1 does agn “feedback” in galaxy clusters work? dave de young noao girdwood ak may 2007

47
1 Does AGN “Feedback” Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters in Galaxy Clusters Work? Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

Upload: rosanna-harmon

Post on 12-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

1

Does AGN “Feedback” in Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work?Galaxy Clusters Work?

Dave De Young

NOAO

Girdwood AK May 2007

Page 2: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

2

AGN Outflows (“Feedback”)AGN Outflows (“Feedback”)

Relevant to Galaxy Formation and Evolution

Relevant to Evolution of the Intracluster Medium and BCGs

Can Provide Information on Unknown Parameters of AGN Formation and Evolution

Page 3: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

3

Galaxy Formation and Galaxy Formation and EvolutionEvolution

Millennium Simulation

1 x 10 Particles; 500 Mpc10 3

Page 4: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

4

Galaxy Formation and Galaxy Formation and EvolutionEvolution

Bower et al. 2003

Page 5: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

5

Galaxy Formation and Galaxy Formation and EvolutionEvolution

– Effects of Radio AGN

Croton et al. 2006

Page 6: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

6

Evolution of The Intracluster Evolution of The Intracluster Medium and BCGsMedium and BCGs

Central Cluster Galaxies Should Now be Accreting ICM, Forming Stars (CDM)

Not Seen– Massive Elliptical Galaxies in Clusters are Old

and Red– No Evidence of Significant Star Formation in

Central BCGs

Page 7: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

7

Evolution of The Intracluster Evolution of The Intracluster Medium and BCGsMedium and BCGs

ICM Cooling Times < Hubble Time in Cores– Inflow Rates Up 100 M(solar) /yr– Not Seen– “Cooling Flow” Problem

Reheating by Cluster AGNOld Idea (~ 1970s) : Total Energies Suggestive

Page 8: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

8

AGN OutflowsAGN Outflows

Key Issue: Coupling of AGN Outflow to Surrounding Medium– Requires Understanding of the Interaction of

AGN Outflows with the Ambient Medium– Exchange of E, M, p– May Constrain Outflow Parameters (v, , )

if Ambient Medium, Interaction Known

Page 9: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

9

Radio Source Bubbles and Radio Source Bubbles and Cooling “Flows”Cooling “Flows”

Total Radio Source Energies (pdV) Are a Significant Fraction of ICM Energy Budget– Need to Convert Kinetic and Particle Energy

into HeatVia Turbulent Mixing with ICMVia Advection and Mixing of ICMVia Shocks in ICM

– Is There Enough Time to Do This?

(cf. B. McNamara)

Page 10: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

10

Models of Buoyant Radio Models of Buoyant Radio Source BubblesSource Bubbles

2-D Hydrodynamic

Abundant

Mixing!

X-Y High Resolution

Brueggen & Kaiser 2002

Density

Page 11: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

11

Models of Buoyant Radio Models of Buoyant Radio Source BubblesSource Bubbles

3-D Hydrodynamic

– Fragmentation, Mixing

Ruszkowski, Bruggen, & Begelman 2004

Page 12: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

12

Self Consistent Global Mixing Calculation Not yet Done.

But It’s Suggestive…

However…

Page 13: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

13

Relic Sources in ClustersRelic Sources in Clusters

N1275

Intact!– At Times >> t

Fabian et al. 2002

instab

Page 14: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

14

Consequences of Relic Radio Consequences of Relic Radio SourcesSources

Role of Magnetic Fields:– Does Bubble Expansion Creates Stabilizing Sheath?

Linear Stability Analysis:– At r ~ 50 kpc, n = 0.01, B = 3 x 10 G:– R-T: l = 13 kpc, t = 7 x 10 yr – K-H: Stable for U ~ 0.1 c

Possible Suppression of Fragmentation or Mixing for a Significant Fraction of Buoyant Risetime

-6

7

s

O O

Page 15: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

15

Current MHD CalculationsCurrent MHD Calculations

Time Dependent Evolution of Buoyant Radio Relics in a Stratified ICM – Look At:

R – T InstabilityLifting and Mixing of Different Elements of the ICMDestruction of Relic and Mixing with ICM

