1 cber assessment of porcine circovirus in vaccines philip r. krause, m.d. fda/cber/ovrr 7 may 2010
TRANSCRIPT
1
CBER Assessment of Porcine Circovirus in Vaccines
Philip R. Krause, M.D.
FDA/CBER/OVRR
7 May 2010
2
Introduction• Historical Perspective
– SV40 and polio vaccines– EAV in egg-derived vaccines– TSE issues and vaccines– Use of novel cell substrates for vaccines
• CBER Laboratory Assessment of Porcine Circovirus in vaccines
3
SV40 and polio vaccines• In 1960, Sweet & Hilleman discovered SV40• Formalin inactivation of IPV did not completely inactivate
SV40• SV40-free vaccine was produced as quickly as possible
– Licensure of OPV was delayed until SV40 free preparation could be made
– No recall of IPV, but no release of additional IPV lots until SV40 was removed
• Consequences:– Some IPV recipients seroconverted to SV40– OPV recipients (including those in clinical trials who were
exposed to virus) did not seroconvert to SV40– Concerns re: SV40 and human cancers– overall, evidence does
not support a role
4
EAV in egg-produced vaccines• A more sensitive PCR test (PERT) for the enzyme,
reverse transcriptase (RT), present in retroviruses was developed.
• In 1996, this test showed that previously undetectable quantities of RT were present in some avian cell-produced vaccines
• Additional studies showed that EAV (endogenous avian retrovirus) is a defective particle and does not induce productive infections in culture
• Long safety record of hens’ egg produced vaccines, together with absence of evidence of potential harm to humans were also important considerations
5
TSE issues and vaccines• In early 2000s, concern was raised that bovine derived
materials sourced from countries with BSE or at risk of BSE could pose a theoretical risk to vaccinees
• Sourcing of bovine derived materials used for vaccine production was changed to countries not categorized as having BSE or at risk of BSE
• For products with potential exposures to bovine derived materials from countries with or at risk of BSE, risk assessments were performed, based on maximum possible exposures, dilution factors, potential infectious doses, etc.
• Many virus seeds were re-derived to remove all doubt
6
Cell substrates• Numerous discussions & advisory
committee presentations on introduction of new cell substrates for vaccine production
• Discussions addressed issues posed by tumorigenic phenotype, theoretical infectivity and oncogenicity risks of cell DNA or other cell components
• Issues addressed by risk assessment
7
Previous FDA evaluation of PCV• CREON Pancreatic enzyme preparation
– Advisory committee discussion 2008– Discussion was broad-ranging, covering all
potential porcine viruses– though PPV and PCV were recognized as the viruses most likely to survive the production process
– Potential for exposure to porcine agents is mentioned in the package insert
8
CBER’s Scientific Approach to Evaluating PCV in Vaccines
• Major question: Is PCV in rotavirus vaccines likely to represent infectious virus?– Molecular studies
• Can PCV nucleic acid be detected in vaccines?• How much PCV nucleic acid is in vaccines?• Are PCV nucleic acids in vaccines particle associated?• Are PCV nucleic acids present as full-length genomes
– In vaccine– In particles purified from vaccines
• How does sequence of PCV1 from vaccines compare with sequence of known infectious PCV1?
– Cell culture studies• Do vaccine-inoculated previously uninfected cells show evidence of
virus infection?
