 3.9% 100.0%

.0% .5% 10.3% .4% 11.2%-.8 -.3 -.5 8.7

0 7 191 0 198.0% 3.5% 96.5% .0% 100.0%.0% .3% 6.9% .0% 7.2%

-.7 -1.0 .3 -1.0

Count% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. Residual

Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

collegeCertificate Associate Bachelors Masters

worktowaTotal

D 2

Table 2. Degree Received -- Crosstabulation by College

0 10 639 0 649.0% 1.5% 98.5% .0% 100.0%.0% .4% 23.1% .0% 23.5%-1.2 -4.1 1.1 -1.7

0 0 65 1 66.0% .0% 98.5% 1.5% 100.0%.0% .0% 2.3% .0% 2.4%

-.4 -1.9 .4 1.20 12 157 0 169

.0% 7.1% 92.9% .0% 100.0%

.0% .4% 5.7% .0% 6.1%-.6 1.1 -.2 -.9

0 36 43 0 79.0% 45.6% 54.4% .0% 100.0%.0% 1.3% 1.6% .0% 2.9%

-.4 15.7 -3.6 -.66 144 2603 13 2766

.2% 5.2% 94.1% .5% 100.0%

.2% 5.2% 94.1% .5% 100.0%

Count% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of Total

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

Certificate Associate Bachelors Mastersworktowa

Total

Table 3. Gender -- Crosstabulation by College

88 88 17650.0% 50.0% 100.0%

3.2% 3.2% 6.3%-.4 .5

228 372 60038.0% 62.0% 100.0%

8.2% 13.4% 21.6%-4.9 5.1

Count% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. Residual

Agriculture

Business

collegeFemale Male

GenderTotal

D 3

Table 3. Gender -- Crosstabulation by College

428 98 52681.4% 18.6% 100.0%15.4% 3.5% 19.0%

9.2 -9.635 276 311

11.3% 88.7% 100.0%1.3% 10.0% 11.2%-10.0 10.5

187 11 19894.4% 5.6% 100.0%

6.7% .4% 7.1%8.2 -8.6

360 288 64855.6% 44.4% 100.0%13.0% 10.4% 23.4%

1.1 -1.226 40 66

39.4% 60.6% 100.0%.9% 1.4% 2.4%-1.5 1.5

57 112 16933.7% 66.3% 100.0%

2.1% 4.0% 6.1%-3.4 3.5

45 34 7957.0% 43.0% 100.0%

1.6% 1.2% 2.8%.6 -.6

1454 1319 277352.4% 47.6% 100.0%52.4% 47.6% 100.0%

Count% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of Total

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

Female MaleGender

Total

D 4

Table 4. Citizenship -- Crosstabulation by College

171 3 17498.3% 1.7% 100.0%

6.2% .1% 6.3%.3 -1.5

553 41 59493.1% 6.9% 100.0%20.1% 1.5% 21.6%

-.7 3.4508 10 518

98.1% 1.9% 100.0%18.4% .4% 18.8%

.5 -2.4295 16 311

94.9% 5.1% 100.0%10.7% .6% 11.3%

-.2 .9194 4 198

98.0% 2.0% 100.0%7.0% .1% 7.2%

.3 -1.4625 25 650

96.2% 3.8% 100.0%22.7% .9% 23.6%

.1 -.363 2 65

96.9% 3.1% 100.0%2.3% .1% 2.4%

.1 -.4157 9 166

94.6% 5.4% 100.0%5.7% .3% 6.0%

-.2 .9


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

collegeUS Other

citizenTotal

D 5

Table 4. Citizenship -- Crosstabulation by College

77 2 7997.5% 2.5% 100.0%

2.8% .1% 2.9%.1 -.7

2643 112 275595.9% 4.1% 100.0%95.9% 4.1% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total

US Othercitizen

Total

Table 5. Ethnicity -- Crosstabulation by College

0 2 5 165 0 3 175.0% 1.1% 2.9% 94.3% .0% 1.7% 100.0%.0% .1% .2% 6.1% .0% .1% 6.5%-1.0 -1.0 .6 .1 -.8 .3

3 18 14 535 1 4 575.5% 3.1% 2.4% 93.0% .2% .7% 100.0%.1% .7% .5% 19.8% .0% .1% 21.3%

.0 1.2 .5 .0 -.7 -1.51 12 4 489 2 6 514

.2% 2.3% .8% 95.1% .4% 1.2% 100.0%

.0% .4% .1% 18.1% .1% .2% 19.1%-1.0 .0 -2.1 .5 .2 -.5

2 5 5 283 0 3 298.7% 1.7% 1.7% 95.0% .0% 1.0% 100.0%.1% .2% .2% 10.5% .0% .1% 11.0%

.4 -.7 -.6 .3 -1.0 -.60 5 5 185 0 1 196

.0% 2.6% 2.6% 94.4% .0% .5% 100.0%

.0% .2% .2% 6.9% .0% .0% 7.3%-1.0 .2 .4 .2 -.8 -1.1


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

college

AmericanIndian orAlaskanNative Hispanic

Asian orPacific

IslanderWhite,

Non-hispanicBlack,

Non-hispanicOther,

unspecified

Ethnic

Total

D 6

Table 5. Ethnicity -- Crosstabulation by College

4 16 17 579 3 16 635.6% 2.5% 2.7% 91.2% .5% 2.5% 100.0%.1% .6% .6% 21.5% .1% .6% 23.5%

.4 .3 .9 -.5 .6 2.31 1 2 56 0 3 63

1.6% 1.6% 3.2% 88.9% .0% 4.8% 100.0%.0% .0% .1% 2.1% .0% .1% 2.3%1.2 -.4 .6 -.4 -.5 2.2

1 3 5 152 0 3 164.6% 1.8% 3.0% 92.7% .0% 1.8% 100.0%.0% .1% .2% 5.6% .0% .1% 6.1%

.2 -.4 .8 -.1 -.7 .42 1 1 71 3 0 78

2.6% 1.3% 1.3% 91.0% 3.8% .0% 100.0%.1% .0% .0% 2.6% .1% .0% 2.9%2.5 -.6 -.5 -.2 5.4 -1.114 63 58 2515 9 39 2698

.5% 2.3% 2.1% 93.2% .3% 1.4% 100.0%

.5% 2.3% 2.1% 93.2% .3% 1.4% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

AmericanIndian orAlaskanNative Hispanic

Asian orPacific

IslanderWhite,

Non-hispanicBlack,

Non-hispanicOther,

unspecified

Ethnic

Total

Table 6. Marital Status -- Crosstabulation by College

81 95 0 0 0 17646.0% 54.0% .0% .0% .0% 100.0%

2.9% 3.4% .0% .0% .0% 6.4%-.9 1.4 -1.9 -.4 -.6

265 315 16 0 2 59844.3% 52.7% 2.7% .0% .3% 100.0%

9.6% 11.4% .6% .0% .1% 21.6%-2.2 2.0 1.1 -.8 .6


Agriculture

Business

collegeSingle Married Divorced Widowed Separated

maritalsTotal

D 7

Table 6. Marital Status -- Crosstabulation by College

263 242 16 2 1 52450.2% 46.2% 3.1% .4% .2% 100.0%

9.5% 8.7% .6% .1% .0% 18.9%-.2 -.3 1.7 1.9 -.1

133 172 3 0 1 30943.0% 55.7% 1.0% .0% .3% 100.0%

4.8% 6.2% .1% .0% .0% 11.2%-1.9 2.2 -1.3 -.6 .4124 68 5 0 1 198

62.6% 34.3% 2.5% .0% .5% 100.0%4.5% 2.5% .2% .0% .0% 7.2%

2.4 -2.6 .5 -.5 .9374 261 13 0 1 649

57.6% 40.2% 2.0% .0% .2% 100.0%13.5% 9.4% .5% .0% .0% 23.5%

2.5 -2.5 .0 -.8 -.335 27 2 1 0 65

53.8% 41.5% 3.1% 1.5% .0% 100.0%1.3% 1.0% .1% .0% .0% 2.3%

.4 -.6 .6 3.5 -.480 87 1 0 0 168

47.6% 51.8% .6% .0% .0% 100.0%2.9% 3.1% .0% .0% .0% 6.1%

-.6 .9 -1.3 -.4 -.647 32 0 0 0 79

59.5% 40.5% .0% .0% .0% 100.0%1.7% 1.2% .0% .0% .0% 2.9%

1.1 -.8 -1.3 -.3 -.41402 1299 56 3 6 2766

50.7% 47.0% 2.0% .1% .2% 100.0%50.7% 47.0% 2.0% .1% .2% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

Single Married Divorced Widowed Separatedmaritals

Total

D 8

Table 7. Number of Dependents -- Crosstabulation by College

120 26 15 4 4 4 17369.4% 15.0% 8.7% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 100.0%

4.4% 1.0% .5% .1% .1% .1% 6.3%.0 -.1 .2 -.8 .6 .8

367 119 51 30 14 11 59262.0% 20.1% 8.6% 5.1% 2.4% 1.9% 100.0%13.4% 4.4% 1.9% 1.1% .5% .4% 21.7%

-2.2 2.9 .4 2.0 1.1 .6373 62 40 20 8 13 516

72.3% 12.0% 7.8% 3.9% 1.6% 2.5% 100.0%13.6% 2.3% 1.5% .7% .3% .5% 18.9%

.7 -1.9 -.4 .4 -.4 1.8179 59 38 18 9 4 307

58.3% 19.2% 12.4% 5.9% 2.9% 1.3% 100.0%6.5% 2.2% 1.4% .7% .3% .1% 11.2%

-2.4 1.7 2.6 2.2 1.6 -.3159 26 4 2 3 1 195

81.5% 13.3% 2.1% 1.0% 1.5% .5% 100.0%5.8% 1.0% .1% .1% .1% .0% 7.1%

2.0 -.7 -3.0 -1.9 -.2 -1.2495 77 46 13 5 4 640

77.3% 12.0% 7.2% 2.0% .8% .6% 100.0%18.1% 2.8% 1.7% .5% .2% .1% 23.4%

2.3 -2.2 -.9 -2.0 -1.9 -1.951 5 5 3 0 2 66

77.3% 7.6% 7.6% 4.5% .0% 3.0% 100.0%1.9% .2% .2% .1% .0% .1% 2.4%

.7 -1.6 -.2 .4 -1.1 1.0105 37 16 2 3 3 166

63.3% 22.3% 9.6% 1.2% 1.8% 1.8% 100.0%3.8% 1.4% .6% .1% .1% .1% 6.1%

-1.0 2.3 .6 -1.6 .0 .3


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

collegeZero 1 2 3 4 5 +

dependTotal

D 9

Table 7. Number of Dependents -- Crosstabulation by College

54 9 9 4 2 0 7869.2% 11.5% 11.5% 5.1% 2.6% .0% 100.0%

2.0% .3% .3% .1% .1% .0% 2.9%.0 -.9 1.0 .8 .5 -1.1

1903 420 224 96 48 42 273369.6% 15.4% 8.2% 3.5% 1.8% 1.5% 100.0%69.6% 15.4% 8.2% 3.5% 1.8% 1.5% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total

Zero 1 2 3 4 5 +depend

Total

Table 8. Age -- Crosstabulation by College

6 118 34 6 10 1 0 1753.4% 67.4% 19.4% 3.4% 5.7% .6% .0% 100.0%

.2% 4.3% 1.2% .2% .4% .0% .0% 6.3%-1.4 .1 .0 -1.0 3.3 .2 -.4

26 380 134 45 11 3 0 5994.3% 63.4% 22.4% 7.5% 1.8% .5% .0% 100.0%

.9% 13.7% 4.8% 1.6% .4% .1% .0% 21.6%-1.6 -1.0 1.7 2.6 -.4 .1 -.8

46 354 67 30 24 3 2 5268.7% 67.3% 12.7% 5.7% 4.6% .6% .4% 100.0%1.7% 12.8% 2.4% 1.1% .9% .1% .1% 19.0%

2.7 .1 -3.4 .6 3.9 .3 1.96 210 79 14 1 0 0 310

1.9% 67.7% 25.5% 4.5% .3% .0% .0% 100.0%.2% 7.6% 2.9% .5% .0% .0% .0% 11.2%-2.9 .2 2.5 -.5 -2.2 -1.2 -.6

11 160 18 5 1 2 0 1975.6% 81.2% 9.1% 2.5% .5% 1.0% .0% 100.0%

.4% 5.8% .7% .2% .0% .1% .0% 7.1%-.2 2.5 -3.3 -1.6 -1.5 1.1 -.5


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

college18 - 20 21 - 25 26 - 30 31 - 40 41 - 50 51 - 60 60 +

ageTotal

D 10

Table 8. Age -- Crosstabulation by College

30 450 134 23 7 4 1 6494.6% 69.3% 20.6% 3.5% 1.1% .6% .2% 100.0%1.1% 16.3% 4.8% .8% .3% .1% .0% 23.5%

-1.4 .7 .8 -1.8 -1.8 .5 .41 38 21 4 2 0 0 66

1.5% 57.6% 31.8% 6.1% 3.0% .0% .0% 100.0%.0% 1.4% .8% .1% .1% .0% .0% 2.4%-1.5 -.9 2.3 .3 .5 -.6 -.3

9 111 35 10 2 0 0 1675.4% 66.5% 21.0% 6.0% 1.2% .0% .0% 100.0%

.3% 4.0% 1.3% .4% .1% .0% .0% 6.0%-.3 -.1 .5 .5 -.8 -.9 -.429 31 13 5 0 0 0 78

37.2% 39.7% 16.7% 6.4% .0% .0% .0% 100.0%1.0% 1.1% .5% .2% .0% .0% .0% 2.8%11.3 -2.9 -.5 .5 -1.3 -.6 -.3164 1852 535 142 58 13 3 2767

5.9% 66.9% 19.3% 5.1% 2.1% .5% .1% 100.0%5.9% 66.9% 19.3% 5.1% 2.1% .5% .1% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

18 - 20 21 - 25 26 - 30 31 - 40 41 - 50 51 - 60 60 +age

Total

Table 9. Geographic Origin -- Crosstabulation by College

54 92 26 3 17530.9% 52.6% 14.9% 1.7% 100.0%

2.0% 3.3% .9% .1% 6.4%-2.3 2.3 .6 -1.0260 231 81 24 596

43.6% 38.8% 13.6% 4.0% 100.0%9.4% 8.4% 2.9% .9% 21.6%

.5 -1.0 .2 1.5


Agriculture

Business

collegeCache Valley

Utah, outsideCache Valley

OutsideUtah in US

Outsidethe USA

livenusu

Total

D 11

Table 9. Geographic Origin -- Crosstabulation by College

176 274 65 6 52133.8% 52.6% 12.5% 1.2% 100.0%

6.4% 10.0% 2.4% .2% 18.9%-3.0 3.9 -.5 -2.4168 96 34 13 311

54.0% 30.9% 10.9% 4.2% 100.0%6.1% 3.5% 1.2% .5% 11.3%

3.2 -2.9 -1.1 1.274 84 32 4 194

38.1% 43.3% 16.5% 2.1% 100.0%2.7% 3.1% 1.2% .1% 7.0%

-.9 .4 1.2 -.7299 232 96 18 645

46.4% 36.0% 14.9% 2.8% 100.0%10.9% 8.4% 3.5% .7% 23.4%

1.6 -2.2 1.1 -.323 33 8 2 66

34.8% 50.0% 12.1% 3.0% 100.0%.8% 1.2% .3% .1% 2.4%

-.9 1.1 -.3 .084 55 18 10 167

50.3% 32.9% 10.8% 6.0% 100.0%3.1% 2.0% .7% .4% 6.1%

1.6 -1.7 -.9 2.324 46 6 2 78

30.8% 59.0% 7.7% 2.6% 100.0%.9% 1.7% .2% .1% 2.8%-1.6 2.4 -1.4 -.2

1162 1143 366 82 275342.2% 41.5% 13.3% 3.0% 100.0%42.2% 41.5% 13.3% 3.0% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

Cache ValleyUtah, outsideCache Valley

OutsideUtah in US

Outsidethe USA

livenusu

Total

D 12

Tabel 10. Length of Attendance at USU -- Crosstabulation by College

0 5 31 53 46 28 12 175.0% 2.9% 17.7% 30.3% 26.3% 16.0% 6.9% 100.0%.0% .2% 1.1% 1.9% 1.7% 1.0% .4% 6.4%

-.8 .8 -.1 2.1 -.9 -.9 -.52 14 106 115 196 108 57 598

.3% 2.3% 17.7% 19.2% 32.8% 18.1% 9.5% 100.0%

.1% .5% 3.8% 4.2% 7.1% 3.9% 2.1% 21.7%-.3 .5 -.1 -1.8 1.3 -.6 1.4

4 13 124 141 133 84 22 521.8% 2.5% 23.8% 27.1% 25.5% 16.1% 4.2% 100.0%.1% .5% 4.5% 5.1% 4.8% 3.0% .8% 18.9%1.3 .7 3.1 2.1 -1.8 -1.5 -3.0

0 0 32 69 83 94 31 309.0% .0% 10.4% 22.3% 26.9% 30.4% 10.0% 100.0%.0% .0% 1.2% 2.5% 3.0% 3.4% 1.1% 11.2%-1.1 -2.5 -3.2 -.1 -1.0 4.6 1.3

0 1 46 52 63 23 11 196.0% .5% 23.5% 26.5% 32.1% 11.7% 5.6% 100.0%.0% .0% 1.7% 1.9% 2.3% .8% .4% 7.1%

-.9 -1.5 1.8 1.1 .6 -2.3 -1.13 20 91 139 208 135 51 647

.5% 3.1% 14.1% 21.5% 32.1% 20.9% 7.9% 100.0%

.1% .7% 3.3% 5.0% 7.5% 4.9% 1.9% 23.5%.3 1.9 -2.3 -.7 1.0 1.1 .00 1 13 14 15 12 10 65

.0% 1.5% 20.0% 21.5% 23.1% 18.5% 15.4% 100.0%

.0% .0% .5% .5% .5% .4% .4% 2.4%-.5 -.3 .4 -.2 -1.0 -.1 2.1

1 2 26 27 69 28 15 168.6% 1.2% 15.5% 16.1% 41.1% 16.7% 8.9% 100.0%.0% .1% .9% 1.0% 2.5% 1.0% .5% 6.1%

.4 -.8 -.8 -1.8 2.6 -.7 .5


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

college<1 1 2 3 4 5 6 +

lengattdTotal

D 13

Tabel 10. Length of Attendance at USU -- Crosstabulation by College

1 0 26 16 11 13 9 761.3% .0% 34.2% 21.1% 14.5% 17.1% 11.8% 100.0%

.0% .0% .9% .6% .4% .5% .3% 2.8%1.3 -1.2 3.3 -.3 -2.5 -.4 1.211 56 495 626 824 525 218 2755

.4% 2.0% 18.0% 22.7% 29.9% 19.1% 7.9% 100.0%

.4% 2.0% 18.0% 22.7% 29.9% 19.1% 7.9% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total

<1 1 2 3 4 5 6 +lengattd

Total

Table 11. Where respondent has taken the majority of their classes -- Crosstabulation by College

15 130 29 1748.6% 74.7% 16.7% 100.0%

.5% 4.7% 1.1% 6.4%-.1 -1.0 3.145 478 70 593

7.6% 80.6% 11.8% 100.0%1.6% 17.5% 2.6% 21.7%

-1.1 -.3 1.951 385 84 520

9.8% 74.0% 16.2% 100.0%1.9% 14.1% 3.1% 19.0%

.7 -1.9 5.022 282 4 308

7.1% 91.6% 1.3% 100.0%.8% 10.3% .1% 11.2%-1.0 1.9 -4.6

17 165 13 1958.7% 84.6% 6.7% 100.0%

.6% 6.0% .5% 7.1%-.1 .5 -1.3


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

college

Anothercollege/uni

versityLogan

Campus

Other USUlocations

(e.g. Moab,Roosevelt)

majclass

Total

D 14

Table 11. Where respondent has taken the majority of their classes -- Crosstabulation by College

65 563 13 64110.1% 87.8% 2.0% 100.0%

2.4% 20.6% .5% 23.4%1.0 1.7 -6.1

8 56 0 6412.5% 87.5% .0% 100.0%

.3% 2.0% .0% 2.3%1.0 .5 -2.517 138 13 168

10.1% 82.1% 7.7% 100.0%.6% 5.0% .5% 6.1%

.5 .1 -.74 39 32 75

5.3% 52.0% 42.7% 100.0%.1% 1.4% 1.2% 2.7%-1.0 -2.8 9.4244 2236 258 2738

8.9% 81.7% 9.4% 100.0%8.9% 81.7% 9.4% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

Anothercollege/uni

versityLogan

Campus

Other USUlocations

(e.g. Moab,Roosevelt)

majclass

Total

Table 12. Do you plan to continue your education -- Crosstabulation by College

73 29 74 17641.5% 16.5% 42.0% 100.0%

2.6% 1.0% 2.7% 6.4%-2.3 1.6 2.0341 70 189 600

56.8% 11.7% 31.5% 100.0%12.3% 2.5% 6.8% 21.7%

.8 -.4 -.8


Agriculture

Business

collegeYes No Undecided

plantoTotal

D 15

Table 12. Do you plan to continue your education -- Crosstabulation by College

301 56 168 52557.3% 10.7% 32.0% 100.0%10.9% 2.0% 6.1% 19.0%

.9 -1.1 -.5177 48 86 311

56.9% 15.4% 27.7% 100.0%6.4% 1.7% 3.1% 11.2%

.6 1.6 -1.769 38 90 197

35.0% 19.3% 45.7% 100.0%2.5% 1.4% 3.3% 7.1%

-3.7 2.8 3.0356 73 217 646

55.1% 11.3% 33.6% 100.0%12.9% 2.6% 7.8% 23.3%

.2 -.7 .128 8 29 65

43.1% 12.3% 44.6% 100.0%1.0% .3% 1.0% 2.3%

-1.2 .0 1.6105 16 48 169

62.1% 9.5% 28.4% 100.0%3.8% .6% 1.7% 6.1%

1.4 -1.0 -1.156 2 20 78

71.8% 2.6% 25.6% 100.0%2.0% .1% .7% 2.8%

2.1 -2.4 -1.21506 340 921 2767

54.4% 12.3% 33.3% 100.0%54.4% 12.3% 33.3% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

Yes No Undecidedplanto

Total

D 16

Table 13. Current employment status -- Crosstabulation by College

46 99 30 17526.3% 56.6% 17.1% 100.0%

1.7% 3.6% 1.1% 6.4%2.0 .3 -2.2

184 265 146 59530.9% 44.5% 24.5% 100.0%

6.7% 9.6% 5.3% 21.6%6.3 -3.4 -.660 296 163 519

11.6% 57.0% 31.4% 100.0%2.2% 10.8% 5.9% 18.9%

-4.1 .7 2.656 187 67 310

18.1% 60.3% 21.6% 100.0%2.0% 6.8% 2.4% 11.3%

-.6 1.3 -1.429 114 53 196

14.8% 58.2% 27.0% 100.0%1.1% 4.1% 1.9% 7.1%

-1.5 .6 .4118 379 148 645

18.3% 58.8% 22.9% 100.0%4.3% 13.8% 5.4% 23.5%

-.7 1.4 -1.48 40 17 65

12.3% 61.5% 26.2% 100.0%.3% 1.5% .6% 2.4%-1.3 .7 .1

18 94 54 16610.8% 56.6% 32.5% 100.0%

.7% 3.4% 2.0% 6.0%-2.5 .3 1.7


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

college

Employedfull-time

Employedpart-time Unemployed

employst

Total

D 17

Table 13. Current employment status -- Crosstabulation by College

17 33 28 7821.8% 42.3% 35.9% 100.0%

.6% 1.2% 1.0% 2.8%.5 -1.5 1.8

536 1507 706 274919.5% 54.8% 25.7% 100.0%19.5% 54.8% 25.7% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total

Employedfull-time

Employedpart-time Unemployed

employst

Total

Table 14. Amount of time worked -- Crosstabulation by College

14 44 50 29 39 1768.0% 25.0% 28.4% 16.5% 22.2% 100.0%

.5% 1.6% 1.8% 1.1% 1.4% 6.4%-2.0 1.4 -1.2 .0 1.9

79 80 177 104 156 59613.3% 13.4% 29.7% 17.4% 26.2% 100.0%

2.9% 2.9% 6.4% 3.8% 5.7% 21.6%-.1 -3.7 -1.6 .5 6.074 111 169 100 67 521

14.2% 21.3% 32.4% 19.2% 12.9% 100.0%2.7% 4.0% 6.1% 3.6% 2.4% 18.9%

.5 .5 -.4 1.5 -1.946 72 120 40 32 310

14.8% 23.2% 38.7% 12.9% 10.3% 100.0%1.7% 2.6% 4.4% 1.5% 1.2% 11.3%

.7 1.2 1.6 -1.6 -2.623 43 68 34 27 195

11.8% 22.1% 34.9% 17.4% 13.8% 100.0%.8% 1.6% 2.5% 1.2% 1.0% 7.1%

-.6 .6 .3 .3 -.8


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

collegeNone 1/4 time 1/2 time 3/4 time Full-time

amtworkTotal

D 18

Table 14. Amount of time worked -- Crosstabulation by College

72 132 236 114 89 64311.2% 20.5% 36.7% 17.7% 13.8% 100.0%

2.6% 4.8% 8.6% 4.1% 3.2% 23.4%-1.5 .1 1.4 .7 -1.5

11 18 22 9 5 6516.9% 27.7% 33.8% 13.8% 7.7% 100.0%

.4% .7% .8% .3% .2% 2.4%.8 1.3 .0 -.5 -1.7

31 38 65 18 17 16918.3% 22.5% 38.5% 10.7% 10.1% 100.0%

1.1% 1.4% 2.4% .7% .6% 6.1%1.8 .6 1.1 -1.9 -2.018 20 16 8 16 78

23.1% 25.6% 20.5% 10.3% 20.5% 100.0%.7% .7% .6% .3% .6% 2.8%2.3 1.1 -2.0 -1.4 .9

368 558 923 456 448 275313.4% 20.3% 33.5% 16.6% 16.3% 100.0%13.4% 20.3% 33.5% 16.6% 16.3% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

None 1/4 time 1/2 time 3/4 time Full-timeamtwork

Total

Table 15. Is worked related to your degree -- Crosstabulation by College

93 56 14962.4% 37.6% 100.0%

4.2% 2.6% 6.8%3.4 -3.0

227 256 48347.0% 53.0% 100.0%10.4% 11.7% 22.0%

1.0 -.9


Agriculture

Business

college

related to yourdegree?

unrelated toyour degree?

workrela

Total

D 19

Table 15. Is worked related to your degree -- Crosstabulation by College

147 243 39037.7% 62.3% 100.0%

6.7% 11.1% 17.8%-1.9 1.7149 110 259

57.5% 42.5% 100.0%6.8% 5.0% 11.8%

3.3 -2.948 102 150

32.0% 68.0% 100.0%2.2% 4.7% 6.8%

-2.2 2.0186 341 527

35.3% 64.7% 100.0%8.5% 15.6% 24.0%

-3.0 2.725 28 53

47.2% 52.8% 100.0%1.1% 1.3% 2.4%

.3 -.371 56 127

55.9% 44.1% 100.0%3.2% 2.6% 5.8%

2.0 -1.820 34 54

37.0% 63.0% 100.0%.9% 1.6% 2.5%

-.8 .7966 1226 2192

44.1% 55.9% 100.0%44.1% 55.9% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

related to yourdegree?

unrelated toyour degree?

workrela

Total

D 20

Table 16. Career-related Practical Experience -- Crosstabulation by College

63 26 57 15 13 17436.2% 14.9% 32.8% 8.6% 7.5% 100.0%

2.3% 1.0% 2.1% .5% .5% 6.4%.6 -.4 2.2 1.2 -3.7

166 65 179 24 156 59028.1% 11.0% 30.3% 4.1% 26.4% 100.0%

6.1% 2.4% 6.5% .9% 5.7% 21.6%-2.2 -3.1 2.9 -2.2 3.6239 135 80 32 31 517

46.2% 26.1% 15.5% 6.2% 6.0% 100.0%8.7% 4.9% 2.9% 1.2% 1.1% 18.9%

5.1 5.7 -4.1 -.1 -7.1104 16 92 19 79 310

33.5% 5.2% 29.7% 6.1% 25.5% 100.0%3.8% .6% 3.4% .7% 2.9% 11.3%

.1 -4.8 1.9 -.1 2.2122 28 27 13 4 194

62.9% 14.4% 13.9% 6.7% 2.1% 100.0%4.5% 1.0% 1.0% .5% .1% 7.1%

7.1 -.6 -2.9 .2 -5.6153 116 157 42 174 642

23.8% 18.1% 24.5% 6.5% 27.1% 100.0%5.6% 4.2% 5.7% 1.5% 6.4% 23.5%

-4.2 1.2 .0 .2 4.112 13 16 7 18 66

18.2% 19.7% 24.2% 10.6% 27.3% 100.0%.4% .5% .6% .3% .7% 2.4%-2.1 .7 .0 1.4 1.4

41 28 43 14 40 16624.7% 16.9% 25.9% 8.4% 24.1% 100.0%

1.5% 1.0% 1.6% .5% 1.5% 6.1%-1.9 .2 .4 1.1 1.2


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

college

Practicum/internship

Volunteerexperiences Employment Work-study None

carrelat

Total

D 21

Table 16. Career-related Practical Experience -- Crosstabulation by College

12 13 15 7 27 7416.2% 17.6% 20.3% 9.5% 36.5% 100.0%

.4% .5% .5% .3% 1.0% 2.7%-2.6 .3 -.7 1.1 3.2912 440 666 173 542 2733

33.4% 16.1% 24.4% 6.3% 19.8% 100.0%33.4% 16.1% 24.4% 6.3% 19.8% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total

Practicum/internship

Volunteerexperiences Employment Work-study None

carrelat

Total

Table 17. What student tell their friends about USU -- Crosstabulation by College

82 71 15 3 2 17347.4% 41.0% 8.7% 1.7% 1.2% 100.0%

3.0% 2.6% .5% .1% .1% 6.3%1.7 -.5 -1.8 -.4 .2

210 274 92 14 4 59435.4% 46.1% 15.5% 2.4% .7% 100.0%

7.6% 10.0% 3.4% .5% .1% 21.6%-1.6 1.0 1.1 .3 -.8256 203 56 4 2 521

49.1% 39.0% 10.7% .8% .4% 100.0%9.3% 7.4% 2.0% .1% .1% 19.0%

3.5 -1.6 -1.9 -2.2 -1.4103 146 46 10 5 310

33.2% 47.1% 14.8% 3.2% 1.6% 100.0%3.8% 5.3% 1.7% .4% .2% 11.3%

-1.8 1.0 .5 1.3 1.1

Count% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. Residual

Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

college

It's great;come hereto school

Mostlypositivethings

Nothingmuch,

positive ornegative

Mostlynegative

things

It's not great;don't come

here to school

tellausu

Total

D 22

Table 17. What student tell their friends about USU -- Crosstabulation by College

101 72 19 2 2 19651.5% 36.7% 9.7% 1.0% 1.0% 100.0%

3.7% 2.6% .7% .1% .1% 7.1%2.7 -1.4 -1.6 -1.1 .1

222 295 103 14 8 64234.6% 46.0% 16.0% 2.2% 1.2% 100.0%

8.1% 10.7% 3.8% .5% .3% 23.4%-2.0 .9 1.5 .1 .7

17 31 11 4 2 6526.2% 47.7% 16.9% 6.2% 3.1% 100.0%

.6% 1.1% .4% .1% .1% 2.4%-1.7 .5 .7 2.2 1.7

62 75 24 5 2 16836.9% 44.6% 14.3% 3.0% 1.2% 100.0%

2.3% 2.7% .9% .2% .1% 6.1%-.5 .2 .1 .7 .331 28 15 3 0 77

40.3% 36.4% 19.5% 3.9% .0% 100.0%1.1% 1.0% .5% .1% .0% 2.8%

.1 -1.0 1.3 1.0 -.91084 1195 381 59 27 2746

39.5% 43.5% 13.9% 2.1% 1.0% 100.0%39.5% 43.5% 13.9% 2.1% 1.0% 100.0%

Count% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of Total

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

It's great;come hereto school

Mostlypositivethings

Nothingmuch,

positive ornegative

Mostlynegative

things

It's not great;don't come

here to school

tellausu

Total

Tabel 18. How many semester have you been assigned this advisor -- Crosstabulation by College

11 15 33 46 67 1726.4% 8.7% 19.2% 26.7% 39.0% 100.0%

.4% .6% 1.2% 1.7% 2.5% 6.4%-1.8 -2.6 1.1 .3 1.9

Count% within college% of TotalStd. Residual

Agriculturecollege1 semester 2 semesters 3 semesters 4 semesters 5+ semesters

assigadvTotal

D 23

Tabel 18. How many semester have you been assigned this advisor -- Crosstabulation by College

111 161 87 117 96 57219.4% 28.1% 15.2% 20.5% 16.8% 100.0%

4.2% 6.0% 3.3% 4.4% 3.6% 21.4%6.3 6.5 -.4 -2.4 -6.123 43 77 161 213 517

4.4% 8.3% 14.9% 31.1% 41.2% 100.0%.9% 1.6% 2.9% 6.0% 8.0% 19.4%-4.4 -4.8 -.5 2.5 4.2

15 57 47 73 109 3015.0% 18.9% 15.6% 24.3% 36.2% 100.0%

.6% 2.1% 1.8% 2.7% 4.1% 11.3%-3.1 .8 -.1 -.4 1.7

15 25 44 60 50 1947.7% 12.9% 22.7% 30.9% 25.8% 100.0%

.6% .9% 1.6% 2.2% 1.9% 7.3%-1.3 -1.4 2.4 1.5 -1.3

80 103 95 157 183 61812.9% 16.7% 15.4% 25.4% 29.6% 100.0%

3.0% 3.9% 3.6% 5.9% 6.9% 23.2%1.6 -.2 -.3 -.1 -.6

3 10 10 17 25 654.6% 15.4% 15.4% 26.2% 38.5% 100.0%

.1% .4% .4% .6% .9% 2.4%-1.5 -.3 -.1 .1 1.1

20 25 17 36 62 16012.5% 15.6% 10.6% 22.5% 38.8% 100.0%

.7% .9% .6% 1.3% 2.3% 6.0%.7 -.4 -1.7 -.8 1.8

10 13 13 15 19 7014.3% 18.6% 18.6% 21.4% 27.1% 100.0%

.4% .5% .5% .6% .7% 2.6%.9 .3 .6 -.7 -.6

288 452 423 682 824 266910.8% 16.9% 15.8% 25.6% 30.9% 100.0%10.8% 16.9% 15.8% 25.6% 30.9% 100.0%

Count% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of TotalStd. ResidualCount% within college% of Total

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

1 semester 2 semesters 3 semesters 4 semesters 5+ semestersassigadv

Total

D 24

Table 19. Reasons for not seeing advisor more than once -- Crosstabulation by College

4 15 4 0 11 2 3611.1% 41.7% 11.1% .0% 30.6% 5.6% 100.0%

.5% 2.0% .5% .0% 1.5% .3% 4.8%-.8 1.5 -1.7 -1.6 2.4 -.632 67 49 17 40 13 218

14.7% 30.7% 22.5% 7.8% 18.3% 6.0% 100.0%4.2% 8.9% 6.5% 2.3% 5.3% 1.7% 28.9%

-.5 .6 -.7 .4 1.3 -1.23 22 10 5 27 12 79

3.8% 27.8% 12.7% 6.3% 34.2% 15.2% 100.0%.4% 2.9% 1.3% .7% 3.6% 1.6% 10.5%-2.7 -.1 -2.2 -.3 4.5 2.1

29 25 43 7 5 10 11924.4% 21.0% 36.1% 5.9% 4.2% 8.4% 100.0%

3.8% 3.3% 5.7% .9% .7% 1.3% 15.8%2.2 -1.6 2.5 -.5 -3.0 .0

3 16 10 3 5 2 397.7% 41.0% 25.6% 7.7% 12.8% 5.1% 100.0%

.4% 2.1% 1.3% .4% .7% .3% 5.2%-1.3 1.4 .1 .1 -.3 -.7

35 55 48 17 15 15 18518.9% 29.7% 25.9% 9.2% 8.1% 8.1% 100.0%

4.6% 7.3% 6.4% 2.3% 2.0% 2.0% 24.5%.9 .3 .3 1.0 -2.4 -.12 2 0 0 3 0 7

28.6% 28.6% .0% .0% 42.9% .0% 100.0%.3% .3% .0% .0% .4% .0% .9%

.8 .0 -1.3 -.7 1.9 -.88 9 14 3 1 8 43

18.6% 20.9% 32.6% 7.0% 2.3% 18.6% 100.0%1.1% 1.2% 1.9% .4% .1% 1.1% 5.7%

.4 -.9 1.0 .0 -2.1 2.3


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

college

Did notthink it wasnecessary

Got theinformation I

wanted/


wanted /

Did not knowwho my

advisor was

My advisorkept meinformed

Did not getinformation I

wanted/

nevermet

Total

D 25

Table 19. Reasons for not seeing advisor more than once -- Crosstabulation by College

6 5 10 2 5 1 2920.7% 17.2% 34.5% 6.9% 17.2% 3.4% 100.0%

.8% .7% 1.3% .3% .7% .1% 3.8%.6 -1.1 1.0 -.1 .3 -.9

122 216 188 54 112 63 75516.2% 28.6% 24.9% 7.2% 14.8% 8.3% 100.0%16.2% 28.6% 24.9% 7.2% 14.8% 8.3% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total

Did notthink it wasnecessary


wanted/


wanted /

Did not knowwho my

advisor was

My advisorkept meinformed

Did not getinformation I

wanted/

nevermet

Total

Table 20. Would visit with advisor more, if there were no obstacles -- Crosstabulation by College

56 97 15336.6% 63.4% 100.0%

2.2% 3.9% 6.1%-1.9 1.8249 294 543

45.9% 54.1% 100.0%9.9% 11.7% 21.6%

-.5 .5249 223 472

52.8% 47.2% 100.0%9.9% 8.9% 18.8%

1.7 -1.6132 162 294

44.9% 55.1% 100.0%5.3% 6.5% 11.7%

-.6 .696 95 191

50.3% 49.7% 100.0%3.8% 3.8% 7.6%

.6 -.5


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

collegeYes No

visitmorTotal

D 26

Table 20. Would visit with advisor more, if there were no obstacles -- Crosstabulation by College

287 288 57549.9% 50.1% 100.0%11.4% 11.5% 22.9%

.9 -.825 33 58

43.1% 56.9% 100.0%1.0% 1.3% 2.3%

-.5 .550 103 153

32.7% 67.3% 100.0%2.0% 4.1% 6.1%

-2.6 2.546 25 71

64.8% 35.2% 100.0%1.8% 1.0% 2.8%

2.1 -2.01190 1320 2510

47.4% 52.6% 100.0%47.4% 52.6% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

Yes Novisitmor

Total

Table 21. Number of times you have changed your major -- Crosstabulation by College

79 65 15 9 2 17046.5% 38.2% 8.8% 5.3% 1.2% 100.0%

2.9% 2.4% .6% .3% .1% 6.3%.3 .0 -.9 .4 .1

220 248 75 32 8 58337.7% 42.5% 12.9% 5.5% 1.4% 100.0%

8.1% 9.2% 2.8% 1.2% .3% 21.6%-2.6 1.7 1.2 1.0 .6


Agriculture

Business

collegeNever 1 time 2 times 3 times 4+ times

changmajTotal

D 27

Table 21. Number of times you have changed your major -- Crosstabulation by College

256 192 51 17 3 51949.3% 37.0% 9.8% 3.3% .6% 100.0%

9.5% 7.1% 1.9% .6% .1% 19.2%1.5 -.5 -.9 -1.4 -1.1

191 87 18 7 3 30662.4% 28.4% 5.9% 2.3% 1.0% 100.0%

7.1% 3.2% .7% .3% .1% 11.3%4.6 -2.8 -2.8 -1.9 -.264 92 28 8 5 197

32.5% 46.7% 14.2% 4.1% 2.5% 100.0%2.4% 3.4% 1.0% .3% .2% 7.3%

-2.6 1.9 1.3 -.4 1.9250 263 73 35 7 628

39.8% 41.9% 11.6% 5.6% 1.1% 100.0%9.2% 9.7% 2.7% 1.3% .3% 23.2%

-1.9 1.5 .3 1.1 .030 26 7 2 0 65

46.2% 40.0% 10.8% 3.1% .0% 100.0%1.1% 1.0% .3% .1% .0% 2.4%

.2 .2 -.1 -.6 -.893 44 21 6 0 164

56.7% 26.8% 12.8% 3.7% .0% 100.0%3.4% 1.6% .8% .2% .0% 6.1%

2.3 -2.4 .6 -.6 -1.329 18 15 9 2 73

39.7% 24.7% 20.5% 12.3% 2.7% 100.0%1.1% .7% .6% .3% .1% 2.7%

-.6 -1.9 2.4 3.1 1.31212 1035 303 125 30 2705

44.8% 38.3% 11.2% 4.6% 1.1% 100.0%44.8% 38.3% 11.2% 4.6% 1.1% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

Never 1 time 2 times 3 times 4+ timeschangmaj

Total

D 28

Table 22. In an ideal system I could make an appointment with my advisor -- Crosstabulation by College

52 83 34 16930.8% 49.1% 20.1% 100.0%

1.9% 3.1% 1.3% 6.3%.3 -1.1 1.6

187 322 69 57832.4% 55.7% 11.9% 100.0%

7.0% 12.0% 2.6% 21.5%1.3 .1 -2.0

160 271 83 51431.1% 52.7% 16.1% 100.0%

6.0% 10.1% 3.1% 19.2%.7 -.8 .5

77 189 36 30225.5% 62.6% 11.9% 100.0%

2.9% 7.0% 1.3% 11.3%-1.3 1.7 -1.5

60 99 37 19630.6% 50.5% 18.9% 100.0%

2.2% 3.7% 1.4% 7.3%.3 -.9 1.3

171 354 101 62627.3% 56.5% 16.1% 100.0%

6.4% 13.2% 3.8% 23.3%-1.0 .4 .6

11 44 10 6516.9% 67.7% 15.4% 100.0%

.4% 1.6% .4% 2.4%-1.9 1.3 .0

60 89 13 16237.0% 54.9% 8.0% 100.0%

2.2% 3.3% .5% 6.0%1.8 -.1 -2.4


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

college

1 hour inadvance

1 day inadvance

1 week inadvance

makeappt

Total

D 29

Table 22. In an ideal system I could make an appointment with my advisor -- Crosstabulation by College

14 32 26 7219.4% 44.4% 36.1% 100.0%

.5% 1.2% 1.0% 2.7%-1.6 -1.2 4.5792 1483 409 2684

29.5% 55.3% 15.2% 100.0%29.5% 55.3% 15.2% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total

1 hour inadvance

1 day inadvance

1 week inadvance

makeappt

Total

D 30

Table 23. If there were no obstacles I would visit with my advisor -- Crosstabulation by College

4 3 28 39 79 132.4% 1.8% 16.6% 23.1% 46.7% 7.7%

.1% .1% 1.0% 1.4% 2.9% .5%-.1 -.8 -.5 1.4 .3 -.7

8 20 91 95 295 711.3% 3.3% 15.2% 15.9% 49.3% 11.9%

.3% .7% 3.4% 3.5% 10.9% 2.6%-1.8 .9 -1.8 -1.4 1.4 2.0

15 16 113 120 209 223.0% 3.1% 22.2% 23.6% 41.1% 4.3%

.6% .6% 4.2% 4.4% 7.7% .8%.7 .6 2.0 2.7 -1.4 -3.74 5 41 46 151 38

1.3% 1.6% 13.4% 15.1% 49.5% 12.5%.1% .2% 1.5% 1.7% 5.6% 1.4%-1.3 -1.2 -2.0 -1.4 1.1 1.8

1 3 42 37 92 11.5% 1.6% 22.0% 19.4% 48.2% 5.8%.0% .1% 1.5% 1.4% 3.4% .4%-1.7 -1.0 1.2 .3 .6 -1.6

27 17 123 112 276 594.3% 2.7% 19.4% 17.7% 43.6% 9.3%1.0% .6% 4.5% 4.1% 10.2% 2.2%

2.9 -.1 .6 -.4 -.7 .03 3 20 9 26 4

4.5% 4.5% 30.3% 13.6% 39.4% 6.1%.1% .1% .7% .3% 1.0% .1%1.1 .9 2.3 -.9 -.7 -.9

2 5 19 28 77 311.2% 3.0% 11.3% 16.7% 45.8% 18.5%

.1% .2% .7% 1.0% 2.8% 1.1%-1.1 .2 -2.1 -.5 .1 3.9


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

collegeWeekly

Every otherweek Monthly

Every couplemonths

Eachsemester Once a year

visitwhen

D 31


3 2 21 13 26 44.1% 2.7% 28.8% 17.8% 35.6% 5.5%

.1% .1% .8% .5% 1.0% .1%.9 .0 2.1 -.1 -1.2 -1.1

67 74 498 499 1231 2532.5% 2.7% 18.4% 18.4% 45.4% 9.3%2.5% 2.7% 18.4% 18.4% 45.4% 9.3%


Othercollege

Total

WeeklyEvery other

week MonthlyEvery couple

monthsEach

semester Once a year

visitwhen

D 32


3 1691.8% 100.0%

.1% 6.2%-1.1

18 5983.0% 100.0%

.7% 22.1%-.413 508

2.6% 100.0%.5% 18.7%

-.920 305

6.6% 100.0%.7% 11.3%3.2

5 1912.6% 100.0%

.2% 7.0%-.519 633

3.0% 100.0%.7% 23.3%

-.41 66

1.5% 100.0%.0% 2.4%

-.86 168

3.6% 100.0%.2% 6.2%

.2


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

collegeNever

visitwhen

Total

D 33


4 735.5% 100.0%

.1% 2.7%1.089 2711

3.3% 100.0%3.3% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total

Never

visitwhen

Total

Table 24. Average length of advising appointments -- Crosstabulation by College

58 79 35 2 17433.3% 45.4% 20.1% 1.1% 100.0%

2.2% 2.9% 1.3% .1% 6.5%-1.0 -.3 3.0 -1.3299 243 42 5 589

50.8% 41.3% 7.1% .8% 100.0%11.1% 9.0% 1.6% .2% 21.8%

5.1 -2.1 -3.5 -2.8155 282 61 10 508

30.5% 55.5% 12.0% 2.0% 100.0%5.7% 10.5% 2.3% .4% 18.8%

-2.7 2.7 -.1 -1.1125 124 34 11 294

42.5% 42.2% 11.6% 3.7% 100.0%4.6% 4.6% 1.3% .4% 10.9%

1.3 -1.2 -.3 1.057 95 37 3 192

29.7% 49.5% 19.3% 1.6% 100.0%2.1% 3.5% 1.4% .1% 7.1%

-1.8 .5 2.8 -1.0


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

college1-10 minutes

11-20minutes

21-30minutes

30 or moreminutes

lengappt

Total

D 34

Table 24. Average length of advising appointments -- Crosstabulation by College

218 307 81 28 63434.4% 48.4% 12.8% 4.4% 100.0%

8.1% 11.4% 3.0% 1.0% 23.5%-1.4 .5 .4 2.5

9 32 12 13 6613.6% 48.5% 18.2% 19.7% 100.0%

.3% 1.2% .4% .5% 2.4%-3.2 .2 1.4 8.2

80 74 14 1 16947.3% 43.8% 8.3% .6% 100.0%

3.0% 2.7% .5% .0% 6.3%2.0 -.6 -1.5 -1.720 36 13 2 71

28.2% 50.7% 18.3% 2.8% 100.0%.7% 1.3% .5% .1% 2.6%-1.3 .4 1.5 .0

1021 1272 329 75 269737.9% 47.2% 12.2% 2.8% 100.0%37.9% 47.2% 12.2% 2.8% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

1-10 minutes11-20

minutes21-30

minutes30 or more

minutes

lengappt

Total

D 35

Table 25. Number of times respondents met with advisor -- Crosstabulation by College

4 21 35 42 29 16 11 22.3% 12.1% 20.2% 24.3% 16.8% 9.2% 6.4% 1.2%

.1% .8% 1.3% 1.5% 1.1% .6% .4% .1%-2.9 -1.4 -.7 1.1 1.0 .9 1.5 .1

46 98 153 127 73 45 25 77.7% 16.4% 25.7% 21.3% 12.2% 7.6% 4.2% 1.2%1.7% 3.6% 5.6% 4.7% 2.7% 1.7% .9% .3%

-1.0 .1 1.4 .4 -1.1 .1 .1 .318 55 115 108 94 51 31 9

3.5% 10.8% 22.5% 21.1% 18.4% 10.0% 6.1% 1.8%.7% 2.0% 4.2% 4.0% 3.5% 1.9% 1.1% .3%-4.1 -3.1 -.2 .3 2.7 2.2 2.2 1.5

89 60 60 40 29 11 6 229.2% 19.7% 19.7% 13.1% 9.5% 3.6% 2.0% .7%

3.3% 2.2% 2.2% 1.5% 1.1% .4% .2% .1%11.9 1.5 -1.2 -2.9 -2.1 -2.4 -1.8 -.7

10 33 47 49 26 12 8 25.2% 17.0% 24.2% 25.3% 13.4% 6.2% 4.1% 1.0%

.4% 1.2% 1.7% 1.8% 1.0% .4% .3% .1%-1.7 .2 .4 1.4 -.2 -.6 .0 .0

39 140 151 139 81 34 13 66.1% 22.0% 23.7% 21.9% 12.7% 5.3% 2.0% .9%1.4% 5.1% 5.5% 5.1% 3.0% 1.2% .5% .2%

-2.3 3.6 .5 .7 -.9 -1.9 -2.5 -.32 5 16 12 10 7 5 1

3.0% 7.6% 24.2% 18.2% 15.2% 10.6% 7.6% 1.5%.1% .2% .6% .4% .4% .3% .2% .0%-1.6 -1.8 .2 -.4 .3 1.0 1.4 .4

23 26 34 23 25 17 11 013.8% 15.6% 20.4% 13.8% 15.0% 10.2% 6.6% .0%

.8% 1.0% 1.2% .8% .9% .6% .4% .0%2.1 -.2 -.7 -1.9 .3 1.3 1.6 -1.3


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

collegeNever 1 time 2 times 3 times 4 times 5 times 6 times 7 times

timesmet

D 36


11 6 12 20 14 8 1 014.9% 8.1% 16.2% 27.0% 18.9% 10.8% 1.4% .0%

.4% .2% .4% .7% .5% .3% .0% .0%1.7 -1.7 -1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 -1.2 -.9

242 444 623 560 381 201 111 298.9% 16.3% 22.9% 20.6% 14.0% 7.4% 4.1% 1.1%8.9% 16.3% 22.9% 20.6% 14.0% 7.4% 4.1% 1.1%


Othercollege

Total

Never 1 time 2 times 3 times 4 times 5 times 6 times 7 timestimesmet

D 37


4 1 8 1732.3% .6% 4.6% 100.0%

.1% .0% .3% 6.4%.7 .7 1.3

10 0 12 5961.7% .0% 2.0% 100.0%

.4% .0% .4% 21.9%.1 -1.3 -1.3

14 2 14 5112.7% .4% 2.7% 100.0%

.5% .1% .5% 18.8%2.0 .4 -.2

3 0 5 3051.0% .0% 1.6% 100.0%

.1% .0% .2% 11.2%-.9 -.9 -1.3

3 0 4 1941.5% .0% 2.1% 100.0%

.1% .0% .1% 7.1%-.1 -.8 -.7

7 4 22 6361.1% .6% 3.5% 100.0%

.3% .1% .8% 23.4%-1.0 1.6 .8

1 1 6 661.5% 1.5% 9.1% 100.0%

.0% .0% .2% 2.4%-.1 1.8 3.0

2 0 6 1671.2% .0% 3.6% 100.0%

.1% .0% .2% 6.1%-.4 -.7 .5


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

college8 times 9 times 10 + times

timesmetTotal

D 38


0 0 2 74.0% .0% 2.7% 100.0%.0% .0% .1% 2.7%-1.1 -.5 -.1

44 8 79 27221.6% .3% 2.9% 100.0%1.6% .3% 2.9% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total

8 times 9 times 10 + timestimesmet

Total

Table 26. Major source of academic information -- Crosstabulation by College

97 3 10 55 4 3 17256.4% 1.7% 5.8% 32.0% 2.3% 1.7% 100.0%

3.6% .1% .4% 2.0% .1% .1% 6.3%3.7 -2.4 .8 -2.1 -1.6 -.9

193 24 27 314 23 19 60032.2% 4.0% 4.5% 52.3% 3.8% 3.2% 100.0%

7.1% .9% 1.0% 11.5% .8% .7% 22.0%-2.6 -2.3 .0 3.7 -1.3 .3292 22 12 148 26 12 512

57.0% 4.3% 2.3% 28.9% 5.1% 2.3% 100.0%10.7% .8% .4% 5.4% 1.0% .4% 18.8%

6.7 -1.8 -2.3 -4.7 .1 -.888 39 8 132 31 8 306

28.8% 12.7% 2.6% 43.1% 10.1% 2.6% 100.0%3.2% 1.4% .3% 4.8% 1.1% .3% 11.2%

-2.8 4.4 -1.5 .2 4.0 -.369 10 6 85 17 5 192

35.9% 5.2% 3.1% 44.3% 8.9% 2.6% 100.0%2.5% .4% .2% 3.1% .6% .2% 7.0%

-.6 -.6 -.9 .4 2.4 -.3


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

collegeAdvisor

Otherfaculty/staff

USU GeneralCatalog

Majorrequirement

sheetsOther

students Other

sourcinf

Total

D 39

Table 26. Major source of academic information -- Crosstabulation by College

211 54 42 288 22 18 63533.2% 8.5% 6.6% 45.4% 3.5% 2.8% 100.0%

7.7% 2.0% 1.5% 10.6% .8% .7% 23.3%-2.2 2.2 2.5 1.1 -1.8 -.1

23 5 1 31 3 3 6634.8% 7.6% 1.5% 47.0% 4.5% 4.5% 100.0%

.8% .2% .0% 1.1% .1% .1% 2.4%-.5 .4 -1.1 .6 -.2 .839 10 14 88 11 6 168

23.2% 6.0% 8.3% 52.4% 6.5% 3.6% 100.0%1.4% .4% .5% 3.2% .4% .2% 6.2%

-3.2 -.2 2.4 2.0 .9 .542 6 2 18 0 6 74

56.8% 8.1% 2.7% 24.3% .0% 8.1% 100.0%1.5% .2% .1% .7% .0% .2% 2.7%

2.5 .6 -.7 -2.4 -1.9 2.61054 173 122 1159 137 80 2725

38.7% 6.3% 4.5% 42.5% 5.0% 2.9% 100.0%38.7% 6.3% 4.5% 42.5% 5.0% 2.9% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

AdvisorOther

faculty/staffUSU General

Catalog

Majorrequirement

sheetsOther

students Other

sourcinf

Total

Table 27. My advisor is friendly toward me -- Crosstabulation by College

99 60 11 3 1 0 17456.9% 34.5% 6.3% 1.7% .6% .0% 100.0%

3.7% 2.2% .4% .1% .0% .0% 6.5%.7 .4 -1.3 -.7 -1.0 -1.2

297 210 66 8 9 3 59350.1% 35.4% 11.1% 1.3% 1.5% .5% 100.0%11.0% 7.8% 2.4% .3% .3% .1% 22.0%

-1.0 1.1 1.5 -1.8 .1 -1.0


Agriculture

Business

college

StronglyAgree Agree Neutral Disagree

StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advfrien

Total

D 40

Table 27. My advisor is friendly toward me -- Crosstabulation by College

298 157 37 7 8 2 50958.5% 30.8% 7.3% 1.4% 1.6% .4% 100.0%11.1% 5.8% 1.4% .3% .3% .1% 18.9%

1.7 -.7 -1.5 -1.7 .2 -1.2115 112 42 18 7 7 301

38.2% 37.2% 14.0% 6.0% 2.3% 2.3% 100.0%4.3% 4.2% 1.6% .7% .3% .3% 11.2%

-3.6 1.4 2.7 3.7 1.3 2.666 71 33 15 3 3 191

34.6% 37.2% 17.3% 7.9% 1.6% 1.6% 100.0%2.4% 2.6% 1.2% .6% .1% .1% 7.1%

-3.5 1.1 3.7 4.6 .1 1.0386 179 40 7 6 6 624

61.9% 28.7% 6.4% 1.1% 1.0% 1.0% 100.0%14.3% 6.6% 1.5% .3% .2% .2% 23.2%

3.0 -1.8 -2.3 -2.2 -1.0 .242 17 2 2 0 0 63

66.7% 27.0% 3.2% 3.2% .0% .0% 100.0%1.6% .6% .1% .1% .0% .0% 2.3%

1.5 -.8 -1.6 .3 -1.0 -.777 57 17 9 5 2 167

46.1% 34.1% 10.2% 5.4% 3.0% 1.2% 100.0%2.9% 2.1% .6% .3% .2% .1% 6.2%

-1.2 .3 .4 2.3 1.7 .452 19 1 0 0 1 73

71.2% 26.0% 1.4% .0% .0% 1.4% 100.0%1.9% .7% .0% .0% .0% .0% 2.7%

2.1 -1.0 -2.2 -1.4 -1.0 .41432 882 249 69 39 24 2695

53.1% 32.7% 9.2% 2.6% 1.4% .9% 100.0%53.1% 32.7% 9.2% 2.6% 1.4% .9% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advfrien

Total

D 41

Table 28. My advisor demonstrates interest in my welfare -- Crosstabulation by College

