© endure, february 2007 food quality and safety © endure, february 2007 food quality and safety...
TRANSCRIPT
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
ALTERNATIVE
WEED CONTROL
IN ARABLE CROPS
France
MODULE C19
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
Aims of weed mechanical or mixt control :
Sustainable use of herbicides
Background: reduction of pesticides in France→ Grenelle Environment→ Basin supply catchment
Reducing the cost of herbicides use→ 15-25% of operating expenses
Sustainable herbicideThe technical "plus" → Effect on soil warming
→ Interest in the positioning of fertilizers
→ Enable mineralization
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
Weed control into therotation:
Agronomic Principles– Diversifying crops– Take advantage of intercropping to reduce the
seed bank– Use tillage wisely– Stagger planting dates– Using the factor “crop competition”
By combining these principles the maximum weed control will be facilitated, optimized the use of herbicides and the risk of emergence of resistance limited
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
Comparison of twoweed management
Region Burgundy (France)Wheat Weeds: Alopecurus, Bromus, Veronica, Viola, Galium
3L Tillering Ear at 1cm
Beginning ofStem elongation
1 Node
2 to 3 staleseedbed
Shiftingthe sowing date from the 20th of
october
2 tillages
T2Propoxycarbazone
+ florasulam
No possibility of mechanical controlwith winter weather
conditions
Density +10%
Sowing
MIX
TC
HE
MIC
AL
From 1st of october
T1Isoproturon + dff + ioxynil + bromoxynil
T2MesosulfuronIodosulfuron +Propoxycarbazone
+ florasulame
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
Comparison of twoweed management
Region Burgundy (France)
Rosette
1 stale seed-bed
From earlyseptember
Sowing
MIX
TC
HE
MIC
AL
Frommid-august
T1NapropamidClomazoneDimetachlor+ quinmeracmétazachlor
Oil-seed rape Weeds :Alopecurus, Bromus, Matricaria, Stellaria,Galium, (Geranium)
Cotyledon 1L 4L
Hoeing
T2Propyzamid
T1NapropamidClomazoneDimetachlorOn 1/3 of the
soil
T2Propyzamid
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
Comparison of twoweed management
Region Burgundy (France)
Semis
MIX
TC
HE
MIC
AL
Maize Weeds : Summer grasses, Chenopodium, Amaranthus, Solanum nigrum
2 L
Hoeing
Emergence 4 L 5-6 L 8 L
Cover-cropping
AndTillage
T1Acetochlore + dichlormid
T1Mesotrione
+ s-métolachlorOn the sowing row
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
Exemples d’itinéraire technique
Region Burgundy (France)
Sowing
MIX
TC
HE
MIC
AL
Sunflower Weeds : Summer grasses, Chenopodium, Amaranthus, Solanum nigrum
Hoeing
Cover-cropping
andTillage
T1S-métolachlor
T1Flurochloridone on the sowing
row
Emergence 4 L
T2Flurochloridone
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
Comparison of twoweed management
Region Burgundy (France)
Sowing
MIX
TC
HE
MIC
AL T1 + T2 + T3 + T4
Phenmediphamdesmedipham EthofumesatMetamitron
Lenacil
Sugar-beet Weeds : Chenopodium, Apiaceae, Sonchus, Cirsium, Mercurialis, CRape volunteers, Matricairia, Amaranthus …
Cotyledon 1L 4L
Hoeing2 passages
T5Grass killer herbicide (if
needed)40% rate
To control all the weedsemergences
T1 + T2Phenmediphamdesmedipham EthofumesatMetamitron
Lenacil
To control only the earlierweeds emergencues
T3Grass killer herbicide (if
needed)40% rate
Total or localised spray
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
Pesticides usereduction
TFI = Treatment Frequency Index = number of registrared rates sprayed in a field
0.000.200.400.600.801.001.201.401.601.802.002.202.402.602.80
Chemical Mixt
Wheat
TF
I H
erb
icid
e Herbicide - 51%
Oil-seed rape
Herbicide - 45%
Treatment Frequency Index
2,17
1,33
1,77
2,77
0,96
Maize
1,27
0,33
Herbicide - 73%
Sunflower
1,67
0,33
Herbicide - 80%
Chemical MixtChemical MixtChemical Mixt
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETYAgricultural feasibility
Loamy
Clayey
Capped
Stony
Rotative hoe Weed harrow Hoeing machine
Stage
Grasses
Broadleaves
EM 2L 4L 6L EM 2L 4L 6L EM 2L 4L 6L
Stage
Selectiviy
EM <2L 4L 6L EM <2L 4L 6L EM <2L 4L 6L
Well adapted Adapted Dangerous No
SO
ILW
EE
DS
CR
OP
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETYEconomical viability
WHEAT MAIZE
Chemical Mixt Chemical Mixt
Gross margin (€/ha)(Total – Operating expenses)
558 601 717 754
Net margin (€/ha)(Gross margin – Mechanization
expenses)
428 445 564 593
Comparison of operating expenses In chemical or mixt management
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Chemical Mixt Chemical Mixt
Op
erat
ing
exp
ense
s (€
/ha)
Regulators
Insecticides
Herbicides
Fongicides
Fertilization
Seeds
Intercropping
- 43 €
- 37 €
WHEAT MAIZE
Mechanization expenses In chemical or mixt management
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Chemical Mixt Chemical Mixt
Mec
ha
niz
ati
on
ex
pen
ses
(€/h
a)
Spraying and fertilization
Chemical weed control
Mechanical weed control
Sowing
Intercropping
+ 26 €+ 8 €
WHEAT MAIZE
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
Other inovative techniquesExperimental
Direct Drilling
Live Mulch
Mixt crops
Geraniums in early winter (weeds/m²)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Deepcultivating
Deep + supcultivating
Direct drilling Direct drilling
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
© E
ND
UR
E,
Feb
ruar
y 20
07
FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY
Conclusion: Response to general principles of IPM
Environment:Reduced quantities of herbicides (Part 5)
AgronomyResistance management (part 7)Use of alternative methods (part 4)Combination with preventive methods (part 1)
Terms of Success: technical knowledge
EconomyMargins comparable between chemical and mixt managementMore advantages if mechanization investment (equipement with large width, gps, ...)More manpower is sometimes needed