9
PCR assays used to detect PCV1
• Four conventional PCR assays were used in initial studies
• We used sequencing & Southern hybridization to confirm results
10
Rotarix contains PCV1 DNA• Rotarix was consistently
positive for PCV1 DNA• Rotateq was negative for
PCV1 DNA (to limits of this assay’s sensitivity)
• All assay controls (negatives, extraction controls, positives) yielded expected results
• These results are consistent with findings reported by GSK, Dr. Delwart
1
SERUM
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 1 2
POSITIVE NEGATIVE
PrimersExtraction # 1 2 3
1223311223
ROTATEQROTATEQ
3
RO
TA
RIX
RO
TA
TE
Q
RO
TA
RIX
SP
IKE
11
Long PCR & Sequencing• Long PCR
– We detected and cloned a 1638 nt PCR product (PCV1 genome size: 1759 nt) directly from final Rotarix product
• Sequencing of PCV1 from Rotarix– Entire genome of virus from Rotarix final container available
(combination of CBER and data from Dr. Delwart)– Some variability in sequence, but no nucleotide changes not already
reported in Genbank for wild-type virus– No changes in ORFs
0 100
200
300
40050
0
600
700
800900
1000
11
00
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
PCV1
1638 nt
12
Quantitative PCR• Used three PCV1 primer pairs and two PCV2 primer
pairs
• Studied DNA extracted from vaccine samples– Total DNA extracted from vaccines (“Direct prep”)– Particle-associated DNA was assessed by “Capsid prep”, which
included nuclease treatment and ultracentrifugation• Quantified PCV DNA by TaqMan qPCR
0 100
200
300
40050
0
600
700
800900
1000
11
00
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
PCV1
70 nt
0 100
200
300
40050
0
600
700
800900
1000
11
00
1200
1300
1 400
1500
1600
PCV1
529 nt
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800900
1000
11
00
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
PCV1
1638 nt
0 10 0
200
300
400500
600
700
800900
1000
1100
1200
1300
140 0
1500
1600
PCV2
87 nt
0 10 0
200
300
400500
600
700
800900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
PCV2
357 nt
13
PCV quantitation: Rotarix• Both Rotarix samples were
positive for PCV1• Both Rotarix samples were
negative for PCV2• Not all virus DNA is full-length;
longer PCRs yielded lower quantities of PCV1 DNA
• At each PCR fragment size, most PCV1 DNA was particle-associated
• Each vaccine dose contained around 100,000 copies of near full-length, particle-associated PCV1 DNA
GSK 2 GSK 3
PC
V c
opie
s/m
L
70 529
163
8
35787
≤100
106
107
105
104
103
102
101
70 529
163
8
35787
LOQ
Virus: PCV1 PCV2 Prep: Capsid Direct
14
Further studies on Rotateq
• Using a more sensitive Taqman qPCR, PCV1 and PCV2 DNA fragments were detected in Rotateq final container
• Particle-associated PCV2 DNA fragments were detected in Rotateq bulks
• Further studies are ongoing
15
GSK IPV-containing vaccines
• CBER’s final container PCRs for PCV1 and PCV2 are inconclusive due to PCR inhibition in spiking experiments – Follow up experiments pending
• Further studies will be performed when viral harvest samples are available– PCR– Infectivity
16
Infectivity studies: Considerations
• Inactivation of rotavirus could also inactivate PCV
• Theoretical concern that bovine serum might contain neutralizing antibodies to PCV and thus reduce sensitivity of studies
• Need to assure that no exogenous PCV is added to culture
• Different cell types have different susceptibility to virus
• If cells become confluent, virus will not grow even in susceptible cell types
• Virus does not cause cytopathic effect
S phase
17
Infectivity studies: Considerations
• Inactivation of rotavirus could also inactivate PCV
• Theoretical concern that bovine serum might contain neutralizing antibodies to PCV and thus reduce sensitivity of studies
• Need to assure that no exogenous PCV is added to culture
• Different cell types have different susceptibility to virus
• If cells become confluent, virus will not grow even in susceptible cell types
• Virus does not cause cytopathic effect
CBER approach• Heat inactivation under conditions where
PCV is resistant• Use Ig-depleted bovine serum for cultures
• Use recombinant trypsin and pre-tested reagents
• Use swine testis (ST) cells• Inoculate sub-confluent cells & maintain
cells in growth phase by sub-passage @ day 3
• Evaluate cultures by qPCR to detect virus DNA
S phase
18
Infectivity study: Rotarix• Mock-infected Swine testis (ST) cells