94 53 17 6 3 1 17454.0% 30.5% 9.8% 3.4% 1.7% .6% 100.0%

3.5% 2.0% .6% .2% .1% .0% 6.5%2.3 -.8 -2.1 -.4 -.2 -.7

214 224 113 27 11 4 59336.1% 37.8% 19.1% 4.6% 1.9% .7% 100.0%

7.9% 8.3% 4.2% 1.0% .4% .1% 22.0%-2.5 1.7 1.8 .5 -.2 -1.1246 163 79 11 10 1 510

48.2% 32.0% 15.5% 2.2% 2.0% .2% 100.0%9.1% 6.1% 2.9% .4% .4% .0% 18.9%

1.9 -.7 -.4 -2.2 .0 -2.091 111 61 20 8 9 300

30.3% 37.0% 20.3% 6.7% 2.7% 3.0% 100.0%3.4% 4.1% 2.3% .7% .3% .3% 11.1%

-3.3 1.0 1.8 2.2 .9 3.047 75 41 15 6 6 190

24.7% 39.5% 21.6% 7.9% 3.2% 3.2% 100.0%1.7% 2.8% 1.5% .6% .2% .2% 7.1%

-3.8 1.3 1.9 2.6 1.2 2.6318 190 86 13 8 8 623

51.0% 30.5% 13.8% 2.1% 1.3% 1.3% 100.0%11.8% 7.1% 3.2% .5% .3% .3% 23.1%

3.1 -1.4 -1.4 -2.5 -1.2 .330 23 6 3 1 0 63

47.6% 36.5% 9.5% 4.8% 1.6% .0% 100.0%1.1% .9% .2% .1% .0% .0% 2.3%

.6 .4 -1.3 .3 -.2 -.966 51 27 16 6 1 167

39.5% 30.5% 16.2% 9.6% 3.6% .6% 100.0%2.5% 1.9% 1.0% .6% .2% .0% 6.2%

-.7 -.7 .0 3.5 1.5 -.7


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advinter

Total

D 42

Table 28. My advisor demonstrates interest in my welfare -- Crosstabulation by College

48 20 4 0 0 1 7365.8% 27.4% 5.5% .0% .0% 1.4% 100.0%

1.8% .7% .1% .0% .0% .0% 2.7%3.0 -.9 -2.3 -1.7 -1.2 .2

1154 910 434 111 53 31 269342.9% 33.8% 16.1% 4.1% 2.0% 1.2% 100.0%42.9% 33.8% 16.1% 4.1% 2.0% 1.2% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advinter

Total

Table 29. My advisor is readily available for consultation -- Crosstabulation by College

77 55 27 12 3 0 17444.3% 31.6% 15.5% 6.9% 1.7% .0% 100.0%

2.9% 2.0% 1.0% .4% .1% .0% 6.5%3.5 -1.3 -1.1 -.7 -1.2 -1.4

170 259 100 41 14 6 59028.8% 43.9% 16.9% 6.9% 2.4% 1.0% 100.0%

6.3% 9.7% 3.7% 1.5% .5% .2% 22.0%-.4 2.4 -1.3 -1.3 -1.4 -.3

157 200 88 40 20 2 50731.0% 39.4% 17.4% 7.9% 3.9% .4% 100.0%

5.9% 7.5% 3.3% 1.5% .7% .1% 18.9%.5 .6 -1.0 -.5 .6 -1.6

41 78 86 55 28 11 29913.7% 26.1% 28.8% 18.4% 9.4% 3.7% 100.0%

1.5% 2.9% 3.2% 2.0% 1.0% .4% 11.1%-5.1 -3.3 3.7 5.9 5.5 4.1

25 88 43 24 8 2 19013.2% 46.3% 22.6% 12.6% 4.2% 1.1% 100.0%

.9% 3.3% 1.6% .9% .3% .1% 7.1%-4.2 1.9 1.0 2.0 .6 -.1


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advavail

Total

D 43

Table 29. My advisor is readily available for consultation -- Crosstabulation by College

223 226 119 34 13 6 62135.9% 36.4% 19.2% 5.5% 2.1% 1.0% 100.0%

8.3% 8.4% 4.4% 1.3% .5% .2% 23.1%2.9 -.6 -.1 -2.6 -1.8 -.423 24 12 4 0 0 63

36.5% 38.1% 19.0% 6.3% .0% .0% 100.0%.9% .9% .4% .1% .0% .0% 2.3%1.0 .0 -.1 -.6 -1.5 -.954 64 31 11 4 2 166

32.5% 38.6% 18.7% 6.6% 2.4% 1.2% 100.0%2.0% 2.4% 1.2% .4% .1% .1% 6.2%

.7 .1 -.2 -.8 -.7 .126 22 13 7 3 2 73

35.6% 30.1% 17.8% 9.6% 4.1% 2.7% 100.0%1.0% .8% .5% .3% .1% .1% 2.7%

.9 -1.1 -.3 .3 .3 1.3796 1016 519 228 93 31 2683

29.7% 37.9% 19.3% 8.5% 3.5% 1.2% 100.0%29.7% 37.9% 19.3% 8.5% 3.5% 1.2% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advavail

Total

Table 30. My advisor is easy to get an appointment with -- Crosstabulation by College

66 61 28 11 4 3 17338.2% 35.3% 16.2% 6.4% 2.3% 1.7% 100.0%

2.5% 2.3% 1.0% .4% .1% .1% 6.5%2.6 -.7 -1.0 -.8 -.9 -.5

157 263 102 39 14 16 59126.6% 44.5% 17.3% 6.6% 2.4% 2.7% 100.0%

5.9% 9.8% 3.8% 1.5% .5% .6% 22.1%-.5 2.4 -1.3 -1.3 -1.7 .6


Agriculture

Business

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advappt

Total

D 44

Table 30. My advisor is easy to get an appointment with -- Crosstabulation by College

154 203 86 32 18 14 50730.4% 40.0% 17.0% 6.3% 3.6% 2.8% 100.0%

5.7% 7.6% 3.2% 1.2% .7% .5% 18.9%1.1 .6 -1.3 -1.5 -.2 .634 70 86 61 34 14 299

11.4% 23.4% 28.8% 20.4% 11.4% 4.7% 100.0%1.3% 2.6% 3.2% 2.3% 1.3% .5% 11.2%

-5.4 -4.2 3.6 7.4 6.9 2.624 83 49 22 8 3 189

12.7% 43.9% 25.9% 11.6% 4.2% 1.6% 100.0%.9% 3.1% 1.8% .8% .3% .1% 7.1%-3.9 1.2 2.0 1.7 .4 -.7214 227 119 37 14 8 619

34.6% 36.7% 19.2% 6.0% 2.3% 1.3% 100.0%8.0% 8.5% 4.4% 1.4% .5% .3% 23.1%

3.2 -.7 -.2 -1.9 -1.9 -1.723 25 13 1 1 0 63

36.5% 39.7% 20.6% 1.6% 1.6% .0% 100.0%.9% .9% .5% .0% .0% .0% 2.4%1.3 .2 .2 -1.8 -.9 -1.253 73 26 9 4 2 167

31.7% 43.7% 15.6% 5.4% 2.4% 1.2% 100.0%2.0% 2.7% 1.0% .3% .1% .1% 6.2%

1.0 1.1 -1.2 -1.3 -.9 -1.018 26 16 7 2 3 72

25.0% 36.1% 22.2% 9.7% 2.8% 4.2% 100.0%.7% 1.0% .6% .3% .1% .1% 2.7%

-.4 -.3 .5 .5 -.4 1.0743 1031 525 219 99 63 2680

27.7% 38.5% 19.6% 8.2% 3.7% 2.4% 100.0%27.7% 38.5% 19.6% 8.2% 3.7% 2.4% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advappt

Total

D 45

Table 31. My advisor doe not make me feel rushed during our meetings -- crosstabultion by Collge

76 60 26 10 2 0 17443.7% 34.5% 14.9% 5.7% 1.1% .0% 100.0%

2.8% 2.2% 1.0% .4% .1% .0% 6.5%1.7 -.6 -.1 -.3 -1.3 -2.0

172 253 95 41 14 17 59229.1% 42.7% 16.0% 6.9% 2.4% 2.9% 100.0%

6.4% 9.4% 3.5% 1.5% .5% .6% 22.0%-2.8 2.1 .4 .6 -.6 1.0220 195 55 20 10 8 508

43.3% 38.4% 10.8% 3.9% 2.0% 1.6% 100.0%8.2% 7.3% 2.0% .7% .4% .3% 18.9%

2.8 .3 -2.6 -2.1 -1.1 -1.058 101 74 32 17 18 300

19.3% 33.7% 24.7% 10.7% 5.7% 6.0% 100.0%2.2% 3.8% 2.8% 1.2% .6% .7% 11.2%

-4.8 -1.1 4.1 3.0 3.0 4.446 72 43 18 7 4 190

24.2% 37.9% 22.6% 9.5% 3.7% 2.1% 100.0%1.7% 2.7% 1.6% .7% .3% .1% 7.1%

-2.7 .1 2.6 1.8 .8 -.1263 217 86 33 13 8 620

42.4% 35.0% 13.9% 5.3% 2.1% 1.3% 100.0%9.8% 8.1% 3.2% 1.2% .5% .3% 23.1%

2.7 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.629 24 8 1 1 0 63

46.0% 38.1% 12.7% 1.6% 1.6% .0% 100.0%1.1% .9% .3% .0% .0% .0% 2.3%

1.3 .1 -.5 -1.5 -.6 -1.255 68 20 12 10 2 167

32.9% 40.7% 12.0% 7.2% 6.0% 1.2% 100.0%2.0% 2.5% .7% .4% .4% .1% 6.2%

-.6 .7 -1.1 .5 2.5 -.9


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advrush

Total

D 46

Table 31. My advisor doe not make me feel rushed during our meetings -- crosstabultion by Collge

45 17 6 2 0 3 7361.6% 23.3% 8.2% 2.7% .0% 4.1% 100.0%

1.7% .6% .2% .1% .0% .1% 2.7%3.7 -2.0 -1.6 -1.2 -1.4 1.1

964 1007 413 169 74 60 268735.9% 37.5% 15.4% 6.3% 2.8% 2.2% 100.0%35.9% 37.5% 15.4% 6.3% 2.8% 2.2% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advrush

Total

Table 32. My advisor is prepared for appointments with appropriate transcripts and degree requirement analyses -- Crosstabulation by College

80 63 20 4 3 1 17146.8% 36.8% 11.7% 2.3% 1.8% .6% 100.0%

3.0% 2.4% .7% .1% .1% .0% 6.4%2.1 .1 -1.5 -1.3 -.4 -2.1

185 239 109 23 13 22 59131.3% 40.4% 18.4% 3.9% 2.2% 3.7% 100.0%

6.9% 8.9% 4.1% .9% .5% .8% 22.1%-2.3 1.6 1.2 -.6 .1 .2220 195 59 12 8 14 508

43.3% 38.4% 11.6% 2.4% 1.6% 2.8% 100.0%8.2% 7.3% 2.2% .4% .3% .5% 19.0%

2.3 .7 -2.7 -2.2 -.9 -.974 112 67 16 6 24 299

24.7% 37.5% 22.4% 5.4% 2.0% 8.0% 100.0%2.8% 4.2% 2.5% .6% .2% .9% 11.2%

-3.5 .3 2.6 .8 -.2 4.173 71 27 10 5 4 190

38.4% 37.4% 14.2% 5.3% 2.6% 2.1% 100.0%2.7% 2.6% 1.0% .4% .2% .1% 7.1%

.3 .2 -.8 .6 .4 -1.1


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advprep

Total

D 47

Table 32. My advisor is prepared for appointments with appropriate transcripts and degree requirement analyses -- Crosstabulation by College

255 201 97 28 16 23 62041.1% 32.4% 15.6% 4.5% 2.6% 3.7% 100.0%

9.5% 7.5% 3.6% 1.0% .6% .9% 23.1%1.6 -1.6 -.5 .2 .7 .220 18 18 5 1 0 62

32.3% 29.0% 29.0% 8.1% 1.6% .0% 100.0%.7% .7% .7% .2% .0% .0% 2.3%

-.6 -1.0 2.5 1.4 -.3 -1.542 58 37 19 6 4 166

25.3% 34.9% 22.3% 11.4% 3.6% 2.4% 100.0%1.6% 2.2% 1.4% .7% .2% .1% 6.2%

-2.5 -.3 1.9 4.4 1.3 -.846 18 6 0 0 3 73

63.0% 24.7% 8.2% .0% .0% 4.1% 100.0%1.7% .7% .2% .0% .0% .1% 2.7%

3.6 -1.7 -1.7 -1.8 -1.3 .3995 975 440 117 58 95 2680

37.1% 36.4% 16.4% 4.4% 2.2% 3.5% 100.0%37.1% 36.4% 16.4% 4.4% 2.2% 3.5% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advprep

Total

Table 33. My advisor communicates his/her advice effectively -- Crosstabulation by College

78 68 16 8 3 0 17345.1% 39.3% 9.2% 4.6% 1.7% .0% 100.0%

2.9% 2.5% .6% .3% .1% .0% 6.4%1.2 -.2 -1.5 .2 .2 -1.6

199 266 79 26 14 8 59233.6% 44.9% 13.3% 4.4% 2.4% 1.4% 100.0%

7.4% 9.9% 2.9% 1.0% .5% .3% 22.1%-2.2 1.9 .1 .0 1.6 -.3


Agriculture

Business

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advcomm

Total

D 48

Table 33. My advisor communicates his/her advice effectively -- Crosstabulation by College

232 195 53 19 5 5 50945.6% 38.3% 10.4% 3.7% 1.0% 1.0% 100.0%

8.6% 7.3% 2.0% .7% .2% .2% 19.0%2.3 -.6 -1.8 -.7 -1.0 -1.073 143 53 10 4 17 300

24.3% 47.7% 17.7% 3.3% 1.3% 5.7% 100.0%2.7% 5.3% 2.0% .4% .1% .6% 11.2%

-4.1 2.1 2.1 -.9 -.3 5.852 75 41 13 6 3 190

27.4% 39.5% 21.6% 6.8% 3.2% 1.6% 100.0%1.9% 2.8% 1.5% .5% .2% .1% 7.1%

-2.6 -.1 3.1 1.6 1.8 .1288 219 73 27 4 6 617

46.7% 35.5% 11.8% 4.4% .6% 1.0% 100.0%10.7% 8.2% 2.7% 1.0% .1% .2% 23.0%

3.0 -1.8 -1.0 .0 -1.8 -1.130 17 10 5 0 0 62

48.4% 27.4% 16.1% 8.1% .0% .0% 100.0%1.1% .6% .4% .2% .0% .0% 2.3%

1.2 -1.6 .6 1.4 -1.0 -1.055 72 26 9 5 1 168

32.7% 42.9% 15.5% 5.4% 3.0% .6% 100.0%2.0% 2.7% 1.0% .3% .2% .0% 6.3%

-1.3 .6 .8 .6 1.5 -1.046 21 5 0 0 1 73

63.0% 28.8% 6.8% .0% .0% 1.4% 100.0%1.7% .8% .2% .0% .0% .0% 2.7%

3.2 -1.5 -1.5 -1.8 -1.1 -.11053 1076 356 117 41 41 2684

39.2% 40.1% 13.3% 4.4% 1.5% 1.5% 100.0%39.2% 40.1% 13.3% 4.4% 1.5% 1.5% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advcomm

Total

D 49

Table 34. My advisor listens well to my concerns -- Crosstabulation by College

74 68 18 7 4 1 17243.0% 39.5% 10.5% 4.1% 2.3% .6% 100.0%

2.8% 2.5% .7% .3% .1% .0% 6.4%1.0 .1 -1.5 .0 .1 -1.2

196 251 106 16 15 8 59233.1% 42.4% 17.9% 2.7% 2.5% 1.4% 100.0%

7.3% 9.4% 4.0% .6% .6% .3% 22.1%-2.0 1.4 1.9 -1.6 .5 -.7235 181 62 19 6 5 508

46.3% 35.6% 12.2% 3.7% 1.2% 1.0% 100.0%8.8% 6.8% 2.3% .7% .2% .2% 18.9%

3.0 -1.2 -1.6 -.3 -1.5 -1.373 120 68 14 9 16 300

24.3% 40.0% 22.7% 4.7% 3.0% 5.3% 100.0%2.7% 4.5% 2.5% .5% .3% .6% 11.2%

-3.9 .3 3.5 .6 .9 4.747 80 34 16 8 4 189

24.9% 42.3% 18.0% 8.5% 4.2% 2.1% 100.0%1.8% 3.0% 1.3% .6% .3% .1% 7.0%

-3.0 .8 1.1 3.0 1.9 .4269 232 77 22 11 8 619

43.5% 37.5% 12.4% 3.6% 1.8% 1.3% 100.0%10.0% 8.7% 2.9% .8% .4% .3% 23.1%

2.1 -.6 -1.6 -.6 -.7 -.931 21 8 1 1 0 62

50.0% 33.9% 12.9% 1.6% 1.6% .0% 100.0%1.2% .8% .3% .0% .0% .0% 2.3%

1.5 -.6 -.4 -.9 -.3 -1.052 71 23 13 5 3 167

31.1% 42.5% 13.8% 7.8% 3.0% 1.8% 100.0%1.9% 2.6% .9% .5% .2% .1% 6.2%

-1.5 .7 -.4 2.4 .7 .0


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advliste

Total

D 50

Table 34. My advisor listens well to my concerns -- Crosstabulation by College

46 19 5 0 0 2 7263.9% 26.4% 6.9% .0% .0% 2.8% 100.0%

1.7% .7% .2% .0% .0% .1% 2.7%3.5 -1.7 -1.8 -1.7 -1.3 .7

1023 1043 401 108 59 47 268138.2% 38.9% 15.0% 4.0% 2.2% 1.8% 100.0%38.2% 38.9% 15.0% 4.0% 2.2% 1.8% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advliste

Total

Table 35. My advisor understands my need for advice -- Crosstabulation by College

71 62 29 6 4 1 17341.0% 35.8% 16.8% 3.5% 2.3% .6% 100.0%

2.7% 2.3% 1.1% .2% .1% .0% 6.5%1.3 -.5 -.4 -.5 .1 -1.4

170 236 131 32 10 9 58828.9% 40.1% 22.3% 5.4% 1.7% 1.5% 100.0%

6.4% 8.8% 4.9% 1.2% .4% .3% 22.0%-2.5 .8 2.4 1.3 -.9 -1.1215 192 67 17 9 8 508

42.3% 37.8% 13.2% 3.3% 1.8% 1.6% 100.0%8.0% 7.2% 2.5% .6% .3% .3% 19.0%

2.8 -.1 -2.6 -1.1 -.7 -1.074 120 67 9 12 17 299

24.7% 40.1% 22.4% 3.0% 4.0% 5.7% 100.0%2.8% 4.5% 2.5% .3% .4% .6% 11.2%

-3.0 .5 1.8 -1.1 2.0 4.141 76 50 9 8 4 188

21.8% 40.4% 26.6% 4.8% 4.3% 2.1% 100.0%1.5% 2.8% 1.9% .3% .3% .1% 7.0%

-3.1 .5 2.8 .3 1.8 -.1


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advunder

Total

D 51

Table 35. My advisor understands my need for advice -- Crosstabulation by College

255 222 92 27 11 12 61941.2% 35.9% 14.9% 4.4% 1.8% 1.9% 100.0%

9.5% 8.3% 3.4% 1.0% .4% .4% 23.1%2.6 -.9 -1.9 .0 -.8 -.425 22 10 1 2 1 61

41.0% 36.1% 16.4% 1.6% 3.3% 1.6% 100.0%.9% .8% .4% .0% .1% .0% 2.3%

.8 -.3 -.3 -1.0 .5 -.344 70 30 14 4 4 166

26.5% 42.2% 18.1% 8.4% 2.4% 2.4% 100.0%1.6% 2.6% 1.1% .5% .1% .1% 6.2%

-1.9 .8 .0 2.5 .1 .241 21 6 1 0 3 72

56.9% 29.2% 8.3% 1.4% .0% 4.2% 100.0%1.5% .8% .2% .0% .0% .1% 2.7%

3.1 -1.2 -1.9 -1.2 -1.3 1.1936 1021 482 116 60 59 2674

35.0% 38.2% 18.0% 4.3% 2.2% 2.2% 100.0%35.0% 38.2% 18.0% 4.3% 2.2% 2.2% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advunder

Total

Table 36. My advisor helps me clarify career and life goals -- Crosstabulation by College

52 47 39 16 5 13 17230.2% 27.3% 22.7% 9.3% 2.9% 7.6% 100.0%

2.0% 1.8% 1.5% .6% .2% .5% 6.5%.6 .0 -1.0 .6 -.7 .7

126 158 179 55 26 41 58521.5% 27.0% 30.6% 9.4% 4.4% 7.0% 100.0%

4.7% 5.9% 6.7% 2.1% 1.0% 1.5% 22.0%-2.8 -.2 1.8 1.3 .7 .7


Agriculture

Business

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advcgoal

Total

D 52

Table 36. My advisor helps me clarify career and life goals -- Crosstabulation by College

175 168 101 29 11 22 50634.6% 33.2% 20.0% 5.7% 2.2% 4.3% 100.0%

6.6% 6.3% 3.8% 1.1% .4% .8% 19.0%2.9 2.4 -2.9 -1.8 -2.0 -1.750 75 100 27 15 31 298

16.8% 25.2% 33.6% 9.1% 5.0% 10.4% 100.0%1.9% 2.8% 3.8% 1.0% .6% 1.2% 11.2%

-3.6 -.8 2.3 .7 1.0 2.936 49 59 23 10 7 184

19.6% 26.6% 32.1% 12.5% 5.4% 3.8% 100.0%1.4% 1.8% 2.2% .9% .4% .3% 6.9%

-2.1 -.2 1.4 2.2 1.0 -1.3204 156 160 40 21 36 617

33.1% 25.3% 25.9% 6.5% 3.4% 5.8% 100.0%7.7% 5.9% 6.0% 1.5% .8% 1.4% 23.2%

2.5 -1.1 -.4 -1.3 -.6 -.422 15 17 4 1 3 62

35.5% 24.2% 27.4% 6.5% 1.6% 4.8% 100.0%.8% .6% .6% .2% .0% .1% 2.3%1.2 -.5 .1 -.4 -.9 -.436 41 47 17 15 9 165

21.8% 24.8% 28.5% 10.3% 9.1% 5.5% 100.0%1.4% 1.5% 1.8% .6% .6% .3% 6.2%

-1.4 -.7 .4 1.1 3.4 -.437 23 8 0 0 4 72

51.4% 31.9% 11.1% .0% .0% 5.6% 100.0%1.4% .9% .3% .0% .0% .2% 2.7%

3.8 .7 -2.6 -2.4 -1.7 -.2738 732 710 211 104 166 2661

27.7% 27.5% 26.7% 7.9% 3.9% 6.2% 100.0%27.7% 27.5% 26.7% 7.9% 3.9% 6.2% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advcgoal

Total

D 53

Table 37. My advisor refers me to resources that help me clarify career and life goals -- Crosstabulation by College

45 57 37 12 7 15 17326.0% 32.9% 21.4% 6.9% 4.0% 8.7% 100.0%

1.7% 2.1% 1.4% .5% .3% .6% 6.5%.1 1.2 -1.4 -.2 -.1 .4

122 170 167 50 28 49 58620.8% 29.0% 28.5% 8.5% 4.8% 8.4% 100.0%

4.6% 6.4% 6.3% 1.9% 1.1% 1.8% 22.0%-2.3 .3 .8 1.0 .6 .4156 154 132 19 12 33 506

30.8% 30.4% 26.1% 3.8% 2.4% 6.5% 100.0%5.9% 5.8% 5.0% .7% .5% 1.2% 19.0%

2.4 .9 -.3 -3.0 -2.0 -1.153 66 93 34 15 35 296

17.9% 22.3% 31.4% 11.5% 5.1% 11.8% 100.0%2.0% 2.5% 3.5% 1.3% .6% 1.3% 11.1%

-2.6 -1.9 1.6 2.6 .7 2.432 51 54 24 15 10 186

17.2% 27.4% 29.0% 12.9% 8.1% 5.4% 100.0%1.2% 1.9% 2.0% .9% .6% .4% 7.0%

-2.2 -.2 .6 2.8 2.5 -1.2186 158 165 36 23 45 613

30.3% 25.8% 26.9% 5.9% 3.8% 7.3% 100.0%7.0% 5.9% 6.2% 1.4% .9% 1.7% 23.1%

2.4 -1.2 .1 -1.4 -.6 -.517 23 10 5 1 6 62

27.4% 37.1% 16.1% 8.1% 1.6% 9.7% 100.0%.6% .9% .4% .2% .0% .2% 2.3%

.3 1.3 -1.6 .2 -1.0 .535 52 42 14 12 11 166

21.1% 31.3% 25.3% 8.4% 7.2% 6.6% 100.0%1.3% 2.0% 1.6% .5% .5% .4% 6.2%

-1.1 .7 -.3 .5 1.9 -.6


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advrgoal

Total

D 54

Table 37. My advisor refers me to resources that help me clarify career and life goals -- Crosstabulation by College

33 20 10 2 0 6 7146.5% 28.2% 14.1% 2.8% .0% 8.5% 100.0%

1.2% .8% .4% .1% .0% .2% 2.7%3.5 .0 -2.1 -1.4 -1.7 .2

679 751 710 196 113 210 265925.5% 28.2% 26.7% 7.4% 4.2% 7.9% 100.0%25.5% 28.2% 26.7% 7.4% 4.2% 7.9% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advrgoal

Total

Table 38. My advisor helps me understand my interests and abilities -- Crosstabulation by College

40 46 47 12 7 21 17323.1% 26.6% 27.2% 6.9% 4.0% 12.1% 100.0%

1.5% 1.7% 1.8% .4% .3% .8% 6.5%.5 .9 -1.2 -.9 .0 1.1

99 121 217 63 27 62 58916.8% 20.5% 36.8% 10.7% 4.6% 10.5% 100.0%

3.7% 4.5% 8.1% 2.4% 1.0% 2.3% 22.0%-2.5 -1.4 2.0 1.3 .6 .7125 121 157 32 16 56 507

24.7% 23.9% 31.0% 6.3% 3.2% 11.0% 100.0%4.7% 4.5% 5.9% 1.2% .6% 2.1% 18.9%

1.5 .2 -.5 -2.1 -1.1 1.041 58 113 31 17 39 299

13.7% 19.4% 37.8% 10.4% 5.7% 13.0% 100.0%1.5% 2.2% 4.2% 1.2% .6% 1.5% 11.2%

-2.9 -1.4 1.7 .7 1.3 1.928 42 60 32 16 11 189

14.8% 22.2% 31.7% 16.9% 8.5% 5.8% 100.0%1.0% 1.6% 2.2% 1.2% .6% .4% 7.1%

-2.0 -.3 -.1 3.6 3.0 -1.7


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advhelps

Total

D 55

Table 38. My advisor helps me understand my interests and abilities -- Crosstabulation by College

176 162 174 49 18 40 61928.4% 26.2% 28.1% 7.9% 2.9% 6.5% 100.0%

6.6% 6.1% 6.5% 1.8% .7% 1.5% 23.1%3.7 1.4 -1.8 -1.0 -1.5 -2.516 19 15 6 1 5 62

25.8% 30.6% 24.2% 9.7% 1.6% 8.1% 100.0%.6% .7% .6% .2% .0% .2% 2.3%

.7 1.2 -1.1 .2 -1.0 -.426 34 63 18 8 17 166

15.7% 20.5% 38.0% 10.8% 4.8% 10.2% 100.0%1.0% 1.3% 2.4% .7% .3% .6% 6.2%

-1.6 -.8 1.3 .8 .5 .225 24 16 0 0 7 72

34.7% 33.3% 22.2% .0% .0% 9.7% 100.0%.9% .9% .6% .0% .0% .3% 2.7%2.4 1.7 -1.5 -2.6 -1.7 .0

576 627 862 243 110 258 267621.5% 23.4% 32.2% 9.1% 4.1% 9.6% 100.0%21.5% 23.4% 32.2% 9.1% 4.1% 9.6% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advhelps

Total

Table 39. My advisor helps me evaulate my interests and abilities -- Crosstabulation by College

38 43 45 19 7 20 17222.1% 25.0% 26.2% 11.0% 4.1% 11.6% 100.0%

1.4% 1.6% 1.7% .7% .3% .7% 6.4%.4 .5 -1.3 .5 .1 .6

92 122 207 76 26 65 58815.6% 20.7% 35.2% 12.9% 4.4% 11.1% 100.0%

3.4% 4.6% 7.8% 2.8% 1.0% 2.4% 22.0%-2.8 -1.3 1.5 2.3 .5 .7


Agriculture

Business

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

adveval

Total

D 56

Table 39. My advisor helps me evaulate my interests and abilities -- Crosstabulation by College

123 128 148 38 16 54 50724.3% 25.2% 29.2% 7.5% 3.2% 10.7% 100.0%

4.6% 4.8% 5.5% 1.4% .6% 2.0% 19.0%1.7 .9 -1.0 -1.8 -.9 .435 64 113 35 13 39 299

11.7% 21.4% 37.8% 11.7% 4.3% 13.0% 100.0%1.3% 2.4% 4.2% 1.3% .5% 1.5% 11.2%

-3.5 -.7 1.9 1.0 .3 1.628 36 66 32 15 11 188

14.9% 19.1% 35.1% 17.0% 8.0% 5.9% 100.0%1.0% 1.3% 2.5% 1.2% .6% .4% 7.0%

-1.8 -1.2 .8 3.1 2.8 -1.9168 166 178 43 19 44 618

27.2% 26.9% 28.8% 7.0% 3.1% 7.1% 100.0%6.3% 6.2% 6.7% 1.6% .7% 1.6% 23.1%

3.4 1.8 -1.3 -2.4 -1.1 -2.417 16 14 7 1 6 61

27.9% 26.2% 23.0% 11.5% 1.6% 9.8% 100.0%.6% .6% .5% .3% .0% .2% 2.3%1.2 .5 -1.2 .4 -.9 -.129 26 62 16 9 23 165

17.6% 15.8% 37.6% 9.7% 5.5% 13.9% 100.0%1.1% 1.0% 2.3% .6% .3% .9% 6.2%

-.9 -2.0 1.3 -.1 1.0 1.527 22 14 0 0 9 72

37.5% 30.6% 19.4% .0% .0% 12.5% 100.0%1.0% .8% .5% .0% .0% .3% 2.7%

3.1 1.3 -1.8 -2.7 -1.7 .6557 623 847 266 106 271 2670

20.9% 23.3% 31.7% 10.0% 4.0% 10.1% 100.0%20.9% 23.3% 31.7% 10.0% 4.0% 10.1% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

adveval

Total

D 57

Table 40. My advisor keeps my interests and abilities in mind when helping me choose courses/programs -- Crosstabulation by College

47 59 37 11 6 12 17227.3% 34.3% 21.5% 6.4% 3.5% 7.0% 100.0%

1.8% 2.2% 1.4% .4% .2% .5% 6.5%.5 1.8 -1.5 -.5 -.4 -.7

114 142 200 54 26 50 58619.5% 24.2% 34.1% 9.2% 4.4% 8.5% 100.0%

4.3% 5.3% 7.5% 2.0% 1.0% 1.9% 22.0%-2.9 -1.3 3.1 1.6 .5 .1140 163 116 29 15 43 506

27.7% 32.2% 22.9% 5.7% 3.0% 8.5% 100.0%5.3% 6.1% 4.4% 1.1% .6% 1.6% 19.0%

1.0 2.2 -2.0 -1.4 -1.2 .052 71 104 20 19 33 299

17.4% 23.7% 34.8% 6.7% 6.4% 11.0% 100.0%2.0% 2.7% 3.9% .8% .7% 1.2% 11.2%

-2.8 -1.1 2.4 -.5 2.0 1.535 44 55 24 16 12 186

18.8% 23.7% 29.6% 12.9% 8.6% 6.5% 100.0%1.3% 1.7% 2.1% .9% .6% .5% 7.0%

-1.8 -.9 .5 2.8 3.1 -.9204 160 153 29 17 48 611

33.4% 26.2% 25.0% 4.7% 2.8% 7.9% 100.0%7.7% 6.0% 5.8% 1.1% .6% 1.8% 23.0%

3.9 -.4 -1.2 -2.4 -1.6 -.518 21 14 5 1 3 62

29.0% 33.9% 22.6% 8.1% 1.6% 4.8% 100.0%.7% .8% .5% .2% .0% .1% 2.3%

.6 1.0 -.7 .2 -1.0 -1.034 41 43 24 8 16 166

20.5% 24.7% 25.9% 14.5% 4.8% 9.6% 100.0%1.3% 1.5% 1.6% .9% .3% .6% 6.2%

-1.3 -.6 -.4 3.3 .5 .5


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advchoos

Total

D 58

Table 40. My advisor keeps my interests and abilities in mind when helping me choose courses/programs -- Crosstabulation by College

34 20 9 1 0 8 7247.2% 27.8% 12.5% 1.4% .0% 11.1% 100.0%

1.3% .8% .3% .0% .0% .3% 2.7%3.7 .1 -2.4 -1.9 -1.7 .8

678 721 731 197 108 225 266025.5% 27.1% 27.5% 7.4% 4.1% 8.5% 100.0%25.5% 27.1% 27.5% 7.4% 4.1% 8.5% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advchoos

Total

Table 41. My advisor helps me develop my decision making skills -- Crosstabulation by College

39 49 46 16 4 18 17222.7% 28.5% 26.7% 9.3% 2.3% 10.5% 100.0%

1.5% 1.8% 1.7% .6% .1% .7% 6.4%.7 1.0 -1.3 .4 -.6 -.3

92 129 219 56 24 68 58815.6% 21.9% 37.2% 9.5% 4.1% 11.6% 100.0%

3.4% 4.8% 8.2% 2.1% .9% 2.5% 22.0%-2.5 -1.3 2.2 .9 1.3 .2109 140 151 38 9 60 507

21.5% 27.6% 29.8% 7.5% 1.8% 11.8% 100.0%4.1% 5.2% 5.7% 1.4% .3% 2.2% 19.0%

.6 1.4 -1.0 -.8 -1.7 .440 72 107 31 9 41 300

13.3% 24.0% 35.7% 10.3% 3.0% 13.7% 100.0%1.5% 2.7% 4.0% 1.2% .3% 1.5% 11.2%

-2.7 -.2 1.1 1.1 -.1 1.225 52 61 21 10 18 187

13.4% 27.8% 32.6% 11.2% 5.3% 9.6% 100.0%.9% 1.9% 2.3% .8% .4% .7% 7.0%-2.1 .9 .1 1.3 1.7 -.7


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advdecis

Total

D 59

Table 41. My advisor helps me develop my decision making skills -- Crosstabulation by College

167 142 191 40 19 58 61727.1% 23.0% 31.0% 6.5% 3.1% 9.4% 100.0%

6.3% 5.3% 7.2% 1.5% .7% 2.2% 23.1%3.8 -.8 -.5 -1.7 .0 -1.412 22 14 7 1 6 62

19.4% 35.5% 22.6% 11.3% 1.6% 9.7% 100.0%.4% .8% .5% .3% .0% .2% 2.3%

-.2 1.7 -1.3 .8 -.7 -.431 32 53 18 7 25 166

18.7% 19.3% 31.9% 10.8% 4.2% 15.1% 100.0%1.2% 1.2% 2.0% .7% .3% .9% 6.2%

-.5 -1.4 -.1 1.0 .8 1.426 20 18 0 0 8 72

36.1% 27.8% 25.0% .0% .0% 11.1% 100.0%1.0% .7% .7% .0% .0% .3% 2.7%

3.0 .5 -1.1 -2.5 -1.5 .0541 658 860 227 83 302 2671

20.3% 24.6% 32.2% 8.5% 3.1% 11.3% 100.0%20.3% 24.6% 32.2% 8.5% 3.1% 11.3% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advdecis

Total

Table 42. My advisor helps me me with realistic self-appraisal -- Crosstabulation by College

42 49 45 12 4 21 17324.3% 28.3% 26.0% 6.9% 2.3% 12.1% 100.0%

1.6% 1.8% 1.7% .4% .1% .8% 6.5%1.1 .8 -1.4 -.3 -.4 .096 124 216 62 18 72 588

16.3% 21.1% 36.7% 10.5% 3.1% 12.2% 100.0%3.6% 4.6% 8.1% 2.3% .7% 2.7% 22.0%

-2.2 -2.0 2.1 2.7 .4 .1


Agriculture

Business

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advselfa

Total

D 60

Table 42. My advisor helps me me with realistic self-appraisal -- Crosstabulation by College

112 142 152 24 9 67 50622.1% 28.1% 30.0% 4.7% 1.8% 13.2% 100.0%

4.2% 5.3% 5.7% .9% .3% 2.5% 18.9%.9 1.2 -.7 -2.3 -1.4 .7

42 63 111 29 13 40 29814.1% 21.1% 37.2% 9.7% 4.4% 13.4% 100.0%

1.6% 2.4% 4.2% 1.1% .5% 1.5% 11.2%-2.4 -1.4 1.6 1.4 1.6 .6

25 46 68 26 5 19 18913.2% 24.3% 36.0% 13.8% 2.6% 10.1% 100.0%

.9% 1.7% 2.5% 1.0% .2% .7% 7.1%-2.2 -.3 1.0 3.1 -.1 -.8162 178 168 32 17 61 618

26.2% 28.8% 27.2% 5.2% 2.8% 9.9% 100.0%6.1% 6.7% 6.3% 1.2% .6% 2.3% 23.1%

3.2 1.7 -2.1 -2.1 -.1 -1.612 21 18 2 2 7 62

19.4% 33.9% 29.0% 3.2% 3.2% 11.3% 100.0%.4% .8% .7% .1% .1% .3% 2.3%

-.2 1.3 -.4 -1.2 .2 -.227 32 58 13 7 28 165

16.4% 19.4% 35.2% 7.9% 4.2% 17.0% 100.0%1.0% 1.2% 2.2% .5% .3% 1.0% 6.2%

-1.1 -1.5 .7 .2 1.1 1.827 20 16 0 0 9 72

37.5% 27.8% 22.2% .0% .0% 12.5% 100.0%1.0% .7% .6% .0% .0% .3% 2.7%

3.2 .4 -1.5 -2.3 -1.4 .1545 675 852 200 75 324 2671

20.4% 25.3% 31.9% 7.5% 2.8% 12.1% 100.0%20.4% 25.3% 31.9% 7.5% 2.8% 12.1% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advselfa

Total

D 61

Table 43. My advisor helps me develop suitable educational goals/plans -- Crosstabulation by College

57 73 21 10 5 6 17233.1% 42.4% 12.2% 5.8% 2.9% 3.5% 100.0%

2.1% 2.7% .8% .4% .2% .2% 6.5%1.3 1.5 -2.8 .2 .2 -1.4

127 198 162 41 17 41 58621.7% 33.8% 27.6% 7.0% 2.9% 7.0% 100.0%

4.8% 7.4% 6.1% 1.5% .6% 1.5% 22.0%-2.8 -.8 2.9 1.5 .4 .8174 199 88 16 9 20 506

34.4% 39.3% 17.4% 3.2% 1.8% 4.0% 100.0%6.5% 7.5% 3.3% .6% .3% .8% 19.0%

2.8 1.3 -2.3 -2.3 -1.2 -2.058 105 81 18 6 29 297

19.5% 35.4% 27.3% 6.1% 2.0% 9.8% 100.0%2.2% 3.9% 3.0% .7% .2% 1.1% 11.2%

-2.7 -.1 1.9 .4 -.6 2.534 75 46 21 5 7 188

18.1% 39.9% 24.5% 11.2% 2.7% 3.7% 100.0%1.3% 2.8% 1.7% .8% .2% .3% 7.1%

-2.5 .9 .7 3.3 .0 -1.3200 205 130 21 17 40 613

32.6% 33.4% 21.2% 3.4% 2.8% 6.5% 100.0%7.5% 7.7% 4.9% .8% .6% 1.5% 23.0%

2.3 -1.0 -.5 -2.2 .2 .417 27 8 4 2 4 62

27.4% 43.5% 12.9% 6.5% 3.2% 6.5% 100.0%.6% 1.0% .3% .2% .1% .2% 2.3%

-.1 1.0 -1.5 .3 .3 .134 49 45 16 9 12 165

20.6% 29.7% 27.3% 9.7% 5.5% 7.3% 100.0%1.3% 1.8% 1.7% .6% .3% .5% 6.2%

-1.7 -1.3 1.4 2.3 2.2 .6


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advdevg

Total

D 62

Table 43. My advisor helps me develop suitable educational goals/plans -- Crosstabulation by College

38 22 7 0 0 5 7252.8% 30.6% 9.7% .0% .0% 6.9% 100.0%

1.4% .8% .3% .0% .0% .2% 2.7%4.0 -.7 -2.2 -2.0 -1.4 .3

739 953 588 147 70 164 266127.8% 35.8% 22.1% 5.5% 2.6% 6.2% 100.0%27.8% 35.8% 22.1% 5.5% 2.6% 6.2% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advdevg

Total

Table 44. My advisor helps me evaulate my progress toward my established educational goals/plans -- Crosstabulation by College

61 75 22 7 3 4 17235.5% 43.6% 12.8% 4.1% 1.7% 2.3% 100.0%

2.3% 2.8% .8% .3% .1% .2% 6.5%1.1 1.4 -2.2 -.4 -.3 -1.6

151 214 150 23 15 31 58425.9% 36.6% 25.7% 3.9% 2.6% 5.3% 100.0%

5.7% 8.0% 5.6% .9% .6% 1.2% 21.9%-2.1 -.1 2.8 -.9 .9 .2186 200 74 18 9 20 507

36.7% 39.4% 14.6% 3.6% 1.8% 3.9% 100.0%7.0% 7.5% 2.8% .7% .3% .8% 19.0%

2.4 .9 -2.9 -1.2 -.5 -1.265 107 76 18 5 25 296

22.0% 36.1% 25.7% 6.1% 1.7% 8.4% 100.0%2.4% 4.0% 2.9% .7% .2% .9% 11.1%

-2.7 -.2 2.0 1.1 -.4 2.538 72 49 18 4 7 188

20.2% 38.3% 26.1% 9.6% 2.1% 3.7% 100.0%1.4% 2.7% 1.8% .7% .2% .3% 7.1%

-2.6 .3 1.7 3.1 .1 -.8


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advevalp

Total

D 63

Table 44. My advisor helps me evaulate my progress toward my established educational goals/plans -- Crosstabulation by College

218 210 121 22 14 34 61935.2% 33.9% 19.5% 3.6% 2.3% 5.5% 100.0%

8.2% 7.9% 4.5% .8% .5% 1.3% 23.2%2.0 -1.3 -.5 -1.3 .3 .418 29 9 2 2 2 62

29.0% 46.8% 14.5% 3.2% 3.2% 3.2% 100.0%.7% 1.1% .3% .1% .1% .1% 2.3%

-.2 1.3 -1.0 -.5 .6 -.738 62 36 18 3 9 166

22.9% 37.3% 21.7% 10.8% 1.8% 5.4% 100.0%1.4% 2.3% 1.4% .7% .1% .3% 6.2%

-1.8 .1 .4 3.6 -.2 .243 17 8 0 0 4 72

59.7% 23.6% 11.1% .0% .0% 5.6% 100.0%1.6% .6% .3% .0% .0% .2% 2.7%

4.4 -1.9 -1.8 -1.8 -1.2 .2818 986 545 126 55 136 2666

30.7% 37.0% 20.4% 4.7% 2.1% 5.1% 100.0%30.7% 37.0% 20.4% 4.7% 2.1% 5.1% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advevalp

Total

Table 45. My advisor helps me make academic/career decisions -- Crosstabulation by College

51 70 24 13 5 10 17329.5% 40.5% 13.9% 7.5% 2.9% 5.8% 100.0%

1.9% 2.6% .9% .5% .2% .4% 6.5%.5 1.2 -2.5 1.0 .6 -.4

127 210 162 38 15 36 58821.6% 35.7% 27.6% 6.5% 2.6% 6.1% 100.0%

4.8% 7.9% 6.1% 1.4% .6% 1.3% 22.0%-2.8 .3 2.4 .7 .6 -.4


Agriculture

Business

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advacad

Total

D 64

Table 45. My advisor helps me make academic/career decisions -- Crosstabulation by College

174 183 95 21 7 28 50834.3% 36.0% 18.7% 4.1% 1.4% 5.5% 100.0%

6.5% 6.9% 3.6% .8% .3% 1.0% 19.0%2.8 .4 -1.9 -1.5 -1.3 -.960 94 92 15 7 29 297

20.2% 31.6% 31.0% 5.1% 2.4% 9.8% 100.0%2.2% 3.5% 3.4% .6% .3% 1.1% 11.1%

-2.4 -1.0 3.0 -.5 .2 2.237 71 51 17 4 9 189

19.6% 37.6% 27.0% 9.0% 2.1% 4.8% 100.0%1.4% 2.7% 1.9% .6% .1% .3% 7.1%

-2.1 .6 1.2 1.9 -.1 -.9194 212 134 28 12 37 617

31.4% 34.4% 21.7% 4.5% 1.9% 6.0% 100.0%7.3% 7.9% 5.0% 1.0% .4% 1.4% 23.1%

1.8 -.3 -.5 -1.2 -.4 -.517 26 8 5 1 4 61

27.9% 42.6% 13.1% 8.2% 1.6% 6.6% 100.0%.6% 1.0% .3% .2% .0% .1% 2.3%

.0 1.0 -1.6 .8 -.3 .040 50 35 16 8 16 165

24.2% 30.3% 21.2% 9.7% 4.8% 9.7% 100.0%1.5% 1.9% 1.3% .6% .3% .6% 6.2%

-.8 -1.0 -.4 2.1 2.3 1.639 21 7 0 0 5 72

54.2% 29.2% 9.7% .0% .0% 6.9% 100.0%1.5% .8% .3% .0% .0% .2% 2.7%

4.3 -.8 -2.3 -2.0 -1.3 .1739 937 608 153 59 174 2670

27.7% 35.1% 22.8% 5.7% 2.2% 6.5% 100.0%27.7% 35.1% 22.8% 5.7% 2.2% 6.5% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advacad

Total

D 65

Table 46. My advisor helps me to successfully manage my time -- Crosstabulation by College

35 43 48 11 6 27 17020.6% 25.3% 28.2% 6.5% 3.5% 15.9% 100.0%

1.3% 1.6% 1.8% .4% .2% 1.0% 6.4%.5 1.3 -1.0 -1.2 .6 .0

98 115 201 62 16 93 58516.8% 19.7% 34.4% 10.6% 2.7% 15.9% 100.0%

3.7% 4.3% 7.6% 2.3% .6% 3.5% 22.0%-1.2 -.5 .7 1.0 .0 .1102 120 144 37 13 86 502

20.3% 23.9% 28.7% 7.4% 2.6% 17.1% 100.0%3.8% 4.5% 5.4% 1.4% .5% 3.2% 18.9%

.8 1.6 -1.5 -1.5 -.2 .837 52 120 31 7 49 296

12.5% 17.6% 40.5% 10.5% 2.4% 16.6% 100.0%1.4% 2.0% 4.5% 1.2% .3% 1.8% 11.2%

-2.5 -1.2 2.4 .6 -.4 .324 29 71 30 8 27 189

12.7% 15.3% 37.6% 15.9% 4.2% 14.3% 100.0%.9% 1.1% 2.7% 1.1% .3% 1.0% 7.1%-1.9 -1.6 1.2 2.9 1.2 -.5140 123 195 50 15 89 612

22.9% 20.1% 31.9% 8.2% 2.5% 14.5% 100.0%5.3% 4.6% 7.3% 1.9% .6% 3.4% 23.1%

2.3 -.3 -.3 -1.0 -.4 -.810 18 17 7 2 8 62

16.1% 29.0% 27.4% 11.3% 3.2% 12.9% 100.0%.4% .7% .6% .3% .1% .3% 2.3%

-.5 1.5 -.7 .5 .2 -.627 28 53 19 6 33 166

16.3% 16.9% 31.9% 11.4% 3.6% 19.9% 100.0%1.0% 1.1% 2.0% .7% .2% 1.2% 6.3%

-.8 -1.1 -.1 .9 .7 1.3


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advmgtim

Total

D 66

Table 46. My advisor helps me to successfully manage my time -- Crosstabulation by College

27 20 16 2 0 7 7237.5% 27.8% 22.2% 2.8% .0% 9.7% 100.0%

1.0% .8% .6% .1% .0% .3% 2.7%3.6 1.3 -1.5 -1.8 -1.4 -1.3

500 548 865 249 73 419 265418.8% 20.6% 32.6% 9.4% 2.8% 15.8% 100.0%18.8% 20.6% 32.6% 9.4% 2.8% 15.8% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advmgtim

Total

Table 47. My advisor helps me overcome educational problems and skill deficiencies -- Crosstabulation by College

40 48 38 12 5 28 17123.4% 28.1% 22.2% 7.0% 2.9% 16.4% 100.0%

1.5% 1.8% 1.4% .5% .2% 1.1% 6.4%1.0 2.0 -1.8 -.5 -.2 -.599 118 199 53 21 96 586

16.9% 20.1% 34.0% 9.0% 3.6% 16.4% 100.0%3.7% 4.4% 7.5% 2.0% .8% 3.6% 22.1%

-1.7 -.5 1.9 .8 .6 -.9121 119 132 29 11 95 507

23.9% 23.5% 26.0% 5.7% 2.2% 18.7% 100.0%4.6% 4.5% 5.0% 1.1% .4% 3.6% 19.1%

1.9 1.2 -1.5 -1.9 -1.3 .536 57 100 30 18 55 296

12.2% 19.3% 33.8% 10.1% 6.1% 18.6% 100.0%1.4% 2.1% 3.8% 1.1% .7% 2.1% 11.1%

-3.0 -.7 1.3 1.2 2.8 .322 30 63 26 6 38 185

11.9% 16.2% 34.1% 14.1% 3.2% 20.5% 100.0%.8% 1.1% 2.4% 1.0% .2% 1.4% 7.0%-2.5 -1.5 1.1 2.8 .1 .9


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advedprob

Total

D 67

Table 47. My advisor helps me overcome educational problems and skill deficiencies -- Crosstabulation by College

153 124 176 44 13 101 61125.0% 20.3% 28.8% 7.2% 2.1% 16.5% 100.0%

5.8% 4.7% 6.6% 1.7% .5% 3.8% 23.0%2.8 -.4 -.4 -.8 -1.4 -.810 18 17 4 2 11 62

16.1% 29.0% 27.4% 6.5% 3.2% 17.7% 100.0%.4% .7% .6% .2% .1% .4% 2.3%

-.7 1.4 -.3 -.5 .0 .024 33 45 17 8 39 166

14.5% 19.9% 27.1% 10.2% 4.8% 23.5% 100.0%.9% 1.2% 1.7% .6% .3% 1.5% 6.3%-1.6 -.3 -.6 1.0 1.2 1.7

27 14 19 0 0 12 7237.5% 19.4% 26.4% .0% .0% 16.7% 100.0%

1.0% .5% .7% .0% .0% .5% 2.7%3.3 -.3 -.5 -2.4 -1.5 -.2

532 561 789 215 84 475 265620.0% 21.1% 29.7% 8.1% 3.2% 17.9% 100.0%20.0% 21.1% 29.7% 8.1% 3.2% 17.9% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

advedprob

Total

Tabel 48. My advisor refers me to resources that can help me overcome educational problems and skills deficiencies -- Crosstabulation by College

35 48 43 11 6 30 17320.2% 27.7% 24.9% 6.4% 3.5% 17.3% 100.0%

1.3% 1.8% 1.6% .4% .2% 1.1% 6.5%.2 1.9 -1.1 -.4 .4 -.8

100 114 196 54 19 104 58717.0% 19.4% 33.4% 9.2% 3.2% 17.7% 100.0%

3.8% 4.3% 7.4% 2.0% .7% 3.9% 22.1%-1.3 -.9 1.8 1.9 .5 -1.3


Agriculture

Business

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

adveprob

Total

D 68

Tabel 48. My advisor refers me to resources that can help me overcome educational problems and skills deficiencies -- Crosstabulation by College

103 110 142 23 8 120 50620.4% 21.7% 28.1% 4.5% 1.6% 23.7% 100.0%

3.9% 4.1% 5.3% .9% .3% 4.5% 19.0%.5 .3 -.5 -2.2 -1.7 1.8

41 57 101 24 14 58 29513.9% 19.3% 34.2% 8.1% 4.7% 19.7% 100.0%

1.5% 2.1% 3.8% .9% .5% 2.2% 11.1%-2.2 -.7 1.6 .6 1.9 -.2

24 33 58 24 5 44 18812.8% 17.6% 30.9% 12.8% 2.7% 23.4% 100.0%

.9% 1.2% 2.2% .9% .2% 1.7% 7.1%-2.1 -1.1 .4 2.9 -.2 1.0155 137 157 36 17 112 614

25.2% 22.3% 25.6% 5.9% 2.8% 18.2% 100.0%5.8% 5.1% 5.9% 1.4% .6% 4.2% 23.1%

3.2 .7 -1.7 -1.2 -.2 -1.011 16 18 4 1 12 62

17.7% 25.8% 29.0% 6.5% 1.6% 19.4% 100.0%.4% .6% .7% .2% .0% .5% 2.3%

-.3 .8 .0 -.2 -.6 -.121 31 49 14 7 43 165

12.7% 18.8% 29.7% 8.5% 4.2% 26.1% 100.0%.8% 1.2% 1.8% .5% .3% 1.6% 6.2%-2.0 -.6 .1 .6 1.0 1.7

28 15 17 0 0 12 7238.9% 20.8% 23.6% .0% .0% 16.7% 100.0%

1.1% .6% .6% .0% .0% .5% 2.7%3.7 .0 -.9 -2.3 -1.4 -.6

518 561 781 190 77 535 266219.5% 21.1% 29.3% 7.1% 2.9% 20.1% 100.0%19.5% 21.1% 29.3% 7.1% 2.9% 20.1% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

adveprob

Total

D 69

Table 49. My advisor refers me to resources pertinent to my educational goals (internship, study abroad, honors program, and learningassitance programs) -- Crosstabulation by College

15 4 15 32 44 63 1738.7% 2.3% 8.7% 18.5% 25.4% 36.4% 100.0%

.6% .2% .6% 1.2% 1.7% 2.4% 6.5%-.7 -1.3 -.5 -1.5 .0 2.873 32 63 158 145 116 587

12.4% 5.5% 10.7% 26.9% 24.7% 19.8% 100.0%2.7% 1.2% 2.4% 5.9% 5.4% 4.4% 22.0%

1.5 1.3 .7 1.3 -.4 -2.850 18 52 114 135 135 504

9.9% 3.6% 10.3% 22.6% 26.8% 26.8% 100.0%1.9% .7% 2.0% 4.3% 5.1% 5.1% 18.9%

-.4 -.8 .3 -.7 .6 .540 12 40 93 60 53 298

13.4% 4.0% 13.4% 31.2% 20.1% 17.8% 100.0%1.5% .5% 1.5% 3.5% 2.3% 2.0% 11.2%

1.6 -.2 2.0 2.4 -1.8 -2.717 9 23 43 58 37 187

9.1% 4.8% 12.3% 23.0% 31.0% 19.8% 100.0%.6% .3% .9% 1.6% 2.2% 1.4% 7.0%

-.6 .3 1.1 -.4 1.5 -1.648 25 42 139 167 196 617

7.8% 4.1% 6.8% 22.5% 27.1% 31.8% 100.0%1.8% .9% 1.6% 5.2% 6.3% 7.4% 23.2%

-2.1 -.3 -2.4 -.9 .8 3.03 2 8 13 18 18 62

4.8% 3.2% 12.9% 21.0% 29.0% 29.0% 100.0%.1% .1% .3% .5% .7% .7% 2.3%-1.4 -.4 .8 -.5 .6 .5

22 13 19 40 37 33 16413.4% 7.9% 11.6% 24.4% 22.6% 20.1% 100.0%

.8% .5% .7% 1.5% 1.4% 1.2% 6.2%1.2 2.2 .7 .0 -.7 -1.4


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

college

NotApplicable

StronglyDisagree Disagree Neutral Agree

StronglyAgree

advresou

Total

D 70

Table 49. My advisor refers me to resources pertinent to my educational goals (internship, study abroad, honors program, and learningassitance programs) -- Crosstabulation by College

11 0 0 14 14 32 7115.5% .0% .0% 19.7% 19.7% 45.1% 100.0%

.4% .0% .0% .5% .5% 1.2% 2.7%1.3 -1.8 -2.6 -.8 -1.0 3.2

279 115 262 646 678 683 266310.5% 4.3% 9.8% 24.3% 25.5% 25.6% 100.0%10.5% 4.3% 9.8% 24.3% 25.5% 25.6% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advresou

Total

Table 50. My advisor encourages me to participate in experiences whic lead to my intellectual growth -- Crosstabulation by College

21 3 16 18 54 61 17312.1% 1.7% 9.2% 10.4% 31.2% 35.3% 100.0%

.8% .1% .6% .7% 2.0% 2.3% 6.5%.9 -1.2 .1 -4.1 1.4 2.7

68 32 60 178 132 116 58611.6% 5.5% 10.2% 30.4% 22.5% 19.8% 100.0%

2.6% 1.2% 2.3% 6.7% 5.0% 4.4% 22.0%1.2 2.6 1.0 1.8 -1.6 -2.546 13 42 138 146 121 506

9.1% 2.6% 8.3% 27.3% 28.9% 23.9% 100.0%1.7% .5% 1.6% 5.2% 5.5% 4.5% 19.0%

-.7 -1.1 -.6 .3 1.3 -.542 10 31 103 64 47 297

14.1% 3.4% 10.4% 34.7% 21.5% 15.8% 100.0%1.6% .4% 1.2% 3.9% 2.4% 1.8% 11.1%

2.2 -.1 .8 2.7 -1.4 -3.214 10 25 59 53 27 188

7.4% 5.3% 13.3% 31.4% 28.2% 14.4% 100.0%.5% .4% .9% 2.2% 2.0% 1.0% 7.1%-1.1 1.4 1.9 1.3 .6 -2.9


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

college

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advintelg

Total

D 71

Table 50. My advisor encourages me to participate in experiences whic lead to my intellectual growth -- Crosstabulation by College

47 13 49 136 164 209 6187.6% 2.1% 7.9% 22.0% 26.5% 33.8% 100.0%1.8% .5% 1.8% 5.1% 6.2% 7.8% 23.2%