Includes Effects of Central Galaxy + Cluster Includes Inflation of Radio Relic Bubble

( With T. W. Jones, S. O’Niell)

Page 16: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

16

Initial & Boundary ConditionsInitial & Boundary Conditions

Gravitation – Includes Dark Matter– Central Galaxy

– King Model; Mc = 3 kpc; M = 3.5 x 10(12) Mo at 20 kpc

– Cluster– NFW Model; alpha = 0; M = 3.5 x 10(10) Mo at 10 kpc– Cluster Core = 400 kpc; M = 3.5 x 10(12) Mo at 50 kpc

ICM – Equilibrium Configuration– Isothermal – T = 3 keV = 3.5 x10(7) K – Density n = 0.1 at z = 5 kpc

Page 17: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

17

Initial & Boundary ConditionsInitial & Boundary Conditions

ICM – Equilibrium Configuration– Magnetic Field

Orientation: Phi = 0, 45, 90B = const or Beta = const (120 – 75K) |B| = 0.2, 1, 5 MicroGauss (Beta = 7.5(4), 3(3), 120)

Bubble R = 2 kpcP = Pext at z = 15 kpcn = 0.01n at z = 15 kpc Inflation time ~ 10 MyrdE/dt ~ 10 (42) erg/s

Page 18: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

18

Relic Radio Bubble EvolutionRelic Radio Bubble Evolution

Beta = 3000Bo = 1 Microgauss Internal B Parallel at Top

Page 19: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

19

Relic Radio Bubble EvolutionRelic Radio Bubble Evolution

Beta = 120

Page 20: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

20

Three Dimensional MHD Three Dimensional MHD CalculationsCalculations

= 3000– Same Initial

Conditions as

2D Cases

Bubble MaterialVolume Rendered

t = 12.5 Myr

Page 21: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

21

Three Dimensional MHD Three Dimensional MHD CalculationsCalculations

= 3000

t = 75 Myrt = 150 Myr

Page 22: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

22

Three Dimensional MHD Three Dimensional MHD CalculationsCalculations

= 3000

Page 23: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

23

Three Dimensional MHD Three Dimensional MHD CalculationsCalculations

= 120 bubble only

t = 75 Myr

t = 150 Myr

Page 24: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

24

Three Dimensional MHD Three Dimensional MHD CalculationsCalculations

= 120

Page 25: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

25

Consistency with Consistency with ObservationsObservations

= 120

= 3000

Page 26: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

26

Next …Next …

Really

Tangled

Fields

Page 27: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

27

Bubbles with Tangled Interior Bubbles with Tangled Interior FieldsFields

– Beta = 120– t = 75 Myr

Page 28: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

28

Bubbles with Tangled Interior Bubbles with Tangled Interior FieldsFields

– Beta = 120– t = 75 Myr

Page 29: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

29

Conclusions – AGN Outflows and Conclusions – AGN Outflows and Reheating of the Ambient MediumReheating of the Ambient Medium

Radio Lobe Interaction with a Magnetized ICM Indicates:– Delay of Onset of Destructive Instabilities– Longer Times for Mixing with the ICM– Bubbles Decelerated, Evolution Subsonic– Volume of Lifted ICM Limited to Wake

Region Repeated Outbursts and/or Additional

Mixing Mechanisms May be Needed to Reheat the ICM

Page 30: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

30

Conclusions – AGN Outflows and Conclusions – AGN Outflows and Reheating of the Ambient MediumReheating of the Ambient Medium AGN Reheating Needed in CDM Galaxy

Formation Common FR-I Outflows May Show Strong Local

Coupling– Self Consistent Heating Rates not Yet Calculated

AGN Outflows in Clusters – Stop Cooling Flows?– Hydro Calculations Suggestive– Relic Radio Source Cavities Intact and Suggest

Interaction with a Magnetized ICM

Page 31: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

31

Consequences of B FieldsConsequences of B Fields

For Cluster ICM Reheating– Onset of Instability and Mixing Delayed– Initial Scale Length Large: l ~ 10 kpc

Mixing Time to Reheat Will Be Long - Time Required for Turbulent Cascade to Go From

Energy Range to Dissipation Range

– l /v ~ 3 x 10 yr

o

o turb

7

Page 32: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

32

Other Possible Heating Processes Other Possible Heating Processes Due to Radio Sources Due to Radio Sources

Sound Waves? Shock Waves?