yielded negative results• Cells inoculated with Rotarix (GSK1
and GSK 2) showed increasing PCV1 DNA quantities, measured by 529 nt qPCR
• Particle-associated PCV1 DNA was also produced
• (Not shown) Particle-associated PCV1 DNA was also detected in cell culture supernatants at day 3 and day 6
• (Not shown) Inoculation of cell lysates from day 6 of vaccine cultures onto fresh ST cells revealed 2-4 log increases in PCV1 DNA quantity after 3 additional days in culture
• We have not formally evaluated the sensitivity of this assay
≤101
107
108
106
105
104
103
102
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
PC
V1
copi
es
Time (Days)
Sample: GSK 2 GSK 3 MockPrep: Capsid prep Direct extraction
19
CBER and Manufacturer’s resultsVaccine CBER Manufacturer
Rotarix (GSK)
PCV1 DNA in product PCV1 DNA in product, bulks, seeds, cells
Particle-associated near full length PCV1 DNA in product
Infectious PCV1 in cell culture Infectious PCV1 in cell culture
IPV containing vaccines (GSK)
Pending PCV1 DNA in harvest, seeds, cells, but not in bulks or final container
Rotateq (Merck)
Particle-associated PCV2 DNA in harvest; PCV1 and PCV2 DNA in final container
PCV1 and PCV2 DNA in harvest, PCV DNA in final container
20
Implications• Tests of increasing sensitivity can detect very
low quantities of virus DNA and of virus• We do not know if it is possible to completely
eliminate PCV from porcine trypsin• Porcine and other animal-derived reagents
used in vaccine manufacture could potentially contain other viruses, known and as-yet unknown
• It is impossible to absolutely assure that vaccines do not contain adventitious viruses
21
Conclusions• PCV1 DNA, particles, infectious virus are
present in Rotarix• PCV1 and PCV2 DNA is present at low levels
in Rotateq– Further evaluation is ongoing
• PCV1 DNA is present in poliovirus harvests– Not detected by manufacturer in final bulks or final
container– Quantities are low and purification/inactivation
procedures are in place
22
• Laboratory work– Christine Uhlenhaut– Shasta McClenahan– Shuang Tang
• Reagents– Gordon Allan– Steve Krakowka– Andrew Cheung– XJ Meng
• FDA Scientific Advice– Jerry Weir– Robin Levis– Keith Peden– Arifa Khan– Konstantin Chumakov– Erik Henchal
Acknowledgements
23
DISCUSSION POINTS
1. Based on the information presented today on the detection of porcine circovirus (PCV) or PCV DNA in US licensed rotavirus vaccines:
a) Please discuss the available scientific evidence and identify factors to be considered in assessing the potential risk of the use of US licensed rotavirus vaccines.
b) Please discuss any additional scientific studies and information that you would recommend FDA consider in its deliberations.
24
DISCUSSION POINTS
2. Given the available data about porcine circoviruses, including the lack of known infectivity and pathogenic effects in humans, and that porcine circoviruses or PCV DNA may be present in both US licensed rotavirus vaccines, please discuss factors to be considered in determining whether, or in what circumstances, the benefits of using rotavirus vaccines outweigh the theoretical risk from PCV.
25
DISCUSSION POINTS
3. Please discuss the application of emerging technologies, and the implications for their use in the detection of known and unknown adventitious agents in vaccines currently licensed, as well as those under development.
26
Backup slides
27
PCV quantitation: Rotateq• Weak signals were
observed for both PCV1 and PCV2 DNA fragments in Rotateq final container
• This assay is more sensitive than that performed initially
• Virus DNA was not demonstrated to be particle-associated
• Near full-length PCV1 or 357 nt PCV2 sequences were not detected
70 529
163
8
35787
Merck 1 Merck 2 Merck 3
70 529
163
8
35787 70 529
163
8
35787
PC
V c
opie
s/m
L
≤100
106
107
105
104
103
102
101
LOQ
Virus: PCV1 PCV2 Prep: Capsid Direct
28
PCV quantitation: Rotateq bulks• Bulks are more concentrated
than final container vaccines, so PCV concentration is expected to be higher
• In spiking experiments, inhibition was detected in the direct prep, but not in the capsid preps.
• Rotateq bulks were negative for particle-associated PCV1
• Using the shortest (87 nt) PCR, some PCV2 DNA was particle-associated
Bulk 1Bulk 2Bulk 3Bulk 4Bulk 5
PC
V c
opie
s/m
L
529
35787
≤100
106
107
105
104
103
102
101
529
35787
529
35787
529
35787
529
35787
LOQ
s
Virus: PCV1 PCV2 Prep: Capsid Direct