-1.9 -1.8 -.9 -2.2 .4 4.44 2 5 15 17 19 62

6.5% 3.2% 8.1% 24.2% 27.4% 30.6% 100.0%.2% .1% .2% .6% .6% .7% 2.3%

-.9 -.1 -.3 -.4 .2 .919 9 13 48 35 40 164

11.6% 5.5% 7.9% 29.3% 21.3% 24.4% 100.0%.7% .3% .5% 1.8% 1.3% 1.5% 6.2%

.6 1.4 -.5 .7 -1.1 -.27 0 0 14 23 27 71

9.9% .0% .0% 19.7% 32.4% 38.0% 100.0%.3% .0% .0% .5% .9% 1.0% 2.7%

-.1 -1.6 -2.5 -1.1 1.1 2.2268 92 241 709 688 667 2665

10.1% 3.5% 9.0% 26.6% 25.8% 25.0% 100.0%10.1% 3.5% 9.0% 26.6% 25.8% 25.0% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advintelg

Total

Table 51. My advisor helps me select appropriate courses and other educational experiences -- Crosstabulation by College

5 6 5 12 69 76 1732.9% 3.5% 2.9% 6.9% 39.9% 43.9% 100.0%

.2% .2% .2% .5% 2.6% 2.9% 6.5%-1.5 .7 -1.0 -3.1 .7 2.2

27 27 29 122 212 169 5864.6% 4.6% 4.9% 20.8% 36.2% 28.8% 100.0%1.0% 1.0% 1.1% 4.6% 8.0% 6.4% 22.0%

-1.1 3.0 .5 2.4 -.1 -2.1


Agriculture

Business

college

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advscour

Total

D 72

Table 51. My advisor helps me select appropriate courses and other educational experiences -- Crosstabulation by College

23 5 19 70 191 193 5014.6% 1.0% 3.8% 14.0% 38.1% 38.5% 100.0%

.9% .2% .7% 2.6% 7.2% 7.3% 18.8%-1.0 -2.2 -.8 -1.5 .6 1.7

33 9 16 67 106 66 29711.1% 3.0% 5.4% 22.6% 35.7% 22.2% 100.0%

1.2% .3% .6% 2.5% 4.0% 2.5% 11.2%4.0 .5 .7 2.5 -.2 -3.5

6 5 12 30 87 48 1883.2% 2.7% 6.4% 16.0% 46.3% 25.5% 100.0%

.2% .2% .5% 1.1% 3.3% 1.8% 7.1%-1.4 .1 1.2 -.2 2.2 -2.0

39 9 27 106 199 236 6166.3% 1.5% 4.4% 17.2% 32.3% 38.3% 100.0%1.5% .3% 1.0% 4.0% 7.5% 8.9% 23.2%

.7 -1.7 -.2 .3 -1.7 1.81 0 2 11 22 25 61

1.6% .0% 3.3% 18.0% 36.1% 41.0% 100.0%.0% .0% .1% .4% .8% .9% 2.3%-1.3 -1.3 -.5 .3 -.1 .9

11 8 11 21 63 51 1656.7% 4.8% 6.7% 12.7% 38.2% 30.9% 100.0%

.4% .3% .4% .8% 2.4% 1.9% 6.2%.6 1.8 1.3 -1.2 .4 -.75 0 0 5 22 40 72

6.9% .0% .0% 6.9% 30.6% 55.6% 100.0%.2% .0% .0% .2% .8% 1.5% 2.7%

.5 -1.4 -1.8 -2.0 -.8 3.1150 69 121 444 971 904 2659

5.6% 2.6% 4.6% 16.7% 36.5% 34.0% 100.0%5.6% 2.6% 4.6% 16.7% 36.5% 34.0% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advscour

Total

D 73

Table 52. My advisor interprets institutional requirements so that they are understandable to me -- Crosstabulation by College

6 6 7 20 60 74 1733.5% 3.5% 4.0% 11.6% 34.7% 42.8% 100.0%

.2% .2% .3% .8% 2.3% 2.8% 6.5%-1.2 .0 -.5 -1.5 -.3 2.0

29 30 26 112 223 165 5855.0% 5.1% 4.4% 19.1% 38.1% 28.2% 100.0%1.1% 1.1% 1.0% 4.2% 8.4% 6.2% 22.0%

-.6 2.2 -.4 1.7 .9 -2.419 10 19 66 182 209 505

3.8% 2.0% 3.8% 13.1% 36.0% 41.4% 100.0%.7% .4% .7% 2.5% 6.8% 7.8% 19.0%-1.7 -1.8 -1.1 -1.8 .1 2.8

34 10 21 63 105 65 29811.4% 3.4% 7.0% 21.1% 35.2% 21.8% 100.0%

1.3% .4% .8% 2.4% 3.9% 2.4% 11.2%4.3 -.1 1.8 2.1 -.2 -3.6

7 9 11 26 80 55 1883.7% 4.8% 5.9% 13.8% 42.6% 29.3% 100.0%

.3% .3% .4% 1.0% 3.0% 2.1% 7.1%-1.1 1.0 .7 -.8 1.5 -1.1

33 16 27 106 204 231 6175.3% 2.6% 4.4% 17.2% 33.1% 37.4% 100.0%1.2% .6% 1.0% 4.0% 7.7% 8.7% 23.2%

-.2 -1.1 -.5 .5 -1.2 1.54 0 6 7 26 18 61

6.6% .0% 9.8% 11.5% 42.6% 29.5% 100.0%.2% .0% .2% .3% 1.0% .7% 2.3%

.3 -1.5 1.8 -.9 .9 -.611 11 11 27 56 49 165

6.7% 6.7% 6.7% 16.4% 33.9% 29.7% 100.0%.4% .4% .4% 1.0% 2.1% 1.8% 6.2%

.6 2.2 1.1 .0 -.4 -.9


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

college

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advireq

Total

D 74

Table 52. My advisor interprets institutional requirements so that they are understandable to me -- Crosstabulation by College

5 0 0 7 20 40 726.9% .0% .0% 9.7% 27.8% 55.6% 100.0%

.2% .0% .0% .3% .8% 1.5% 2.7%.5 -1.6 -1.9 -1.4 -1.1 3.1

148 92 128 434 956 906 26645.6% 3.5% 4.8% 16.3% 35.9% 34.0% 100.0%5.6% 3.5% 4.8% 16.3% 35.9% 34.0% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advireq

Total

Table 53. My advisor gives me correct information on services/programs -- Crosstabulation by College

8 8 6 20 62 68 1724.7% 4.7% 3.5% 11.6% 36.0% 39.5% 100.0%

.3% .3% .2% .8% 2.3% 2.6% 6.5%-.8 .8 -.5 -2.1 .3 1.529 31 29 122 209 166 586

4.9% 5.3% 4.9% 20.8% 35.7% 28.3% 100.0%1.1% 1.2% 1.1% 4.6% 7.8% 6.2% 22.0%

-1.2 2.3 .8 1.4 .4 -2.020 13 19 78 184 190 504

4.0% 2.6% 3.8% 15.5% 36.5% 37.7% 100.0%.8% .5% .7% 2.9% 6.9% 7.1% 18.9%-2.0 -1.1 -.6 -1.5 .7 1.8

34 6 15 78 99 67 29911.4% 2.0% 5.0% 26.1% 33.1% 22.4% 100.0%

1.3% .2% .6% 2.9% 3.7% 2.5% 11.2%3.6 -1.4 .6 3.1 -.5 -3.2

8 12 16 34 72 45 1874.3% 6.4% 8.6% 18.2% 38.5% 24.1% 100.0%

.3% .5% .6% 1.3% 2.7% 1.7% 7.0%-1.1 2.1 2.8 -.1 .9 -2.1


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

college

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advcinfo

Total

D 75

Table 53. My advisor gives me correct information on services/programs -- Crosstabulation by College

45 14 22 98 202 237 6187.3% 2.3% 3.6% 15.9% 32.7% 38.3% 100.0%1.7% .5% .8% 3.7% 7.6% 8.9% 23.2%

1.1 -1.7 -.9 -1.5 -.8 2.33 1 2 16 19 21 62

4.8% 1.6% 3.2% 25.8% 30.6% 33.9% 100.0%.1% .0% .1% .6% .7% .8% 2.3%

-.4 -.8 -.4 1.4 -.5 .112 9 5 34 53 52 165

7.3% 5.5% 3.0% 20.6% 32.1% 31.5% 100.0%.5% .3% .2% 1.3% 2.0% 2.0% 6.2%

.6 1.3 -.8 .7 -.6 -.36 0 0 9 23 32 70

8.6% .0% .0% 12.9% 32.9% 45.7% 100.0%.2% .0% .0% .3% .9% 1.2% 2.6%

.8 -1.6 -1.7 -1.1 -.3 1.9165 94 114 489 923 878 2663

6.2% 3.5% 4.3% 18.4% 34.7% 33.0% 100.0%6.2% 3.5% 4.3% 18.4% 34.7% 33.0% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advcinfo

Total

Table 54. My advisor is well informed about changes in academic requirements and keeps me informed of pertinent changes -- Crosstabulation by College

3 13 5 21 47 84 1731.7% 7.5% 2.9% 12.1% 27.2% 48.6% 100.0%

.1% .5% .2% .8% 1.8% 3.2% 6.5%-1.7 1.6 -1.4 -1.7 -1.2 2.9

19 36 31 97 200 202 5853.2% 6.2% 5.3% 16.6% 34.2% 34.5% 100.0%

.7% 1.4% 1.2% 3.6% 7.5% 7.6% 22.0%-1.4 1.5 .0 -.6 .7 -.3


Agriculture

Business

college

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advinfor

Total

D 76

Table 54. My advisor is well informed about changes in academic requirements and keeps me informed of pertinent changes -- Crosstabulation by College

19 14 28 80 167 197 5053.8% 2.8% 5.5% 15.8% 33.1% 39.0% 100.0%

.7% .5% 1.1% 3.0% 6.3% 7.4% 19.0%-.7 -2.1 .2 -.9 .2 1.428 13 15 74 90 78 298

9.4% 4.4% 5.0% 24.8% 30.2% 26.2% 100.0%1.1% .5% .6% 2.8% 3.4% 2.9% 11.2%

4.0 -.3 -.2 3.0 -.7 -2.65 16 13 28 77 48 187

2.7% 8.6% 7.0% 15.0% 41.2% 25.7% 100.0%.2% .6% .5% 1.1% 2.9% 1.8% 7.0%-1.2 2.3 1.0 -.9 2.1 -2.2

32 23 32 116 188 227 6185.2% 3.7% 5.2% 18.8% 30.4% 36.7% 100.0%1.2% .9% 1.2% 4.4% 7.1% 8.5% 23.2%

.8 -1.2 -.1 .7 -.9 .61 3 6 12 20 20 62

1.6% 4.8% 9.7% 19.4% 32.3% 32.3% 100.0%.0% .1% .2% .5% .8% .8% 2.3%-1.1 .0 1.5 .3 .0 -.4

9 10 11 35 56 44 1655.5% 6.1% 6.7% 21.2% 33.9% 26.7% 100.0%

.3% .4% .4% 1.3% 2.1% 1.7% 6.2%.6 .7 .8 1.1 .3 -1.93 0 0 6 22 40 71

4.2% .0% .0% 8.5% 31.0% 56.3% 100.0%.1% .0% .0% .2% .8% 1.5% 2.7%

-.1 -1.8 -1.9 -1.8 -.2 3.0119 128 141 469 867 940 2664

4.5% 4.8% 5.3% 17.6% 32.5% 35.3% 100.0%4.5% 4.8% 5.3% 17.6% 32.5% 35.3% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advinfor

Total

D 77

Table 55. My advisor gives me advice in a straight forward understandable manner -- Crosstabulation by College

2 7 8 13 60 83 1731.2% 4.0% 4.6% 7.5% 34.7% 48.0% 100.0%

.1% .3% .3% .5% 2.2% 3.1% 6.5%-1.6 1.3 .9 -2.5 -.5 2.0

17 24 23 110 217 195 5862.9% 4.1% 3.9% 18.8% 37.0% 33.3% 100.0%

.6% .9% .9% 4.1% 8.1% 7.3% 22.0%-.8 2.4 .7 2.4 .0 -2.117 7 15 60 197 211 507

3.4% 1.4% 3.0% 11.8% 38.9% 41.6% 100.0%.6% .3% .6% 2.2% 7.4% 7.9% 19.0%

-.2 -1.6 -.6 -1.8 .7 1.126 6 12 51 120 84 299

8.7% 2.0% 4.0% 17.1% 40.1% 28.1% 100.0%1.0% .2% .4% 1.9% 4.5% 3.1% 11.2%

4.8 -.6 .6 .9 .9 -2.94 6 11 41 72 53 187

2.1% 3.2% 5.9% 21.9% 38.5% 28.3% 100.0%.1% .2% .4% 1.5% 2.7% 2.0% 7.0%-1.0 .6 1.8 2.5 .4 -2.3

18 11 11 87 211 278 6162.9% 1.8% 1.8% 14.1% 34.3% 45.1% 100.0%

.7% .4% .4% 3.3% 7.9% 10.4% 23.1%-.8 -1.1 -2.2 -.5 -1.1 2.6

0 0 4 8 22 28 62.0% .0% 6.5% 12.9% 35.5% 45.2% 100.0%.0% .0% .1% .3% .8% 1.0% 2.3%-1.5 -1.2 1.3 -.4 -.2 .8

6 6 7 25 69 52 1653.6% 3.6% 4.2% 15.2% 41.8% 31.5% 100.0%

.2% .2% .3% .9% 2.6% 1.9% 6.2%.1 .9 .6 .1 1.0 -1.5


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

college

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advadvic

Total

D 78

Table 55. My advisor gives me advice in a straight forward understandable manner -- Crosstabulation by College

3 0 0 4 17 48 724.2% .0% .0% 5.6% 23.6% 66.7% 100.0%

.1% .0% .0% .1% .6% 1.8% 2.7%.3 -1.3 -1.6 -2.1 -1.9 3.8

93 67 91 399 985 1032 26673.5% 2.5% 3.4% 15.0% 36.9% 38.7% 100.0%3.5% 2.5% 3.4% 15.0% 36.9% 38.7% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advadvic

Total

Table 56. My advisor tells me why she/he offers particular advice -- Crosstabulation by College

13 7 10 23 54 65 1727.6% 4.1% 5.8% 13.4% 31.4% 37.8% 100.0%

.5% .3% .4% .9% 2.0% 2.4% 6.5%.1 .8 -.1 -2.9 .2 2.1

52 22 39 166 173 135 5878.9% 3.7% 6.6% 28.3% 29.5% 23.0% 100.0%2.0% .8% 1.5% 6.2% 6.5% 5.1% 22.0%

1.3 1.1 .6 2.0 -.4 -2.739 9 29 106 164 159 506

7.7% 1.8% 5.7% 20.9% 32.4% 31.4% 100.0%1.5% .3% 1.1% 4.0% 6.2% 6.0% 19.0%

.2 -1.5 -.2 -1.5 .8 1.030 9 17 90 93 59 298

10.1% 3.0% 5.7% 30.2% 31.2% 19.8% 100.0%1.1% .3% .6% 3.4% 3.5% 2.2% 11.2%

1.7 .1 -.2 2.1 .3 -2.99 6 25 60 54 33 187

4.8% 3.2% 13.4% 32.1% 28.9% 17.6% 100.0%.3% .2% .9% 2.3% 2.0% 1.2% 7.0%-1.3 .2 4.1 2.2 -.4 -2.9


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

college

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advtells

Total

D 79

Table 56. My advisor tells me why she/he offers particular advice -- Crosstabulation by College

33 14 24 136 185 225 6175.3% 2.3% 3.9% 22.0% 30.0% 36.5% 100.0%1.2% .5% .9% 5.1% 6.9% 8.4% 23.1%

-1.9 -1.0 -2.1 -1.1 -.2 3.41 0 5 15 19 22 62

1.6% .0% 8.1% 24.2% 30.6% 35.5% 100.0%.0% .0% .2% .6% .7% .8% 2.3%-1.7 -1.4 .7 .0 .0 .9

15 12 11 39 48 40 1659.1% 7.3% 6.7% 23.6% 29.1% 24.2% 100.0%

.6% .5% .4% 1.5% 1.8% 1.5% 6.2%.8 3.2 .3 -.2 -.3 -1.16 0 0 11 20 35 72

8.3% .0% .0% 15.3% 27.8% 48.6% 100.0%.2% .0% .0% .4% .8% 1.3% 2.7%

.3 -1.5 -2.1 -1.5 -.4 3.1198 79 160 646 810 773 2666

7.4% 3.0% 6.0% 24.2% 30.4% 29.0% 100.0%7.4% 3.0% 6.0% 24.2% 30.4% 29.0% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advtells

Total

Table 57. My advisor encourages me to participate in extracurricular activities -- Crosstabulation by College

27 7 15 34 36 54 17315.6% 4.0% 8.7% 19.7% 20.8% 31.2% 100.0%

1.0% .3% .6% 1.3% 1.4% 2.0% 6.5%.5 -.5 -1.1 -2.6 .9 2.9

90 35 62 174 113 111 58515.4% 6.0% 10.6% 29.7% 19.3% 19.0% 100.0%

3.4% 1.3% 2.3% 6.6% 4.3% 4.2% 22.0%.8 1.2 -.6 -.4 .8 -1.1


Agriculture

Business

college

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advextra

Total

D 80

Table 57. My advisor encourages me to participate in extracurricular activities -- Crosstabulation by College

72 23 63 171 80 97 50614.2% 4.5% 12.5% 33.8% 15.8% 19.2% 100.0%

2.7% .9% 2.4% 6.4% 3.0% 3.7% 19.1%.0 -.3 .7 1.3 -1.1 -.9

44 17 43 114 37 43 29814.8% 5.7% 14.4% 38.3% 12.4% 14.4% 100.0%

1.7% .6% 1.6% 4.3% 1.4% 1.6% 11.2%.3 .7 1.6 2.4 -2.3 -2.5

18 11 35 64 34 24 1869.7% 5.9% 18.8% 34.4% 18.3% 12.9% 100.0%

.7% .4% 1.3% 2.4% 1.3% .9% 7.0%-1.6 .7 3.0 .9 .1 -2.4

85 19 54 166 124 164 61213.9% 3.1% 8.8% 27.1% 20.3% 26.8% 100.0%

3.2% .7% 2.0% 6.3% 4.7% 6.2% 23.0%-.2 -2.0 -1.9 -1.6 1.3 3.1

5 2 7 19 11 17 618.2% 3.3% 11.5% 31.1% 18.0% 27.9% 100.0%

.2% .1% .3% .7% .4% .6% 2.3%-1.2 -.6 .0 .1 .0 1.2

24 15 18 52 27 28 16414.6% 9.1% 11.0% 31.7% 16.5% 17.1% 100.0%

.9% .6% .7% 2.0% 1.0% 1.1% 6.2%.2 2.5 -.1 .3 -.5 -1.1

11 0 5 19 15 21 7115.5% .0% 7.0% 26.8% 21.1% 29.6% 100.0%

.4% .0% .2% .7% .6% .8% 2.7%.3 -1.9 -1.1 -.6 .6 1.6

376 129 302 813 477 559 265614.2% 4.9% 11.4% 30.6% 18.0% 21.0% 100.0%14.2% 4.9% 11.4% 30.6% 18.0% 21.0% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advextra

Total

D 81

Table 58. My advisor appears to be well trained -- Crosstabulation by College

2 9 7 11 49 95 1731.2% 5.2% 4.0% 6.4% 28.3% 54.9% 100.0%

.1% .3% .3% .4% 1.8% 3.6% 6.5%-1.3 1.1 .2 -2.7 -1.1 2.5

15 27 29 101 207 206 5852.6% 4.6% 5.0% 17.3% 35.4% 35.2% 100.0%

.6% 1.0% 1.1% 3.8% 7.8% 7.7% 22.0%-.3 1.2 1.5 2.2 .9 -2.813 10 16 53 165 249 506

2.6% 2.0% 3.2% 10.5% 32.6% 49.2% 100.0%.5% .4% .6% 2.0% 6.2% 9.3% 19.0%

-.2 -2.0 -.7 -2.1 -.2 2.219 10 8 61 119 81 298

6.4% 3.4% 2.7% 20.5% 39.9% 27.2% 100.0%.7% .4% .3% 2.3% 4.5% 3.0% 11.2%3.8 -.3 -1.0 3.0 2.0 -4.1

1 12 11 35 63 65 187.5% 6.4% 5.9% 18.7% 33.7% 34.8% 100.0%.0% .5% .4% 1.3% 2.4% 2.4% 7.0%-1.8 2.0 1.5 1.8 .1 -1.7

19 17 18 67 185 311 6173.1% 2.8% 2.9% 10.9% 30.0% 50.4% 100.0%

.7% .6% .7% 2.5% 6.9% 11.7% 23.2%.5 -1.2 -1.1 -2.0 -1.4 2.90 0 1 7 20 34 62

.0% .0% 1.6% 11.3% 32.3% 54.8% 100.0%

.0% .0% .0% .3% .8% 1.3% 2.3%-1.3 -1.5 -.9 -.6 -.1 1.5

2 12 10 31 56 54 1651.2% 7.3% 6.1% 18.8% 33.9% 32.7% 100.0%

.1% .5% .4% 1.2% 2.1% 2.0% 6.2%-1.2 2.4 1.5 1.7 .2 -2.0


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

college

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advtrain

Total

D 82

Table 58. My advisor appears to be well trained -- Crosstabulation by College

2 0 0 5 21 43 712.8% .0% .0% 7.0% 29.6% 60.6% 100.0%

.1% .0% .0% .2% .8% 1.6% 2.7%.0 -1.6 -1.6 -1.6 -.5 2.3

73 97 100 371 885 1138 26642.7% 3.6% 3.8% 13.9% 33.2% 42.7% 100.0%2.7% 3.6% 3.8% 13.9% 33.2% 42.7% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advtrain

Total

Table 59. Interactions with my advisor are positive -- Crosstabulation by College

1 6 6 14 46 97 170.6% 3.5% 3.5% 8.2% 27.1% 57.1% 100.0%.0% .2% .2% .5% 1.7% 3.7% 6.4%-1.6 .2 -.4 -1.7 -1.3 2.5

11 21 23 92 224 216 5871.9% 3.6% 3.9% 15.7% 38.2% 36.8% 100.0%

.4% .8% .9% 3.5% 8.4% 8.1% 22.1%-1.1 .5 -.3 1.8 2.3 -2.7

13 7 16 48 154 264 5022.6% 1.4% 3.2% 9.6% 30.7% 52.6% 100.0%

.5% .3% .6% 1.8% 5.8% 9.9% 18.9%.0 -2.3 -1.1 -2.2 -.8 2.8

18 12 21 61 106 79 2976.1% 4.0% 7.1% 20.5% 35.7% 26.6% 100.0%

.7% .5% .8% 2.3% 4.0% 3.0% 11.2%3.7 .8 2.4 3.6 .9 -4.6

3 16 13 32 61 61 1861.6% 8.6% 7.0% 17.2% 32.8% 32.8% 100.0%

.1% .6% .5% 1.2% 2.3% 2.3% 7.0%-.8 4.1 1.9 1.6 .0 -2.3


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

college

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advpost

Total

D 83

Table 59. Interactions with my advisor are positive -- Crosstabulation by College

18 11 18 64 192 311 6142.9% 1.8% 2.9% 10.4% 31.3% 50.7% 100.0%

.7% .4% .7% 2.4% 7.2% 11.7% 23.1%.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.8 -.7 2.40 2 1 8 20 31 62

.0% 3.2% 1.6% 12.9% 32.3% 50.0% 100.0%

.0% .1% .0% .3% .8% 1.2% 2.3%-1.3 .0 -1.0 .0 -.1 .7

3 10 12 22 50 68 1651.8% 6.1% 7.3% 13.3% 30.3% 41.2% 100.0%

.1% .4% .5% .8% 1.9% 2.6% 6.2%-.6 2.1 1.9 .1 -.6 -.6

2 0 1 5 18 45 712.8% .0% 1.4% 7.0% 25.4% 63.4% 100.0%

.1% .0% .0% .2% .7% 1.7% 2.7%.1 -1.5 -1.1 -1.4 -1.1 2.4

69 85 111 346 871 1172 26542.6% 3.2% 4.2% 13.0% 32.8% 44.2% 100.0%2.6% 3.2% 4.2% 13.0% 32.8% 44.2% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advpost

Total

Table 60. I don't have to wait long between scheduling and seeing my advisor -- Crosstabulation by College

6 7 9 20 53 77 1723.5% 4.1% 5.2% 11.6% 30.8% 44.8% 100.0%

.2% .3% .3% .8% 2.0% 2.9% 6.5%-.7 -.6 -1.0 -1.5 -.6 2.731 27 49 90 219 173 589

5.3% 4.6% 8.3% 15.3% 37.2% 29.4% 100.0%1.2% 1.0% 1.8% 3.4% 8.2% 6.5% 22.1%

.8 -.6 .8 -.6 1.6 -1.6


Agriculture

Business

college

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advnowt

Total

D 84

Table 60. I don't have to wait long between scheduling and seeing my advisor -- Crosstabulation by College

22 23 29 75 172 185 5064.3% 4.5% 5.7% 14.8% 34.0% 36.6% 100.0%

.8% .9% 1.1% 2.8% 6.5% 7.0% 19.0%-.2 -.6 -1.4 -.8 .2 1.421 29 44 79 76 46 295

7.1% 9.8% 14.9% 26.8% 25.8% 15.6% 100.0%.8% 1.1% 1.7% 3.0% 2.9% 1.7% 11.1%2.1 3.5 4.7 4.4 -2.3 -5.2

8 16 16 38 71 36 1854.3% 8.6% 8.6% 20.5% 38.4% 19.5% 100.0%

.3% .6% .6% 1.4% 2.7% 1.4% 7.0%-.1 2.1 .6 1.4 1.2 -3.223 20 34 100 200 240 617

3.7% 3.2% 5.5% 16.2% 32.4% 38.9% 100.0%.9% .8% 1.3% 3.8% 7.5% 9.0% 23.2%-1.0 -2.1 -1.7 -.1 -.4 2.5

0 0 2 6 25 29 62.0% .0% 3.2% 9.7% 40.3% 46.8% 100.0%.0% .0% .1% .2% .9% 1.1% 2.3%-1.7 -1.8 -1.2 -1.3 .9 1.9

7 9 6 16 60 66 1644.3% 5.5% 3.7% 9.8% 36.6% 40.2% 100.0%

.3% .3% .2% .6% 2.3% 2.5% 6.2%-.2 .2 -1.8 -2.1 .7 1.6

3 7 8 11 14 28 714.2% 9.9% 11.3% 15.5% 19.7% 39.4% 100.0%

.1% .3% .3% .4% .5% 1.1% 2.7%-.1 1.7 1.2 -.2 -2.0 .9

121 138 197 435 890 880 26614.5% 5.2% 7.4% 16.3% 33.4% 33.1% 100.0%4.5% 5.2% 7.4% 16.3% 33.4% 33.1% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advnowt

Total

D 85

Table 61. Overall I am satisfied with the advising system at USU -- Crosstabulation by College

1 9 22 21 59 60 172.6% 5.2% 12.8% 12.2% 34.3% 34.9% 100.0%.0% .3% .8% .8% 2.2% 2.3% 6.5%-1.4 -1.0 1.3 -2.3 .4 1.6

8 46 54 123 206 151 5881.4% 7.8% 9.2% 20.9% 35.0% 25.7% 100.0%

.3% 1.7% 2.0% 4.6% 7.7% 5.7% 22.1%-1.2 .5 -.4 .6 1.1 -1.2

14 24 33 75 163 195 5042.8% 4.8% 6.5% 14.9% 32.3% 38.7% 100.0%

.5% .9% 1.2% 2.8% 6.1% 7.3% 18.9%1.0 -2.1 -2.3 -2.5 -.1 4.310 27 46 78 92 46 299

3.3% 9.0% 15.4% 26.1% 30.8% 15.4% 100.0%.4% 1.0% 1.7% 2.9% 3.5% 1.7% 11.2%1.5 1.1 3.1 2.4 -.5 -4.2

0 17 30 43 63 35 188.0% 9.0% 16.0% 22.9% 33.5% 18.6% 100.0%.0% .6% 1.1% 1.6% 2.4% 1.3% 7.1%-2.0 .9 2.7 .9 .2 -2.5

20 42 48 126 198 183 6173.2% 6.8% 7.8% 20.4% 32.1% 29.7% 100.0%

.8% 1.6% 1.8% 4.7% 7.4% 6.9% 23.2%2.0 -.5 -1.5 .3 -.2 .6

0 6 3 12 20 20 61.0% 9.8% 4.9% 19.7% 32.8% 32.8% 100.0%.0% .2% .1% .5% .8% .8% 2.3%-1.1 .7 -1.2 .0 .0 .6

2 21 19 42 47 33 1641.2% 12.8% 11.6% 25.6% 28.7% 20.1% 100.0%

.1% .8% .7% 1.6% 1.8% 1.2% 6.2%-.8 2.6 .8 1.6 -.9 -2.0


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

college

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advsusu

Total

D 86

Table 61. Overall I am satisfied with the advising system at USU -- Crosstabulation by College

1 3 4 10 19 34 711.4% 4.2% 5.6% 14.1% 26.8% 47.9% 100.0%

.0% .1% .2% .4% .7% 1.3% 2.7%-.4 -1.0 -1.1 -1.1 -.9 3.156 195 259 530 867 757 2664

2.1% 7.3% 9.7% 19.9% 32.5% 28.4% 100.0%2.1% 7.3% 9.7% 19.9% 32.5% 28.4% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advsusu

Total

Table 62. Overall I am satisfied with the advising system in my college/department -- Crosstabulation by College

1 7 11 16 56 82 173.6% 4.0% 6.4% 9.2% 32.4% 47.4% 100.0%.0% .3% .4% .6% 2.1% 3.1% 6.5%-1.3 -1.4 -.9 -2.2 -.1 2.9

11 46 47 107 214 161 5861.9% 7.8% 8.0% 18.3% 36.5% 27.5% 100.0%

.4% 1.7% 1.8% 4.0% 8.0% 6.0% 22.0%-.1 1.1 -.2 1.5 1.6 -2.912 21 25 57 164 226 505

2.4% 4.2% 5.0% 11.3% 32.5% 44.8% 100.0%.4% .8% .9% 2.1% 6.1% 8.5% 18.9%

.7 -2.2 -2.6 -2.6 -.1 3.910 25 45 69 95 55 299

3.3% 8.4% 15.1% 23.1% 31.8% 18.4% 100.0%.4% .9% 1.7% 2.6% 3.6% 2.1% 11.2%1.7 1.1 4.1 3.2 -.3 -4.8

0 23 21 35 65 44 188.0% 12.2% 11.2% 18.6% 34.6% 23.4% 100.0%.0% .9% .8% 1.3% 2.4% 1.6% 7.0%-1.9 2.9 1.4 1.0 .5 -2.6


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

college

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advsdept

Total

D 87

Table 62. Overall I am satisfied with the advising system in my college/department -- Crosstabulation by College

15 31 48 86 193 246 6192.4% 5.0% 7.8% 13.9% 31.2% 39.7% 100.0%

.6% 1.2% 1.8% 3.2% 7.2% 9.2% 23.2%.8 -1.6 -.4 -1.2 -.6 2.20 1 6 7 21 27 62

.0% 1.6% 9.7% 11.3% 33.9% 43.5% 100.0%

.0% .0% .2% .3% .8% 1.0% 2.3%-1.1 -1.5 .4 -.9 .2 1.2

2 23 16 37 43 44 1651.2% 13.9% 9.7% 22.4% 26.1% 26.7% 100.0%

.1% .9% .6% 1.4% 1.6% 1.6% 6.2%-.7 3.6 .6 2.1 -1.5 -1.7

1 2 1 8 20 39 711.4% 2.8% 1.4% 11.3% 28.2% 54.9% 100.0%

.0% .1% .0% .3% .7% 1.5% 2.7%-.3 -1.3 -2.0 -1.0 -.7 2.952 179 220 422 871 924 2668

1.9% 6.7% 8.2% 15.8% 32.6% 34.6% 100.0%1.9% 6.7% 8.2% 15.8% 32.6% 34.6% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advsdept

Total

Table 63. Overall I am satisfied with my advisor -- Crosstabulation by College

1 7 11 10 40 104 173.6% 4.0% 6.4% 5.8% 23.1% 60.1% 100.0%.0% .3% .4% .4% 1.5% 3.9% 6.5%-1.4 -.5 .5 -2.6 -2.0 3.5

9 33 26 92 217 207 5841.5% 5.7% 4.5% 15.8% 37.2% 35.4% 100.0%

.3% 1.2% 1.0% 3.5% 8.1% 7.8% 21.9%-.9 .8 -1.0 1.9 2.4 -2.8


Agriculture

Business

college

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advsatis

Total

D 88

Table 63. Overall I am satisfied with my advisor -- Crosstabulation by College

10 21 20 45 155 255 5062.0% 4.2% 4.0% 8.9% 30.6% 50.4% 100.0%

.4% .8% .8% 1.7% 5.8% 9.6% 19.0%-.1 -.8 -1.4 -2.6 -.4 2.613 17 29 66 102 72 299

4.3% 5.7% 9.7% 22.1% 34.1% 24.1% 100.0%.5% .6% 1.1% 2.5% 3.8% 2.7% 11.2%2.7 .6 3.2 4.4 .7 -5.0

1 18 18 30 66 56 189.5% 9.5% 9.5% 15.9% 34.9% 29.6% 100.0%.0% .7% .7% 1.1% 2.5% 2.1% 7.1%-1.5 2.8 2.4 1.1 .8 -2.8

16 18 26 68 189 299 6162.6% 2.9% 4.2% 11.0% 30.7% 48.5% 100.0%

.6% .7% 1.0% 2.6% 7.1% 11.2% 23.1%.9 -2.3 -1.3 -1.3 -.4 2.10 1 3 7 16 35 62

.0% 1.6% 4.8% 11.3% 25.8% 56.5% 100.0%

.0% .0% .1% .3% .6% 1.3% 2.3%-1.1 -1.2 -.2 -.4 -.8 1.6

4 16 11 24 43 67 1652.4% 9.7% 6.7% 14.5% 26.1% 40.6% 100.0%

.2% .6% .4% .9% 1.6% 2.5% 6.2%.3 2.7 .7 .6 -1.3 -.51 1 0 4 16 48 70

1.4% 1.4% .0% 5.7% 22.9% 68.6% 100.0%.0% .0% .0% .2% .6% 1.8% 2.6%

-.4 -1.3 -1.9 -1.7 -1.3 3.355 132 144 346 844 1143 2664

2.1% 5.0% 5.4% 13.0% 31.7% 42.9% 100.0%2.1% 5.0% 5.4% 13.0% 31.7% 42.9% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

NotApplicable


StronglyAgree

advsatis

Total

D 89

Table 64. Courses for the semester -- Crosstabulation by College

95 59 12 4 1 17155.6% 34.5% 7.0% 2.3% .6% 100.0%

3.8% 2.4% .5% .2% .0% 6.8%1.7 -.6 -2.1 .1 -.2

244 207 76 11 7 54544.8% 38.0% 13.9% 2.0% 1.3% 100.0%

9.7% 8.3% 3.0% .4% .3% 21.8%-.7 .2 .8 -.3 1.6

261 169 55 8 0 49352.9% 34.3% 11.2% 1.6% .0% 100.0%10.4% 6.7% 2.2% .3% .0% 19.7%

2.0 -1.1 -1.0 -.9 -1.990 121 43 10 1 265

34.0% 45.7% 16.2% 3.8% .4% 100.0%3.6% 4.8% 1.7% .4% .0% 10.6%

-3.1 2.2 1.6 1.7 -.769 81 22 5 2 179

38.5% 45.3% 12.3% 2.8% 1.1% 100.0%2.8% 3.2% .9% .2% .1% 7.1%

-1.6 1.7 -.2 .5 .6281 201 73 12 4 571

49.2% 35.2% 12.8% 2.1% .7% 100.0%11.2% 8.0% 2.9% .5% .2% 22.8%

.8 -.9 .0 -.2 -.134 22 4 1 0 61

55.7% 36.1% 6.6% 1.6% .0% 100.0%1.4% .9% .2% .0% .0% 2.4%

1.0 -.2 -1.4 -.3 -.755 59 29 5 3 151

36.4% 39.1% 19.2% 3.3% 2.0% 100.0%2.2% 2.4% 1.2% .2% .1% 6.0%

-1.9 .3 2.2 .9 1.8


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

collegeVery Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied

VeryDissatisfied

topcours

Total

D 90

Table 64. Courses for the semester -- Crosstabulation by College

44 18 6 0 0 6864.7% 26.5% 8.8% .0% .0% 100.0%

1.8% .7% .2% .0% .0% 2.7%2.2 -1.5 -.9 -1.2 -.7

1173 937 320 56 18 250446.8% 37.4% 12.8% 2.2% .7% 100.0%46.8% 37.4% 12.8% 2.2% .7% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total

Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral DissatisfiedVery

Dissatisfied

topcours

Total

Table 65. Degree requirements -- Crosstabulation by College

95 60 9 5 1 17055.9% 35.3% 5.3% 2.9% .6% 100.0%

3.7% 2.4% .4% .2% .0% 6.7%1.5 -.7 -1.9 .1 -.3

247 235 59 11 4 55644.4% 42.3% 10.6% 2.0% .7% 100.0%

9.7% 9.2% 2.3% .4% .2% 21.9%-1.2 1.4 .6 -1.1 -.3273 176 40 10 1 500

54.6% 35.2% 8.0% 2.0% .2% 100.0%10.7% 6.9% 1.6% .4% .0% 19.7%

2.1 -1.2 -1.3 -1.0 -1.585 129 35 13 2 264

32.2% 48.9% 13.3% 4.9% .8% 100.0%3.3% 5.1% 1.4% .5% .1% 10.4%

-3.7 2.7 1.8 2.1 -.171 82 16 7 3 179

39.7% 45.8% 8.9% 3.9% 1.7% 100.0%2.8% 3.2% .6% .3% .1% 7.0%

-1.6 1.6 -.4 .9 1.3


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life


VeryDissatisfied

topdegre

Total

D 91

Table 65. Degree requirements -- Crosstabulation by College

302 199 62 16 6 58551.6% 34.0% 10.6% 2.7% 1.0% 100.0%11.9% 7.8% 2.4% .6% .2% 23.0%

1.2 -1.8 .6 .0 .534 19 7 2 0 62

54.8% 30.6% 11.3% 3.2% .0% 100.0%1.3% .7% .3% .1% .0% 2.4%

.8 -1.0 .4 .2 -.767 60 18 6 4 155

43.2% 38.7% 11.6% 3.9% 2.6% 100.0%2.6% 2.4% .7% .2% .2% 6.1%

-.9 .0 .7 .8 2.447 19 4 0 0 70

67.1% 27.1% 5.7% .0% .0% 100.0%1.8% .7% .2% .0% .0% 2.8%

2.3 -1.5 -1.1 -1.4 -.81221 979 250 70 21 2541

48.1% 38.5% 9.8% 2.8% .8% 100.0%48.1% 38.5% 9.8% 2.8% .8% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Dissatisfied

topdegre

Total

Table 66. Major requirements -- Crosstabulation by College

92 62 9 4 1 16854.8% 36.9% 5.4% 2.4% .6% 100.0%

3.6% 2.4% .4% .2% .0% 6.6%1.3 -.5 -1.8 .1 -.3

243 236 57 15 5 55643.7% 42.4% 10.3% 2.7% .9% 100.0%

9.6% 9.3% 2.2% .6% .2% 21.9%-1.4 1.2 .4 .7 .2


Agriculture

Business


VeryDissatisfied

topmajor

Total

D 92

Table 66. Major requirements -- Crosstabulation by College

285 170 37 7 2 50156.9% 33.9% 7.4% 1.4% .4% 100.0%11.2% 6.7% 1.5% .3% .1% 19.8%

2.9 -1.9 -1.7 -1.3 -1.185 136 36 9 2 268

31.7% 50.7% 13.4% 3.4% .7% 100.0%3.4% 5.4% 1.4% .4% .1% 10.6%

-3.8 3.0 1.9 1.2 -.169 85 15 7 3 179

38.5% 47.5% 8.4% 3.9% 1.7% 100.0%2.7% 3.4% .6% .3% .1% 7.1%

-1.8 1.8 -.6 1.5 1.2296 213 63 8 4 584

50.7% 36.5% 10.8% 1.4% .7% 100.0%11.7% 8.4% 2.5% .3% .2% 23.0%

1.0 -1.1 .8 -1.4 -.438 16 7 1 0 62

61.3% 25.8% 11.3% 1.6% .0% 100.0%1.5% .6% .3% .0% .0% 2.4%

1.5 -1.7 .4 -.3 -.765 61 17 6 4 153

42.5% 39.9% 11.1% 3.9% 2.6% 100.0%2.6% 2.4% .7% .2% .2% 6.0%

-1.0 .1 .5 1.4 2.441 17 7 0 0 65

63.1% 26.2% 10.8% .0% .0% 100.0%1.6% .7% .3% .0% .0% 2.6%

1.8 -1.7 .3 -1.2 -.71214 996 248 57 21 2536

47.9% 39.3% 9.8% 2.2% .8% 100.0%47.9% 39.3% 9.8% 2.2% .8% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Dissatisfied

topmajor

Total

D 93

Table 67. Minor requirements -- Crosstabulation by College

48 34 39 7 5 13336.1% 25.6% 29.3% 5.3% 3.8% 100.0%

2.4% 1.7% 1.9% .3% .2% 6.6%.9 -.5 -.6 .4 .3

120 130 149 13 9 42128.5% 30.9% 35.4% 3.1% 2.1% 100.0%

5.9% 6.4% 7.4% .6% .4% 20.8%-1.2 1.2 1.1 -1.4 -1.3164 121 103 20 9 417

39.3% 29.0% 24.7% 4.8% 2.2% 100.0%8.1% 6.0% 5.1% 1.0% .4% 20.6%

2.7 .4 -2.8 .2 -1.351 67 80 13 9 220

23.2% 30.5% 36.4% 5.9% 4.1% 100.0%2.5% 3.3% 4.0% .6% .4% 10.9%

-2.3 .7 1.0 .9 .635 43 49 9 10 146

24.0% 29.5% 33.6% 6.2% 6.8% 100.0%1.7% 2.1% 2.4% .4% .5% 7.2%

-1.7 .4 .3 .9 2.4154 105 162 19 19 459

33.6% 22.9% 35.3% 4.1% 4.1% 100.0%7.6% 5.2% 8.0% .9% .9% 22.7%

.6 -2.0 1.1 -.5 1.015 11 18 2 1 47

31.9% 23.4% 38.3% 4.3% 2.1% 100.0%.7% .5% .9% .1% .0% 2.3%

.0 -.6 .7 -.1 -.430 37 43 9 5 124

24.2% 29.8% 34.7% 7.3% 4.0% 100.0%1.5% 1.8% 2.1% .4% .2% 6.1%

-1.5 .4 .5 1.4 .4


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science


VeryDissatisfied

topminor

Total

D 94

Table 67. Minor requirements -- Crosstabulation by College

28 16 12 1 0 5749.1% 28.1% 21.1% 1.8% .0% 100.0%

1.4% .8% .6% .0% .0% 2.8%2.3 .0 -1.5 -1.0 -1.4

645 564 655 93 67 202431.9% 27.9% 32.4% 4.6% 3.3% 100.0%31.9% 27.9% 32.4% 4.6% 3.3% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total


Dissatisfied

topminor

Total

Table 68. General Education requirements -- Crosstabulation by College

77 48 24 4 7 16048.1% 30.0% 15.0% 2.5% 4.4% 100.0%

3.4% 2.1% 1.1% .2% .3% 7.1%2.1 -.8 -1.8 -1.1 1.5

176 171 104 22 9 48236.5% 35.5% 21.6% 4.6% 1.9% 100.0%

7.8% 7.6% 4.6% 1.0% .4% 21.4%-.5 .6 .1 .3 -.9

206 155 76 13 5 45545.3% 34.1% 16.7% 2.9% 1.1% 100.0%

9.1% 6.9% 3.4% .6% .2% 20.2%2.6 .1 -2.2 -1.5 -1.964 96 60 11 9 240

26.7% 40.0% 25.0% 4.6% 3.8% 100.0%2.8% 4.3% 2.7% .5% .4% 10.7%

-2.8 1.6 1.2 .2 1.254 65 34 5 3 161

33.5% 40.4% 21.1% 3.1% 1.9% 100.0%2.4% 2.9% 1.5% .2% .1% 7.1%

-.9 1.4 -.1 -.7 -.5


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life


VeryDissatisfied

topgened

Total

D 95

Table 68. General Education requirements -- Crosstabulation by College

175 152 131 29 16 50334.8% 30.2% 26.0% 5.8% 3.2% 100.0%

7.8% 6.7% 5.8% 1.3% .7% 22.3%-1.1 -1.4 2.2 1.6 1.0

20 18 11 4 0 5337.7% 34.0% 20.8% 7.5% .0% 100.0%

.9% .8% .5% .2% .0% 2.4%.0 .0 -.1 1.1 -1.1

43 39 34 9 7 13232.6% 29.5% 25.8% 6.8% 5.3% 100.0%

1.9% 1.7% 1.5% .4% .3% 5.9%-1.0 -.9 1.1 1.4 2.1

39 19 9 0 0 6758.2% 28.4% 13.4% .0% .0% 100.0%

1.7% .8% .4% .0% .0% 3.0%2.7 -.8 -1.4 -1.7 -1.3

854 763 483 97 56 225337.9% 33.9% 21.4% 4.3% 2.5% 100.0%37.9% 33.9% 21.4% 4.3% 2.5% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Dissatisfied

topgened

Total

Table 69. Selecting or changing your major -- Crosstabulation by College

52 28 39 4 2 12541.6% 22.4% 31.2% 3.2% 1.6% 100.0%

2.7% 1.5% 2.1% .2% .1% 6.6%2.1 -1.1 -.9 .4 -.7

122 124 147 15 11 41929.1% 29.6% 35.1% 3.6% 2.6% 100.0%

6.4% 6.5% 7.7% .8% .6% 22.0%-.8 .8 -.3 1.2 .1


Agriculture

Business


VeryDissatisfied

topchange

Total

D 96

Table 69. Selecting or changing your major -- Crosstabulation by College

120 112 125 5 11 37332.2% 30.0% 33.5% 1.3% 2.9% 100.0%

6.3% 5.9% 6.6% .3% .6% 19.6%.3 .9 -.8 -1.5 .5

31 54 92 6 6 18916.4% 28.6% 48.7% 3.2% 3.2% 100.0%

1.6% 2.8% 4.8% .3% .3% 9.9%-3.7 .2 2.9 .5 .6

45 43 45 8 4 14531.0% 29.7% 31.0% 5.5% 2.8% 100.0%

2.4% 2.3% 2.4% .4% .2% 7.6%-.1 .5 -1.0 2.1 .2

153 115 164 7 10 44934.1% 25.6% 36.5% 1.6% 2.2% 100.0%

8.0% 6.0% 8.6% .4% .5% 23.6%1.0 -.8 .2 -1.4 -.415 13 14 0 1 43

34.9% 30.2% 32.6% .0% 2.3% 100.0%.8% .7% .7% .0% .1% 2.3%

.4 .3 -.4 -1.1 -.123 22 45 5 3 98

23.5% 22.4% 45.9% 5.1% 3.1% 100.0%1.2% 1.2% 2.4% .3% .2% 5.2%

-1.4 -1.0 1.7 1.5 .335 15 11 0 0 61

57.4% 24.6% 18.0% .0% .0% 100.0%1.8% .8% .6% .0% .0% 3.2%

3.6 -.5 -2.3 -1.3 -1.2596 526 682 50 48 1902

31.3% 27.7% 35.9% 2.6% 2.5% 100.0%31.3% 27.7% 35.9% 2.6% 2.5% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Dissatisfied

topchange

Total

D 97

Table 70. Transfer credit -- Crosstabulation by College

60 34 31 9 3 13743.8% 24.8% 22.6% 6.6% 2.2% 100.0%

3.1% 1.7% 1.6% .5% .2% 7.1%2.5 -.8 -1.9 1.5 -.7

115 127 140 17 16 41527.7% 30.6% 33.7% 4.1% 3.9% 100.0%

5.9% 6.5% 7.2% .9% .8% 21.4%-1.5 .7 .6 .1 .6153 124 90 13 12 392

39.0% 31.6% 23.0% 3.3% 3.1% 100.0%7.9% 6.4% 4.6% .7% .6% 20.2%

2.5 1.1 -3.2 -.7 -.354 58 86 10 7 215

25.1% 27.0% 40.0% 4.7% 3.3% 100.0%2.8% 3.0% 4.4% .5% .4% 11.1%

-1.8 -.5 2.1 .5 -.137 39 49 6 6 137

27.0% 28.5% 35.8% 4.4% 4.4% 100.0%1.9% 2.0% 2.5% .3% .3% 7.1%

-1.0 .0 .8 .2 .7138 112 151 16 16 433

31.9% 25.9% 34.9% 3.7% 3.7% 100.0%7.1% 5.8% 7.8% .8% .8% 22.3%

.0 -1.1 1.1 -.3 .416 8 19 2 1 46

34.8% 17.4% 41.3% 4.3% 2.2% 100.0%.8% .4% 1.0% .1% .1% 2.4%

.3 -1.4 1.1 .1 -.423 36 40 5 3 107

21.5% 33.6% 37.4% 4.7% 2.8% 100.0%1.2% 1.9% 2.1% .3% .2% 5.5%

-1.9 1.0 1.0 .3 -.3


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science


VeryDissatisfied

toptrans

Total

D 98

Table 70. Transfer credit -- Crosstabulation by College

25 19 16 0 1 6141.0% 31.1% 26.2% .0% 1.6% 100.0%

1.3% 1.0% .8% .0% .1% 3.1%1.2 .4 -.8 -1.6 -.7

621 557 622 78 65 194332.0% 28.7% 32.0% 4.0% 3.3% 100.0%32.0% 28.7% 32.0% 4.0% 3.3% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total


Dissatisfied

toptrans

Total

Table 71. Registration procedures (drop/add, closed courses) -- Crosstabulation by College

65 49 28 5 2 14943.6% 32.9% 18.8% 3.4% 1.3% 100.0%

3.3% 2.5% 1.4% .3% .1% 7.5%1.9 .1 -2.1 .4 -.7

137 143 128 17 11 43631.4% 32.8% 29.4% 3.9% 2.5% 100.0%

6.9% 7.2% 6.5% .9% .6% 22.1%-1.1 .1 .6 1.4 .5166 136 78 9 5 394

42.1% 34.5% 19.8% 2.3% 1.3% 100.0%8.4% 6.9% 3.9% .5% .3% 19.9%

2.5 .7 -3.0 -.6 -1.241 79 83 6 7 216

19.0% 36.6% 38.4% 2.8% 3.2% 100.0%2.1% 4.0% 4.2% .3% .4% 10.9%

-3.9 1.0 2.9 .0 1.142 56 38 3 6 145

29.0% 38.6% 26.2% 2.1% 4.1% 100.0%2.1% 2.8% 1.9% .2% .3% 7.3%

-1.2 1.3 -.4 -.5 1.6


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life


VeryDissatisfied

topregis

Total

D 99

Table 71. Registration procedures (drop/add, closed courses) -- Crosstabulation by College

161 119 139 9 8 43636.9% 27.3% 31.9% 2.1% 1.8% 100.0%

8.2% 6.0% 7.0% .5% .4% 22.1%.8 -1.9 1.6 -.9 -.5

13 13 11 1 2 4032.5% 32.5% 27.5% 2.5% 5.0% 100.0%

.7% .7% .6% .1% .1% 2.0%-.2 .0 .0 -.1 1.228 30 33 4 2 97

28.9% 30.9% 34.0% 4.1% 2.1% 100.0%1.4% 1.5% 1.7% .2% .1% 4.9%

-1.0 -.3 1.1 .8 -.131 17 13 1 0 62

50.0% 27.4% 21.0% 1.6% .0% 100.0%1.6% .9% .7% .1% .0% 3.1%

2.1 -.7 -1.0 -.6 -1.2684 642 551 55 43 1975

34.6% 32.5% 27.9% 2.8% 2.2% 100.0%34.6% 32.5% 27.9% 2.8% 2.2% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Dissatisfied

topregis

Total

Table 72. Academic probation -- Crosstabulation by College

19 16 52 2 7 9619.8% 16.7% 54.2% 2.1% 7.3% 100.0%

1.3% 1.1% 3.7% .1% .5% 6.8%.6 .3 -.8 .1 .8

54 52 188 4 16 31417.2% 16.6% 59.9% 1.3% 5.1% 100.0%

3.8% 3.7% 13.2% .3% 1.1% 22.1%.0 .5 -.1 -.8 -.2


Agriculture

Business


VeryDissatisfied

topprob

Total

D 100

Table 72. Academic probation -- Crosstabulation by College

39 28 170 5 14 25615.2% 10.9% 66.4% 2.0% 5.5% 100.0%

2.7% 2.0% 12.0% .4% 1.0% 18.0%-.7 -1.9 1.3 .1 .115 35 103 6 8 167

9.0% 21.0% 61.7% 3.6% 4.8% 100.0%1.1% 2.5% 7.3% .4% .6% 11.8%

-2.5 1.8 .3 1.6 -.310 14 60 2 8 94

10.6% 14.9% 63.8% 2.1% 8.5% 100.0%.7% 1.0% 4.2% .1% .6% 6.6%-1.5 -.1 .5 .2 1.3

69 50 195 6 16 33620.5% 14.9% 58.0% 1.8% 4.8% 100.0%

4.9% 3.5% 13.7% .4% 1.1% 23.7%1.5 -.3 -.5 -.2 -.5

6 5 21 1 4 3716.2% 13.5% 56.8% 2.7% 10.8% 100.0%

.4% .4% 1.5% .1% .3% 2.6%-.1 -.3 -.3 .4 1.411 11 44 1 3 70

15.7% 15.7% 62.9% 1.4% 4.3% 100.0%.8% .8% 3.1% .1% .2% 4.9%

-.3 .0 .3 -.3 -.420 9 21 0 0 50

40.0% 18.0% 42.0% .0% .0% 100.0%1.4% .6% 1.5% .0% .0% 3.5%

3.9 .5 -1.7 -1.0 -1.6243 220 854 27 76 1420

17.1% 15.5% 60.1% 1.9% 5.4% 100.0%17.1% 15.5% 60.1% 1.9% 5.4% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Dissatisfied

topprob

Total

D 101

Table 73. Career choice -- Crosstabulation by College

38 32 44 6 5 12530.4% 25.6% 35.2% 4.8% 4.0% 100.0%

2.2% 1.8% 2.5% .3% .3% 7.2%.6 -.4 -.1 -.4 .1

84 100 148 24 16 37222.6% 26.9% 39.8% 6.5% 4.3% 100.0%

4.8% 5.8% 8.5% 1.4% .9% 21.4%-1.8 -.2 1.4 .6 .4100 91 85 15 13 304

32.9% 29.9% 28.0% 4.9% 4.3% 100.0%5.8% 5.2% 4.9% .9% .7% 17.5%

1.8 .8 -2.2 -.6 .431 47 87 14 9 188

16.5% 25.0% 46.3% 7.4% 4.8% 100.0%1.8% 2.7% 5.0% .8% .5% 10.8%

-2.9 -.6 2.5 1.0 .622 32 51 7 6 118

18.6% 27.1% 43.2% 5.9% 5.1% 100.0%1.3% 1.8% 2.9% .4% .3% 6.8%

-1.8 -.1 1.4 .1 .7138 113 153 19 11 434

31.8% 26.0% 35.3% 4.4% 2.5% 100.0%7.9% 6.5% 8.8% 1.1% .6% 25.0%

1.7 -.5 -.1 -1.2 -1.414 17 10 1 1 43

32.6% 39.5% 23.3% 2.3% 2.3% 100.0%.8% 1.0% .6% .1% .1% 2.5%

.6 1.5 -1.4 -.9 -.522 25 30 13 6 96

22.9% 26.0% 31.3% 13.5% 6.3% 100.0%1.3% 1.4% 1.7% .7% .3% 5.5%

-.8 -.3 -.7 3.2 1.2


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science


VeryDissatisfied

topcaree

Total

D 102

Table 73. Career choice -- Crosstabulation by College

27 19 10 1 0 5747.4% 33.3% 17.5% 1.8% .0% 100.0%

1.6% 1.1% .6% .1% .0% 3.3%2.9 .9 -2.3 -1.3 -1.5

476 476 618 100 67 173727.4% 27.4% 35.6% 5.8% 3.9% 100.0%27.4% 27.4% 35.6% 5.8% 3.9% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total