Fabian et al. 2005

P/P

Page 33: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

33

Impact of Radio Source Impact of Radio Source CavitiesCavities

Complex ICM Structure – Centaurus Cluster

Fabian et al. 2005

0.4 – 7 keV + 1.4 GHz

Page 34: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

34

Other Possible Heating Processes Other Possible Heating Processes – Shock Waves– Shock Waves

Shock Waves:– Must be Supersonic

Sound Speed ~ 10 T Bubble Expansion Speed > 10 cm/s

– Likely to be Weak and Short LivedT* /T M, so T Not LargeBubbles Currently SubsonicVolume Heated Will be SmallDamped Shocks Become Sound Waves

– Thus a Local Phenomenon

4

8

Page 35: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

35

Other Possible Heating Processes Other Possible Heating Processes – Dissipation of Sound Waves– Dissipation of Sound Waves

Dissipation of Sound Waves– Some Models Assume pdV Energy Dissipated

in Cluster Core– Others – Approximate Dissipation (no B, no

Thermal Conductivity, Incompressible)L (3/8 ) c / ~ 100 kpc

Issue Not Yet Clear– How Much?– How Long?

2 2

Ruszkowski et al. 2004

Page 36: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

36

Non-Linear R-T InstabilityNon-Linear R-T Instability t = 0

Beta = 1.3 M Beta = 1.3 K 130 ~ ICM

1 kpc slices T = 10M K t = 15 Myr

Page 37: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

37

Prior MHD CalculationsPrior MHD Calculations

2-D MHD – Pre-formed BubbleTangential Field Inserted “By Hand”

Self Consistent MHD (Robinson et al. 2004)

Breuggen & Kaiser 2001

Page 38: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

38

Relic Radio Bubble EvolutionRelic Radio Bubble Evolution

Bubble

Deceleration

Page 39: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

39

Lifting and MixingLifting and MixingBeta = 120K OptimallyCoupled

Ambient ICM

Page 40: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

40

Relic Radio Bubble EvolutionRelic Radio Bubble Evolution

Beta = 3000Bo = 1 Microgauss; Internal B Antiparallel at Top

12.5 Myr

75

125

Page 41: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

41

Relic Sources in ClustersRelic Sources in Clusters 200 kpc Cavities (McNamara et al. 2005)

– MS0735– Z = 0.22– pdV ~ 10 erg

62

Page 42: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

42

Initial ConditionsInitial Conditions

Page 43: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

43

Properties of Radio Source Properties of Radio Source Cavities and ShellsCavities and Shells

Morphology– Limb Brightened, “Relaxed” Structure– NOT Head-Tail or “Normal” FR-I – Small/No Jets, but t ~ 10 yr– Tens of kpc in Diameter

Inferred Properties– In Pressure Equilibrium– Moving Subsonically (no Shocks)– Shell and Surroundings Cool– Buoyant Bubbles

7syn

Page 44: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

44

Relic Radio Bubble EvolutionRelic Radio Bubble Evolution

Beta = 3000Bo = 1 Microgauss Internal B

Anti-parallel at Top

Page 45: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

45

Three Dimensional MHD Three Dimensional MHD CalculationsCalculations

= 75000

Bubble Only - Volume Rendered

Page 46: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

46

Models of Buoyant Radio Models of Buoyant Radio Source BubblesSource Bubbles

3-D Hydrodynamic

Density8 Myr 25 Myr 41 Myr 59 Myr

Brueggen et al. 2002

10 x 10 x 30 kpc

Page 47: 1 Does AGN “Feedback” in Galaxy Clusters Work? Dave De Young NOAO Girdwood AK May 2007

47

Evolution of The Intracluster Evolution of The Intracluster Medium and BCGsMedium and BCGs

Related to Previous Problem in ΛCDM Cosmology Models

Large ΛCDM Halos Form Late, Correspond to Massive Clusters

Z = 0, M/L = Const