1 !ℎ= ’(∆*) 2 - bungee journal – for a community of bungee...

3
Luke Farley November 9, 2017 Partner: Karlens Joas PHYS 113-05 A Dynamic Look at our Bungee Cord In this experiment, we set out to more realistically investigate the properties of our bungee cord by conducting a dynamic experiment in which the cord would behave in a manner similar to that of an actual bungee jump. Hence, we designed an experiment in which we could use the Conservation of Energy to determine a new, dynamic bungee constant, which we hypothesized would be slightly different from the static constant we analyzed in our previous experiment. Our experiment was built on the following equation which follows from the Conservation of Energy, claiming that the original potential energy due to gravity should be equal to the final spring potential energy. ℎ = 1 2 (∆) , Here, h is the vertical distance between the drop point and the height of the mass at the bottom of the jump, and ∆x is the bungee cord’s displacement from equilibrium. We dropped a mass attached to the bungee cord and recorded the original height h, as well as the cord’s displacement, ∆x, to find a dynamic bungee constant k. For three different equilibrium lengths, we dropped five different masses and computed the average k-value at each equilibrium length. We then plotted the k-values against the equilibrium lengths, and found a model for k to be k = 47.232L 2 – 48.402L + 14.772 +/- .0936 N/m, where the uncertainty was calculated with a linear regression analysis. However, we understand that this model cannot be accurate, as it is quadratic, and thus predicts that k will eventually begin to increase as the equilibrium length becomes longer. We believe our data may have been skewed by the difficulty of collecting accurate data with a slow-motion camera and tape-measure. Figure 1: Diagram of Experiment Set-up

Upload: lythien

Post on 16-Jun-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

LukeFarley November9,2017Partner:KarlensJoas PHYS113-05

ADynamicLookatourBungeeCord

Inthisexperiment,wesetouttomorerealisticallyinvestigatethepropertiesofourbungeecordbyconductingadynamicexperimentinwhichthecordwouldbehaveinamannersimilartothatofanactualbungeejump.Hence,wedesignedanexperimentinwhichwecouldusetheConservationofEnergytodetermineanew,dynamicbungeeconstant,whichwehypothesizedwouldbeslightlydifferentfromthestaticconstantweanalyzedinourpreviousexperiment.OurexperimentwasbuiltonthefollowingequationwhichfollowsfromtheConservationofEnergy,claimingthattheoriginalpotentialenergyduetogravityshouldbeequaltothefinalspringpotentialenergy.

𝑚𝑔ℎ =12𝑘(∆𝑥)

,

Here,histheverticaldistancebetweenthedroppointandtheheightofthemassatthebottomofthejump,and∆xisthebungeecord’sdisplacementfromequilibrium.Wedroppedamassattachedtothebungeecordandrecordedtheoriginalheighth,aswellasthecord’sdisplacement,∆x,tofindadynamicbungeeconstantk.Forthreedifferentequilibriumlengths,wedroppedfivedifferentmassesandcomputedtheaveragek-valueateachequilibriumlength.Wethenplottedthek-valuesagainsttheequilibriumlengths,andfoundamodelforktobek=47.232L2–48.402L+14.772+/-.0936N/m,wheretheuncertaintywascalculatedwithalinearregressionanalysis.However,weunderstandthatthismodelcannotbeaccurate,asitisquadratic,andthuspredicts thatkwilleventuallybegin to increaseas theequilibrium lengthbecomes longer.We believe our datamay have been skewed by the difficulty of collectingaccuratedatawithaslow-motioncameraandtape-measure.Figure1:DiagramofExperimentSet-up

Withamountclampedtothetable,wehungourbungeecordandtiedthehangingmasstoitwithasmallslipknot.Wealsohungatapemeasuredownfromthemountinordertoaccuratelymeasurethechangeinheightandthecord’sdisplacement.WeusedaniPhonecamera,specificallytheCoachMyVideoapplication,inordertocapturethepositionofthemassatthebottomofitsfall.Table1:Summaryofk-valuesbasedonequilibriumlength.Uncertaintywascalculatedbytakingtheaveragestandarderrorinalinearregressionanalysisforeachofourk-values.

EquilibriumLength(m)+/-.001m k(N/m)+/-.109115N/m

0.351 3.602323

0.448 2.567988

0.557 2.466327Chart1:TheplotofPEgrav(mgh)vs.1/2∆x^2forallthreeequilibriumlengthsL.

AsvisualizedinChart1,therelationshipbetweenthepotentialenergyduetogravityand½∆x2wasindeedfairlylinearforallthreeofourequilibriumlengths.Notice,however,thattheslopeofthelinesforequilibriumlengths.448mand.557marealmostidentical.Althoughwewouldexpecttoseethek-valuecontinuetodecreaseataconsiderablerateastheequilibriumlength

PEgrav =3.6023*1/2∆x2

PEgrav =2.568*1/2∆x2

PEgrav =2.4663*1/2∆x2

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

PEgrav(J)

1/2∆x2 (m2)

PEgrav vs.1/2∆x2

L=.351m

L=.448m

L=.557m

Linear(L=.351m)

Linear(L=.448m)

Linear(L=.557m)

increases,thiswasnotthecaseforourdata,whichledtofurtherunexpectedresultsinattemptingtomodeltherelationshipbetweenkandequilibriumlength.Ourunexpectedresultsarelikelyduetohumanerrorinmeasuringdisplacementwiththeslow-motioncameraandtape-measure.Asinourpreviousstaticexperiment,weplottedtheseaveragek-valuesagainsttheirrespectiveequilibriumlengths.Chart2:PlotofkagainstL,whereListheequilibriumlength,foreachofouraveragek-values.

Afterfittingseveraldifferentmodelsonourdataandconductinglinearregressionanalyses,wefoundaquadraticequationtofitourdatabest,asseeninChart2,whichisdescribedbytheequationk=47.232L2–48.402L+14.772+/-.0936N/m.Othermodelshadhigherstandarderrors,between.25and.35N/m,anditwasalsovisuallyclearthattheydidnotfitthedataaswell.Intuitively,however,thisquadraticcannotbeanaccuratemodelfork,asthiswouldsuggestthatthek-valueswouldbegintoincreaseagainastheequilibriumlengthbecomeslonger,whichweknowshouldnothappen.Insummary,weconductedadynamicexperimentwithourbungeecordbydroppingamassattachedtothecordandrecordingthedistanceitfellaswellasthedistancethecordstretched.WeusedthisinformationalongwiththeCWEtheoreminordertofindanexpectedk-valueforourbungeecordatthreedifferentequilibriumlengths.Furthermore,inanefforttodevelopamodelforkgivenanyequilibriumlength,weplottedkagainstequilibriumlength.Sincewebelieveourquadraticmodeltobeinaccurateduetopotentialerrorindatacollectionwiththeslow-motionvideo,wewilllikelyconsiderthefindingsofourfellowclassmatesintheBungeeJournalwhenplanningourfinalbungeejump.Onmyhonor,Ihaveneithergivennorreceivedanyunacknowledgedaid.

k=47.232L2 - 48.402L+14.772

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

k(N/m

)

Eq(m)

kvs.L

kvs.Eq

Poly.(kvs.Eq)