Dissatisfied

topcaree

Total

Table 74. Internships -- Crosstabulation by College

59 42 34 6 7 14839.9% 28.4% 23.0% 4.1% 4.7% 100.0%

3.3% 2.3% 1.9% .3% .4% 8.3%3.2 .7 -2.8 -1.1 -.199 99 151 29 15 393

25.2% 25.2% 38.4% 7.4% 3.8% 100.0%5.5% 5.5% 8.4% 1.6% .8% 21.9%

-.4 -.2 .5 .8 -1.072 68 126 17 16 299

24.1% 22.7% 42.1% 5.7% 5.4% 100.0%4.0% 3.8% 7.0% .9% .9% 16.7%

-.7 -1.0 1.5 -.5 .337 57 85 20 7 206

18.0% 27.7% 41.3% 9.7% 3.4% 100.0%2.1% 3.2% 4.7% 1.1% .4% 11.5%

-2.3 .6 1.0 1.9 -1.028 43 42 14 8 135

20.7% 31.9% 31.1% 10.4% 5.9% 100.0%1.6% 2.4% 2.3% .8% .4% 7.5%

-1.2 1.4 -1.1 1.8 .5


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life


VeryDissatisfied

topintern

Total

D 103

Table 74. Internships -- Crosstabulation by College

124 104 156 20 24 42829.0% 24.3% 36.4% 4.7% 5.6% 100.0%

6.9% 5.8% 8.7% 1.1% 1.3% 23.9%1.1 -.5 -.1 -1.4 .711 11 17 2 1 42

26.2% 26.2% 40.5% 4.8% 2.4% 100.0%.6% .6% .9% .1% .1% 2.3%

.0 .1 .4 -.4 -.715 23 34 7 10 89

16.9% 25.8% 38.2% 7.9% 11.2% 100.0%.8% 1.3% 1.9% .4% .6% 5.0%-1.7 .0 .2 .5 2.7

25 12 15 0 0 5248.1% 23.1% 28.8% .0% .0% 100.0%

1.4% .7% .8% .0% .0% 2.9%3.1 -.4 -.9 -1.8 -1.6

470 459 660 115 88 179226.2% 25.6% 36.8% 6.4% 4.9% 100.0%26.2% 25.6% 36.8% 6.4% 4.9% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Dissatisfied

topintern

Total

Table 75. Research with faculty -- Crosstabulation by College

26 26 38 6 8 10425.0% 25.0% 36.5% 5.8% 7.7% 100.0%

1.8% 1.8% 2.6% .4% .5% 7.0%1.5 1.7 -1.9 -.5 .743 45 176 21 23 308

14.0% 14.6% 57.1% 6.8% 7.5% 100.0%2.9% 3.0% 11.9% 1.4% 1.6% 20.9%

-2.0 -1.4 1.8 -.2 1.1


Agriculture

Business


VeryDissatisfied

toprsch

Total

D 104

Table 75. Research with faculty -- Crosstabulation by College

48 45 132 22 14 26118.4% 17.2% 50.6% 8.4% 5.4% 100.0%

3.2% 3.0% 8.9% 1.5% .9% 17.7%-.2 -.3 .1 .8 -.421 34 88 18 10 171

12.3% 19.9% 51.5% 10.5% 5.8% 100.0%1.4% 2.3% 6.0% 1.2% .7% 11.6%

-2.0 .6 .3 1.7 -.19 21 56 6 6 98

9.2% 21.4% 57.1% 6.1% 6.1% 100.0%.6% 1.4% 3.8% .4% .4% 6.6%-2.2 .8 1.0 -.4 .1

82 54 177 16 20 34923.5% 15.5% 50.7% 4.6% 5.7% 100.0%

5.6% 3.7% 12.0% 1.1% 1.4% 23.6%2.0 -1.1 .2 -1.8 -.213 6 21 4 0 44

29.5% 13.6% 47.7% 9.1% .0% 100.0%.9% .4% 1.4% .3% .0% 3.0%1.6 -.7 -.2 .5 -1.616 24 36 11 7 94

17.0% 25.5% 38.3% 11.7% 7.4% 100.0%1.1% 1.6% 2.4% .7% .5% 6.4%

-.4 1.7 -1.6 1.7 .620 12 15 1 0 48

41.7% 25.0% 31.3% 2.1% .0% 100.0%1.4% .8% 1.0% .1% .0% 3.2%

3.6 1.1 -1.8 -1.3 -1.7278 267 739 105 88 1477

18.8% 18.1% 50.0% 7.1% 6.0% 100.0%18.8% 18.1% 50.0% 7.1% 6.0% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Dissatisfied

toprsch

Total

D 105

Table 76. How to get the most out of your educational experience at USU -- Crosstabulation by College

37 22 40 6 5 11033.6% 20.0% 36.4% 5.5% 4.5% 100.0%

2.3% 1.4% 2.5% .4% .3% 6.9%1.8 -.8 -.7 -.7 .366 80 154 32 13 345

19.1% 23.2% 44.6% 9.3% 3.8% 100.0%4.1% 5.0% 9.7% 2.0% .8% 21.6%

-2.2 -.1 1.3 1.4 -.284 74 107 15 11 291

28.9% 25.4% 36.8% 5.2% 3.8% 100.0%5.3% 4.6% 6.7% .9% .7% 18.2%

1.3 .7 -1.0 -1.3 -.124 38 93 12 10 177

13.6% 21.5% 52.5% 6.8% 5.6% 100.0%1.5% 2.4% 5.8% .8% .6% 11.1%

-3.0 -.6 2.6 -.2 1.118 27 44 12 5 106

17.0% 25.5% 41.5% 11.3% 4.7% 100.0%1.1% 1.7% 2.8% .8% .3% 6.6%

-1.6 .4 .2 1.6 .4116 92 144 22 13 387

30.0% 23.8% 37.2% 5.7% 3.4% 100.0%7.3% 5.8% 9.0% 1.4% .8% 24.3%

2.0 .1 -1.0 -1.1 -.613 10 12 6 0 41

31.7% 24.4% 29.3% 14.6% .0% 100.0%.8% .6% .8% .4% .0% 2.6%

.9 .1 -1.1 1.8 -1.318 18 35 10 6 87

20.7% 20.7% 40.2% 11.5% 6.9% 100.0%1.1% 1.1% 2.2% .6% .4% 5.5%

-.8 -.6 .0 1.5 1.4


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science


VeryDissatisfied

toprduc

Total

D 106

Table 76. How to get the most out of your educational experience at USU -- Crosstabulation by College

22 15 14 0 0 5143.1% 29.4% 27.5% .0% .0% 100.0%

1.4% .9% .9% .0% .0% 3.2%2.6 .9 -1.4 -1.9 -1.4

398 376 643 115 63 159525.0% 23.6% 40.3% 7.2% 3.9% 100.0%25.0% 23.6% 40.3% 7.2% 3.9% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total


Dissatisfied

toprduc

Total

Table 77. Study skills -- Crosstabulation by College

16 13 55 7 6 9716.5% 13.4% 56.7% 7.2% 6.2% 100.0%

1.1% .9% 3.8% .5% .4% 6.7%-.3 -1.1 .6 .2 .645 63 172 28 17 325

13.8% 19.4% 52.9% 8.6% 5.2% 100.0%3.1% 4.3% 11.8% 1.9% 1.2% 22.4%

-1.6 .5 .1 1.3 .340 45 137 14 15 251

15.9% 17.9% 54.6% 5.6% 6.0% 100.0%2.8% 3.1% 9.4% 1.0% 1.0% 17.3%

-.7 -.1 .5 -.7 .817 42 92 14 10 175

9.7% 24.0% 52.6% 8.0% 5.7% 100.0%1.2% 2.9% 6.3% 1.0% .7% 12.0%

-2.5 1.8 .0 .6 .511 13 54 9 7 94

11.7% 13.8% 57.4% 9.6% 7.4% 100.0%.8% .9% 3.7% .6% .5% 6.5%-1.4 -1.0 .7 1.1 1.2


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life


VeryDissatisfied

topstudy

Total

D 107

Table 77. Study skills -- Crosstabulation by College

92 64 176 13 10 35525.9% 18.0% 49.6% 3.7% 2.8% 100.0%

6.3% 4.4% 12.1% .9% .7% 24.4%3.7 -.1 -.7 -2.2 -1.7

8 2 18 4 1 3324.2% 6.1% 54.5% 12.1% 3.0% 100.0%

.6% .1% 1.2% .3% .1% 2.3%.9 -1.6 .2 1.2 -.59 13 41 6 4 73

12.3% 17.8% 56.2% 8.2% 5.5% 100.0%.6% .9% 2.8% .4% .3% 5.0%-1.1 -.1 .4 .5 .3

19 11 17 3 0 5038.0% 22.0% 34.0% 6.0% .0% 100.0%

1.3% .8% 1.2% .2% .0% 3.4%3.4 .6 -1.8 -.2 -1.6

257 266 762 98 70 145317.7% 18.3% 52.4% 6.7% 4.8% 100.0%17.7% 18.3% 52.4% 6.7% 4.8% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Dissatisfied

topstudy

Total

Table 78. Concerns about a specific course --Crosstabulation by College

50 42 36 2 5 13537.0% 31.1% 26.7% 1.5% 3.7% 100.0%

2.6% 2.2% 1.9% .1% .3% 7.1%1.0 -.4 -.2 -1.8 .7

124 119 129 25 13 41030.2% 29.0% 31.5% 6.1% 3.2% 100.0%

6.5% 6.2% 6.7% 1.3% .7% 21.4%-.6 -1.4 1.5 1.2 .6


Agriculture

Business


VeryDissatisfied

topspecc

Total

D 108

Table 78. Concerns about a specific course --Crosstabulation by College

134 111 86 16 5 35238.1% 31.5% 24.4% 4.5% 1.4% 100.0%

7.0% 5.8% 4.5% .8% .3% 18.4%2.0 -.5 -1.1 -.2 -1.448 82 68 13 7 218

22.0% 37.6% 31.2% 6.0% 3.2% 100.0%2.5% 4.3% 3.6% .7% .4% 11.4%

-2.6 1.2 1.0 .8 .530 45 37 8 7 127

23.6% 35.4% 29.1% 6.3% 5.5% 100.0%1.6% 2.4% 1.9% .4% .4% 6.6%

-1.7 .5 .4 .8 2.0160 153 112 20 11 456

35.1% 33.6% 24.6% 4.4% 2.4% 100.0%8.4% 8.0% 5.9% 1.0% .6% 23.8%

1.2 .2 -1.2 -.4 -.316 25 9 3 0 53

30.2% 47.2% 17.0% 5.7% .0% 100.0%.8% 1.3% .5% .2% .0% 2.8%

-.2 1.8 -1.5 .3 -1.223 38 34 5 3 103

22.3% 36.9% 33.0% 4.9% 2.9% 100.0%1.2% 2.0% 1.8% .3% .2% 5.4%

-1.7 .7 1.1 .0 .228 17 15 0 0 60

46.7% 28.3% 25.0% .0% .0% 100.0%1.5% .9% .8% .0% .0% 3.1%

2.0 -.6 -.4 -1.7 -1.3613 632 526 92 51 1914

32.0% 33.0% 27.5% 4.8% 2.7% 100.0%32.0% 33.0% 27.5% 4.8% 2.7% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Dissatisfied

topspecc

Total

D 109

Table 79. Concerns about a specific faculty member -- Crosstabulation by College

24 14 50 4 9 10123.8% 13.9% 49.5% 4.0% 8.9% 100.0%

1.6% 1.0% 3.4% .3% .6% 6.9%.7 -1.1 -.2 -.4 1.8

54 64 172 14 15 31916.9% 20.1% 53.9% 4.4% 4.7% 100.0%

3.7% 4.4% 11.7% 1.0% 1.0% 21.8%-1.5 .6 .8 -.4 -.2

51 43 134 16 13 25719.8% 16.7% 52.1% 6.2% 5.1% 100.0%

3.5% 2.9% 9.1% 1.1% .9% 17.5%-.3 -.7 .3 1.0 .124 43 91 12 6 176

13.6% 24.4% 51.7% 6.8% 3.4% 100.0%1.6% 2.9% 6.2% .8% .4% 12.0%

-2.1 1.8 .2 1.1 -.913 16 52 5 6 92

14.1% 17.4% 56.5% 5.4% 6.5% 100.0%.9% 1.1% 3.5% .3% .4% 6.3%-1.4 -.3 .8 .2 .7

97 70 154 17 21 35927.0% 19.5% 42.9% 4.7% 5.8% 100.0%

6.6% 4.8% 10.5% 1.2% 1.4% 24.5%2.6 .4 -2.1 -.2 .7

7 4 23 1 0 3520.0% 11.4% 65.7% 2.9% .0% 100.0%

.5% .3% 1.6% .1% .0% 2.4%-.1 -1.0 1.2 -.5 -1.312 13 47 3 3 78

15.4% 16.7% 60.3% 3.8% 3.8% 100.0%.8% .9% 3.2% .2% .2% 5.3%-1.0 -.4 1.2 -.4 -.4


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science


VeryDissatisfied

topspcf

Total

D 110

Table 79. Concerns about a specific faculty member -- Crosstabulation by College

22 6 21 0 0 4944.9% 12.2% 42.9% .0% .0% 100.0%

1.5% .4% 1.4% .0% .0% 3.3%3.7 -1.0 -.8 -1.6 -1.6

304 273 744 72 73 146620.7% 18.6% 50.8% 4.9% 5.0% 100.0%20.7% 18.6% 50.8% 4.9% 5.0% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total


Dissatisfied

topspcf

Total

Table 80. Application to graduate/professional schools -- Crosstabulation by College

33 19 51 7 5 11528.7% 16.5% 44.3% 6.1% 4.3% 100.0%

1.9% 1.1% 3.0% .4% .3% 6.7%.2 -1.7 1.2 -.1 .1

87 106 154 19 21 38722.5% 27.4% 39.8% 4.9% 5.4% 100.0%

5.1% 6.2% 9.0% 1.1% 1.2% 22.6%-1.9 1.1 .8 -1.1 1.2126 82 94 25 7 334

37.7% 24.6% 28.1% 7.5% 2.1% 100.0%7.3% 4.8% 5.5% 1.5% .4% 19.5%

3.5 .0 -2.8 .8 -1.932 47 84 17 9 189

16.9% 24.9% 44.4% 9.0% 4.8% 100.0%1.9% 2.7% 4.9% 1.0% .5% 11.0%

-2.8 .1 1.6 1.4 .420 29 39 9 8 105

19.0% 27.6% 37.1% 8.6% 7.6% 100.0%1.2% 1.7% 2.3% .5% .5% 6.1%

-1.7 .6 .0 .9 1.7


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life


VeryDissatisfied

topappli

Total

D 111

Table 80. Application to graduate/professional schools -- Crosstabulation by College

120 96 148 19 15 39830.2% 24.1% 37.2% 4.8% 3.8% 100.0%

7.0% 5.6% 8.6% 1.1% .9% 23.2%1.0 -.2 -.1 -1.2 -.414 8 20 4 1 47

29.8% 17.0% 42.6% 8.5% 2.1% 100.0%.8% .5% 1.2% .2% .1% 2.7%

.3 -1.0 .6 .6 -.720 22 34 9 6 91

22.0% 24.2% 37.4% 9.9% 6.6% 100.0%1.2% 1.3% 2.0% .5% .3% 5.3%

-1.0 -.1 .0 1.3 1.121 12 17 0 0 50

42.0% 24.0% 34.0% .0% .0% 100.0%1.2% .7% 1.0% .0% .0% 2.9%

1.9 -.1 -.4 -1.8 -1.4473 421 641 109 72 1716

27.6% 24.5% 37.4% 6.4% 4.2% 100.0%27.6% 24.5% 37.4% 6.4% 4.2% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Dissatisfied

topappli

Total

Table 81. Personal problems -- Crosstabulation by College

27 13 50 5 7 10226.5% 12.7% 49.0% 4.9% 6.9% 100.0%

1.9% .9% 3.5% .3% .5% 7.1%1.6 -.5 -.9 .2 .644 45 189 14 16 308

14.3% 14.6% 61.4% 4.5% 5.2% 100.0%3.1% 3.1% 13.2% 1.0% 1.1% 21.5%

-2.1 .1 1.2 .1 -.2


Agriculture

Business


VeryDissatisfied

topprobs

Total

D 112

Table 81. Personal problems -- Crosstabulation by College

60 34 142 9 15 26023.1% 13.1% 54.6% 3.5% 5.8% 100.0%

4.2% 2.4% 9.9% .6% 1.0% 18.1%1.3 -.6 -.3 -.8 .215 20 106 10 8 159

9.4% 12.6% 66.7% 6.3% 5.0% 100.0%1.0% 1.4% 7.4% .7% .6% 11.1%

-2.9 -.6 1.8 1.1 -.213 12 61 7 8 101

12.9% 11.9% 60.4% 6.9% 7.9% 100.0%.9% .8% 4.3% .5% .6% 7.0%-1.5 -.7 .6 1.2 1.1

87 58 170 12 17 34425.3% 16.9% 49.4% 3.5% 4.9% 100.0%

6.1% 4.0% 11.9% .8% 1.2% 24.0%2.4 1.2 -1.6 -.9 -.4

6 7 21 3 2 3915.4% 17.9% 53.8% 7.7% 5.1% 100.0%

.4% .5% 1.5% .2% .1% 2.7%-.6 .6 -.2 1.0 -.112 11 43 2 5 73

16.4% 15.1% 58.9% 2.7% 6.8% 100.0%.8% .8% 3.0% .1% .3% 5.1%

-.6 .1 .3 -.7 .517 7 21 2 0 47

36.2% 14.9% 44.7% 4.3% .0% 100.0%1.2% .5% 1.5% .1% .0% 3.3%

2.6 .1 -1.0 -.1 -1.6281 207 803 64 78 1433

19.6% 14.4% 56.0% 4.5% 5.4% 100.0%19.6% 14.4% 56.0% 4.5% 5.4% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Dissatisfied

topprobs

Total

D 113

Table 82. Credit by examination (CLEP) -- Crosstabulation by College

21 13 54 5 8 10120.8% 12.9% 53.5% 5.0% 7.9% 100.0%

1.5% .9% 3.9% .4% .6% 7.3%1.1 -.8 -.5 -.2 1.441 52 182 14 17 306

13.4% 17.0% 59.5% 4.6% 5.6% 100.0%3.0% 3.8% 13.2% 1.0% 1.2% 22.2%

-1.3 .5 .4 -.7 .633 39 137 13 12 234

14.1% 16.7% 58.5% 5.6% 5.1% 100.0%2.4% 2.8% 10.0% .9% .9% 17.0%

-.9 .3 .2 .1 .217 34 98 17 7 173

9.8% 19.7% 56.6% 9.8% 4.0% 100.0%1.2% 2.5% 7.1% 1.2% .5% 12.6%

-2.1 1.3 -.2 2.5 -.59 9 60 5 5 88

10.2% 10.2% 68.2% 5.7% 5.7% 100.0%.7% .7% 4.4% .4% .4% 6.4%-1.4 -1.3 1.3 .1 .4

70 48 177 14 13 32221.7% 14.9% 55.0% 4.3% 4.0% 100.0%

5.1% 3.5% 12.9% 1.0% .9% 23.4%2.4 -.4 -.6 -.8 -.6

5 2 22 3 2 3414.7% 5.9% 64.7% 8.8% 5.9% 100.0%

.4% .1% 1.6% .2% .1% 2.5%-.2 -1.5 .5 .8 .3

8 12 43 4 2 6911.6% 17.4% 62.3% 5.8% 2.9% 100.0%

.6% .9% 3.1% .3% .1% 5.0%-1.0 .3 .5 .1 -.7


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science


VeryDissatisfied

topclep

Total

D 114

Table 82. Credit by examination (CLEP) -- Crosstabulation by College

21 9 19 0 0 4942.9% 18.4% 38.8% .0% .0% 100.0%

1.5% .7% 1.4% .0% .0% 3.6%4.6 .4 -1.7 -1.6 -1.5

225 218 792 75 66 137616.4% 15.8% 57.6% 5.5% 4.8% 100.0%16.4% 15.8% 57.6% 5.5% 4.8% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total


Dissatisfied

topclep

Total

Table 83. Advanced Placement (AP) courses -- Crosstabulation by College

16 15 58 2 7 9816.3% 15.3% 59.2% 2.0% 7.1% 100.0%

1.1% 1.0% 4.0% .1% .5% 6.8%-.3 -.7 .4 -1.1 1.544 62 183 14 16 319

13.8% 19.4% 57.4% 4.4% 5.0% 100.0%3.1% 4.3% 12.7% 1.0% 1.1% 22.1%

-1.6 .5 .3 .1 .948 44 145 10 12 259

18.5% 17.0% 56.0% 3.9% 4.6% 100.0%3.3% 3.1% 10.1% .7% .8% 18.0%

.4 -.4 .0 -.3 .520 45 101 9 4 179

11.2% 25.1% 56.4% 5.0% 2.2% 100.0%1.4% 3.1% 7.0% .6% .3% 12.4%

-2.1 2.2 .1 .5 -1.213 14 57 6 3 93

14.0% 15.1% 61.3% 6.5% 3.2% 100.0%.9% 1.0% 4.0% .4% .2% 6.4%

-.8 -.7 .7 1.0 -.4


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life


VeryDissatisfied

topap

Total

D 115

Table 83. Advanced Placement (AP) courses -- Crosstabulation by College

73 46 186 11 13 32922.2% 14.0% 56.5% 3.3% 4.0% 100.0%

5.1% 3.2% 12.9% .8% .9% 22.8%2.0 -1.8 .1 -.8 -.1

6 6 18 3 1 3417.6% 17.6% 52.9% 8.8% 2.9% 100.0%

.4% .4% 1.2% .2% .1% 2.4%.0 -.1 -.2 1.3 -.3

14 21 38 6 2 8117.3% 25.9% 46.9% 7.4% 2.5% 100.0%

1.0% 1.5% 2.6% .4% .1% 5.6%-.1 1.6 -1.1 1.4 -.720 9 21 0 0 50

40.0% 18.0% 42.0% .0% .0% 100.0%1.4% .6% 1.5% .0% .0% 3.5%

3.8 .0 -1.3 -1.5 -1.4254 262 807 61 58 1442

17.6% 18.2% 56.0% 4.2% 4.0% 100.0%17.6% 18.2% 56.0% 4.2% 4.0% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Dissatisfied

topap

Total

Table 84. Work study/on-campus employment -- Crosstabulation by College

16 17 48 7 8 9616.7% 17.7% 50.0% 7.3% 8.3% 100.0%

1.2% 1.3% 3.5% .5% .6% 7.1%.1 .9 -1.1 .8 1.3

40 51 190 10 17 30813.0% 16.6% 61.7% 3.2% 5.5% 100.0%

2.9% 3.8% 14.0% .7% 1.3% 22.7%-1.4 1.0 .7 -1.6 .2


Agriculture

Business


VeryDissatisfied

topwork

Total

D 116

Table 84. Work study/on-campus employment -- Crosstabulation by College

31 26 147 9 15 22813.6% 11.4% 64.5% 3.9% 6.6% 100.0%

2.3% 1.9% 10.8% .7% 1.1% 16.8%-1.0 -1.2 1.1 -.9 .8

16 24 94 17 8 15910.1% 15.1% 59.1% 10.7% 5.0% 100.0%

1.2% 1.8% 6.9% 1.3% .6% 11.7%-1.9 .2 .1 3.0 -.1

7 11 53 7 5 838.4% 13.3% 63.9% 8.4% 6.0% 100.0%

.5% .8% 3.9% .5% .4% 6.1%-1.8 -.3 .6 1.2 .3

74 46 181 10 18 32922.5% 14.0% 55.0% 3.0% 5.5% 100.0%

5.4% 3.4% 13.3% .7% 1.3% 24.2%2.8 -.2 -.9 -1.8 .110 6 18 3 0 37

27.0% 16.2% 48.6% 8.1% .0% 100.0%.7% .4% 1.3% .2% .0% 2.7%1.6 .3 -.8 .7 -1.410 9 43 8 1 71

14.1% 12.7% 60.6% 11.3% 1.4% 100.0%.7% .7% 3.2% .6% .1% 5.2%

-.5 -.4 .2 2.2 -1.417 5 25 1 0 48

35.4% 10.4% 52.1% 2.1% .0% 100.0%1.3% .4% 1.8% .1% .0% 3.5%

3.3 -.7 -.6 -1.0 -1.6221 195 799 72 72 1359

16.3% 14.3% 58.8% 5.3% 5.3% 100.0%16.3% 14.3% 58.8% 5.3% 5.3% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Dissatisfied

topwork

Total

D 117

Table 85. Job placement after graduation -- Crosstabulation by College

16 23 46 11 10 10615.1% 21.7% 43.4% 10.4% 9.4% 100.0%

1.1% 1.6% 3.1% .8% .7% 7.2%-.8 1.0 -.8 .5 1.345 58 169 26 21 319

14.1% 18.2% 53.0% 8.2% 6.6% 100.0%3.1% 4.0% 11.5% 1.8% 1.4% 21.8%

-1.8 .3 1.0 -.4 .350 42 134 12 13 251

19.9% 16.7% 53.4% 4.8% 5.2% 100.0%3.4% 2.9% 9.2% .8% .9% 17.1%

.5 -.3 1.0 -2.2 -.714 29 91 19 8 161

8.7% 18.0% 56.5% 11.8% 5.0% 100.0%1.0% 2.0% 6.2% 1.3% .5% 11.0%

-2.9 .2 1.4 1.3 -.617 11 48 17 8 101

16.8% 10.9% 47.5% 16.8% 7.9% 100.0%1.2% .8% 3.3% 1.2% .5% 6.9%

-.4 -1.6 -.2 2.7 .786 60 162 28 22 358

24.0% 16.8% 45.3% 7.8% 6.1% 100.0%5.9% 4.1% 11.1% 1.9% 1.5% 24.5%

2.5 -.3 -1.0 -.6 -.110 7 14 7 3 41

24.4% 17.1% 34.1% 17.1% 7.3% 100.0%.7% .5% 1.0% .5% .2% 2.8%

.9 -.1 -1.4 1.8 .314 19 32 8 6 79

17.7% 24.1% 40.5% 10.1% 7.6% 100.0%1.0% 1.3% 2.2% .5% .4% 5.4%

-.1 1.4 -1.1 .4 .5


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science


VeryDissatisfied

topjob

Total

D 118

Table 85. Job placement after graduation -- Crosstabulation by College

18 7 22 1 0 4837.5% 14.6% 45.8% 2.1% .0% 100.0%

1.2% .5% 1.5% .1% .0% 3.3%3.1 -.5 -.3 -1.6 -1.7

270 256 718 129 91 146418.4% 17.5% 49.0% 8.8% 6.2% 100.0%18.4% 17.5% 49.0% 8.8% 6.2% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total


Dissatisfied

topjob

Total

Table 86. Withdrawing from USU -- Crosstabulation by College

8 6 59 2 9 849.5% 7.1% 70.2% 2.4% 10.7% 100.0%

.6% .5% 4.7% .2% .7% 6.7%-.8 -.9 .2 -.2 2.032 44 193 6 17 292

11.0% 15.1% 66.1% 2.1% 5.8% 100.0%2.5% 3.5% 15.3% .5% 1.4% 23.2%

-.8 2.6 -.6 -.7 .126 17 158 5 13 219

11.9% 7.8% 72.1% 2.3% 5.9% 100.0%2.1% 1.4% 12.5% .4% 1.0% 17.4%

-.3 -1.1 .6 -.4 .29 14 111 6 7 147

6.1% 9.5% 75.5% 4.1% 4.8% 100.0%.7% 1.1% 8.8% .5% .6% 11.7%-2.2 -.2 1.0 1.0 -.4

6 6 55 6 6 797.6% 7.6% 69.6% 7.6% 7.6% 100.0%

.5% .5% 4.4% .5% .5% 6.3%-1.3 -.7 .1 2.6 .7


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life


VeryDissatisfied

topwithd

Total

D 119

Table 86. Withdrawing from USU -- Crosstabulation by College

54 28 201 4 14 30117.9% 9.3% 66.8% 1.3% 4.7% 100.0%

4.3% 2.2% 16.0% .3% 1.1% 23.9%2.5 -.5 -.4 -1.4 -.7

5 2 21 2 2 3215.6% 6.3% 65.6% 6.3% 6.3% 100.0%

.4% .2% 1.7% .2% .2% 2.5%.5 -.7 -.2 1.2 .15 7 45 2 2 61

8.2% 11.5% 73.8% 3.3% 3.3% 100.0%.4% .6% 3.6% .2% .2% 4.8%-1.0 .3 .5 .3 -.8

15 4 23 1 1 4434.1% 9.1% 52.3% 2.3% 2.3% 100.0%

1.2% .3% 1.8% .1% .1% 3.5%4.0 -.2 -1.3 -.2 -.9

160 128 866 34 71 125912.7% 10.2% 68.8% 2.7% 5.6% 100.0%12.7% 10.2% 68.8% 2.7% 5.6% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Dissatisfied

topwithd

Total

Table 87. Overall quality of education -- Crosstabulation by College

56 92 16 6 0 17032.9% 54.1% 9.4% 3.5% .0% 100.0%

2.1% 3.5% .6% .2% .0% 6.5%1.0 -.4 -.7 .3 -.7

129 345 77 16 3 57022.6% 60.5% 13.5% 2.8% .5% 100.0%

4.9% 13.2% 2.9% .6% .1% 21.7%-2.7 1.3 1.6 -.5 1.2


Agriculture

Business


VeryDissatisfied

overaledu

Total

D 120

Table 87. Overall quality of education -- Crosstabulation by College

205 254 40 8 1 50840.4% 50.0% 7.9% 1.6% .2% 100.0%

7.8% 9.7% 1.5% .3% .0% 19.4%4.9 -2.0 -2.3 -2.0 -.368 176 37 12 0 293

23.2% 60.1% 12.6% 4.1% .0% 100.0%2.6% 6.7% 1.4% .5% .0% 11.2%

-1.8 .8 .7 .9 -.952 112 16 5 0 185

28.1% 60.5% 8.6% 2.7% .0% 100.0%2.0% 4.3% .6% .2% .0% 7.1%

-.2 .7 -1.1 -.4 -.7166 326 83 21 3 599

27.7% 54.4% 13.9% 3.5% .5% 100.0%6.3% 12.4% 3.2% .8% .1% 22.9%

-.5 -.7 1.9 .5 1.116 32 8 5 0 61

26.2% 52.5% 13.1% 8.2% .0% 100.0%.6% 1.2% .3% .2% .0% 2.3%

-.4 -.4 .4 2.2 -.436 104 13 8 0 161

22.4% 64.6% 8.1% 5.0% .0% 100.0%1.4% 4.0% .5% .3% .0% 6.1%

-1.5 1.4 -1.2 1.3 -.726 41 5 2 0 74

35.1% 55.4% 6.8% 2.7% .0% 100.0%1.0% 1.6% .2% .1% .0% 2.8%

1.0 -.1 -1.2 -.2 -.4754 1482 295 83 7 2621

28.8% 56.5% 11.3% 3.2% .3% 100.0%28.8% 56.5% 11.3% 3.2% .3% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Dissatisfied

overaledu

Total

D 121

Table 88. Overall quality of the program in your major -- Crosstabulation by College

66 82 14 8 0 17038.8% 48.2% 8.2% 4.7% .0% 100.0%

2.5% 3.1% .5% .3% .0% 6.5%.6 .3 -1.5 .5 -1.2

150 304 89 21 3 56726.5% 53.6% 15.7% 3.7% .5% 100.0%

5.7% 11.6% 3.4% .8% .1% 21.7%-3.8 2.4 2.2 -.4 -.7263 191 38 16 1 509

51.7% 37.5% 7.5% 3.1% .2% 100.0%10.0% 7.3% 1.5% .6% .0% 19.4%

5.9 -3.1 -3.2 -1.0 -1.576 164 43 11 0 294

25.9% 55.8% 14.6% 3.7% .0% 100.0%2.9% 6.3% 1.6% .4% .0% 11.2%

-2.9 2.3 1.1 -.2 -1.562 88 22 12 1 185

33.5% 47.6% 11.9% 6.5% .5% 100.0%2.4% 3.4% .8% .5% .0% 7.1%

-.6 .2 -.2 1.7 -.4233 240 84 30 12 599

38.9% 40.1% 14.0% 5.0% 2.0% 100.0%8.9% 9.2% 3.2% 1.1% .5% 22.9%

1.2 -2.4 1.1 1.2 3.322 32 3 3 1 61

36.1% 52.5% 4.9% 4.9% 1.6% 100.0%.8% 1.2% .1% .1% .0% 2.3%

.0 .6 -1.7 .4 .744 85 24 4 3 160

27.5% 53.1% 15.0% 2.5% 1.9% 100.0%1.7% 3.2% .9% .2% .1% 6.1%

-1.8 1.2 .9 -1.0 1.5


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science


VeryDissatisfied

overmajo

Total

D 122

Table 88. Overall quality of the program in your major -- Crosstabulation by College

26 39 8 0 0 7335.6% 53.4% 11.0% .0% .0% 100.0%

1.0% 1.5% .3% .0% .0% 2.8%-.1 .8 -.4 -1.7 -.8

942 1225 325 105 21 261836.0% 46.8% 12.4% 4.0% .8% 100.0%36.0% 46.8% 12.4% 4.0% .8% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total


Dissatisfied

overmajo

Total

Table 89. Variety of courses in your major -- Crosstabualtion by College

58 78 24 10 0 17034.1% 45.9% 14.1% 5.9% .0% 100.0%

2.2% 3.0% .9% .4% .0% 6.5%1.4 .3 -1.0 -1.2 -1.4

122 268 113 54 10 56721.5% 47.3% 19.9% 9.5% 1.8% 100.0%

4.7% 10.2% 4.3% 2.1% .4% 21.7%-3.1 1.1 1.5 .7 1.3199 214 65 28 2 508

39.2% 42.1% 12.8% 5.5% .4% 100.0%7.6% 8.2% 2.5% 1.1% .1% 19.4%

4.5 -.7 -2.4 -2.4 -1.658 142 59 30 5 294

19.7% 48.3% 20.1% 10.2% 1.7% 100.0%2.2% 5.4% 2.3% 1.1% .2% 11.2%

-2.8 1.0 1.1 .9 .859 76 31 17 1 184

32.1% 41.3% 16.8% 9.2% .5% 100.0%2.3% 2.9% 1.2% .6% .0% 7.0%

.9 -.6 -.2 .3 -.8


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life


VeryDissatisfied

varcours

Total

D 123

Table 89. Variety of courses in your major -- Crosstabualtion by College

176 245 107 61 10 59929.4% 40.9% 17.9% 10.2% 1.7% 100.0%

6.7% 9.4% 4.1% 2.3% .4% 22.9%.4 -1.3 .3 1.3 1.1

16 32 5 6 2 6126.2% 52.5% 8.2% 9.8% 3.3% 100.0%

.6% 1.2% .2% .2% .1% 2.3%-.3 1.0 -1.7 .3 1.530 74 39 17 1 161

18.6% 46.0% 24.2% 10.6% .6% 100.0%1.1% 2.8% 1.5% .6% .0% 6.2%

-2.3 .3 2.1 .8 -.728 31 10 4 0 73

38.4% 42.5% 13.7% 5.5% .0% 100.0%1.1% 1.2% .4% .2% .0% 2.8%

1.6 -.2 -.7 -.9 -.9746 1160 453 227 31 2617

28.5% 44.3% 17.3% 8.7% 1.2% 100.0%28.5% 44.3% 17.3% 8.7% 1.2% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Dissatisfied

varcours

Total

Table 90. Challenge of courses in your major -- Crosstabulation by College

63 78 22 7 0 17037.1% 45.9% 12.9% 4.1% .0% 100.0%

2.4% 3.0% .8% .3% .0% 6.5%.9 -.6 -.3 .2 -.9

145 299 100 18 5 56725.6% 52.7% 17.6% 3.2% .9% 100.0%

5.5% 11.4% 3.8% .7% .2% 21.7%-3.1 1.3 2.5 -.7 1.3


Agriculture

Business


VeryDissatisfied

challmaj

Total

D 124

Table 90. Challenge of courses in your major -- Crosstabulation by College

212 225 57 14 0 50841.7% 44.3% 11.2% 2.8% .0% 100.0%

8.1% 8.6% 2.2% .5% .0% 19.4%3.4 -1.5 -1.6 -1.2 -1.685 160 44 5 0 294

28.9% 54.4% 15.0% 1.7% .0% 100.0%3.3% 6.1% 1.7% .2% .0% 11.2%

-1.2 1.4 .5 -1.8 -1.260 87 23 13 1 184

32.6% 47.3% 12.5% 7.1% .5% 100.0%2.3% 3.3% .9% .5% .0% 7.0%

-.1 -.3 -.5 2.3 .1205 281 82 27 4 599

34.2% 46.9% 13.7% 4.5% .7% 100.0%7.8% 10.7% 3.1% 1.0% .2% 22.9%

.5 -.7 -.1 1.0 .617 38 2 3 1 61

27.9% 62.3% 3.3% 4.9% 1.6% 100.0%.7% 1.5% .1% .1% .0% 2.3%

-.7 1.5 -2.2 .5 1.351 73 24 10 1 159

32.1% 45.9% 15.1% 6.3% .6% 100.0%2.0% 2.8% .9% .4% .0% 6.1%

-.2 -.5 .4 1.7 .227 36 7 1 1 72

37.5% 50.0% 9.7% 1.4% 1.4% 100.0%1.0% 1.4% .3% .0% .0% 2.8%

.7 .1 -.9 -1.0 1.1865 1277 361 98 13 2614

33.1% 48.9% 13.8% 3.7% .5% 100.0%33.1% 48.9% 13.8% 3.7% .5% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Dissatisfied

challmaj

Total

D 125

Table 91. Accessibility of faculty -- Crosstabulation by College

71 70 23 5 0 16942.0% 41.4% 13.6% 3.0% .0% 100.0%

2.7% 2.7% .9% .2% .0% 6.5%2.9 -.7 -1.7 -1.0 -1.0

139 260 134 29 2 56424.6% 46.1% 23.8% 5.1% .4% 100.0%

5.3% 10.0% 5.1% 1.1% .1% 21.6%-2.3 .3 2.3 .5 -.9196 215 79 14 2 506

38.7% 42.5% 15.6% 2.8% .4% 100.0%7.5% 8.2% 3.0% .5% .1% 19.4%

3.6 -.9 -2.0 -2.0 -.760 149 66 17 1 293

20.5% 50.9% 22.5% 5.8% .3% 100.0%2.3% 5.7% 2.5% .7% .0% 11.2%

-3.0 1.4 1.2 .9 -.746 86 44 7 1 184

25.0% 46.7% 23.9% 3.8% .5% 100.0%1.8% 3.3% 1.7% .3% .0% 7.0%

-1.2 .3 1.4 -.5 -.2194 269 103 29 6 601

32.3% 44.8% 17.1% 4.8% 1.0% 100.0%7.4% 10.3% 3.9% 1.1% .2% 23.0%

1.0 -.2 -1.3 .2 1.117 30 9 5 0 61

27.9% 49.2% 14.8% 8.2% .0% 100.0%.7% 1.1% .3% .2% .0% 2.3%

-.3 .5 -.8 1.3 -.631 78 34 13 4 160

19.4% 48.8% 21.3% 8.1% 2.5% 100.0%1.2% 3.0% 1.3% .5% .2% 6.1%

-2.4 .7 .5 2.0 2.9


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science


VeryDissatisfied

accesfac

Total

D 126

Table 91. Accessibility of faculty -- Crosstabulation by College

28 26 16 3 1 7437.8% 35.1% 21.6% 4.1% 1.4% 100.0%

1.1% 1.0% .6% .1% .0% 2.8%1.2 -1.3 .4 -.2 .7

782 1183 508 122 17 261229.9% 45.3% 19.4% 4.7% .7% 100.0%29.9% 45.3% 19.4% 4.7% .7% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total


Dissatisfied

accesfac

Total

Table 92. Helpfulness of faculty -- Crosstabulation by College

77 63 20 7 0 16746.1% 37.7% 12.0% 4.2% .0% 100.0%

3.0% 2.4% .8% .3% .0% 6.4%2.9 -1.3 -1.6 -.1 -1.2

150 261 116 33 4 56426.6% 46.3% 20.6% 5.9% .7% 100.0%

5.8% 10.0% 4.4% 1.3% .2% 21.6%-2.7 .6 2.1 1.6 -.3215 219 62 11 0 507

42.4% 43.2% 12.2% 2.2% .0% 100.0%8.2% 8.4% 2.4% .4% .0% 19.4%

3.6 -.5 -2.6 -2.4 -2.060 152 64 14 2 292

20.5% 52.1% 21.9% 4.8% .7% 100.0%2.3% 5.8% 2.5% .5% .1% 11.2%

-3.8 1.9 2.1 .3 -.258 82 38 5 1 184

31.5% 44.6% 20.7% 2.7% .5% 100.0%2.2% 3.1% 1.5% .2% .0% 7.1%

-.4 .0 1.2 -1.1 -.4


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life


VeryDissatisfied

helpfac

Total

D 127

Table 92. Helpfulness of faculty -- Crosstabulation by College

220 255 94 20 9 59836.8% 42.6% 15.7% 3.3% 1.5% 100.0%

8.4% 9.8% 3.6% .8% .3% 22.9%1.5 -.7 -.7 -1.2 1.918 29 8 5 1 61

29.5% 47.5% 13.1% 8.2% 1.6% 100.0%.7% 1.1% .3% .2% .0% 2.3%

-.5 .3 -.7 1.4 .738 72 28 18 4 160

23.8% 45.0% 17.5% 11.3% 2.5% 100.0%1.5% 2.8% 1.1% .7% .2% 6.1%

-2.1 .1 .2 4.1 2.430 30 12 2 0 74

40.5% 40.5% 16.2% 2.7% .0% 100.0%1.2% 1.2% .5% .1% .0% 2.8%

1.1 -.5 -.2 -.7 -.8866 1163 442 115 21 2607

33.2% 44.6% 17.0% 4.4% .8% 100.0%33.2% 44.6% 17.0% 4.4% .8% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Dissatisfied

helpfac

Total

Table 93. The degree to which you were treated fairly -- Crosstabulation by College

81 70 12 5 1 16947.9% 41.4% 7.1% 3.0% .6% 100.0%

3.1% 2.7% .5% .2% .0% 6.5%2.8 -1.0 -2.4 -.2 -.3

168 282 98 15 3 56629.7% 49.8% 17.3% 2.7% .5% 100.0%

6.4% 10.8% 3.7% .6% .1% 21.6%-2.2 1.0 2.0 -.7 -.7


Agriculture

Business


VeryDissatisfied

treatedf

Total

D 128

Table 93. The degree to which you were treated fairly -- Crosstabulation by College

224 222 47 12 2 50744.2% 43.8% 9.3% 2.4% .4% 100.0%

8.6% 8.5% 1.8% .5% .1% 19.4%3.5 -1.0 -2.9 -1.0 -1.069 162 52 8 2 293

23.5% 55.3% 17.7% 2.7% .7% 100.0%2.6% 6.2% 2.0% .3% .1% 11.2%

-3.3 2.1 1.6 -.4 -.258 91 26 6 4 185

31.4% 49.2% 14.1% 3.2% 2.2% 100.0%2.2% 3.5% 1.0% .2% .2% 7.1%

-.9 .5 .0 .1 2.1219 266 89 20 6 600

36.5% 44.3% 14.8% 3.3% 1.0% 100.0%8.4% 10.2% 3.4% .8% .2% 22.9%

.6 -.9 .4 .2 .523 25 8 3 2 61

37.7% 41.0% 13.1% 4.9% 3.3% 100.0%.9% 1.0% .3% .1% .1% 2.3%

.3 -.7 -.2 .8 2.245 74 30 11 1 161

28.0% 46.0% 18.6% 6.8% .6% 100.0%1.7% 2.8% 1.1% .4% .0% 6.2%

-1.5 -.2 1.5 2.6 -.330 33 8 3 0 74

40.5% 44.6% 10.8% 4.1% .0% 100.0%1.1% 1.3% .3% .1% .0% 2.8%

.8 -.3 -.8 .4 -.8917 1225 370 83 21 2616

35.1% 46.8% 14.1% 3.2% .8% 100.0%35.1% 46.8% 14.1% 3.2% .8% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Dissatisfied

treatedf

Total

D 129

Table 94. Overall quality of University Studies/General Education courses -- Crosstabulation by College

16 46 33 12 6 11314.2% 40.7% 29.2% 10.6% 5.3% 100.0%

.8% 2.3% 1.6% .6% .3% 5.6%-.1 -.6 .2 .3 1.268 210 121 37 10 446

15.2% 47.1% 27.1% 8.3% 2.2% 100.0%3.4% 10.4% 6.0% 1.8% .5% 22.1%

.5 .8 -.5 -1.0 -1.165 150 106 26 9 356

18.3% 42.1% 29.8% 7.3% 2.5% 100.0%3.2% 7.4% 5.2% 1.3% .4% 17.6%

1.9 -.6 .5 -1.5 -.721 101 86 31 10 249

8.4% 40.6% 34.5% 12.4% 4.0% 100.0%1.0% 5.0% 4.3% 1.5% .5% 12.3%

-2.5 -.9 1.8 1.4 .719 71 32 15 2 139

13.7% 51.1% 23.0% 10.8% 1.4% 100.0%.9% 3.5% 1.6% .7% .1% 6.9%

-.2 1.2 -1.2 .4 -1.270 205 140 46 19 480

14.6% 42.7% 29.2% 9.6% 4.0% 100.0%3.5% 10.1% 6.9% 2.3% .9% 23.8%

.1 -.6 .3 -.1 .91 17 16 10 4 48

2.1% 35.4% 33.3% 20.8% 8.3% 100.0%.0% .8% .8% .5% .2% 2.4%-2.2 -.9 .7 2.5 2.0

11 62 30 17 4 1248.9% 50.0% 24.2% 13.7% 3.2% 100.0%

.5% 3.1% 1.5% .8% .2% 6.1%-1.6 .9 -.9 1.4 .0


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science


VeryDissatisfied

qualgene

Total

D 130

Table 94. Overall quality of University Studies/General Education courses -- Crosstabulation by College

19 35 8 2 1 6529.2% 53.8% 12.3% 3.1% 1.5% 100.0%

.9% 1.7% .4% .1% .0% 3.2%3.2 1.1 -2.4 -1.7 -.8

290 897 572 196 65 202014.4% 44.4% 28.3% 9.7% 3.2% 100.0%14.4% 44.4% 28.3% 9.7% 3.2% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total


Dissatisfied

qualgene

Total

Table 95. Variety of courses in University Studies/General Education -- Crosstabulation by College

24 44 26 14 6 11421.1% 38.6% 22.8% 12.3% 5.3% 100.0%

1.2% 2.2% 1.3% .7% .3% 5.7%.8 -.7 -.7 1.0 1.2

82 199 127 26 9 44318.5% 44.9% 28.7% 5.9% 2.0% 100.0%

4.1% 9.9% 6.3% 1.3% .4% 22.0%.4 .5 1.0 -2.5 -1.4

81 148 93 25 11 35822.6% 41.3% 26.0% 7.0% 3.1% 100.0%

4.0% 7.3% 4.6% 1.2% .5% 17.8%2.2 -.5 -.1 -1.6 -.223 109 69 37 11 249

9.2% 43.8% 27.7% 14.9% 4.4% 100.0%1.1% 5.4% 3.4% 1.8% .5% 12.4%

-3.2 .1 .4 2.7 1.025 67 25 17 4 138

18.1% 48.6% 18.1% 12.3% 2.9% 100.0%1.2% 3.3% 1.2% .8% .2% 6.8%

.1 1.0 -1.9 1.1 -.2


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life


VeryDissatisfied

vargened

Total

D 131

Table 95. Variety of courses in University Studies/General Education -- Crosstabulation by College

85 202 125 53 14 47917.7% 42.2% 26.1% 11.1% 2.9% 100.0%

4.2% 10.0% 6.2% 2.6% .7% 23.8%.0 -.3 -.1 1.1 -.43 17 18 5 4 47

6.4% 36.2% 38.3% 10.6% 8.5% 100.0%.1% .8% .9% .2% .2% 2.3%-1.9 -.7 1.6 .2 2.0

18 54 33 13 5 12314.6% 43.9% 26.8% 10.6% 4.1% 100.0%

.9% 2.7% 1.6% .6% .2% 6.1%-.8 .1 .1 .4 .517 31 14 2 1 65

26.2% 47.7% 21.5% 3.1% 1.5% 100.0%.8% 1.5% .7% .1% .0% 3.2%1.6 .6 -.7 -1.7 -.8

358 871 530 192 65 201617.8% 43.2% 26.3% 9.5% 3.2% 100.0%17.8% 43.2% 26.3% 9.5% 3.2% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Dissatisfied

vargened

Total

Table 96. Challenge of courses in University Studies/General Education -- Crosstabulation by College

22 45 31 10 5 11319.5% 39.8% 27.4% 8.8% 4.4% 100.0%

1.1% 2.2% 1.5% .5% .2% 5.6%1.1 -.8 -.3 .5 1.169 216 130 26 5 446

15.5% 48.4% 29.1% 5.8% 1.1% 100.0%3.4% 10.7% 6.4% 1.3% .2% 22.1%

-.1 1.1 .0 -1.4 -2.1


Agriculture

Business


VeryDissatisfied

challgen

Total

D 132

Table 96. Challenge of courses in University Studies/General Education -- Crosstabulation by College

71 161 97 20 6 35520.0% 45.4% 27.3% 5.6% 1.7% 100.0%

3.5% 8.0% 4.8% 1.0% .3% 17.6%2.1 .1 -.6 -1.4 -1.219 108 87 24 10 248

7.7% 43.5% 35.1% 9.7% 4.0% 100.0%.9% 5.4% 4.3% 1.2% .5% 12.3%-3.2 -.3 1.7 1.2 1.2

28 67 31 11 1 13820.3% 48.6% 22.5% 8.0% .7% 100.0%

1.4% 3.3% 1.5% .5% .0% 6.8%1.4 .6 -1.5 .1 -1.473 205 147 39 16 480

15.2% 42.7% 30.6% 8.1% 3.3% 100.0%3.6% 10.2% 7.3% 1.9% .8% 23.8%

-.2 -.7 .6 .4 .73 22 19 4 1 49

6.1% 44.9% 38.8% 8.2% 2.0% 100.0%.1% 1.1% .9% .2% .0% 2.4%-1.7 .0 1.2 .1 -.3

11 48 35 19 10 1238.9% 39.0% 28.5% 15.4% 8.1% 100.0%

.5% 2.4% 1.7% .9% .5% 6.1%-1.9 -1.0 -.1 3.1 3.6

18 33 11 1 2 6527.7% 50.8% 16.9% 1.5% 3.1% 100.0%

.9% 1.6% .5% .0% .1% 3.2%2.5 .7 -1.8 -1.8 .1

314 905 588 154 56 201715.6% 44.9% 29.2% 7.6% 2.8% 100.0%15.6% 44.9% 29.2% 7.6% 2.8% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Dissatisfied

challgen

Total

D 133

Table 97. Preparation: Communication -- Crosstabulation by College

56 36 62 2 1 13 17032.9% 21.2% 36.5% 1.2% .6% 7.6% 100.0%

2.1% 1.4% 2.4% .1% .0% .5% 6.5%2.6 -.9 -.6 -1.8 -.4 -.1

115 151 232 27 5 32 56220.5% 26.9% 41.3% 4.8% .9% 5.7% 100.0%

4.4% 5.8% 8.9% 1.0% .2% 1.2% 21.5%-1.4 1.0 .7 1.1 .0 -1.8150 114 183 10 1 41 499

30.1% 22.8% 36.7% 2.0% .2% 8.2% 100.0%5.7% 4.4% 7.0% .4% .0% 1.6% 19.1%

3.1 -.8 -1.0 -2.1 -1.6 .458 52 144 20 4 20 298

19.5% 17.4% 48.3% 6.7% 1.3% 6.7% 100.0%2.2% 2.0% 5.5% .8% .2% .8% 11.4%

-1.4 -2.5 2.4 2.5 .9 -.650 47 64 6 1 18 186

26.9% 25.3% 34.4% 3.2% .5% 9.7% 100.0%1.9% 1.8% 2.4% .2% .0% .7% 7.1%

1.0 .2 -1.1 -.4 -.5 .9128 172 222 22 9 54 607

21.1% 28.3% 36.6% 3.6% 1.5% 8.9% 100.0%4.9% 6.6% 8.5% .8% .3% 2.1% 23.2%

-1.2 1.8 -1.1 -.3 1.6 1.017 11 28 4 0 2 62

27.4% 17.7% 45.2% 6.5% .0% 3.2% 100.0%.6% .4% 1.1% .2% .0% .1% 2.4%

.7 -1.1 .7 1.0 -.7 -1.329 34 66 9 2 17 157

18.5% 21.7% 42.0% 5.7% 1.3% 10.8% 100.0%1.1% 1.3% 2.5% .3% .1% .6% 6.0%

-1.3 -.8 .5 1.2 .5 1.4


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

collegeNot at USU Very Well Well Poorly Very Poorly

NotApplicable

prepcomm

Total

D 134

Table 97. Preparation: Communication -- Crosstabulation by College

9 29 31 1 0 6 7611.8% 38.2% 40.8% 1.3% .0% 7.9% 100.0%

.3% 1.1% 1.2% .0% .0% .2% 2.9%-2.1 2.4 .2 -1.1 -.8 .0612 646 1032 101 23 203 2617

23.4% 24.7% 39.4% 3.9% .9% 7.8% 100.0%23.4% 24.7% 39.4% 3.9% .9% 7.8% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total

Not at USU Very Well Well Poorly Very PoorlyNot

Applicable

prepcomm

Total

Table 98. Preparation: Numeracy -- Crosstabulation by College

52 26 64 8 1 19 17030.6% 15.3% 37.6% 4.7% .6% 11.2% 100.0%

2.0% 1.0% 2.5% .3% .0% .7% 6.5%2.1 -1.8 -.1 -.3 -1.1 .4

108 144 234 23 8 42 55919.3% 25.8% 41.9% 4.1% 1.4% 7.5% 100.0%

4.2% 5.5% 9.0% .9% .3% 1.6% 21.5%-1.7 2.1 1.3 -1.2 -.5 -2.0149 81 184 24 5 52 495

30.1% 16.4% 37.2% 4.8% 1.0% 10.5% 100.0%5.7% 3.1% 7.1% .9% .2% 2.0% 19.1%

3.4 -2.5 -.4 -.4 -1.2 .246 109 94 17 4 28 298

15.4% 36.6% 31.5% 5.7% 1.3% 9.4% 100.0%1.8% 4.2% 3.6% .7% .2% 1.1% 11.5%

-2.7 5.6 -1.9 .4 -.5 -.553 28 75 7 3 18 184

28.8% 15.2% 40.8% 3.8% 1.6% 9.8% 100.0%2.0% 1.1% 2.9% .3% .1% .7% 7.1%

1.7 -1.9 .5 -.8 -.1 -.2


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life


NotApplicable

prepnume

Total

D 135

Table 98. Preparation: Numeracy -- Crosstabulation by College

133 97 234 45 19 69 59722.3% 16.2% 39.2% 7.5% 3.2% 11.6% 100.0%

5.1% 3.7% 9.0% 1.7% .7% 2.7% 23.0%-.3 -2.8 .3 2.5 2.7 1.016 10 25 4 2 5 62

25.8% 16.1% 40.3% 6.5% 3.2% 8.1% 100.0%.6% .4% 1.0% .2% .1% .2% 2.4%

.5 -.9 .3 .4 .9 -.523 43 61 3 2 25 157

14.6% 27.4% 38.9% 1.9% 1.3% 15.9% 100.0%.9% 1.7% 2.3% .1% .1% 1.0% 6.0%-2.1 1.6 .1 -1.8 -.4 2.2

13 23 25 5 1 8 7517.3% 30.7% 33.3% 6.7% 1.3% 10.7% 100.0%

.5% .9% 1.0% .2% .0% .3% 2.9%-1.0 1.7 -.7 .5 -.3 .1593 561 996 136 45 266 2597

22.8% 21.6% 38.4% 5.2% 1.7% 10.2% 100.0%22.8% 21.6% 38.4% 5.2% 1.7% 10.2% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Applicable

prepnume

Total

Table 99. Preparation: Computer Literacy -- Crosstabulation by College

49 29 67 10 1 14 17028.8% 17.1% 39.4% 5.9% .6% 8.2% 100.0%

1.9% 1.1% 2.6% .4% .0% .5% 6.5%2.0 -2.4 .4 .0 -1.0 .799 184 214 34 2 29 562

17.6% 32.7% 38.1% 6.0% .4% 5.2% 100.0%3.8% 7.0% 8.2% 1.3% .1% 1.1% 21.5%

-2.0 2.8 .3 .1 -2.3 -1.5


Agriculture

Business


NotApplicable

prepcomp

Total

D 136

Table 99. Preparation: Computer Literacy -- Crosstabulation by College

138 114 199 22 4 23 50027.6% 22.8% 39.8% 4.4% .8% 4.6% 100.0%

5.3% 4.4% 7.6% .8% .2% .9% 19.1%2.9 -1.7 .9 -1.4 -1.3 -1.950 103 102 16 8 20 299

16.7% 34.4% 34.1% 5.4% 2.7% 6.7% 100.0%1.9% 3.9% 3.9% .6% .3% .8% 11.4%

-1.8 2.6 -.9 -.4 1.6 -.150 56 52 10 4 13 185

27.0% 30.3% 28.1% 5.4% 2.2% 7.0% 100.0%1.9% 2.1% 2.0% .4% .2% .5% 7.1%

1.6 .9 -2.1 -.3 .7 .1124 132 242 44 13 46 601

20.6% 22.0% 40.3% 7.3% 2.2% 7.7% 100.0%4.7% 5.1% 9.3% 1.7% .5% 1.8% 23.0%

-.5 -2.3 1.2 1.4 1.3 .819 13 19 4 2 5 62

30.6% 21.0% 30.6% 6.5% 3.2% 8.1% 100.0%.7% .5% .7% .2% .1% .2% 2.4%1.5 -.9 -.9 .2 1.1 .423 41 56 13 4 21 158

14.6% 25.9% 35.4% 8.2% 2.5% 13.3% 100.0%.9% 1.6% 2.1% .5% .2% .8% 6.0%-1.9 -.2 -.4 1.2 1.0 3.1

13 26 25 2 2 7 7517.3% 34.7% 33.3% 2.7% 2.7% 9.3% 100.0%

.5% 1.0% 1.0% .1% .1% .3% 2.9%-.8 1.3 -.6 -1.2 .8 .8

565 698 976 155 40 178 261221.6% 26.7% 37.4% 5.9% 1.5% 6.8% 100.0%21.6% 26.7% 37.4% 5.9% 1.5% 6.8% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Applicable

prepcomp

Total

D 137

Table 100. Preparation: Humanities and Art -- Crosstabulation by College

49 37 56 14 4 10 17028.8% 21.8% 32.9% 8.2% 2.4% 5.9% 100.0%

1.9% 1.4% 2.2% .5% .2% .4% 6.5%1.8 -1.5 -.8 1.0 .9 .2

107 127 247 48 3 30 56219.0% 22.6% 44.0% 8.5% .5% 5.3% 100.0%

4.1% 4.9% 9.5% 1.8% .1% 1.2% 21.6%-1.6 -2.3 2.9 2.0 -1.9 -.2157 122 161 27 4 22 493

31.8% 24.7% 32.7% 5.5% .8% 4.5% 100.0%6.0% 4.7% 6.2% 1.0% .2% .8% 18.9%

4.5 -1.3 -1.4 -.8 -1.3 -1.048 55 134 36 7 16 296

16.2% 18.6% 45.3% 12.2% 2.4% 5.4% 100.0%1.8% 2.1% 5.1% 1.4% .3% .6% 11.4%

-2.2 -3.0 2.5 3.9 1.2 -.143 58 62 9 4 10 186

23.1% 31.2% 33.3% 4.8% 2.2% 5.4% 100.0%1.7% 2.2% 2.4% .3% .2% .4% 7.1%

.2 .9 -.7 -.8 .7 -.1126 250 162 16 9 40 603

20.9% 41.5% 26.9% 2.7% 1.5% 6.6% 100.0%4.8% 9.6% 6.2% .6% .3% 1.5% 23.2%

-.7 6.4 -3.9 -3.6 -.1 1.216 6 33 4 2 1 62

25.8% 9.7% 53.2% 6.5% 3.2% 1.6% 100.0%.6% .2% 1.3% .2% .1% .0% 2.4%

.6 -2.7 2.2 .0 1.1 -1.327 32 67 12 7 13 158

17.1% 20.3% 42.4% 7.6% 4.4% 8.2% 100.0%1.0% 1.2% 2.6% .5% .3% .5% 6.1%

-1.4 -1.8 1.2 .6 2.9 1.4


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science


NotApplicable

prephuma

Total

D 138

Table 100. Preparation: Humanities and Art -- Crosstabulation by College

7 36 29 0 0 2 749.5% 48.6% 39.2% .0% .0% 2.7% 100.0%

.3% 1.4% 1.1% .0% .0% .1% 2.8%-2.3 3.4 .4 -2.2 -1.1 -1.0580 723 951 166 40 144 2604

22.3% 27.8% 36.5% 6.4% 1.5% 5.5% 100.0%22.3% 27.8% 36.5% 6.4% 1.5% 5.5% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total


Applicable

prephuma

Total

Table 101. Preparation: Social Science -- Crosstabulation by College

56 28 63 11 2 9 16933.1% 16.6% 37.3% 6.5% 1.2% 5.3% 100.0%

2.2% 1.1% 2.4% .4% .1% .3% 6.5%2.9 -2.4 -.4 .7 .3 -.4

110 125 256 36 0 32 55919.7% 22.4% 45.8% 6.4% .0% 5.7% 100.0%

4.2% 4.8% 9.8% 1.4% .0% 1.2% 21.5%-1.4 -1.7 2.5 1.3 -2.3 -.3152 142 160 16 1 24 495

30.7% 28.7% 32.3% 3.2% .2% 4.8% 100.0%5.8% 5.5% 6.1% .6% .0% .9% 19.0%

3.9 1.1 -2.5 -1.9 -1.7 -1.156 51 135 33 8 15 298

18.8% 17.1% 45.3% 11.1% 2.7% 5.0% 100.0%2.2% 2.0% 5.2% 1.3% .3% .6% 11.4%

-1.3 -3.0 1.7 4.4 3.0 -.746 59 60 2 1 17 185

24.9% 31.9% 32.4% 1.1% .5% 9.2% 100.0%1.8% 2.3% 2.3% .1% .0% .7% 7.1%

.7 1.5 -1.5 -2.5 -.6 1.7


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life


NotApplicable

prepsocs

Total

D 139

Table 101. Preparation: Social Science -- Crosstabulation by College

112 206 218 19 8 40 60318.6% 34.2% 36.2% 3.2% 1.3% 6.6% 100.0%

4.3% 7.9% 8.4% .7% .3% 1.5% 23.2%-2.0 3.9 -1.2 -2.2 .9 .6

15 11 30 4 0 2 6224.2% 17.7% 48.4% 6.5% .0% 3.2% 100.0%

.6% .4% 1.2% .2% .0% .1% 2.4%.3 -1.3 1.2 .4 -.8 -.9

28 27 67 14 4 17 15717.8% 17.2% 42.7% 8.9% 2.5% 10.8% 100.0%

1.1% 1.0% 2.6% .5% .2% .7% 6.0%-1.2 -2.2 .7 2.0 2.0 2.4

8 31 32 1 1 2 7510.7% 41.3% 42.7% 1.3% 1.3% 2.7% 100.0%

.3% 1.2% 1.2% .0% .0% .1% 2.9%-2.1 2.6 .5 -1.5 .3 -1.2583 680 1021 136 25 158 2603

22.4% 26.1% 39.2% 5.2% 1.0% 6.1% 100.0%22.4% 26.1% 39.2% 5.2% 1.0% 6.1% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Applicable

prepsocs

Total

Table 102. Preparation: Life Science -- Crosstabulation by College

50 42 59 8 1 11 17129.2% 24.6% 34.5% 4.7% .6% 6.4% 100.0%

1.9% 1.6% 2.3% .3% .0% .4% 6.6%1.5 1.2 -1.3 -.9 -.8 -.4

120 103 258 40 4 35 56021.4% 18.4% 46.1% 7.1% .7% 6.3% 100.0%

4.6% 3.9% 9.9% 1.5% .2% 1.3% 21.5%-1.1 -1.1 1.9 .7 -1.2 -.8


Agriculture

Business


NotApplicable

preplfsc

Total

D 140

Table 102. Preparation: Life Science -- Crosstabulation by College

152 100 198 19 4 26 49930.5% 20.0% 39.7% 3.8% .8% 5.2% 100.0%

5.8% 3.8% 7.6% .7% .2% 1.0% 19.1%3.1 -.2 -.4 -2.3 -1.0 -1.756 60 131 24 5 22 298

18.8% 20.1% 44.0% 8.1% 1.7% 7.4% 100.0%2.1% 2.3% 5.0% .9% .2% .8% 11.4%

-1.7 -.2 .8 1.2 .6 .147 40 71 8 3 16 185

25.4% 21.6% 38.4% 4.3% 1.6% 8.6% 100.0%1.8% 1.5% 2.7% .3% .1% .6% 7.1%

.5 .3 -.5 -1.1 .4 .7131 114 251 50 11 46 603

21.7% 18.9% 41.6% 8.3% 1.8% 7.6% 100.0%5.0% 4.4% 9.6% 1.9% .4% 1.8% 23.1%

-1.0 -.9 .3 1.9 1.1 .420 14 22 3 0 3 62

32.3% 22.6% 35.5% 4.8% .0% 4.8% 100.0%.8% .5% .8% .1% .0% .1% 2.4%1.4 .4 -.7 -.5 -.9 -.731 40 47 11 4 25 158

19.6% 25.3% 29.7% 7.0% 2.5% 15.8% 100.0%1.2% 1.5% 1.8% .4% .2% 1.0% 6.1%

-1.0 1.3 -2.2 .3 1.4 4.011 23 31 3 2 4 74

14.9% 31.1% 41.9% 4.1% 2.7% 5.4% 100.0%.4% .9% 1.2% .1% .1% .2% 2.8%-1.6 2.0 .1 -.8 1.1 -.6618 536 1068 166 34 188 2610

23.7% 20.5% 40.9% 6.4% 1.3% 7.2% 100.0%23.7% 20.5% 40.9% 6.4% 1.3% 7.2% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


Applicable

preplfsc

Total

D 141

Table 103. Preparation: Physical Science -- Crosstabulation by College

54 36 62 6 0 13 17131.6% 21.1% 36.3% 3.5% .0% 7.6% 100.0%

2.1% 1.4% 2.4% .2% .0% .5% 6.6%2.1 -.2 -.6 -1.3 -1.4 -.3

120 107 250 40 5 37 55921.5% 19.1% 44.7% 7.2% .9% 6.6% 100.0%

4.6% 4.1% 9.6% 1.5% .2% 1.4% 21.4%-1.1 -1.3 2.1 1.1 -.6 -1.3160 91 191 22 4 33 501

31.9% 18.2% 38.1% 4.4% .8% 6.6% 100.0%6.1% 3.5% 7.3% .8% .2% 1.3% 19.2%

3.8 -1.7 -.3 -1.5 -.7 -1.357 100 93 14 2 32 298

19.1% 33.6% 31.2% 4.7% .7% 10.7% 100.0%2.2% 3.8% 3.6% .5% .1% 1.2% 11.4%

-1.6 4.4 -2.2 -.9 -.8 1.548 36 71 10 4 16 185

25.9% 19.5% 38.4% 5.4% 2.2% 8.6% 100.0%1.8% 1.4% 2.7% .4% .2% .6% 7.1%

.6 -.7 -.2 -.3 1.3 .2129 114 247 54 10 48 602

21.4% 18.9% 41.0% 9.0% 1.7% 8.0% 100.0%4.9% 4.4% 9.5% 2.1% .4% 1.8% 23.1%

-1.2 -1.5 .8 3.0 1.2 -.215 17 24 2 2 2 62

24.2% 27.4% 38.7% 3.2% 3.2% 3.2% 100.0%.6% .7% .9% .1% .1% .1% 2.4%

.1 1.0 .0 -.9 1.5 -1.424 46 52 4 2 28 156

15.4% 29.5% 33.3% 2.6% 1.3% 17.9% 100.0%.9% 1.8% 2.0% .2% .1% 1.1% 6.0%-2.1 2.1 -1.2 -1.8 .2 4.2


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science


NotApplicable

prepphys

Total

D 142

Table 103. Preparation: Physical Science -- Crosstabulation by College

13 20 30 5 1 6 7517.3% 26.7% 40.0% 6.7% 1.3% 8.0% 100.0%

.5% .8% 1.1% .2% .0% .2% 2.9%-1.1 .9 .1 .2 .1 -.1620 567 1020 157 30 215 2609

23.8% 21.7% 39.1% 6.0% 1.1% 8.2% 100.0%23.8% 21.7% 39.1% 6.0% 1.1% 8.2% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total


Applicable

prepphys

Total

Table 104. Impression: Undergraduate programs -- Crosstabulation by College

14 74 73 9 1 1718.2% 43.3% 42.7% 5.3% .6% 100.0%

.5% 2.8% 2.8% .3% .0% 6.5%1.8 -.2 -.1 -.7 -.226 231 275 37 3 572

4.5% 40.4% 48.1% 6.5% .5% 100.0%1.0% 8.8% 10.4% 1.4% .1% 21.7%

-.5 -1.4 1.8 -.3 -.628 263 178 30 4 503

5.6% 52.3% 35.4% 6.0% .8% 100.0%1.1% 10.0% 6.7% 1.1% .2% 19.1%

.5 2.7 -2.6 -.7 .27 126 146 20 1 300

2.3% 42.0% 48.7% 6.7% .3% 100.0%.3% 4.8% 5.5% .8% .0% 11.4%-2.1 -.6 1.5 -.1 -.8

5 99 70 12 0 1862.7% 53.2% 37.6% 6.5% .0% 100.0%

.2% 3.8% 2.7% .5% .0% 7.1%-1.4 1.8 -1.1 -.2 -1.2


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

collegeNo Opinion Very Good Good Fair Poor

impugpgsTotal

D 143

Table 104. Impression: Undergraduate programs -- Crosstabulation by College

40 260 263 42 8 6136.5% 42.4% 42.9% 6.9% 1.3% 100.0%1.5% 9.9% 10.0% 1.6% .3% 23.2%

1.6 -.7 -.1 .1 1.71 23 26 9 0 59

1.7% 39.0% 44.1% 15.3% .0% 100.0%.0% .9% 1.0% .3% .0% 2.2%-1.1 -.6 .1 2.5 -.7

7 56 78 16 2 1594.4% 35.2% 49.1% 10.1% 1.3% 100.0%

.3% 2.1% 3.0% .6% .1% 6.0%-.4 -1.7 1.1 1.6 .8

5 39 28 3 0 756.7% 52.0% 37.3% 4.0% .0% 100.0%

.2% 1.5% 1.1% .1% .0% 2.8%.6 1.0 -.8 -.9 -.7

133 1171 1137 178 19 26385.0% 44.4% 43.1% 6.7% .7% 100.0%5.0% 44.4% 43.1% 6.7% .7% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

No Opinion Very Good Good Fair Poorimpugpgs

Total

Table 105. Impression: Your major department -- Crosstabulation by College

3 118 43 6 1 1711.8% 69.0% 25.1% 3.5% .6% 100.0%

.1% 4.5% 1.6% .2% .0% 6.5%-1.6 1.6 -.6 -1.6 -1.3

20 296 204 45 7 5723.5% 51.7% 35.7% 7.9% 1.2% 100.0%

.8% 11.2% 7.7% 1.7% .3% 21.6%-.9 -2.4 3.7 1.0 -1.3


Agriculture

Business


impmdeptTotal

D 144

Table 105. Impression: Your major department -- Crosstabulation by College

21 375 85 23 4 5084.1% 73.8% 16.7% 4.5% .8% 100.0%

.8% 14.2% 3.2% .9% .2% 19.2%-.1 4.2 -4.7 -1.9 -1.910 177 88 18 7 300

3.3% 59.0% 29.3% 6.0% 2.3% 100.0%.4% 6.7% 3.3% .7% .3% 11.3%

-.8 -.1 .6 -.5 .41 119 46 16 4 186

.5% 64.0% 24.7% 8.6% 2.2% 100.0%

.0% 4.5% 1.7% .6% .2% 7.0%-2.4 .8 -.7 1.0 .1

35 340 167 50 23 6155.7% 55.3% 27.2% 8.1% 3.7% 100.0%1.3% 12.8% 6.3% 1.9% .9% 23.2%

1.8 -1.3 -.2 1.3 3.04 35 16 4 2 61

6.6% 57.4% 26.2% 6.6% 3.3% 100.0%.2% 1.3% .6% .2% .1% 2.3%

.9 -.2 -.2 -.1 .76 79 55 14 5 159

3.8% 49.7% 34.6% 8.8% 3.1% 100.0%.2% 3.0% 2.1% .5% .2% 6.0%

-.3 -1.6 1.7 1.0 1.012 33 26 3 0 74

16.2% 44.6% 35.1% 4.1% .0% 100.0%.5% 1.2% 1.0% .1% .0% 2.8%5.0 -1.7 1.2 -.9 -1.2

112 1572 730 179 53 26464.2% 59.4% 27.6% 6.8% 2.0% 100.0%4.2% 59.4% 27.6% 6.8% 2.0% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

No Opinion Very Good Good Fair Poorimpmdept

Total

D 145

Table 106. Impression: Teaching ability of faculty -- Crosstabualtion by College

4 86 66 10 4 1702.4% 50.6% 38.8% 5.9% 2.4% 100.0%

.2% 3.2% 2.5% .4% .2% 6.4%-.7 1.1 -.3 -1.6 .513 224 254 71 12 574

2.3% 39.0% 44.3% 12.4% 2.1% 100.0%.5% 8.4% 9.6% 2.7% .5% 21.6%-1.4 -2.1 1.6 2.0 .5

11 266 194 29 9 5092.2% 52.3% 38.1% 5.7% 1.8% 100.0%

.4% 10.0% 7.3% 1.1% .3% 19.2%-1.5 2.5 -.7 -3.0 -.1

10 129 117 38 6 3003.3% 43.0% 39.0% 12.7% 2.0% 100.0%

.4% 4.9% 4.4% 1.4% .2% 11.3%.0 -.5 -.3 1.6 .24 92 72 16 3 187

2.1% 49.2% 38.5% 8.6% 1.6% 100.0%.2% 3.5% 2.7% .6% .1% 7.0%

-.9 .9 -.3 -.5 -.235 284 238 53 8 618

5.7% 46.0% 38.5% 8.6% 1.3% 100.0%1.3% 10.7% 9.0% 2.0% .3% 23.3%

3.1 .4 -.6 -1.0 -1.01 30 21 7 2 61

1.6% 49.2% 34.4% 11.5% 3.3% 100.0%.0% 1.1% .8% .3% .1% 2.3%

-.7 .5 -.7 .4 .96 45 74 30 4 159

3.8% 28.3% 46.5% 18.9% 2.5% 100.0%.2% 1.7% 2.8% 1.1% .2% 6.0%

.3 -3.1 1.3 3.7 .7


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science


impteachTotal

D 146

Table 106. Impression: Teaching ability of faculty -- Crosstabualtion by College

5 36 28 6 0 756.7% 48.0% 37.3% 8.0% .0% 100.0%

.2% 1.4% 1.1% .2% .0% 2.8%1.6 .4 -.4 -.5 -1.289 1192 1064 260 48 2653

3.4% 44.9% 40.1% 9.8% 1.8% 100.0%3.4% 44.9% 40.1% 9.8% 1.8% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total

No Opinion Very Good Good Fair Poorimpteach

Total

Table 107. Impression: Personal interest of faculty in students -- Crosstabulation by College

7 74 59 24 6 1704.1% 43.5% 34.7% 14.1% 3.5% 100.0%

.3% 2.8% 2.2% .9% .2% 6.4%.2 1.0 -.8 -.4 .0

19 190 237 104 21 5713.3% 33.3% 41.5% 18.2% 3.7% 100.0%

.7% 7.2% 9.0% 3.9% .8% 21.6%-.6 -2.1 1.2 1.7 .118 222 184 67 15 506

3.6% 43.9% 36.4% 13.2% 3.0% 100.0%.7% 8.4% 7.0% 2.5% .6% 19.1%

-.3 1.8 -.7 -1.3 -.77 98 138 46 11 300

2.3% 32.7% 46.0% 15.3% 3.7% 100.0%.3% 3.7% 5.2% 1.7% .4% 11.4%-1.3 -1.7 2.2 -.1 .1

4 76 73 27 5 1852.2% 41.1% 39.5% 14.6% 2.7% 100.0%

.2% 2.9% 2.8% 1.0% .2% 7.0%-1.2 .5 .3 -.3 -.6


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life


impfaculTotal

D 147

Table 107. Impression: Personal interest of faculty in students -- Crosstabulation by College

32 260 227 79 18 6165.2% 42.2% 36.9% 12.8% 2.9% 100.0%1.2% 9.8% 8.6% 3.0% .7% 23.3%

1.7 1.4 -.6 -1.7 -.92 20 18 16 5 61

3.3% 32.8% 29.5% 26.2% 8.2% 100.0%.1% .8% .7% .6% .2% 2.3%

-.2 -.8 -1.1 2.1 1.96 51 52 36 14 159

3.8% 32.1% 32.7% 22.6% 8.8% 100.0%.2% 1.9% 2.0% 1.4% .5% 6.0%

-.1 -1.4 -1.1 2.3 3.57 34 24 10 0 75

9.3% 45.3% 32.0% 13.3% .0% 100.0%.3% 1.3% .9% .4% .0% 2.8%2.4 .9 -.9 -.5 -1.6

102 1025 1012 409 95 26433.9% 38.8% 38.3% 15.5% 3.6% 100.0%3.9% 38.8% 38.3% 15.5% 3.6% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

No Opinion Very Good Good Fair Poorimpfacul

Total

Table 108. Impression: Quality of students -- Crosstabulation by College

7 72 78 12 1 1704.1% 42.4% 45.9% 7.1% .6% 100.0%

.3% 2.7% 3.0% .5% .0% 6.4%-.5 1.0 .1 -1.6 -.625 176 290 75 6 572

4.4% 30.8% 50.7% 13.1% 1.0% 100.0%.9% 6.7% 11.0% 2.8% .2% 21.7%

-.7 -2.6 1.9 1.5 -.1


Agriculture

Business


impqstudTotal

D 148

Table 108. Impression: Quality of students -- Crosstabulation by College

27 218 223 36 3 5075.3% 43.0% 44.0% 7.1% .6% 100.0%1.0% 8.3% 8.4% 1.4% .1% 19.2%

.3 2.0 -.5 -2.7 -1.110 124 132 30 1 297

3.4% 41.8% 44.4% 10.1% .3% 100.0%.4% 4.7% 5.0% 1.1% .0% 11.2%-1.3 1.2 -.3 -.5 -1.3

7 90 69 16 2 1843.8% 48.9% 37.5% 8.7% 1.1% 100.0%

.3% 3.4% 2.6% .6% .1% 7.0%-.7 2.5 -1.6 -.9 .034 209 280 82 12 617

5.5% 33.9% 45.4% 13.3% 1.9% 100.0%1.3% 7.9% 10.6% 3.1% .5% 23.4%

.6 -1.4 .0 1.7 2.01 25 24 11 0 61

1.6% 41.0% 39.3% 18.0% .0% 100.0%.0% .9% .9% .4% .0% 2.3%-1.2 .5 -.7 1.7 -.8

12 41 78 25 3 1597.5% 25.8% 49.1% 15.7% 1.9% 100.0%

.5% 1.6% 3.0% .9% .1% 6.0%1.4 -2.4 .7 1.8 .9

9 34 27 4 1 7512.0% 45.3% 36.0% 5.3% 1.3% 100.0%

.3% 1.3% 1.0% .2% .0% 2.8%2.7 1.1 -1.2 -1.5 .2

132 989 1201 291 29 26425.0% 37.4% 45.5% 11.0% 1.1% 100.0%5.0% 37.4% 45.5% 11.0% 1.1% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

No Opinion Very Good Good Fair Poorimpqstud

Total

D 149

Table 109. Impression: Research activities -- Crosstabulation by College

28 52 66 18 6 17016.5% 30.6% 38.8% 10.6% 3.5% 100.0%

1.1% 2.0% 2.5% .7% .2% 6.5%-.5 1.0 .5 -1.5 .0

109 114 221 100 21 56519.3% 20.2% 39.1% 17.7% 3.7% 100.0%

4.1% 4.3% 8.4% 3.8% .8% 21.5%.6 -3.0 1.0 1.7 .2

115 138 186 57 10 50622.7% 27.3% 36.8% 11.3% 2.0% 100.0%

4.4% 5.2% 7.1% 2.2% .4% 19.2%2.4 .2 .0 -2.1 -1.939 92 98 56 14 299

13.0% 30.8% 32.8% 18.7% 4.7% 100.0%1.5% 3.5% 3.7% 2.1% .5% 11.4%

-2.1 1.3 -1.1 1.7 1.134 56 61 27 8 186

18.3% 30.1% 32.8% 14.5% 4.3% 100.0%1.3% 2.1% 2.3% 1.0% .3% 7.1%

.0 .9 -.9 -.1 .696 159 235 100 22 612

15.7% 26.0% 38.4% 16.3% 3.6% 100.0%3.6% 6.0% 8.9% 3.8% .8% 23.3%

-1.4 -.4 .7 .9 .17 27 12 11 4 61

11.5% 44.3% 19.7% 18.0% 6.6% 100.0%.3% 1.0% .5% .4% .2% 2.3%-1.2 2.6 -2.2 .6 1.3

32 44 60 16 7 15920.1% 27.7% 37.7% 10.1% 4.4% 100.0%

1.2% 1.7% 2.3% .6% .3% 6.0%.6 .2 .2 -1.6 .6


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science


impreseaTotal

D 150

Table 109. Impression: Research activities -- Crosstabulation by College

18 22 25 7 1 7324.7% 30.1% 34.2% 9.6% 1.4% 100.0%

.7% .8% 1.0% .3% .0% 2.8%1.3 .6 -.3 -1.2 -1.0

478 704 964 392 93 263118.2% 26.8% 36.6% 14.9% 3.5% 100.0%18.2% 26.8% 36.6% 14.9% 3.5% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total

No Opinion Very Good Good Fair Poorimpresea

Total

Table 110. Impression: Public relations -- Crosstabulation by College

30 38 69 23 9 16917.8% 22.5% 40.8% 13.6% 5.3% 100.0%

1.1% 1.4% 2.6% .9% .3% 6.4%.5 -.2 .0 -.6 .7

86 117 247 91 25 56615.2% 20.7% 43.6% 16.1% 4.4% 100.0%

3.3% 4.4% 9.4% 3.5% .9% 21.5%-.7 -1.3 1.1 .4 .296 129 212 62 8 507

18.9% 25.4% 41.8% 12.2% 1.6% 100.0%3.6% 4.9% 8.0% 2.4% .3% 19.2%

1.5 1.0 .4 -1.8 -2.939 59 121 61 19 299

13.0% 19.7% 40.5% 20.4% 6.4% 100.0%1.5% 2.2% 4.6% 2.3% .7% 11.3%

-1.4 -1.3 -.1 2.2 1.825 56 75 24 6 186

13.4% 30.1% 40.3% 12.9% 3.2% 100.0%.9% 2.1% 2.8% .9% .2% 7.1%-1.0 1.9 -.1 -.9 -.7


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life


impprelaTotal

D 151

Table 110. Impression: Public relations -- Crosstabulation by College

97 158 234 94 32 61515.8% 25.7% 38.0% 15.3% 5.2% 100.0%

3.7% 6.0% 8.9% 3.6% 1.2% 23.3%-.3 1.2 -1.1 -.1 1.2

8 13 25 8 7 6113.1% 21.3% 41.0% 13.1% 11.5% 100.0%

.3% .5% .9% .3% .3% 2.3%-.6 -.3 .0 -.4 2.836 23 61 33 5 158

22.8% 14.6% 38.6% 20.9% 3.2% 100.0%1.4% .9% 2.3% 1.3% .2% 6.0%

2.0 -2.3 -.4 1.8 -.613 22 30 9 0 74

17.6% 29.7% 40.5% 12.2% .0% 100.0%.5% .8% 1.1% .3% .0% 2.8%

.3 1.1 .0 -.7 -1.8430 615 1074 405 111 2635

16.3% 23.3% 40.8% 15.4% 4.2% 100.0%16.3% 23.3% 40.8% 15.4% 4.2% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

No Opinion Very Good Good Fair Poorimpprela

Total

Table 111. The open access labs had the software I needed -- Crosstabulation by College

56 58 21 5 0 24 16434.1% 35.4% 12.8% 3.0% .0% 14.6% 100.0%

2.2% 2.3% .8% .2% .0% .9% 6.4%-.6 -1.4 1.0 -.6 -1.6 5.8

211 245 57 19 7 16 55538.0% 44.1% 10.3% 3.4% 1.3% 2.9% 100.0%

8.2% 9.5% 2.2% .7% .3% .6% 21.6%.3 .7 .0 -.6 -.5 -2.0


Agriculture

Business

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

softneed

Total

D 152

Table 111. The open access labs had the software I needed -- Crosstabulation by College

201 193 47 15 2 35 49340.8% 39.1% 9.5% 3.0% .4% 7.1% 100.0%

7.8% 7.5% 1.8% .6% .1% 1.4% 19.2%1.3 -1.1 -.5 -1.0 -2.0 2.490 160 24 14 4 3 295

30.5% 54.2% 8.1% 4.7% 1.4% 1.0% 100.0%3.5% 6.2% .9% .5% .2% .1% 11.5%

-1.9 3.1 -1.1 .7 -.2 -3.078 68 15 10 3 9 183

42.6% 37.2% 8.2% 5.5% 1.6% 4.9% 100.0%3.0% 2.6% .6% .4% .1% .3% 7.1%

1.2 -1.1 -.9 1.0 .1 .1226 247 63 25 16 16 593

38.1% 41.7% 10.6% 4.2% 2.7% 2.7% 100.0%8.8% 9.6% 2.4% 1.0% .6% .6% 23.1%

.4 -.3 .3 .3 2.3 -2.316 26 8 1 2 8 61

26.2% 42.6% 13.1% 1.6% 3.3% 13.1% 100.0%.6% 1.0% .3% .0% .1% .3% 2.4%-1.4 .0 .7 -.9 1.1 3.0

48 70 19 13 4 4 15830.4% 44.3% 12.0% 8.2% 2.5% 2.5% 100.0%

1.9% 2.7% .7% .5% .2% .2% 6.1%-1.4 .4 .7 2.7 1.0 -1.3

30 22 9 0 1 8 7042.9% 31.4% 12.9% .0% 1.4% 11.4% 100.0%

1.2% .9% .3% .0% .0% .3% 2.7%.8 -1.4 .7 -1.7 -.1 2.5

956 1089 263 102 39 123 257237.2% 42.3% 10.2% 4.0% 1.5% 4.8% 100.0%37.2% 42.3% 10.2% 4.0% 1.5% 4.8% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

softneed

Total

D 153

Table 112. Lab consultants provided the help I needed -- Crosstabulation by College

26 56 37 10 5 30 16415.9% 34.1% 22.6% 6.1% 3.0% 18.3% 100.0%

1.0% 2.2% 1.4% .4% .2% 1.2% 6.4%-1.7 -.4 -.5 -.5 .0 5.3124 201 145 36 16 33 555

22.3% 36.2% 26.1% 6.5% 2.9% 5.9% 100.0%4.8% 7.8% 5.6% 1.4% .6% 1.3% 21.6%

.1 .0 .8 -.5 -.1 -1.1127 176 102 35 8 45 493

25.8% 35.7% 20.7% 7.1% 1.6% 9.1% 100.0%4.9% 6.8% 4.0% 1.4% .3% 1.7% 19.1%

1.7 -.2 -1.7 .0 -1.8 1.644 115 85 28 15 9 296

14.9% 38.9% 28.7% 9.5% 5.1% 3.0% 100.0%1.7% 4.5% 3.3% 1.1% .6% .3% 11.5%

-2.7 .8 1.5 1.5 2.1 -2.746 60 52 9 4 12 183

25.1% 32.8% 28.4% 4.9% 2.2% 6.6% 100.0%1.8% 2.3% 2.0% .3% .2% .5% 7.1%

.9 -.8 1.1 -1.1 -.6 -.3145 224 132 42 19 33 595

24.4% 37.6% 22.2% 7.1% 3.2% 5.5% 100.0%5.6% 8.7% 5.1% 1.6% .7% 1.3% 23.1%

1.2 .6 -1.1 .0 .3 -1.510 15 24 2 2 8 61

16.4% 24.6% 39.3% 3.3% 3.3% 13.1% 100.0%.4% .6% .9% .1% .1% .3% 2.4%-1.0 -1.5 2.4 -1.1 .1 1.7

29 60 41 14 7 7 15818.4% 38.0% 25.9% 8.9% 4.4% 4.4% 100.0%

1.1% 2.3% 1.6% .5% .3% .3% 6.1%-1.0 .4 .4 .8 1.0 -1.3


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

helpneed

Total

D 154

Table 112. Lab consultants provided the help I needed -- Crosstabulation by College

19 25 11 6 1 8 7027.1% 35.7% 15.7% 8.6% 1.4% 11.4% 100.0%

.7% 1.0% .4% .2% .0% .3% 2.7%.9 -.1 -1.5 .5 -.8 1.3

570 932 629 182 77 185 257522.1% 36.2% 24.4% 7.1% 3.0% 7.2% 100.0%22.1% 36.2% 24.4% 7.1% 3.0% 7.2% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

helpneed

Total

Table 113. I didn't wait long for an available computer in the lab -- Crosstabulation by College

28 61 31 20 2 22 16417.1% 37.2% 18.9% 12.2% 1.2% 13.4% 100.0%

1.1% 2.4% 1.2% .8% .1% .9% 6.4%-1.0 -1.0 -.2 .9 -1.4 5.5129 247 108 39 17 14 554

23.3% 44.6% 19.5% 7.0% 3.1% 2.5% 100.0%5.0% 9.6% 4.2% 1.5% .7% .5% 21.5%

1.3 .9 .0 -2.1 -.2 -2.1121 191 88 51 12 31 494

24.5% 38.7% 17.8% 10.3% 2.4% 6.3% 100.0%4.7% 7.4% 3.4% 2.0% .5% 1.2% 19.2%

1.9 -1.2 -.9 .3 -.9 2.046 152 61 24 7 6 296

15.5% 51.4% 20.6% 8.1% 2.4% 2.0% 100.0%1.8% 5.9% 2.4% .9% .3% .2% 11.5%

-2.0 2.4 .4 -1.0 -.8 -2.043 68 36 24 4 9 184

23.4% 37.0% 19.6% 13.0% 2.2% 4.9% 100.0%1.7% 2.6% 1.4% .9% .2% .3% 7.1%

.8 -1.1 .0 1.4 -.8 .3


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

waitcomp

Total

D 155

Table 113. I didn't wait long for an available computer in the lab -- Crosstabulation by College

123 251 114 63 30 14 59520.7% 42.2% 19.2% 10.6% 5.0% 2.4% 100.0%

4.8% 9.7% 4.4% 2.4% 1.2% .5% 23.1%.0 .0 -.2 .5 2.5 -2.49 21 16 6 2 7 61

14.8% 34.4% 26.2% 9.8% 3.3% 11.5% 100.0%.3% .8% .6% .2% .1% .3% 2.4%-1.0 -.9 1.2 .0 .0 2.6

18 69 36 24 6 4 15711.5% 43.9% 22.9% 15.3% 3.8% 2.5% 100.0%

.7% 2.7% 1.4% .9% .2% .2% 6.1%-2.5 .3 1.0 2.1 .4 -1.1

16 27 14 4 2 7 7022.9% 38.6% 20.0% 5.7% 2.9% 10.0% 100.0%

.6% 1.0% .5% .2% .1% .3% 2.7%.4 -.5 .1 -1.1 -.2 2.2

533 1087 504 255 82 114 257520.7% 42.2% 19.6% 9.9% 3.2% 4.4% 100.0%20.7% 42.2% 19.6% 9.9% 3.2% 4.4% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

waitcomp

Total

Table 114. Overall, I was satisfied with the open access labs -- Crosstabulation by College

40 81 13 8 0 22 16424.4% 49.4% 7.9% 4.9% .0% 13.4% 100.0%

1.6% 3.1% .5% .3% .0% .9% 6.4%-1.3 .1 -1.8 1.4 -1.4 6.0182 283 58 14 5 14 556

32.7% 50.9% 10.4% 2.5% .9% 2.5% 100.0%7.1% 11.0% 2.3% .5% .2% .5% 21.6%

1.2 .8 -1.8 -.7 -.8 -1.7


Agriculture

Business

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

satislab

Total

D 156

Table 114. Overall, I was satisfied with the open access labs -- Crosstabulation by College

177 208 62 11 4 29 49136.0% 42.4% 12.6% 2.2% .8% 5.9% 100.0%

6.9% 8.1% 2.4% .4% .2% 1.1% 19.1%2.5 -2.0 -.3 -1.0 -.9 2.162 171 47 10 3 3 296

20.9% 57.8% 15.9% 3.4% 1.0% 1.0% 100.0%2.4% 6.6% 1.8% .4% .1% .1% 11.5%

-2.8 2.3 1.3 .3 -.4 -2.665 84 20 4 2 8 183

35.5% 45.9% 10.9% 2.2% 1.1% 4.4% 100.0%2.5% 3.3% .8% .2% .1% .3% 7.1%

1.4 -.5 -.8 -.7 -.2 .3180 277 98 20 11 10 596

30.2% 46.5% 16.4% 3.4% 1.8% 1.7% 100.0%7.0% 10.8% 3.8% .8% .4% .4% 23.1%

.1 -.7 2.2 .5 1.2 -2.810 32 10 1 2 6 61

16.4% 52.5% 16.4% 1.6% 3.3% 9.8% 100.0%.4% 1.2% .4% .0% .1% .2% 2.4%-1.9 .4 .7 -.6 1.4 2.3

34 85 23 6 6 4 15821.5% 53.8% 14.6% 3.8% 3.8% 2.5% 100.0%

1.3% 3.3% .9% .2% .2% .2% 6.1%-1.9 .9 .5 .6 2.8 -.9

21 30 8 4 0 7 7030.0% 42.9% 11.4% 5.7% .0% 10.0% 100.0%

.8% 1.2% .3% .2% .0% .3% 2.7%.0 -.7 -.4 1.3 -.9 2.5

771 1251 339 78 33 103 257529.9% 48.6% 13.2% 3.0% 1.3% 4.0% 100.0%29.9% 48.6% 13.2% 3.0% 1.3% 4.0% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

satislab

Total

D 157

Table 115. Overall, I was satisfied with my USU email account -- Crosstabulation by College

49 63 21 6 3 23 16529.7% 38.2% 12.7% 3.6% 1.8% 13.9% 100.0%

1.9% 2.4% .8% .2% .1% .9% 6.4%-.5 -1.1 .2 -.6 -.8 6.2

182 244 64 31 17 19 55732.7% 43.8% 11.5% 5.6% 3.1% 3.4% 100.0%

7.1% 9.5% 2.5% 1.2% .7% .7% 21.6%.3 -.1 -.5 1.0 .3 -.8

178 206 59 20 13 21 49735.8% 41.4% 11.9% 4.0% 2.6% 4.2% 100.0%

6.9% 8.0% 2.3% .8% .5% .8% 19.3%1.5 -.9 -.3 -.7 -.3 .183 149 34 12 11 7 296

28.0% 50.3% 11.5% 4.1% 3.7% 2.4% 100.0%3.2% 5.8% 1.3% .5% .4% .3% 11.5%

-1.2 1.6 -.4 -.5 .9 -1.569 77 19 9 4 4 182

37.9% 42.3% 10.4% 4.9% 2.2% 2.2% 100.0%2.7% 3.0% .7% .3% .2% .2% 7.1%

1.4 -.4 -.7 .2 -.5 -1.3185 254 87 29 18 18 591

31.3% 43.0% 14.7% 4.9% 3.0% 3.0% 100.0%7.2% 9.9% 3.4% 1.1% .7% .7% 22.9%

-.3 -.4 1.7 .3 .3 -1.314 31 10 2 1 2 60

23.3% 51.7% 16.7% 3.3% 1.7% 3.3% 100.0%.5% 1.2% .4% .1% .0% .1% 2.3%-1.2 .9 1.0 -.5 -.5 -.3

38 87 16 8 5 4 15824.1% 55.1% 10.1% 5.1% 3.2% 2.5% 100.0%

1.5% 3.4% .6% .3% .2% .2% 6.1%-1.8 2.1 -.8 .2 .2 -1.0


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

satisemail

Total

D 158

Table 115. Overall, I was satisfied with my USU email account -- Crosstabulation by College

27 24 7 3 1 8 7038.6% 34.3% 10.0% 4.3% 1.4% 11.4% 100.0%

1.0% .9% .3% .1% .0% .3% 2.7%1.0 -1.2 -.5 -.1 -.7 3.0

825 1135 317 120 73 106 257632.0% 44.1% 12.3% 4.7% 2.8% 4.1% 100.0%32.0% 44.1% 12.3% 4.7% 2.8% 4.1% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

satisemail

Total

Table 116. Overall, I was satisfied with the USU modem access -- Crosstabulation by College

40 54 24 5 6 35 16424.4% 32.9% 14.6% 3.0% 3.7% 21.3% 100.0%

1.6% 2.1% .9% .2% .2% 1.4% 6.4%-.4 -1.1 -.6 -.7 .8 3.3

144 205 93 24 15 71 55226.1% 37.1% 16.8% 4.3% 2.7% 12.9% 100.0%

5.6% 8.0% 3.6% .9% .6% 2.8% 21.6%.0 -.5 .2 .2 .1 .3

145 186 71 18 9 61 49029.6% 38.0% 14.5% 3.7% 1.8% 12.4% 100.0%

5.7% 7.3% 2.8% .7% .4% 2.4% 19.2%1.6 -.2 -1.1 -.5 -1.1 .167 119 51 10 4 44 295

22.7% 40.3% 17.3% 3.4% 1.4% 14.9% 100.0%2.6% 4.7% 2.0% .4% .2% 1.7% 11.6%

-1.1 .5 .4 -.6 -1.3 1.357 74 28 5 6 12 182

31.3% 40.7% 15.4% 2.7% 3.3% 6.6% 100.0%2.2% 2.9% 1.1% .2% .2% .5% 7.1%

1.4 .5 -.3 -.9 .6 -2.2


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

satismodem

Total

D 159

Table 116. Overall, I was satisfied with the USU modem access -- Crosstabulation by College

152 225 105 31 10 61 58426.0% 38.5% 18.0% 5.3% 1.7% 10.4% 100.0%

6.0% 8.8% 4.1% 1.2% .4% 2.4% 22.9%.0 .0 .9 1.4 -1.4 -1.3

12 24 13 1 5 3 5820.7% 41.4% 22.4% 1.7% 8.6% 5.2% 100.0%

.5% .9% .5% .0% .2% .1% 2.3%-.8 .4 1.1 -.9 2.8 -1.627 67 24 8 11 21 158

17.1% 42.4% 15.2% 5.1% 7.0% 13.3% 100.0%1.1% 2.6% .9% .3% .4% .8% 6.2%

-2.2 .8 -.4 .6 3.4 .319 27 10 4 1 7 68

27.9% 39.7% 14.7% 5.9% 1.5% 10.3% 100.0%.7% 1.1% .4% .2% .0% .3% 2.7%

.3 .2 -.3 .7 -.6 -.5663 981 419 106 67 315 2551

26.0% 38.5% 16.4% 4.2% 2.6% 12.3% 100.0%26.0% 38.5% 16.4% 4.2% 2.6% 12.3% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

satismodem

Total

Table 117. Overall, I was satisfied with the dorm internet access -- Crosstabualtion by College

18 17 25 2 2 93 15711.5% 10.8% 15.9% 1.3% 1.3% 59.2% 100.0%

.7% .7% 1.0% .1% .1% 3.8% 6.5%-1.6 -2.0 -.1 -.3 .3 2.2

89 100 93 9 3 231 52517.0% 19.0% 17.7% 1.7% .6% 44.0% 100.0%

3.7% 4.1% 3.8% .4% .1% 9.5% 21.7%.2 .9 .9 .3 -1.0 -1.1


Agriculture

Business

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

satisinternet

Total

D 160

Table 117. Overall, I was satisfied with the dorm internet access -- Crosstabualtion by College

78 80 71 3 2 225 45917.0% 17.4% 15.5% .7% .4% 49.0% 100.0%

3.2% 3.3% 2.9% .1% .1% 9.3% 19.0%.2 .0 -.4 -1.6 -1.3 .5

49 56 31 3 6 128 27317.9% 20.5% 11.4% 1.1% 2.2% 46.9% 100.0%

2.0% 2.3% 1.3% .1% .2% 5.3% 11.3%.6 1.2 -2.0 -.6 1.9 -.1

29 24 33 4 2 85 17716.4% 13.6% 18.6% 2.3% 1.1% 48.0% 100.0%

1.2% 1.0% 1.4% .2% .1% 3.5% 7.3%-.1 -1.2 .8 .7 .1 .196 94 99 12 8 247 556

17.3% 16.9% 17.8% 2.2% 1.4% 44.4% 100.0%4.0% 3.9% 4.1% .5% .3% 10.2% 23.0%

.4 -.3 1.0 1.1 .9 -1.05 10 9 2 1 29 56

8.9% 17.9% 16.1% 3.6% 1.8% 51.8% 100.0%.2% .4% .4% .1% .0% 1.2% 2.3%-1.4 .1 .0 1.2 .6 .5

25 29 17 2 1 78 15216.4% 19.1% 11.2% 1.3% .7% 51.3% 100.0%

1.0% 1.2% .7% .1% .0% 3.2% 6.3%.0 .5 -1.5 -.2 -.5 .7

12 11 13 1 0 29 6618.2% 16.7% 19.7% 1.5% .0% 43.9% 100.0%

.5% .5% .5% .0% .0% 1.2% 2.7%.3 -.1 .7 .0 -.8 -.4

401 421 391 38 25 1145 242116.6% 17.4% 16.2% 1.6% 1.0% 47.3% 100.0%16.6% 17.4% 16.2% 1.6% 1.0% 47.3% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

satisinternet

Total

D 161

Table 118. I received good value for my Computer fee -- Crosstabulation by College

30 48 43 14 9 19 16318.4% 29.4% 26.4% 8.6% 5.5% 11.7% 100.0%

1.2% 1.9% 1.7% .5% .3% .7% 6.3%-.9 -1.9 1.1 -.1 .4 6.1

127 226 129 38 22 15 55722.8% 40.6% 23.2% 6.8% 3.9% 2.7% 100.0%

4.9% 8.8% 5.0% 1.5% .9% .6% 21.6%.5 .6 .4 -1.6 -1.0 -.6

128 175 109 40 25 18 49525.9% 35.4% 22.0% 8.1% 5.1% 3.6% 100.0%

5.0% 6.8% 4.2% 1.6% 1.0% .7% 19.2%2.0 -1.3 -.2 -.6 .2 .656 135 64 23 15 2 295

19.0% 45.8% 21.7% 7.8% 5.1% .7% 100.0%2.2% 5.2% 2.5% .9% .6% .1% 11.5%

-1.0 1.9 -.3 -.6 .1 -2.438 72 34 18 15 4 181

21.0% 39.8% 18.8% 9.9% 8.3% 2.2% 100.0%1.5% 2.8% 1.3% .7% .6% .2% 7.0%

-.2 .2 -1.0 .5 2.1 -.7132 230 124 70 27 10 593

22.3% 38.8% 20.9% 11.8% 4.6% 1.7% 100.0%5.1% 8.9% 4.8% 2.7% 1.0% .4% 23.0%

.3 -.1 -.8 2.4 -.4 -2.08 25 13 8 6 1 61

13.1% 41.0% 21.3% 13.1% 9.8% 1.6% 100.0%.3% 1.0% .5% .3% .2% .0% 2.4%-1.4 .3 -.2 1.1 1.7 -.7

20 68 48 11 7 4 15812.7% 43.0% 30.4% 7.0% 4.4% 2.5% 100.0%

.8% 2.6% 1.9% .4% .3% .2% 6.1%-2.4 .8 2.1 -.8 -.3 -.4


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

college


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

goodvalu

Total

D 162

Table 118. I received good value for my Computer fee -- Crosstabulation by College

20 24 12 6 0 8 7028.6% 34.3% 17.1% 8.6% .0% 11.4% 100.0%

.8% .9% .5% .2% .0% .3% 2.7%1.2 -.6 -.9 -.1 -1.9 3.9

559 1003 576 228 126 81 257321.7% 39.0% 22.4% 8.9% 4.9% 3.1% 100.0%21.7% 39.0% 22.4% 8.9% 4.9% 3.1% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total


StronglyDisagree

NotApplicable

goodvalu

Total

Table 119. I used the internet address webmail.usu.edu to read my USU email -- Crosstabulation by College

37 36 29 68 17021.8% 21.2% 17.1% 40.0% 100.0%

1.4% 1.3% 1.1% 2.5% 6.4%4.3 1.3 -.9 -2.161 87 143 289 580

10.5% 15.0% 24.7% 49.8% 100.0%2.3% 3.3% 5.4% 10.8% 21.7%

-.3 -1.2 2.4 -.738 100 101 274 513

7.4% 19.5% 19.7% 53.4% 100.0%1.4% 3.7% 3.8% 10.3% 19.2%

-2.4 1.3 -.2 .533 43 61 164 301

11.0% 14.3% 20.3% 54.5% 100.0%1.2% 1.6% 2.3% 6.1% 11.3%

.0 -1.2 .0 .616 10 47 113 186

8.6% 5.4% 25.3% 60.8% 100.0%.6% .4% 1.8% 4.2% 7.0%

-.9 -3.9 1.6 1.7


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

collegeNever Sometimes

Most ofthe time All of the time

webedu

Total

D 163

Table 119. I used the internet address webmail.usu.edu to read my USU email -- Crosstabulation by College

62 132 104 323 62110.0% 21.3% 16.7% 52.0% 100.0%

2.3% 4.9% 3.9% 12.1% 23.3%-.7 2.5 -1.9 .0

2 4 15 40 613.3% 6.6% 24.6% 65.6% 100.0%

.1% .1% .6% 1.5% 2.3%-1.8 -2.0 .8 1.5

19 26 28 88 16111.8% 16.1% 17.4% 54.7% 100.0%

.7% 1.0% 1.0% 3.3% 6.0%.4 -.3 -.8 .5

22 18 10 25 7529.3% 24.0% 13.3% 33.3% 100.0%

.8% .7% .4% .9% 2.8%4.9 1.4 -1.3 -2.2

290 456 538 1384 266810.9% 17.1% 20.2% 51.9% 100.0%10.9% 17.1% 20.2% 51.9% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

Never SometimesMost ofthe time All of the time

webedu

Total

Table 120. Indicate the number of privately owned computers you had regular access to during the past year -- Crosstabulation by College

23 87 45 15 17013.5% 51.2% 26.5% 8.8% 100.0%

.9% 3.3% 1.7% .6% 6.4%2.7 -.3 -.2 -1.236 284 180 78 578

6.2% 49.1% 31.1% 13.5% 100.0%1.3% 10.6% 6.7% 2.9% 21.7%

-1.3 -1.3 1.8 1.0


Agriculture

Business

collegeNone 1 computer 2 computers 3+ computers

compownTotal

D 164

Table 120. Indicate the number of privately owned computers you had regular access to during the past year -- Crosstabulation by College

38 292 129 55 5147.4% 56.8% 25.1% 10.7% 100.0%1.4% 10.9% 4.8% 2.1% 19.3%

-.2 1.2 -.9 -.921 158 85 36 300

7.0% 52.7% 28.3% 12.0% 100.0%.8% 5.9% 3.2% 1.3% 11.2%

-.4 -.1 .4 .012 106 46 22 186

6.5% 57.0% 24.7% 11.8% 100.0%.4% 4.0% 1.7% .8% 7.0%

-.6 .7 -.6 -.154 337 161 71 623

8.7% 54.1% 25.8% 11.4% 100.0%2.0% 12.6% 6.0% 2.7% 23.4%

.9 .3 -.6 -.56 36 13 6 61

9.8% 59.0% 21.3% 9.8% 100.0%.2% 1.3% .5% .2% 2.3%

.6 .6 -.9 -.512 81 43 25 161

7.5% 50.3% 26.7% 15.5% 100.0%.4% 3.0% 1.6% .9% 6.0%

-.1 -.5 -.1 1.33 36 23 13 75

4.0% 48.0% 30.7% 17.3% 100.0%.1% 1.3% .9% .5% 2.8%-1.2 -.6 .6 1.3205 1417 725 321 2668

7.7% 53.1% 27.2% 12.0% 100.0%7.7% 53.1% 27.2% 12.0% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

None 1 computer 2 computers 3+ computerscompown

Total

D 165

Table 121. If you answered 1 - 3+ computers above, how often did you use this (these) privately owned computer(s)to do your school work -- Crosstabulation by College

1 56 56 26 139.7% 40.3% 40.3% 18.7% 100.0%.0% 2.3% 2.3% 1.1% 5.8%-1.2 1.6 -.3 -1.1

12 169 236 118 5352.2% 31.6% 44.1% 22.1% 100.0%

.5% 7.1% 9.9% 4.9% 22.4%.0 -.5 .8 -.5

10 145 202 100 4572.2% 31.7% 44.2% 21.9% 100.0%

.4% 6.1% 8.4% 4.2% 19.1%-.1 -.4 .8 -.612 99 107 60 278

4.3% 35.6% 38.5% 21.6% 100.0%.5% 4.1% 4.5% 2.5% 11.6%2.3 .8 -.9 -.6

1 49 63 56 169.6% 29.0% 37.3% 33.1% 100.0%.0% 2.0% 2.6% 2.3% 7.1%-1.4 -.9 -.9 2.7

14 178 224 132 5482.6% 32.5% 40.9% 24.1% 100.0%

.6% 7.4% 9.4% 5.5% 22.9%.5 -.1 -.3 .42 23 20 10 55

3.6% 41.8% 36.4% 18.2% 100.0%.1% 1.0% .8% .4% 2.3%

.7 1.2 -.6 -.82 42 62 38 144

1.4% 29.2% 43.1% 26.4% 100.0%.1% 1.8% 2.6% 1.6% 6.0%

-.7 -.8 .2 .8


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science



useownc

Total

D 166

Table 121. If you answered 1 - 3+ computers above, how often did you use this (these) privately owned computer(s)to do your school work -- Crosstabulation by College

0 23 30 15 68.0% 33.8% 44.1% 22.1% 100.0%.0% 1.0% 1.3% .6% 2.8%-1.2 .2 .3 -.2

54 784 1000 555 23932.3% 32.8% 41.8% 23.2% 100.0%2.3% 32.8% 41.8% 23.2% 100.0%


Othercollege

Total


useownc

Total

Table 122. I had regular access during the past year to a USU computer, not in an openaccess lab (e.g., lab for students in a course or in a major) -- Crosstabulation by College

55 113 16832.7% 67.3% 100.0%

2.1% 4.3% 6.3%-2.8 2.6226 350 576

39.2% 60.8% 100.0%8.5% 13.2% 21.7%

-2.9 2.7226 288 514

44.0% 56.0% 100.0%8.5% 10.8% 19.4%

-1.2 1.1184 116 300

61.3% 38.7% 100.0%6.9% 4.4% 11.3%

3.5 -3.371 113 184

38.6% 61.4% 100.0%2.7% 4.3% 6.9%

-1.8 1.7


Agriculture

Business

Education

Engineering

Family Life

collegeYes No

usucompTotal

D 167

Table 122. I had regular access during the past year to a USU computer, not in an openaccess lab (e.g., lab for students in a course or in a major) -- Crosstabulation by College

334 284 61854.0% 46.0% 100.0%12.6% 10.7% 23.3%

2.4 -2.345 16 61

73.8% 26.2% 100.0%1.7% .6% 2.3%

3.0 -2.891 69 160

56.9% 43.1% 100.0%3.4% 2.6% 6.0%

1.7 -1.629 46 75

38.7% 61.3% 100.0%1.1% 1.7% 2.8%

-1.1 1.11261 1395 2656

47.5% 52.5% 100.0%47.5% 52.5% 100.0%


HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total

Yes Nousucomp

Total

Table 123. If you answered yes to the above question, how often did you use this computer to do your school work -- Crosstabulation by College

10 31 13 7 6116.4% 50.8% 21.3% 11.5% 100.0%

.7% 2.3% 1.0% .5% 4.6%.9 -.3 -.7 .8

36 134 62 19 25114.3% 53.4% 24.7% 7.6% 100.0%

2.7% 10.0% 4.6% 1.4% 18.8%.9 .0 -.3 -.6


Agriculture

Business



useusuc

Total

D 168

Table 123. If you answered yes to the above question, how often did you use this computer to do your school work -- Crosstabulation by College

28 138 54 17 23711.8% 58.2% 22.8% 7.2% 100.0%

2.1% 10.3% 4.0% 1.3% 17.7%-.2 1.0 -.8 -.815 107 54 17 193

7.8% 55.4% 28.0% 8.8% 100.0%1.1% 8.0% 4.0% 1.3% 14.4%

-1.8 .4 .7 .117 43 11 6 77

22.1% 55.8% 14.3% 7.8% 100.0%1.3% 3.2% .8% .4% 5.8%

2.5 .3 -2.0 -.238 175 98 38 349

10.9% 50.1% 28.1% 10.9% 100.0%2.8% 13.1% 7.3% 2.8% 26.1%

-.7 -.9 .9 1.51 19 19 6 45

2.2% 42.2% 42.2% 13.3% 100.0%.1% 1.4% 1.4% .4% 3.4%-1.9 -1.0 2.2 1.1

17 55 20 1 9318.3% 59.1% 21.5% 1.1% 100.0%

1.3% 4.1% 1.5% .1% 7.0%1.7 .7 -.8 -2.5

2 14 10 4 306.7% 46.7% 33.3% 13.3% 100.0%

.1% 1.0% .7% .3% 2.2%-.9 -.5 .8 .9

164 716 341 115 133612.3% 53.6% 25.5% 8.6% 100.0%12.3% 53.6% 25.5% 8.6% 100.0%


Education

Engineering

Family Life

HASS

Natural Resources

Science

Other

college

Total


useusuc

Total

D 169

Appendix E

What The USU Advising System Is Doing Well

APPENDIX E - What the USU Advising System Is Doing Well

A great source of information that helps reduce confusion.A lot of information, but your advisor is ready and willing to help and guide in the direction needed.Able to make appointments when needed.Access to student records is easy for advisors.Accommodating the large number of students with few advisors.Accomodating to the extent possible.Actually assigns us a specific advisor, unlike some schools.Acurate information.Advanced standing advisors are doing a good job.Advanced Standing advisors are well advised of the situation and know exactly what I need.Advice is accurate, relevant, and helpful. Advisors are friendly and eager to help.Advisement on campus is helpful, friendly, and knowledgable.advisingAdvising becomes a critical and necessary part of the graduation process. Each of our academic advisors is friendly, knowledgable, and they are always willing to help us along our path to success.Advising in the right directions.Advising me and feeding me.Advising me on the classes I need to take in order to graduate.Advising on graduation.Advising students.Advising.Advising. Very clear info.Advisor always willing to take time with me.Advisor availability.Advisor for my major was great, always willing to help and answer questions.Advisor is there when you have an appointment, secretary is friendly, and the ability to make appointments.Advisor seem to have a sincere interest in helping students structure their class schedules in a manner that will allow the most flexibility.Advisor was very helpful and knowledgable on getting graduation requirements complete.Advisor works in the major and knows the answer to all of my questions about future employment.Advisors are available to help when I needed them.Advisors are caring and flexible.Advisors are easy to contact.Advisors are friendly and easy to talk to. They know how to direct student schedule well.Advisors are helpful and knowledgable.

E - 1

Advisors are knowledgable for what they do.Advisors are knowledgeable of class difficulty and subject focus.Advisors are nice people.Advisors are quite accessible for the most part.Advisors are very nice.Advisors are well informed, helpful.Advisors are well trained in their areas to assist students.Advisors are well trained.Advisors assigned to majors are very knowledable and patient. They also respond within a reasonable amount of time.Advisors at Brigham City and Hyrum Hall have been excellent.Advisors disposition to help.Advisors have been very helpful to me in making my decisions.Advisors help to schedule classes and make students aware of the prerequisite classes that need to be taken ASAP.Advisors know requirements within major.Advisors know their major information.Advisors know their stuff!Advisors seem to care about students. Individualized service.Advisors seem to really care and are helpful.Advisors that help you get in order to graduate.Advisors well informed on university policy and procedures.Advisors were usually well trained and provided good support.After advanced standing they seemed to do everything well.Aiding in planning the best of my schooling and making recommendations of what and when to take certain classes.All advisors are well informed about classes to take.All sheets were clear and self explanatory.All the staff is very friendly and helpful.All.Allowing for each student to know their advisor who can help them organize their college career.Allowing my schedule to work with my counselor's schedule.Allows for quick access.Almost always got an appointment when I needed one.Always able to answer questions. Getting more organized. Able to organize schedule to students needs.Always answers questions I have.Always had my questions answered wellAlways have opportunity to make appointments.Always prepared with your file when you come for an appointment.Always there. Respond quickly, help to solve problems.

E - 2

Answering emails.Answering my questions.Answering questionsAnswering questions about major, grad, practicum, masters, etc.Answering questions and providing handouts.Answering questions.Answering student questions.appointment system was working wellAppointments are easily obtained. Advisors are very nice and answer questions when asked. They are organized and a great resource for concrete answers when you've heard something through the grape-vine.Are usually available for appointments.Are willing to help.As an extension student, they make meeting and helping as easy as possible. Quick responding, knowledgable, very nice.As far as I'm concerned, nothing, but I really disliked my advisor.As far as I know, it informs students well and is easy to get a hold of.As for art majors advisors teach the classes, so it is easy to talk to them. As for academic, not very well. I used my sister who now is an academic advisor at a junior college.Asking for performance evaluations is good.Assigning a specific teacher to help students.Assigning advisors who are too busy to advise students.ASsigning students to advisors and letting them know whom they can go to for help.Assigns an appropriate advisor to each student.Assisting me with classes needed for graduation.At least there's someone to talk to if needed.At the extension, I fell they do an excellent job of helping people gain the information they need in order to succeed.AvailabilityAvailability and willingness to help is great of all the advisors I've personally dealt with.Availability is usually good; I could work with any of the advisors, not just the one I was officially assigned to.Availability.Available often.Available times.Available, informative, complete requirement sheets.Average.Basically everything.Basically, the USU advising system is doing good.

Because I have done the majority of my schooling in Brigham City, I received most of my advising from the faculty there. They do a tremendous job.

E - 3

Being able to tell me what classes to take and helping me with my graduation application.Being active with students.Being available and keeping us exercized sending us to other departments.Being available and prepared.Being available at critical times (i.e. when al semester is about to begin or end.)Being available to all the students.Being available.Being flexible.Being friendly and well informed.Being friendly.Being helpful to any problems.Being helpful, very wiling to answer questions.Being informed, she knows everything.Being open and willing to work with students.Being prepared and helpful.Being there as a reference for people.being there for questions. making advisors accessible.Being there.Being very helpful with graduation and questions relating to major.

Bonnie Pitblado is an excellent advisor and an excellent teacher. I think you shoud stop doing these surveys because they are a waste of time.Both Les Reka and Jeannie Johnson are great!Both the advisors I've had, (Maureen Wagner(CNR)) and (Suzie Stones(HPER)) have been very knowledgeable and willing to help.Brandon has been extremely helpful at making the process more understandable. Brandon exceeds expectations.Bringing advisors to Basin.Business-always friendly and try to accomodate my schedule.Business advisors in BA and MHR are very helpful.By having very well informed and knowledgable advisors (in most cases) so they can answer students questions to help you complete school efficiently without taking unnecessary courses.By helping students when they don't know what to do.By meeting with students and actually helping them.Can get appointments with advisor quickly.Care about students needs.Cares and helps.Caring about the students.Caring for the students, fighting for students rights.Cathy is really on top of things. She gets students applying early for graduation and emails info regarding internships and employment.

E - 4

Cathy is the best advisor I have had. She does an amazing job.Cathy is wonderful! she really helped work things out so I could graduate and enjoy school.Clarifies requirements. Keep students on track for graduation.Clarifying requirements, plenty of hours of bus.Clear directions/expectations.Clear information and easy to follow policy.Communicating their abilities.Communication via email and phone when needed. Since I work in Utah county, it's easier than finding a time to meet in person.Communication what usu requirements are for graduation. Also assessing my needs with appropriate degree.Communication, personal interest.Complete information to questions, frinedly advisors.Computer online information, easily accessable to my advisors and me.Contacting students and giving them information about dates we need to know.Could be better.Could meet with him within a few days of contacting him.Counselors are friendly.Counselors tell you what you need to know.Course work is defined well.Courteous advisors who seem sincere with their help.Courteous.Craig is friendly.Creating requirement sheets.Darcie is doing great! She is well organized and always has the information I need.Darcie is very accurate and prompt. She is also mostly easy to get a hold of.Darcie knows what she is talking about and is very approachable. She did an excellent job helping me whenever I needed her.Dawn is a peer advisor and I could relate to her better than the faculty advisor.

Deaf Ed--Our advisors are involved with us in non-academic setting as well. It's easy to ask informal questions and track them down when needed.Dealing with so many studnets.Deborah Reece is the best.Deborah Reese was extremely helpful and accommodating.Dee Child is an excellent adivsor and always makes time to make sure you get what is needed and are on the right track.Dee Child is excellent. He was always willing to help me.Dee Child is great! The best advisor I've ever had.Dee is a good individual to work withDeloy truly cared about my future. He switched classes to fit what my career goals are.Demonstrating interest in me.

E - 5

Depending on the college it's very helpful in knowing what classes you need.Depends on the department.Derle Thorpe was my advisor. Upon a drop in meeting, he shut the door, took the phone off the hook and advised me for one hour. I felt he genuinely cared for my success.qDetailing what I need.Did away with (advisor name).Didn't meet enough to answer.Didn't really use it.Directing students on all necessary requirements that need to be met for successful completion of their degree and education.Does well letting you know what is needed to graduate.Doing great.Doing their job well, always positive and willing to help.Doing well in helping students know what classes to take.Don't know, I never used it. I didn't know I had a specific advisor so I used faculty in my department for advice.Don't know.Don't really know. I never went to the advisor except to get packet filled out.Donna is great--very knowledgable and helpful, always available.Donna is great. She is organized, helpful, friendly, and I can tell she cares and puts effort into helping her students.Donna Minch is incredible. She made it easy to understand and helped me 110%.Donna Minch is the best thing that has ever happened to USU extensions! She bends over backwards for each and every student.Donna Minch was an excellenct advisorDonna Minch was the best advisor I have ever dealt with.Dr. Allen knows a lot. He is capable of answering most of my questions. He is often available to help me spontaneously, and he is usually ready to help. I have liked all of those who have advised me.Dr. Law is an axcellent advisor and does a great job.Each department seems very knowledgable about what requirements need to be met.Easily able to make an appointment.Easy scheduling.Easy to contact and get information.Easy to make apopintments.Easy to make appts. only several days in advance.Easy to meet with advisors.Easy to meet with and work with.Easy to meet with.Easy to meet with. Personal to my needs.Easy to set up appointments with.Easy to work with from a distance.

E - 6

Educating advisors well.Efficient and friendly.EL ED's advising system is amazing.El. Ed. advisors are always willing to take the time to help.ELED is excellent! If your personal advisor can't answer your questions, they will refer you to another advisor that knows.Email correspondence response time.Email questions and prompt answsers.Emails are informative.Employing David Lancy.Employing Dee Child--He is excellent.Employing Dr. Heap. He's really good.Employing Hyrum Hall.Employing Jana Kay. Sending out emails about individual departments.Employing Marcia Roberts. She's great.Encouraging students and knowing requirements.Encouraging students. Helps get you graduated and out to work.Enough advisors.everythingEverythingEverything I experienced wtih USU advising was positive.Everything is good.Everything is great.Everything wtih my advisors have been great.Everything!Everything! It was great!Everything! My advisor wsa reachable by appointment, phone, and email.Everything! Susie is wonderful and has helped me with everything.Everything.Everything. I've had no problems.Everything. I can always get the info and answers to questions whenever I need to. Without the great help of my advisor, everything from registration to graduation would be much more difficult.Everything. My advisor made the whole process seem easy.Everything. The system is very helpful and my advisor did all she could to help me follow a path I wanted.Excellent advising. They helped me when I was applying further for a masters and what schools would be good.Excellent in having assistant advisors always available. This makes it convenient and fast.Explaining requirements and especially internship stuff wellExplainint courses needed for general education.

E - 7

fairly well from what I've needed.Finding classes and doing paper work for grad.Flexible scheduling including walk-ins.Flexible with student schedules.Following the major requirement sheets exactly.Following through on paperwork.For me it was the availability of my advisor.Formal assignment of an advisor.FriendlyFriendly advice, on the ball service, they work hard to make sure each student is taken care of.Friendly advising.Friendly advisors.Friendly advisors. Easy to talk to and willing to help explore every option.Friendly and accomodating; well organized.Friendly and courteous.Friendly and efficient.Friendly and organized.Friendly Atmosphere.Friendly HASS staff.Friendly helpful staff.Friendly once you get in the door.Friendly service.Friendly with students.Friendly, helpful advisors.Friendly, helpful people.Friendly, helpful, and encouraging!Friendly, helpful.Friendly, informative when approached.Friendly, informative, helpful.Friendly, know what they are talking about.Friendly, listens well to needs and wants.Friendly, mostly helpful, keeps accurate records.Friendly, trying to help if they can.Friendly.Friendly. I want Marsha to get a raise. She has helped me every step of the way.

From my first semester at USU, I knew exactly what classes were needed for my major. It was nice to have a plan of classes from the start.

E - 8

From my point of view, nothing.Gave me good information and willing to help.General advisors are good and help to minimize classes.General Ed. advising in HASS. However, extra bureaeracy could cause more problems than solve in the future.Generally advisors are friendly and accessible.Get me into the classes I needed.Getting everything done.Getting everything ready for graduation.Getting information out about career fairs.Getting me an appointment in a short amount of time.Getting me in and out.Getting more advisors. A new one was just assigned to our department.Getting my papers signed.Getting paid well.Getting people done.Getting people graduated.Getting people in and out quickly.getting rid of Janet Karren. I am graduating late due to her incompetence!Getting rid of Madeline Thimmes.Getting students graduated.Getting students into the appropriate classes, giving advice on electives.Getting students into the classes at the right time.Getting the information to me.Getting you to meet the schools requirements.Getting your schedule figure out. Helping with intern and other activities.Give good academic advice.Give us the information that we need and the materials.Give valuable information concerning requirements for graduation. Help in decision making.Gives great advice on classes to take.gives us information we needgiving a route for students to followGiving a sheet that spells out what classes are needed to graduate.Giving a source of guidance.Giving advice.Giving an opportunity to receive advising.Giving appropriate info and keeping student on track.Giving clear and concise information concerning graduation requirements.

E - 9

Giving correct information, knowledgable.Giving full information on what is required to graduate.Giving good advice for students to progress through their major.Giving good info on career paths to students.Giving guidance to students on what they need to do in order to graudate.Giving instruction on how to get through the quickest and most efficient way.Giving me information.Giving opportunities for walk in appointments.Giving sound advice. I don't need to go in as often because I had all my questions answered the first time.Giving students all information on various options available in program or related programs.Giving students detailed information.Giving students reassurance they are taking the right classes.Giving students the prerequisites for the University of Utah, no other school.Giving us the major requirement sheets so we can plan our own schedulesGiving us the requirement sheets.Going out to extension services.Good advice, encouraged visit with advisor, semester reminder cards in the mail.Good advice.Good advising.Good advisorsGood advisors usually know what they are talking about.Good advisors, Ruth Harrison and Ron Godfrey were both really great to work wtih.Good advisors.Good appointment times.Good as is.Good at answering questions/concerns.Good at getting a hold of and answering specific questions about my major.Good at keeping appointments.Good at making time, completing paper work quickly, available to help students during office hours.Good at meeting individually with students.Good availability to students.Good availability.Good directional information on what classes to take.Good email contact.Good help.Good information.Good insight, knowledgable, friendly, willing to help.

E - 10

Good knowledge.Good major requirement sheets.Good major requirements sheets.good organizationGood Peer Advisors.Good question.Good staff and requirement sheets.Good staff.Good things.Good to answer questions over phone so I didn't always have to go in.Good, give good information when I need it.Good, personable people.Good.Got me in the classes I needed helped change major.Got me through.greatGreat at helping whenever needed, and really nice about it. Very informative.Great help when you can get an appointment.Great outlines, open availability.Great secretaries.Great.Grouping you with a particular advisor that you stay with your college career.Guidance on what classes to take. Friendly, helpful.Guiding me in what classes I need to take to graduate in a timely mannerGuiding students to their ultimate goals.Has a good accounting advisor in Frank Schuman.Has good advisors like Dr. Allen.HASS advising center has very hard working employers and advisors that are very accommodating.HASS advising office is great. They work well and are knowledgable about my major and program requirements. They let me know exactly what I need to do and inform me of my options.HASS advising was great. My advisor there was wonderful.HASS advisors were all aware of and integrated well with other colleges.HASS is excellent, easy to work with, and everyone is very friendly and try to be available.HASS is great. Engineering is rude!Have lots of information on the website, so you can plan a lot alone.Have scheduled lists.Have well mapped and planned semester schedules and advisors are easy to get a hold of and meet with.

E - 11

Having a lot of available times to meet.Having advisors from campus come to the extension.Having information available about graduation requirements.Having information I need in the office and expalining it to me.Having Julie Wheller as a former advisor in this area. She was awesome and I appreciated her love for her students and her response time to emails, phone calls were wonderful (usually same day!). Give her a raise.Having Kathy Bayn as the undergraduate advisor for college of Engineering.Having lots of times to meet with advisor.Having major requirement sheets available. Notifying me when my advisor changed.Having major requirement sheets.Having Mary Leavitt thereHaving my individual advisor listed on the QUAD once I log in.Having peer advisors as well as advisors. You get it at a student perspective who has actually taken most classes, as well as someone who knows the overall picture.Having peer tutors responding to email.Having people.Having plenty of advisors.Having staff member assigned in the department to deal specifically with the advising of students.Having students meet with advisors.Having the advisor be in the same field or major as the student.Having the major requirement sheets available.He is very efficient. I received all my necessary information and all my questions were answered.He seems very interested and helpful in what I am doing.He was very helpful and answered email questions in a timely manner.Help check classes.Help decrease the run around and paperwork. Serve well as student advocate.Help me take the right classes and see why.Help me understand the classes I need to take.Help plan ahead to finish in the desired amount of time.Help students plan their time to schedule on time in the right field.Helped me figure out how to use my previous schooling to the best of my advantage.Helped me in transferring credits and knowing what remained that needed to be accomplished.Helped me register.Helped me stay on track by indicating what classes would help me finish my degree in the shortest time by not taking unneeded classes.Helped me understand what I need to get done to graduate.Helpful advisor.Helpful and available.

E - 12

Helpful and efficient.Helpful and reasonable in helping me meet requirements.Helpful in giving different choices to graduate.Helpful in signing people into classes that are needed.Helpful with letting me know the requirements I need.Helping people know what they need to take.Helping direct in paperwork processesHelping get classes lined up.helping graduate on timehelping high school kids get a good startHelping in providing a plan of action for college career.Helping kids obtain focus.Helping me choose the right classes to meet my associate needs while covering my bases for future bachelor needs.Helping me evaluate the classes I am taking.Helping me finish.Helping me get into the right classes.Helping me graduate on time.Helping me plan my course of study.Helping me to know what classes I need to graduate and learn what I want to focus on.Helping me to obtain my degree.Helping me to see what needs to be done to graduate.Helping me with paperwork to be turned in timely. Also makes sure I am on the right track to graduate.Helping out with problems when needed to the best of their ability.Helping out with registration.Helping people out to make sure they graduate.Helping studentsHelping students achieve goals.Helping students change requirements as quickly as possible.Helping students find the fastest, cheapest way through their education.Helping students fulfill obligations who are not on campus.Helping students graduate quickly.Helping students graduate.Helping students graduate. Great teachers!Helping students jump through all the necessary hoops to graduate.Helping students know what classes to take and when.Helping students make their school schedule by not having to do it themselves.Helping students plan.

E - 13

Helping students stay on track while working toward graduation.Helping students that can't plan for themselves.Helping students to achieve their goals.Helping students to know what classes to take. The major sheets are helpful.Helping students to navigate through to graduation.Helping students to plan their career.Helping students with problemsHelping the student meet their academic needs.Helping to figure out individual semester class schedules.Helping to get a degree.Helping to make sure that we take all our classes in order to graduate.Helping when asked. Resolving questions and concerns.Helping with career options.Helping with requireed classes and getting you into the ones necessary to graduate.Helping with schedules.Helps anyone that needs it whenever they need it.Helps me see the things I miss in General Ed.Helps students customize curriculum at either institutions (off campus USU).Helps the student plan for future semesters.Helps to specifiy the classes that we need.Helps you know what options you have for coursework.High quality, knowledgable advisors.Hiring capable counselors that care about the students.Hiring competent people.Hiring good people.Hiring knowledgeable people.Hiring more people.Hiring people like my advisor.Hiring people like Ronnie Green.Hiring people like Vicki Allan and Myra Cook. They bend over backward to help whenever they can.Honestly, not much. My advisor didn't know some of the basic requirements for Depth Education and what courses I needed. I went to Marsha (Art Dept. secretary) for a lot and also went to Tom Toone if I had an issue about classes in art.Huh?!?Hyrum Hall was very timely about returning emails and was understanding of each personal situation regarding classes.Hyrum is good at letting me know what classes I need. Sometime he made me feel not very smart.Hyrum is very accessible and a great communicator.Hyrum is wonderful in responding to questions.

E - 14

Hyrum worked on making sure I had all of my credits and sent me information as needed.I'm not sure they are "doing" anything.

I've had two advisors, Kathy Bayn and Debrah Reece. Debrah Reece was great, always available even for drop ins. Kathy had a difficult schedule.I've noticed good efforts to combine students with advisors.II always can make an appointment.I always know exactly what classes I'm going to take and things that I need to do like graduation application, grammar exam, etc.I am a distance Ed. Student. Therefore I meet with my advisor over email. I've never had a problem with her. Tressa has helped me well.I am always able to communicate with my advisor.

I am at a branch campus. In my major they are doing well. My husband's major it would be nice if he could meet with an advisor more often.I am happy with all of it.I am lucky to be in the college of agriculture because we have great advisors and they take the time to help.I appreciate how quickly my advisor gets back to me when I need her!

I appreciated the ability to communicate with my advisor via email and conference calls. Psychology department advisors have been great.I believe teachers should do the advising.I can't say because I only met with my advisor once.I can't speak for the entire system, but Sylvia keeps us well informed by mail and through periodic visits to the Price site.I can't think of anything because my experience hasn't been entirely positive.I can always contact my advisor. She is always helpful. Found who my advisor was quite easily.I can get the info I need but not from my advisor.I can normally meet with my advisor pretty easily.I can only speak for the PSB dept. They are excellent at keeping students informed of opportunities. They also actually know my name.I can reach my advisor at any time.I can rely on them to keep me on the path to graduation.I could ask questions and get responses by email.I could contact Josh if I had any questions, he would answer them promptly.I couldn't tell you of any.I did an interdisciplinary major. My advisor did pretty much everything for me and made it very easy.I didn't really have a specific assigned advisor. I just asked Randy the most questions.I didn't use it much. I don't know. They seemed nice when I picked up my packet.I don't believe I can answer this. I was NOT pleased with the advising system.I don't have to wait long to see my advisor. My advisor is easy to talk to.I don't know about other advisors, but Darcie went out of her way to be available and she was very pleasant and helpful.I don't know about the rest of the system, but my advisor was a great help.

E - 15

I don't know about USU as a whole, but my advisor has a wonderful system. No complaints.I don't know what USU is doing well, but my advisor Bonnie Glass-Coffin knows what she is doing and is an excellent advisor and person. KNow how to treat the students.I don't know.I don't really know, I'm still in High School. I have not had an actual advisor. I ask Josh Hunter questions every once in awhile, but have never met him in person. I also speak to my high school counselor John Jaussi.I don't think the advising system is doing anything "very well." I got lucky when I got my advisor Ruth because she knows her stuff and cared for my future.I enjoyed talking to the student advisors--always very friendly and helpful.I enjoyed the major requirement sheets.I feel like my advisor was very accessible and helpful.I feel like teachers/advisors in my major care about my success.I feel that college of NR has assigned adequate advisors and also have an awesome academic advising center.

I feel that I get answers that are clear and easy to understand to the questions I ask. I've always been informed on importnat issues and deadlines.I feel that my advisor is getting people started and continuing on the right track to get through school quickly and happily.I feel that my advisor was well informed and on tp of things and was thus able to help me with my questins and concerns.I felt she knew and remembered my conditions. She was very well educated.I felt that the advisors were able to help me because they were familiar with the classes offered.I felt very important and listened to. She calmed me and made me assured about my decision.

I find it helpful to receive emails about upcoming events, and I also appreciated the effort Darcie has made by visiting our classes to talk to students.I got mostly what I needed on first visit, very helpful.I guess giving advice. I know that I have gathered good advice from my advisor.I guess they are always willing to help.I had a bad experience and can not comment.I had a wonderful advisor. She was always available and willing to help.I have 3 advisors. One for History, Anthropology, and Gen. Ed. And they are all great, especially General Education.I have a great advisor.I have a wonderful advisor!I have always been able to get an appointment with my advisor at least one day in advance.I have always had great advisors who made sure I was heading in the right direction for graduation. Some have become good friends.I have been really happy with my advisor. He is well informed and has been very helpful.I have been really pleased wtih the suggestions that they have given me as well as giving me options and deadlines that are coming up.I have easy access to my advisor.I have had a great advisor/friend. Supportive, good advice.I have had a positive experience.

E - 16

I have had a wonderful experience.I have had no advising problems, and I get my information from the Engineering secretary.I have had only good advisors who are well-informed and willing to help out.I have not been impressed at all with the advising system.I have really liked all of my advisors. Mary Leavitt, Sally Peterson, and Jana Kay Lunstad area all great. If all of the advisors in other departments were like them, then they would be in good shape.I have talked to advisors in other colleges and no one really took the time to give me information or help. Cathy Myer Roche was the first person and only who has pulled me through.I haven't ever had any problems coming in and getting help. All the advisors in the psych office have been excellent.I haven't had any problems.I haven't met enough times to know. My advisor seems to be pretty personable.I just think Isabel Roskelley is great. She really knows her stuff. She is quick and efficient. When I come in, I prefer to speak with her.I knew what classes I needed to take.I like having the requirement sheets as a guide.I like how specific she was. She gave me the course numbers I needed. It was very helpful.I like how they helped me in figuring out when and what classes I need to take to graduate in advance so registration was easier.I like how they keep track of the classes I still need to take and how they are always so willing to help me get into the classes I need.I like Jan Lyons.I like Myra.I like receiving emails promptly when I have a question. Sylvia is really good at getting back to me quickly! When I call her on the phone, she never hurries me or makes me feel that I am taking too much of her time.I like that I am able to email my advisor and get quick responses.I like that my advisor can plan my schedule for me and print me out a copy. It helps me to see it on paper.I like that my department moved to a single full-time advisor rather than many faculty who often don't have much time.I like that they're a little flexible when needed, and they write down and make sure I know what I need and email me about deadlines.

I like that they are organized and know where students need to focus their time. They are good about reminding you of your requirements.I like the advising system. I like that it is the responsibility of the student to visit with the advisor.I like the available website.I like the fact that I was assigned to an advisor in my major, that helped.I like the major requirement sheets.I like the people in the HASS office, especially Penny.I like the requirement sheets.I liked everything about CNR advising.

I liked how the advisor came into our classes to tell us about upcoming events. Darcie would meet with me even before I was officially in the major.I liked my advisor. He had good information.

E - 17

I liked the quick responses to email questions.I liked to meet with the peer advisor. They were very excited and helpful.I love how small and personal my advising office is. My advisor has become a mentor and friend.I love my advisor. she is on the ball, always knows what is going on, and is overall very helpful.I love my advisor. She is so friendly and helpful and always willing and able to answer any questions I have.I love my counselor. He is extremely helpful.I love the sheets.I lucked out. I got a great advisor in Dr. Furlong and a gernal advisor in Sally Peterson. They both cared about me a great deal and did whatever they could within their means to help. If it wasn't for them, I would have given up on USU a long time agI never really used it, so I don't know.I never went so I don't know.I only visited them once. Don't know.I really appreciate the advisors in the HASS dept. for general education requirement purposes.I really appreciate the willingness of my advisor to help out when asked.I really like everything about the advising system.I really like Jana Kay. She's a great fountain of knowledge. She's the only touch I have with the advising system.I really like my advisor. She is very helpful.I really liked Suzi. She was very helpful.I really liked working with Marianne Rich. She helped me so much more than my advisor!I think in economics, the advisors are doing a good jobI think it's good that beginning students are required to see an advisor before they register. Then they get started right.I think it is a good idea to have two advisors, one for general ed and one for those closer to graduation.I think my advisor has helped me out all around.I think so. Very personable and knowledgable of the real world.I think the advisors are wonderful. They know what they are talking about and they have helped me a ton.I think they are doing a great job of being friendly and helpful.I think they are very informative.I think they try.I think, overall, people are available to talk to with adequite planning.I thought both Marylon Reynolds and Susie Stones were great advisors and did all they could go help me.I thought it was great.I thought Prof. Schuman was great. I had some concerns as to which major to go after and he was extremely helpful.I thought the major requirement sheets wer every clear and easy to follow.I was able to get the appointment when I needed it.I was able to meet with my advisor when I needed to. I could even pop in.

I was actually very satisfied with my advisor. I felt she gave me more than the necessary effort every time I went for my scheduling and graduation.

E - 18

I was always able to meet with them and they were nice and polite.I was always able to schedule a time to meet with my advisor. She knew what I needed to do and kept me on track.I was very pleased. I always knew it would help me in my decisions. This is the only school of the four I attended where I felt I was getting real direction.I worked with Brian Evans and he was excellent. He was a good friend.I worked with the College of HASS advising when preparing for graduation and I was surprised how many different (sometimes incorrect) answers I received from different staff members in HASS. I also had my deficient credits calculated wrong as well; veryI would like my advisor to have more influence over what classes I need.I wouldn't know since I didn't even know I had an advisor.If the career services staff are considered part of this system, then I commend them. They went out of their way to inform students of things they need to do in order to prepare for a career or internship.If you ask questions you get answers you need, quickly and accurately.In all seriousness, please study the HASS advising center, especially Mary Leavitt and Lynne, Sally. They are PRIME examples of what advisors should be. I've worked there and see how different they are from other advisors on campus.

In ASTE Dept. advising is great with a lot of help. When I was trying to go into Ag. Business, not only was it not helpful, it was impossible.In CS department they hired a full time advisor--that helped out tons. Everyone should do that.In helping and orienting students with their heirarchial courses and with other related needs.In my case, I was always able to talk to my advisor even with short notice.In my major the student advisor ratio is perfect. The department is small.In some schools you have a teacher who is designated to help advising students.In the COB, the student service center is a failed system with seriously overwhelming flaws. I have never seen or have had to work with an institution that was so unprofessional, incompetent, and apathetic towards its patrons.In the college of agriculture, I can drop in and visit my advisor any time. I took the right classes to get through quickly.In the college of business, the advisors do a great job of helping students plan for future schedules.In the college of engineering they are professional and generally know what they are talking about.

In the education department the advisors do all they can to ensure the students graduate in as few years as possible and are available regularly.In the music dept. I can't say that they have done very well until just recently. I was often very discouraged and lost.Inform me.Information available on sheets is good.Informed advisors. They know the requirements and options well.Informing accurately on classes.Informing of Dates to Apply.Informing students of future class scheduling, helps with future planning.Informing the students of new deadlines and procedures.Informing their advisors on what the students need.

E - 19

Informing us what is going on so we aren't left in the dark.Informing USU's requirements and complying with USU's policies.Instructing students to pay close attention to their grades.Insuring that students know what they need to do to graduate.Interpreting the ins and outs of department objectives and requirements for degrees.Isabel Roskelly was very helpful and extremely nice. She was very willing to help.It's all good.It's available if you need it.It's available.It's doing okay.It's easy to meet with Kathy Bayne (but busy).It's easy to schedule appointments.It's efficient, the advisors know how to help, and they know the ins and outs of the university.It's fine.It's good because I never had advising system in Japan.It's great.It's keeping me on track making sure I'm donig all the things I need to be doing.It's okay.It's pretty accessible. Get's you what you need.It's ready available and easy to get information on.It's there.It does well.It exists.It gives me better judgement on what classes I should take. The advisor points out the better way to finish my degree.It has advisors.It has helped me to get the credits and know what credits I need.It has kept me on track.It helped me plan my future.It helpls to know exactly who your advisor is instead of working with different faculty each time.It helps me to make better decisions on what classes I should take.It helps to get you through quicker and provides comfort in knowing that you are doing okay and keeping on pace.It is a good source to utilize when planning in regards to education and future goals.It is easy to contact advisors.It is easy to get an appointment and the direction given is good.It is good to have an adviosr assigned to you.It is good to talk with advisor personally.It is helping me to get all of my stuff ready for college.

E - 20

It is informative for the most part.It is liberal in its approach.It is nice there are people there to help you with your academic planning.It is nice to have multiple advisors and lots of available times.It is OK. Keep it up.It is Okay. My advisor has on various occasions been rude and rushed me out of his office.It is personal, and it has helped me take the classes I need.

It is there for the people who need it. I just looked at the major req. sheet and knew how to plan my experience at USU. Many don't or can't do this.It is there for the students to helps to answer questions.It is very easy to get an appointment. They have flexible hours and are there for us.It is very easy to meet with peer advisor. She has all of the answers to my questions.It is very efficient with appointments. Makes them quick and to the point.It lets me know what I need to do to get a somewhat superficial degree.It provides the standard way to get through the program. It is pretty easy to get into.It takes the time to work with the students that seek help.It uses professors familiar with the classes, staff, faculty, and career field.It was always easy to make an appointment to see my advisor.It was fairly easy to schedule an appointment.It was very helpful in all academic aspects.Its job. I was well advised.Jan Lyons is an excellent advisor! She is very helpful and knowledgable when I have questions.Jan Lyons is great. Some of the advisors that you deal with prior to obtaining advanced standing were less helpful, but they deal with more students.Jana Kay is great. She has helped me plan my schedule each semester and answers all of my questions.Jana Kay is incredible. She knows her students as well as the courses. Brilliant.Jana Kay is very well informed and she was always able to help me when it seemed nothing could be done.Jana Kay keeps her advisees well informed about changes to the program, about English Dept. activities, and about career opportunities.Jana Kay told me exactly what was going on all the time.Jana Kay was great but my history advisor was horrible. Every time I went in it was someone different and they were almost never helpful.Jana Kay was well prepared and very helpful.Jana Kay went beyond the call of duty when I was transferring to USU, but then continued to do so throughout my USU experience!Jana Kay. She's doing everything well. She has been extremely helpful and I have no complaints about her.Jim Cangelosi really cares about students; he does a great job.Jim knew exactly what he was doing. He helped a lot.Joan Smith helped to advise me. She did a great job!John Neely is the best.

E - 21

John was very helpful.Josh Hunter was very informative and would work wtih me to get things worked out.Julie was great. No problems.Just about everything.Just that--advising.

Karen gave USU the institution a friendly face. When I was flustered she was calm. She dropped everything to help me. She's a problem-solver.Karen Ranson has been great. Thanks!Karen was wonderful in responding to email and helping me plan and really acted interested in what I was doing.Kathy Bain is an excellent advisor. she is extremely knowledgable and very helpful.Kathy Bayn does a great job for the college of engineering.Kathy Bayn is great and saved my life for graduation.Kathy Bayn is very experienced and extremely capable (but only on undergraduate matters).Kathy Bayne is well informed and knows how to help.Kathy is a good person to talk to, she was more my advisor than (faculty name).Kathy is amazingly helpful no matter what question you ask her. She always takes time to try and help.Kathy knows her stuff.Kathy really knows her stuff.Kathy was also well informed and could answer all my questions.Keep appointment books well for students.Keep appointments.Keep student files and copies of class plans on hand if I need them.Keep students informed about depth and bredth courses that have to be taken.Keep the major sheets coming, updated.Keeping current on changing graduation requirements.Keeping informed on classes needed for graduation.Keeping kids on track.Keeping Marcia employed.Keeping me informed and helping me enroll in classes I need.Keeping me informed and progressing.Keeping me informed of things I need to complete.Keeping me informed on the classes I'm in need of to graduate.Keeping me informed on what I need to be doing to finish. Very helpful when I'm confused.Keeping me informed.Keeping me informed. Working with my schedule.Keeping me on task, motivating.Keeping me on track with what classes I need to be taking and when to take them.

E - 22

Keeping me on track.Keeping me updated on changes in program.Keeping my record updated. Keeping appointments.Keeping on top of things. My emails were always responded to promptly and my questions were always answered.Keeping Sally Peterson on board!Keeping student on track of requirements to graduate.Keeping students advised on what classes are required for graduation.Keeping students informed concerning major requirements.Keeping students informed of options and working with them to help them graduate. Very knowledgeable.Keeping students on track and what classes are needed to be taken.Keeping students on track for graduation.Keeping students updated, helping with 4 year plans.Keeping students well informed and having friendly and cooperative advisors.Keeping students well informed with graduating status.Keeping the student-teacher association going.Keeping the students informed as to what papers are needed to be completed for deadlines. Very helpful!Keeping us informed and major requirement sheets and websites help a great deal.Keeping us informed.Keeping us on track for graduation.Keeping us on track.Keeping us on track. Indicate right courses and professors.Keeps in contact with students and is always willing to help.Kind and accurate advising.Knew what was required and which classes not to take together because it was a lot of work.Know the classes you must take.Knowing me as a person.Knowing the requirements for graduation, pre-reqs etc.Knowing what classes need to be taken for graduation.Knowing what classes we need to take for our major.Knowledgable about questions asked.Knowledgable about the requirements and what you need to graduate.Knowledgable people.Knowledgable.Knowledge of available class schedules.knowledgeableKnows the students and takes time to insure student's need are met.Leads the student well when needed.

E - 23

Less obstacles to meet the advisor.Let me know and will keep me informed through email if necessary what I need to do to graduate.Let us know what we need to do.Let you know what you need.Letting me graduate.Letting me know my options.Letting me know which classes to take.Letting students know exactly what classes we need to take.Letting students know they are willing to help.Letting students know what needs to happen to get classes done and register for classes.Letting the students feel more comfortable and confident.Letting us know which class requirements we need.Letting you know they're available and there to help.Letting you know what needs to be done to graduate on time.Listening.Listens and responds well person to person.Lots of advisors.Lynn is very accessible and has information I need to graduate.Lynne Slade is awesome! If every advisor was as good as she is, there wouldn't be any problems.Made the information available elsewhere (online, major requirement sheets, catalog, etc.)Madeline Thimer has been exceptional in how well she helped me in getting what I needed to graduate.Madeline Thimmes kept me informed well by phone when things changed. Jan Lyons is new but is also doing the same. Always willing to help when I visit her.Major requirement sheets are excellent.Major requirement sheets are helpful.Major requirement sheets on the internet are helpful.Major requirement sheets provide organization to class schedules.Major requirement sheets useful, allows students to ask informed questions, be more prepared when meeting advisor.Major requirement sheets.Major sheets are good, easy to understand.Make sure I have the classes I neededMake sure I take the right classes.Makes application easy.Makes appointments easily.Makes me feel important and helps me make realistic goals.Makes time so that every student can see their advisor.Making a detailed schedule that is mapped out towards my graduation and always willing to help.

E - 24

Making advisors readily available, for the most part.Making appointment times available and planning out 4 year plan.Making appointments is easy.Making appointments, making schedules.Making available resources for students to plan academic path.Making documents available so students know what is expected.Making it easier to graduate.Making it easy to contact advisor.Making it quick and easy to meet with advisor.Making major requirement sheets.Making me come back many times and sending me all over campus.Making more advisors available.Making students feel important. Having a large amount of advisors.Making students fend for themselves.Making students stay longer in school.Making sure all graduation requirements are met.Making sure all students are aware that they should meet with their advisor (not all colleges help with planning class schedules).Making sure graduation requirements are metMaking sure I graduate when I need to.Making sure I have access to them. Very attentive and helpful. Encouraging.Making sure I have everything I need to graduate.Making sure I take the right classes.Making sure students are on time and ready for graduation, ie getting applications completed, making sure requirements are met.Making sure students have the right credits/classes.Making sure students meet the requirements.Making sure that we do what we need to to graduate.Making sure there are enough advisors.Making sure we're on the right track.Making sure we know what to do.Making sure you are aking the right classes for your graduation and helping to decide which classes to take each semester.Making the information available. Fixing registration flags promptly.Making the students feel welcome.Making themselves available to make an appointment.Making time even when not during office hours.Many things.Marcia in the art department office is doing a fantastic job and is very flexible wtih students.Marcia Roberts was 100% willing to get me where I needed to go with as few hoops to jump through as possible.

E - 25

Marcia was great because she knows the classes, the system and really wanted to help me.

Marcia was very upfront about everything and didn't dance around what needed to be done. Plus she was very knowledgable about everything.Marilyn is a wonderful help. I like how the advising system gives you a lay out of semesters and how to graduate.Marlo is awesome. Becky is too.Marriane is always prepared when I see and has been very helpful.Marsha in art department is ideal!Mary has been the ONLY helpful advisor I've had. She seems to be genuinely interested in helping students.Mary is extremely helpful and the nicest lady on campus.Mary is just very personable.Mary Leavitt and Dr. Galderisi, that's about it. They are great. The general advisors I met with in my first two years were a waste.Mary Leavitt is great.Mary Leavitt is so nice and helpful. She made me her number one concern. She cared about my situation and she's sweet.Mary Leavitt is wonderful. She was always kind, patient, and knowledgable about the system.Mary Leavitt was very helpful to me. I like the new walk in only program on the busy weeks.Mary Levitt is great! I loved working with her. I felt like she really cared.Maureen is the main advisor, I just never went to her because most advisors in the Fish and Wildlife Dept., my previous major, did not help at all and were negative impacts on my school career.Maureen Wagner is extremely helpful. ENVS 1790 did a great job of getting me involved with my advisor and other available resources.Meet any time with advisors.Meeting deadlines, advising of requirements, meeting students.Meeting the students needs.Meeting with nancy was great. The HASS advising was a little sketchy and troublesome.Meeting with students.Meeting with the students when they make appointments.Meets students needs.Mo Minch always returns calls and makes every effort to meet the needs of the students.More advisors have been hired on recently.Most advisors are available often so it's easy to meet with them.Most advisors are doing well. They are helpful and accessible.Most counselors care and work hard to help their students.Most of the advisors did not mind meeting with students.Most of the faculty I talked to were frequently available to answer students' questions.Most of the general things.Moving a lot of people through the system very quickly.My advisor always accessed and printed my information before I came so he was ready to help me when I arrived. He kept me aware of what I needed for graduation.

E - 26

My advisor always got the information I needed in a timely manner.My advisor always has the information I need and keeps me on track for graduation.My advisor always responded quickly to my emails. That is important because I depend on email.My advisor always returns my calls and makes sure I have all applications in on time.My advisor always seems prepared for my particular situation every time I come in.My advisor always tells me correct information. I can talk to her when I need to. She knows who I am.

My advisor and the other advisors in the office went above and beyond the call of duty. I wish there was some way I could adequately thank them.My advisor answered my questions promptly and efficiently when I emailed her. That was very helpful.My advisor at the college of education is great, but the advisors at the college of business stink. I ended up taking at least 12 extra credits because of them. They neecd to know what the hell they are doing.My advisor cared about my future. She patrently answered all my questionsMy advisor cares about and knokws students. She's great.My advisor cares about the students and does her best to help us out.My advisor clearly outlined the classes and course I needed to take which was extremely helpful. It helped me gain a lot of trust in USU.My advisor did a good job at making me feel confident and always telling me and leading me in the right direction.My advisor did very well to help me know the things I needed to complete in order to graduate.My advisor had a good outline.My advisor had excellent experience and was able to give relevant advice, especially towards career goals.My advisor had my four year plan already designed. All I had to do was register for my classes. It was great.My advisor has a great, open attitude, very frank and easy to talk to.My advisor has a student advisor that does a great job. Penny was available at any time for walk-ins.My advisor has always been available and willing to help/explain.My advisor has always been pretty good at getting back with me quickly when I call or email.My advisor has been amazing, I have nothing I think needs to be changed!My advisor has been there when I have made the effort to seek her out.My advisor has done a wonderful job getting to know mw, helping me find internships, letting me know about conferences related to my major, etc...Dave is awesome!My advisor has helped me plan my semesters to graduate.My advisor helped me know what I needed to graduate when I wanted. She was very helpful.My advisor helped me with any questions or concerns I had.My advisor in elementary education was wonderful.My advisor is a social worker, so of course she's going to be good at what she does.My advisor is available and friendly and very helpfulMy advisor is excellent--very available, diligent, personable, and helpful.My advisor is friendly and works to help me out in finishing my degree with me in mind.My advisor is good. She's been trained well.

E - 27

My advisor is great! She's always helping me stay a step ahead of things.My advisor is great.My advisor is great. He is always willing to meet with me.My advisor is great. She is a good listener, has in-depth experience, and gets things done.My advisor is great. she is very knowledgable and seems to really care about my education.My advisor is my piano teacher, so I met with him once a week. I"m able to ask him questions whenever.My advisor is very helpful, easy to talk with, and she knows her stuff.My advisor is very knowledgable, efficient, and positive. She does everything to help me figure things out.My advisor is very organized and really knows what she is doing. I appreciated her graciousness and accuracy.My advisor is very personable. She's been very helpful and approachable over the years.My advisor is very well capasitated. She works wtih me and cares. She is waht USU is doing well.My advisor is very well informed and is interested in my academic success.My advisor is well informed as well as willing to research any questions I may have.My advisor is well prepared each time I meet with her. She also knows me on a personal level.

My advisor is wonderful. She lets me know all the information and also what she thinks, but I get to make my own decision based on what's given.My advisor knew my name and he helped me graduate.My advisor knew very well what classes I needed to take and helped me plan my schedule well.My advisor knew what he was doing.My advisor knows all of the requirements very well and she's good at helping me plan my schedules.My advisor knows her job well, is efficient and timely. My appointments with her were never wasted.My advisor knows her stuff.My advisor knows really well about everything. I was helped a lot when I decided my future. Also, she encouraged me to study hard, which made me have a chance to go to graduate school.My advisor knows what she's saying and advising me to do.My advisor knows what she is talking about when discussing my major.My advisor let me know what I needed to take and which classes would be beneficial.My advisor listens to my needs and trys her best to meet them and push me along.My advisor really cares about students.My advisor really helped out when I had a scheduling conflict.My advisor really knows what I need to graduate. Knows the classes and made great recommendations on how one class prepares a student for another class.My advisor seemed very competent and friendly. She never seemed to mind meeting with me.My advisor seems to sincerely want to help me succeed. she is honest with the possibilities and goes the extra mile every time to help me in any way.My advisor understood necessary requirements for major and did their part well.My advisor was almost always in her office and easy to meet with. It felt like we were her main priority.

E - 28

My advisor was always available and helpful with my questions.My advisor was always happy to help me and was usually readiliy available. He helped me a lot.My advisor was always on top of things and usually willing to work with me, helpful in suggesting and referring me.My advisor was always well-prepared and had enough information I wanted to know. I am happy that she was my advisor.My advisor was always willing to meet with me and answer questions. She is on the ball and very dependable.My advisor was available when I needed to talk with her, she really knew her stuff, and how to help me through the system.My advisor was available with appropriate information.My advisor was awesome! He really cares that I had success and met my goals.My advisor was awesome. she helped me get all I needed and was very nice and helpful.My advisor was competent, prepared, organized, concerned and available.My advisor was courteous and worked hard to straighten things out.My advisor was easy to get a hold of.My advisor was fabulous! She was always willing to help and find out info for me and really cared.My advisor was friendly, knew what she was talking about and was willing to help me succeed.My advisor was great--it really helped to have advice and guidance about school, classes, and jobs.My advisor was great and my college of business advisor as a whole was helpful. I just can't say USU as a whole.My advisor was great.My advisor was great. She was always there for me.My advisor was great. She was very helpful.My advisor was really good to work with.My advisor was really helpful and considerate.My advisor was really kind and she chose the right classes for me.My advisor was really nice and very helpful all of the time.My advisor was very clear on the requirements for my major and could answer all my questions.My advisor was very helpful and friendly.My advisor was very helpful. She is very knowledgable about what requirements need to be met.My advisor was very helpful. She says what she will do and checks up on students.My advisor was very knowledgable and helped my course for graduation.My advisor was very knowledgable concerning classes, instructors, classes to take, etc.My advisor was very nice and helpful. I felt like he knew exactly what he was doing.My advisor was very qualified. She was always willing to help.

My advisor was very thorough when she would visit with me. I think that is the most important thing. She made sure everything was accounted for.My advisor was very well informed and gave me ideas about the path I should follow.My advisor was very willing to meet with me, and work around my schedule.My advisor was well trained. She knew the program, what classes needed to be taken, and when they were being offered at our site.My advisor was willing to go out of her way to help me.

E - 29

My advisor was willing to meet with my whenever I needed to. She didn't make me feel rushed.My advisor, Marcia Roberst, is wonderful. The HASS advisors were terrible, especially the short lady with glasses.

My advisors, including Karen and Tressa were incredible. I always got the help I needed when I needed it, and even made some great friendships.My answers to the advisor section are based on only two to three visits which occured right after my advisor took on her position. She was overwhelmed and stressed.My college is small so they are doing fine.My counselor is excellent. She provides timely and efficient help. She goes beyond the required.My current advisor really seems on top of things, letting me know which classes I plan to take are being cut back by budget cuts.My current advisor was usually helpful and didn't act like I was a waste of time.My department (computer science) has a person hired specifically for advising.My experience with my advisor was very positive. She is knowledgable yet friendly.My husband went to the U of U and never even met his advisor because the advisor was too busy. I have always been treated well by my advisor at USU and several times she has sought me out to give me information.My peer advisor is great. She helped me more than the real advisors.Never worked with the system.NFS department seemed to have an interest in my schooling and graduation.Nice advisors! Very informative and willing to help.Nice counselors, good referrals.nice, friendly, understanding, helpful.Nice, helpful with problems.No answer, nothing specific.No comment.Not a heck of a lot.Not a whole heck of a lot.Not a whole lot.Not making me take any classes I don't need.Not much.Not much. My advisor is extremely hard to get wtih and is not very helpful or nice.Not sure, didn't use much.Not sure, didn't visit them enough.Not sure.Not the right person to ask. I felt like they are basically worthless.Not too much.NothingNothing in engineering.Nothing really well.

E - 30

Nothing really.Nothing really. Wait...Ron Godfrey is a great advisor, and you need more like him.Nothing that I'm aware of. My advisor (not the system) is fabulous and goes to great lengths to meet with and help me, but she has way to many students.Nothing with the exception of a few good advisors.Nothing! It's pathetic!Nothing! Needs improvement.Nothing, my graduate advisor now is 100 times easier to meet with.Nothing.Nothing. I'm very upset right now with every advisor that I have had.Nothing. It has been a total run around for me.Nothing. Teachers want to teach. If you want advisors, get advisors. Teachers do not have time or patience to advise students.Notification of classes, options, changes.Now it's doing a wonderful job letting students know exactly where they stand.Number of advisors, knowledge of advisors.Nutrition/Diatetics dept. keeps excellent track of students and progress.Offered good information about continuing my education after graduation, helped me a lot with the law school application process.Offering peer advisors to answer general questions.Office hours are nice.OKOnce I got in to see my advisor she could help me.Once I got my advisor, they were very caring.Once I made contact with my advisor everything went well.Once I received advanced standing, advising was awesome.Once you're in, you're in.One on one contact.Online major requirement sheets and general catalog.only took classes the last two semestersOpen advising hours. Staff is nice to wokr with.Open and helpful.Open doors--come when you can.Open doors for no appointment meetings.Openess, helpful.Organization and knowledge of advisors.Organization of a large number of students.Organized.Organizing students' plan for academic program. Providing options and encouragement.

E - 31

Outlining graduation requirements.Outstanding help in registering/career path knowledge. Very nice to work with.Parking is horrible.Pat Preston is fabulous! All my conditions were over the phone--I have no complaints, just appreciation for a job well done.Peer advisor was helpful.Peer advisors easy to meet with and really friendly.Peer advisors have been wonderful and have really helped me know what I needed to do especially as a transfer student.Peer advisors.

Peer advisors. Good at getting you in on short notice (psychology department). Karen Ranson and Tressa Haderlie rock! So does Pat Preston!Peers are a good idea. Catalog and requirement sheets are great.Peg Petrzelka was very helpful and I was glad she would help me.Pegg is very helpful. She's great.Peggy Buttars was a great help.Peggy Buttars was fabulous! Always very helpful.People are friendly and helpful.People in the advising office are willing to help, reguardless of whether they are your advisor.Physics Department advisor is very well equipped to do her job.Picking great people to lead the students. These advisors really care about the students.Placing advisor schedule and office hours at door, including phone number and email. Answer simple questions over email.Planning and scheduling.Planning classe accordingly.Planning courses needed to graduate.Planning for future semesters.Planning graduation, letting me know what requirements and credits we needed.Planning Schedules.Planning the undergraduate semester program.Planning your college career.Planning.PlentyPointing me in the right direction to obtain info.Polite and highly knowledgable.Politeness.Postive attitudes, scheduling flexibility.Preparing me for future schooling.Presenting the needed info in a clear concise manner, i.e. the major requirement sheets.Pretty much all students have an advisor, so that's good.

E - 32

Printed information available for students.Professional advisors.Prompt response to emails, phone messages, etc. Very informative and helpful. Knows her stuff!Proper info is readily available to map our degree program, requirements, etc. I only needed one good meeting with my advisor and then email updates thereafter.Provide a well-laid out graduation plan.Provided general catalog so I could advise myself and reassure myself I was taking the right classes.Provides a good list of classes for students to find out what they need.Provides current, accurate information, good availability.Providing adequate information about graduation requirements.Providing advising for every aspect.Providing advisors with adequate information to help guide students in the right direction.Providing advisors with knowledge of the requirements.Providing an advisor.Providing better information to advisors to help students graduate.Providing deadline information.Providing detailed and easy to utilize major requirement sheets.Providing faculty members to students as major advisors.Providing great help in determining what classes to take and staying on track.Providing help during the graduation process.Providing info on how to get through your major in a timely, orderly fashion.Providing information and encouragement as well as support.Providing information making it available.Providing knowledgable advisors.Providing major requirement sheets.Providing peer advisors.Providing plans to students who ask for them.Providing relevant information as to reduce the number of times I have to go see my advisor.Providing requirement sheets so we can be sure ourselves that all requirements are met.Providing requirement sheets.Providing students with the material and information needed co complete this degree.Providing the service.Providing the student with more than one advisor choice in his/her field.PSY advising is very helpful and goes out of their way to make my life easier.

Psych advising is great! Walk-in hours for the easy questions is definitely handy and yet still can make an appointment for the tough questions.Publishing requirements.

E - 33

Pulling my chart ahead of meeting.Putting office times and day in front of their office door.Putting students with professionals in the field, kind of like a mentor program.quick responseQuick response to students requests.Quick to respond, easy and friendly to talk to, listens well.Quick way to check and make sure I'm on the right track.Quickly aiding students - clearly giving them direction on what needs to be done.Quickly respond to email and allow me to take classes out of order to accomodate my work and extension site schedules.Randy simmons is amazing and very helpful.Reminding of important dates.Requirement sheets.Requirements are well described.Requires advisor signatures, holds advising/planning meetings, provides requirement sheets, etc.Requiring the transfer students to meet with their advisor shortly after arrival is nice.Responding quickly to emails.Returning calls.Ron Godfrey was the one advisor that really cared about the students. The other advisors have too many students to worry about.Ronnie did a wonderful job. The best advisor I've had.Ronnie has the human touch. Very pleasant. I was treated as a person and not a number.Ronnie is doing an excellent job. She is much more approachable than Janet Karren ever was. I appreciate that she consistently treated me as an adult.Ronnie is great. Very helpful.Ronnie is nice and willing to help whenever she can.Ruth is very helpful, and very friendly and easy to work with.Sally's enthusiasm and thoroughness are great.Sally is very personable and actively involved in helping me plan for graduation.

Sally Petersen is awesome. You hired her! She's over booked a lot of the time but it's worth the wait because she is so awesome and helpful.Sally Peterson is great!Sally Peterson is seriously the best advisor I've ever seen.Satisfy.Schedule appointemnts easily. Schedule book is convenient and ready to look at, accessible.Schedules.Scheduling and takes the time to help.Scheduling appointments was very easy.Scheduling appointments.

E - 34

Scheduling appointments. Being organized. Giving career advice/direction.Scheduling appointments. Easy to do. Giving great advice on transfer credits.Scheduling everyone into the busy demanding advising schedule. Keep up the great work.Seeing as many students as possible.Seeming to care about the direction I am taking in school.Seems fine.Sending letters and emails to keep me informed. I was always able to contact my advisor.Sending out informative emails.Setting up appointments and keeping them.Setting up the right classes to take.She had all the info and was aware of my situation.She helped me to pick classes and let me know which classes have to wait or ok to take up.She is very quick to answer questions on top of giving information.She is willing to help me. She answers my questions when I have them.She keeps me well informed on what I need to do to graduate. All the paperwork is available.She knows what she's doing.She really has an interest in what I am doing.She tries but lives too far away from us--it's hard to feel she's as involved as if we were at the same site.She was great in every area.She was kind.Sheri Noble is great!Showing exactly what to do.Showing what is needed to graduate.Signing people up for classes.So caring!Social help with lifeSolving problems to students like registering and oreitnation to students.Some advising programs are doing better than others.Some advisors were nice, but overall not oding a whole lot.Some of the advisors are great and very helpful. They are trying to point students in the right direction.Specified trained advisors.Spending time working out schedules.Student Advising Office personel are very helpful.Students get in the right classes most of the time.Supplying information.Susan knows my name and my situation, so it feels more personal and genuine.Susan Williams always finds the answers I need and makes me feel welcome.

E - 35

Susi is very patient and willing to help.Susie is very friendly and knows my name. She works with other advisors to know what is going on.Susie is very nice and accommodating. She helped me to organize my schedule and graduate.Susie knew what she was talking about and resolved my questions and concerns quite efficiently.Susie was very supportive and kind and always bent over backwards to help me.Suzy Stones, my advisor, made herself readily available to meet with by having walk-in advising on Fridays. I found that very helpful.`Sylvia always goes the extra mile to make sure I am taking the classes I need. She's helped a lot.Sylvia and Sheri would always email information and send letters requesting info or letting me know about deadlines in advance.

Sylvia has been great at keeping me informed when I need to get paperwork turned in. She has also helped me choose the appropriate classes.Sylvia knows me personally and takes interess in my goals and cares if I succeed. The rest probably do too.Sylvia Robinson is #1!Sylvia Robinson is a superb advisor.Sylvia Robinson was wonderful. She helped me with whatever I needed and she really knew her stuff.Take care of my needs as a student. Answers my questions to some degree.Take time to make sure everything is in order, and that you are on your way.Takes time to work with me.Taking as many as they can.Taking the time to ensure that students needs are being met.Taking time to help the students decide and direct them.Taking up time.Talking to students.Tell you requirements to graduate.Telling me which classes I need to take.Telling students in advance what they need to take, providing major requirements sheets online.Telling students what they need to do for their major.Telling us exactly what we need to do to graduate.Telling us what courses we need to graduate.Telling you exactly what you need to be able to graduate.Telling you requirements for graduation.Terrible.Thankfully, you can call the psychology advising line toll free a couple times a week.That which they do.The advising dept for music is horrible. Everyone fumbles through the system and hope they get the classes they need.The advising for the department of CEE was always helpful.The advising in the Art Dept has been excellent in providing info on which classes are available and which are needed.The advising on education completion is efficient and effective by going through the course check list.

E - 36

The advising system is doing well. An appointment can be made.The advising system is helpful in explaining simply what needs to be done to prepare for graduation.The advising system is terrific. They treat me like a human being, listen to my questions, give useful information and ask me to come back if there's a problem.The advisor I have been meeting with is not my real advisor. I have been meeting with the Dept. Head.The advisor is very helpful and easy to talk to.The advisor is very helpful.The advisor was very friendly and helpful in answering my questions.The advisors are approachable and most of the time accessible.The advisors are fairly friendly and try to help.The advisors are friendly and helpful. My advisor is attentive and understanding to my personal needs and employment goals.The advisors are helpful and they are very knowledgable about what classes you could take.The advisors are infomed about their majors.The advisors are very knowledgable.The advisors are very organized and helpful to the students.The advisors are very well informed.The advisors are well trained.The advisors get done what they say they will do.The advisors give great help on what classe are best to take.The advisors have the information needed for the students.The advisors I have worked with have always pointed me in the right direction if I have had questions.The advisors in the HPER building and COMD building were very nice and easy to talk to.The advisors in the Psychology Department are doing great. They are friendly, genuinely interested in my life, and they know their stuff.The advisors in the Unitah Basin do great to try to help and make sure we are on track.The advisors know how to help you and are willing to do it.The advisors know what's going on with you--good records.The advisors know what I need to do to get things done. She is awesome.The advisors know what the best classes to take are.The advisors really know everything.The advisors seem to be very familiar with requirements and helpful in creating a plan to lead toward a bachelors degree.The advisors usually have the knowledge to answer questions.The Animal Science advising system is great.The apparel and textile advisor is doing very well helping us out and helping us complete courses so that we can graduate.The ART Dept. needs more money for advisors and advisor related education.The assigned advisors know what they are doing and try to help you.The business advisors are great to make a map of your whole college experience and help you work through it till you finish.

E - 37

The CNR does well because each student has a professor as their advisor. (The USU advising system hasn't done antying for me.) If the CNR hadn't had undergraduate advising by a professor, I probably wouldn't have gotten half of the opportunities I got.The college of business is very organized. Stability is also key to its success (experienced personell/procedures).The counselors are not informed as well in the extension offices as they are on logan campus. Very willing to meet with me.The degree advisor knew a lot.The Eled advising system is doing everything well. From being nice to always being available.The Eled dept. is always available when I need them.The elementary education advisors are amazing. They work hand in hand with the department.The engineering department is great with helping students find jobs and internships.The fact they have an advisor for students is good.The focus is on the students and getting them graduated. My advisor listens well.The general Business advising has always helped me a lot with all my needs.The graduation packets came quickly. Thank you.The graduation requirements are very clear.The HASS advising helped so much! They told me just what I needed to know, but I went there on my own, my major advisor didn't help.The individuals employed are really nice and easy to work with. We just need 10 more of them.The information is readily accessible and the advisors are friendly.The major advisor has been a wealth of information and has gone out of her way to help.The major program advisors know their stuff. They are very helpful in planning.The major requirement sheet I got as a freshman has served me well.The major requirement sheets are a great way for students to be able to plan and map out their own academic career.The major requirement sheets are good.The major requirement sheets are great. The online registration is very usefull.The major requirement sheets are kept well up to date.The major requirement sheets are very clear and helpful.The major requirement sheets were a life source.The major requirement sheets.The major sheets are clear and useful.The major sheets are up to date and explain the requirements well.The major sheets listing all the requirements is good and my advisor was very knowledgable and personable.The Major sourcesThe mapped out a four year track for me. B.S. is great.The one time I contacted my advisor, she was very helpful and prompt in helping me.The people are always helpful and competent, everything is handled very well.The pre-engineering advising helps students know what to do and the master's advising program provides help to students for paperwork.The pre-professional advisor does well.The Psychology department advising website has been very useful.

E - 38

The recent advertisements promising to "help students graduate within 4 years" is a step in the right direction.The registration office has WAY too much control over my academic career.The requirement sheets are really beneficial, other than that, I'm not sure. I don't have much experience with the advising system.The requirement sheets are very good.The staff is great! (MAE)The student advising system has helped greatly.The system is good only insofar as the advisor is. In my case, the system is excellent because Lynne Slade cares about her students.The system seems very student friendly trying to help students achieve their academic goals.The system within the CNR works really well and is very convenient.The USU advising system does well in advising for degree requirements.The USU advising system is doing a good job of making time available for students.The way they find what classes would be best for your career path.There's plenty of personal contact.There are advisors.There are good advisors ho know what needs to happen.There are good major requirement sheets to look at to see where you are and where you need to go.There are lots of advisors.There are lots of people willing to help/advise.There are some wonderful advisors, such as Nancy Leavitt.There are those great advisors like Peggy Butlers who helped me my last semester when I got into my program. I wish my advisor could have been her the whole time.There are well informed advisors to assist students.There is a good system for letting students know what requirements are needed.There is a lot of information available when it is needed.Theuy are supplying advisors that tell you what you need to do, when you need to do it, and why, while encouraging you in your field in a friendly manner.They're doing a good job of letting us know if we're deficient.They're nice people.They're readily available and prepared to help students reach graduation.They're usually available.They're very personal--they try to learn students' names. It's also fairly easy to get an appointment with them.They advise pretty good and process things relatively fast.They advised me in my options for graduating on time!They advisors know what they are doing and offer good suggestions to help you improve your situation.They always help the advisor here to help us as much as possible.They always try to be helpful.They answer questions that I have about my program and graduation.

E - 39

They answer questions very well, and let me know exactly what I need to be doing to graduate.They answer the questions I have.They answered a lot of questions for me about graduating and making sure I had the right classes.They are advising students.They are always available to help.They are always informative. If they don't know something, they look it up.They are always knowledgable and helpful in giving us information that helps us to take the classes we need.They are available most of the time.They are available often and very friendly.They are concerned with my welfare.They are doing a great job.They are easy to get a hold of.They are friendly and competent.They are friendly and easy to get a hold of.They are friendly and helpful if you know what to ask.They are good at making sure you are on track to graduate.They are great about telling me what I need and when.They are guiding me to graduate.They are helpful and helped me to plan to graduate ASAP.They are helpful and knowledgable when you meet them.They are helpful and nice.They are helpful with planning our schedulesThey are helping students understand the requirements for graduation and advanced standing.They are kind and willing to help.They are kind usually.They are kind, willing, and helpful.They are making an effort to accomodate walk ins or phone calls.They are nice.

They are now more efficiently scheduling appointments and don't totally shun you if you only have a few questions, but not formal appointment.They are open for appointments.They are organized and friendly.They are planning well.they are pretty easy to get in contact with when we need them.They are pretty much up to speed with students' requirements.They are readily available to answer any questions I have.They are really organized when I do visit.

E - 40

They are set up just fine. I knew where I needed to go to get an appointment scheduled and never had a problem getting one.They are showing options to students even if that is not in that advisor's field.They are straight forward.They are there at the school.They are there when we need them.They are trying to help.They are trying to make it understandable.They are usually around when you need to talk to them.They are usually available for appointments and can usually help.They are very encouraging, helpful, and give great advice.They are very friendly and helpful. They make you feel that you are top priority.They are very good at being there are being ready to help.They are very good at preparing everything the student needs before the student arrives.They are very helpful in telling us how we can graduate and making sure we have the requirement necessary.They are very helpful when asked.They are very helpful.They are very informative and positive.They are very intelligent and experienced. They know exactly what you need to take and help you achieve your long term goals.They are very on task and tell me everything I need.They are very organized and eager to assist.They are very personal (Dave Wallace), he does a great job, very helpful.They are very quick to work with you.They are very supportive of your decision.They are very willing to help with whatever they can at any time.They are very willing to work with on whatever you need.They are well informed and really care about the students.They are well prepared nad aware of what we need for graduation.They are willing to make me a priority each time I call.They are willing to meet with students and are willing to help students solve problems.They are.They aren't very good at answering e-mail, making it so I didn't need to meet with her in person.They call well.They can substitute the classes you need.They can tell you quickly what your requirements are.They do a good job of finding out what you want and then being straight forward with what you need to do.They do an excellent job helping the student plan class schedules so that all requirements for graduation are met.They do an OK job.

E - 41

They do give information that can be useful to students if they know how to use it.They do really well in making you feel important and in helping you succeed.They do well at informing the students of requirements for graduation and at keeping them on track.They don't have my advisor visiting with too many people that he couldn't see me on a whim.They ehlped with some courses.They encourage that you meet with them.They force us to see advisor for specific things.They gave me many options for my major that helped me a lot.They genuinely care about the students and share their opinions openly.They get right to the point--what I need to take in order to graduate.They give helpful advice which is up to date.They give information and guidance. Need more advisors, though.They give you help when you ask for it.They got me graduated on time and on track. Thanks.They got rid of (Advisor Name).They have 2 good employees: Mary Leavitt and Jill HASS. Other than that, NOTHING!They have a great resource in their counselors. Mary Leavitt is the best ever.They have a large number of advisors to accomodate most students. It was not too hard to schedule an appointment.They have a pretty good idea of what's going on.They have advisors available if the student wants to meet with them.They have advisors available.They have all of the forms you need in an easy to find location.They have answers to my quiestions about possibilities. Peer advisors are a great tool. They have the answers that the advisors don't have time for.They have days for extension students to call and talk to them.They have done well keeping me informed about meetings and speaker that came to campus.They have good service. Karen was always nice to me.They have great requirement sheets to help plan the future courses needed.They have made obtaining a school schedule easy.They have people that are willing to go out of their way to help, and they are very personable.They help me get through all the problems I run into with scheduling and planning.They help with transfering credits from other universities.They help you get into classes.They help you get ready for graduation.They help you know what you need to do to graduate.They help you to choose classes you actually need.They hired a full time advisor.

E - 42

They hired Marera Roberts. She is well informed and just wonderful.They hired Sally Peterson.They keep data accurate and current and easily accesibleThey keep me informed about changes.

They keep me on track, not only telling me what class I need to graduate, but also what class would be beneficial to me personally for my future.They keep up with current requirements and know what's required to graduate and make planning easier.They keep you informed. If I did need something I would hav felt comfortable going to my advisor.They know exactly what classes students need to take in order to reach their goals.They know how to answer my questions and if they can't help me, they know where to send me.They know required classses and when they are available, they're very knowledgable about how to help.They know the programs very well and are very available for appointments.They know their stuff for the most part.They know what classes I need to take, but not if they will be offered.They know what classes we need to take in order to graduate. Advising is helpful to students.They know what is required of students. They are friendly.They know where you should be going schedule wise and what you should be doing time wise. Example: Graduation.They let you know your advisor early on in the major.They list who your advisor is so that you know. Having major requirement sheets.They make it clear exactly what I need to do.They make it clear what you need to get the most of your schooling.They make it easy to make an appointment.They make sure the information gets out.They make the time to meet and make sure you're on the track you want to be on.They make time to speak with the students.They meet with students ...not a positive experience.They meet with students.They offer organizing and help you get everything straight.They provided us with the information that we needed.They publicize advisors well, both on the web and in USU publications. It was not hard to find out who my advisor was.They put in a lot of time for me. They register the classes I need for me. Kind, "no problem" attitude.They really care and help you figure out your plan to graduate.They really helped me plan each semester so I could graduate the earliest possible.They seem to be accommodating wiht schedules and are prepared for meeting.They seem to care.They seem to know what's going on.They sent me a letter when I was accepted that informed me of my advisor and how to contact him.

E - 43

They show concern for my education and try to keep me on track with my goals so I can be successful when I graduate.They show that they care.They strive to make sure the students they advise are getting the classes they need and are concerned about the students education.They tell you what you need to know.They try to help out whenever they can.They try.They understand what is required for graduation and help you accomplish your goal without wasting your time and money on classes you don't need or want.They usually respond to my emails immediately.They were a great help letting me know what classes I needed to take.They were always available by phone.They were great at letting me know which semesters classes would be offered.They were helpful at most things.They were nice and helped me feel comfortable.They were very helpful and available.They work hard to help me get all the things done that I needed to do. They always got me all the info and went the extra mile to help.They work well with each other inter-departmentally.They work well with students and were very well informed.They work well wtih scheduling.They work with you well, friendly, and reliable.They worked well with me, helped me understand what could overlap for the different requirementsThose who advise seem pretty informed.times available for appointmentsTo see my major/minor advisors, it was easy and worthwhile. I got a lot accomplished and left feeling positive about it.Tries to accomodate students.Tries to assist students through any given medium (phone, email, etc.)Tries to meet with students.Trying to accommodate lots of students.Trying to be accessible to the students.Trying to expand.Trying to help lots of students.Trying to improveTrying to improve.Trying to insure juniors and seniors graduate.Trying to stay up to demand by hiring peer advisors.Trying to teach, advise, and balance other tasks at once.Trying to understand the needs of the students.

E - 44

Understanding my needs and accommodating to them.Understanding what needs to be done for the most part.Using good information.USU advising system is not doing well. They need help.USU is doing very well by keeping Lynn Slade as an adivsor here. She is seriously the very best!Usually available.Usually quick with planning and counseling.Very accessible, frinedly staff.Very accessible, on top of class changes, schedule charges and they're very flexible in working with what the student wants to do as opposed to "the system."Very accomodating.Very approachable, willing to help.Very competent individuals working there. Very kind, helpful individuals as well.Very explicit on what you need to do to graduate.Very friendly and accomodating.very friendly and helpfulVery friendly and informative.Very friendly and knowledgable.Very friendly and willing to help.Very friendly staff, very helpful.Very friendly to students. Willing to help and give advice.Very friendly, eager to help, treat me respectfully, attentive and genuine concern for me.Very good advisors that help in academic planning. The advisors are well informed about departmental information.Very helpful and available.Very helpful and easy to work with.Very helpful and friendly.Very helpful and know what's going on.Very helpful and knowledgable.Very helpful and willing to make phone calls if they don't know the information.Very helpful and with my long distance!Very helpful at telling what courses needed to graduate.Very helpful in advising as to which classes to take.Very helpful in advising what classes I needed to take in order to graduate.Very helpful in making sure they help to get graduation requirements fullfilled.Very helpful in planning semester by semester. Scheduling and Graduation help.Very helpful on long term planning.Very helpful to students.

E - 45

Very helpful, excited to see you, good information.Very helpful, major source of information about my program.Very helpful.Very helpful. Knows the requirements needed.Very helpful. They know their stuff and guide you to where and what to do.Very informative and helpful.Very knowledgable and flexible.Very knowledgable.Very little.Very nice, do anything to help.Very organized. My advisor always knew exactly what info I needed.Very patient and friendly.Very personable staff.Very personable, willing to help find classes.Very professional and thorough.Very supportive and helpful.Very willing to help, make suggestions.Vince Lafferty and Jana Kay Lunstad are great advisors who really take time and care about students.Walk-in hours are nice to have.Was easy to get appointment. Advisor was helpful.Well-informed, knows requirements, and what I need to fulfill them.Well informed about meeting requirements and the staff.Well informed.Well organized, prepared to handle a wide array of problems and questions.Well, I made it to graduation, so they helped me on that.Well, I think the advisor has more information about my major so that I could easily follow it to graduate.Well, the advisors are great.What are you asking?When I do go to get advice, it really doesn't matter who I talk to, I still get quality advice.When I do have questions they are willing to help me out.When I have a question I get a fast answer.When I have met with advisors they have been very knowledgable and helpful.When I needed to meet with an advisor, I appreciated the open door policy.When I was able to see my advisor he was well informed.When the advisor is well informed, they can provide very good information, and for the most part, they are.When the advisors are nice and friendly.When there is uncertainty about a course.

E - 46

When you do get in to see them they are very helpful.Will find the answers to my questions even if they have to play phone tag.Willing to help, answers questions, knows me personally. I didn't have to introduce myself everytime. It helped that my advisor taught a class of mine.Willing to help, requirement sheets.Willing to make time and answers most of my questions.With Donna it is very personal and informative.Worked with me well through the requirement change.Working hard.Working well with the ultimate goal (i.e. experience and education) by applying my ideas to my schedule and degree.Working with students and providing effective information.Working with students to get them graduated and on with life.Working with students to help get them out of school.Working with the students requirements.Working with you to help you get on the fastest track in your major to help you graduate when you want to.Works well with dual majors.YesYes if you have a good advisor.Yes is doing well.Yes, but it was hard to make appointments.Yes, but ocnfusing because I switched advisors my last year. My old advisor had me going to a class I took the previous year.Yes, excpet for peer advisors.Yes, it is doing very well. I was able to get appointments when needed and I was able to sign and complete all classes.Yes, it is doing well.Yes, my advisor was wonderful.Yes.Yes. Much better since you replaced Madeline Thimes wtih Jan Lyons.Yes. The advising system is doing very well. It is very helpful. Without my advisor, I'll definately get lost. He is excellent. Thanks so much for assigning him to us as an advisor.You're doing a good job.You are assigned an advisor that knows the procedures towards graduation.You are trying.You can get some clear answers and direction from them.You have advisors.You have good people that are friendly and helpful.

E - 47

Appendix F

How The USU Advising System Needs To Improved

APPENDIX F- How The Advising System Needs To Improve

(Advisor Name) helped me get into the wrong classes my freshman year.(Name) could be in her office more often.800 phone number for out of area students. Unitah Basin has limited local calling areas.A better phone system.A few times I was told to take certain classes when I didn't need to!A formal system for advising every student at least to help wtih schedule, help wtih plans, etc. should be enforced. They handed me a book with class schedules and that was it.a little more structured. For the first few semesters, I didn't know who my advisor was. Then when I got a name and emailed them, I was forwarded through quite a few people. It has only been in the last couple of semesters that I've actually been ableA lot of other departments are not personable. An online advising system would be helpful. i.e. email or some kind of instant messaging.A lot of students probably won't come in unless it is required (like for graduation.)A more personalized program could be effective. I sometimes feel I am a bother to the advising center.A more positive advising style.A sheet of paper saying absolutely everything that must be done and when it needs to be done by.Ability to answer personal emails promptly. Sometimes a student has a simple question and it sometimes isn't answered.Accepting more transfer creditsActually care about the students, worry about if they're going to graduate, interact.Actually care for the students, quit assuming we know how the system works.Actually tell you who your advisor is so you don't have to use your college's general advisor. Train engineering faculty how to advise.Address all options.Adopt a computerized system much like BYU. Shows what has been completed and remaining coursework in an online format. It's easy to understand and know where you stand in your program.Advertise. Connections program is smart. So many students don't even know they have to come in. Get better advisors who care.Advertising itself more clearly.Advise students through email of application for graduation requirements and deadlines. Even a mass-email would be sufficient.Advising can definitely be improved by making printouts of requirements a little easier to understand.Advising in the art department is horrible! There's no personal attention. The professors are too busy and overwhelmed to advise. The secretaries have too many other duties to worry about. I would strongly suggest hiring an advisor or two for art stuAdvising is not necessary for everyone. Often I did not learn anything I did not know at my advisor appointments, but went because I was required to go.Advising was wonderful. He was the only reason I graduated.Advisor at distance education site was NO help at all. Also, making distance education students aware of their major advisors would help.Advisor could be more involved in job placement as well as be more available for appointments.advisor have to be more people friendly. I often hesitated to visit my advisor because I felt I was bothering him.Advisor needs to know what's going on. I feel that she is lost or confused a lot.

F - 1

Advisors and faculty need to get together oftenAdvisors are the ones that students actually get to spend one on one time with. This relationship could expand beyond academics and include career planing or they could help students to know how to get the most out of their USU experience.Advisors better informed--schedule layout would be helpful.Advisors could be better trained to help students meet graduation requirements. I almost always had to go to the department for guidance. I was assigned an advisor, but the department knew more about major requirements.Advisors could be helped to understand general education requirements better.Advisors could be more interested in students well being!Advisors could spend a little more time on an initiative meeting with individual students in order to best helpl them gain direction on the best way of meeting the goal of graduation.Advisors didn't seem to know too much about the transition from quarters to semesters.Advisors don't care about students and aren't accessible.Advisors for minors could be more known or eliminated. My advisor was awesome. I never went away uninformed.Advisors have more information about career opportunities in your field and calsses that would apply.advisors more availableAdvisors must be much more informed and have more experience advising students.Advisors need more general info about registration and classes.Advisors need to be available to answer students questions. If an advisor posts taht her office hours are a certain time, I expect them to be there at that time. It's unfair for students to have to take up every free minute of their time trying to huntAdvisors need to be more personally involved in sitting down and talking about career plans. If they had organized concise information that they could give to the students when they come in for their appointments, it would be great. Specifically infomrAdvisors need to be more up-to-date on required classes that might be hard to get into. They should let students know which ones will require a waiting Advisors need to care and want students to take the shortest path to graduation.Advisors need to get in contact with students their freshman year and determine what graduation goals they have.Advisors need to inform students of everything that can affect them.Advisors need to let the student know he/she is available to them. I switched advisors from (Name) because she told me I didn't need any more classes, when in reality there were at least 2 breadth classes that I had to take which delayed graduatiAdvisors need to personally contact their students. Many students don't know who their advisors are until there is a problem.Advisors need to sit down and writ eout a curriculum to give students direction.Advisors need to understand and know ins and outs to program. Help students to graduate in 4 years.Advisors only have a small window to meet with students and many times their offices hours conflict with students schedules.Advisors should be full time so they are more available. Advisors should also inform on different opportunities for the students.Advisors should be on time to appointments with students. They need to be more helpful in planning schedules.Advisors should be up to date of requirements for graduation for their clint's major, and should be aware or careful to give CORRECT information to Advisors should make the first contact through email or USPS in order to better connect with the students.Advisors should provide doughnuts. Other than that, all is well.Advisors to work more with the students.

F - 2

Advisors who are excited to be advisors, i.e. those whose main responsibility is an advisor.Advisors who care.Advisors who have more time for advising duties and helping students be more aware of who their advisor is and how to find them.Advisors would have more time available for career and academic advsiing and not be in such a rush each time I met with them. Felt several times that a visit to my advisor was an interruption, a hassle, and a bother. Would have enjoyed some actual adviAdvisors would keep better tabs on the students progress and any problems.Aiding in interests students may have: internship options, independent study.All my advisors were great.Allow more time for advising. I always felt rushed.Allow themselves to be more frequently available. I know it is tough with a lot of students, but it would have been helpful.An academic advisor was assigned to me as a freshmen (the one I listed). However, I have only been able to see a peer advisor. The university should list the name of who we can see.An advisor should be available to help all during the week and when the one advisor is gone, another person should be there that knows information. I was upset numerous times that I could not get a hold of my advisor when I needed information.Anything.Appointments are a little difficult to make, because you have to make them far in advance. Overall, I think there is a little need for improvement.As far as I can tell, nothing!As my major, marketing, there is only one advisor doing all processes such as register (providing sign) for students. I believe department may find more smooth way to let students in class, especially first one week of semester.Ask more specific questions on what students want to do, gear education towards that.assertive help reguarding choices students make. Unbiased opinion in our major that involves more than one mentor. Separate help in that one person is not central to this advising system.Assign an advisor sooner. I didn't get admitted to the professional program until I was a senior, so I will only register for one sememester with the advice of my academic advisor.Assign an advisor that the student knows from a class taken or the like.Assign faculty with same interests as students. My advisor is a fluids guy, I'm more interested in manufacturing in MAE department.Assign one advisor to focus on all students like the English Department provides.Assign the advisors better. My advisor was excellent, but not in an emphasis specific to me.Assigned advisor was not helpful or easy to reach. My assigned advisor does not seem to know or care about my academic plans.At the beginning of my time at USU, I was kind of lost and confused as to graduation requirements etc. I would have liked to have been contacted and helped at the beginning.Attitude. Be nice and respectful.Automate everything by supplying requirements that were met by the student online to make paperwork easier to fill out. As a transfer student I had a hard time knowing if I had completed all the requiremetns and with what classes.Availability of advisors.Availability.Be a little bit more organized and up-to-date on information.

F - 3

Be able to answer quick questions over the phone.Be able to meet more often with students. Be more understanding and patient with students.Be able to provide life info, not just academic.be around more often, and get back with us soonerBe available more. I had a hard time getting in to meet with an advisor.Be available when it is more convenient for the students.Be consistant. Be accurate. Don't lie. Don't say one thing and do another. This is for the Dept.Be consistent.Be earnestly engaged in helping me know exactly what classes I need to take and care about me graduating.Be less like a beuracracy.Be located in Roosevelt.Be more accessible to students. Possibly hire another advisor to help Kathy Bayn.Be more available to students. Make sure students see their advisors to keep on the ball.Be more available to the extension sites.Be more available, more often.Be more available.Be more clear on transfer credits.Be more courteous of the students and their needs.Be more encouraging to students, realize that the classes (some) are difficult, know that some class combos are too much work for the average student.Be more flexible in meeting times.Be more flexible with full classes. If you need a class to graduate on time, help make the arrangements.Be more friendly and don't act like you are stupid.Be more friendly to new students.Be more in the know of what classes are available.Be more informed, aware of the prerequisites for classes.Be more involved on campus so people know what they do.Be more knowledgable.be more on time with appointments. If they have an appointment scheduled, don't allow walk-ins.Be more open and understanding.Be more open for advising.Be more personable.Be more personal. Know prerequisites to classes.Be more upfront with transfer students about all of the volunteer and grad school requirements.Be nice and respect students. Be more available and flexible.Be on time with scheduled appointment.Be open 24/7. Just kidding. All is well.Be sure to get students with the correct advisor as soon as possible.

F - 4

Be there in the office longer.Be willing to write down and record information of previous visits. Willing to apply previous credits to current classes.Because she's a wonderful advisor, it was difficult to get an appointment. It would be nice if there were drop in hours in a day or I could meet her in an emergency situation.Because the peer advisor is so great, I never met with the advisor.Before I changed majors, my advisor would not take the time to help me. All he did was hand me a requirement sheet and push me out the door. Have advisors help reduce the load so a better relationship between students and advisors could exist. StrongeBefore I got Peggy Buttars as my advisor I had problems with my general advisor not knowing what I needed to do to get advanced standing.Before I met with my current advisor, the advisros in the HASS office were not helpful. They need to be better trained so they can answer your questions and they also need to slow down. No rushing!Better advertisement and emphasis on necessity of use.Better and more advisors.Better appointment scheduling.Better appointments.Better at informing students who their advisors are and less wait to getting in to talk to an advisor.Better communication between advisors and registrars office.Better communication between departments. (Advising, registration, cashiers, etc.)Better communication between depts and administration.Better communication between HASS and social work advisors.Better communication between undergrad/grad programs.Better communication in explaining "why" changes are made.Better communication.Better communication. I didn't know I had an advisor until my secord or third year of school. I decided I needed help with meeting requirements and made an appointment with Lynne Slade. Even now I'm not sure she's assigned to be my counselor. Let stuBetter coordinate advising or class requirements.Better explanations of transfer credit.Better handling on registration days.Better help/clarity for transfer students to know waht counts. More accurate information given to other schools about USU program requirements.Better inform students of changes in required courses. Inform advisors of changes of well.Better notification when the requirement sheets change. More advisors to make advising more accessible and less rushed.Better organization. Follow through with appointments made. Be more professional. Don't have a part time advisor with varied hours be the only one who can sign graduation papers for the major I'm in.Better organized, but I don't really have anything really to say. I mostly found that they were not organized.Better personal attention, help, planning.Better training of new advisors before receiving the job.Better website/info.Bigger office, more advisors.

F - 5

Business department (1st major) should care about undergraduates.By actually helping students, being up to date, being honest. I was very disappointed with the help and support by the advising system.By allowing more flexible office hours.By being more available at the beginning and ending of each semester.By giving good advising! When I first started school up here, there were quite a few general ed. classes that I By giving good advising. When I first started school up here ther were quite a few general ed. classes that I was told I didn't need to takeBy having a candy jar or some type of free food supplied to my advisor, so I might want to visit him more.By keeping track of students better.By making sure that the information given is correct for each individual and not just generic information. This would prevent so many headaches.By making the advisors accessible to students and actually trying to help them.By modeling it after the PSYCH advising Dept.By not asking me to talke this type of survey.By providing more engineering advisors during the pre professional programs.By taking students seriously. My advisor wouldn't support an internship because he said I wasn't serious about my major. That's a load of crap. This survey is also a load of crap and a waste of my time. Lucky you--sociology taught me this survey is uCan't think of anything.Carolyn is a little sassy about Ronnie's appointments.centralize and have one or two designated departmental advisors, because many professors are not very informative or on the same page regarding graduation requirements.Change Gen Ed requirements. Have advisors be aware of the general education requirements.Changing graduation requirements close to graduation.Check on students and their progress more often. Send emails and/or reminder cards in the mail. Keep students more informed of services, etc.Check the status of the students. I took classes in the first semester, but I actually did not have to take those classes because I am a 2nd BS student. My advisor found out in the next semester.Check up on students to make sure they are on track.Choose the most friendly, personble advisors, (not academic). Make students get advising every semester or at least once a year. I did not go to advisors to seek help because I was easily intimidated by professors and embarassed by my low grades.Clear requirement changes. When Family Life closed there was a lot of confusion and even advisors were confused.Clearer requirements, more uniform throughout the university.Clone Donna! She is fantastic. I don't know how she remembers and keeps track of it all, but she does. Always there when she's needed.Clone Marcia Roberts.Clone the HASS advisng office.Clue students in to the process that is graduation sooner so that we can avoid late fees and make it less stressful.Combine generals and major advisors so one person can advise on both, rahter than going to HASS center for generals and the department for major requirements. Less run around.COMD/DE needs a full time advisor.Communicate any changes in requirements quicker.

F - 6

Communicate between departments. It takes like 3 or more offices in the different buildings to get answers to the simplest questions, then the answers Communicate deadlines.Communication was weak. We had a hard time finding out deadlines. Our paperwork was lost more than once. Very frustrating.Communication.Computer based appointment scheduling.Connect all computers on campus so all advisors have the same current information.Consistency and contact between advisors. I had Ted Andrus, then swiched to Jana Kay and my schedule changed relatively significantly.Consistency. More communication by staff to students. Get more than one person to sign off graduation applications.Contact the students.Contacts via email.Continue to have site advisor.Could be more friendly and encouraging.Could have provided a way for my advisor to know about the independent study classes I was taking. Also, to be informed more about my minor.Could know when classes are being held for sure so you could plan your schedule better.Current system is still good.Database system for students have to provide exactly information to each student.Dee is great. I can't think of any need for improvement.Definitely could use more advisors. 8 for thousands of students? Come on.Dennis has done a great job helping me with the classes needed to work toward my degree.Develop early warning so those who may not meet grad. requirements will get an email telling them to meet with an advisor.didn't use enough to knowDifficult to judge because I am a distance ed. studentDirect students to a more appropriate advisor based on their majors.Directions are a little unclear in how long things should take and exactly the process, i.e. what is needed to drop a class.Discontinue use of peer advisors. They don't know enough. Implement a tracking system so students can meet with advisors yearly and solidify plans.Disiminating info more thoroughly. I took a class I didn't need or want because of the quarter semester switch and it marred my transcript.Distance Ed. on site advisors need to be better informed. Steve Geyer (Salt Lake) was absolutely worthless! Not only could he not answer most of my questions, he actually misinformed me. Other students have had the same experience with him.Do an advising evaluation BEFORE students graduate so they aren't stuck with poor advising throughout their college career. Financial Aid advising is ludicrous! They were completley incompetent and destructive!Do away with stupid requirements like two USU prefix classes if breadth requirements have already been met because I was told they were designed to expediate graduation. They are holding me back now.Do not allow one advisor to keep track of forms pulled out of drawer. Have them put them back and keep them all in one place for other to find when Doing a great job, but possibly quicker appointments when needed.Doing good.Doing well.Don't be afraid to tell us college is hard work.

F - 7

Don't be some incompetent. Put the students first and not the silly rules of the school. Remember who keeps you in business. Learn to make exceptions, and be more helpful to transfer students.Don't change advisor too often.Don't change advisors every year or semester. The advisors could fulfill more of a mentoring role if you didn't constantly switch their students. There was no point getting to know your advisor or even asking them for academic advice because they don'tDon't change classes from spring taught to fall taught without more than a year advance notice.Don't change requirements on a person after they've been enrolled in a program.Don't discourage a student from finishing school! (Name)Don't give out wrong information regarding classes that qualify for credit in my major. I once had to change my whole schedule because of this.Don't have HASS students required to go from HASS to department to emphasis back to HASS etc.Don't have office hours only one hour a day. Students probably have to miss class to talk with an advisor.Don't know.Don't let people be advisors if they aren't willing to devote some time to it.Don't make exceptions to rules for some students and not for others.Don't make me do all the work to figure out what's going on. Encourage the students (not just suggest). I often felt like I'm only graduating because I got lucky, not that someone is pushing, encouraging etc. met to. Don't lose people like me.Don't make the students run all over the place for a simple answer.Don't make them do research too!Don't talk students out of something they've already decided on!Donna is exceptional. I don't see any way to improve.Double check their work so when it comes down to crunch time there's no surprises.Dr. Cho didn't know much about the requirements for graduation.Dr. Thorpe left on an LDS mission and I didn't know who to talk with until this week (1st week of my last semester).During the wekk that the HASS office has walk in appointments, please allow for appointments to be made in advance as well!Easier email Q and A for quick questions and tough schedules.Easier to access advising resources.Easier to get appointments.Easier to get help.Easier to make an appointment and with less notice.Easier to meet with. Sometimes too pushy wiht their ideas.Easier to use, more accessible, more info on graduation.Educate advisors in HASS dept. to help students. Every time I saw an advisor in this dept. it was someone different and I got different answers, nothing was consistent. Very frustrating!Educate the students to whom and where and what they need to do to meet and deal with the scheduling of classes to graduate.Either more advisors (HASS especially) or more slots for meeting with advisors. I have had several times when I just had a question or had a very important thing I needed to talk to them about immediately, but had to wait a week and a half for an appoinElementary Education knows what they are doing in advisement.

F - 8

Eliminate it, would make it easier for students.Email answers to frequently asked questions and advice to future career opportunities.Emailing students with reminders.Encourage advisors to spend more time and care more about students.Encourage advisors to talk with students about plans for after graduation.Encourage and help students to plan and meet and avoid crazy crunch time.encourage more student visits, clarify individual advisor. Simplify the survey below. It is redundant and the answer order flips halfway through the Encourage more visits from the students.Encourage students to seek advisors early.Encourage students to work with advisors earlier on in their education.Encourage the decisions students are making for their own lives.Encourage visits.Even though students might not want to hear about opportunities, have the advisors let them know about it.Every time we make an appointment, make sure if possible it will work out. If not let us know 48 hours in advance in order to change.Everyone needs to be informed of same info.Expand the HASS advising. They need more counselors. It's hard to get in to see one. You often have to wait a long time.Explain the options better on further education opportunities.Facilitate better advising at the distance education site.Fan out the advising from just one advisor in math.FCHD/DFED--This system needs to be re-done. There is no ONE person who knows what's going on. I have 4 contacts for advising and date from one source often varies/conflicts with date from another. Advising needs to be consolidated.Fewer students for advisor so it is more personal and individual.Find a new advisor for interior design students.Find some solution to the HASS advising center. They are very unhelpful. They seem put out when asking to make an appointment. They are over worked and under staffed. The initial secretary that you meet walking in, I think her name is Vana, is quiteFire (Name).Fire and hire over. NO one, except 2 employees, ever knew what was going on. I wish the survey included all advisors I've had, not just the last one.First and foremost, more faculty members need to be advisors so that those who are advisors do not have too many students to advise.Follow through on appointmentsFor academic advising, more people or that person in the major's building so students can go to them instead of making an appointment a week in advance so we don't have to make our secretary crazy to help us. Give Marsha a raise in fav-art!For distant students, tell them who their advisor is. I never knew until 1 month before I graduated.For this degree it can't be, but for other degrees, use the system Hyrum Hall uses.Friendlier advisors. If they happen to not like the student or have a poor opinion of one, they should not make it obvious or at least be congenial. Let students have option to change advisors. Know individual students better. More advisors.Friendlier and polite advisors (this has been done this semester.)From experience I think the advising system is doing well.

F - 9

Get a guy who cares and doesn't make you feel like you are a burden.Get a new advisor for interior design. He does not do his job to its potential, is hard to get a hold of, and rarely keeps his appointments that were made on time. He also screwed me up so I am graduating later.Get a new secretary system. Don't do walk ins, do appointments. We just need a few questions first week of school. IT's not worth standing in line for 2 Get advisors for Generals that know what they are doing and actually have time to meet with people. I met with my first advisor when I was a Junior.Get advisors more involved in career planning.Get advisors that are at work to help students instead of be bothered by them. Luckily for me, I transferred from engineering, where there's no help, to geography, where there's plenty of help.Get advisors who are more on the ball and know exactly what you need for graduation.Get advisors whose primary concern is to help the students and not to shuffle them out asap.Get appointments anytime.Get better advisors for freshmen, or hook them up to a good advisor like Frank.Get better advisors for general business. Advisor (ID Number) was horrible at helping me before I was assigned a new advisor.get better informed advisorGet better trained staff. Answer emails. Do research. Some advice was wrong.Get it right the first time. Counselors/advisors have made 2 mistakes that could have potentially delayed graduation...or I could just be dimwitted. Oh Get more advisors because we had to sit and wait in line for hours! If you had more advisors then maybe the advisors would really care about helping us graduate and really think about the best for us. Have more available hours because some students havGet more advisors for engineering.Get more advisors for pre-business students and assign 1 advisor to one student. I never know who to talk to or how to figure out how I could get the same advisor. Everytime I've had to tell my story to someone different and I'd get conflicting answersGet more advisors so that they can all know and understand a couple of particular majors.Get more advisors so we can meet more frequently, less of a delay on appointments with advisors. Most appointments set took a week before we finally Get more advisors to spread out the demand.Get more awesome advisors so they won't be swamped with too may students.Get more help. Ronnie is overwhelmed!Get more like Lynn.Get more so you can meet at a timely basis. I had to schedule at least 2 weeks in advance.Get organized. Advisors are great but the ladies running the office are incompetent and inefficient.Get organized. Department advisors know nothing about generals and general advisors know nothing about major requirements. It sucks going to advisors when you end up having to figure it out on your own anyway.Get people who know what they are doing.Get rid of (Name).Get rid of HASS and make the Dept. Advisors do their job. Or one advisor that does only that in each dept. I hear the business school also has a good program. But get rid of HASS!Get rid of peer advisors. Try to get students in more on a freshman level.Get rid of the (Dean of College), he only cares about money.

F - 10

Get rid of the advisor with the number (Advisor ID number). She was my advisor for three quarters and I feel that she does a poor job. I feel that she doesn't put time into her job and that she doesn't like it.Get some advisors who really care about the students. The advisors are very discouraging.Get someone to help Kathy Bayn. She has too many students to advise.Get students in sooner.Get the advisors to care more about their students. It's kind of sad. I'll be graduating next semester and my advisor doesn't even recognize me in the Get the education department more involved with the art department. Also get another (College Dean), or someone to help sign applications!Get the story straight for Grad. School requirements. I was told a lot of different things.Get them all on the same page. One advisor gave me advice after another contradicted them. I was basically told to take a class I didn't need on several occasions.Get to know the students.Get to students earlier and seem more available.Get to the point. Exact what you need to be done and not waste any time.Get your advisors on track with other schools. You deal extremely poorly with transfer students, especially from Dixie State College. Your own advisors in the Bus. Dept. cost me a semester of school. Jan Lyons is good, it's the rest of them.Get your stories straight. One person says one thing, the other says another.Getting appointments in a timely manner and scheduling correctly.Getting information quicker and finding appointment times.Getting other classes that can be substituted for the classes that are required.Give a heads up on deadlines is a more direct way than posting them on a board in the hall. Many students don't check the board.Give advice.Give advisors more authority to make decisions.Give away money?give better outline of requirements in the start for the later part of major. To plan for minors better.Give encouragement.Give information on how to find advisor and set up appointments.Give more info about what they are for and how to meet with them. Don't make them an advisor if their on sabatical.Give more info to a student earlier on in a student's time at the university.Give more info to the students.Give out more information pertaining to graduate schools. Care more about students' welfare.Give priority to graduating seniors. Also, I felt like she would pressure me into some things I didn't want to do, but in the end, we worked it out.Give some advice, try to help students.Give the correct advisor first time around!Give the POLS dept. a specific advisor, not just staff. Veronica Ward just kicked me out of her room and said she didn't have time for me for another Give the same accurate information every time.Give us more information on what we need to do to graduate.Giving the students more options.

F - 11

Go to one person for answers and not have to go to 3 different places to get things done.Good as is.Graduation process.Greater hours of availability.Greater in-depth review of transcripts for transfer students.Hard to find appropriate phone numbers when trying to contact advisors.Hard to get in to visit. Not very many times available.Hard to knwo where to find information, less personable.has been greatly improved with hiring Ronnie Green. She knows what she is doing and cares about those she advises.HASS Advising Center is hugely understaffed and quite inconvenient. Change it!HASS advising needs easier access for Seniors, even if it is two weeks in advance. With busy scheduling in the last year of school, it would be nice to get an appointment in advance instead of waiting for HOURS to get in.HASS advisors are very hard to get into, maybe somehow get more advisors or make them more available.Have a central advising location. Don't change requirements so often.Have a four year major schedule set out. 15 credits/semester layed out to follow for those students that knoww aht they want to do, complete with # and emails for related clubs, work-study, and internships. Things are too disconnected.Have a person designated for advising only.Have a secretary for people who want to get an appointment because it seems no one is in charge of that.Have a way to make an apointment on-line.Have advisor for each college who are not professors, then they have more time to advise.Have advisors at SOAR.Have advisors at the extension campuses.Have advisors be more well known and more available.Have advisors better informed in all academic needs in the system.Have advisors better trained so they can help more.Have advisors centrally located so when I get the run around I won't have far to go.Have advisors keep better track of what classes students need.Have advisors open for more walk in appointments.Have advisors that are willing to work with students and help them out when they have questions. Pleasantly.Have advisors that can actually help you with career goals. My advisors seemed very disinterested in my education. They got me in and out as soon as possible and were unable to address a lot of my questions. They aren't very warm and welcoming. Plus,Have advisors who aren't sexist and discouraging (Name).Have advisors who have time to meet with the students and who are more readily available.Have advisors who want to help the studnets. Continued training is needed in my advisor's case. Have only had Tom Peterson as my advisor and he has never been prepared, given helpful advice, or encouragement.Have advisors, not teachers, doing it.Have all advisors be enthusiastic and helpful as my advisor was.

F - 12

Have all HASS advisors on same page. I met with three different advisors and had to wokr out three different programs.Have an academic advisor like Kathy Bayn for the graduate program too!Have an advising day for students.Have an advisor who knows things about each program at distance education centers.Have better access to advisors.Have classes required that relate to your major.Have closer relationship wtih new transfer students. Help them get the ball rolling in their majors.Have congruency within the colleges--I was going to do a double major with social work and FHD. The requirements were ridiculous!Have enough advisors to accomodate the students.Have everybody on the same page. Sometimes I wasn't given enough information and not told I needed certain classes until too late.Have extended hours. Most people don't bother to make appointments--don't get the help they need and end up taking the wrong classes.Have extension personnel be just as knowledgable as advisor.Have it online.Have just one advisor for everything, not general advisors and major advisors and have them outline an exact schedule.Have longer hours on day sworked, or at least begin their day more afternoon. That was just to fit my schedule, however.Have longer office hours.Have more advisors available.Have more advisors for voice students.Have more advisors in all depts that are as equal help and available as was mine.Have more advisors in art. We all go to Marcia Roberts, the secretary, because somtimes there isn't anyone else. Not consistent in knowing what's current for requirements.Have more advisors in my college so that accessing time with advisor is easier.Have more advisors on during the first 3 weeks of a new semester.Have more advisors so that it is easier to schedule an appointment.Have more advisors, especially in HASS advising center, so they are more available.Have more advisors.Have more advisors. Keep track of students.Have more advisors. When they get rid of a program, they need to know what is going on instead of finding out info as they go.Have more advisors. Have students meet their advisors more than a week in advance from their registration time.Have more and better advisors is all the other colleges!Have more availability. Sometimes it's hard to fit an appointment into my schedule.Have more available times to meet with advisors.Have more career options readily accessible.Have more hours available!Have more hours during the busy times of the year.Have more information at their office vs. finding it out on my own.

F - 13

Have more people with Kathy's authority. Often she is the only person able to sign or authorize something. She's good, but the volume of work is sufficient for two people.Have more specialized advisors to allow for better access for students. That would require adding more advisors to USU. If it weren't for my advisor I would still be floating through classes at USU.Have more than one advisor for the engineering department because it can be hard to get an appointment with her, especially at the beginning of the Have more than one advisor.Have more than one advisor/counselor (Name) for the college of engineering.Have more than one person for engineering department. Kathy has so many people meeting with her that it's hard to get an appointment.Have office hours not just for classes, but specifically for advising purposes.Have one advisor for each course of study.Have one individual know the answers as opposed to having to go to several people.Have online QUAD system to specifically show graduation deficiencies and progress. Not just transcripts. Like a major requirement sheet that is filled in by the school.Have only one advisor for both your college and general.Have Sally Peterson train all advisors how to be the best at what they are supposed to be doing.Have someone available to answer quick questions.Have teachers encourage students to talk to advisors.Have the advanced standing (specific to my major) advisor be my advisor from the beginning--don't change advisors.Have the advisor available more days of the week.Have the advisors be familiar with the system and know what they're doing so they don't give incorrect or conflicting information.Have the advisors make more time available to meet with them. Give them better training on what they need to know.Have the advisors meet with their students every couple months--have these meeting be mandatory.Have the advisors visit the distant sites at least once every semester.Have the general business advisors know more about what is going on.Have the teachers more involved in advising, and earlier. If students were more involved with the faculty of their respective majors, they would be able to avoid taking courses that just put them behind on the road to graduation.Have them let you know how you can get finished fastest!Have then be there duruing their open office hours.Have two advisors for accounting because there is always a wait to talk to Frank Shuman.Have two for each program/department because if one isn't available, the other can be. They will have to get together and share info or students could just be assigned to one or the other and then it would be split up.Have updated major requirement sheets that always correspond to the semester's schedule for classes.Having more advisors for the general business students.Having more general knowledge about jobs and job placement.Having more open times when students can drop in to meet would help out a lot.Having someone that is a busy teacher as well as an advisor is difficult. Not always do they have the time necessary to give. Should change when a student can meet with their major advisor. I did not receive Advanced Standing until rather late and was

F - 14

Having the advisors actually know what is going on.Having the advisors contact the students and have them meet at least once, soon after they are assigned to the student.Having them keep their students updated on any changes and being well informed about them so they can answer any specific and detailed questions concerning the change.Having your advisor be able to remove more holds and have more information in my major. Being less of a meanie. She isn't nice.he was too busy to spend addquate time discussing things.Help find sources of employment and encourage students to be looking at the different areas of employment fields.Help get into classes needed, refer professors and great general classes, give advice on what classes would work well together for work load and be complimentry to each other. Give options wtihin major of different areas to emphasize and what the differHelp give ideas of where they may possibly work after comppletion of a degree in nutrition science! The next step after graduating!Help sesesions wtih alrge groups explaining to each major what they need to take to graduate each semester.Help students get internships and prepared to work in their field.Help students more as freshmen and sophomores to understand and plan their future.Help students to graduate faster.Help the student through his/her entire degree program and find classes applicable to a particular emphasis or interest.Help undeclared students find a major so someone will begin to help them.Help us if we are minoring in a different area. Give us an advisor in that area.Help us to better know dates for important submissions. Many are not posted and the only way I found out was through other students or a too-late reminder from the department.Hire another counselor for the BIS. There are a lot of students here.Hire more advisors so there is less bottlenecking.Hire more advisors.Hire Thimmes back.Honestly, No improvements.I'm interested in transporation eng. and I wish I could talk to more than just Dr. Chan.I'm of the opinion few students aren't aware of the benefits of meeting with their advisor--intimidation or for whatever reason. Student awareness could be I've heard that in other majors/departments, students have trouble contacting their advisors, let alone being helped. A lot of times they don't know what the student needs to do or classes to take that would help them. Students are left to guess. ButI've never had a problem.I've never really had a bad experience with it, so I'm not sure.I've only seem one problem and that was when I amiled all of the necessary documents for my background check to USU and when they were sorted, some were misplaced. However, Sylvia straightened everything out so I didn't have to redo any of them.II II actually think the advising system is doing really well. I din't know what I would change.I always had to wait a long time before I could see my advisor. She was usually booked for about 3 weeks. Sometimes I had important questions and I couldn't wait that long. Also, I couldn't ask her questions over the phone.

F - 15

I am overall satisfied with this system.I am pleased.I am satisfied with the current advising system.I appreciate that our advisors came into the classroom to speak with us about important matters.I believe the advising center is under staffed.I can't think of anything.I can always get in to see my major advisor, but my HASS advisor is always a long wait--very frustrating.I can decide easily.I cannot think of any needed improvements.I could meet my advisor when I was in a hurry. I should make an appointment one or two weeks before. sometimes it makes me irritated.I couldn't be happier. No suggestions!I did make an appointment once and was frustrated with the busy schedule, but that's life. I got the help I needed.I did not have a "real" advisor. I was told to just talk to a professor in the department, so they didn't really know exactly the things I was after because it was not their first priority.I didn't get the help I needed from advisors. No one stressed the importance of one so I didn't get through college in the time I should have.I didn't know about Grad. App., Utah Licensing, etc. until I went to my advisor. Had I not gone for something else, I wouldn't have known.I didn't know who my advisor was until a few years after going to school. I always just asked Marcia, who was a great resource to me. The advisor is much harder to find.I didn't really encounter any problems or see anything that needs improvement.I didn't start seeing an advisor until I'd been in school a year or two. Maybe teh importance of seeing them should be stressed.I didn't visit with my advisor enough to fill out this section.I didn't want my advisors to be changed that many times. Because of my major, my new advisor didn't know much about the major. Departments should tell students who is the new advisor and how we can contact him/her in advance.I don't even know who my faculty advisor is.I don't feel that all advisors at USU are qualified, have the time, or make it enough of a priority, i.e. the interior design advisor, the department from where I don't feel that my academic advisor has a friendly, welcoming office environment or attitude when I go to meet with her, scheduled or unscheduled.I don't have any complaints.I don't have any criticisms.I don't know because I am unfamiliar with the system. I left school for five years and came back and only met with my advisor one time.I don't know enough about it to have criticisms of its management.I don't know the program well enough to say.I don't know what the "advising system" is. Maybe education about that would be a start.I don't know.I don't know. I don't know the advising system well.I don't know. I think both my departments are doing well.I don't know. Jana Kay kicks ass.I don't like how my counselor for my major can't advise me on my generals. It's a hassle going back and forth.

F - 16

I don't really feel he was overly willing to help me.I don't really know.I don't see any need for improvement. Sylvia Robinson is very thorough, positive, sincerely caring, and altogether wonderful!I don't think my advisor should change anything. She is great!I feel he needs to be more helpful. I was told things in the past that were misleading. He is hard to get a hold of also. But I know he likes being the advsior. I just feel he needs to spend more time with each student.I feel it's greatI feel like advisors should help students become more aware of extra curricular activities and extra programs that would benefit students in job placement. Also, taking mroe of a personal interest in students would make students feel more valued in suchI feel like there is probably done more at the Logan campus to help students have more career opportunities than is offered for those at the extension sites. I would have liked to be more informed in such things.I feel that it has been improved with Ronnie Green. She doesn't make you feel stupid or say things like "I can't believe you didn't know that." Very friendly and helpful. She will go out of her way to help you but still doesn't do it all for you.I feel that it would be good if sometimes they came to us. Sometimes I hear information from other studnets when it should be the advisor's job.I feel that the FCHD advising department was an extremely helpful system. However, when I was in the major I was before FCHD, I felt that the advisor was not concerned wtih having the students succeed, but was weeding them out.I feel they did great. No improvement ideas.I felt that I learned more informaiton from other students. I felt like there was miscommunication between my advisor and me at times, but overall it was I first declared a biology major. (Name) was my advisor. Because of him I changed majors. He was very reluctant to help as well as discouraging to me with my academic goals. Sally has been a great help and motivator.I first went to Chris Coray to be advised, but after receiving no help, I went to Jim instead. Chris Coray was condescending and I did not appreciate it.I found it to be perfectly adequate. Both Marilyn Kruse and Susan Ericksen were great advisors.I found it very unpleasant to go and talk to my advisor. It is rarely helpful to be advised by such a pessimist.I found that my advisor did not seem to care about my own career goals. He just slammed a bunch of his own personal ideas down my throat and was usually in a rush to get me out of his hair.I had a different advisor every time I went in. Hopefully International Studies will have better structure in the future.I had a good experience.I had a great experience with my advisor, therefore I guess that the system is working well.I had a great experience.I had a particularly difficult time obtaining an appointment with my advisor. Appointments should be easier to obtain and the advisor should know readily exactly what the student needs to graduate and be sincerely interested in each student's success, bI had a really positive experience so I would say nothing.I had a very satisfactory experience--nothing I can think of.I had different advisors, but sometimes I could not believe how much they would make me run around for a simple answer that could've been given to me if they would've made a phone call!!!! Peggy is not one of them.I had no trouble.

F - 17

I had one advisor (ID Number) that just didn't seem to care where I was at in my program or what I was doing and I think advisors like that should not be advising students.I had one advisor that wouldn't take time to help me and gave me bad advice on classes to take which made me take extra classes.I had questions for my minor and no one in the history department could or would answer them. They said because I was a minor I didn't have an advisor and I should be able to figure out everything from the sheet.I had schedules made for me and then I'd find out the classes weren't even offered. So know the classes! Also give better updates on signing up for level 4 in summer as well as student teaching in preschool.I had to make an appointment to see my advisor one week before most of the time because she was all booked. I wish there had been one more advisor in my department.I had very little help planning out a graduate course of study.I hated the advising system because the advisors did not care any if you could get a hold of them they really wouldn't help anyway. I transferred all my advising to Robert Schmidt and he has helped me a lot.I have always met with a peer advisor, so I don't have much experience with my advisor. I felt that my peer advisor was always able to help me.I have been frustrated with the unorganization. Lots of us in this major feel lost and uninformed, especially in regard to internships. He never returned emails or calls quickly if at all.I have been nothing but impressed by my advisor. She is excellent.I have been served well, so not much improvement. Maybe consistent advisor help for the summer months if possible.I have been told wrong or not enough information my entire college career. I never felt like the advisors understood my goals. If we could have a more personal relationship, but there are too many students.I have credits that were transferred, but didn't go through the system correctly. Almost every semester I've had to personally go to the registrar and my advisor to work and rework them out.I have done my education through the extension. Some of the questions don't apply. I have worked with Hyram Hall and he has been great.I have had at least 4 advisors during my 3 years here. It makes things confusing. A more permanent advisor would be nice.I have had three different advisors since I startede here at USU three years ago. So far, my current advisor is the only one of the three that has helped I have had three different advisors while I've been here and I don't feel like any of them were interested or cared about my academic career. No one ever did anything extra to help me out.I have heard negative things about other advisors--all advisors should be well educated in all the ins and outs of their college and should be personable and accountable to all students.I have heard that some advisors aren't willing to spend the time with the students and are sometimes not willing to help.I have known a lot of people that have been very frustrated with the advising system at USU. They have gotten the run around from different departmetns, saying, "You don't need to talk to us, talk to another department." And then that department says thI have no advise nor any complaints.I have no complaints.I have no complaints. I was met with and delt with promptly!I have no complaints. Marriane has always been quick to respond to my phone calls.I have no idea, but HASS wasn't much help.I have no problems with it.

F - 18

I have no suggestions.I have seen how overworked advisors are. We need more of them that enjoy their jobs.I have zero complaints. I got lucky, I guess.I just wish I had declared my major earlier.I knew my advisor was new, but he needed to be educated a little more.I knew what I wanted to be before I ever came to college, yet I was a junior before I could meet with an advisor in my major. This is SICK and WRONG!I know it would be hard, but it would be great to see Sylvia each semester before registration so we know what our schedules will be like. The extension sites are a bit different than Logan as far as scheduling.I know that I was assigned an advisor, but I didn't ever get together with him. Others in the CEE office helped me with everything I needed. It would have been nice to have a scheduled time to meet with my advisor when I was accepted into the program.I like everything about it, except maybe the long lines and scheduling an appointment 2 weeks in advance.I like it. My advisor was always available.I like Weber State General Catalog. It's wonderful! Copy it!I need my options all explained to me, like grad school, other majors or minors that might be beneficial.I never had the same advisor when I went in. I had to start from ground zero each time I met with my advisor and that was frustrating.I never met with mine.I only had some small questions that could have been answered in five minutes or less. If the advising offiice had most of the advisors take appointments and one just for walkins and phone calls, that would be perfect.I owe my advising to other people other than my advisor. Thanks to them, I am doing alright. Maybe make sure all your advisors know what they're doing and put enough effort into it.I personally like the chocolate candy better than the hard candy.I really believe it is working okay. I had a schedule that didn't allow me the time I needed to meet with my advisor, but he did everything he could over the phone or through emails. He does a good job.I really like the system I'm involved in.I really thought my advising was great.I should have mapped out every semester's classes from beginning to graduation.I sometimes feel that my advisor is impatient and looks down on me. I would have liked more information about practicum application deadlines.I started in the Chemistry Department, but the advisors there did not care about my need or even about my major in teaching. After a year, I switched majors and advisors.I think a lot of students aren't even aware who their advisor is, or how to make an appointment. Just a letter letting new students know this information I think advising should be just a bit more personal. My advisor was not very personable. I feel they should be someone that I could get a reference from, or is more interested in seeing me.I think advisors and the advising system should advertise the importance of seeing their advisors--students get lazy!I think advisors need to be required to take a class on how to be an effective advisor. They need to learn their job responsibilities and both major requirements and gen ed requirements. We are going to school to gain skills for our future careers. AdI think everything is quite good.I think it's doing good.

F - 19

I think it's fine.I think it's great how it is.I think it's great.I think it's great. I can't suggest anything. She emailed me and contacted me like I was her only student.I think it's pretty good already.I think it's up to a student to take initiative to meet with advisor, if the student does their part it is good.I think it could be more automated instead of having to see an advisor so much. There should be a program which places the classes taken into requirements filled so you can always see exactly where you are and what you need to take.I think it is fine the way it is.I think it is fine.I think it is good as it is.I think it is great--I have very few complaints.I think it would help to have a 4 year plan knowing what classes are needed.I think my advisor did a great job.I think my advisor did a great job. I have had other advisors that did not do half as well.I think my advisor is on a mission. It would be cool to have another one.I think my advisor should have more faculty present to teach so that they could spend more time advising and a little less time teaching. I feel that they are overwhelmed.I think students need to be encouraged to meet with their advisords on a more regular basis.I think that having it be required to meet with your advisor once every semester would help both the student and the advisor.I think that it is doing well.I think that some of the advisors I met with were kind of pessimistic to when I wanted to graduate and didn't have any problems graduating when I I think that they do a good job. Mary is great! She helped me get done quickly with great advice.I think the advisor I had was excellent but I think the main thing to apply in advising is availability of advisor, and also more orientation since the begininning. This means having more touch between the advisor and the student.I think the advisor should get a list of everyone they're over each semester and try to get at least one meeting with them. They should also go to the classes they're over and introduce themselves.I think the advisors are good, but in the beginning it was a little difficult to find out where to go and whom to talk to.I think the advisors need to reutrn phone calls, especially after numerous calls. To be honest, most advisors are good with that but there is one that never did after 7 weeks of trying to get in touch with her before I came to school. Finally my dad caI think the advisors should be more friendly. The time I met with my advisor, she was very rude.I think the elementary education department is fine, but I hear engineering majors hate meeting with their advisor. Hire more advisors for other I think the undecided advising needs to try and help more than to make sure students know how to register. Perhaps more information about majors.I think there is nothing to improve.I think there need to be more checks and balances. I also associated with another advisor (Name) whose job description seems hazy. He did nothing to help me but instead threw his hands in the air and portrayed that he had no control. But heI think they are doing great.

F - 20

I think they are doing pretty well.I transfered from a school and tried to call many times to see if I could plan my schedule to attend here. It seemed as if we played phone tag and I could never reach her. I also made an appointment once over the phone and she wasn't there.I was "assigned" an advisor that did not have a clue about what "water" classes I needed to take.I was 100% satisfied.I was a student athlete and was advised by Andy Anderson (Pre-med) and Brian Evans. Not once did I see a biology advisor. It's amazing I have met all my requirements somehow.I was an art major and as a transfer student, I did not receive the advising that was needed. Their advisor stinks! They need a REAL advising office and not just secretaries. They need someone who knows all about the academics!I was given inaccurate information which led to an extra semester because of one class. I was told I could not take a class simultaneously with its prerequisit. I found out half way through the semester that I could have. Please make sure the advice iI was misinformed when I transferred to USU, and due to my own lack of knowledge of USU and program requirements, I relied on my advisor. Improvements could be made in educating advisors of requirements and specific situations.I was never assigned one counselor, whoever was available I went to.I was not allowed to meet with my advisor because they had peer advisors to meet with students. Because the peer advisor directed me wrong a full year was added to my college. I think had I just met with my advisor this wouldn't have happened.I was very pleased with how it has been conducted.I went to (ID Number of Advisor) once and had a lousy experience. She'e gone now, but I don't know who is more typical of advisors in general, I wish I could have been more educated about my Gen. Ed. possibilities. Better accessibility with advisor.I wish I could have met with my advisor a little more, but it worked out fine.I wish my advisor cared about me and my education. I was just a number--that's what I felt like.I wish my advisor would have sat me down as a freshman and explained in detail and bluntly why I would need to follow the plan recommended and not drop essential classes because I didn't think I could handle it at the time, when I probably could have, anI wish someone would have sat down and planned out what classes to take each semester for all 4 years. I was very frustrated because I didn't know certain classes were only offered certain semesters. Make sure the advisors are nice and happy to help yoI wish that the business advisors would act more professional and place students as the first priority. At times I felt rushed during my visits and was made to feel as if my appointment was a burden to the advising staff. I wish that I had had the oppoI wish the first few meetings/appts. were mandatory or more compulsory to force students to understand where they are in their graduation process, experience, GPA solutions, etc.I wish they knew more about international studies and the jobs I could expect to get and how to get them after graduation.I worked with general business advisor (Ruth Harrison) more. Shouldn't need advanced standing to meet with major advisors.I would have liked an advisor who was friendly and let me choose what I wanted to do rather than tell me what she wanted me to do. I would have liked a more friendly advisor, not someone who was rude.I would have liked the office staff to have been better informed on some commonly asked questions. As it was, the only thing they could do was schedule appointments, even when I only had one question.I would have liked to have been assigned to my advisor sooner than my junior year.I would have liked to have seen a mandatory advisor meeting once a semester.

F - 21

I would like to be able to just pop in and ask a simple question without having to make an appointment, even through a phone call or something. A five second question doesn't need an appointment.I would like to have had a little better advisor in lower division class, like the one I have now.I would like to know more about the different type of jobs that my major is preparing me to do, and not just one or two jobs in the very generals.I would make it a requirement, like at other schools, to meet wiht an advisor once a year.I would recommend that each department hire an advisor and that's all they would do.I would say just explaining why they advise, what they do. For me, I have to know why I am supposed to do something. I don't just accept it.I wouldn't change anything. My advisor was wonderful.If an instructor is the advisor they shgould be more aware of the process and classes needed to graduate.If it was easier to meet with.If my department had a professor approve a late add then why the hell does the registration office have the right to deny it?If only there were more advisors of Kathy's caliber. Gardiner Stiles was supposed to be my advisor, but he was on sabatical and I never even met him.If the advisor took more time to understanding their student's situations they would be able to give a better map for the students to follow.If the advisors were more willing to tell students what different majors required even if it was outside their area.If the requirements were less changeable, the advisors wouldn't have to explain a new system each semester.If the teacher is going to advise the student, he or she needs to do so. I thought I would get advice. Instead, I got a lot of blank stares.If there were more advisors that were trained in career opportunities and could spend one on one time with the students.If they could help us better understand our major and career options, help us to know what scholarships we can apply for, also to provide more information about possible internships, it would be nice if American Studies could have an advisor.If we are better informed as to who they were, and if advisors for majors knew about general ed advising. Only having ONE advisor who actually kept you posted would be great.If you could get all the advisors to be like Donna Minch then things would run like butter! I have complaints about Donna.Improvement in the extensions, especially at Vernal extension. Campus advisor is not knowledgable about anything. Friendly but does not answer pertinent questions.In an "ideal world" it would be faster to get an appointment. However, they are extremely busy.In any and every way. I never got the same answers when I visited. They seemed to find more classes that I needed to take in order to graduate, they couldn't advise me on class schedules very well, and they didn't help much.In bigger colleges, increase the number of advisors.In FHD-CS, there are too many specialized advisors. None of them can help a student with his/her overall program.In my department, nothing.In my field of public relations, there are not many faculty who have experience in promotions or event planning. All teacher hav e a lot of journalism experience, which is great, but many have experience in other forms of PR.In the BA department, alternative required classes weren't made available in course catalog. The only way to know was by word of mouth.In the college of business, they need to make information available at an earlier stage.In the ElEd department, the student teaching advisors should meet with us before level 3 so that we can know what to plan on.Increase the advisor to student ratio.Increased availability.

F - 22

Individual advising offices for HASS located by or in the buildings for the majors.Inform advisors of changes in curriculum.Inform people advising is out there.Inform students about their advisor and the services they provide from the very beginning. Let them know the values of this resource.Inform students better exactly what advisors are for. I'm still not completely sure.Inform us of options related to our program.Information about changes is slow to be distributed.Information on Graduation. No one ever told me I needed to apply for graduation a year in advance.Introduce advisor to student.Is okay.It's always been a positive experience for me.it's fineIt's fine as it is. My wife is a choral education major. She has never had an advisor who gave advice congruent with the advice she received from her other advisors. Their program has had serious problems. The COB has been consistently stellar.It's fine.It's good enough.It's good, but maybe let the student know more about it.It's good.It's great in the FHD department!It's great!It's hard to get in, but I know that probably can't be helped.It's there if you want it. I think it's fine.It's very good.It's wonderful!It can't.It can't. I believe the system is perfect.It could be improved by clarifying who the advisors for the extension students are.It does not need to be improved.It has got to be easier to get an appointment.It is a difficult process, especially if you are a transfer student, to get your credits to transfer. I felt like the staff wasn't very helpful or willing to help you It is a pain being given the runaround from department to department at times.It is difficult to meet the advisors narrow time slots.It is fine.It is hard for students to meet with an on campus advisor when they attend another campus. However, Karen Woolstenhulme in Roosevelt was awesome! She made the needed telephone calls for me.It is hard to get an appointment with (Name).It is hard to meet with them and they gave the wrong info.

F - 23

It is not near stressed enough who your advisor is, why it's important to meet or how they can help. Also, they need to be more proactive and involved in career placement and internship opportunities.It is pretty good, but a lot of times I felt like I was intruding on them. They could be a little more friendly. For the most part, they were nice, though.It is pretty good. I think it would be a good idea if each student was assigned an appointment, then they could call and confirm they were coming. Also, every student would see their advisor one time per semester.It is very difficult to get an appointment that doesn't conflict with class time unless you want to wait a couple of weeks.It seems a heavy load is placed on one advisor in my department.It seems as if most advisors don't have the information they need. Then leave it up to the student to find what they need. At the HPER, you must schedule an apt. a week in advance and fill out a card with the purpose for the apt. When you get there, tIt seems everything is so difficult and a hassle. It would be nice to have some type of list and the order they need to be completed. It is especially hard if you live out of Logan to get everyting completed on-time.It seems like they don't have time for you or want to talk about all of the options with you. They would rather not bother. They have peer advisors to talk to you. But they don't know that much.It seems that Kathy Bayn has far too many students to deal with. I felt like a number the whole time whenever I needed anything from her or her office.It seems that there were some miscommunications between my major advisor and the HASS office. I don't know why, but on the whole, everything It seems the advisors are only available during certain hours of the day.It seems to be doing fine. I'm graduating, right?It should be easier to get into an advisor when you don't have advanced standing or aren't in the program.It sure is hard to get an appointment.It takes a very long time to get in touch with the advisors since there are so few of them.It was hard at the beginning because advisors would just say, "Well, what you want to do?" The journalism advisors are pretty good though.It was hard to find out if I was missing anything for graduation.It was really hard because my advisor changed 3-4 times in a year, because of the family life change, it was difficult because they changed many classes.It was so so.It worked out okay.It worked very well for me.It works well already.It would be a lot easier as a distance education student if we could have the faculty in our area sign our forms and actually be our advisors.It would be great if they could travel to extension sites more than once a semester.It would be great to have the chance to visit with Sylvia and Sheri more often, but being at an extension, it's understandably difficult.It would be helpful to understand the hierarchy better. It's kind of an unsaid misunderstanding.It would be more beneficial to all students if the advising office would schedule appointments during the end and beginning of each semester! It was hard coming to the office having to wait an hour when schedules do not permit.It would be nice if advising were more accessible to distance students.It would be nice if it was indicated on the major requirement sheets which classes are only offered in the fall or the spring.It would be nice if the advisor could visit the extension sites more often.It would be nice if the office hours were at a better time during the day.

F - 24

It would be nice if there was a dedicated advisor in the Chemistry Department. Most of the time advisors had no clue to the required academics. Students propose solutions, advisors just sign.It would be nice if they knew more about all the minor requirements.It would be nice if you weren't sent on a wild goose chase to many different buildings.It would be nice to be contacted and receive updates on new information via email or mail.It would be nice to have advisors at extension sites. They could come down once in a couple of months. This would help extension students have questions answered easily. Also have longer hours for extension conference calls.It would have been nice to have had my advisor available more often and to have had him offer more advice at my appointments. I felt like it was always me talking and planning without his assistance.It would help if advisors could free up their schedule during the beginning and...It would help if they knew the requirements of other science departments. I was told by my advisor that I didn't need to retake a class that I then had to squeeze into my second to last semester.It would help to be treated as an individual and not just another student on my advisor's checklist. She always was in a hurry and acted like I was an annoyance when just asking for help.Josh is awesome.Just always remember to have patience with the student. We're not perfect, we make mistakes, and we don't always try to make your day miserable.Just fix the technology problem.Just make sure that the advisors explain everything so that you don't go in the next time and have them say, "Oh, you need to take this too." A lot of people have been frustrated with that.Keep advisor current on program changes or staff changes instead of students advising the advisor on program changes.Keep advisors better informed about changes in the major requirements.Keep advisors informed with correct info so they are able to give students better info.Keep advisors like Kathy Bayn out of the advisor position. She definitely does not belong in any school as an advisor.Keep advisors staffed.Keep doing great.Keep good advisors around.Keep the quality people.Keep the students more informed about changes in major requirements, etc.Keep things together and marked off better in the computer system. Don't lose paper work. Be more organized.Keep up on when classes are offered in relationship to other class times needed for the major.Keep up the good work.Keep up with current information.Keeping advisors around so that they can get to know you and your situation. I have gone through three advisors within my major in the course of USU.Keeping the requirements more up to date, there are a lot of old copies and papers floating around.Keeping the same system, more correlations.Keeping the students updated on class changes.Know for sure which classes transfer and don't tell me they did not transfer when they did.

F - 25

Know more about students, keep better files on each student--hopefully prevent errors.Know the pertinent information! I went to 3 other advisors who educated me incorrectly of classes I did need, before Lynne Slade told me the correct information. This is horrible! Be consistent!Know who was the advisor and what I was to use him for.Knowing you can go to them for other things and not just with graduation and class schedules.Last semester I had a few simple questions that Kathy answered over email for me. It worked out perfectly. I didn't need to waste any of her time, I didn't have to wait to meet with her and my questions were fully answered. I think that method shouldLay down all of the students options in their field.Learn the job and how to deal with students wants instead of their own.Les helped me out a lot. However, he was not my set advisor. I had a hard time meeting with Brenda Cooper and when I did, she had no clue what was Les was great and did things quickly. It was very efficient.Less bureaucratic.Less student advisors.Less switching around, constant changing get confusing. I don't like student advisors. I'd rather talk to my advisor who knows everything.Less time expected or advisors to attend meeting so they can meet more frequently with students.Less wait time. There were times when I set an apopintment and I had to wait 20 minutes. Advisors should stick to appointment times.Less wait! Not accessible.Let advising come and visit off campus sites once in a while.Let all math ed. students be assigned to Jim Cangelosi since he's the one with all the answers anyway!Let freshmen know better that it exists and how to contact thier advisor.Let kids meet the advisors when they first arrive in an introductory course so they know and meet their advisor.Let me finish sooner.Let new freshmen know how valuable it is to know their advisor.Let students know all requirements for graduation. My advisor never said anything about the 40 credits needed in upper level classes for graduation.Let students know that most advisors don't know about Gen Ed--they only know about major requirements and that you have to go to the college advisors for more info on Gen Ed.Let students know their options like the best opportunity for class availability. Get students finished quicker.Let students know what they must do to graduate instead of hearing through word of mouth.Let students know who their advisors are.Let students know why they are here and what they do.Let the advisors get to know us individually so they can offer advice.Let the student pick their advisor.Let the students know what is available to them and what resources the advisors can be to everyone.Let the students know who their advisor is.Let them be able to sign students out of English 2010 if student shows skill and ability from other classes to be able to write research papers.Let us choose our advisor and not assign them. I chose Dr. Johnson becuase I was assigned first a bad advisor.Let us know of upcoming dates and requirements concerning our majors early on.

F - 26

Let us know what classes we need to have to graduate.Let us more aware of deadlines and the odd core classes needed.Let you know who your advisor is.Letting the department advisor all the requirements for each student to graduate - not just the major requirements - this would prevent the student from having to see two different advisors.List out which classes are needed in a more understandable way.Local advising would be ideal, but due to the unreal nature of having one site, I feel they are doing the best they can.Longer hours of operation.Longer office hours?Longer walk in hours.Look into student histories.Make a system university wide taht involves students and faculty like the NR.Make advisors a little bit more available for students to talk to more often.Make advisors more accessible. It's impossible to make an appointment.Make advisors more easilyi available.Make appointments longer, so when I come in for my appointment I don't have two people ahead of me.Make appt online. Check files better to avoid miscommunication.Make changing a major easier. More flexible hours.Make contact with each student first, send out reminder emails.Make it a little easier to get an appointment.Make it a requirement that you meet with an advisor at least once every year to help students stay on track. I should have made it a priority but didn't. I wish that I had because they are important resources.Make it a requirement to meet with your advisor. I wish someone would have pushed me to meet with her sooner.Make it easier for extension students to find out who their advisor is. My advisor's name is not in our catalog.Make it easier for students to meet with a well informed staff member who wants to help the students succeed. Also, it would be nice if all faculty members, green sheets, and catalog said and required the same things.Make it easier to contact advisor. I had some simple questions and couldn't contact Sally by phone, email, or by going in. I was referred to set up an appointment for about ten days away.Make it easier to get appointments and inform students of how important it is to meet with an advisor often.Make it easier to get appointments faster.Make it easier to get in and see them.Make it easier to know who your advisor is.Make it easier to make appointments and not have to wait so long when scheduled.Make it easier to meet with advisor.Make it mandatory to do some career exploration at the career center. Also make it more of a process.Make it manditory to meet with advisor every semester.Make it manditory to meet with advisors to help students no waste their time and money.

F - 27

Make it more clear where to obtain certain information.Make it more convenient.Make it more personal, more time to meet with the advisor.Make it more personal. Not everyone has the same wants and/or goals!Make it more personalized, maybe with more pre advanced standing advisors.Make it more understandable on paper. There were a lot of class changes while I was here. It's confusing when papers are lost and reodered and what Make it not so intimidating to visit with advisor.Make it possible to meet my advisor. Every time I tried to make an appointment, the secretary told me no. She was very rude.Make it seem like they are there to help you and they have time to help, not that you are bothering them, asking dumb questions and wasting their time because they are too busy and important for you.Make it simpler to make an appointment.Make major requirement sheets easier to understand.Make meeting time shorter then can meet more people or find more advisors.Make more available online. If there is already online information in place, publicize it more. Students who have full-time class loads and work full-time do not have a lot of time to meet with advisors in person.Make more opportunities to meet. Better communication.Make more time for students.Make more time to help students with what classes to take.Make requirements for graduation more clear (GPA, number of credits in different areas).Make requirements more easily accessible.Make rules uniform for each college so there is less confusion on what each person must have for the graduation application. HASS advising needs to process people for graduation quicker. Application for graduation process is a joke. It should be simplMake services and benefits more well known.Make students meet with advisors at least every other year. That way students have more guidance. It is difficult to figure out who my advisor was and there are three. General art, graphic design, and generals. Is there any way to consolidate?Make sure advisors are updated on all information.Make sure advisors keep appointments. I was turned away three times.Make sure all advisors have the same information and let students know about deadlines.Make sure all advisors know all the needed info. Sometimes she had no idea what i was talking about.Make sure all advisors know what they are talking about.Make sure all of the departments are coordinated with each other and the registration office so that records don't get screwed up as much as they do now. Also, HASS needs more advisors. The FCHD department isn't so good at getting you in on short noticMake sure all the advisors are as good as mine.Make sure every advisor is giving every student a progress sheet so they know exactly where they stand. Make sure advisors know the program and that they are disclosing all relevant information. I repeated a class that I didn't need to.Make sure students are aware of all classes still needing to take and specifically what they are missing.Make sure students know all steps to be taken towards graduating.

F - 28

Make sure students plan ahead.Make sure students schedule conflicts are resolved--advise of optional courses better, minors that could be done, etc. Overall quite good though.Make sure that all information is available and in one place. Try not to lose information students either mail in or email. Visit the extension offices at least once a semester.Make sure the advisor is aware if the major requirement sheets really match the necessary classes to graduate wtih the endorsements desired by the hard working student. I learned the hard way even though my advisor was great.Make sure the advisors know who the students are that are assigned to them.Make sure the advisors understand the general education requirements, make sure it is possible to graduate in four years.Make sure they are up to date on everything.Make sure you don't take a class you really don't need.Make sure you have assigned advisors who know what they're doing for each department. My first advisor told me wrong or incomplete information.Make sure, if there are two advisors in a department area of program, that they both know what is required to graduate or get into a program. Make it easier for people to know who to contact, especially when they are just transferred or are coming in asMake the advisors more available.Make the system more available to meet with students.Make them more available to freshmen, not just seniors.Make things more clear. Get all levels on the same page--HASS, landscape, international.Make visiting the advisor a requirement. So the advisor will be more prepared to help the student know what direction to take rather than just giving Making it a requirement for students to visit their advisors. Keep students better informed.Making it easier to get into your advisor.Making sure that we are following through with our requirements to graduate and letting us students know when changes have been made.Making sure the classes advised to take fit the needs for the individual's major.Making the requirements more clear and understood. Have advisors explain the program in detail at the first visit.Mandatory meeting each semester, even if for 5 minutes. Advisors need to be informed and educated as to programs and requirements.Many of the advisors give conflicting information and have no idea what they're talking about.Many students complain that their advisors weem unfriendly/uniterested. When I was LABP, my first advisor was not interested in my goals.Many times they are not sure about the USU policy for some classes. For example: transfer credits.Marilyn Kruso always made me feel rushed and liked me to figure out things after the appointment, which defeated my whole purpose in going in to see Mass email once per semester suggesting students make an appointment to visit their advisor.May to have another person to answer quick questions that students might have.Maybe bring more advisors at the beginning of the school year. It is so hard to get an appointment when you want or one that fits with their schedule and Maybe come down 2 or 3 times a semester, instead of once. She can be actively involved in what we are doing.Maybe contacting the student about deadlines and asking to meet with student if they never have, via email.Maybe have a couple mandatory meetings early on in school career.Maybe have a dedicated office with advisors who only advise and don't have other professional duties. But having my advisor in my college and department makes me feel part of the department.Maybe have a minimum amount of times you have to go to your advisor.

F - 29

Maybe have another official advisor for the dept. I really was never able to just drop in. I always had to set up an appointment and it took another week to get in. Too busy!Maybe have it be mandatory that students meet with their advisor every so often.Maybe have mandatory meetings once a semester.Maybe have more advisors.Maybe have my advisor contact me, just an email or something might be nice.Maybe instruct to choose their own advisor more tailored to their needs after meeting with a general advisor. My advisor was so swamped it was hard to get in and see him.Maybe less students per advisor.Maybe more advising on graduate studies.Maybe more advisors available near scheduling times.Maybe more contact from advisor to student in times when student hasn't seen advisor in a while.Maybe more knowledge about other classes I could take that were related to what I wanted.Maybe quicker appointments.Maybe required meetings with your advisor.Maybe they could be more educated on the graduation process. I seemed to know more than her sometimes.Maybe to be available in evenings.Meet more often with every student (once a semester) to make sure students are taking the right classes.Meet with extension students more often.Meet with incoming freshmen earlier so that career testing can be done earlier. This way, there can be a reduction in the frequency of major changes.Meeting with Concurrent Enrollment students. I'm working on my last term for my Associate degree and never knew that an advisor was available other than my facilitator.Mking a checklist of where/when/who to go in completing graduation applications.More "group" type meetings, including the marketing/sales section.More access to advisor. Hours are few and limited.More access to advisors when etnering USU. I know many new or fairly new students who do not know who their advisor is or how to find out.More accessibility.More accessible advisors who help you figure out what would be most advantageous academically for you.More accessible for use.More accessible, especially during busy times....I know, that's a toughy!More accessible.More accurate info provided to advisors. They know what requirements should be met for the university. Better able to help plan a schedule, not just hand out requirement sheets.More accurate information on the web/advising sheets/class schedules.More accurate information, better able to help with career decisions.More actual advising.More adivosrs.

F - 30

More advertisement of availability to students.More advising hours and more helpers.More advising. Peer advising for smaller questions.More advisor outlining areas. My advisor is in Logan which is a six hour drive from where I live.More advisors and they definitely need to get paid better!More advisors available with more helpful info. More time for students.More advisors available.More advisors because it took me 3 to 4 days to get in.More advisors for FHD. MOre help with practicum placement.More advisors for fresh and soph (more personal.)More advisors for HASS.More advisors for more appointments.More advisors in departments with more students, especially HASS, because it can be hard to meet with advisors when a lot of students show up at the More advisors in each dept.More advisors in the undergrad engineering department.More advisors made available at the begining of each semester.More advisors so the work load would be less on each one.More advisors that could meet when students need them, not at the advisor's convenience. Also make a more rounded degree that would qualify a student for more than one school.More advisors that really care and that are knowledgable.More advisors to get into appointments sooner.More advisors to limit load and cut down on wait during peak periods.More advisors to student ratio.More advisors who really care about the students.More advisors would be a great improvement so that it didn't take so long to get answers.More advisors!More advisors! Getting an appointment wiht mine was virtually impossible!More advisors, and get rid of (Name). Every time I saw her, she told me I wasn't smart enough and would never make it in engineering. Plus she never has time to see you.More advisors, and help you make decisions, not making decisions for you.More advisors, know more about Med and Law school.More advisors, not so much confusion and red tape to do simple things like change majors, sign up for classes, etc.More advisors, tell students their options.More advisors, very low on advisors, very hard to meet with.More advisors.More advisors. Have some that are only part time advisors.More advisors. People advising a lot of students tend to forget some or play favorites.

F - 31

More advisors?More advsiors in order to have a more personal experience.More announced deadlines, be more available.More appointments.More availability for HASS.More availability or more advisors who know all the general requirements and transfer credit info.More availability to meet with advisor. Perhaps more than one per department.More availability.More availability. It's difficult to get an appointment.More availability. More available courses to avoid getting caught without prerequisites. More flexible programs to allow for individual circumstances.More available hours.More available office hours.More available walk in hours.More available.More awareness of importance of meeting with advisors.More benefits for the faculty that advise students wholeheartedly.More career help like placement. The announcements are good, but help more directly with placing students in field they like.More choice afforded students as to who their advisor will be.More classes outside USUMore communication and coherence between transfer student advisor, general ed advisors, music department, and secondary ed. I had to traipse all around campus rather than go to one person. I was so confused much of the time and got conflicting informatMore communication between departments.More communication between departments. More available hours. People who are willing to take the time (not so cranky).More communication to students of requirements without having to meet with the advisor.More communication! Requirements were never clear. Students were not told the same processes; therefore we were left to consult one another and literally piece together important information. Advisement needs to be more than every six months and not lMore contact between advisor and students; better training for new advisors, some kind of encouragement for advisors to care, even with a lot of More convenient hours.More email communication.More emailing about why we need an advisor. What are the benefits?More emails and notes and notification of graduation process.More emails.More emphasis on graduate level goals.More encouragement to visit.More explanation on depth requirements.More frequent visits.More friendly and helpful. Tell me more of the whole story.

F - 32

More friendly. Tell them to help what you want to, not what they think you should do.More funding for full-time advisors.More help with finding internships. Advisor gives good suggestion but no really help with actually getting an internship.More hours or more peer advisors, and better clarification of current requirements for graduation.More hours.More information and encouragement to students about graduate schools (USU and other schools).More information given to students by mail or email such as changes and announcements.More informed advisors to direct you to the classes you need to take. Better communication with university and advisors with requirements.More interest in my academic progress.More involvement of advisor when a student first comes to USU or formally declares a major.More knowledgable advisors in the sense of what classes are available and scholarships.More knowledgable on general requirements.More knowledgable on overall USU regulations and requirements.More like Sally.More man power.More notification to students of policy changes and changes in class schedules.More of a personality match with advisor than random assigning.More of them, get in faster.More of them. It is hard to find a place to go when you don't know what your major is, but you still need to register for classes and try not to waste time.More off campus site counselors/advisors.More office hours available during the week.More office hours in the afternoon.More office hours, more consistency in knowing what specified students need to graduate.More office hours.More online help.More open door policy.more options for Depth classes, etc.More organization and standard time slots.More out-reach from advisor to their students. Example: e-mailing students who have never been to see advisor, or notifying student, suggesting a meeting when they are getting close to graduation.More outreach from advisors to students.More people on staff so it wouldn't be so difficult to make appointments.More people, email you when you can register for next semester.More personal and stop no-showing for appointments.More personal relationship makes it easier to talk with advisor.More positive encouragement.More resources online.

F - 33

More seminars for advisors.More specific advisors.More student-advisor visits.More student advisor visits.More time available to meet.More time for appointments with students.More time for seeing students. It seems like Cathy was always busy doing other things and only a few sports were open to see students. It made it especially hard for graduating seniors with the same schedule and only 4 appointments per week that workedMore times available.More times open for appointments.More use of email to remind and update students.more walk-in hoursMore willing to help with special circumstances.Most advisors are very rushed.Most of my past advisors didn't seem to care. They just wanted me to "help myself" and get out of their office. I wish they were more helpful in giving me suggestions on what comes after college.Most of the advisors I've met with aren't extremely nice and act like everything they do is putting them out. Marilyn Kruse is the only one who has been extremely nice and really tried to help me out.Mostly, they could learn some people skills and not act so "put out" to help a student that needs help. It is also nearly impossible to get an appointment My advising counselor doesn't know a whole lot about the exact requirements. I feel like I doubt him when I leave.My advising experience has been excellent ever since I decided on a major. Most advisors in other depts seem to be too busy and just consider you a number and not a person. Sad, but true.My advising system has been great.My advisor and I have never met in person. I have spoke with her on the phone and when an appointment was made, she had to change it and meet with My advisor cannot help me much because I want to have my major focus in conservation biology, but my professor is teaching wildlife classes. So I think the advising system can be much more helpful if students are given advisors that have similar major oMy advisor changed 3 times in 3 years. Some consistancy would be nice.My advisor changed and the new advisor was still learning in detail the accounting majors. Also I changed majors and after notifying old counselor I still received a flood of emails from her.My advisor didn't really want to help much. Maybe have a math advisor who isn't a professor.My advisor didn't seem to always know what was going on. She didn't really care to help me and just wanted to get me out of her office.My advisor does an excellent job. He takes the time to make sure all questions are answered and keep me on track working towards graduation.My advisor doesn't seem to be interested in me. He would just say, "Do what's on the requirement sheet."My advisor had too many students to deal with. He seemed to lose me in the shuffle and we would go months without talking. It was frustrating at times, but Hyrum was the one advisor I've had that helped me most. I had 5 different advisors in the 3 yeaMy advisor has lots of students to help. She could be better if she didn't have to rush through students to see them all. So maybe more advisors.

F - 34

My advisor is actually supposed to be (Advisor). Nice guy--the problem is he didn't give me any help in my planning with the education part of my major. I should have gone to James Cangelosi a lot sooner. Math Education majors need to be directed toMy advisor is as good as can be, but the Gen. Ed. advising could be faster.My advisor is my violin teacher who is here on a residency with the Fry Street Quartet. she isn't up on all the academic stuff, so I have to figure everything out myself. But she's a great mentor and is helping me figure what I want to do later. If yoMy advisor is way too busy to see me and never responds to phone calls or emails, especially in the summer.My advisor made me feel like I should be able to do it all myself because I am a transfer student. However, I wasn't familiar with how USU runs. I felt so dumb after my first visit that I never returned and decided to do it all on my own. Let us knowMy advisor needs to be more proactive in helping students establish their schedule, know the requirements, know when classes are offered, etc. instead of waiting for students to ask the right questions, because we may not know the right questions.My advisor never asked me what type of jobs I wanted or the area of history I was interested in. When I asked about summer credits he said, "I'm not in contract during the summer, so I really don't care."My advisor never declared my major for me, causing some confusion and problems when I went to apply for graduation.My advisor should be well informed and know exactly where to go to get questions answered. They should know about new requirements for students and keep the students up to date.My advisor was changed multiple times during my career at USU. Also at times my advisor gave me false information.My advisor was hard to track down sometimes.My advisor was near impossible to contact. I took several classes I didn't need because I was advised to.My advisor was never available. I felt like I also knew more about things than he did. He never informed me of things I needed. When I was meeting with him he would always make the appointments short.My advisor was new. She could have been provided better training. I didn't trust that she knew what she was doing so I met with a different advisor just to be safe. IT's not fun to students if their advisor doesn't know. I basically walked her througMy advisor was right on top of everything. I wouldn't change anything.My advisor was very difficult to get in contact with somtimes. He doesn't usually call back or respond to emails. Persistance was the key to catching him in his office. He was good though.My advisor was very impersonal and was always trying to rush me out of his office. He also told me I couldn't possible pass some of the courses in my major and that I should switch majors. I did not appreciate that, but it is one of th reasons I stuckMy advisor wasn't very nice at times. She would tell me the things I needed to do, and when I didn't understand, she got ornery. Nice advisors would be My advisor went on sabbatical.My advisors accessible.My advisors used a lot of older students or grad. students in their office to help figure out schedules. This caused a lot of confusion for me at times. I rarely worked with the actual advisors.My assigned advisor knows nothing so I go to Kathy Bayn (I think she is a general Engr. advisor) or to the CEE office staff. If you're going to assign teachers like (Name) to advise students, they need to know what's going on.My biggest complaint is that I was assigned a departmental advisor who left USU before I could even meet her. I slipped through the cracks after that and have mostly advised myself.My Deaf Edu Advisor was never available, even when I would make appointments.

F - 35

My experience hasn't lent me any reason for improvement.My former advisor didn't even know my name.My freshman year I didn't see the need to meet with my advisor and she/he didn't contact me to my knowledge. I could have taken less elective classes had I met wtih an advisor from the start, had I know I needed to.My initial experience with academic advisors in my freshman and sophomore years was very unimpressive. They did virtually nothing to assist me, and never recommended any resolutions for my academic concerns. My guess is that this lax attitude still perMy major advisor should know a bit more about me before I get there and explain the University process/requirements better.My major was cancelled while I was here and my advisor (Glen Edwards) retired. I was still able to graduate, but was not appointed a new advisor. I took it upon myself to go to Marcia.My most recent advisor was excellent, but other I have had could have been more knowledgable and more concerned for students.My transfer credits were overlooked and I ended up taking a class that already counted toward another class.My true advisor was terrible and never helpe me. He discouraged me from finishing on time and was offensive at times. He was absolutely NO help. Not all advisors do what they are supposed to do: advise.Need more advisors for undergrads.Need more advisors like mine.Need more aid and advice on internships.Need to inform you of everything you need to be doing. Tell more about graduation--give a time line of when to do things.Need to know more about music and music therapy majors in the college of HASS; usually hard to get an appointment to fit with your schedule and theirs; i feel they needed more training and understanding of my field.Need to know the teachers to take from.Needs to be on site advisors for extension sitesNever hire (Advisor Name) again!Never stop improving. They really are doing a wonderful job. They made all the difference for me on deciding my major.new advisorNFS department did not have control over lack of upkeep to student services (i.e. professional grade kitchens). It also would have been nice to talk with the dean directly if she had problems with my graduation requirements (instead of discussing it witNicer staff advisors.no "uncool" advisorsNo changes necessary.No changes need to be made.No comment.No comment. Problem solved when Tooele was restructured fall 2003.no complaintsNo complaints other than maybe less waiting time.No improvement needed.No more run around. Please help me with what I need while I'm talking to you! Advising system could be more helpful, better knowledge as to how the system works.

F - 36

No need for improvement.No suggestions except for I feel that advisors should contact their students more frequently. In my situation I didn't have any problems.No suggestions for improvement. I'm happy with the way it is.None--it's great. They work so hard to accommodate us as students. They are so busy. They are given so many students to be over and there are so few of them (advisors).None-they are wonderful.noneNoneNone at this time.None.Not all of the advisors can help as deeply as Dr. Allen can. Perhaps some advisors need some more training and current information.Not at all! I loved the help I received.Not be so negative about one's chances of success. Have a more of a "sink or swim" attitude.Not changing our advisor so often I have had 4 different ones since I've been here.Not everyone is on the same page.Not friendly, make students feel stupid and inadequate. Not available enough or at good times. Advisor didn't share necessary info unless specifically asked. Advisor not helpful in class planning and recommended course schedules.Not giving the advice that I seek.Not have professors be advisors. Both are full-time jobs and if someone is trying to do both they usually end up slacking or are impossible to meet wtih. That's how I felt with my minor advisor.Not lose documents that are mailed in to advising office.Not make me fill out dumb surveys.Not making any important mistakes that depend on you graduating.not muchNot much.Not necessarily in the college of business, but I've heard that advisors in other colleges don't take the time to really help the students. That should be the main goal for all the advisors no matter what college.Not so long a wait top schedule appointments.Not so many students to one advisor.Not sure how other colleges were, but my advisor was great!Not thought about yet.Not very accomodating in student teaching situations. Could improve on the areas of student teaching offered or various affordable ways to complete this semester of school.Not very courteous. Frank is only available during times when I have class.NothingNothing from my point of view.Nothing I can think of.

F - 37

Nothing I know of.Nothing major is requiredNothing specific.NOTHING!Nothing! Easy to receive answers and set up appointments.Nothing, it's doing just fine.Nothing.Nothing. Everything is great.Nothing. I have been very impressed with my advisor.Nothing. It's great.Notify extension students of dates for appointments further ahead of the date.Notify student if there are any changes.Notify students when major requirements change.Notify us of our advisor assignment. Email us. I did not know where to find out who my advisor was, so I met with a general advisor.Now it's fine.Obtain more fundong so advisors with masters or PHD degrees can be hired. This is especially important for the college of business.Offer timeline of how often to visit advisor.Often the advisors are given a million tasks to head up. They are overwhelmed with their work load and I felt I ought to stay away if I could.On site advisor or monthly visits.Once my major was declared everything was fine. It was help to find a major that was scarce.One advisor for all of the pre-professional engineering is not enough. Even when in the professional program, Kathy is the only one who knew needed information so I would have to go to her anyway.One advisor for everything instead of a HASS advisor and a major advisor.One advisor for everything. I had an English advisor and a HASS advisor.One advisor the whole time.ONE engineering advisor? Almost impossible to get an appointment at the beginning of the year.One of the reasons I never returned to my advisor and eventually changed majors was the ineffectiveness of my advisor. However, the psychology advising department was excellent.One particular advisor (other than listed) informed me it is "pointless" to pursue a graduate degree or MBA program. BAD and incorrect information! Very Online advising with abilities to email back and forth with advisors. Going into an office to meet with an advisor takes time and a lot more effort.Open students to their options, but don't force them into a career they don't want to do just because they have the grades for it.Organize other college advising to be more like the Psych department advising.Originally my advisor was a grad student (whom I never met with). (Advisor Name) was my advisor last year. I met her once. Now Myra Cook is my advisor and she is helpful. So my advice is to work on advisor/employee retention.Our professors need more time and better pay.Overall, doing well.Parking is horrible.

F - 38

past advisors too busyPay them more. They deserve it!Peer/student advising, more helpful advising, giving more advice on schedule and what classes to take.Peggy Butters is the exception to the misery that is the COB Student Service Center. The Dean of the COB should (must!) launch an investigation into the COB Student Service Center in order to regain any credibility to the college. If changes aren't madPerhaps have back-up advisors for emergencies.Perhaps have more advisors so there are less students per advisor.Perhaps require one visit per semester to touch base and make sure you're headed in the right direction. I would have gone to my advisor more often but I felt like I should figure things out myself.Perhaps the system could do a better job of informing students who their advisors are.Plan for times when more advising is needed (beginning/end of each semester.)Plan out schedules better or suggest more classes to students that will fulfill their breadth and depth. Tell the student if they can take a class that takes care of two requirements at once.Possible keep the major advisors more informed to the graduation requirements.Possibly let students select their advisors. I was paired with a great one, but some students like certain professors more.Possibly requiring an advisors signature before registration.Post office hours and stick to them.Postings of pertinent information via email would certainly be advantageous. Major related, deadlines, internships, career oriented functions.Probably by providing more helpful information about graduate schools and job opportunities after graduationProfessors who are advisors need to act as advisors, (know what is expected of students in the curriculum).Promote more visits with advisors more often.Properly document transfer courses.Provide a Kathy Bayne for each engineering department.Provide a scheduled outline of a "planned schedule" to freshmen on courses they should take to graduate from day one.Provide an advisor that takes a personal interest in students and a knowledge of the college system and career building opportunities.Provide better customer service.Provide more advisors with more knowledge of requirements.Provide more advisors.Provide more available "drop in" office hours for help; my class schedule always conflicted with counciling availability times.Provide more in-depth information about class to help you pick which class you would find interesting.Provide more information on "how hard" a class is or on what combination of classes won't create a work load overload.Provide more information on opportunities available in related field on campus through research or interships.Provide website for off-campus students relevant to research and job opportunities.Providing a 1-800 number so people can call their advisors woudn't hurt. That way people who are long distance can talk to their advisors more often.Psychology department was wonderful! However, I had a horrible experience with the Park and Recreation advisor. She was unhelpful and acted as if she did not know what she was doing.Publish course equivalents for other institutions annually.

F - 39

Punctuality--keeping the set/established appointments at the set/given times.Put an advisor in that encourages people to do well.Put Julie Wheeler back on as an advisor for FCSE and pay her more.Quality.Quit changing my advisor every year. I have had 5 business advisors.Quit with the run around. So many times I have had to run from office to office to find someone or something or get something signed. Very frustrating.Recommending more specific courses/career pahts. Suggesting alternative options. Explaining more in depth, everything discussed. Being more open to questions and helping to probe and answer questions satisfactorily based on the students perspecitive.Require an initial meeting with advisor upon entering schools, transfers, major changes, etc.Require or strongly advise new students to meet with their advisor and plan out and identify all options, requirements, possibilities etc. as soon as they start school. I think this would clarify a lot of the misconceptions and misunderstandings.Require students to meet at least once with their advisor.Require students to meet with advisor.Require students to meet with their advisor every other semester.Require students to meet wtih their advisor each semester before registering.Require students to talk to advisor once a year.Require that students meet with advisor. Advisor need to be more aware of what's going on.Require yearly advising for every student.Required to meet with advisorsRequirement sheets are great.Responding in a more timely manner.Right now, it's good. People can only do so much. I think they make the best of their time and are concerned about the general welfare of the students.Running on time because I have to wait for 30 minutes sometimes before I got to see her.Ruth Harrison did not seem to care or want me to succeed.Sally Peterson in the academic counseling center was my main source for help. However, Gary Amano was good for music stuff. Sally was great for Same as above.Schedule breaks between appointments so the next apt. can start on time and keep to schedule.Schedule yearly or bi-yearly visits with students so that perhaps reluctant students like myself would be helped with keeping on track.Scheduled visits to distance education locations for persona meetings with distance Ed. students.Scheduling courses, more advisors, more patience.Scheduling. Physics Department doesn't need this improvement.Seek out the students more.Seem interested in what the students are doing.Seems great to me.Seems Okay.Semester meeting schedule.

F - 40

Send an email to all students within the major each semester to let them know advising is available for them. Some students don't even know who their advisor is, and odn't bother dealing with them.Send an email/phone call requesting to meet with you.Send out notices regarding deadline changes for graduation. Don't leave it to ESP!Send out reminders of deadlines to students via email or some other method. Possibly send out reminders to each student to meet with his advisor at the beginning of the semester.Send out requirements and reminders to students.Send personal emails to keep us informed of general changes.Set breaks between appointments so if one goes over, the next one can still start on time.Set up a four year plan as a freshman. Also, I would have liked to have known earlier my options for getting a minor.She's too busy. Get one more.She did an excellent job. She really knows what she is doing and how to help.She is never in her office except when we are in classes or practicum.She is so busy just before the school starts a semester.She was great and very nice, but sometimes she was busy and stressed and seemed to lose her patience.She wasn't nice. She gave poor or incomplete information and everything was always a big run around.Shorter waiting time to get an appointment.Should not expect students to know about all the extra deadlines and applications.Show more interest in graduate performance in work field after graduation.Show more interest in students and their concerns. It's important to help them complete their major, but help them decide if it is really the major they want to complete.Show students how to track their own progress.Simply being just a little more extrovertive towards undeclared major at USU. Help them get on the path early, because they are the ones who need the Since changing my major I have been happy with my advisor, but before hand they were a constant source of misinformation nor did they care about students issues with registration. The requirements for my previous major changed so often I finally changedSince I am going to school in Rich High, I wish I could meet with Josh Hunter more, but I am still doing fine with the advising here.Since Sylvia is on the road so much it makes it hard to get a hold of her if I needed a question answered real quick.Since the apparel and textile major has been changed, no one wants to help us. I also just found out today that there are two additional classes I have to take in the spring when all of my advisors have told me that I was done except the three I plannedSmaller caseloads for the poor advisors!Smaller student advisor ratio.Some advisors and other faculty members are not accomodating to meet with students and answer questions.Some advisors I met with when first attending USU weren't as knowledgable or well informed, and there were times I was told incorrect information or left discouraged because I was told there was basically no hope.Some advisors need to be a little more helpful when a student's parents are helping the student get into a program and can't do it themselves.Some majors have advisors hired from outside the program. While they know the requirements than can people virtually no information helpful to choosing electives in and out of the major requirements.

F - 41

Some of my first advisors did not take the time for me.Some of the advisors could be better and more willing to spend time to help.Sometimes hard to get in to see advisor on short notice.Sometimes it seemed like things were unorganized. I hated when things were all backed. But that's life.Sometimes it seems they don't care so much.Sometimes the advisors aren't extremely helpful. Start advising incoming freshmen more. When I was a freshman, mine didn't really help a whole lot.Sometimes the advisors don't know all the rules or information. Maybe if the advisors had more information would be great.Sometimes they are not friendly and not very helpful.Sometimes they were not quite sure on how college of education requirements worked.Sometimes when I speak with a different advisor, they tell me something different than before. I know I will get the most accurate and up-to-date information from Isabel.Somtimes I really need to see her and I have to wait a few days for an appointment. It is very annoying.Special Ed. needs to have another advisor becuase Darcie is spread too thin and has to be out of the office too much. We need two Darcies.Stop having faculty that teach large classes as advisors. They are too busy. Also the problem with teachers that advise is they are biased in how they interact with students. If they never taught you, they don't care about you at all.Stop moving offices. More advisors available during busy times.Stream line paper work, hire more people like Sally Peterson.Stronger push towards fulfilling requirements.Student center at the COB needs to care and be more understanding. I felt like no one listened or was willing to help. I'm capable of choosing classes, but I need input and explanations.Students have good access to advisors.Students should be encouraged more often and everyone should be able to have Marera!System of requirements is confusing and changes are not adequately announced.Take a lesson from Ron Godfrey. He was good at it. Advisors need to be available for the students. Some advisors are too busy to meet with students in a timely manner.Take an interest in students progress. Don't act like it's some huge inconvenience to meet with a student.Take care of internship credits clearer and faster!Take out peer advisors.Taking a personal interest in the students would be nice.Teach the advisors to be happy and not bothered when you ask for help. Have the advisors visit some classes so they actually know more about the class than I do from reading the title.Teach them how to be adivsors.Tell advisors about new changes (they probably do).Tell more fully exactly what will have to be done and the deadlines.Tell people everything at the beginning, educate advisors!Tell students how SOAR grad. packets need to be done.Tell students of opportunities/what's required!

F - 42

Tell the student exactly what to do.Telling what classes are needed before hand.The advising during the pre-engineering classes was not helpful and frustrating.The advising system as a whole is in a good shape, however, whenever I went to the registration office for advice or to do something else, I found them rude and totally unaccomodating, the staff in the registration office has absolutely no human resourceThe advising system for general requirements needs to advise students better in what is required of them in general categories.The advising system should focus more attention on helping students obtain internships, and other work related experiences.The advisor from my local office was not very good. She was uninformed and usually didn't help in planning my education. Thankfully, she is gone. We really need an on site part time advisor at the Emery Center.The advisor may keep us better informed and give us options.The advisor needs set hours and to start the appointment at the right time.The advisor needs to have better hours, be easier to see and get an appointment with.The advisor should contact the student.The advisors actually caring.The advisors are excellent. I just wish I weren't so far away. I'm sure it's hard for the advisors to come clear to Vernal very often. Maybe hire advisors in Vernal in more majors.The advisors could ask more about my goals for life, career, and academics to help me create a better plan for my future. I don't feel like they care enough about me.The advisors could be more informed on USU requirements.The advisors could know more about the degrees being offered, classes being offered in advance for each semester. Help advise, help wtih graduation and line up classes for students who only need a few more classes to graduate.The advisors disagree with the proper way to fill out papers and are hard to get an appointment with. If you get an appointment, you still have to wait when you get there.The advisors do not know all that the major entails so you end up having to figure it out yourself or ask the faculty. I found the advisors really seemed to know nothing about the specifics of the major which is what I needed help with the most.The advisors don't seem to really know which classes students need to take. They assume the student knows that.The advisors need a little more power so students don't have to run around to places around campus to do something as simple as changing a major.The advisors need more information. They need to be aware of requirements and how to get us quickly through our degrees. It's part of their job. They should be trained for it just like they hae for the academic part.The advisors need to be better trained.The advisors need to be more concerned with the students and what they are doing.The advisors need to be more student friendly and more knowledgable about the curriculum.The advisors need to give correct information. Sometimes I knew more than my advisor. They are not really very helpful.The advisors should be more up to date on the needs and requirements they are supposed to.The advisors should make more of an effort to meet with their students and make sure everything is in order.The advisors shouldn't be weighed down with too many responsibilities outside of advising. It is an important job.The advisors that you see before you obtain advanced standing and the ones you see afterward do not seem to communicate well.

F - 43

The availability of college advisors could be improved.The available time to meet with advisors is often small and not very often. Most of the time the advisor's schedule for advising is during my classes.The business undergraduate gets advance standing--those advisors need to give transfer students more time and explain everything a little better about graduation requirements.The computer system should recognize Associate degree to save many headaches over graduation issues.The computer systems from the advisors to admissions office should be synchronized when changes are made.The education advisors are really busy running around doing other things for their jobs. At times it took two weeks to get in. Make it so they can see the students more and don't have to run around so much.The electrical engineering department has only a couple professors that fulfill responsibilities as an advisor. More advisors within the department would be a benefit to students.The engineering freshman and sophomore years have one person the entire time and one advisor for the entier school. Not very good.The General Business advisors weren't too knowledgable, especially with transfer students from junior colleges.The General Ed Advisor was confusing. The department advisors need authority over G.E. advisement, or better yet, do away with G.E. and breadth The graduation application process is redundant.The HASS advising (general, not my specific advisor) could be more time-sensitive in answering students questions or meeting with them in regards to general education.The HASS advising center is a complete joke. Numerous times they have misled me and other students. Their mistakes are countless, and due to their stupidity, I have wasted time and money taking classes I didn't need. They ought to be punished and I ouThe HASS advising system could be a little more friendly. Sometimes they are short with students. Sometimes I hear them speak negatively about other The HASS specializes in Gen Ed vs. Major advisors. One problem is the turnaround for grad applications (dean's signature) in the colleges. Business is one week, Ed is 1-2 hours, HASS is over 3 weeks.The internet could be improved. Information is hard to find on the school site. It needs to be more user friendly and have better searches and indexes. INfo in the course catalog, such as breadth and University Depth requirements and course listings aThe lines are long in General Advisement.The majority of my experiences with my advisor, I left feeling negative about finishing school because I was not receiving any positive advice. I also found myself short of credits forcing me to cram my schedule because I allowed my advisor to tell me wThe most important thing is the advisors' working attitude. I heard a lot from my classmates and friends who have uncomfortable experiences when they meet with their advisors. They usually argued the experiences such as they felt the advisors didn't reThe only problem I had was getting in with the particular advisor that I wanted, but I understood that it was just busy.The only thing I don't like is that I can't get an appointment at the beginning of the semester. IT is very frustrating sometimes.The other faculty don't seem to know the requirements as well as the secretary.The overall advising system as USU has a very large area for improvement. Each advisor gives different information. Maybe training would help get them all together.The political science advising system is doing well.The political science dept. needs an advisor that can advise on the general requirements so I do not have to schedule my advising around undeclared The professional program advisors just send you back to the pre-prof advisor.

F - 44

The professors are not always helpful. They often times are not very helpful. Perhaps each department should have an advisor like Kathy Bayne once a student reaches the professional program.The professors are not helpful at all. My academic advisor assigned to me when I entered the professional program hasn't helped me at all.The run around should be limited. Your advisor should know everything you need to graduate. Going to the college, especially one as big as HASS, isn't The science/HASS advising center is way understaffed. It takes months to get in at times for an appointment. Advisors could be more available to The time advisor is available should be longer, especially at the beginning of the semester.The undergrad dept. for business is horrible. They're rude to the students and aren't very helpful in getting to graduation.The undergraduate advisors know nothing about advising students on graduate school.The university needs to stop changing the requirements for graduation. It makes it very confusing for the advisor and the students.The whole Jcomm Department needs major help in their advising abilities. They know nothing about requirements beyond their department.There's always a long line to see my advisor, even 2 days in advance and you always wait 20 minutes past your apointment to get in. Don't know how to fix it but it would create an impoved system.There are a lot of students to be served. Maybe with more advisors it could become more personal.There are many areas that are not working together. Major advisors have no clue about general education requirements.There are no changes needed that I can see.There are not enough advisors for the number of students that need to be taken care of. More advisors are needed!There are too many students to advisors. 900 to 1 is not what I call student friendly.There are too many students to each advisor.There is a lot at this university that needs improvement. (Advisor Name) was better than (Advisor Name) because she had less she had to do, I think. (Advisor Name) has too many students.There is no need for improvement.There is not enough time given in appointments.There is way too much "red tape" to meet your advisor. Also advisors, especially upper-level ones, need more office time.There must be coordination and training. Often two different advisors gave me conflicting information.There need to be more advisors for each major; even though my main advisor is Prof. Johnson, I'm not officially tied to her and I have to go through Marcia Koburts to get anything changed in the system, which can sometimes be a really big hassel.There needs to be more more advisors or more time available for each advisor.There needs to be someone who is located at the Uintah Basin Branch Campus who is capable of advising students better. I was able to get NO help regarding my accounting degree and I was not sure what classes to take. We just need more help.There needs to be uniformity in different advisors answers to the same question-what do I need to graduate?There seems to be a lack of communication. If you go to one counselor then switch, nthing you said to the first is retained anywhere.There should be more advisors in each department. One advisor is not enough or else that one advisor should not be teaching other classes.There should be required meetings with your academic advisor. It can be intimidating to achedule a meeting with them yourself. Advisors should be more accessible.There was no advisor who was knowledgable about my program (apparel and textiles). I knew more about my classes than advisors.There were not sufficient advising times in the week. The advisor was only in her office for a few hours a day or not at all. I had to miss class to have an appointment.

F - 45

They're great!They are doing great! I got all the help I needed.They can have class schedules out way in advance so we could plan them before we see the schedule book, so we won't have conflicting classes. Offer upper division courses more than once during a semester.They can learn about other majors so they can better inform students. They can support students and they can be more positive about decisions they They could assign business students that do not have advance standing an advisor instead of just sending them to the advising center.They could be available more often. It would be nice if every day, all day could be "walk in" hours, and if they would be open on fridays too.They could be more available.They could be more proactive (maybe try to find the lost and confused freshmen, rather than waiting for the freshmen to come to them for help, because it may be too late for them). This is for USU in general--not the HPER.They could be of more assistance about how to get into grad school.They could check more close, rather than assume dates for transfer students. I was told by a previous advisor that I did not need some classes. When Hyrum checked, he found that I did.They could help explain the Internet classes a little better.They could inform the students when they need to apply for graduation.They could know more about the requirements for grad. students.They could proactively send more information to me.They could set up a meeting a year to make sure you are on the right track.They could take note and contact students if something is wrong with their chances of graduating or any problem with the transcript, instead of waiting for the uninformed student to contact them.They might have advisors that could meet at the ednet sights more often. I've only met with him once.They need more than one person here in engineering.They need to be more available. It was hard to set up appointments with her somtimes.They need to be more honest with exactly what is going on with classes and what classes to take.They need to be more personal and stop to listen to our requests.They need to be more positive and friendly.They need to k now that they are there to help with your college needs. They shouldn't act like it's a pain to meet with people.They need to know more about related fields and career opportunities. Also, they need to be available more often and know more about the honors They need to know the classes are offered and what classes I need to take.They need to know who all of their students are and contact them at the time they are assigned to invite them to come and visit with them.They need to not take so long to get graduating packet back (it took 4 weeks)!They seem disinterested in being advisors.They should call or email reminders of appointments if made 48 hours or more prior to the date.They should email more often about upcoming deadlines and important information.They should inform you if classes you are planning on taking that are limited semesters/times are cancelled or changed or things so you can get the classes you need before you graduate with no hassle.Time more office hours.

F - 46

To announce to the student who their advisor is.To tell you changes that will happen before it does change.Tom is very difficult to get a hold of. Often times, he doesn't return phone calls, and sometimes he isn't in his office even when appointments are scheduled. Students in the sales/marketing emphasis get pushed to the side and are forgotten about.Too numerous to detail.Total revamp.Train advisors if they have just been put in. I didn't find my advisor very helpful the first time I met her. I like Susan Ericksen because she helped me begin the process of starting my major requirements etc.Train all advisors in major to know general requirements so students have to go to major and HASS advising.Train more staff to be advisors.Train the advisors so they all understand general requirements, breadth and depth requirements, and other standard concerns.Train the advisors you hire. I end up finding the answers to my questions after asking my advisor and then letting my advisors know the answers. I feel like advisors don't know enough about their programs to effectively help the students.Train the teachers how to be good advisors. Especially let them know what their responsibilities are.Train your advisors more explicitly on the ins an outs of requirements.Training for personal advisors for your major SUCKS. I got all my help from the general advisors at the Student Advising Office. Gary Amano, my advisor for music, didn't help at all.Transfer credits, what counts for what.Transfer guide needs to be updated constantly. Courses that are waived never show up in the TG for other students knowledge.Try to be a bit quicker with appointments.try to get everyone in to see themtry to keep all appointmentsTry to remember names.Tyler Bowles is a nice and cooperative advisor in COB. I think reminding students about graduation via email will keep students on their toes.Undergraduate non-advanced standing advisors are horrible. Teach them how to do their jobs.Understand the students needs. Be willing to work with them and take the time to see that they have a good experience. Be more supportive and helpful to those who seek the advice from the advisors. Make sure everyone is informed of the USU requirementUnlimited access to your records/quad. More advisors.Update info more often and be more flexible with students.USU needs to have Class Schedules in advance - not just for the current term. It is difficult to plan your schooling also. Catalogues would help.Visit with students a little more often.We need an advisor in the music department that is NOT also a professor. There is not enough time for them to do both.We need more advisors so you can get wtih your advisor when you need to. They need to communicate wiht their students more often and know what is going on in the field.When a department is eliminated, make the changes before hand, not in the middle of the semester.When calling for information, it would be nice to not be transferred so many times and end up talking to the same person you started with.When collaborating information to show and include student in the process, instead of doing it themselves and then handing it over.

F - 47

When confused about something, ask questions or keep offering suggestions or options to the students, because half the time we don't know what to ask or do in every topic.When I wasn't sure what major to choose, there was no one to help me. I tried several times to get help and I just got a three ring binder of all the majors at USU and was told to look through it. Thankfull, a friend knew someone who could help, even tWhen starting school, tell the student who their advisors are, and where to go for which type of info (office in TSC, or in your own department.)When students meet with the advisor for the first time, the advisor should explain their role in assisting students, and perhaps they could schedule 2 or 3 appointments in advance.When the advisor is gone, no one is available to answer questions.When transfer students come to USU make sure all transfer credit is accounted for when looking at what transfer credit counts for general education Whenever I had to work with other colleges or departments, I had a harder time. It seemed like they didn't want to deal with me because I wasn't one of their students.Who said there was a problem?Why am I assigned a new advisor for the professional program when my pre-professional advisor still takes care of everything? Which advisor do I go With my major (Art Education) it was frustrating when the Ed Dept and the Art Dept didn't communicate changes. I would hear about a new change 3-4 months later. My advisor didn't even know about the changes in the Ed. Department.With the major requirement sheets, give a class description sheet wtih info from catalog or teachers. Description of course.Work harder.Work overload--need more advisors.Working close with the student towards the students future career goals.Working with different types of situations and trying to make it work, rather than just saying no. I had that experience as a transfer student.Yes a lot.You already did by replacing him with a new advisor.You could give everyone the updated information instead of just Kathy. some of my friends had to go far out of their way to catch up when there were unknown class changes in their requirements.You have to sign up really early for an appointment.You make them more available or have more.You might be made aware earlier in your academic career that advisors are there to help you, that's their job.You need to provide more material to help students know what classes they should take and when. Provide information that shows what classes relate to which emphasis.You should have some professors in the major educate the advisors about the classes and the order they should be taken.Total

F - 48

2004 graduating student survey - utah state university student survey - 200… · the graduating...

Documents